User talk:JMyrleFuller/Archive 1

Regarding edits made to Buffalo (NFL)
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, JMyrleFuller! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bangelfire\.com\/, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 23:58, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Regarding edits to Timmy (South Park character)
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, JMyrleFuller! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule proboards\d{1,3}\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 19:51, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Radio
You might be interested in joining WikiProject Radio. By the way, if you need help creating nonexistant 'years in radio' pages, please post a request to my talk page. --PhantomS 00:04, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Repost of Genesis Communications Network
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Genesis Communications Network, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Genesis Communications Network was previously deleted as a result of an articles for deletion (or another XfD) To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Genesis Communications Network, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Genesis Communications Network itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:59, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

John Batchelor
I don't understand what your spin on JB is all about. Why does "unsuccessful" require such a verbose elaboration? patsw 01:07, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

The Nighttime Price Is Right
A template has been added to the article The Nighttime Price Is Right, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. &mdash;Twigboy 14:57, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Freddie Dalton Thompson
Saw your edit summary comment - read the LA Times article that is cited. His birth name appears to have been Freddie, and he changed it in 1967 - whether officially or not is unknown at present. Tvoz | talk 03:58, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Crook & Chase
A tag has been placed on Crook & Chase requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Closedmouth 06:10, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wnss.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Wnss.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:28, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Wspqlogo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Wspqlogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Tradio
A tag has been placed on Tradio requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Master of Puppets Care to share?  04:20, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

WIBC/WNDE
Just curious, since I didn't live here at the time: I assume that WIBC's ESPN Radio affiliation from 1994-96 was limited to GameNight? Thanks, Lambertman (talk) 17:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


 * You know, my bad. If I'd looked harder I would've have seen you weren't the one that put that info in. Don't mind me. :) Lambertman (talk) 18:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Robin Hood: Men In Tights
Thank you for your contribution, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the Sandbox to get started. Eaglestorm (talk) 15:22, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Ti-Cats vs Bills
Do you have a source for the claim that Hamilton is the only team to have defeated an NFL team? I seem to recall reading of other Canadian—American football matches. Thanks. Double Blue (Talk) 07:06, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Nice. Thanks for the info. Double Blue  (Talk) 07:22, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Music of Your Life leaving Jones
I discovered this situation on a radio web site I go to which, being mostly message boards, is unacceptable as a source for this site. Do you have any valid sources and could you properly reference them in the various articles where you added this? Vchimpanzee ·  talk  ·  contributions  · 21:22, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. There were differing opinions on the site I go to on how or even whether Music of Your Life will continue. I did a brief search but found nothing. I feel guilty adding material to articles I don't have a source for, so I'm trying not to do it any more. Vchimpanzee ·  talk  ·  contributions  · 21:27, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

I checked in to see if anything had been added regarding the past weekend's developments. Obviously the article is outdated now and needs fixing, but I don't know where to get the information.

Actually, I do, but that source is not acceptable on this site. Vchimpanzee ·  talk  ·  contributions  · 21:18, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

NFL in Toronto
Hey, I just want to thank you for you're work on the National Football League in Toronto article. The article is really starting to take shape after all the work we've done. I just wanted to say that although you have added some great stuff, it would be better if they had sources. Contact me by writing on my talk page if you need help making citations or have anything else you would like to say or recommend.Joesixpac (talk) 02:37, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Wilfork fines
My main objection to the original form was that basically it seemed to be overwritten (too much of an emphasis on the fines). I still don't think it's particularly notable, but there's no negative connotations here, so I won't delete it. Samer (talk) 20:42, 29 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Yeah, it's hard to tell I'm a Pats fan looking at my contrib list. :) Seriously, though, if you had wanted to leave all of the info in (including the totals), I would have probably had to add that some of the fines were considered excessive, and that the NFL had actually reduced at least one of them. Samer (talk) 21:31, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

2008 NFL season
The NFL is from what I understand, trying to avoid a conflict with the Republican National Convention by either moving the Opening Kickoff game to September 5th, or starting the season a week later (on September 11th, coincidentally the seventh anniversary of the attacks). Additionally, the league is trying to pacify NBC, which has the rights to the 2008 Summer Olympics telecasts from Beijing as in that period, they would usually have three pre-season games telecast on Sunday nights, plus some of their affiliates, which have rights to pre-season games (The Giants on WNBC and the Chicago Bears on WMAQ-TV in Chicago as examples) are having no choice but to move those games to other stations during that periopd. The NFL is actively looking at all options even as we speak, hence the word "tenative" in all items regarding the scheduling. NoseNuggets (talk) 12:05 PM US EST Feb 6 2007.. —Preceding comment was added at 17:05, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Your edit to Canadian Football League
Do you have a reference to confirm the change in rights for terrestrial radio for the Grey Cup? I couldn't find anything that backs up your change to "The Fan Radio Network". -Bdoserror (talk) 22:48, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

List of characters on The Phil Hendrie Show
Another editor has added the  template to the article List of characters on The Phil Hendrie Show, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 15:08, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

WGDJ
The callsign meaning previously added to WGDJ may be correct but no sources have been provided. You are encouraged to readd this information once sufficent references are provided.--Rtphokie (talk) 01:08, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

David Paterson
Please discuss at Talk:David Paterson. You weren't the first person with this idea! Consensus is that we want the article accurate at a time of high visibility. Thanks! - Colfer2 (talk) 12:57, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Minion
Hi there. I reverted this edit to Minion (typeface) because I really don't think extracting and using bundled fonts is legit, and we really shouldn't be involved in contributory infringement. Although I remember reading a thread in Typophile a couple of years ago that stated fonts bundled in Adobe software aren't subject to specific licensing, I don't think this should be in the article in the absence of a reliable source saying "yes, it's OK to do this". Best, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:25, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

The Price is Right in 1986
Hi. I reverted one of your edits to the show article. The Tom Kennedy version was still on the air, though in reruns, when the CBS prime-time specials were on in the summer of 1986. Best, JTRH (talk) 12:26, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Jamestown Jets
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place  on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Ros0709 (talk) 21:28, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Peter Tilden
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Peter Tilden, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rtphokie (talk) 12:37, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Invite
69.23.202.204 (talk) 20:34, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Fox News Sunday
On 11 November 2007 and 1 December 2007 you edited the article on Fox News Sunday to say that it's the second-lowest rated of the Sunday talk shows. What's your source on that? And what is that compared to? Are you just comparing it to one show each on ABC, CBS, NBC, and CNN? - Shaheenjim (talk) 14:57, 10 August 2008 (UTC)


 * In some markets Fox News Sunday does have local news as a lead-in. I suspect that its relatively low ratings are due to the fact that Fox's network news in general is less well established than the other networks.  And again, when you say that it's the second-lowest rated of the Sunday talk shows, what is that compared to? Are you just comparing it to one show each on ABC, CBS, NBC, and CNN? - Shaheenjim (talk) 06:06, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of Match Game panelists and other key personnel
I have nominated List of Match Game panelists and other key personnel, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/List of Match Game panelists and other key personnel. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? —  Dæ dαlusContribs /Improve 06:32, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Tradio
I have nominated Tradio, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Tradio. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. —  Dæ dαlusContribs /Improve 20:09, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

WKBW-TV
You put on the WKBW-TV article that channel 7 is testing revivals of eyewitness news on some of their newscasts. how do you know? is you don't tell me i'm deleting that belief on the article.Waluigi300 (talk) 16:33, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

USFL Cut/Paste
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give a different title by copying its content and pasting it into. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is considered undesirable because it splits the page history which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen.

Question about WKBW
Good day, sorry to bother you. Is the 2:00 am news brief called eyewitness news everynite, and if it is do they play move closer to your world?Waluigi300 (talk) 00:44, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

The Big Change
Do you know anything about WKBW's big change that is supposed to occur tomorrow. I heared it's an Eyewitness News Revival —Preceding unsigned comment added by Waluigi300 (talk • contribs) 19:31, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. AnnaJGrant (talk) 09:51, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi how are you doing —Preceding unsigned comment added by Black Reign 56 (talk • contribs) 15:19, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Steve Sommers
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Steve Sommers, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * unsourced BLP of questionable notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  brew crewer  (yada, yada) 04:57, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

BLP violation on Michael Smerconish
Hi. Per WP:BLP, which is one of the most stringently-enforced policies on Wikipedia, you should not feel like you have the latitude to add in casual accusations to articles that suggest that a particular person condones the use of torture, or even holds particular political views. The very beginning of the BLP policy states that "Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons—whether the material is negative, positive, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion." Because of this, I've removed your recent contributions to the article. If you really feel this information is important to have in the article, do some proper research, find high-quality sources that back up every claim you're making, and then re-add the content with those sources in place. Thanks.  Warren -talk- 18:48, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

College Basketball on ESPN
I was wondering if you could add your expertise to my new article. Thanks!--Levineps (talk) 05:16, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

June 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. No source. (Tomballguy)--(talk)--(evidence)--( 21:52, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

UFL Pages moved
Hey, just so you know, I reverted your moves of the pages for the teams of the UFL. I did this because, per wikirules, they should not have been moved until the team names are confirmed by the league. Your cited sources weren't sufficient to support the original moves, as a message board post violates WP:RS and using the USPTO constitutes WP:OR. To make those changes before the official names are confirmed also runs up against WP:CRYSTALBALL.

Of course, if those names are in fact the correct official names, I'll go back and move them back myself. But at least we'll have good, reliable sources to back us up.oknazevad (talk) 02:15, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Help on Thumb Radio
I would like to know if you could help contribute to Thumb Radio, which has recently been nominated for deletion. Since you have contributed to a radio station in the Thumb area of Michigan, your knowledge is needed. I created the page about the uniqueness of radio stations in the thumb area. Please take a minute to edit this one of a kind page.Cgord (talk) 19:41, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Post your comment about thumb radio Cgord (talk) 20:44, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Southtowns
If you can add proper citations from WP:RS for your newly added content like the rest of the Southtowns article, we probably have a good shot at taking this article to WP:GA status.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 21:46, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

This may seem out of the blue
I noticed your insightful edit about the dropping of affiliates at Air America Media. I was impressed and got a little curious, and so I checked out your editing history. I saw that you've made 11,700 edits, and over 95% are to articles! I looked at some examples, and they seem to be overwhelmingly content adds, and factually correct. From your talk page, it seems that you've never gotten a Barnstar for all your work. I don't know if you like these things, but I think you deserve this:

P.S. I don't give these out much. In two years here, I have only given out a Barnstar one other time. Also, I hope you don't feel your privacy is being invaded-- I would never touch any edits found this way, and I won't examine them again. All the best. Diderot's  dreams  (talk) 22:16, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

WONS-LP edit
You had recently made an edit to the article for WONS-LP which I corrected. WONS was never a repeater for the WNGS signal. I worked for WONS for nearly 14 years before leaving the Olean area and I still have a close relationship with the owner of the station. This past July while I was in Olean I spoke with the station owner and asked him about the claim that channel 25 was a repeater of the channel 67 signal. He was just as surprised at that revelation as I originally was. The fact is that WONS shared the UPN affiliation and gave ratings credit to WNGS in return for advertising time during the UPN programming block. (We inserted the WNGS logo on screen during the UPN programming for anyone in the area who had a ratings diary.) No other WNGS programs were ever aired on WONS during the shared affiliation or afterward. In fact, we received most all of our network information through WBGT, the Rochester, NY UPN affiliate instead of WNGS. Also it should be noted that WONS actually ceased carrying the UPN programming once WNGS was placed on the Adelphia Cable (now Time-Warner) in Olean. This actually occured before WNGS lost the UPN affiliation to WNLO in 2003, although I'm not sure exactly when that occurred. And from what I understand, WONS still carries programming from the Sportsman Channel, although I am unsure what arrangement they have for doing so. RevJPW (talk) 05:15, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks for your note concerning the confusion around WONS. FWIW, the AOL Television web site (http://tvlistings.aol.com/listings/ny/olean/time-warner-cable-wny-olean-standard?hid=NY31406&zipcode=14760&tab=grid) does list WONS programming for the Time-Warner cable line-up in Olean and includes WONS on channel 15. The listings for 10:00pm through 10:00am is Sportsman Channel programming, but from 10:00am to 10:00pm it says "To Be Announced". (AOL Television gets its listings from Zap2it.) I do know that the station owner is a bit lax in updating the programming listings for publication, so there is no telling if the listings are accurate. I do know that when I was visiting there in July, WONS was airing hunting and fishing programs which I assume are from Sportsman Channel. I'm not sure what kind of agreement WONS may have with them, if any. It could be another network and the listings are inaccurate. RevJPW (talk) 01:19, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Charlie Brown's Christmas Tales
I understand why you are claiming that CB Christmas Tales was dropped this year, but it's really not the case. It's slated to air following the unedited A CB Christmas on December 15th. You can verify this at the ABC site. - Nat Gertler (talk) 17:01, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Faux Cyrillic
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Faux Cyrillic. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Faux Cyrillic (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:17, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alice Kryzan


The article Alice Kryzan has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsuccessful candidate for several public offices - does not meet WP:POLITICIAN

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lincolnite (talk) 23:58, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello JMyrleFuller! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:40, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) M. G. Kelly -
 * 2) Margaret Shulock -
 * 3) Papa Joe Chevalier -
 * 4) Max Armstrong -

AfD nomination of New United States Football League
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is New United States Football League. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/New United States Football League. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Howard Simon (sportscaster)


The article Howard Simon (sportscaster) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unremarkable person. Does not meet criteria for WP:PEOPLE or WP:CREATIVE. Only news mentions are from 2004 when he moved to WGR.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. avs5221 (talk) 04:17, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pulse87.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Pulse87.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 23:24, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mike Randall (entertainer)
A tag has been placed on Mike Randall (entertainer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Xtzou ( Talk ) 14:56, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of War Memorial Auditorium


The article War Memorial Auditorium has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 12:48, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

USFL
Thanks for putting that source in about the Bandits and 1986. Man I miss the USFL, I am probably the only one.... Dbrodbeck (talk) 00:14, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Selective TV, Inc.
A tag has been placed on Selective TV, Inc. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 01:53, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Selective TV, Inc.
I have nominated Selective TV, Inc., an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Selective TV, Inc.. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. UtherSRG (talk) 07:02, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Trenton Steel was New Jersey Kings?
What's your source for that? The Steel are league-owned, while the Kings had diffrerent ownership but never got off the ground. Tom Danson (talk) 20:18, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Gosple of John
It would help if you could give a citation reference for the observations you have made:

"The gospel of John gives no account of Nativity of Jesus, unlike those of Matthew and Luke, and although Jesus's father is twice named as 'Joseph', his mothers name is never given. In Chapter 7 41-42, and again in 7:52, John records some of the crowd dismissing the possibility of Jesus's being the Messiah, on the grounds that the Messiah must be a descendent of David and born in Bethlehem, stating that Jesus instead came out of Galilee; John made no effort to refute or correct this, and this has been advanced as implying that John rejected the synoptic tradition of Jesus's birth in Bethlehem. Other commentators see this as characteristic Johannine irony; placing in the mouths of opponents of Jesus, statements that both the gospel writer and his readership know to be mistaken."


 * The argument that John is here being ironic is fairly commonly argued; and I am sure you have good grounds for presenting the contrary position from published sources; but I have not been able to find it. The problem is that the statements "Jesus is not of the line of David" and "Jesus was not born in Bethlehem" stand or fall together.  If the one is non-ironic, so too must be the other.  But the tradition of Jesus being of Davidic descent does seem to have been widespread from an early date (Romans 1:3, 2 Timothy 2:8, Revelation 22:16). So can it really be maintained that the writer of John's Gospel did not intend the denial of Jesus descent from David to be ironic?  But if that is conceded, the case against his being born in Bethlehem appears to fall too.  Can you give a reference to a published author who argues against this point?  TomHennell (talk) 21:03, 31 July 2010 (UTC)


 * hank you for your comment. The quotation you cited was altered from what I originally posted. I only posted that the Gospel of John's sole reference to the Nativity was at least apparently contradictory to the nativity story found in Luke and Matthew. This is not verbatim how I put it in that particular article, but as I wrote it in Nativity of Jesus:


 * "The Gospel of John makes only a passing reference to the nativity in a discussion among Pharisees in chapter 7. John 7:42 quotes a Pharisee as saying "Shall Christ come out of Galilee? Hath not the Scripture said, That Christ cometh of the seed of David, and out of the town of Bethlehem," and later in 7:52 the same Pharisee states "Search, and look: for out of Galilee ariseth no prophet," stating that Jesus was not born in Bethlehem but in Galilee. John does nothing to refute or correct the Pharisee (nor to affirm him) in his claim. This is the only reference to the birth of Jesus in the Gospel of John; John instead focuses on the concept of the Word of God become flesh."


 * I am not of sufficient expertise to answer your question on irony, and I did not put that statement there; someone else who edited the page after me did. An earlier edit of mine had in fact claimed that John implicitly endorsed it, but I revised that statement as it would be in the realm of original research and conjecture on my part, which obviously doesn't belong here. The main point I was trying to make in that statement is the difference between the nativity in Matthew and Luke and the picture given by this conversation in John, which can be fairly stated given the scripture alone. Feel free to revise/remove at your own discretion.J. Myrle Fuller (talk) 02:36, 1 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for making that clear, I am though still looking for a citation source for the statement that John 7:42 tends to call the birth of Bethlehem into question; I am sure that this argument has been made (if onlybecause a number of commentators go to lengths to rebut it) but I am not sure where.  It is a major theme of this gospel that the Jewish authorities misunderstood and misconstrued the mission and nature of Jesus, whereas those reborn in the faith (who include both the evangelist and his readership) are enabled to understand Jesus correctly (see John 1: 10-13).  This underlying irony is then exemplified in various specifically ironic passages - statements made by the antagonists of Jesus that the reader is assumed to know to be mistaken (John 11:56; and also double ironies - statements by the antagonists of Jesus that are wrong in the sense intended by those that make them, but actually true in a deeper, unintended sense (John 11:50).  Sometimes John 'corrects' mistaken statements, more often he does not (see John 7:52, and compare 2 Kings 14:25 where it is stated that the prophet Jonah came from Gath-hepher in Galilee) . But it would be helpful if a more skeptical approach could be referenced in a published and authoritative source. TomHennell (talk) 22:50, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
for your informative edits to the Kristin Davis (politician) article.  Tisane  talk/stalk 18:40, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Note
Kindly do not add uncited information in the Bruce Blakeman biography. Kindly read our WP:BLP policy. Each and every statement (please note: each and every statement) has to be replicated directly from a reliable source. If you have any reliable source supporting your addition and if that information is directly (not indirectly, please note, "directly") related to Bruce Blakeman's biography, go ahead and add it without any issue. Kindly contact me on my talk page for any further clarification. Warm regards.  Wifione    .......  Leave a message  02:22, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Black Sunday (1977 film). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 01:15, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nfl europe 100.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:Nfl europe 100.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:33, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Bruce Blakeman
Please comment. Bearian (talk) 20:15, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Warren Redlich
I cropped your added comments per WP:UNDUE - you gave too much undue weight to the defamatory accusations. "Can't we all just get along?" Bearian (talk) 17:16, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I assumed good faith, but overenthusiasism is a fault many of us share. Bearian (talk) 17:48, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

AfD
Please see the nomination of this article, which you contributed to, thanks.Articles for deletion/Nancy Bargar Borock (talk) 13:27, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Please also see Articles for deletion/Texas Straw Poll. Regards Hekerui (talk) 15:31, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Your edits to List of gridiron football quarterbacks passing statistics
I appreciate your edits to the page, however the page is essentially an outdoor gridiron football page. I reverted your edits, however I noted at the bottom of the article that the leaders in the categories are for the outdoor game. If you want, perhaps you could create a leader board page for the indoor game and then add it to the see also section of the outdoor game page. I believe that this would give the proper notability of the indoor game so it isn't forgotten entirely. Thanks. Stylteralmaldo (talk) 15:45, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Help offered.
The work you mentioned needing help with I've worked on today, will continue later.



This lousy t-shirt (talk) is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Xmas, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding to your friends' talk pages.

Nomination of United States Football Alliance for deletion
The article United States Football Alliance is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/United States Football Alliance until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Paul McDonald (talk) 14:55, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Buffalo Gladiators for deletion
The article Buffalo Gladiators is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Buffalo Gladiators until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Paul McDonald (talk) 05:10, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Christmas number one single
Hi, now that Christmas number one single is a disambiguation page, please help WP:FIXDABLINKS. This tool is a great help (works best in Firefox). Thanks, -- Ja Ga  talk 21:25, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Seaboard Football League


The article Seaboard Football League has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable semi-professional football league, fails WP:N and WP:NSPORTS. No independent reliable sources provided, fails WP:RS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Paul McDonald (talk) 16:35, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrolled
Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:
 * This permission does not give you any special status or authority
 * Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
 * You may wish to display the Autopatrolled top icon and/or the User wikipedia/autopatrolled userbox on your user page
 * If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
 * If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 21:46, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Northeastern Football Alliance for deletion
The article Northeastern Football Alliance is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Northeastern Football Alliance until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Paul McDonald (talk) 21:36, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

You were correct
You were correct to remove the second WP:PROD on Seaboard Football League. I had forgotten that you had previouisly removed the PROD and I should have instead sent it to AFD. I apologize for my error. I have been careful to watch that I do not make such a blunder and missed this one case, perhaps I may miss more--but it will never be on purpose. I will review the page, any changes and additions you have made, and consider sending it to AFD or leaving it alone.--Paul McDonald (talk) 03:54, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Seaboard Football League for deletion
The article Seaboard Football League is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Seaboard Football League until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Paul McDonald (talk) 04:05, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Your comments
I just noticed your revision comments at Seaboard Football League where you say "revising to Minor instead of semi-pro to try and drive away the troll" and I can only assume you were writing about me. If you truly believe that I am being disruptive, then your next step should be to go to Dispute resolution requests and read up on how to report me to an administrator for review of my actions on Wikipedia. If instead you would like to address any issues directly, please go to my talk page and post your concerns there. Cheers!--Paul McDonald (talk) 05:29, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts
Hello,. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikiquette alerts regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Paul McDonald (talk) 15:01, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Whalers Hockey Fest
Hey. I noticed you added the ARMY-AIC game and the Bruins-Whalers alumni game to List of outdoor hockey games as they were part of Whalers Hockey Fest. However, there were also two UConn games and various high school and local games during the Hockey Fest which are not included. So the question is, do we include all of them in the table, or do we just include the Whale Bowl, with a link to a separate article Whalers Hockey Fest with details on the other games? And if we do add the games, do we add all of them, or just NCAA and AHL ones? Smartyllama (talk) 23:08, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Request
You recently contributed to Big Chuck and Lil' John. I am requesting your input on the article's discussion page at Talk:Big_Chuck_and_Lil'_John. Thank you. Levdr1 (talk) 19:31, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your input. Levdr1 (talk) 01:21, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Recent edits to political articles
I noticed that, since I watch so many Upstate New York political articles, that you have made several constructive, well-written edits. If you could find some citations, that would be good, too, but we can wait. Thanks again for your work! Bearian (talk) 01:25, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Black players in American professional football
I agree with you. The article is so tremendously undersourced and such a complicated and notable issue, no one should be deleting anything that is from a notable source. The idea here is to add content and then build a consensus based on verifiable, reliable sources. 66.234.33.8 (talk) 23:52, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

WGRF
Hi, Just wanted to say I appreciate your addendum regarding the history of 97 Rock. I hadn't seen the page in about a year before now, but previously I'd been watching to see if anyone could explain the sudden format change and subsequent switch-back. Thanks! 74.77.140.209 (talk) 05:33, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I meant to sign: D. J. Cartwright (talk) 05:35, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

TKO Radio Network
As this article has an extensive edit history, I've erred on the side of caution and am not speedy deleting it. I have prodded it on your behalf though, but feel free to deprod if your intentions have changed. Thryduulf (talk) 15:06, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

ABC Daytime
What's your source for the statement that ABC is returning the General Hospital time slot to the affiliates in Sept. 2012? JTRH (talk) 19:09, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I got that from the 2011 in American television article. The two sources are as follows:
 * Official: Couric Headed to ABC Broadcasting & Cable June 6, 2011

J. Myrle Fuller (talk) 19:16, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, OK. I didn't see a cite for it. Thanks. JTRH (talk) 19:26, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Merged article
You are the only one that seems to be involved with an article I took from Bert Bert and put in your article. I am not going to merge "reintegration" and "the slow reintegration" ...which is blatant NPOV violation...on talk page i said it was borderline; it's not, it's blatant 66.234.33.8 (talk) 22:38, 21 August 2011 (UTC)\ I will fold my stuff under "the slow reintegration". I could care less what goes on in the article. If you do not want to rectify it, then I do not care one bit. 66.234.33.8 (talk) 22:41, 21 August 2011 (UTC) And I am not blaming you for the title of that section. I did not do forensics on the article. But at the top of the page I bet there is a 5 pillars of Wikipedia and 1 will be : Be Bold. There is a cleanup tag. Clearly you are a very experienced wikipedia user and you should never let that get away. 66.234.33.8 (talk) 22:43, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Issues being fixed, sections being consolidated and redundancies removed, and headers being neutralized. J. Myrle Fuller (talk) 22:55, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Wise. I would have left in that Strode and Washington played in semi-pro ball for a few years. It gets hammered home in sources because of the wear and tear he suffered over the years before he joined the NFL. Also, the reintegration thingie I had it originally as 2 paragraphs. Strode's book is fun to read and gives some good stuff of what happened in his first few years on the field. Lots of sources out there. I added them to further reading and put on the talk page what each book, to the best of my memory, could add to the article. Thanks. 66.234.33.8 (talk) 10:04, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I would expect at least 10 books out there that can easily be added to the further reading list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.234.33.8 (talk) 10:07, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Cliff Hangers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cliff Hangers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cliff Hangers (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Gh87 (talk) 11:35, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

HSBC Arena listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect HSBC Arena. Since you had some involvement with the HSBC Arena redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Powers T 16:03, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Cliff Hangers
An article that you have been involved in editing, Cliff Hangers, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Gh87 (talk) 20:26, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

NY-09
So it's not a remotely big deal, but I noticed you changed the District 9 section of United States House of Representatives elections in New York, 2010 to say the district "is widely expected to change significantly or be effectively eliminated in redistricting." I don't know if you'd noticed, but I'd previously edited it to avoid that particular wording as I don't think it's supported by the references. So I was just wondering why you think it ought to say that rather than something more cautious. Thanks! – hysteria18 (talk) 15:12, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanksgiving games pre-1920
No problem. I'm still slowly looking up Thanksgiving Day and regualr season scores from the Ohio League, Pennsylvania Pro Circuit, the mid-west teams and NYPFL (pre-1920) for the article. Pennsylvania Penguin (talk) 12:46, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.


 * 2011 NBA lockout (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * was linked to Ben Gordon, Derrick Williams

Any suggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:12, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In Prep & Landing: Naughty vs. Nice, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Hacker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In History of the National Football League in Los Angeles, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Inland Empire (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Sunday morning talk shows, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TV One (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 25 December 2011 (UTC)