User talk:Hurricane Noah/Archive 4

Season's Greetings!
Happy Holidays text.png Hello, Hurricane Noah! Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! May you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. May 2021 be an even better year for you! Stay safe and healthy.  Light and Dark2000  🌀 (talk) 23:54, 22 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Happy Holidays!
Happy Holidays text.png Hello Hurricane Noah: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, ~ Destroyer 🌀🌀 01:54, 23 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message ~  Destroyer 🌀🌀 01:54, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!
Happy Holidays text.png Hello Hurricane Noah: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, 𝙲𝚘𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐𝙲𝚢𝚌𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚎 ᴛᴀʟᴋ 01:42, 24 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message 𝙲𝚘𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐𝙲𝚢𝚌𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚎 ᴛᴀʟᴋ 01:42, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Re: Olivia
IDK if you're going to find enough to bring Olivia to FAC. If that's still your plan, then I'd split off the preps into its own section, and then have the impact section go island by island (starting with the overall damage).


 * Bit more impacts - flooded homes and highway
 * Offices/parks closed, 15,800 people without power
 * Dozen homes flooded
 * Flight canceled
 * Downed trees, a roof blown off, closed road, etc.

I hope these few sources help a bit! Sorry it took a while to get back. I've been busy with end of the semester stuff, plus getting ready for Festivus/Xmas. I should be editing a lot more come next week. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 16:25, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I discovered that virtually no impact occurred on the Big Island and anything north of Oahu. Oahu wasn't even that badly affected other than a dam filling up decently high. Appears most of the impact was isolated to Maui County. I did find some more, but I think this is everything there is. idk how that would pan out for a FAC. Noah Talk 22:07, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Hmm, that's a good number of sources. Don't try stretching it out for the sake of having more words, but there could be enough still for FAC. I know how badly you'd like an all featured topic (which would be mighty impressive!) ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 14:03, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I may be able to get a 3,000-word article. The rewrite is at 1100 words rn with about 20-30 more sources to go and no met. Noah Talk 17:37, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year!




 Hurricane Noah , Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! ~ Destroyer 🌀🌀 21:41, 31 December 2020 (UTC)


 * – Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

Typhoon Alice and Effects of Hurricane Dorian in the Carolinas GA
Hurricane Noah, I'm here to report that tasks for Typhoon Alice (1953) has been complete and I would like to ask for your opinion about It looks better, but I'm not sure if you still want like one or two more paragraphs for it. by Cyclone Toby in Effects of Hurricane Dorian in the Carolinas GA.  Mario Jump  83!  12:23, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Cyclone Zorbas
Do you think this article is a part of 2018 Global FT?  Mario Jump  83!  13:44, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Help
Hi Noah, I hope you are doing well. I am wondering where to retrieve the advisory/discussion archive for Hurricane Kilo. It's the first time I'm doing a Cpac storm. ~ Destroyeraa 🌀🇺🇸 00:21, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
 * On NHC's website under CPAC tabs for advisories and TCRs. Btw, I am not going to have time to do anything on WP until May since I will have 120+ assignments per week for a single course. Noah Talk 01:37, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

FAR tropical cyclone
I have nominated Tropical cyclone for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Femke Nijsse (talk) 16:09, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Meteorological history of Hurricane Dorian scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that Meteorological history of Hurricane Dorian has been scheduled as WP:TFA for 18 February 2021. Please check that the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/February 18, 2021. Thanks! Ealdgyth (talk) 14:47, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you today for the article "about the powerful storm that stalled over the Bahamas at peak intensity and made at least eight total landfalls"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:56, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Invite!
Hurricane  Covid  (contribs) 18:56, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hurricane Olivia (2018), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manzanillo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Potential Tropical Cyclone Seventeen-E, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puerto Escondido.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Potential Tropical Cyclone Seventeen-E
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Potential Tropical Cyclone Seventeen-E you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Editoneer -- Editoneer (talk) 08:41, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Potential Tropical Cyclone Seventeen-E
The article Potential Tropical Cyclone Seventeen-E you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Potential Tropical Cyclone Seventeen-E for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Editoneer -- Editoneer (talk) 17:41, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Potential Tropical Cyclone Seventeen-E
The article Potential Tropical Cyclone Seventeen-E you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Potential Tropical Cyclone Seventeen-E for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Editoneer -- Editoneer (talk) 23:01, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

A new draft you might be interested in
Hey. I started Draft:Tornado outbreak of March 25, 2021 and thought you might be interested in it. Elijahandskip (talk) 16:12, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of the 2018 Pacific hurricane season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puerto Escondido.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

About the 2018 EPAC timeline
I'm ready to work on it. Is there anything you need me to do at this point? CodingCyclone! 🌀 📘 20:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Top-importance Flood articles


A tag has been placed on Category:Top-importance Flood articles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:51, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Unknown-importance Flood articles


A tag has been placed on Category:Unknown-importance Flood articles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:51, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:NA-importance Flood articles


A tag has been placed on Category:NA-importance Flood articles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:52, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:High-importance Flood articles


A tag has been placed on Category:High-importance Flood articles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:52, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Low-importance Flood articles


A tag has been placed on Category:Low-importance Flood articles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:52, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Mid-importance Flood articles


A tag has been placed on Category:Mid-importance Flood articles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:54, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Re: TC
Yea, sorry I've been MIA. I got into a bad headspace from work, and I was dealing with some relationship stuff. Today I had the strong desire to edit. But lately, IDK, I've felt an overwhelming sense of the enormity of what we're trying to do. For starters, we have so many articles that need to be updated, because they were written so long ago. A lot of our old FA's probably wouldn't pass today, but some for less problems than others (sourcing vs. comprehensiveness, most stuff is at least well-written and somewhat well-documented).

Re: TC, I think there could be one large section for Climatology and Records. The way I imagined it, it has some history of very old tropical cyclones, the start of the databases, records for storms (such as strongest/costliest/deadliest storms). That would eliminate the need for notable tropical cyclones, which is somewhat thorough, but it doesn't have a proper global perspective. Jason and I discussed, and perhaps the best way to approach the TC article is to structure it based on the sub-articles that we already have: tropical cyclones by area, naming, storms by year (which I agree needs to be split up more), whatnot. Perhaps there should be a technical article on Tropical cyclone structure? That will help focus the main article. Maybe merge/expand Central dense overcast into it. I'm not sure.

Doing this will help focus the other areas, such as tropical cyclones by area, which would then funnel into every country/territory list. Then TC naming will funnel all of the naming articles. TC's by year is already partially developed. This could be linked in the "Climatology and records" section. Also, I moved a sentence from Background to there, and so I think we can get rid of the "Background section". We also might be able to get rid of the Atlantic-biased "Notable tropical cyclones", and just put 1970 Bhola, Tip, and Katrina/Harvey in there. Other storms could get a mention if we do a section for "Effects by region", with the main article being Draft:Tropical cyclone effects by region. Just some (long overdue) thoughts. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 19:57, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
 * As you can see from my plan for the intensity subsection, it is quite a large topic with many subtopics of its own. The same factors that influence intensification also influence formation. Likewise with weakening and dissipation. It just makes since to discuss all of that related content in one place. I plan to rework the preparations eventually and expand it a great deal. Noah Talk 20:40, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I agree, all of the elements of met history are related. Structure, intensity, dissipation, formation. I'm not sure the best name for such a section. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 22:43, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
 * All I can say is that I am going to have to add in a lot of content for intensity. There's so many important details on the topic that are missing. It will take me quite some time to get intensity completely up to par. We are probably looking at an additional 20–30k byte expansion from intensity-related content. The methods section was a long-needed addition of content. Factors for intensity are also a key part that is being worked out currently. RI will have to be scrapped and rewritten with new sources as the RI SST threshold mentioned is way too high; I have sources putting the MEAN at 28.5C. I need to condense the dissipation section as well. Not to mention all the restructuring that will eventually occur. I can handle this intensity section, but it will take a while to fill it all out. Noah Talk 23:04, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I decided to put the 2018 PHS timeline up for FLC since my classes are done now. It's the final obstacle... Let's hope it can be surmounted. Noah Talk 22:58, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

WP:Weather
Hey, how's that all going? Sorry I haven't been too active on here. I'm focusing on RL stuff and mental health, but I should have time for some editing. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 17:00, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I have merged over a decent bit of WP Met but I have to manually sort hundreds of articles. Also, I put Olivia up. I don’t know if you saw how much it changed since the GA review 2 years ago, but it is a lot more full now. Noah Talk 17:04, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Nice! I made a few project pages that'll eventually be expanded, that is, articles By location, By year, and By weather type. Jason made the location one, and it might have to be updated, but it gives a good overview for what articles are needed. I also reviewed Olivia - good work on it. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 17:33, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I merged in WPNTS last night and am waiting for AWB so I can perform talkpage template cleanup. Once that is done, I can do severe weather. I can't edit the WPTC template since it requires template editor. I need to wait for the CCI to clear up anyways. In regards to your one comment on Olivia, even as a more conservative-leaning individual, I can say the "successful" businessman left quite a bad aftertaste. Noah Talk 17:39, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

About the WikiProject merger
I just wanted to know which ones are being pulled in. Would WikiProject Volcanoes get merged in? What about Earthquakes, or Wildfires? Thanks. Also, is there anything I can do to help? (Note that I don't have AWB.) CodingCyclone!  🌀 📘 19:58, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Just jumping in - the project is about different weather events. I don’t think we should include other natural disasters like earthquakes or volcanos, which are more geology than meteorology. However, wildfires should be, since they typically occur due to lightning and/or periods of drought. You don’t often hear of large wildfires in the tropics in times of plentiful rain. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 20:21, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
 * And, to add onto what HH said above, wildfires also can produce their own weather-related events, like Pyrocumulus and Pyrocumulonimbus, strong winds and even Firenados and they have a large effect on atmospheric conditions, in regards to aerosols, and climatic impacts. Not to mention, wildfires have many environmental impacts, and can change how the weather or climate  is for certain locations.  As for volcanoes, one could argue that it should get merged as their eruptions (especially the major ones) have a profound effect on atmospheric and weather-related conditions, such as ashfall, and global cooling (very rarely) though like HH said they are mainly geological events. Maybe on articles regarding major volcanic eruptions, we could add one of the WP banner assessment classes, so that we could get some editors with weather experience to update and add more factual information. For example, a great article that is related to a volcanic eruption is the 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo. Not only did this have many impacts on environmental and atmospheric conditions (It is theorized that it may have even played a part in the 1993 Storm of the Century, per the article itself) but as the major eruption occurred, damages were increased/worsened from Typhoon Yunya (1991), which happened to be nearby, causing rain-laden ash to fall. That is a good example of how some more geological phenomena could still be part of the Weather Wikiproject.  🌀CycloneFootball71🏈 |sandbox  05:22, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi It is great to wake up and see your comments about the weather project, as they make me excited for the future. I wasn't aware that there was a separate wikiproject for Wildfires, which we should probably consult with about merging into the weather project. However, my feeling is that we would be going to far if we added WP:Mountains, WP:Volcanoes or WP:Earthquakes as while they all have significant effects on the weather they are mainly geological events. That doesn't mean that we couldn't cover the effects of mountains or volcanoes on the weather or add Tsunamis to overall flood articles. What we really could do with is your local knowledge about the weather in your area/country and help researching topics like Floods in Fiji, Vanuatu etc or Tornadoes in New Zealand.Jason Rees (talk) 15:34, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I too am excited for the future of the project and where it is headed. As for Geology, you and HH are definitely right that those are all geologically related, despite locally affecting the weather. As for researching local weather topics, I will definitely do that, I am planning on finishing/writing an article over time in the realm of tropical/extratropical cyclone effects in the Pacific northwest, in which I currently am located at. However, I might make Hurricanes in Washington as that is direct to my state, and that would probably be easier for me, plus it was on articles by location.🌀CycloneFootball71🏈 |sandbox  18:04, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you all for your input! I could consult with the Wildfires WikiProject later today. I don't want to reveal my location so I'll see about researching to help make some of those redlinks blue. :) CodingCyclone!  🌀 📘 18:08, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hurricane Leslie (2018), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tarn.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:07, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

User talk:Hurricane Noah/Hurricane Leslie (2018)/Sources
You might find some sources here. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:50, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks. This should be one massive article once it is finished. There are 90 sources in it right now and I have 85 more links to look at (almost all Portuguese) and then I found a few articles amongst the ones you provided that could be useful. It's very likely this article will exceed 100k bytes markup. Noah Talk 12:49, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Template:WikiProject Non-tropical storms
Is this template headed in the same direction as the previous three (i.e. Template:WikiProject Floods)? It's showing up in Category:WikiProject banners with formatting errors like the others did. JPG-GR (talk) 17:59, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
 * it should have already been taken care of by bot. Noah Talk 21:13, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The other three (Template:WikiProject Floods, Template:WikiProject Weather Data and Instrumentation, and Template:WikiProject Droughts and Fire Events) were, but this one doesn't appear to have been included in that bunch. JPG-GR (talk) 21:45, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks a lot! I have been trying to work on getting articles for the 2018 Featured Topic. Noah Talk 03:26, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Hurricane Olivia (2018)
Hey there, thanks again for your review of Martin Rundkvist. I took a look at your nomination too, but it looks like it's already in good shape, with three supports and a source review. But let me know if it gets to a place where you think it needs another set of eyes, or if you have another nomination that could do with a review, and I'd be happy to take a look. --Usernameunique (talk) 21:30, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The issue is the article only has two comprehensive reviews; flyby supports are weightied significantly less. At least from my experience, two reviews isn’t enough. The coordinators want people outside of WPTC to look at the articles as well. I will take a look at your nomination tonight sometime when I get home. Noah Talk 22:21, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Just went back to give this a review, and saw it had been promoted. Congrats! It's well deserved. --Usernameunique (talk) 06:35, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Promotion of Hurricane Olivia (2018)

 * +1! Awesome job Noah! Keep up the great work! 🌀CycloneFootball71🏈 |sandbox 14:53, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Hurricane Paulette
Hey Noah, I was considering reviewing Hurricane Paulette's GA nomination, but it is currently a C. I believe it meets B-class now, but could I get your opinion as well? Please take a look at the article just whenever you have time. Thank you! Jay Tee  🐦  13:09, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
 * It doesn't really matter what the article is listed at currently. I have had articles go from stub to GA simply because I didnt bother to update the status. An article could go from stub to FA without a GA review if it was written well enough. B-class is not really all that commonly used in this project and across Wikipedia. I would just review the GAN and list any concerns there as a temporary change in status to B-class would be rather pointless. The article doesn't look bad by any means. <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 13:35, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Sounds good, I just wanted to be sure to get another opinion on it. Thanks for the help. Jay  Tee  🐦  14:53, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Odd edits to Typhoon articles
Hi Noah, I have come across a user who has been making what a number of unexplained date related edits/moves to various typhoon articles, as well as changing disambiguation pages to lists (eg. List of typhoons named Matmo). (Full contributions.) I can't quite figure out what is going on, or whether it's productive. I was going to raise this in at WP:TC, but thought it might be best to check on a less public individual talk page first. Best, CMD (talk) 11:09, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * It's disruptive as it is changing a set of articles without discussion. There is no consensus to change disambiguations to list articles. <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 20:24, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * It does seem an odd change, but they are a new user. Unfortunately they have not replied to my talk page message. Is there a particular person in WP:TC who may be best to reach out regarding WP:TC practices, or should I enquire on the wikiproject page? CMD (talk) 02:26, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 * People have already tried to reach out by leaving customized warning messages without success. <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 10:06, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Template:WikiProject Non-tropical storms
Hi, what exactly have you been trying to do at Template:WikiProject Non-tropical storms? I see several edits of yours there, some of which are reversions. It's not a good idea to make untested changes to a live template: per WP:TESTCASES, the thing to do is copy Template:WikiProject Non-tropical storms to Template:WikiProject Non-tropical storms/sandbox, then set up some testcases at Template:WikiProject Non-tropical storms/testcases. When those are satisfactory, you can copy Template:WikiProject Non-tropical storms/sandbox to Template:WikiProject Non-tropical storms. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 20:31, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I needed to look at how a live article behaved with a taskforce parameter. I made sure nothing broke the template or caused unusual behavior before saving it. The change simply didn't do anything period when called on the article's talkpage. I didn't use testcases since this template is about to be merged + deleted. <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 20:47, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
 * In order to pass a value through to, the line should have been:  with optional spacing. None of your attempts matched that: most of them included an undesirable   so it wouldn't have worked. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 18:11, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh.. okay. I put up a request at Template talk:WikiProject Tropical cyclones for a change to place articles under WP Weather using the correct codes. <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 19:31, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Hurricane Olivia (2018) scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 10 August, 2021. Please check that the article needs no amendments. A coordinator will draft a blurb - based on your draft if the TFA came via TFA requests, or from an existing blurb on the FAC talk page if one has been posted. Feel free to comment on this. We suggest that you watchlist Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 13:19, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Article alerts/Log for Severe weather template
Hi, Template:WikiProject Severe weather doesn't have any talk pages associated with it, so it is triggering an error on the Article alerts/Log page. Just checking with you that the Severe weather project should probably be taken off the subscription list at Article_alerts/Subscription_list. I'm not sure which template has taken priority, maybe you can check to make sure that the current subprojects for weather/meterology are listed? Thanks~ --Funandtrvl (talk) 19:28, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, it can be removed. <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 21:48, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
 * done, thanks --Funandtrvl (talk) 17:40, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Anomalous cyclones task force
Hello, Hurricane Noah,

I've been going through inactive or defunct WikiProjects and found that many had set up dozens of article assessment categories but no members ever tagged any articles. So, they are just around 20+ empty categories.

I know you are involved with the Tropical Cyclones project and you set up this task force but there also some discussion about consolidating weather-related WikiProjects. So, do you expect categories in Category:Anomalous tropical cyclone articles by quality to ever be used? I'm really just doing clean up duties so if you expect articles to be assessed here, I'll leave them alone. But if you are closing up this task force, then I'll tidy things up. But knowing how active Tropical Cyclones is, I don't want to do anything without checking with y'all first. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 02:17, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I would wait for the additional discussion to close before taking any action regarding these categories. It has been quite a pain dealing with all the red tape. Hopefully, it will be done soon. <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 02:28, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * That's fine, it's certainly not an urgent matter. Good luck with your efforts to get consensus on moving forward. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 05:37, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2017–18 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mananjary.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

TFA
Thank you today for Hurricane Olivia (2018), about "a long-lasting Category 4 hurricane that affected Hawaii as a tropical storm in September 2018, shortly after Hurricane Lane passed by a few weeks prior"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:53, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Twenty-Tens Decade Started
Hey. I know we have crossed paths every now and then with weather articles, so I wanted to invite you to a new WikiProject, the WikiProject of the Twenty-Tens decade. It was proposed near the end of May, but it was officially created today. Not sure if you would be interested, but I thought I would drop you an invite and say hi. Elijahandskip (talk) 02:37, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Plan and check-in
Hey there Noah. My RL has been a struggle lately, trying to get music gigs, finding a new apartment, working too much and not being able to focus on my own needs enough. Things are still in flux, but at least I can squeeze in some time for some WP edits. My goal for the year has been to finish Draft:Tropical cyclone effects by region, as well as various weather articles for 2021 (including Weather in 2021, heat waves in 2021, etc.) ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 15:34, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I left a bunch of topic boxes on the WP Weather page regarding the 2018 year. Feel free to add anything I missed. I finished my portion of Fakir and have started helping with the season article for SWIO 17–18. We are going to have subsections underneath the effects table for severe, season-wide aftermath. For Fakir, KN may be finishing up the rest of it this weekend? In regards to work, a couple of weeks ago I had 6 days a week and did 7 AM - 11 PM on one of the days. <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 16:04, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
 * My time is still going to be limited in the near future. Much as I would love to have all of the time in the world for Wikipedia, I'm trying to prioritize my time. I've been on Wikipedia for almost 16 years, so I know there will always be tasks to complete, projects to finish, and the work will eventually get done. I just want to make sure that 16 years from now when I look back on this edit, I'll have lived my life truthfully, explored what I wanted, and I'm the type of musician I wanted to be. It's a tricky balance between work, life, and Wiki. Good work with Fakir :) ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 16:12, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I just wanted to ask you how you feel about having subsections under the effects table at 2017–18 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season? There's quite a bit of impact and aftermath for Reunion that is for the entire season as a whole. <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 21:09, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Fakir is at GAN and KN should be finishing the rest of the season article (my expansions brought it to 100k bytes markup). I am trying to finish Ivo '19 and get it out of my userspace before the semester begins. I plan to periodically do Gordon '18 during the semester. <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 20:21, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Great work on all these! So my weird/stressful summer is gradually coming to a close, and I was able to get some edits done, finally finishing Tropical cyclone effects by region. I'm not sure if it should be high or top importance. Next on my to do list is Weather of 2021 and the associated sub-articles, which would also be high importance. I want to get the articles ready so next year, we have in place yearly weather articles (list of floods, list of heat waves, etc). I want to get back to 2018 eventually though, it's just a slightly lower priority for my limited editing time. Hope you understand, and I hope school goes well this semester! ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 13:38, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Missing categories?
Hey HN, I saw you reverted my edit to WikiProject Weather/class; do you plan to create the Portal-Class assessment categories, as well as all the other assessment categories, that are now required for the project based on how you have set up the template? I pinged User:Funandtrvl, but got no response. Thanks in advance, UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:26, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it shouldnt be too hard to get those set up. <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 20:39, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, awesome. While you are at it could you also fix all your categories that are in Category:WikiProject assessment categories needing attention? Basically those have all been set up incorrectly, using the   parameter, rather than the correct class parameter.  Thanks in advance, UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:49, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I think we need to look very carefully at these categories before we set them up, for example, why do we need Category:Future-Class North Indian tropical cyclone articles or Category:Future-Class Southern Hemisphere tropical cyclone articles.Jason Rees (talk) 20:53, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Yo, HN, it has been two weeks and not a single needed category has been set up? Accordingly I am reverting the class page to the last good version.  Also pinging  and  once one of you has created all the necessary categories, feel free to revert my revert. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:48, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

48th issue of Hurricane Herald newsletter
 Light and Dark2000  🌀 (talk) 19:43, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Bishop Sycamore
Hi, just wanted to thank you again for your suggestion of Bishop Sycamore High School for In the News-it was an incredible, awful story! I did follow through and nominate it for DYK as I suggested, and it's passed. It should be published on the main page on the evening of the 20th in your time zone. It sounds really awful for those kids. Blythwood (talk) 23:25, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Temporary AP granted
Hi Hurricane Noah, I just wanted to let you know that I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&page=User%3AHurricane_Noah added] the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! ~TNT (she/they • talk) 22:55, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Granted for six months, lemme know when its almost expired and I'll review. ~TNT (she/they • talk) 22:55, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Page mover granted
Hello, Hurricane Noah. Your account has been [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3AHurricane_Noah granted] the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

Please take a moment to review Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when  is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:
 * Requested moves
 * Category:Requested moves, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! ~TNT (she/they • talk) 21:06, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I note for the record that I have done these two recent permissions changes after significant discussion with the editor in question. The user is trusted and understands policy on page moves, and I am going to be working closely with them/WP:WPTC to ensure that their local backlog is addressed with due care and attention. Many thanks ~TNT (she/they • talk) 21:09, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I will take it easy to start off per your recommendation and make sure I am doing things correctly when moving (checking in with experienced PMs or admins). I will work on cutting down the weather draft backlog before doing anything else. <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 23:12, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cyclone Fakir
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cyclone Fakir you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Destroyeraa-alt -- Destroyeraa-alt (talk) 00:01, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cyclone Fakir
The article Cyclone Fakir you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cyclone Fakir for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Destroyeraa-alt -- Destroyeraa-alt (talk) 20:21, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Tagging pages for speedy deletion G13
Hello, Hurricane Noah,

Please review WP:G13. Drafts can only be tagged CSD G13 after it has been at least six months since the last human edit. So, if you tagged a page today, the last edit would have to be April 3/4, 2021, depending on where you live. Not June, not July, but April. And if a draft is mistakenly tagged too early, it can be then tagged six months from today unless someone else edits the page in the intervening six months. There are other conditions that apply if you are tagging pages in User space but this is the only one for pages in Draft space.

If you have questions about this, just ask on my talk page or go to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 05:07, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
 * A draft being entirely blank for multiple months can't be deleted unless it is 6 months without a edit? Also, the template descriptions for g13 confusingly state "last constructive edit". That typically doesn't mean every edit counts, such as routine housekeeping. The reason I tagged such pages was as a result of those templates for G13. The only edits were routine procedures such as declining an AfC to remove it from the backlog, which wouldn't be a constructive edit. I would recommend changing those templates to explicitly state last human edit rather than last constructive edit. <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 12:17, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Hurricane Rosa (2018)
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for October 10, 2021. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/October 10, 2021. Sorry about the late notice. Congratulations on your work!—Wehwalt (talk) 20:36, 7 October 2021 (UTC) on behalf of Jimfbleak

Thank you today for the article! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:29, 10 October 2021 (UTC)