Talk:Romancing SaGa

Untitled
Note: the GameFAQs release data says that this game was released in the US in 1992, but I can find no other evidence of this, so I will exclude it from the article itself. Y0u (Y0ur talk page) (Y0ur contributions) 14:18, July 26, 2005 (UTC)

It was never released in the US. Gamefaqs is often wrong on those -- for instance, the other day I bought game that GF doesn't list as haveing a US release. Melodia Chaconne 15:01, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

Heh. I've seen several of those.. Anyway, I am rather looking forward to the release of Romancing SaGa 3 in the US.. If they ever get around to it. The story was much easier to get into than RS1. RS1 just kinda throws you into the water and lets you see if you swim or not. I've heard(though I don't have any actual experience to support this) that RS-2 was the best in the series.--Vercalos 09:50, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Your English cast list is 100% wrong except for Patrick Seitz. How sad.

Expanding the 'Plot' - Backstory and Characters' Main Quest Summaries
In hoping to better expand this article for this awesome game (the PS2 remake, more specifically, as I have not played the original SNES version at all), I was thinking that one of the first steps I should do is expand the "plot" section. Including, for example, revising what is already typed in the article, as the plot that is currently typed here is just a direct copying of what was typed in the game's intruction manual, and not properly cited at all.

Also, planning to include short introductory descriptions for each of the main playable characters which will tell how/why they have been involved in the events of the game's conflicts (without giving spoilers). I know that there is already a separate article for the long list of characters who appear in the game, but I am thinking that at least the eight playable characters should be described on this main article.

Another idea being to change the heading "Plot" to instead read "Story".

I was advised that expanding this article would be more appropriate than creating a new article for the PS2 remake, so I will see what I can do for this. What I am hoping, possibly from any others here that might know better, that if anything I will add soon to this article is exclusive to the PS2 remake (either new story part or a new feature) that it be pointed out so we can get it fixed. - Tydrian 23:16, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Wonderswan
This Romancing SaGa game was not released for Wonderswan, SaGa 1 was released for Wonderswan: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Final_Fantasy_Legend

Ultimania development information currently not in the article
The following sources should be translated and used to expand the current incomplete article:


 * Romancing SaGa: Minstrel Song Ultimania
 * Scenario & Planner Team Interview
 * Battle Team Interview
 * Graphic Team Interview
 * Kenji Ito Interview


 * Ultimania Website
 * Romancing SaGa: Minstrel Song Ultimania Staff Comments

Anyone willing to help translate even one page is welcome! Jonathan Hardin&#39; (talk) 08:02, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Updated the links. Jonathan Hardin&#39; (talk) 19:46, 20 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Source for translations for some of the Ultimania content. --ProtoDrake (talk) 13:51, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on Romancing SaGa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090621232858/http://www.gameinformer.com:80/NR/exeres/7AF8BEDE-465D-4D41-B65A-E032AC8701D6.htm to http://www.gameinformer.com/NR/exeres/7AF8BEDE-465D-4D41-B65A-E032AC8701D6.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080605182000/http://www.the-magicbox.com:80/game20060306.shtml to http://www.the-magicbox.com/game20060306.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 22:45, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Romancing SaGa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110927074018/http://na.square-enix.com/games/romancingsaga/ to http://na.square-enix.com/games/romancingsaga/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 03:48, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Romancing SaGa: Minstrel Song should get its own page
Almost all of the major remakes have their own page, this includes Square Enix remakes like Final Fantasy VII Remake and Trials of Mana (2020 video game). Considering that the remake has enough information to get its own page and it will be getting a remaster this year just like Tactics Ogre: Let Us Cling Together (2010 video game), which is also a remake, we should make a separate entry for Minstrel Song too. I wanted to get a consensus before making any changes. Phillyphil99 (talk) 02:49, 11 August 2022 (UTC) If no one has any other objections, then I will go ahead with the move then. Phillyphil99 (talk) 20:01, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Support - A remake that is significantly different from the original absolutely should get its own page since it is noteworthy enough to deserve it. WaraWaraPlaza (talk) 04:09, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Support - If all the remakes have their own page then this should too. I'm okay with the move and it should go ahead if no one else disagrees. VortexLover (talk) 03:42, 15 August 2022 (UTC)


 * pinging (who objected to the split the first time) and  (from the above GA review)  Just ' i ' yaya  10:43, 21 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Oppose, there isn't enough mechanical difference between the two, compared to VII Remake or Tactics Ogre PSP or Trials of Mana which each saw substantial mechanical/narrative/m&n changes. Just because a pre-existing remake's been ported to another system doesn't automatically qualify it for a split. Also, just a comment, but all three users who proposed/support this split came into existence around the same time and have very similar ways of writing their messages/page descriptions, so I'm skeptical of the supports above. --ProtoDrake (talk) 12:23, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Notice: Phillyphil99, WaraWaraPlaza and VortexLover are CU confirmed sockpuppets of AquillaXIII, who has previously used sockpuppets to support their own split discussions. -- ferret (talk) 22:55, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy close per ferret. No non-sock user supports this, including myself. Axem Titanium (talk) 05:13, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Translation does not "require" original cartridge
The article cited only says that to cover the sites collective bums legally. Technologically, a downloaded ROM would work just as well 2601:40C:8300:8A10:4D9A:3CCF:90B5:1332 (talk) 22:12, 6 September 2022 (UTC)