User talk:Keilana/Archive8

Brainburst deletion
Was wondering about the deletion of the Brainburst entry. You wrote "Web content; doesn't indicate importance/significance." I am confused, as I thought the entry did exactly that. Unfortunately, I did not expect it to be deleted so quickly and I was not able to capture the source code (and if you could guide me to where I could get the source code so that I may take it to the Drawing Board forum, I would appreciate it).

Can you explain to me how it was not notable? I would like to know what I did wrong so that future entries can adhere to the wikipedia notability standards.

Thanks.

Drbing2000 (talk) 07:52, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Monobook Blank ASAP
Can you please blank my monobook? I cannot log in with RyRy5 if the codes are there. BTW, this is User:RyRyBot.--RyRy5 Talk to RyRy? 17:43, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Note on reversion
Just to let you know, your revision to Gareth Thomas (rugby player) reverted a vandalism revert (reintroducing the vandalism). AlexJ (talk) 15:12, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Migrated thread
Why did you just delete Love Systems? I was just going to put up the link to the Dr Phil show that everyone was asking for. I'm following the directions - get more notable references - and the page with Nick Savoy which had the exact same issue was just voted to be kept. Camera123456 (talk) 23:10, 6 April 2008 (UTC) (Transcribed by —Animum (talk) 00:32, 7 April 2008 (UTC))

April GA Newsletter
The April issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is now available. Dr. Cash (talk) 03:55, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Love Systems page
Thanks for responding on my talk page! It's great to see a polite admin :)

Anyway, I'm surprised you saw a consensus to delete on that page, but that's not really the point. People said they would switch if someone produced important 3rd party sources. In addition to CBS national radio and Fox News and Keys to the VIP, I had just found that morning that Love Systems is featured on April 11th on the Dr Phil show (an extremely well-known US TV show). I was about to add that to the record.

Is there any way to reopen the debate with that information? I'd hate to see all my work having gone to waste.

Best Camera123456 (talk) 23:29, 7 April 2008 (UTC)


 * SUBSEQUENT UPDATE (APRIL 10) ***

Thanks for your comments on my talk page. Yes, please restore the Love Systems page. I'd like to add the extra sources and then try again.

However, another situation happened - the Nick Savoy page was approved and then deleted. Even though even the "negative" posters agreed that it could be kept (see my talk page).

I worked really hard on these and I believe they are backed up by third party sources (The Dr Phil show, Keys to the VIP, CBS national, Fox Regional, The Globe and Mail, etc.)

Is there an admin I can work with to do this properly, without inviting abuse? :)

Camera123456 (talk) 20:27, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


 * THANKS ***

Thanks for restoring the article. Were you able to restore both? And how do I get to where they are? Final question (and I'm truly grateful for your patience) - there's an admin who just has it in for anythign I write and has repeatedly accused me of being or operating a dozen or so sock puppets without evidence...is there a procedure to work with a (different) admin to try to respectfully build a page and avoid one admin's vendetta? (I'm not the only one he's targetted; his talk page is full of people complaining about him). I'm newish here and he's just been ambushing me. Camera123456 (talk) 23:11, 9 April 2008 (UTC)


 * REPLY ***

Yes, please if I could have both pages so I can repost them when that admin stops stalking me and accusing me of being everyone's sock puppet. That admin is Rhaworth - check out his talk page (and mine). I don't know if he has a political agenda (the topic is very political) but it feels like it. I don't want to change wikipedia rules I just want to be able to operate fairly and without being stalked. IS there anything I can do or anyone I can appeal to? Or is it a king-of-the-hill kind of thing and I just have to wait until he gets bored? Camera123456 (talk) 20:46, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Review request for History of timekeeping devices
Sorry, I'm afraid I'm currently too busy to take on any more review requests at this time. Good luck with the article, though! – Scartol  •  Tok  01:13, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

GA Nomination for Harry Potter
Hi there!

Just to let you know that I have nominated Harry Potter for GA, and it is currently being reviewed. For more information on the review, please see Talk:Harry_Potter.

Thanks,

The  Helpful   One  (Review) 16:31, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks again (better late than never)
Hey Keilana, I want to thank you again for taking the time to admin coach me, it really helped me gain my confidence back with the tools. If you ever need my assistance please let me know, and I'll try my best to help. With my kindest regards. Knowledge Of Self &#124;  talk  00:35, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh my! I haven't done peer review in a long long time, but I'll take a look at it. :) Knowledge Of Self  &#124;  talk  00:41, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Clarification
Although your deletion of the cabals was what I refer to as a "stupid" action considering it was not only against policy but a just set consensus, my proposal isn't just about that incident. It's about all such incidents, I just cited the most recent two.  Lara  ❤  Love  00:17, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Prem Rawat protection
Hi, you protected Prem Rawat article, but did not place the appropriate tag. Please do so. Mukadderat (talk) 17:35, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

RFA thanks
Thanks for your support in my RFA, that didn't quite make it and ended at 120/47/13. There was a ton of great advice there, that I'm going to go on. Maybe someday. If not, there are articles to write! Thanks for your support. Lawrence §  t / e  17:42, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Chaps mediation
Just an FYI that I have weighed in, finally. You may want to touch bases over there before we all start just spatting again, and let us know if you want additional information, etc.  Montanabw (talk) 04:30, 13 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Can you weigh in on our current mediation? Thanks  Montanabw (talk) 22:17, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Keilana, we appear to have a consensus or at least a majority vote, except the filing party has been offline since the 21st without comment, and the other party who hasn't polled on the issue is going to be offline indefinitely per her talk page. So to finalize and close this mediation, how long to we wait if some people do not weigh in in a timely fashion? Just wondering.   Montanabw (talk) 19:40, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Could you have a look at this by any chance?
I was speaking to my admin coach, User:MBisanz, about having an article I'm improving rated. He recommended you, but I don't want to bother you too much. But, if you could, would you be able to have a look at the Martha Logan article, and rate it? If it's not too much trouble. I'd really appreciate it. :) Steve Crossin (talk) (anon talk) 08:16, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

RFA Thanks
Thank you for your comments on my RFA. Even though it failed with 28 supports, 42 opposes, and 15 neutrals, I am grateful for the suggestions and advice I have received and I do hope to improve as a Wikipedian. If you ever need my help in any endeavor, feel free to drop me a line. -- Shark face  217  19:48, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your help with the Simon Amstell page


Rachel Summers (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Rachel Summers (talk) 22:23, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

My RfA...
 Thank you... ...for your participation in my RFA, which closed with 85 supports, 2 neutrals and 1 oppose. I'm extremely grateful for all the the kind comments from so many brilliant Wikipedians I've come to respect and admire, as well as many others I've not yet had the pleasure of working with, and I'll do my best to put my shiny new mop and bucket to good use! Once again, thank you. "Absolute support"... I don't know what to say ;) EyeSerene talk 16:31, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Hey, I finally had my talk page vandalized, and you fixed it for me, I appreciate that.Dbrodbeck (talk) 12:12, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Deleted Cabals
Could you add User:ComputerGuy890100/Cabals to the list? — ComputerGuy890100  Talk to meWhat I've done to help Wikipedia 23:32, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. — ComputerGuy890100  Talk to meWhat I've done to help Wikipedia 23:45, 16 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I have closed the DRV. No consensus was found to endorse your deletions, and you are so informed - this was not a particularly good application of WP:IAR.  However, there is also not a consensus to restore the pages.  To the extent there is a consensus, it is a consensus to use individual judgment.  I've laid out in the DRV closure the path by which individual judgment is to be applied for this set of pages.  GRBerry 15:05, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

August 20
Thanks for deleting the latest attempt to add this new Birth. I undid two attempts yesterday by this user (from IP address 74.56.89.213) and put a comment on the user's talk page indicating that he would continue to be deleted. Not sure what we do from here. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 00:25, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for being willing to deal with vandals so quickly! Jsmith86 (talk) 00:30, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 7th and 14th, 2008.
Sorry, it seems that the bot quit before completing its run last week. Here is the last two weeks' worth of Signpost. Ralbot (talk) 08:28, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:28, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Colin Belyea
Well done catching the vandalism on the "Ban" article - Colin Belyea is impressed!

Shall we be rivals? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.34.187.17 (talk) 03:14, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

vandalism on my talk page
thank you kindly-- Pewwer42  Talk 03:24, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * for the deletion of it, that is-- Pewwer42  Talk 03:25, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Your new best friend!
Oh look, how nice. Cant you just feel the love? Tiptoety talk 03:27, 18 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I smell a previous cabal operator out for revenge. Equazcion •✗/C • 03:28, 18 Apr 2008 (UTC)
 * Yay. He's wrong about one thing, that block button is mighty handy... Equazcion, he's this vandal I've been reverting lately, I doubt anyone's connected to the cabal people. Keilana | Parlez ici 03:31, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah. Equazcion •✗/C • 03:31, 18 Apr 2008 (UTC)


 * I didn't even know you could make that symbol in text....who wrote the Alt codes?(they should be fired)-- Pewwer42  Talk 03:34, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I was wondering about those too. Rather strange that that'd be included in web fonts. I can't imagine why anyone would ever need it as a typable character, aside from uses such as this. Equazcion •✗/C • 03:43, 18 Apr 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not exactly sure a use like this is "needed" maybe they made it so people could write WWII scripts for movies or plays?-- Pewwer42 <font style="color:#089852;background:#0000ff;"> Talk 03:47, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Heh, nice one Keilana. Maybe you'll have a list like mine. :) Acalamari 19:14, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Grove Park
Hi, why have you removed the image I have added to Grove Park railway station? It shows the station, and I had it to the correct size to fit on the page (after adding the 300px thing, which I forgot.)

Please feel free to add it back if you decide it is actually suitable.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Grove_Park_railway_station&oldid=206885678

cheers, Dan Llamafish (talk) 14:17, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

History of timekeeping devices
I finally got around to doing a peer review of history of timekeeping devices. I posted it here. I hope it is helpful! Awadewit (talk) 17:13, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

RE: Grove Park
Thanks for that!

I thought there was nothing wrong with it, but you never know!

You probably reverted it just as I was correcting the 300px thing, so it was missed

cheers,

Dan

Llamafish (talk) 10:11, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 17:00, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for putting up the 24 hour block due to 163.153.27.216's recent edits. This address is NAT'd and the edits came from multiple students. The district reports that they have identified the class that it came from and that the teacher is being notified of this improper use. --NERIC-Security (talk) 16:47, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Your judgement please
I would like to ask for your judgement on this vandalism-only IP. The user has made several disruptive edits, one of which I cought targeting a school. See my diff. The IP doesn't seem to like one particular subject, juding from a quick look at the telltale contribs log. Also the user has had several warnings on their page. Your call. -- Gp 75 motorsports  <sup style="color:#800000;">REV LIMITER  11:02, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Alright, thanks. -- Gp 75 motorsports  <sup style="color:#800000;">REV LIMITER  16:20, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

talk page history
Not sure if you meant to do this, but you've just removed the entire history of your talk page. While you do have talk archives, sometimes people use diffs when referring to specific comments, and it also removes a level of verifiability when it comes to the accuracy of the comments. -- Ned Scott 04:44, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Not that I'm complaining or feel strongly about it. To be honest I'm not even sure why your talk page triggered my watch list. I also see you have a RTV note on the top of the page, and if this is related to that, I apologies. -- Ned Scott 04:56, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles May Newsletter
The May Newsletter for WikiProject Good Articles has now been published. Dr. Cash (talk) 22:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Possible edit war
Evidence: Diff 210712656 Users:Goruyella and Strongsauce (and, to a lesser extent, an IP) appear to be dangerously close to warring over the content of the "Releases" section of Metal Gear Solid 4. Sorry to bother you again, Metros is off and Daniel is likely busy with a few other things at the moment. Thanks. -- Gp 75 motorsports  <sup style="color:#800000;">REV LIMITER  11:01, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Right to vanish.
From my understanding of Right to vanish this is a right extended to users that elect to exercise their right to leave. Ie. since you are still active you should not be allowed to disassociate yourself from your previous edits. Taemyr (talk) 02:36, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * All of her edits are still there in her history. She has merely vanished from her older name to her current name.  She has not disassociated herself with any former activities.  MBisanz  talk 03:06, 8 May 2008 (UTC)