User talk:Toffile/Archive 1

Welcome
Hello , and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;. Four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! You 17:31, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

Question on Naming Conventions for Comic Characters.
Three of the primary rogues (Captain Boomerang, Mirror Master, and The Trickster have had 2 incarnations. I'm wondering if I should create new pages for the newer incarnations, or if I should use one page and write about both characters before. Also, would it be a good or bad idea to create a Flash Villain subcategory? The rogue's gallery entry mentions the Flash, however he's the only hero of the four without a subcategory.


 * If the incarnations are seperate people then you should place bios of both versions of the character on the one page, until such a point as they become too unwieldy and a decision is made to split them off onto two pages. If the incarnations are the same basic character, just altered over the course of publishing history and events such as Crisis then follow the examples set by Superman and Batman, both of which are Featured articles. I'm not sure what you'd do with the sub-villain category, so I've asked the questions on your behalf at WikiProject Comics.  See there for responses, and if you haven't joined up as yet, please do and add WikiProject Comics to your watchlist. Steve block  talk 17:51, 1 August 2005 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the heads up on the vandalism. Friday 17:18, 8 August 2005 (UTC)

Thank you for fixing that vandalism. I would hate for people to see that. How did you notice?--David R. Ingham 15:31, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

Comics Collaboration of the Fortnight
As a member of WikiProject Comics, I thought you might be interested in the Comics Collaboration of the Fortnight we have set up. Please feel free to vote on the articles listed, although bear in mind that a vote for a particular article means you are pledging to help improve the article. The goal of the collaboration is to improve articles to Featured Article status, as we feel Comics is under-represented in that area. Thanks for your help. Steve block talk 16:02, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

X-Men collaboration
Hi. You voted at the Comics Collaboration of the Fortnight for X-Men which has become the current collaboration. Please help to improve it in any way you can. --Steve block talk 10:42, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

Spider-Man
Why have you reverted my edit? What's the problem with it? 200.162.245.104 21:59, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
 * "Spiderman also rams Mary-Jane in the ass repeatedly.". Toffile 22:04, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
 * What?? 200.162.245.104 22:05, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
 * this is what I mean. Though it looks like you didn't insert that line into the article. That would be from User:65.193.204.98. --Toffile 22:10, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Sorry, man, got it. I've accidentally revalidated edits. My mistake, sorry. 200.162.245.104 22:11, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
 * No problems. --Toffile 22:15, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Infinite Crisis]/Crisis On Infinite Earths
look, its clear that you love what you do. And its also clear from both your and Tverbeeks discussion threads that you have a bad habit of deleting other peoples contributions without any discussion. that is very uncool. This is a speculative article. How can it be made clearer than the heading of the article. Of course, if the series finishes or it rolls along and my speculation has no merit, I would remove it. But I think putting it under its own seperate section is good comprimise.

You need to work on yourself a bit, learn to live with other people.
 * I'm happy you think so. I try to write, but I spend most of my time cleaning up stuff (candalism, spelling, grammar). I've already responded about my views on what "a speculative article" means.--Toffile 17:38, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

Pro Wrestling WikiProject
Hi Toffile, would you like to join the Pro Wrestling WikiProject?
 * — M o e   ε  00:54, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Samoa Joe b-day
I'm making this work out one way or another. First go to www.talktna.com and put in my password and screename which is Blackhole_Slam and my password is christmas and u should be able to log in. Its rare for me to do this. After the sucessful login then go to this site: http://www.talktna.com/forum/calendar.php?s=&c=1&week=&=2&year=2006 and u should get the information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 700 (talk • contribs)
 * I have. I compared this information to what I found on his official site and discovered there was a difference. I would trust the official site more than a forum for accuracy of information.--Toffile 05:37, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

ok —Preceding unsigned comment added by 700 (talk • contribs)
 * Alright then.--Toffile 05:43, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Hi!
Sorry, I thought this was a new page. Justa as the limited series, metaseries and miniseries. Alone they seem studs, but together they almost look like an article... BTW, have you ever heard the term "metaseries" occidenal comics? Morrison calls his 7 soldairs thing mega series; but I think metaseries is just made up. The according to me, they are just spins-of series or tie-in series. But what do you think?--T for Trouble-maker 02:04, 21 January 2006 (UTC)


 * To be honest, I really hadn't heard of it. However, I really can't disagree with it. Morrison is tying 7 smaller tales within the framework of a larger tale. I can't call it a spinoff because there it's not being spun-off of any existing series. I can't call it a tie-in, because the miniseries are the bulk of the central narrative.--Toffile 02:22, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

Requests for arbitration/Dyslexic Agnostic
Hello,

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Requests for arbitration/Dyslexic Agnostic. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, Requests for arbitration/Dyslexic Agnostic/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Requests for arbitration/Dyslexic Agnostic/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Kelly Martin (talk) 02:41, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * DA = Dyslexic Antagonist... good one! I know it wasn't intentional, but given my recent relations with T-Man, you can't be blamed for such a Freudian slip. :)  Dyslexic agnostic 20:04, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

works for me
good idea!! it would have sounded nicer if you'd have had a more polite sound, though :P --T-man... &quot;&quot;worst vandal ever&quot;&quot; 05:04, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

No problem, man. I can relate to that! Thanks for the advise, I was looking to open a page like that for my projects but I didn't know such thing is possible! So, as long as I know, you hepled me a big deal today!!!!--T-man... &quot;&quot;worst vandal ever&quot;&quot; 05:25, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Kayfabe
Hey. I've noticed you're a pretty avid watchdog of the wrestling pages, as it pertains to the kayfabe rule. Just wondering why you continue to delete matches for PPVs (No Way Out) that were officialy announced on WWE programming outside of the United States. I was under the impression that this is an international site, not simply for American readers. I suggest you regard announcements made on Smackdown as broadcast in Canada and the UK as "official" as when made on American broadcasts. InedibleHulk 06:12, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, I don't have a record of those. I was looking at WWE.com, and they've been tightlipped about No Way Out so far.--Toffile 13:06, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

You don't need to have a record. The fact that I saw it on TV is proof enough that it happened. Unless, of course, you're the absolute and omnipotent moderator of the WWE pages. In that case, I'll humbly apologize. InedibleHulk 07:10, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Requests for arbitration/Dyslexic Agnostic case closed
A final decision has been made in this case and it has been closed. --Tony Sidaway 14:51, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Re: GameFAQs
I am deeply sorry for your troubles; my brother acted too quickly and posted on my name without logging out first. Thanks for taking the time to point this out. MToolen 21:04, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

PLEASE ASSIST, WRESTLING FANS OF WIKIPEDIA
Me and the soon to be departing (hopefully not) Moe Epsilon are setting up a project to deal with the music of this great business. It will be WikiProject Music of wrestling. Join if you are remotely interested - every little helps! Thanks. Kingfisherswift 17:09, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Saud
I've posted the raw code of the box at WP:DRVU. Mackensen (talk) 18:53, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

prod
Hey. Next time instead of using dated prod, just go with subst:prod. The latter will work, the former won't. Thanks. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 03:39, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Reminder
When using template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use &#123;&#123;subst:test&#125;&#125; instead of &#123;{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. — Ian Manka Talk to me‼ 02:37, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Regarding GameFAQs revert
You reverted the intro wording change, saying the new one is clearer. I'm not going to revert war, but I completely disagree. To someone not very familiar with English or gaming, "The systems and games range from the 8-bit Atari days to the next-gen consoles of today." might be thoroughly confused, since there is no prior mention of systems at all. It should definitely be made explicit that it's GF that covers these systems. --Ultimus 15:59, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Hello
Check NARC. -- Steel 20:10, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

I'm so scared...
I know how hard it is for you to live without me, but you'll just have to cope. Also, it's only a semi-wikibreak. Which basically means that instead of being on Wikipedia upwards of 3 hours a day, it'll probably be about half an hour a day. Of course, it's likely that after two days I'll be back on here loads anyway. This place is addictive. -- Steel 19:19, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Cleanup using AWB
Hi. Just a note. Per AutoWikiBrowser one shoud "avoid making insignificant minor edits". Such edits as unicodifying add not value and just clog watchlists, recent changes, and page histories. I would suggest you use AWB only for substantial edits, like spell-checking, typo fixing, etc., and with a relevant edit summary. Wonder what you think. You can reply here. Thanks. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 02:49, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * And note that this is not "bad link repair", it is rather removing of an underscore which makes the link no more no less bad than before. I would think this kind of edits should be avoided too. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 02:50, 23 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Another note: Please do not Unicodify mathematics articles. This topic has been discussed in the Mathematics Project on a number of occasions, always with the conclusion that it is undesirable. Your understanding and cooperation will be appreciated. --KSmrqT 10:59, 23 July 2006 (UTC)


 * (Copied from KSmrq talk) Alright, I wasn't aware of that and it won't happen again. (Actually that's the only article I have on my watchlist that fits under WikiProject:Math) I was wondering if you had a link to the decision though. I'd like to see the reasoning behind it.--Toffile 15:08, 23 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I forgot to mention that you should reply here on your own talk page, to keep the thread of the conversation in one place. When I post a message I (temporarily) add your user talk page to my watch list so I'll know if you reply.
 * For the reasoning, start here and follow the links provided by Paul August. --KSmrqT 18:31, 23 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Alright, thanks.--Toffile 18:33, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Fine
That's ok. I did it because what's to discuss?, that's the guideline and the OFICIAL convention. Or what, are we going to discuss every time a user does soething against guidelines and conventions? Where do we previously know each other from, again?... sorry bad memory.--T-man, the wise 03:20, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Well, check this mess out: Clock King, you think you need consensus about that? The editor who did that clearly confused the character with the episode named after him. In the other cases DA did it against previous advices from Josiah Rowe and Chaosworks claiming there is a convention that he made up, when the actual convention Naming Convention (televition) points the opposite. Previously, those articles had proper names, I'm almost tempted to believe he did it as part of his doubtfully good faithed "monitoring" over my activities (he happened to decide to go do massive edits against mine the very same day I started editing there) An oddly coincidental clash, but let's say it was in "good faith" towards what in his mind is good for the article, he knew he was wrong has no backing for his edits and clained a non existant one.--T-man, the wise 03:38, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Harpur's Ferry
Hi there. I noticed you set up the redirect for Harpur's Ferry to Binghamton University. I'm thinking of moving the Harpur's Ferry info out of Binghamton University and killing the redirect. An all-volunteer student-run ambulance service seems likely to be unique enough to merit its own article, and the main article is getting pretty long. What do you think? --Tcatts 16:32, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Today's featured article
Tobacman 00:39, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:Nuvola Firefox icon.png
Hello Toffile, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Nuvola Firefox icon.png) was found at the following location: User:Toffile. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 02:56, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia New York Meet-Up
Howdy! Please come to the First Annual New York Wikipedian Central Park Picnic. R.S.V.P. @ Meetup/NYC --David Shankbone 18:36, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:PennyPlunderer(Kane).JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:PennyPlunderer(Kane).JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:04, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:PennyPlunderer(Nolan).jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:PennyPlunderer(Nolan).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:04, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

My RfA
Hey there, I'm writing to inform you that I have withdrawn my request for adminship, which was currently standing at 11 supports, 22 opposes and 6 neutrals. This count could have been so much better if I had understood policy, although I believe that 17 questions is a lot to ask of a user's first RfA. I will take on all comments given at the RfA and will endeavour to meet the high expectations of the RfA voters. WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN play it cool.  21:46, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

MONGO RfA
Hey there. This edit was stupid and I would like to apologize for it. Have a nice day. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 08:31, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

sup
sup NickBush24 19:50, August 16, 2005 (UTC)


 * nm here either NickBush24 20:05, August 16, 2005 (UTC)

The room's okay, but my roomie hasn't shown up yet, since freshmen don't move in until tomorrow.

*crosses fingers and hopes he doesn't show up* >_> NickBush24 21:29, August 17, 2005 (UTC)

Trickster (comics) Response
I got your message and it seems I can't find the Webmaster's E-Mail. --Rtkat3 talk 9:25, 30 October 2005

lol
lol - Marvo

Binghamton Pictures
I appreciate your thoughts on having too many pictures. Perhaps one solution would be to spread them out. You see, my main concern is that the current pictures are particularly bad pictures. I have many more flattering images that I think could look really good, and also better the school's image if we used them. I'm not very well versed though, perhaps I could give them to you and you could tinker with placing them into the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Greynol1 (talk • contribs) 10:23, 13 June 2006

Watching me?
Watching my revision history? You are annoying. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.165.250.81 (talk • contribs) 14:53, 14 June 2006

My RfA
''' Announcement: It's an administrator! '''

Toffile, thanks for your support on my request for adminship.

The final outcome was a robust 62/1/1, so I am now an administrator. If you ever have any questions about my actions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Thanks again, Chris Griswold

My Rfa
My effort to regain adminship was unsuccessful, But I wanted to thank you for taking some time out of your day to voice your opinion.--MONGO 19:19, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Rollback
I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see New admin school/Rollback and Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 02:07, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of Harpur's Ferry for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harpur's Ferry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Harpur's Ferry until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BDD (talk) 23:34, 6 November 2013 (UTC)