User talk:Juliancolton/Archive 4

Climate content check in Everglades
Howdy. I'm looking for specific help in looking over the content of the Climate section in the Everglades article. I see your name and HurricanHink's at FA reviewing and nominating climate articles... I'm not really handy with climatology issues, but I read what I could and tried my best to understand it. I'm concerned with accuracy and comprehensiveness mostly, and that what I've written is clear. Thanks for what you can do. --Moni3 (talk) 16:47, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you. FYI, there is a discussion about the lead sentence. Some people think the old one (without the bold title, that you objected to) is better. IMO the old one was better but I don't really have a dog in the fight. Feel free to chime in if you wish Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Roads Dave (talk) 18:12, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the Barnstar and the kind words. It was fun to write that article, and I'm glad you enjoyed it.Dave (talk) 05:33, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles May Newsletter
The May Newsletter for WikiProject Good Articles has now been published. Dr. Cash (talk) 22:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Passed New York State Route 308
Congrats! You have earned the newest GA in Wikipedia. Imzadi1979 (talk) 16:59, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Effects of Hurricane Dennis in Georgia
Your good article nomination for the article Effects of Hurricane Dennis in Georgia has passed, see Talk:Effects of Hurricane Dennis in Georgia noting my passage of the article. Terrific work! Hello32020 (talk) 01:40, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #16
The April issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 04:08, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hurricane Cosme (2007)
Your good article nomination for the article Hurricane Cosme (2007) has passed, see Talk:Hurricane Cosme (2007) noting my passage of the article. Great job improving it! Hello32020 (talk) 14:08, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

A suggestion for list of Maryland hurricanes
In your sandbox number 2, you are making a list of Maryland hurricanes. Might I suggest including the District of Columbia? In terms of area, DC is tiny compared to Maryland, and I find it hard to imagine a hurricane affecting DC and not Maryland. Having a list of Washington DC hurricanes would basically be a subset of the Maryland list. Basically, I am suggesting this because I don't see it necessary to split Maryland and DC. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 02:32, 5 May 2008 (UTC)


 * You could. An alternative would be seeing if a cyclone did anything notable there (eg. washing out a bridge) and then simply expanding its bulleted description. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 23:54, 5 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I'd choose the one that includes both parts (DC and MD). If there is a short collective term for Maryland and DC together, that could be used. But I don't really have any problem with just Maryland. Need any assistance? Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 01:06, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Georges assessment
Um, this article was reviewed previously to be an A previously, and saying "I don't think this is A" does not really say what is wrong with the article. Why did you demote it? Tito xd (?!? - cool stuff) 02:46, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

FAC
I could use some backup on the FAC for the Super Tuesday outbreak for embolding EF ratings and and risk levels. I can't think of any way to defend it, I just know it should be done. Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 00:57, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I have posted a notice regarding my status on my user page and talk page. Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 02:23, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

USRD Newsletter, Issue 4

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Want to change your method of delivery? – It's all here. —Rschen7754bot (talk) 05:29, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Resolved comments template
Well that kicks ass. Thanks for the heads up! The Rambling Man (talk) 16:20, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

RfA time
 TenPoundHammer would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact TenPoundHammer to accept or decline the nomination. A page for your nomination at Requests for adminship/ . If you accept the nomination, you must state and sign your acceptance. You may also choose to make a statement and/or answer the optional questions to supplement the information your nominator has given. Once you are satisfied with the page, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 20:04, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I wish you had contacted me before accepting the RfA. From our work so far, there were some important admin-related matters that you were unfamiliar with. Some of your replies to my block questions gave the impression that you still needed to learn when blocking is appropriate. I'm free now (I just finished my last final a few hours ago), so I can dedicate more time towards bringing you up to speed with all our policies. 21:29, 7 May 2008 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nishkid64 (talk • contribs)

Your RfA etc


Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend and remember :"All men are created equal, but ambition, or lack of it, soon separates them." Cheers, and happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
 * Please don't feel hard done by or the like because your RfA did not succeed. Just because you felt forced to withdraw should not be seen as a rejection. Instead, see it as a challenge to prove your opposers wrong. So, don't leave Wikipedia or anything or even get ideas about leaving. You do an ideal thing in that when you edit an article, you make it better than it was before. You are an excellent example of what everyone should strive to do. Please stay here and keep up the good article work. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 22:28, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

The iconography of it all
How do you code the GA, etc., icons on the top of your main page like that? It would shorten my userpage significantly if I knew how to do that. Thegreatdr (talk) 13:36, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the help...it is done. I like that it goes down the right side of the page like that.  =)  Thegreatdr (talk) 14:28, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Why are you putting it uppercase at Template:Resolved comments?
If you do this, then people who use the parameter in lowercase will not be able to use it. That is why most templates use lowercase for parameters. Gary  K ing ( talk ) 21:47, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Tropical cyclones
I was looking for things to create, but can't seem to find anything. What do you think is the project's most needed article (preferably a storm). STORMTRACKER   94  Go Irish! 22:08, 9 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I would have expanded the article, but I had events going on (you beat me to it). I'm getting excited for hurricane season (only about three weeks left!). STORMTRACKER    94  Go Irish! 00:18, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 2nd and 9th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:02, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

AWB
Have you used AWB before? I'm going to make a major change to the template and it'd be helpful if you could change the pages that are currently using the template by using the tool. Gary  K ing ( talk ) 21:39, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm going to break rc and build it back up from scratch, which will definitely break pages using it. Go through and you can fix them by replacing resolved comments with rcold.  Gary  K ing  ( talk ) 21:44, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I strongly don't recommend that. If the template is used on less than 500 pages, I would consider it not under heavy usage. We can leave it on archived pages, but probably fix it on active pages. Gary  K ing  ( talk ) 21:50, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I guess you just want the username but no formatting? Signing would be easiest for people to use since for those with long usernames, it can be quite the pain to type out. Gary  K ing  ( talk ) 21:53, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
 * What do you mean? If a user signs, then the timestamp is there. I don't see what the problem with using that is? Gary  K ing  ( talk ) 03:41, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Just to say hai


Tinucherian has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend or a possibly new friend. Cheers, and happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Have a great day ! --  TinuCherian  (Wanna Talk?) - 10:31, 12 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the smile back ! :D --  TinuCherian  (Wanna Talk?) - 09:22, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

WP:LOTM
Just a reminder that the voting will be open for about another week.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 08:09, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the solution at the help desk. Remember to vote at WP:LOTM if you get a chance.  Voting feedback is whaat makes it run.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 16:07, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

WBOSITG's RfA
 Hello Juliancolton, I'd like to take this opportunity to thank you for your participation in my RfA which was passed with a final tally of 114/10/4. I'm both shocked and honoured to gain so much support from users whom I admire and trust, and I hope I can avoid breaking that backing by being the best administrator I possibly can. I will take on board the opposition's comments and I hope to improve over the coming months and years. Once again, thank you!  weburiedoursecrets inthegarden  20:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

RFPP
Hello, Juliancolton. I see that a newly registered user is vandalising your userpage. Have you ever thought about requesting your page to be protected? If you were to have an admin protect your userpage, I would suggest semi-protecting, because then, only accounts older than four days can edit it. If you request PP, then it will possibly prevent him from vandalising your userpage. Thanks! Schfifty Three  22:27, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 12th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:09, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Record locator
I've reverted this to its last good version and removed the speedy- remember to check article histories before tagging. J Milburn (talk) 19:56, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

TfD
I asked that it not be used because it includes no sig and can be used disruptively; it is being used in FACs, creating extra work.

TfD nomination of Template:Resolved comments
Template:Resolved comments has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Sandy Georgia (Talk) 23:03, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Julian, I explained in several places that this redundant template would be disruptive at FAC because it doesn't include a signature or timestamp, and I asked that MFC's script not be used; it is being used. I have no recourse but to TfD. Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 23:17, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry to have to do that, Julian, but comments that are capped without a sig just create too much potential for abuse and a problem. Thanks for understanding.  Best, Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 23:32, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for reverting the recent edits made by 163.153.76.21. The students involved have been identified, and the district has reported that it is taking appropriate action. --NERIC-Security (talk) 11:42, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/Boston Red Sox seasons
...and ✅ «  Milk's Favorite Cøøkie  (  talk  /  contribs ) 14:21, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
 * ...Missed that one. (✅) «  Milk's Favorite Cøøkie  (  talk  /  contribs ) 15:04, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay thanks. Do you mind reviewing an of my other FLC's? That would help. Thanks - «  Milk's Favorite Cøøkie  (  talk  /  contribs ) 16:05, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Done here. Similar to Stanley_Cup, I just renamed the "References" section to "Notes" Thanks, «  Milk's Favorite Cøøkie  (  talk  /  contribs ) 16:23, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks -


 * Sure, you deserved it. Well, I'm sure there are some on my userpage. Thanks for the help. «  Milk's Favorite Cøøkie  (  talk  /  contribs ) 16:44, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Done here. I'll do the last "optional" one, after I take care of comments on other FLC's. Hope you don't mind. «  Milk's Favorite Cøøkie  (  talk  /  contribs ) 18:15, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay done with the references, along with any other comments on the FLC. Thanks, «  Milk's Favorite Cøøkie  (  talk  /  contribs ) 18:36, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
 * 1 minute late Julian «  Milk's Favorite Cøøkie  (  talk  /  contribs ) 18:38, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I appreciate your reviews and look forward to one's in the other FLC's. Thanks again. «  Milk's Favorite Cøøkie  (  talk  /  contribs ) 19:01, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

GA Review
Could you please review The Dundies for GA when you get the chance? I see that you have reviewed other articles relating to it. Red Thunder  14:56, 17 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Sorry about that (The backlog was so big that I needed to find someone). Red  Thunder  15:08, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Route 21A issue
Hi there. It has come to my attention that you want NYS Route 21A (page) To Be deleted. I, however realize why you determine it's this haox of rumor. I think it's not on websites because the newsmen don't allow people to post info on websites they can't edit the info on till the route is complete. That's a guess.

Note To Juliancolton: I will give you a souce about it ASAP. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Check77 (talk • contribs) 18:28, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Source for NY 21A
[] is the source I found I will continue to find other sources to give you other "Heads - up" about the NY Route 21A issue.

--Check77 (talk) 19:33, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Homeschooling May 2008 Newsletter
 The message above has been delivered by Diligent Terrier Bot, a bot operated by Diligent Terrier.

USRD participants list
As discussed at WT:USRD, the participants list at WP:USRD is being split by state. Due to any of the following factors- your extended participation in WT:USRD discussions, your IRC participation, or your extended participation in Shields or Maps, I have guessed that you are a nationwide editor and have designated you as such in the USRD partiicpants table. This is part of the lengthy process. If this is in error, please let me know immediately. This is especially likely with this group as I have to guess whether you are a national or a state editor. Regards, Rschen7754 (T C) 22:00, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Other wikipedias
Thanks for the fast reply!

Does that mean then that i can make a language link between two different language versions of my user name just like on any other wiki article?

& ps. if i leave an answer just after your answer on another page - will you automatically know i've answered you? (cause i wasnt sure, that's why i'm writing you here!)

A. Aryadne (talk) 16:13, 19 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much again, it is all clearing it up - especially that thing about the watchlist, i was wondering how that worked.


 * I'm adding you straight away as a friend of mine - you have been very helpful !


 * A. Aryadne (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 16:37, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

DYK crediting
Thanks for doing the crediting for this round!  Royal broil  18:50, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

thank you!
I'll try to make my editing as accurate as possible! Dewi75 (talk) 19:53, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

NYC Meetup: June 1, 2008
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, elect a board of directors, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the last meeting's minutes).

We'll also review our recent Wikipedia Takes Manhattan event, and make preparations for our exciting successor Wiki Week bonanza, being planned with Columbia University students for September or October.

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

Also, check out our regional US Wikimedia chapters blog Wiki Northeast (and we're open to guest posts). This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:00, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Hangon, then what??
i no you can put hangon in –  but what is the other one to perform the other kind of showing of need of deletion or whatever that is....    So what is itI put a souce??????????????????????????????????????????????????

--Check77!!!!! Check77!!!!! 00:01, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

My Recent Rfa
Although you opposed me in my recent RFA I will still say thanks as from your comments and the other users comments that opposed me I have made a todo list for before my next RFA. I hope I will have resolved all of the issues before then and I hope that you would be able to support me in the future. If you would like to reply to this message or have any more suggestions for me then please message me on my talk page as I will not be checking back here. Thanks again. ·Add§hore· T alk/C ont 16:20, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Whoops!! Thanks for making that adjustment so the count will be correct, my bad!! Accounting4Taste: talk 17:08, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks...
...for reverting vandalism to my talk page! :)  weburiedoursecrets  inthegarden  18:11, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Template for requesting deletion... for Hangon then what
--Check77!!!!! Check77!!!!! 20:16, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

David 1979
Not much to look up. The Daily Weather Maps during the period in question show that Buffalo received 0.05" of rainfall during David's passage. Unless it fell within 10 minutes, the rainfall was unlikely to be heavy since heavy rainfall is defined by US METAR code as a rate of at least 0.30" per hour. Thegreatdr (talk) 20:47, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

WP:LOTD
List of New York hurricanes was selected as one of the top WP:LOTDs for June and will be the LOTD twice during the month. Let me know before May 23rd if you have nay date preferences.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 01:53, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Gracie
The things in brackets are for disambiguation. "Deserving the main article" as a rule is something that makes sense in the case of new Katrina. However, when a storm name is used once and only once and is not on the current lists so will not be used again. Therefore Hurricane Gracie uniquely defines one storm. Therefore disambiguation is not necessary. Common sense trumps WPTC anyday. Think: If the "main article" redirects to an alternative with (brackets) and there is no possible confusion, there is no need for the redirect. Storms aren't people "they" don't deserve a thing.--CycloneAlley (talk) 02:02, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thats called being stupid. Try to remember: this is Wikipedia not WikiProject Tropical cyclones. Wikipedia-wide rules trump WikiProjects, like an king beats a three. The not-deserving-main-article-thing applies for storms on CURRENT lists. As Gracie is not there, why does it need to be bracketed? Tell me! Try to think and apply some common sense, instead of quoting WPTC guidelines.--CycloneAlley (talk) 02:13, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

OK take back the first sentence. Then read what I said and think before you reply, instead of saying "WPTC says A, so A is all that is allowed".--CycloneAlley (talk) 02:19, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Hurricane Gracie wasn't retired, what does that have to do with anything? A (year in brackets) is for disambiguation, not to say the storm is not "deserving" of the "main article". Tell me why non-retired storms need the year in the title? Oh if thats the case, how come Nargis, Gonu and Agni have their "main" articles? Those names are not and never will be retired either, so they should be at Cyclone Nargis (2008), Cyclone Gonu (2007), Cyclone Agni (2004) if this convention really was sensible.--CycloneAlley (talk) 02:32, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

How is this vandalism????
How does adding an approved placeholder image to a template constitute vandalism? the purpose of the image s to solicit the addition of properly licensed images to articles, which no one in there right mind couldf have objection to. _64.32.189.89 (talk) 03:09, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Help page reply
Can you reply at Help_desk--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 05:09, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Award Center Newsletter
-  Newsletter Bot   Talk  22:28, 23 May 2008 (UTC) The above newsletter was delivered by. If you would not like to receive this newsletter, please add your name here.

MFD note re: Talk:The weather in London
Following the original "keep" closure, a speedy deletion and reversion wheel 1, and a DRV; Talk:The weather in London is back at MFD again. If you are still interested in this page, please join in the discussion at: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:The weather in London 2. (Note: notice sent to all editors of the first MFD that have not already been come in the new MFD.) Thank you, —  xaosflux  Talk 23:39, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

WP:CSD
Hi Julian,

I just deleted a bunch of pages per your request, but I wanted to drop a quick note and let you know that there were some unintended consequences. Apparently, a number of the pages you requested be deleted have been transcluded on other pages, which means that by nominating these pages for deletion you also inadvertently added those other pages to CAT:USD. It's not a big problem, of course--nothing got deleted that shouldn't have been, and the category will sort itself out--but I thought I'd let you know that in the future, you might want to either avoid transcluding personal subpages (particularly into articles) or simply slap a pair of  tags around the CSD notice to prevent it from being transcluded. Thanks! -- jonny - m t  16:30, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Template problem
The speedy deletion of one of your user subpages has caused several users’ talk pages and/or archives to be listed for speedy deletion. You might want to take a look at this list and remove the offending links. Thanks — Travis talk  16:42, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

List of New England Patriots head coaches
Can I ask you to do a review of List of New England Patriots head coaches, as you have done to some of my other FLC's? Thanks again, «  Milk's Favorite Cøøkie  (  talk  /  contribs ) 18:20, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Done with this FLC. I didn't expand the lead with team history (as I already had the basics about the Bengals in the beginning). There wasn't much I could expand as they only had 9 coaches, I also took care of the red links. Thanks, «  Milk's Favorite  Cøøkie  20:34, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Deletion review for Template:FootnotesSmall
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Template:FootnotesSmall. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Rockfang (talk) 19:49, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Reformat of table in Andromeda Strain miniseries site instantly reverted
Dude, I edited a table of the cast of characters to remove an empty column and was instantly reverted. Are you running a 'bot, or do you like ugly formatting? 70.22.154.184 (talk) 18:10, 27 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Here's the diff. 70.22.154.184 (talk) 18:15, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Request for Peer Review help
Thank you for you work as a peer review volunteer. Since March, there has been a concerted effort to make sure all peer review requests get some response. Requests that have gone three days or longer without a substantial response are listed at Peer review/backlog. I have three requests to help this continue.

1) If you are asked to do a peer review, please ask the person who made the request to also do a review, preferably of a request that has not yet had feedback. This is fairly simple, but helps. For example when I review requests on the backlog list, I close with Hope this helps. If my comments are useful, please consider peer reviewing an article, especially one at Peer review/backlog (which is how I found this article). Yours, ...

2) While there are several people who help with the backlog, lately I have been doing up to 3 or 4 peer reviews a day and can not keep this up much longer. We need help. Since there are now well over 100 names on the PR volunteers page, if each volunteer reviewed just one PR request without a response from the list each month, it would easily take care of the "no response" backlog. To help spread out the load, I suggest those willing pick a day of the month and do a review that day (for example, my first edit was on the 8th, so I could pick the 8th). Please pick a peer review request with no responses yet, if possible off the backlog list. If you want, leave a note on my talk page as to which day you picked and I will remind you each month.

3) I have made some proposals to add some limits to peer review requests at Wikipedia_talk:Peer_review. The idea is to prevent any one user from overly burdening the process. These seem fairly reasonable (one PR request per editor per day, only four total PR requests per editor at a time, PR requests with cleanup banners can be delisted (like GAN quick fail), and wait two weeks to relist a PR request after it is archived), but have gotten no feedback in one week. If you have any thoughts on these, please weigh in.

Thanks again for your help and in advance for any assistance with the backlog. Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 21:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks so much for your review and the offer to help, they are both much appreciated.
 * Per your comment on the Cogan House Covered Bridge I wanted to mention that I find some of my obscure sources via the internet - although the two Lycoming County historical society journals are not online, their tables of contents are and I can search them fairly easily with Google (then go to libraries that have the issues). Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 01:03, 28 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I have also had some luck hunting through newspaper archives on microfilm when I know an approximate date (and so range) to look in. One library I use has an index to the local newpaper articles online too, although they miss things sometimes too. Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 01:51, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

NY 311 and other Putnam/Dutchess photos
Julian,

A while back you asked if I had any photos of NY 311. I didn't then, but I went out that way with my son last weekend and took a whole bunch (also see my additions to my suggested photos at Talk:New York State Route 22). Among them are the view looking north up the causeway over Lake Carmel from the junction, and a view down 52 heading into the junction showing the lake and causeway ... the last photo I really wanted for that article.

I also got one of downtown Patterson. It will be a while till I get them uploaded, but I've got them now. Daniel Case (talk) 18:12, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

They've answered our question
It looks like in the new GA review format, as many people as possible get to review the article, and the decision to pass it lies with the first reviewer. I'm imagining this will slow down the review process, but it does clarify things regarding multiple reviewers of an article. Thegreatdr (talk) 18:32, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of Cincinnati Bengals head coaches
...and ✅ (Sorry for the delay) «  Milk's Favorite  Cøøkie  20:08, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

thanks for the shiny!
OOOOO!! Pwetty wights!!! *stares* J.d ela noy gabs analyse  22:02, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
 * heh. Actually, I was eating supper and walking my dog, but don't tell anyone that.... *looks around nervously* J.d ela noy gabs analyse  22:06, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

GA subpage
Because GA nominations are now on a subpage, there's no way to access it after the bot archives it. I was able to fix the temporary Failed GA template, but when the bot archives it there's no way to go to the subpage again. Can this be fixed?  Limetolime  talk to me • look what I did! 00:19, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Track images
Just upload the new track over the. It keeps things organized. Thanks. - CWY2190    ( talk  •  contributions )  18:15, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * One more thing on Commons, don't put Category:2008 Pacific hurricane season on images. Use this one instead.  That way we have all of 01E images in one category and not hundreds of images from 20 storms all together. -  CWY2190    ( talk  •  contributions )  22:21, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I forgot you can't move the category. Hmm.  Next time we can wait until the storm is done, or the category could just be 01E. -  CWY2190    ( talk  •  contributions )  23:39, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Lists with small scopes
I've opened a discussion at WT:FLC regarding the Head coaches lists. Feel free to join in. Matthewedwards (talk· contribs· count· email) 08:21, 30 May 2008 (UTC)