User talk:Ealdgyth/Archive 77

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:45, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2019). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg 28bytes • Ad Orientem • Ansh666 • Beeblebrox • Boing! said Zebedee • BU Rob13 • Dennis Brown • Deor • DoRD • 1 • Flyguy649 • 2 • Gadfium • GB fan • Jonathunder • Kusma • Lectonar • Moink • MSGJ • Nick • Od Mishehu • Rama • Spartaz • Syrthiss • TheDJ • WJBscribe
 * 1 's access was removed, then restored, then removed again.
 * 2 's access was removed, then restored, then removed again.

Bureaucrat changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg 28bytes • WJBscribe • Wizardman

Interface administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg MSGJ • TheDJ

CheckUser changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Beeblebrox • BU Rob13 • DoRD

Oversight changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Beeblebrox • BU Rob13 • DoRD • GB fan

Guideline and policy news
 * A request for comment seeking to alleviate pressures on the request an account (ACC) process proposes either raising the account creation limit for extended confirmed editors or granting the account creator permission on request to new ACC tool users.
 * In a related matter, the account throttle has been restored to six creations per day as the mitigation activity completed.
 * The scope of CSD criterion G8 has been tightened such that the only redirects that it now applies to are those which target non-existent pages.
 * The scope of CSD criterion G14 has been expanded slightly to include orphan "Foo (disambiguation)" redirects that target pages that are not disambiguation pages or pages that perform a disambiguation-like function (such as set index articles or lists).
 * A request for comment seeks to determine whether Office actions should be a policy page or an information page.

Technical news
 * The Wikimedia Foundation's Community health initiative plans to design and build a new user reporting system to make it easier for people experiencing harassment and other forms of abuse to provide accurate information to the appropriate channel for action to be taken. Community feedback is invited.

Miscellaneous
 * In February 2019, the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) changed its office actions policy to include temporary and project-specific bans. The WMF exercised this new ability for the first time on the English Wikipedia on 10 June 2019 to temporarily ban and desysop . This action has resulted in significant community discussion, a request for arbitration (permalink), and, either directly or indirectly, the resignations of numerous administrators and functionaries. The WMF Board of Trustees is aware of the situation, and discussions continue on a statement and a way forward. The Arbitration Committee has sent an open letter to the WMF Board.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:19, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 July newsletter
The third round of the 2019 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it to the fourth round needed to score at least 68 points, which is substantially lower than last year's 227 points. Our top scorers in round 3 were:


 * 🇳🇫 Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with 500 points derived mainly from a featured article and two GAs on natural history topics
 * Adam Cuerden, with 480 points, a tally built on 16 featured pictures, the result of meticulous restoration work
 * SounderBruce, a finalist in the last two years, with 306 points from a variety of submissions, mostly related to sport or the State of Washington
 * 🇺🇸 Usernameunique, with 305 points derived from a featured article and two GAs on archaeology and related topics

Contestants managed 4 (5) featured articles, 4 featured lists, 18 featured pictures, 29 good articles, 50 DYK entries, 9 ITN entries, and 39 good article reviews. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them, and it is imperative to claim them in the correct round; one FA claim had to be rejected because it was incorrectly submitted (claimed in Round 3 when it qualified for Round 2), so be warned! When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Lead (lede)
Hi, Ealdgyth - I'm aware the lede of an article should be a summary that stands on its own, but is there a MOS I'm missing that states whatever is stated/cited in the lede has to be in the body text? I realize that everything in the body doesn't have to be in the lede, but where does it specifically state that everything stated/cited in the lede must be in the body? Atsme Talk 📧 00:25, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
 * WP:LEDE - "Apart from basic facts, significant information should not appear in the lead if it is not covered in the remainder of the article." ... generally that means something like co-ordinates for a town or pronunciation of the name. Ealdgyth - Talk 01:01, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:38, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks
Just wanted to say that I appreciate your work reverting vandalism on the Heathenry page. Keep up the good work. Stormkith (talk) 00:06, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Ahnentafels
Please be invited to comment on: Template_talk:Ahnentafel. PPEMES (talk) 17:32, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:39, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2019).

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Johnuniq • Kosack • Valereee
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Ad Orientem • Ched • Gadfium • Jonathunder • Nick • Yelyos
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Bald Zebra • Beetstra • Doug Bell • Journalist • Ruud Koot • Splash • Voice of Clam

Interface administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Dinoguy1000

CheckUser changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg RickinBaltimore

Oversight changes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Beeblebrox
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg RickinBaltimore

Guideline and policy news
 * Following a request for comment, the page Office actions has been changed from a policy page to an information page.
 * A request for comment (permalink) is in progress regarding the administrator inactivity policy.

Arbitration
 * Editors may now use the template Ds/aware to indicate that they are aware that discretionary sanctions are in force for a topic area, so it is unnecessary to alert them.

Miscellaneous
 * Following a research project on masking IP addresses, the Foundation is starting a new project to improve the privacy of IP editors. The result of this project may significantly change administrative and counter-vandalism workflows. The project is in the very early stages of discussions and there is no concrete plan yet. Admins and the broader community are encouraged to leave feedback on the talk page.
 * The new page reviewer right is bundled with the admin tool set. Many admins regularly help out at Special:NewPagesFeed, but they may not be aware of improvements, changes, and new tools for the Curation system. Stay up to date by subscribing  here to the NPP newsletter that appears every two months, and/or putting the reviewers' talk page on your watchlist. Since the introduction of temporary user rights, it is becoming more usual to accord the New Page Reviewer right on a probationary period of 3 to 6 months in the first instance. This avoids rights removal for inactivity at a later stage and enables a review of their work before according the right on a permanent basis.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

To answer your question...
This is the relevant bot approval, citing this discussion. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:34, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:27, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

WikiCup 2019 September newsletter
The fourth round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 454 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with over 400 points being eliminated, and all but two of the finalists having achieved an FA during the round. Casliber, our 2016 winner, was the highest point-scorer, followed by Enwebb and Lee Vilenski, who are both new to the competition. In fourth place was SounderBruce, a finalist last year. But all those points are swept away as we start afresh for the final round.

Round 4 saw the achievement of 11 featured articles. In addition, Adam Cuerden scored with 18 FPs, Lee Vilenski led the GA score with 8 GAs while Kosack performed 15 GA reviews. There were around 40 DYKs, 40 GARs and 31 GAs overall during round 4. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.

As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:40, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2019). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Bradv • Chetsford • Izno
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Floquenbeam • Lectonar
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg DESiegel • Jake Wartenberg • Rjanag • Topbanana

CheckUser changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Callanecc • LFaraone • There'sNoTime

Oversight changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Callanecc • Fox • HJ Mitchell • LFaraone • There'sNoTime

Technical news
 * Editors using the mobile website on Wikipedia can opt-in to new advanced features via your settings page. This will give access to more interface links, special pages, and tools.
 * The advanced version of the edit review pages (recent changes, watchlist, and related changes) now includes two new filters. These filters are for "All contents" and "All discussions". They will filter the view to just those namespaces.

Arbitration
 * A request for comment is open to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the 2019 English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee election and to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.

Miscellaneous
 * A global request for comment is in progress regarding whether a user group should be created that could modify edit filters across all public Wikimedia wikis.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

William de Corbeil scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the William de Corbeil article has been scheduled as today's featured article for October 12, 2019. I know there's a potential date link for his enthronement, but I want to run this to replace another medieval cleric which turned out to have been scheduled before. Let me know asap if you would rather have this on the linked date so I can find an alternative.

Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/October 12, 2019, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

For Featured Articles promoted on or after October 1, 2018, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.

We suggest that you watchlist Main Page/Errors up to the day of this TFA. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:53, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Not a problem, Jim. I don't get too fussed about enthronement dates - they were important in the middle ages, but not so much now. Ealdgyth - Talk 12:38, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Housecleaning
I wrote myself a note a long time ago about articles that I was surprised hadn't run at TFA yet ... two are Kurt Vonnegut (birthday Nov. 11) and Warren G. Harding (birthday Nov. 2). I don't have a preference on when they run ... this is more like housecleaning. Wehwalt nommed one and co-nommed the other, so I've asked on his talkpage if November would be a good time to run them. It's your call of course, since it's November. - Dank (push to talk) 16:55, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * There's an interesting discussion at User talk:Wehwalt. - Dank (push to talk) 18:11, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Reformation
Thank you for your interest in making edits on the Reformation page but accept that you cannot refer to the Protestant Reformation as "European" and your acceptance of this is required to prevent an edit war. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.3.208.254 (talk) 23:54, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

The edit war is over and the Reformation is not "European". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.3.208.254 (talk) 00:29, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

InternetArchiveBot
I see you've been repeatedly deleting this bot's links to the Internet Archive, with the summary "no sense linking to previews that aren't complete". I entirely agree with you, and have done a few myself. These links seem calculated to waste the reader's time by sending them to consult pages that neither confirm the claims made, nor provide additional information of any value. Given that the bot is funded by the Internet Archive, they seem to my mind to amount to nothing more than spam. Do you know if this has been raised anywhere; or, if not, have any suggestions as to the best place to do so? GrindtXX (talk) 12:18, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Nikkimaria posted above User talk:Ealdgyth with a pointer. Ealdgyth - Talk 12:39, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks ... that's disappointing. GrindtXX (talk) 12:56, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I started this discussion, in which I queried bot approval, but it seems to have been disregarded. Nortonius (talk) 13:11, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Like you, I had not appreciated that it was possible (by jumping through a lot of hoops) to access the full text through these links. But now, as of today (as far as I can see), the bot has started adding links with a "registration required" notice added (e.g. here). I'm still not wholly convinced of their usefulness or neutrality, but this is a massive step in the right direction. GrindtXX (talk) 16:25, 5 September 2019 (UTC)


 * To be honest, until those previews are available as cited in an article, i.e. over as many pages as are cited, I'm dead against them. I posted where I did because that's what it says to do on on the bot's talk page, but really I think the issue needs to be taken to a broader venue. For personal reasons, I'm disinclined to do that myself. But, as I said in the linked discussion, "as far as I can see, the inability to view more than two pages in a single preview was not raised as a substantive issue in the discussion of the original proposal": IOW, I believe approval of this bot activity was deeply flawed, and that it needs to be re-addressed. For another example, a key statement made in support of the activity in the approval discussion – "any book being linked straight to a page number is immediately visible to the reader clicking it" – is patently not true. As you've seen, the concerns I raised seem to have been ignored: certainly the bot is still posting those previews, and I and others are still reverting it. Nortonius (talk) 12:53, 9 September 2019 (UTC)


 * There are so many that I have given up on mass reverting and only revert on FAs. In some cases I have had to revert twice on the same article. Dudley Miles (talk) 14:11, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Use to prevent the bot returning. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:21, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks, good plan. Nortonius (talk) 14:28, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
 * And thanks from me. Dudley Miles (talk) 19:20, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm getting a lot of these too in my area. Something no one has mentioned that I see on this preview is that you can "borrow" the whole book for 14 days. I wonder if that is what is supposed to make the preview useful in the IA's eyes? Anyone else notice this? Is that where registered above is being referred to? However, I do agree that the preview is pretty useless. You can't see even one page after the contents. dawnleelynn(talk) 21:33, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

About borrowing content, see the discussion I linked above, which for your convenience I link again here. I commented there on the idea of borrowing in the context of citations, but no-one responded so it wasn't developed. I've no idea of the scale of IABot's edits of this type, but I'd guess it's large. I wonder if archive.org isn't using WP to piggy-back its way to being the largest such resource on the web. I appreciate archive.org immensely, but in the meantime these edits are being steamrollered through WP with little or no regard for their usefulness or for how editors edit, e.g. WP:CITEVAR. As things stand the whole deal strikes me as a techie fantasy, dreamed up in isolation from those who actually edit. Nortonius (talk) 11:14, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for providing the link again, my bad, I read all of it. I do not see the point of borrowing a book if you can't use it in citations. Even if you could use it in a citation, it would not be available except while it is borrowed, right? I see all concerns posted there & here are legitimate ones. I now feel it necessary to revert the edits in the articles I watchlist. I'm not sure if I will disable the bot on articles though. Anyway, thanks for the information, much appreciated. dawnleelynn(talk) 20:55, 13 September 2019 (UTC)