User talk:Sammi Brie/Archive 35

DYK for KCTY (Kansas City)
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

DYK for KPXG-TV
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

WIRO/WITO
Something major got left out of your attempts to move these articles.

I think the only problem was the redirect on WFHT (FM), and I found myself reaching a dead end because there was nothing in the WITO article that explained the redirect.

So I attempted to solve the problem before I finally realized WIRO was no longer an AM station and therefore, there did not need to be a WIRO-FM.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  22:58, 2 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Oops! One of those stations has just been a game of call sign pinball in the last year, @Vchimpanzee. It's easy to miss a redirect when that happens! Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 23:20, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
 * The first person to respond on User talk:Waystolie1000 did give me some valuable information as that station is making yet another change. It just so happens the announcement was today. All I was trying to do was make a joke about listening to WOKE Radio on a web site and the process of figuring out what I was going to say ended up ... way more complicated than I had imagined. But I've done some fixes as a result.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  23:35, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
 * @Vchimpanzee At least Strong Tower won't be making many major changes (aside from maybe changing the call letters one more time). That station has had a dizzying last few years. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 00:10, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Would you be willing to bet on that? The last time the station played gospel music, it changed quickly to something else.


 * I thought of some more possible fixes that need to be made.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  15:36, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
 * If you need more fixes, let me know. Given all the changes, there are bound to be more errors than usual. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 17:43, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I fixed one problem that didn't exist (of course iHeart no longer owns it) but someone else found it.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  16:01, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:FCC LMS letter
Template:FCC LMS letter has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:14, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

DYK for WGBO-DT
Vanamonde 00:03, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

DYK for WEIB
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

DYK for WLMA (South Carolina)
Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

DYK for WSNS-TV
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

DYK for WECT (New York)
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

DYK for KOLE
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

DYK for WSTR-TV
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

GA reassessment: Mail chute
Mail chute has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Vladimir.copic (talk) 03:42, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

 * Thanks, @Gusfriend. The Coldwell situations are just...overwhelming. I'm seriously considering dropping my plans to rewrite Shelby Gem Factory and sufficing with adding some of the material I was going to port anyway—my rewrites do turn up new source material. I tend to be newspaper-heavy as a matter of course with my field, but I'm lucky to write in a topic where the major national trade journals are digitized full-run and most regional or larger U.S. papers unlock new areas and improvements. That isn't always the case. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 07:39, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I agree on the overwhelming part. At this point I am working under the principle that little improvements along the way help. Keep up the good work. Gusfriend (talk) 07:45, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks. @Gusfriend As kind of an explainer, the top-to-bottom rewrite is done to avoid CCI issues. You will likely see lots of Coldwell pages be delisted or brought to GAR soon. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 08:28, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

DYK for WMYD
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

DYK for KRCL
Vanamonde 12:02, 14 September 2022 (UTC) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 02:44, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of WXTV-DT
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article WXTV-DT you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of X750 -- X750 (talk) 08:40, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

WBFS
Hello, WBFS has returned to it's Independent status on September 19. On the My network TV you can see that Miami does not have an affiliate at the moment. I would also like to mention that it has removed all references to it's former programming. As for the CBS alternative, it airs CBS programming when WFOR is not available, including sports and weather. — Preceding unsigned comment added by J1577 (talk • contribs) 17:02, 23 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi @J1577, I know these things. They're dealt with in the article body; the fact it occasionally airs CBS programming is not worth noting in the infobox. My main problem is that no reliable source has actually said what we know about WBFS yet, and when you intend to nominate the article for GA at some point soon, that's a problem. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 17:22, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Alright. I'm also still looking into which station, if one at all, will replace WBFS and WSBK as the MyNetworkTV affiliates in their respective markets. JR1120 17:26, 23 September 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by J1577 (talk • contribs)

Infobox television channel
Hi, see Network 10. Due to the long channel names, the rest of the infobox is full of white space. I tried a nowrap on one of the affiliates, and that made everything look good/normal, except the channel section. Any solutions? MB 00:18, 22 September 2022 (UTC)


 * That infobox needs some material excised from it or converted to footnotes, @MB. The long channel descriptions and the long Affiliates list are causing issues. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 00:30, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * It looks link an infobox now! MB 21:53, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

DYK for KUGS
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

Questions on living-person info
Hi, you said I could write on your talk page if I had questions on a recent deletion of a change I made to Clayton Morris' page. I'm kind of a newbie at this, and will trust that you made the right decision. You also went the extra mile to browse the podcast and noted the pro-Russian content and "other mundane videos espousing conservative views". I would argue that those other videos are rarely mundane, they are typically conspiracy theory stuff on e.g. vaccines and other topics, and all that is also in line with Russian propaganda, because it picks up and platforms any idea that can divide and weaken us.

I did search for sources and will try some more, but the name "redacted" is quite general and makes it a bit hard. Meanwhile, here are my questions: 1. Would it be possible to elegantly exemplify to convey the same point? E.g. if I say that this podcast has furthered the Ukraine bioweapons lab conspiracy theory (linked to the wikipedia page on that conspiracy theory) and provide a link to the relevant podcast as citation (titled "Leaked documents show Ukraine has BIOWEAPONS labs funded by Biden administration"). And perhaps one or two more such examples. Would that fly? 2. Could I ask for, in the Morris' talk page, that we should keep an eye out for reliable sources that this is a Russian propaganda channel, with some examples of his podcast topics? Or would such content be thrown out of talk pages as well? Thanks for any guidance. JeppenX (talk) 14:52, 27 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi @JeppenX. They're crazy conspiracies, for sure. The thing is this: We need a reliable source—and, given the nature of the statement, preferably multiple of them—to talk about his channel and the disinformation it promotes. So far, that has not happened. We don't have, say, Ben Collins of NBC News discussing Redacted or an article in some other publication to fall back on. I mean, this stuff is downright awful—or, per several of their video titles, SH*T (samples: "Globalists in full panic over Italy as EU starts to collapse", "The WEF's plan to REMAKE Mexico, US, and Canada's borders EXPOSED!", "Bill Clinton and Blackrock team up to ACCELERATE the great reset", "Doctors EXPOSE college vaccine mandates with stunning data", "He's EXPOSING the most suppressed UFO and Alien evidence of all time", "Is China killing Uyghurs or is the UN full of Sh*t", "Did Putin Just OUTPLAY Everyone?", etc.).
 * You can, though, say something on the talk page. I do note that the reason I got involved with this article is because one of Clayton's employees is a disclosed paid editor. She proposed some edits (most of which I found acceptable for inclusion and incorporated, along with some other material I was able to locate). That's why I went looking at the various videos.
 * The main roadblock to characterizing what this is—disinformation and furthering conspiracies—is having reliable sources comment on it as such. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 19:45, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of WXTV-DT
The article WXTV-DT you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:WXTV-DT for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of X750 -- X750 (talk) 09:21, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for a steady flow of GAs! Chamber music pictured today: Spannungen --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:21, 21 September 2022 (UTC)


 * There are plenty more where that came from, @Gerda Arendt. I have six pages at GAN and another 52 (!!) pages in the can awaiting nomination. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 18:36, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * great plans! - travel and strings sound --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:37, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
 * congrats to the FA! - When would you like that to appear as TFA? Can I help nominating, for a specific date in the next free month (November), or asap, or for a date next years the go to WP:TFARP? Nothing needs to be done if none of these ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:34, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks, @Gerda Arendt! There's no real date that corresponds to it unless January 2 (its first date on air in 1979) is a good fit. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 17:23, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to the club.

 * Thank you so much, @Gog the Mild. Nearly 17 years and it's finally a reality. Incredibly excited. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 17:22, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
 * 17 years! My goodness. It seemed to run through fairly smoothly. Now that you have the knack of it, I hope that we won't be waiting 17 years for the next. I have provisionally scheduled WBPX-TV to run as TFA on 1 November if that is ok with you? Gog the Mild (talk) 17:48, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
 * You can do that if you wanted, @Gog the Mild... There is no real date strongly associated with it other than its January 2 sign-on date, to be quite honest.
 * I do have several other pages that could go to FA. KCPQ is probably next, and WSNS-TV I improved this year and think an FA is possible. WWJ-TV would be a co-nomination, but I can't bring it to FAC until they start their planned newscast later this year. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 17:56, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Hey Sammi
Hey Sammi, can you please retarget the Channel Eleven redirect to Channel 11 as seen on Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 23 as soon as possible. From Bas. Bassie f (talk) 01:07, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

DYK for WAZS (AM)
~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 04:39, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Triple Crown


Congratulations! It's great to see you've ventured out into FA after many years of hard work at DYK and GA. If you liked the FA process I'm sure an upgrade is in reach, and you might also find an article that would befit a Four Award. — Bilorv ( talk ) 18:09, 2 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks, @Bilorv! See my comments to Gog above. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 08:17, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Oak Industries
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for KLUX
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of WSCV
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article WSCV you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 21:00, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Faustino López Vargas

 * Congrats on your first RD! I hope you stick around at ITN; it can become a warzone sometimes, but overall it's a nice little community Curbon7 (talk) 07:44, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

WBPX-TV scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 1 November 2022. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Today's featured article/November 1, 2022, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/November 2022. I suggest that you watchlist Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:33, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for your informative GAR of Bear Witness
I'd like to personally thank you for your detailed GAR of Bear Witness. It was highly instructive and I'll pay more attention to those punctuation and quotation problems you encountered. You deserve to enjoy your time on WP.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 21:56, 11 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the kind words. I made User:Sammi Brie/Commas in sentences after seeing the issue time and again at GAN. Your most common issue was inserting other types of unneeded commas. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 22:38, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for KVNO
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for WNER
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of WSCV
The article WSCV you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:WSCV for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 20:21, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for WBUF-TV
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for WJZR
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of WHYY-TV
The article WHYY-TV you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:WHYY-TV for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Guerillero -- Guerillero (talk) 14:20, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of WBAA
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article WBAA you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 19:40, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

KXKW-LD
Thank you for sorting out, I had been hoping that somebody who knows about this stuff could have a look. Dr. Vogel (talk) 22:04, 15 October 2022 (UTC)


 * This is a strange case, . In the late 2000s, there was a window to create companion channels for low-power TV stations for digital conversion, but not everyone used it. This station did—and kept its analog station going plus it moved it to channel 6 to serve as a franken-FM. It's a bit odd, but the topics would not have separate GNG either. Low-power TV stations are tough to source, admittedly. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 22:07, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for WXTV-DT
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for KBRH
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of WBAA
The article WBAA you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:WBAA for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 20:00, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of WBAA
The article WBAA you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:WBAA for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 21:02, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of KEXP-FM
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article KEXP-FM you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 21:40, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for KHOY
Vanamonde 12:03, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of KEXP-FM
The article KEXP-FM you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:KEXP-FM for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 19:20, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Shaun Aguano
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of KEXP-FM
The article KEXP-FM you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:KEXP-FM for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 17:41, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Concerns about editing NYC Area Stations
I know I don't like to talk about this. I don't know even know if I feel this is the right things to talk about it. And given how instantly triggered I am to be angry on how my edits were reverted by people who don't want to discuss on making it better, I feel like I needed to talk. Look, I'm not angry at you. I know I have my criticisms at people who reverted at edits (and my defenses on my edits) and how I get bitter or upset at them (yes, I tend to be like an instant hothead), but I feel unsafe at editing any NYC Area TV/Radio Station, other that the small minor changes (like adding new anchors or programs that were added). I've tried to work on a few edits, but sometimes, there's people who would called the shots and killed off my edits, including the one that was important for it. I feel like editing there is nothing but truly toxic and depressing place for me to even step foot on them. I know I tried to be nice at all and will sometimes try to be collaborative (I even helped on a few pages, like on this one reporter OR EVEN saving an entire tech company from being deleted which I'm proud of doing what's right! :D) I felt like I'm being ignored, even if I feel like a newbie. I don't want to edit there anymore. I hate it. And as someone who edits at times and for a long period, I know how much I don't like things to turn into a Win-Lose mentality and just make things into a Win-Win. I wish there's a way, because the people there are not even nice, nor do I feel welcomed there anymore. This is why I'm wanting to quit editing here. (Also, forgot to mention, I don't want to harm nobody and I don't want to personal attack anyone (which I always avoid but I'm trying to keep my cool when trying to express my criticism on people's revisions), I feel it is an extremely difficult place to collaborate when people often go brazen and care nothing about improving with my input and giving good win-win collaboration, even with the most difficult editors) 20chances (talk) 18:18, 19 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi, this is a long message. Can you show me which edits of yours were reverted? Also, do you have Discord? Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 23:14, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
 * @Sammi Brie: I apologize if it's super long. And yes, I think it has to do with WNYL (I know that station and it's in fact switching to all-news which sucks since I listen to Alternative Rock T_T). And no I don't have a Discord for Wikipedia (sorry about that). The Tweets I mentioned were in fact officially from the Station themselves but sadly he dismisses them claiming that it's "User Generated Content" when its directly from the station. I believe 1010 WINS has announced the time when they'll make the switch, too. Also, he didn't gave me a reason why he took down an edit on where the format is moving to, when I told him it's absolutely unnecessary to remove them since it was in good faith and it was needed. I honestly feel these editors who are too difficult to work with anyone (myself included) and I'm worried about them giving me a very hard time when they revert my good faith edits and it's making me wanting to stop editing at those stations. This is why it's making me feel update in the first place. 20chances (talk) 23:22, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
 * @20chances, you can join the Discord server, and it's fine.
 * WP:ABOUTSELF supports your use of those tweets:
 * I've taken the action of reverting the reversion. I'm also pinging so he can see my rationale for accepting that content.  Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 23:29, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
 * You need to talk to User:BlueboyLINY about his other questionable edits. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 23:32, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
 * It's cool and I appreciate your help in defending me on my edits. I just can't understand why that user would do this. This is absolutely upsetting to me and to the contributions of the page itself. 20chances (talk) 23:35, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I can understand why an editor might see "oh, Twitter" and go "unreliable source". This is about its only acceptable use. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 23:37, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Right. I wish there could have been a better way, even to help people understand about what's acceptable use. I know I don't wanna turn things into a very sour note, even with editing wars. 20chances (talk) 23:41, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I can understand why an editor might see "oh, Twitter" and go "unreliable source". This is about its only acceptable use. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 23:37, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Right. I wish there could have been a better way, even to help people understand about what's acceptable use. I know I don't wanna turn things into a very sour note, even with editing wars. 20chances (talk) 23:41, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for WBZY (Connecticut)
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Pink Media Group
An article that you have been involved in editing&mdash;Pink Media Group&mdash;has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 01:55, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Subchannel scopes
Yeah, I got mixed up on KAAL (TV). But why do I have to "clean up" after you, adding the scope = "row" attribute when you forget it? Hey, late nights can get to you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 05:16, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Was doing a find and replace experiment. Harder to do the row scopes. Note the "partial" in the edit summary. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 05:36, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

WWBC
There was a hatnote at WKQK saying WMEL redirected there, but WMEL was also used by WWBC. Recently, WMEL was turned into a dab. WWBC was not listed on the dab, so I added it (moving the hatnote). But then I checked and WMEL isn't mentioned in WWBC anymore. It was removed about a year ago by an IP who changed the radio format (unsourced) and removed other sourced content. Since you are the major contributor to this article, can you straighten it out. MB 18:05, 22 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Definitely something changed. Looks like the WMEL outfit ceased to be, maybe in 2018 even. WMEL is an appropriate title to dab... It gets confusing since they called themselves WMEL but moved around on several stations that were not WMEL. Sourcing is nonexistent, and I looked... I had to piece together stuff from Facebook, and there's not much. Station has next to no web presence whatsoever. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 18:20, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I see you tweaked the WMEL dab a bit. But you didn't do anything in WWBC. If you don't want to add a mention back into that article, we should take it out of the dab, right? MB 02:51, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Check the last paragraph of the body, @MB. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 03:24, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I was looking at the edit history, but obviously didn't have the latest version. Sorry. MB 03:42, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for WPNR-FM
Valereee (talk · contribs) 12:03, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

congrats to this, and - more - to your first FA! - today featured Ich will den Kreuzstab gerne tragen, BWV 56! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:35, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for WSCV
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for WHYY-TV
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of KTAR (AM)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article KTAR (AM) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 12:01, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of KTAR (AM)
The article KTAR (AM) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:KTAR (AM) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 12:21, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for KEXP-FM
— Maile (talk) 12:03, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Main page, congratulations! ☆ Bri (talk) 18:11, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * @Bri TFA and DYK at once...Been busy! Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 18:33, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Wow, I missed that. Well, double what I said. ☆ Bri (talk) 19:19, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Courtesy notice
Hello! This is a courtesy notice that you have been nominated for a merchandise giveaway on Meta. Thank you for all that you do! —  Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:12, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Additional edit request for Clayton Morris
Hi Sammi Brie, thank you again for the work you have done on the Clayton Morris article. I recently posted a new edit request that includes some additional content and suggestions. Would you please take a look? I look forward to hearing your input. Thanks, LabradoriteRocks (talk) 19:33, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

DYK for KTVU (Stockton, California)
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

GA stats
Sammi, I noticed this edit since I’m working on a replacement for Legobot (which updates that page). Can I assume you want that same substitution made when the new bot takes over maintaining that data? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 09:35, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Yes,. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 15:39, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks; I'll make the change. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:51, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
 * By the way, @Mike Christie, we're all in your debt for the work you're doing to replace Legobot. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 17:48, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh, and I just realized. If a username change doesn't register in the GA bot stats stack, other users might have missing review credits (A person from Georgia comes to mind immediately). Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 18:03, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

I think this is now fixed. The new bot stats page is going to be User:ChristieBot/GA reviewing stats and it is writing it correctly now. I've put in a couple of other name changes where I saw nominators or reviewers with redirects to a new user page, since those are clearly not intended to be private, but in some cases users would prefer that name changes not be public, so I think from now on I'm only going to put them in on request. The underlying database will keep the old and new names, but it will report the stats for the combined name, if I've been notified about it. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 19:27, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

DYK for J. Elroy McCaw
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 5 November 2022 (UTC) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 10:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup 2022 November newsletter
The 2022 WikiCup has drawn to a close with the final round going down to the wire. The 2022 champion is
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski (1752 points), who won in 2020 and was runner up in both 2019 and last year. In the final round he achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on cue sports. He was closely followed by
 * Bloom6132 (1732), who specialised in "In the news" items and DYKs, and who has reached the final round of the Cup for the past three years. Next was
 * ICS Zulu.svg BennyOnTheLoose (1238), another cue sports enthusiast, also interested in songs, followed by
 * Muboshgu (1082), an "In the news" contributor, a seasoned contestant who first took part in the Cup ten years ago. Other finalists were
 * Transgender Pride flag.svg Sammi Brie (930), who scored with a featured article, good articles and DYKs on TV and radio stations,
 * 🇺🇳 Kavyansh.Singh (370), who created various articles on famous Americans, including an FA on Louis H. Bean, famed for his prediction of election outcomes. Next was
 * PCN02WPS (292), who scored with good articles and DYKs on sporting and other topics and
 * Z1720 (25) who had DYKs on various topics including historic Canadians.

During the WikiCup, contestants achieved 37 featured articles, 349 good articles, 360 featured article reviews, 683 good article reviews and 480 In the news items, so Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors. Well done everyone! All those who reached the final round will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or the overall leader in this field.


 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski wins the featured article prize, for a total of 6 FAs during the course of the competition and 3 in the final round.
 * 🇺🇳 Kavyansh.Singh wins the featured list prize, for 3 FLs in round 2.
 * Pirate Flag of Jack Rackham.svg Adam Cuerden wins the featured picture prize, for 39 FPs during the competition.
 * Z1720 wins the featured article reviewer prize, for 35 FARs in round 4.
 * Epicgenius wins the good article prize, for 32 GAs in round 1.
 * Flag of Provo, Utah (1989–2015).svg SounderBruce wins the featured topic prize, for 4 FT articles in round 1.
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski wins the good topic prize, for 34 GT articles in round 5.
 * Transgender Pride flag.svg Sammi Brie wins the good article reviewer prize, for 71 GARs overall.
 * Transgender Pride flag.svg Sammi Brie wins the Did you know prize, for 30 DYKs in round 3 and 106 overall.
 * Bloom6132 wins the In the news prize, for 106 ITNs in round 5 and 289 overall.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January and possible changes to the rules and scoring are being discussed on the discussion page. You are invited to sign up to take part in the contest; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to have a good turnout for the 2023 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners and finalists, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

DYK for KCCC-TV
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

WikiCup awards


Congratulations on all these awards! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:38, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

DYK for KVUE (California)
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Cardiff Arms Park
You have previously edited Cardiff Arms Park. An editor has decided to split the article (yet again). I would like to know your view on the new edit....see Talk:Cardiff_Arms_Park. Seth Whales  talk  20:19, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Luis Alegre Salazar
Vanamonde93 (talk) 00:02, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

ESPN2 College Football Saturday Primetime
Hi. I've been going through CAT:ALS, and I came across ESPN2 College Football Saturday Primetime. I would think that it doesn't satisfy notability guidelines, as I had a quick look but couldn't find any sources, but I thought I'd ask your opinion. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 02:39, 14 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Without even clicking on it, @AirshipJungleman29, merge it. As a college football fan, there is nothing that distinguishing about the Saturday night ESPN2 game. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 02:57, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Wonderful. Many thanks. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 03:00, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

DYK for KTAR (AM)
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Craig Minervini for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Craig Minervini, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Craig Minervini (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 16 November 2022 (UTC)