Talk:Geothermal energy in Turkey

Needs expert on CO2 reinjection
So is it like Italy where only half the CO2 can be reinjected? Chidgk1 (talk) 19:50, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

new report
http://www.jeotermaletki.com/en/announcement/2019/final-best-practice-guide-has-been-published more could be added from this

Adoption of binary cycle plants ?
The article does not currently make it clear how many of the existing plants (if any) are binary cycle. This seems highly relevant given that the geothermal fluids are unusually high in CO2. If plants are binary cycle, I understand this means that geothermal fluids are returned to the reservoir and are not released to atmosphere. This would presumably mean negligible CO2 emissions ? This point about flash plants versus binary plants seems worth covering in the article.Marshelec (talk) 07:08, 5 July 2021 (UTC)


 * added ratio Chidgk1 (talk) 08:45, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Map of Power Plants
Created a map (below) and Data.map dataset on Commons to show the geothermal plants in Turkey. I propose added this kind of map to the article. The plants shown are from the "Global Power Plant Database" v1.3.0. More plants can be added into this dataset by editing the Geojson with lat/long and labels. Any comments?

I saw your request from 29 June 2022 at the GL/Map workshop. Created this type of data-driven map to meet your requirements. Let me know if you need any help. - DutchTreat (talk) 12:56, 30 March 2023 (UTC)


 * @DutchTreat Excellent thanks very much I have added it. Is it possible to show the names of the plants without having to click on them? Chidgk1 (talk) 13:13, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't see an option in maplink to add a display label without the click. Sorry. It is possible to change the fill color or marker type. DutchTreat (talk) 14:49, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * A traditional static map gives more creative control over the label placements. However, the maintenance cost is higher and a bit more difficult to verify. If you would prefer a static map, we can discuss. DutchTreat (talk) 14:57, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * @DutchTreat It is hard to know whether there will be many new geothermal power plants in future. At the moment it seems unlikely so a static map might be best. But let’s wait until after the election in May to be sure - I guess there is a small possibility a new government might radically revise energy policy. So I will likely ping you in June to get your opinion both on this map and the static maps I have in some other articles. I don’t have any graphics skills but happy to do some donkey work with your advice. Thanks for your help so far and I hope to be in touch later to pick your brains Chidgk1 (talk) 06:59, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Glad to help. Ping me when you want to talk in more detail. DutchTreat (talk) 20:37, 1 May 2023 (UTC)