User talk:Andrevan/Archives/8

OFFICIAL THIRD MEETING NOTICE AND REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
The second AMA IRC Membership meetingwas held on Sunday January 30, 2005 at 19:00 UTC on freenode.net IRC channel #AMA. Attending were Wally, Metasquares, Anthere, Sam Spade, and alex756 (coordinator). The log of the second meeting can be found here: AMA IRC Meeting log (1-30-05).

"The third AMA Membership meeting will be held on Saturday February 12, 2005 at 17:00 UTC on freenode IRC channel #AMA. That is 12:00 Noon Eastern NA Time, 9 AM Pacific NA Time, and 6 PM Central European (Amsterdam/Stokholm/Warsaw/Venice) Time. All members are invited to attend.

Suggested Topics and Specific Proposals

 * MEMBERS PLEASE REVIEW


 * Suggestions for topics/proposals and agenda to be discussed at the next meeting are to be found at: AMA Meeting (suggested topics). All members are requested to make proposals there and respond to proposals on the talk page there before the beginning of the next meeting so discussion can be held forthwith concerning such proposals. Thank you, your Coordinator.

The coordinator is requesting that members who have not done so already submit the following information for the upcoming coordinator’s report:


 * How many individuals did you help as an advocate
 * What is the maximum amount of time you put into a case
 * Do you feel your work as an advocate was successful?
 * How can the advocacy program of the AMA be improved?

Thank you. Please submit your responses here. &#8212; &copy;   Alex756   23:19, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)

GCOTW
I'm giving you this message because you have been active on Gaming Collaboration of the week in the past. The collaboration had a bit of a hiatus, but it's now active again. A new article will be chosen this Sunday. It would be greatly appreciated if you visited the page to vote and/or make new nominations and worked on next week's GCOTW. Thanks. --Slowking Man 08:10, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)

Substub template
I created a new image for the Substub template (the Stub template has one, so I figured the Substub template could use one, too), but then I noticed it was locked. Would this image be acceptable for such use?

Fair use
The image Image:Alucard.jpg has today found its way to the Swedish Wikipedia (sv:Bild:Alucard.jpg) and caused a discussion about coyright law and fair use. I notice that you added the tag to the image a while ago. Do you still think that it is fair use to have the picture on Wikipedia? In my view, fair use allows Wikipedia using bookcovers, albumcovers, company logotypes and similary pictures, not drawings of this kind. Regards, Thuresson 16:47, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Mediation meeting
Template:Mediation-meeting Please edit the side box here (be brief) to update when you might be able to attend. Thanks. -==SV 22:05, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Re: Small wiki letter
Deleting it would be fine.

Mr. Do!
I re-read your shot at the page and I reconsidered. :) You're right, it does look better with the sequel information in the first paragraph. So I reverted it back to how you had it. I read that you are a video arcade enthusiast. Have you checked out the Arcade Wikiproject page? I know you are busy with being an admin and all but any contributions you can offer would be welcome. I seem to be the only one actively writing articles at the moment (I've done Sinistar, Ladybug and a few others), so more help would definitely be welcome. I have a feeling you have contributed yourself, but I'm just making sure. :) Anyway, my apologies for being hasty. I am still new at this (been on Wikipedia for about a month) and I haven't totally shaken It's-my-article-itis. I'm workin' on it. :) --Woohookitty 09:06, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

America Army help
Hello I noticed you had worked on AA. I was having a problem with a RememberMe / User:Nightbeast / User:BeOnGuard / 62.134.105.101 / [212.144.105.156] / Ele9699 19:03, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)

America Army help
Hello I noticed you had worked on AA. I was having a problem with a RememberMe / User:Nightbeast / User:BeOnGuard / 62.134.105.101 / [212.144.105.156] / Ele9699 19:04, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Meditation Committee
There's a backlog of requests currently at Meditation Committee that need some approval. Since you are a Meditator, your input would be nice. Peace, humblefool&reg; 02:41, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Thanks
A quick thanks for voting me to adminship. utcursch 08:28, Feb 23, 2005 (UTC)

Brothers In Arms
At some point during development Brothers In Arms was renamed to Brothers In Arms: Road to Hill 30, which is now the official name (for all versions). There's already a redirect at Brothers In Arms: Road to Hill 30, can you move Brothers In Arms there? I've made all the changes to the links to point to Road to Hill 30 already. Thanks. K1Bond007 19:31, Feb 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Thank you. K1Bond007 21:55, Feb 26, 2005 (UTC)

Thank You
I received your e-mail and I want to thank you for looking into the "blocked" incident. What happened was that an IP User was blocked by User: Curps and I became one of the unintended victums, but, that's O.K. it isn't the first time. What I did was, I restarted my computer and the problem was solved. Thanks again. User:Marine 69-71

Mr. Saturn
Hello there-- Recently I noticed your edits on the Mr. Saturn page and wanted to personally assure you there are no qualms regarding that articles' google hit count nor with you recent revert. My apologies if this has caused any confusion as that was not the intent. --GRider\talk 23:36, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Sixth era of gaming
I'm not really sure what happened here, but upon looking at the article 128-bit era, the talk page was somehow moved to Sixth era of gaming. (I missed it at first). I know there was a big discussion about the appropriate name for the article and while I don't feel 128-bit is correct, I do think the sixth era of gaming article should be merged back with the 128-bit discussion page until resolution can be made. Heh.. the article Sixth era which is a talk page really, has a discussion page too. It's really kind of messed up. Just thought I would alert you so something can be done about this if you're in agreement. K1Bond007 03:50, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)

Atheism
Andre, could you explain on the Talk page why you protected the article again, and what you expect to happen before it is unprotected again? I don't really think it was necessary. I actually don't have much objection to Adraeus' latest version, apart from a few copyedits to smooth out his text stylistically. Also, since you have been an editor of this article, and have participated also in the Talk page quite extensively, making your own views quite known, it might have been better to let some other admin protect it. For the past few months, Mgm has been the admin watching this article, and in my view has done a very good job in projecting neutrality, and I would suggest in the future that you ask him to protect it if it looks necessary to you. Regards, Brian --BM 20:49, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Adminship - User:ABCD
Thanks for supporting my request for adminship in January. I have recently reapplied, and you may wish to vote. Thanks, ABCD 19:06, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Thanks again for your support. – ABCD 16:01, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Once again, thanks – ABCD 02:42, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Thank you
Hi Andre, thank you so much for voting for me in my adminship nomination. I very much appreciate your support. Best, SlimVirgin 03:49, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)