Talk:Anti-Leninism

(unnecessary?)
What's a russai?

this article seems unneccesary, there is no "anti nazi" page or somthing, the parties who oppose lenin have already been noted.Zhukov 19:12, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I think it's a good article as it collects all the relevant information in one section and deal with opposition from both sides of the politicla spectrum, and there may not be an anti nazism page but there is a Anti-fascism and an Anti-communism page.


 * True, but lenin was a communist. But fair enough i suppose, it isnt worth deleting i jsut think its a tad unnessesary. Zhukov 15:15, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * That's a fair point but I always take the view that seeing as wikipedia is on the internet there is no real need to delete pages that, although would not make a regular encyaeclopedia, are not factually incorrect or wholly useless.--Horses In The Sky 18:35, 28 June 2006 (UTC)


 * I believe that this article is only useless because it has not been expanded. Perhaps if more detail were ventured into the post-1924 Anti-Leninism section, this article would carry increased usefulness. Lincoln187 12:07, 17 November 2006 (UTC)


 * I think the content is good, but the topic is incohereht, so that the argument that there is no "anti nazi" page remains: having an article on an incoherent topic that is dependent on information from outside the article, is not a good idea, but rather a potential cause of confusions. I think instead the article contents should be redistributed to various places within Leninism, and if that article becomes too big, that article should be split into subtopics that are coherent. Rursus dixit. ( m bork3 !) 09:02, 25 May 2010 (UTC)


 * I agree the topic is incoherent. There is no thing, no movement, called "anti-Leninism", whereas there are movements called "anti-fascism", "anti-communism", "anti-capitalism" or "anti-Stalinism". "Anti-Leninism" is more like "anti-vegetarianism" or "anti-conservatism": plenty of people are against vegetarianism or against conservatism, but there have not been definable, visible movements or organisations that describe themselves as such or are described as such by others. BobFromBrockley (talk) 09:54, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Scope
The aforementioned scope issues haven't been addressed in the last decade. It would be sufficient to address opposition to Lenin's platform in a section of the existing Leninism article. For instance, its coverage of Trotsky's opposition is sufficient. I don't see anything I'd immediately merge from this article. czar 01:15, 17 April 2022 (UTC)