User talk:TonyTheTiger/Archive 43

Note to self
The following images need to have their licensing fixed:


 * File:20070520_Lifesize_Darth_Vader_at_Lego_Store.JPG
 * File:20070601 University of Chicago Law Library CowParade.JPG
 * File:20070601 University of Chicago Law Library CowParade (2).JPG
 * File:20070605 BFFerguson Fountain of the Great Lakes.JPG
 * File:20090619 Hadid pavilion.JPG
 * File:20090619 Sui Jianguo's Windy City Dinosaur at Boeing Galleries.JPG

1st Millennium Park TFA
Looks like Raul chose Cloud Gate to be the TFA for February 9. First of many, hopefully! -- T orsodo g Talk 18:29, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 22:23, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:501707845 54c96d326a o.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:501707845 54c96d326a o.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 00:32, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Newsbank
Are the searches working for you? I can't seem to access most of the site for some reason; I could just fine until today, so hopefully they aren't trying to block people out. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 21:00, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Source request
Can you find the 1998 and 2000 Grammy Award for Best Traditional Pop Vocal Album nominees in Newsbank? Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 23:48, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * That's unfortunate (I had wrongly assumed you subscribed to it). Do you know of any good place I can find a reliable source for that information? Dabomb87 (talk) 23:53, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

February GA Sweeps update
Thanks to everyone's efforts to the GA Sweeps process, we are currently over 95% done with around 130 articles left to be swept! Currently there are over 50 members participating in Sweeps, that averages out to about 3 articles per person! If each member reviews an article once a week this month (or several!), we'll be completely finished. At that point, awards will be handed out to reviewers. Per my message last month, although we did not review 100 articles last month, I still made a donation of $90 (we had 90 reviews completed/initiated) to Wikipedia Forever on behalf of all GA Sweeps reviewers. I would like to thank everyone's efforts for last month, and ask for additional effort this month so we can be finished. I know you have to be sick of seeing these updates (as well as Sweeps itself) by now, so please do consider reviewing a few articles if you haven't reviewed in a while. If you have any questions about reviews or Sweeps let me know and I'll be happy to get back to you. Again, thank you for taking the time to help with the process, I appreciate your efforts! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 02:46, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Walter Chin
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Walter Chin. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Walter Chin. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:17, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

File:19580428 Walter O'Malley Time Magazine Cover.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:19580428 Walter O'Malley Time Magazine Cover.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Damiens .rf 16:01, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Congrats on Cloudgate
A well deserved TFA!

I visited Chicago last week (my "hometown") and was thinking that I might bring up the number of photos in National Register of Historic Places listings in Chicago to a level where I could say "Tony, get a couple of folks to spend a weekend and make the list "fully illustrated" " Well, not quite - I'm uploading about 20, but there's something like 50-60 left to go. Given Chicago's place in modern architecture it certainly deserves to be "fully illustrated." Maybe when I visit again next year!

Again, congrats.

Smallbones (talk) 01:04, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 03:35, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

FAC
I will take a look at Inauguration of Barack Obama agin today and weigh in on the fac - thanks for the reminder, and congrats again on Cloud Gate's day in the sun. Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 13:50, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Newsbank
Did something change with Newsbank? I'm not able to find a search function anymore. Is something different or am I nuts? -- T orsodo g Talk 14:30, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK problem
Hello! Your submission of College Sports Information Directors of America at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --MaxEspinho (talk) 10:25, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Joe Cada
I have reviewed the article Joe Cada that you nominated for Good Article status, and left a number of comments on the talk page. Most of the improvements concern technical terms and several very minor points. Once these have been dealt with, I can happily promote the article to GA. Cheers -- Big  Dom  19:41, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Inauguration of Barack Obama FAC4
Posted a response on the FAC4 page regarding your request. Just to let you know, I'm unable to get here as often given time constraints with work (full-time), family and graduate school (2 classes).  → Lwalt ♦ talk 22:16, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Nobel Prize GA
Hey!

I just answered your last remaining issues. There is some I don't understand with the Captions. If you have time plaese take a look :) --Esuzu (talk • contribs) 08:58, 13 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Hey. I just wanted to say thanks for being patient for me on the GA review. I know it must be hard with people who don't know much (like me). I learnt a lot. And by the way, you seem to have written some FA's and know your way around here; do you know how long Nobel Prize has to becoming an FA? Do you have any suggestions of what should be done? If you have time I would be very happy if you can advise! --Esuzu (talk • contribs) 16:56, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your answer. I will indeed try to put it up for FAC then soon :) Cheers--Esuzu (talk • contribs) 14:50, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:20100108_SNGWizard_tournament_view.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:20100108_SNGWizard_tournament_view.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:25, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

File:20100108_SNGWizard_game_view.jpg
I have tagged File:20100108_SNGWizard_game_view.jpg as orphaned fairuse. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:27, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

File:20100108_SNGWizard_quiz_mode.jpg
I have tagged File:20100108_SNGWizard_quiz_mode.jpg as orphaned fairuse. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:29, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 13:49, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:20090814 closed van Berkel Pavilion.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:20090814 closed van Berkel Pavilion.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:38, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:20090807 Hadid Pavilion at night.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:20090807 Hadid Pavilion at night.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:38, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:PT3 database.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PT3 database.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:38, 16 February 2010 (UTC)


 * If you adjust, the line in the {[tl|information}}} to say you created it with software rather than stating you created it

ENTIRELY yourself, this can be resolved quickly.. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:45, 16 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Resolved.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:49, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Conflicted licensing on image File:Boeing North Gallery'.jpg
The above noted image or media file appears to have conflicted licensing. As an image cannot be both 'free' and 'unfree', a check of the exact status of this media/image concerned is advised. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:38, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Your message
I've signed the postings you make reference to.

I will NOT stop adding warnings about images though, the warnings will stop when the issues are resolved. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:38, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:20090814 Zaha Hadid pavilion banner during grand opening.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:20090814 Zaha Hadid pavilion banner during grand opening.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:41, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Pokerstars 20051215 Check.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Pokerstars 20051215 Check.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:47, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

File:TonyTheTigrr Real Money history.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:TonyTheTigrr Real Money history.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:53, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

File:PokerTracker_screen_print.jpg
Image cleanup request. Given the issue is the same as the previous (resolved) PUI, it can be resolved quickly :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:59, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Images
In relation to image notes, there's no need to let me know they've been resolved for each image. I tend to check back on past taggings so will note fixed ones.

Once resolved you can also remove the relevant warnings from your talk page.

Thanks for the fast response, BTW.. It's better than "some" up-loaders I've had to deal with :( Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:03, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:20081117 Barack Obama Streetlight Banner.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:20081117 Barack Obama Streetlight Banner.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Possibly unfree File:20081117 Barack Obama Streetsign Banner.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:20081117 Barack Obama Streetsign Banner.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Possibly unfree File:20080913 Joffrey Tower Opening Weekend Pointe Shoe Exhibit.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:20080913 Joffrey Tower Opening Weekend Pointe Shoe Exhibit.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

New nugget of info on BP Bridge
Hey. I was doing some research on the Agora sculpture in Grant Park and found a new nugget of info on the BP Pedestrian Bridge. It seems that, at some point, there was a proposal for the sculptor of Agora to design a giant sculpture of a hand at the end of the BP Bridge.

I haven't found much information about the plan, beyond a brief mention in a Tribune article (Noreen S. Ahmed. "Future art in the park ; 106-piece sculpture by Polish artist is on its way to Grant Park". Chicago Tribune. September 27, 2006. 1.) But I thought you might be interested. Zagalejo^^^ 09:18, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:1926 view of Grant Park Peristyle.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:1926 view of Grant Park Peristyle.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:13, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Pre-Millennium Park Grant Park.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Pre-Millennium Park Grant Park.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:14, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:20080602 Park Grill with Cloud Gate.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:20080602 Park Grill with Cloud Gate.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:20, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:20080602 Millennium Monument.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:20080602 Millennium Monument.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:33, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:IMG 2108.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IMG 2108.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:39, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Aerial view of University of Michigan bl000076 bhl.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Aerial view of University of Michigan bl000076 bhl.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:42, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Conflicted licensing on image File:Germany Schulz.jpg
The above noted image or media file appears to have conflicted licensing. As an image cannot be both 'free' and 'unfree', a check of the exact status of this media/image concerned is advised.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:45, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Willard Motley.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Willard Motley.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:04, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:McCarthy Building image2.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:McCarthy Building image2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:32, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Jackson-Rusesabagina.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Jackson-Rusesabagina.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:37, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:20080409 Blackstone Hotel Lobby2.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:20080409 Blackstone Hotel Lobby2.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:41, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:20080409 Blackstone Hotel Lobby.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:20080409 Blackstone Hotel Lobby.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:46, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:20070307 Buffalo Common Council Districts.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:20070307 Buffalo Common Council Districts.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:40, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

File:20080305 Buffalo City Tower.JPG missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:20080305 Buffalo City Tower.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:08, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Don Dufek.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Don Dufek.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:13, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Alvin Wistert.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Alvin Wistert.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:05, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Dean Dingman.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Dean Dingman.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:07, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Thom Darden.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Thom Darden.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:09, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Julius Franks.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Julius Franks.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:11, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Bump Elliott.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Bump Elliott.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:14, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Ed Muransky.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Ed Muransky.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:James Pace.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:James Pace.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:17, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:George Lilja.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:George Lilja.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:18, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Ted Petoskey.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Ted Petoskey.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:19, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Richard Rifenburg.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Richard Rifenburg.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:20, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Greg Skrepenak.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Greg Skrepenak.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:22, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Chicago021.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Chicago021.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:26, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Chicago020.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chicago020.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:32, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Chicago018.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chicago018.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:35, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Walnut room.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Walnut room.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:37, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:20080228 Ellicott Square Building (8).JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:20080228 Ellicott Square Building (8).JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:40, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:20080228 Ellicott Square Building (9).JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:20080228 Ellicott Square Building (9).JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:43, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:20080228 Ellicott Square Building (7).JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:20080228 Ellicott Square Building (7).JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:46, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:20071117 Art of the Can first place.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:20071117 Art of the Can first place.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:06, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:20071117 Art of Can third place.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:20071117 Art of Can third place.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:11, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:20071117 Art of the-Can second place.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:20071117 Art of the-Can second place.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:14, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

File:UofM 1882 Baseball team with Moses Fleetwood Walker.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:UofM 1882 Baseball team with Moses Fleetwood Walker.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Conflicted licensing on image File:20071029 Man Enters the Cosmos.JPG
The above noted image or media file appears to have conflicted licensing. As an image cannot be both 'free' and 'unfree', a check of the exact status of this media/image concerned is advised.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:21, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:20070701 Man Enters The Cosmos.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:20070701 Man Enters The Cosmos.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:21, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:20070919 Pritzker Pavilion bandshell.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:20070919 Pritzker Pavilion bandshell.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:27, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:20070913 iPod 5-6 Gen side-by-side.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:20070913 iPod 5-6 Gen side-by-side.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:31, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:20070906 De La Salle Institute Sign.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:20070906 De La Salle Institute Sign.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:40, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:20070808 Flair House.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:20070808 Flair House.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:41, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of David Sills (American football)


The article David Sills (American football) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Should be deleted under WP:BLP1E.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 18:13, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Conflicted licensing on image File:20070624 Project for a Monument (Moon, Sun and One Star).JPG
The above noted image or media file appears to have conflicted licensing. As an image cannot be both 'free' and 'unfree', a check of the exact status of this media/image concerned is advised.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:16, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:20070621 North McCormick Court Sculptures.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:20070621 North McCormick Court Sculptures.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:40, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:20070622 McClintock Court Fountain.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:20070622 McClintock Court Fountain.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:44, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Conflicted licensing on image File:20070605 South McCormick Court Fountains.JPG
The above noted image or media file appears to have conflicted licensing. As an image cannot be both 'free' and 'unfree', a check of the exact status of this media/image concerned is advised.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:56, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Conflicted licensing on image File:20070605 Smith - Cubi VII.JPG
The above noted image or media file appears to have conflicted licensing. As an image cannot be both 'free' and 'unfree', a check of the exact status of this media/image concerned is advised.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:05, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

FACs
The FAC-instructions were recently changed; nominators are now no longer allowed to have multiple FACs open at any time, so perhaps you should remove your new nomination from FAC for the time being. Ucucha 21:09, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Paul Cornell.JPG missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Paul Cornell.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:18, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Hyde Park House.JPG missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Hyde Park House.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:22, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Cornell Estate.JPG missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Cornell Estate.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:24, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

File:20061105 Evanston Argo Tea.JPG missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:20061105 Evanston Argo Tea.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:28, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Blackstone Lobby
The concern was that Interior design can have protectable artistic elements in it, and I wasn't sure if FoP applied to 'interior' spaces and 'architectural' features, in the same way as it can be applied to exteriors.

Thanks for updating the licensing on other images I have queried BTW Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:37, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:20070110 Rock & Roll McDonald's (9).JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:20070110 Rock & Roll McDonald's (9).JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:19, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:20070110 Rock & Roll McDonald's (10).JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:20070110 Rock & Roll McDonald's (10).JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:20070110 Rock & Roll McDonald's (11).JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:20070110 Rock & Roll McDonald's (11).JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:03, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:20070530 35 East Wacker Clock.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:20070530 35 East Wacker Clock.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:16, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:20070110 Charter One Pavillion Sign.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:20070110 Charter One Pavillion Sign.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:17, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

File:20070110 Soldier Field Bronze Mural (1).JPG
Hi, can you provide some more information (such as an artist or date?), as the linked article doesn't seem to mention the mural. Perhaps the article needs expansion on this as well?

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:25, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:20070122 Central Station Model from Museum Campus Sales Center.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:20070122 Central Station Model from Museum Campus Sales Center.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:52, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:20070122 Central Station Model from Museum Park Sales Center.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:20070122 Central Station Model from Museum Park Sales Center.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:55, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:20070122 Near South Side Model from Museum Park Sales Center.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:20070122 Near South Side Model from Museum Park Sales Center.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:56, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Calder-Polychrome and Horizontal Bluebird.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Calder-Polychrome and Horizontal Bluebird.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:02, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Johns-In Memory of My Feelings - Frank O'Hara.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Johns-In Memory of My Feelings - Frank O'Hara.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:06, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Summer 2006 CD Label.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Summer 2006 CD Label.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:54, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

User:TonyTheTiger/Photographs
Hi Tony, for some reason this page is appearing in the Image Database Reports as having eight non-free images on it. Since non-free images aren't allowed in userspace, these will have to go, but there are so many images on the page I guess you'd probably know which ones haven't got free licences (having said that, if it's a gallery of your own images, why have any got non-free tags at all? Or is it a glitch in the report?) Black Kite 22:06, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * OK that makes sense, no problem. Black Kite 22:15, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

WP:CHICAGO
Hello, TonyTheTiger. I have two things to talk to you about regarding WP:CHICAGO.


 * 1)I noticed that you marked yourself as manager/director of WikiProject Chicago. From my expertise I understand that only coordinators aprise a roll in directing the project to where it needs to go. Even then, there is no hierarchy and/or leadership. By assuming manager/director you assume hierarchy and leadership.
 * 2)That aside, YOU will be featured in my WikiProject report to go to press sometime in April. The questions are located here. Please only answer the BOTTOM questions, as I am working on a report on WikiProject Mammals as well.


 * Thanks ever so much,


 * Belugaboy Talk to Me! 00:49, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Congrats!
I just saw the Inauguaration made FA! Congratulations, Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 01:19, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Let me add to the congratulations brigade....

FAC
I've struck a few comments. But really, I'd advise you to withdraw, and start another peer review. I think the article still needs a lot of work. Zagalejo^^^ 07:35, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I was not aware of it, thanks for the heads up. I am pretty busy right now - not sure when I can take a look at it, may be a few days. Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 16:30, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

I'll take a look soon. Just wondering, is there any reason I can't simply delete my comments pertaining to resolved issues? I think that would make it easier for you to see the outstanding issues. Zagalejo^^^ 06:05, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, it doesn't seem like most of my concerns have been addressed, anyway. But when they are, would it be OK if I move the resolved issues to a subpage? I'm just trying to make things easier for you. I'm afraid that some of my comments will get lost in the thicket. Zagalejo^^^ 08:59, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Victoria's Secret Fashion Show
Hey Tony. I've conducted a GAN review for Victoria's Secret Fashion Show. Please take a look at your convenience. Also, congrats on the FA passing for Inauguration of Barack Obama! I see now that it's been quite a journey for you getting it to FA. Well done! —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  16:18, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem. That works out well for you with the Wikicup anyway, so it's probably all for the best. I've been following your work on Joe Cada from the start, so I'm glad to see it progressing through the GA stage. If I can be of any help in that one, let me know. —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  16:51, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 12:53, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Ice rink
Aye aye sir. You are welcome, by the way. Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 17:27, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Two reference problems: 1) Through 2008, the ice rink was one of those operated as part of the parks on ice program by the Chicago Park District.[31] - the ref is to the current CPD page, which says nothing about running the MP rink. I went by your version and the accessdate and added 2008. Is this OK? I could not find the old page on the Internet Archive. 2) When it was originally planned in 2000, the ice rink was intended to replace activities that were then known as "Skate on State".[43] but ref 43 says nothing about Skate on State. Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 01:11, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * FOund this about the Park District operating the rink in 2006 here Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 02:26, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, will copy this to the FAC page. Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 03:54, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Do you want me to try and copyedit the article to address Zagalejo's remaining concerns? Could do it tomorrow. Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 03:10, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Non Free Files in your User Space
Hey there TonyTheTiger, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free files are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some files that I found on User:TonyTheTiger. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.


 * See a log of files removed today here.


 * Shut off the bot here.


 * Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:03, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Chicago A-Class review?
Hello TonyTheTiger! I noticed that you're the Chicago project coordinator, so could you please advise me on whether I can get an A-class review for Benet Academy? If so, how do I get the article nominated? (I'm new to this process, so I have absolutely no idea what I'm doing...) Benny the mascot (talk) 16:14, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Academic All-America
Hi Tony- Thanks for creating the 2010 NCAA Men's Basketball All-Americans page. I like that you added the academic AA teams - I will go back and add them to the historical pages too. One question - would you have an issue if I removed the "college division" teams? We don't currently list the non-D1 All-America teams so it seems a bit out of place. I also may play around with the format if you're OK with that. Thanks again Rikster2 (talk) 14:22, 28 February 2010 (UTC)