User talk:Voortle

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Lockdown drill into Safety drill. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 02:32, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pic N' Save
Hello Voortle,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pic N' Save for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Timothy Joseph Wood 15:33, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pic N' Save (Northeast Florida store chain)


The article Pic N' Save (Northeast Florida store chain) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:52, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

A word listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect A word. Since you had some involvement with the A word redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 16:56, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve 271 (number)
Hi, I'm Domdeparis. Voortle, thanks for creating 271 (number)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. please add sources to back up what you wrote and show this meets WP:WINI

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Dom from Paris (talk) 09:17, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry this should have gone to another editors page who removed the redirect. Dom from Paris (talk) 09:18, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of 271 (number) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 271 (number) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/271 (number) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 14:54, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

1,000,000,000,000,000 AD listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 1,000,000,000,000,000 AD. Since you had some involvement with the 1,000,000,000,000,000 AD redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Pkbwcgs (talk) 22:45, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

1,000,000,000 AD listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 1,000,000,000 AD. Since you had some involvement with the 1,000,000,000 AD redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Pkbwcgs (talk) 22:49, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

1,000,000,000,000 AD listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 1,000,000,000,000 AD. Since you had some involvement with the 1,000,000,000,000 AD redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Pkbwcgs (talk) 22:50, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

1,000,000 AD listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 1,000,000 AD. Since you had some involvement with the 1,000,000 AD redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Pkbwcgs (talk) 22:52, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

10^40 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 10^40. Since you had some involvement with the 10^40 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. B dash (talk) 02:34, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

"Escaping the Earth" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Escaping the Earth. Since you had some involvement with the Escaping the Earth redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:16, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

"Colonization of the Sun" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Colonization of the Sun. Since you had some involvement with the Colonization of the Sun redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC  678  18:22, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

"Yellow dwarf colonization" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Yellow dwarf colonization. Since you had some involvement with the Yellow dwarf colonization redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 09:32, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

"Phuck" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Phuck. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 28 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 10:56, 28 June 2020 (UTC) == "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you." listed at Redirects for discussion == A discussion is taking place to address the redirect You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you.. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 12 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Interstellarity (talk) 02:05, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

"2590s" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 2590s. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 6 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tavix ( talk ) 21:23, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

"−10" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect −10. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 31 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 13:35, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Venusians for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Venusians is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Venusians& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:58, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

"4570s" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 4570s and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 20 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 21:41, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

A very large number of your "nth century" redirects listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with many of your redirects of the format "nth century" and has thus listed them for discussion. These discussions will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 28, Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 28, Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 28 and Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 28 until consensuses are reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC   678   00:48, 28 August 2022 (UTC), edited 14:16, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

"Colonization of other universes" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Colonization_of_other_universes&redirect=no Colonization of other universes] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 05:53, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of My Teacher Ate My Homework


The article My Teacher Ate My Homework has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Appears to fail WP:NFILM. No reviews from Reliable Sources found. Tagged for notability"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donald D23  talk to me  23:14, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of My Teacher Ate My Homework for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article My Teacher Ate My Homework is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/My Teacher Ate My Homework until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Donald D23  talk to me  10:41, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

"287 (Number)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=287_(Number)&redirect=no 287 (Number)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Dhrm77 (talk) 16:43, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

"Colonization of the Sun (Lagrange Points)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Colonization_of_the_Sun_(Lagrange_Points)&redirect=no Colonization of the Sun (Lagrange Points)] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Thryduulf (talk) 22:31, 28 January 2024 (UTC)