Wikipedia:WikiProject North Carolina/Peer review

{| border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" style="background: transparent;"
 * valign="top" |
 * valign="top" |

General guidelines for peer review are found on the Peer review/guidelines page. This entails putting the on the talk page of the article.

There are other types of peer reviews, including:
 * WP:Good Articles, initiated by adding the template on the Talk page
 * WP:Featured article review,
 * WP:Featured list review,
 * WP:Featured image review,
 * WP:Featured topic review,

When requesting a Good article review, a topic is required. Topics do not include North Carolina, so one of the following topics should be selected:
 * Agriculture, food and drink · Art and architecture · Computing and engineering · Transport · Geography · Places · World history · Royalty, nobility and heraldry · Language and literature · Mathematics and mathematicians · Film · Television · Media and drama · Albums · Songs · Music · Biology and medicine · Chemistry and materials science · Earth sciences · Physics and astronomy · Philosophy and religion · Culture, sociology and psychology · Education · Economics and business · Law · Magazines and print journalism · Politics and government · Sports and recreation · Video games · Warfare

The page Wikipedia:WikiProject North Carolina/Article alerts shows the alerts for North Carolina articles requiring peer review and other actions. It includes the following:

Draft guidelines for North Carolina Project B Class articles
Editors can self-assess articles against the (five B-class criteria listed below) up to and including C-Class. If you have made significant improvements to an article against one or more of B-class criteria and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below, specifying which criteria you have worked on. If you feel unable to assess against one or more of the B-class criteria, please say so when posting. Requests for formal A-Class review should be made at the review department.
 * B1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations.
 * B2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies.
 * B3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content.
 * B4. It is free from major grammatical errors.
 * B5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams

Notes: