User talk:Mohammad adil

Please leave your messages here...

Awesome maps!
Do you have the original shapefiles? Would love to see on mapstory.org Emmoel02 (talk) 17:56, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Excellent maps but their scale is off.
It is about fifty miles from the Mediterranean to the Dead Sea, and about three-hundred and forty from Alexandria to the Turkish coast.66.227.183.147 (talk) 16:33, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Excellent maps of early Islamic campaigns
What it says. This information isn't easy to find in map form, and I own dozens of historical atlases. Thanks, Mohammed Adil :)

A.O.A Adil Bhai
I have done some work on Battle of Jalula but its only 70% complete.I was thinking that u should take a look of it,it seems incomplete waiting for your reply.......MOHKUM

A.o.A again Bhai,i have been doing some paper work regarding Jalula and have come down to the assumption that it was not a key battle rather than it was the destruction of remaining elements from Qadisiya and the troops that were in the Persian capital and had retreated to the strategically important junction of jalula in last desperate effort to halt Muslim advance,as jalula was like a bottle neck to Northern Persia.That is why i thought that there is no need to give a detailed background for this battle i.e from Abubakr(RA) to Jalula rather i think i should start directly after Qadisiya as the article written on Qadisiya gives such a perfect scenario of both the politics & weapons of both the sides.So i think we should start the article by explaining the importance of Jalula and then the maneuvers and stuff.I have downloaded inkscape and InshaALlah will start to draw maps in no time.I have also done some paper work on Nihawand but as my send-up exams are just around the corner i wont be able to get on the net.But i will work on it on paper.I will try to contribute as per my ability.One thing more i think we should also try to write about Hazrat Zarrar Bin Al-Azwar and Qaqa Bin Amr (may Allah be please with both of them)as they were foremost Cavalry commanders for the Muslims.My regards and though its late but Happy Eid.MOHKUM

A.o.A bhai......i have written a rough manuscript about battle of Jalula just wanted u to take a look so that u can point out whats missing.I will draw the maps within a weak or so.I just wanted u to do me a favor and draw a map showing strategical importance of Jalula.my regards againMOHKUM--MOHKUM SHABBIR (talk) 13:08, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

--MOHKUM SHABBIR (talk) 13:22, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohkum Shabbir (talk • contribs) 18:16, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

a.o.a bhai i hope ur cool.I did fine in my exams and guess what i'm back so please lets start our work again on Jalula waitin' for ur reply--MOHKUM SHABBIR (talk) 16:45, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

A.o.A bhai,just wanted to thank u for the help,support and guidelines u have given me,may Allah give the ample reward for it and again my heartiest gratitude for your help .........Jalula could not have possibly completed without your assistance.But bad news for you is that i aint gonna stop writing bad articles and good news for me is that you would always be there for converting bad articles into good ones!!!!!!.Ok on a more serious note so any future work for me that you have in ur mind.Waitin' 4 ur reply --MOHKUM SHABBIR (talk) 09:54, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Assalamaalaikum bhai........yeah i know its been a long time but im back....i was wondering that whether you are still interested in nihawand cause i'd start writing the manuscript for it......as my BOARD examinations are over so i thought lets start some healthy activity................one thing more i was hoping that we both start to write something about wars of 65,71 or 99 conflict with India because the articles covering these wars are biased.....so please let me know --MOHKUM SHABBIR (talk) 07:00, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Ok back again.......I am very glad to tell you that with Allah's help and mercy i have been selected for PMA Kakul for 126 PMA long course...so that can explain my absence..........now i am actaully FREE as my childhood ambition has been fulfilled please give me a task on which Battle should i start to write?

--MOHKUM SHABBIR (talk) 18:23, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Assalamoliakum Bhai.....I have just got my hand onto a good article about Battle of Nihawand ........please makie me another sand box for Nihawand.....i will try my best to write Nihawand as i tried with Jalula....My regards and yes thank you for considering me a "Warrior" Inshallah i wont let this claim of yours down......ok Allah Hafiz and please make me another sandbox apart from Jalula......waitng for your reply MOHKUM --MOHKUM SHABBIR (talk) 11:18, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVI (December 2009)
The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:59, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Quick question in re: signatures
I've noticed alot on user pages that some wikipedians have alternate formatting on their signatures, Curiously. I'm not sure whether this is a simple inline edit with HTML or a more complex procedure. Is it simply a string that users have copied to their clipboard and use to sign posts? Thanks! Oh and I'll give it a shot here.  &brvbar;petiatil &raquo;speak &brvbar; 08:19, 3 January, 2010 (UTC)

Battle of yarmouk (french page): Request for information
On the French page something is mentioned about the Ghassanides, the Christian Arabs. It is written there that the Ghassanides defected to the Muslim side because they hadn't received payment for several months and the Muslims promised to pay their salaries. No source is mentioned. Do you know something about this? Wereldburger758 (talk) 15:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Btw, the copy-edit of the page of Khalid ibn Walid will have to wait. I am now copy-editing the Rashidun conquest of Persia. Wereldburger758 (talk) 15:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. warrior 4321  03:56, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Pakistan
Why did you change it to say they drive on the right? This is incorrect. Fences &amp;  Windows  01:26, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

nb the field "Drives on the ..." in the infobox refers to which side of the road the car drives on, not which side of the car the driver sits. pablo hablo. 11:44, 10 January 2010 (UTC)


 * More discussion at User talk:Fences and windows.  pablo hablo. 12:18, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Karachi
Salam, I have started a WikiProject to improve Karachi-related articles, if you are interested in contributing to the content then visit the project here, thanks. Taqi Haider (talk) 14:35, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

help

 * i am nominating Battle of Yarmouk for military history A-class assessment second time, i am done with 2 steps mentioned there i.e moving the previous nomination page to archive1 and then updating the link for the last review on articlehistory on battle of yarmouk's talk page.
 * But i am not getting the 3rd step, i tried every possible thing but cant really get how to update transclusion in the relevant assessment archive page.
 * wht is that in the relevant assessment archive page is ? and how to update it ?
 * 3rd step as mentioned on the a class assesment page is as follow...


 * 3- Update the transclusion in the relevant assessment archive page, found by using the "What Links Here" feature.
 * all the steps are here.

الله أكبر Mohammad Adil  21:42, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * This issue has been fixed. You can go ahead and replace the redirect at WikiProject_Military_history/Assessment/Battle of Yarmouk with your new nomination verbiage. I'll follow-up and fix any formatting issues. -MBK004 21:55, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. ''You made three edits in the same minute! Use the preview button.'' warrior  4321  23:42, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Byzantine-Sassanid War of 602-628
Thanks for your comments and for the barnstar. Looking at your profile, it seems that you make maps. If you have access to the book, would it be possible for you to create the maps in Walter Kaegi's Heraclius Emperor of Byzantium that are relevant to my article? For reference they are on pgs. 20, 66, 123, 157, 164, 193. I only ask because I personally have no idea how to make those high quality graphics. Thanks. DemonicInfluence (talk) 18:28, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for volunteering to help. I do have access to the Kaegi book. If you could tell me your email or something, I could send you scanned pages of the necessary maps. Thanks. DemonicInfluence (talk) 20:20, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I have sent you the email with the maps I mentioned. Sorry for the offensive name I picked, those were my from my younger days. Thanks for helping me on this project. If any of the images are unclear, please ask me. I won't respond to the email I sent the images from. DemonicInfluence (talk) 03:28, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the update and the new shiny map :) I appreciate your efforts. DemonicInfluence (talk) 00:34, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 * In both of the new maps, you have a typo. The legend should say "Slav immigration and Avar attacks" not "Slav immigration and Avae attacks"  DemonicInfluence (talk) 16:38, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Pakistan peer review
Thanks for your note - glad to know my comments are useful. I would be glad to look at it again - why don't you work on it and when you feel it is ready for a second look, let me know and I can make more comments then, Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 15:56, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Your autoreviewer request
Hi, just wanted to let you know that I have granted autoreviewer rights on your account, as you have created numerous valid articles. This will have little or no effect on your editing, and is intended mainly to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information see Autoreviewer, and feel free to ask if you have any questions.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 14:08, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Which one?
Which was the battle in which Khalid Ibn Walid stopped fighting to pick up his helmet which contained Muhammad's strand of hair? Please reply over here, and place a talkback on my talk page. warrior 4321  04:53, 18 January 2010 (UTC)


 * It was Battle of Yarmouk. الله أكبر Mohammad Adil  08:21, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
warrior 4321  19:38, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)
The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:16, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

A-Class reviews
All three of your open A-Class reviews at the Military history WikiProject have been closed as unsuccessful because they have been open for 28+ days and do not have sufficent consensus for promotion. In the future, please do not nominate more than one article at a time to the ACR process so you can adequately devote time to satisfy the reviewer's comments as well as not strain the system for the reviewers. Also, before re-nominating these articles, the issues brought forward need to be fixed. For the Coordinators of the Military history WikiProject, -MBK004 03:50, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Pakistan
I have just completed a review of this article. It's quite close to meeting GA criteria, though some issues remain. See the review here. WTF? (talk) 18:51, 13 February 2010 (UTC)


 * How is progress coming along with this GA? It's been on hold for about two weeks now. Thanks! WTF? (talk) 16:13, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Battle of Yarmouk
Hey there Mohammad!

I'm considering reviewing the Battle of Yarmouk for GA. First though I'll read the article, possibly copy-edit, then present a normal review or a GA one. I'm a little hesitant to do the latter, because I've only done one GA review before. Thought I'd let you know. --Sherif9282 (talk) 18:08, 14 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Here it is mentioned that Emessa was captured by Khalid in 637 CE, although the Battle of Yarmouk states Khalid had been replaced by Ubaidah. Was Ubaidah instated as a superior commander to Khalid for example? --Sherif9282 (talk) 15:48, 16 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Then it should be mentioned in the article; somewhere along the lines of: Khalid was replaced by Ubaidah as overall commander, although the former still functioned as field commander. --Sherif9282 (talk) 16:17, 16 February 2010 (UTC)


 * In the Prelude section, it is stated Though previous campaigns led by Khalid were successful, he was replaced by Abu Ubaidah. No mention is made of Khalid being retained as a commander. Currently it is implied that Khalid was removed from command altogether. --Sherif9282 (talk) 16:23, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Yes it is mentioned in the section on the Rashidun Army, although it does not mention when. I think it is more appropriate and better for the reader if that piece of information is mentioned in the Prelude, since that section deals with with the capture of Emessa. --Sherif9282 (talk) 17:39, 16 February 2010 (UTC)


 * You know what, if you'd like to implement any changes please do so. I think I'll take note of any issues with the article and present them all at once during the review. (if I will make a review; don't hang any expectations on me!) Regards. --Sherif9282 (talk) 21:15, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

The article makes mention of one Jabla. Is this one and the same as Jabalah ibn al-Aiham? If not, you should clarify who this other Jabla is, and what role did he play in the battle. --Sherif9282 (talk) 15:29, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Alright... There is also mention of Jabalah ibn Abi Laham. Same person as well? BTW I've copy-edited up to day 1 of the battle; I've shaved around 1,500 bytes from the article. Tell me what you think when you have time. --Sherif9282 (talk) 17:04, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:03, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Quetta
I see that you presented yourself as an Urdu-speaker on your personal page (perhaps you're a Punjabi). You blindly reverted my NPOV edits, please do not start edit-war with me. I provided sources to my edits so please try not to revert again without a discussion. I'm Pashtun originally from the Quetta area that's the reason I got involved with editing that article. The article lacks sources, it will be a good idea to source everything. Your version has ridiculous claims like "According to non-government sources the population along with Afghan immigrants is between 14,00000-16,00000" and there is no reliable source provided for this. All the sources are junks and that's why I removed them.--119.73.11.106 (talk) 21:25, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)
The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:56, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

GA article... Mabrouk!
Congrats on getting the Battle of Yarmouk to GA class. This is an important article and I commend your efforts. I was supposed to continue on the copy-editing, but life has been crazy recently. Should I find the time, I'll get back to it. Good luck and all the best :) Sherif9282 (talk) 09:28, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Monument of battle of yarmouk-mohammad adil.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Monument of battle of yarmouk-mohammad adil.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. , and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
 * state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
 * add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 14:29, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Byzantine flag
Hello Mohammad! I removed that flag from several articles, because it is not really the "Flag of the Byzantine Empire": the double-headed eagle was not used as an emblem until the 11th century (and is securely attested only after ca. 1320), in addition it was never featured in flags (as far as we know) but only on clothes etc, and never used on a yellow background but always deep red/purple. This flag is a modern design (late 19th century) connected with the rise of Greek nationalism and irredentism. It is the current flag of the Greek Orthodox Church, but in no way is it a true Byzantine design, despite what many people think. I have written on the issue in Byzantine heraldry article. In short, the only truly attested Byzantine flag is this. Best regards, Constantine  ✍  16:16, 18 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Well, the short answer is, there was no "Byzantine flag" in the 7th century, at least not in the sense we speak of flags today. Byzantium used a variety of banners and signa, but no single design was used as a "national" flag. If you want a representative symbol, I'd suggest using a Chi-Rho (for example this or this). Constantine  ✍  14:05, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Coordinator elections have opened!
Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:07, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Siege of Jerusalem (637)
Hi, as per your request at the Guild of Copy Editors, I have copy edited this article for you. I would appreciate any feedback you may have. Thanks. -- S Masters (talk) 03:53, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Reply
I left a message for you at the milhist talk page concerning your request for an outside opinion. I hope it helps. TomStar81 (Talk) 01:43, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)
The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:16, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Battle of Mu'ta
Salam alaykoum akhy wa barakallahou fik for all your articles macha allah. I contribute for WP essentially in french but in english i try to etablish the links between the articles in arabic and english. I would like to ask if u can to search a picture for ghazwatu Mu'ta like this 'Plan of Mu'ta in arabic' or if you find better than this. Wa 'alaykoum salam akhy. — Skandar  blabla 13:47, 22 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Asalamualikum...


 * i didnt get you, do you want a picture of battlefield of mutah or do you want a map that shows location of that battlefield according to present day geography.


 * Regards الله أكبر  Mohammad Adil  16:55, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Salam alaykoum, the both if u can but it's not urgent. Salam :) — Skandar  blabla 22:34, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)
The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:46, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Battle of Yarmouk Sources
!السلام عليكم Just wanted to comment directly to you, Mohammad, as you seem to have a clear dedication to the Battle of Yarmouk page. I am not trying to trample on the great work that has been done there, I'm just trying to suggest that there are some definite issues with some of the sources relied upon. I believe that the Islamic sources that make up the overall conquest narrative should definitely be included as the basis of the article, I'm just hesitant to rely so heavily on al-Tabari. Specifically, it's that we know for a fact that at least SOME of his reports regarding the battle are fabricated by the very fact that he presents such a wrong date for it.

I hope that the summer months will give me some of an opportunity to work on the article myself rather than just make suggestions, but the graduate life is an arduous one (as you may or may not be able to relate!). Riskbreaker2987 (talk) 23:50, 11 May 2010 (UTC)


 * I disagree with you, Mohammad, because of the sources that are used; namely Akram, who relies heavily on al-Tabari (even though, for the record, his citations are AWFUL. They definitely show the date in which he was writing). There is also more than just "a page" that exists within al-Tabari's Tarikh, but I'm certainly not interested in arguing symantecs. In looking at the references, though, almost all of the citations are from modern sources (especially Akram), some of which are of debatable scholarship. I'm just trying to urge awareness that the narrative isn't at all clear on details as the works of Akram and Nicolle suggest they are.


 * Again, thank you for the dialogue, though. On another note, is there a reason that Ibn Ishaq is listed? I asked that originally, and never got a response.


 * Lastly, regarding the link that you posted on the talk page, I'd like to mention that the author of that book, Robert Hoyland, is actually my Ph.D. supervisor. ;-) Riskbreaker2987 (talk) 17:52, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Re: Battle of Yarmouk
The discussion we had actually agreed on the low quality of the article and a special focus on the misrepresentation of the number of forces involved. Agreement was reached in favour of the opinion numbers given were too high, only your tireless reverting back of edits by others has made that your one-sided view of the battle has persisted.

You have clearly shown to lack understanding of historical research, but your antisocial behaviour has caused you to gain the upper hand, editing endlessly while others did not have as much time as you did. I currently have no time to make wikipedia articles and edits, yet every once in a while I hope to revive discussion on the Yarmouk and related pages and get a decent article started.

Sadly you consider yourself the owner of the Yarmouk article and will remove any edits out of line of your fantastic ideas on what happened at Yarmouk. That's how it has been for a couple of years now. Wiki1609 (talk) 22:51, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Morning view of Quetta-mohammad adil rais.JPG
A tag has been placed on File:Morning view of Quetta-mohammad adil rais.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tim 1357  talk  00:11, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Battle of Lahore
Another user expressed concern with some of your edits regarding this article and I'm curious why you consider this battle in particular to be a Pakistani Military Victory. For one, the provided citations (namely and ) indicate that Pakistan was decisively defeated in this war and that "Indian forces outfought their Pakistani counterparts and halted their attack on the outskirts of Lahore". The source does not claim that Pakistani forces repelled the Indian attack but instead it claims that by the time the United Nations intervened on September 22nd, Pakistan had suffered a clear defeat. I feel that the claims made by the Pakistani military are irrelevant and do not come from a neutral source. As such, I just wanted to let you know that I am modifying this article.

Thanks, Vedant (talk) 23:33, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)
The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:28, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mohammad adil/infobox caliph
Template:Mohammad adil/infobox caliph has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:37, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Umar
Hi, as the editor to have introduced the quotes in this article, could you comment on the changes made now please. Thanks. → AA (talk) — 16:48, 29 June 2010 (UTC) Note:, → AA (talk) — 16:55, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:23, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Mohammad adil-Rashidun-empire-at-its-peak-close.PNG
Thank you for uploading File:Mohammad adil-Rashidun-empire-at-its-peak-close.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:07, 25 July 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:07, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Pakistan
I recently came across your edits on Pakistan, and all those edits of your are literally pointless and is to be considered vandalism, if you cannot play a positive part in further improving the article, please do not remove key edits of other users. And don't edit just for the sake of increasing your edit counts. Pakistan article needs more elaboration instead of removal of sections and lame edits. Please refrain from such edits, repeated vandalism will put your account in jeopardy. Regards! SyedMANaqvi (talk) 15:22, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIII (July 2010)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:43, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Khalid ibn al-Walid
I reverted your reversion of the correction of a number of mistakes in English grammar and other edits by a number of editors. Unless an English grammar error was made originally by a source and is being reproduced, anyone can correct it. If there was something in the whole set of changes you reverted along with the grammar errors, then there's a process where you can work that out with the other editors. 72.228.177.92 (talk) 16:43, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

The Milhist election has started!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies  talk 19:24, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Battle of Phillora‎ has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. --UplinkAnsh (talk) 11:00, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Battle of Phillora. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.--UplinkAnsh (talk) 18:53, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Umar article
Hello. Can you explain about your edit here along with your edit summery? I see it as Vandalism. --Aliwiki (talk) 10:54, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:30, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Military of Albania
I am working on the article about the Military of Albania and it's service branches. Could you please help me with it? The current article is not correct and has a lot of working points. For the branches see this File:Albania Military Forces.png file. Please consider helping me! --Vinie007 16:34, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:56, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Campaignbox Wars of Abu Ubaidah ibn al-Jarrah
Template:Campaignbox Wars of Abu Ubaidah ibn al-Jarrah has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 15:45, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Mohammad adil/sandbox
User:Mohammad adil/sandbox, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mohammad adil/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Mohammad adil/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 16:44, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Help for
Adil Brother, I have seen a help request on the discussion page of Chiltan Adventurers Association Balochistanfor reducing of the size of "Certificate JPG PIC" if you please help them for,Ali Mohammad Khilji (talk) 23:17, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 16:20, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:21, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 04:14, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:11, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011
To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:09, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:34, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Greetings
Are you still around bro ?! You have not edited anything for a long time. Unflavoured (talk) 04:39, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok bro, good luck in your job. If you decide to go active again, please let me know so we can collaborate. Take care and good luck !! Unflavoured (talk) 03:21, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:41, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 18:23, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 02:32, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 08:30, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Move picture to wikimedia commons
Salam 'alaykoum. Can u move on wikimedia commons ? I can't use it form france for the same article. Barakallahou fik. wa salam 'alaykoum — Skandar  blabla 03:47, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:52, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Editing Help
Hi Adil bahi, I have a problem that when I have to edit something in any page the text has been disappeared automatically, please help me why this is happening to e,--Ali Baba (talk) 21:34, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Military Historian of the Year
Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:50, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.

The Bugle: Issue LXX, January 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:24, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXI, February 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 10:12, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Pakistan FAC
I guess you were attempting the article to be promoted to FA, appreciate the attempts. We've put it up again at FAC. :) -- lTopGunl (talk) 16:48, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXII, March 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 02:26, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXIII, April 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:26, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXIV, May 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 15:04, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

GOCE July 2012 Copy Edit Drive
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 19:14, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXVI, July 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 09:37, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXVII, August 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 01:04, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Military history coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 09:32, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXVIII, September 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project and/or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:50, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXIX, October 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Nick-D (talk) and Ian Rose (talk) 02:49, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Join us at FB
Hello Pakistanis Wikipedians! Assalam-o-Alaikum, I hope you are enjoying editing Wikipedia and helping around. I want to join every Pakistani Wikipedian on facebook so I hope you would like to join us in our community. We would/could help each other and make Pakistani articles more better.

Join us:
 * Group: Pakistani Wikipedians
 * Page: Pakistani Wikipedians

And then sign my guestbook for memories.

Regards: --  Captain Wikipedia!     ( <font color=Green>T - <font color=Green>C  - <font color=Green>G  ) 06:45, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXX, November 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:47, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXI, December 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:28, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXII, January 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIII, February 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:11, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIV, March 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:44, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Happy Birthday
Belated Happy Birthday Brother from a fan in India — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.202.208.112 (talk) 16:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXV, April 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 16:06, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVI, May 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:00, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVII, June 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:38, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVIII, July 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 16:15, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIX, August 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:52, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill [talk] 17:23, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXXX, September 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:50, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCI, October 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:35, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCII, November 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 06:45, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCIII, December 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:37, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Jalida for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jalida is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jalida until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Whpq (talk) 00:19, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCIV, January 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:49, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Abbasid caliphate
Hello, Can you please explain why the empire shown in your image at 655 AD http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mohammad_adil-Rashidun_empire-slide.gif is larger than the one in this other image at 661 AD http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Map_of_expansion_of_Caliphate.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.217.79.234 (talk) 20:05, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox caliph
Template:Infobox caliph has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:46, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCV, February 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:56, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCVI, March 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:38, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCVII, April 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:59, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCVIII, May 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:49, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments - Pakistan
<div style="background-image: linear-gradient(to right, #F5F5DC, #A9BA9D); border:1px solid #D1E231; border-radius: 25px; padding: 20px; margin: 0px; box-shadow: 0.2em 0.2em 0.3em rgba(0,0,0,0.5);">

'''Hi !

Wiki Loves Monuments, the world's largest photography competition, will be taking place in Pakistan this September. The competition is all about capturing the cultural monuments and heritage sites of Pakistan and uploading these images on Commons to create an online repository which will be freely available to all.

Start taking photos of the sites enlisted here and upload them in September to be eligible for national and international prizes.

Email: contact@wikilovesmonuments.pk Official website: wikilovesmonuments.pk Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WikiLovesMonumentsPK Posted by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:10, 8 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Pakistan

The Bugle: Issue XCIX, June 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:40, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Pakistani Cultural Heritage - Edit Drive
Hi !

Wikimedia Community User Group Pakistan is organizing an edit drive for Pakistani Wikipedians on Pakistani Cultural Heritage throughout the month of July. Top three contributors will be given a gift pack containing Wikipedia merchandise.

You can read the event details here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 July 2014 (UTC) You are receiving this message as a member of WikiProject Pakistan

The Bugle: Issue C, July 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:47, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CI, August 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:23, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CII, September 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 02:24, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:32, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014, Redux
NOTE: This replaces the earlier October 2014 Bugle message, which had incorrect links -- please ignore/delete the previous message. Thank uou! The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:52, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CIV, November 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:27, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!
The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!
The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open!
Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators,

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CV, December 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:51, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CVI, January 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:27, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CVII, February 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:50, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Pardon me : Mohammad adil-Rashidun empire-slide
Mohammad adil-Rashidun empire-slide This map can not possibly be the entire truth. People walk and journey to mountain the mountain ranges. All of Spain, Portugal, and Italy preferred Mohammedian's understandings of how to live in peace. Then Vaticanus Hill changed what its texts said and started making missionary journeys for poisons and methods to defeat what the considered a plague on their confidence artist game to defraud the people with a 3 year tithe instead of a 20 year tithe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.196.192.234 (talk) 18:09, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CVIII, March 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:36, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CIX, April 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 06:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CX, May 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:24, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXI, June 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXII, July 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:34, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXIII, August 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:46, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXIV, September 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:09, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXV, October 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:46, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXVI, November 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!
On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:06, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXVII, December 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXVIII, January 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:23, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXIX, February 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXX, March 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Siege of Ctesiphon (637)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Siege of Ctesiphon (637), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from Masudul Hasan (1997), Hadrat Umar Farooq: Allahʻs Blessings be Upon Him, https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=59jjAAAAMAAJ, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Siege of Ctesiphon (637) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Siege of Ctesiphon (637), in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Siege of Ctesiphon (637). See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Siege of Ctesiphon (637) with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Siege of Ctesiphon (637) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:03, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXI, April 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXII, May–June 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:05, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXIII, July 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:44, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXIV, August 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:58, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXV, September 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:27, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election
Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXVI, October 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:18, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXVII, November 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:30, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXVIII, December 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!
Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

The Bugle: Issue CXXIX, January 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXX, February 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

March Madness 2017
G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:


 * tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
 * updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
 * creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXI, March 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:20, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXII, April 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:50, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Excellent map work re Khalid's Invasion of Iraq - Two questions...
Mohammad -

I really like your maps. I have been doing research on the Battle of the River and have been trying to pinpoint where that battle may have occurred. I have read Khalid Bin Al-waleed: Sword of Allah but remain unclear. I have two questions for you if you would be so kind: 1) Where is the ancient city of Mazar located? Akram speaks of Mazar and refers to it in his time as Azeir. I cannot find any modern remnant if either. Can you provide any incite? 2) Can you provide and incite on the location of the Battle of the River?

Thank you for your assistance. I am VFF0347 (talk) 18:35, 2 May 2017 (UTC)VFF0347


 * I have been trying to pinpoint the location of the Battle of the River. My primary reference has been Akram's Khalid Bin Al-waleed: Sword of Allah. Can you provide any incite to the modern day location of the city of Mazar (Azeir) and/or the modern day location of the Battle of the River? Thanks so much! I am --VFF0347 (talk) 18:47, 2 May 2017 (UTC)VFF0347

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIII, May 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:02, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIV, June 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:52, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXV, July 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:34, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVI, August 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:38, 7 August 2017 (UTC)


 * I have unsubscribed you from the above list. – Fayenatic  L ondon 22:03, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Ridda Wars
This section, added by you in 2009, has been removed from the Ridda Wars article, section on campaign of apostasy. Do you know the original source?

Apart from their specific objectives, the corps commanders were given the following instructions: +	 	+	a. Seek the tribes which are your objectives +	b. Call the Azaan. +	c. If the tribe answers with the Azaan, do not attack. After the Azaan, ask the tribe to confirm its submission, including the payment of taxes. If confirmed, do not attack. +	d. Those who submit will not be molested. +	e. Those who do not answer with the Azaan, or after the Azaan do not confirm full submission, will be dealt with by fire and sword. +	f. All apostates who have killed Muslims will be killed, those who have burnt Muslims alive will be burnt alive. +	 	+	With these instructions Abu Bakr launched the forces of Islam against the apostates.

Oz freediver (talk) 11:33, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election
Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting
As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:36, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

User group for Military Historians
Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi Adil, Aslam 11:07, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

map of Byzantine-Sassan war
Assalamu alaykum. can i use your map picture for a book which i currently writing? of course i will credit ur name if u allow me to Ahendra (talk) 18:24, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Good article reassessment
Siege of Damascus (634), an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. --- C &amp; C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 02:15, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive
Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive and create a worklist at WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Rashidun Army article
Assalamu Alaikum Warrahmatullahi Wabarakaat.

Hello Mr. Adil. recently im doing massive overhaul of Rashidun Army as i think its criminally underdeveloped article for such decade. i think i need some of ur helps to improve the article quality so hopefully the article quality can be improved

Im also planning to expand the military article by creating separate Rashidun Navy, how do you think?

Anyway, i think u need to check the improvement in Ubadah ibn al-Samit article too Ahendra (talk) 09:15, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello
@Mohammad adil 209.171.85.223 (talk) 08:11, 10 March 2023 (UTC)