User talk:Another Believer/Archive 35

Hobo's
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Hobo's has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Congratulations on taking it through GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:05, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , Thank you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 13:07, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of JR's Bar and Grill for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article JR's Bar and Grill is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/JR's Bar and Grill until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 08:46, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , Sigh, how many times do I have to ask you to actually do research before nominating an article I've created for deletion? Very frustrating... --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:25, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I think the consensus is going to be to delete this one, as based upon travel guides and trivial notices. I agree I could have made a stronger nomination if I had found more of the same sort.  DGG ( talk ) 05:47, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Good luck with that... --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 11:32, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Regarding We the People March
Hi--I nominated a page I created for deletion because the organizer, who is my abusive ex-partner, had me create it. It contains misleading information, some of which has already been corrected by other users, but people who were co-organizers of the We The People march, whom she did not want to credit on the page, have complained to me personally in recent weeks about not being given credit. They are not credited in any of the media surrounding the event because they got involved last minute and also because she wouldn't let anyone else speak to the media. I don't want to be bothered by people who are upset that she's taken credit for the entire event.

This is partly an issue about my own safety and privacy. I want the page I created deleted. If you or someone else wants to create an entirely new one, you're all free to do so. Tling2 (talk) 22:40, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Tling2
 * this section was moved from archives to the main talk page, as Tling2 posted it in the archives. &#9678; | melecie |   t  23:35, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , Actually, I created the entry, which you edited after. If you have specific concerns about the article's text, you can make them known here: Talk:We the People March. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 12:30, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dogwood Park


The article Dogwood Park has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Very small plot of land open to the public, but notability not asserted or established with substantive sources. City parks are not automatically notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 07:23, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2021). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Ashleyyoursmile • Less Unless
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Husond • MattWade • MJCdetroit • Carioca • Vague Rant • Kingboyk • Thunderboltz • Gwen Gale • AniMate • SlimVirgin (deceased)

Guideline and policy news
 * Consensus was reached to deprecate Editor assistance.
 * Following a Request for Comment the Book namespace was deprecated.

Technical news
 * Wikimedia previously used the IRC network Freenode. However, due to changes over who controlled the network with reports of a forceful takeover by several ex-staff members, the Wikimedia IRC Group Contacts decided to move to the new Libera Chat network. It has been reported that Wikimedia related channels on Freenode have been forcibly taken over if they pointed members to Libera. There is a migration guide and Wikimedia discussions about this.

Arbitration
 * After a Clarification request, the Arbitration Committee modified Remedy 5 of the Antisemitism in Poland case. This means sourcing expectations are a discretionary sanction instead of being present on all articles. It also details using the talk page or the Reliable Sources Noticeboard to discuss disputed sources.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:45, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: May 2021
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 14:08, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

"A Secret Love (TV series)" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect A Secret Love (TV series). The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 12 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Gonnym (talk) 14:58, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Editing news 2021 #2
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter



Earlier this year, the Editing team ran a large study of the Reply Tool. The main goal was to find out whether the Reply Tool helped newer editors communicate on wiki. The second goal was to see whether the comments that newer editors made using the tool needed to be reverted more frequently than comments newer editors made with the existing wikitext page editor.

The key results were:


 * Newer editors who had automatic ("default on") access to the Reply tool were more likely to post a comment on a talk page.
 * The comments that newer editors made with the Reply Tool were also less likely to be reverted than the comments that newer editors made with page editing.

These results give the Editing team confidence that the tool is helpful.

Looking ahead

The team is planning to make the Reply tool available to everyone as an opt-out preference in the coming months. This has already happened at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.

The next step is to resolve a technical challenge. Then, they will deploy the Reply tool first to the Wikipedias that participated in the study. After that, they will deploy it, in stages, to the other Wikipedias and all WMF-hosted wikis.

You can turn on "Discussion Tools" in Beta Features now. After you get the Reply tool, you can change your preferences at any time in Special:Preferences.

–Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

00:27, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Cricket Cafe
Hello: The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Cricket Cafe has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Congratulations on obtaining GA status for it. Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:37, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 13:38, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Tokyo 2019 39.jpg and File:Tokyo 2019 41.jpg
Are File:Tokyo 2019 39.jpg and File:Tokyo 2019 41.jpg valid for use on Commons? I'll defer to your judgement since you're significantly more active on Commons than I am, but my understanding of NFCC is that because the artwork in each image (by Gengoroh Tagame and Jiraiya, respectively) is presumably copyrighted, and because it's the main subject of the photograph, that makes the photo a derivative work. So even if you as the photographer disclaim all of your own rights over the photo, it's still protected by Tagame's and Jiraiya's copyrights. I was thrilled to finally have a lead image for Bara (genre), but I'm not certain its use is valid. Morgan695 (talk) 18:47, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , Thanks for pointing out. I had uploaded these as part of a mass transfer from my phone to Commons, and assumed these were just decorative wall art in the two establishments, but of course I'm open to deletion if necessary. Do you mind flagging on Commons if you think they are problematic? Sorry for the trouble! --- Another Believer  ( Talk ) 18:56, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * - Anyone can nominate Commons images for speedy, FYI. You can learn about that here. However, I'm probably just going to delete them (I am an admin) as copyright violations. Unless you can get permission from the artists? If you think you can, please let me know and I'll tag with a permission template. If not, I'll just delete as copy vios. Missvain (talk) 21:00, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , I'm not wanting to worry about permissions. Thanks for handling! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:21, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

GOCE June 2021 newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 12:37, 26 June 2021 (UTC).

The Signpost: 27 June 2021
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:14, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Have some caffine for your diligence!

 * Thanks for adding the image! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:16, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, of course :) Tyrone Madera (talk) 21:45, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Heat!
I keep seeing news articles about the extreme temperatures out by you. Hope you are staying safe! Armadillo pteryx  19:43, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , I am, thanks! I'm fortunate to have central A/C but many do not. I appreciate the note, --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:32, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Central AC is a rare thing around the PNW. I took my cats to stay at my mother-in-law's at the height of the heat wave, she's the only one I know with it. - Bri.public (talk) 17:52, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Just in case...
...you haven't seen this new cnet.com article on the growth of pedia's covid coverage, grabbed the link from Jimbo's talk page. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , Thanks! I see this has been added to Wikipedia coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic, too. Happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 12:44, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Trapezoid E for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trapezoid E is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Trapezoid E until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MB 01:16, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 July newsletter
The third round of the 2021 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 294 points, and our top six scorers all had over 600 points. They were:


 * 🇧🇼 The Rambling Man, with 1825 points from 3 featured articles, 44 featured article reviews, 14 good articles, 30 good article reviews and 10 DYKs. In addition, he completed a 34-article good topic on the EFL Championship play-offs.
 * Epicgenius, a New York specialist, with 1083 points from 2 featured article reviews, 18 good articles, 30 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
 * Bloom6132, with 869 points from 11 DYKs, all with bonus points, and 54 "In the news" items, mostly covering people who had recently died.
 * Standard of Oliver Cromwell (1653–1659).svg Gog the Mild, with 817 points from 3 featured articles on historic battles in Europe, 5 featured article reviews and 3 good articles.
 * Bennington Flag.svg Hog Farm, with 659 points from 2 featured articles and 2 good articles on American Civil War battles, 18 featured article reviews, 2 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 4 DYKs.
 * ICS Zulu.svg BennyOnTheLoose, a snooker specialist and new to the Cup, with 647 points from a featured article, 2 featured article reviews, 6 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 3 DYKs.

In round three, contestants achieved 19 featured articles, 7 featured lists, 106 featured article reviews, 72 good articles, 1 good topic, 62 good article reviews, 165 DYKs and 96 ITN items. We enter the fourth round with scores reset to zero; any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (one contestant in round 3 lost out because of this). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:29, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Byron Gomez
Hi there. It's not a question of me "feeling strongly", this is a case of WP:UPE. The choices would be to restore the redirect or draftify it, so it can go through AfC.  Onel 5969  TT me 21:23, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , Just reduce to a stub, then. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:35, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2021).

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Trialpears
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg AGK • Eliz81 • Mulad • ThaddeusB • Vianello • Who
 * Pictogram voting rename.png →

Interface administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Ragesoss



CheckUser changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg AGK • DGG

Oversighter changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg AGK

Guideline and policy news
 * Consensus has been reached to delete all books in the book namespace. There was rough consensus that the deleted books should still be available on request at WP:REFUND even after the namespace is removed.
 * An RfC is open to discuss the next steps following a trial which automatically applied pending changes to TFAs.

Technical news
 * IP addresses of unregistered users are to be hidden from everyone. There is a rough draft of how IP addresses may be shown to users who need to see them. This currently details allowing administrators, checkusers, stewards and those with a new usergroup to view the full IP address of unregistered users. Editors with at least 500 edits and an account over a year old will be able to see all but the end of the IP address in the proposal. The ability to see the IP addresses hidden behind the mask would be dependent on agreeing to not share the parts of the IP address they can see with those who do not have access to the same information. Accessing part of or the full IP address of a masked editor would also be logged. Comments on the draft are being welcomed at the talk page.

Arbitration
 * The community authorised COVID-19 general sanctions have been superseded by the COVID-19 discretionary sanctions following a motion at a case request. Alerts given and sanctions placed under the community authorised general sanctions are now considered alerts for and sanctions under the new discretionary sanctions.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

ArchiveSent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:26, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

My Father's Place (Portland, Oregon)
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article My Father's Place (Portland, Oregon) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Happy Fourth of July!

Twofingered Typist (talk) 18:44, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , Thank you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:34, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

"Men of the Cloth" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Men of the Cloth. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 7 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 04:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: June 2021
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 05:46, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Statue of Bee Gees moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Statue of Bee Gees, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ukhano (talk) 14:30, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Therapy (New York City)
— Maile (talk) 00:04, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

New public art listing in progress
FYI today I started User:Bri/Public art of the Washington State Ferries system. If you want to contribute, you are invited! I'll probably move it to draft space later in the day. - Bri.public (talk) 17:53, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , Oh, interesting! I've added the page to my watchlist so looking forward to following along. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:11, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Three Obliques (Walk In)
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Statue of Elizabeth II (Winnipeg) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Statue of Elizabeth II (Winnipeg) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Statue of Elizabeth II (Winnipeg) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Floydian  τ ¢ 16:17, 14 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Sigh... --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:58, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

"Solidarité" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Solidarité. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 16 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BOVINEBOY 2008 18:20, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Mural of Marcus Rashford for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mural of Marcus Rashford is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mural of Marcus Rashford until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 07:19, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Sigh --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:15, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

The Hill We Climb
Hi, Another Believer, thought that I'd update you-- "The Hill We Climb" is now a GA. Cheers, Eddie891 Talk Work 16:10, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , Wonderful! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:43, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

COVID-19 pandemic data
Hi. Will it still be possible to use Wikidata for several pages related to COVID-19, such as this template? Some editors used to suggest the idea of using Wikidata so that there will be less need to do updates manually. Fewer editors are still continuing to do so and doing updates have now become more challenging. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 18:09, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , I'm not familiar with how Wikidata could be used. You might pose this question at WikiProject COVID-19? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:13, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Discussions on the talk page seem to get little attention. A few days ago, I asked if there are other editors who might be able to edit the template, but help did not come. LSGH (talk) (contributions) 13:50, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , Yup, WikiProjects are often not very active, but that still may be among the best spaces to share your thoughts. Or maybe a community portal at Wikidata? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 13:51, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

AstroWorld
Hi and thanks for the help with Six Flags AstroWorld - I think I've squeezed enough out of my usual history sources and I'm done adding to the article, but welcome any feedback/edits and will work with other editor(s) to improve it. Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 15:52, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , Wonderful, thanks for letting me know! I'm a little bothered by the question marks in the rides/attractions table, but looks pretty good otherwise. I'll request a copy edit from the Guild of Copy Editors soon, and see if anyone at WikiProject Amusement parks wants to review. Do you have any interest in co-nominating for Good article status, or no? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:52, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Pupi Poisson for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pupi Poisson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pupi Poisson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dougal18 (talk) 16:01, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Sigh, has no one heard of redirecting or expressing concerns on an article's talk page before jumping to AfD? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:33, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

The Liquor Store
Hello: The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article The Liquor Store has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Congratulations on taking it to GA status. Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:58, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:20, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Duane Sorenson


The article Duane Sorenson has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not notable outside of a few local articles"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Broccoli &#38; Coffee  (Oh hai) 03:25, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Sigh --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 05:02, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Help with a draft article
Hi again! Are you down for helping me with a draft article I've been working on about a historic Oregon bridge? The link to the draft can be found at User:Tyrone Madera/sandbox/Hayden Bridge (Springfield, Oregon). Thanks a lot for your help with Oregon-related articles! Best, Tyrone Madera (talk) 18:04, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , I'll take a look, but I'm not very familiar with bridge article standards. I'd recommend moving the entry into main space and posting an invite for others to take a look at WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels. Thanks for helping to make Wikipedia better! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:07, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I just wanted to incorporate the sources from further reading and external links first, to get some heavy lifting out of the way. But, if you think that the main space is better, then fair enough. Thanks again for your help! Tyrone Madera (talk) 18:14, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , No prob, I say be bold when you're ready! :) --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:15, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

August Editathons at Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:23, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

"List of 2020 Summer Olympics medal winners" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect List of 2020 Summer Olympics medal winners. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 24 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Elli (talk &#124; contribs) 17:18, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 July 2021
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:10, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Drag Race National Categories
Before I create it, I thought I'd ask if there was a reason that you didn't create a Drag Race National category (like DR Holland) for "The Switch". Also wondering if the category should go under "T", "S" or "C" (for Chile) in the sorting for subcats in Drag Race Cat.Naraht (talk) 13:53, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , I'll create Category:The Switch Drag Race real quick, thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:43, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 45
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 45, May – June 2021 
 * Library design improvements continue
 * New partnerships
 * 1Lib1Ref update

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:04, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Oregon Department of Transportation mischief
Have you looked at the Oregon Department of Transportation wikipage? It's… interesting. Best, Tyrone Madera (talk) 04:27, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , Not familiar with the article and not on my watchlist. There's an editor there I do not wish to interact with but if there are content concerns I suggest sharing on the talk page or seeking help at WikiProject Oregon. Happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:33, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * No worries, I've already fixed the issue myself. I only brought it up because I found to be extremely funny. (Is the Department of Transportation out to get us all? Lol.) I hope you're having a fantastic day :). Cheers, Tyrone Madera (talk) 18:01, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2021).

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg BusterD
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Kees08 • Nickshanks • Protonk • Schissel • Ultraexactzz • Wknight94



CheckUser changes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg TheresNoTime

Oversighter changes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg TheresNoTime
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg ST47

Guideline and policy news
 * An RfC is open to add a delay of one week from nomination to deletion for G13 speedy deletions.

Technical news
 * Last week all wikis were very slow or not accessible for 30 minutes. This was due to server lag caused by regenerating dynamic lists on the Russian Wikinews after a large bulk import.

Arbitration
 * Following an amendment request, the committee has clarified that the Talk page exception to the 500/30 rule in remedy 5 of the Palestine-Israel articles 4 case does not apply to requested move discussions.

Miscellaneous
 * You can vote for candidates in the 2021 Board of Trustees elections from 4 August to 17 August. Four community elected seats are up for election.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:17, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Seedfeeder for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Seedfeeder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Seedfeeder& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 01:54, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

COVID cases in Nauru
Hello Another Believer, I am trying to have an opinion (from user who contribute to COVID articles) on this news: https://www.solomontimes.com/news/frontliners-test-negative-after-cargo-vessel-scare/10974. It seem that they have 13 positive cases on a ship in Nauru and I want to count them to this country. But, Nauru government still claim be covidfree ( https://www.facebook.com/groups/219485726427273/ ) and reliefweb speak of "International conveyance" ( https://reliefweb.int/map/world/epidemic-and-emerging-disease-alerts-pacific-27-july-2021 ). Have we to count these cases to Nauru? Regards, Sami270 (talk) 07:18, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * , I'm not sure, but you might want to focus on updating COVID-19_pandemic_in_Oceania, or posting talk page requests for feedback at Talk:COVID-19 pandemic in Oceania or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject COVID-19. I see you've already posted a message at Template talk:COVID-19 pandemic data, which was the other place I would have suggested. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 13:17, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi Another Believer, Thank you for your respond. It seem that the consensus is to not include these cases in Nauru total. Regards, Sami270 (talk) 07:18, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: July 2021
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 07:22, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Bridges Cafe
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Bridges Cafe has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:22, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * , Thank you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 13:25, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Template:RPDR
Hello. Due to your recent edits, which I personally find lacking in reasonable motivations, I invite you to partecipate in the discussion at Template:RuPaul's Drag Race. I'm very interested in seeing why you disagree, since you haven't specified the reasons of your revert anywhere. Thank you. --92.28.190.117 (talk) 15:49, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:04, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you, much appreciated! 92.28.190.117 (talk) 16:21, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Goodship logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Goodship logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GW Pharmaceuticals logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:GW Pharmaceuticals logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

York
Please let me know when you're done working on it as I don't edit if another editor is working on the same thing. When I'm working on it, please don't make changes until I'm done for the day. Thank you. deisenbe (talk) 20:00, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
 * , Sorry! By all means, please continue. I will revisit later. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:02, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Twisted Pleasures (American Horror Story)


A tag has been placed on Twisted Pleasures (American Horror Story) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"Episode title is unsourced and does not appear anywhere in the parent article."

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- / Alex /21  22:54, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Overdose (American Horror Story)


A tag has been placed on Overdose (American Horror Story) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"Episode title is unsourced and does not appear anywhere in the parent article."

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- / Alex /21  22:54, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dead and Buried (American Horror Story)


A tag has been placed on Dead and Buried (American Horror Story) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"Episode title is unsourced and does not appear anywhere in the parent article."

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- / Alex /21  22:54, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Please don't remove notability templates without an explanation
Please don't make edits like this without an explanation. Why did you think this was okay to do? "-" does not tell anybody why you think the article needs an article or how you think it is notable. How do you think it's notable? Because you are a fan of the Wainwrights?  Ss  112   17:09, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * , All you have to do is Google the name of the album to find multiple reviews. Simple! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:14, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * ...None of which you've actually taken the time to add, so how simple is it really?  Ss  112   17:20, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * , What's your point? Just add back the tag if you feel this is absolutely necessary. The album's clearly notable. (shrug) --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:22, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 August 2021
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:41, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mirth Provisions logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Mirth Provisions logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 September newsletter
The fourth round of the competition has finished with over 500 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants, 🇧🇼 The Rambling Man and Epicgenius, each scoring over 3000 points, and six contestants scoring over 1000. All but one of the finalists achieved one or more FAs during the round, the exception being Bloom6132 who demonstrated that 61 "in the news" items produces an impressive number of points. Other contestants who made it to the final are Gog the Mild, 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski,  BennyOnTheLoose, 🇷🇼 Amakuru and  Hog Farm. However, all their points are now swept away and everyone starts afresh in the final round.

Round 4 saw the achievement of 18 featured articles and 157 good articles. Bilorv scored for a 25-article good topic on Black Mirror but narrowly missed out on qualifying for the final round. There was enthusiasm for FARs, with 89 being performed, and there were 63 GARs and around 100 DYKs during the round. As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it to the final round; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For other contestants, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Formatted complete citations please
When you make bare citations like

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Todd_McGrain&diff=1041782395&oldid=1041782225

you give me work to clean up after you. I can't believe you're so busy you can't take the time to make a complete citation. deisenbe (talk) 16:55, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Feel free to not clean up after me. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:03, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2021).

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Jake Wartenberg
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Emperor • Viridian Bovary
 * Pictogram voting rename.png →

Guideline and policy news
 * Feedback is requested on the Universal Code of Conduct enforcement draft by the Universal Code of Conduct Phase 2 drafting committee.
 * A RfC is open on whether to allow administrators to use extended confirmed protection on high-risk templates.
 * A discussion is open to decide when, if ever, should discord logs be eligible for removal when posted onwiki (including whether to oversight them)
 * A RfC on the next steps after the trial of pending changes on TFAs has resulted in a 30 day trial of automatic semi protection for TFAs.

Technical news
 * The Score extension has been re-enabled on public wikis. It has been updated, but has been placed in safe mode to address unresolved security issues. Further information on the security issues can be found on the mediawiki page.

Arbitration
 * A request for comment is in progress to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the Arbitration Committee election and resolve any issues not covered by existing rules. Comments and new proposals are welcome.

Miscellaneous
 * The 2021 RfA review is now open for comments.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:44, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Use of autopatrolled perm
Hi Another Believer—I recently came across your autopatrolled article Statue of Edgar Martínez. In its present state, with only a single reference and no applicable SNG, the article does not meet notability standards, something I assume you know given your level of experience. The autopatrolled right is intended for editors who consistently create "clean" articles that do not require review by others. Please do not use it to create articles that do not demonstrate their notability, as that is an abuse of the permission. &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 03:20, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Sdkb. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Statue of Edgar Martínez, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 18:35, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Sure, whatever! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:16, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Reply-link officially superseded by DiscussionTools
Hi! Reply-link has officially been superseded by DiscussionTools, which you can install using the "Discussion tools" checkbox under. DiscussionTools, developed by the WMF's Editing Team, is faster and has more features than reply-link, and it wouldn't make sense for me to keep developing reply-link. I think the Editing Team is doing amazing work, and look forward to what they can do in the future. Thank you for using reply-link over the years! Enterprisey (talk!) 06:11, 6 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the heads up! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 12:14, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Statue of Ken Griffey Jr. for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Statue of Ken Griffey Jr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Statue of Ken Griffey Jr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Sounder Bruce  22:38, 7 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Yo!, just ping me next time. AfD's a waste of time when these can just be redirected. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:44, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I was trying to go through this the right way. Got scolded for redirecting too hastily last time.  Sounder Bruce  22:54, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
 * No need to apologize! Just an invite for next time, since I generally respond to article (and user) talk page comments. I've written quite a few Good articles about statues, but I'm not inclined to scramble to flesh all 3 of these out immediately. Happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 22:58, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your keep vote. Personally, I think there's some potential here, but I've learned dropping what I'm doing to save multiple projects about artworks at once is too stressful. Hopefully I can revisit and expand the stubs soon. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:08, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of August 2021 North America heat wave


The article August 2021 North America heat wave has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable event, no records broken, limited independent coverage"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Running On Brains (talk) 04:59, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

/
Not that it really makes any difference, but is there a reason you feel "Australia / New Zealand" is better than "Australia & New Zealand"? --Pokelova (talk) 14:48, 10 September 2021 (UTC)


 * I don't feel too strongly. I guess this is similar to the discussion editors had re: which symbol to use for "Monét X Change + Trinity Taylor". "+" vs "/" vs "&"... --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:51, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Also, I noticed Drag Race (franchise) has no symbol at all. (shrug) --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:53, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: August 2021
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 00:29, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

OneClickArchiver
FYI, OneClickArchiver does not work properly on pages not set up to use lowercase sigmabot III. It moves everything to /Archive 1, regardless of whether it is the most recent archive page. --Paul_012 (talk) 04:28, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Samuel Jacobs
Hi User:Another Believer how are you, can you take a look at this article Draft:Samuel Jacobs If it's encyclopedic, can you move the draft, to the article's main space? what is your opinion Thank you --Hasan AB123 (talk) 14:00, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

"Tell Me Everything (film)" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tell Me Everything (film). The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 18 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. – DarkGlow • 12:31, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 46
<div style = "color: #936c29; font-size: 4em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif"> The Wikipedia Library <span style="font-size: 2em; font-family: Copperplate, 'Copperplate Gothic Light', serif">Books & Bytes

Issue 46, July – August 2021 <div style = "margin-top: 1.5em; border: 3px solid #ae8c55; border-radius: .5em; padding: 1em 1.5em; font-size: 1.2em">
 * Library design improvements deployed
 * New collections available in English and German
 * Wikimania presentation

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:14, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Prism Health logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Prism Health logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:51, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fiona Apple, Paper Bag.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Fiona Apple, Paper Bag.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:21, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Gentrification of Portland, Oregon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gentrification of Portland, Oregon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gentrification of Portland, Oregon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. User:力 (power~enwiki, π,  ν ) 04:34, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Yay, another AfD nomination without an assessment of secondary coverage... Another Believer  ( Talk ) 04:43, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Tlalli
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Query
Hello, Another Believer,

I stumbled upon List of Wikipedia people and reviewing the people listed, I could see a connection between each individual to the English Wikipedia or the WMF except in the case of Andrea James. Since people aren't included on this list just for writing about or critiquing Wikipedia, the only reason I could guess that she was included was that she was an active contributor here. There are plenty of people who write about Wikipedia but they are not included on this list. Her own article doesn't talk about her participation on Wikipedia, just saying she wrote about the project. I noticed you had edited both articles so, without giving any personal identification, could you confirm she is notable in regards to working for or at Wikipedia/WMF? That seems to be the standard for inclusion on this list. Thanks for any help you can offer. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 00:37, 26 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Based on the current article's prose, I would say she should not be included in the list; additionally, List of Wikipedia people should be removed from the See also section and Category:Wikipedia people should not be applied. Would you like to make these changes, or shall I? Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:11, 26 September 2021 (UTC)  Sorry!, I spoke too soon and I've changed my mind entirely. I read the prose too quickly and thought she wrote about Wikipedia. However, I now see she has contributed to Wikipedia. To me, this qualifies her for list inclusion (and the see also link and category apply). Sorry for the confusion! --- Another Believer  ( Talk ) 01:20, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, the only reference I could find was in one interview from years ago, she stated that she was in the Top 40 editors for creating articles but she added that she didn't edit any more. This really isn't confirmation to me, it's just a claim. And this list states it is "Wikipedia people" so, to me, that implies some formal relationship with the organization, it's not just editors who have an article written about them. But if you know her username and believe her to once have been a very active editor, then I trust your judgment about this. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 02:05, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
 * @If you think the article should be updated to remove the claim because of insufficient sourcing, I don't have a problem. Anyone can say they've edited Wikipedia in an interview. In my opinion, if the article's prose says someone contributes to Wikipedia, then list inclusion is appropriate, but if the claim is not appropriate for Wikipedia, then her article should be updated and her name should be removed from the list. I do not know her username, nor am I particularly interested in digging for more info. I am not opposed to putting the onus on editors to more clearly indicate her connection to Wikipedia using secondary coverage (not an interview). --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 02:11, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
 * See User:Jokestress. This did not take any digging or outing. It was the first hit when I searched for "Andrea James" in User space. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:51, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
 * @Jonesey95 Thanks! FYI! --- Another Believer  ( Talk ) 14:54, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Here's a link confirming top 40 in mainspace pages created (about 90% redirects), as of 2016. The count was about the same in 2013, when the editor stopped editing frequently, at which point they were at 150 in actual articles created. FWIW. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:59, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks again. I am comfortable leaving her at List of Wikipedia people but I think her article should be updated to use secondary coverage instead of an interview re: her connection to the project. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:00, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 September 2021
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:52, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Your New Album Covers Project
Kudos on starting the new project on missing album covers, and I'm sorry I missed the original discussion last week at the Albums Project talk page. I have some impressions to share about this effort; please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Backlog elimination drive: Album covers. Thanks! --- <b style="color:#66CDAA"> DOOMSDAYER 520</b> (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 01:21, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Masia (restaurant)
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Masia (restaurant) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Congratulations on reaching GA status.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:04, 28 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:15, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Another Believer

Thank you for creating Access All Areas (EP).

User:Boleyn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Boleyn (talk) 15:19, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm MB. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Philip Linn Pioneer Cemetery, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

<b style="color:#034503">MB</b> 21:52, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm MB. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Statue of Juan José Arreola, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

<b style="color:#034503">MB</b> 21:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm MB. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Statue of Pedro Moreno, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

<b style="color:#034503">MB</b> 21:53, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:24 Hour Psychedelic Freakout.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:24 Hour Psychedelic Freakout.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:100% No Modern Talking - Knife Party.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:100% No Modern Talking - Knife Party.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:100% No Modern Talking - Knife Party.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:100% No Modern Talking - Knife Party.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Mothers of Gynecology Monument
I saw this on Facebook--if I can I'll drive by tomorrow morning and take some pictures, with my phone, so it might not be high quality. Thanks for writing it up. Drmies (talk) 02:38, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
 * @Drmies Wonderful, thank you! Keep in mind, you can only upload one image under fair use. Much appreciated! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 02:39, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Hey, I don't follow: you mean there's a rule, only one picture for a work of art? Interesting. BTW you know there's a statue of Sims on the front lawn of the state capitol, right? It's been a bone of contention for a few years now. Drmies (talk) 02:42, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
 * @Drmies Yes, since contemporary artworks are most often copyrighted, usually only one image can be uploaded for the entry's infobox. After you click on "upload file", click on "This is a copyrighted, non-free work, but I believe it is Fair Use.", then " This is a depiction of a copyrighted three-dimensional work or building", then select "Other 3-dimensional creative work (sculpture etc)". Then, you can add other details such as artist and date, name of photographer and date, etc. I hope this helps! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 02:46, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks--I'll keep that in mind. I might could take one of Sims too, though I've tried that before--the problem is his statue is partly in the shade, on an awkwardly hilly part, and obscured from various angles. Meh, I'm not sure he deserves another picture anyway. Drmies (talk) 02:48, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
 * By the way, your user page says "Portland"--yet everywhere on social media I read that BLM and Antifa burned down the ENTIRE city of Portland, and also every other important city in the country. Atlanta is still burning, apparently. Strange. Drmies (talk) 02:50, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
 * @Drmies Maybe don't believe everything you read on social media...! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 02:53, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021 Guild of Copy Editors newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:43, 30 September 2021 (UTC)