User talk:Northamerica1000/Archive 57

You are blocked
Sorry, you have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. --Tito Dutta (talk) 05:39, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Whoa, added a template below. Cheers! North America1000 05:42, 1 April 2016 (UTC)


 * You fooled me. HighInBC 05:41, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Sure, I was going to add a note tomorrow. --Tito Dutta (talk) 05:45, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * My response: Abfall.gif. North America1000 05:46, 1 April 2016 (UTC)


 * I got him back for you. As for you, I get you next year! But not with a fake block template. That's a little much. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:04, 1 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Wheel war! Wheel war! This is better than a food fight (although lord knows how Northamerica1000 loves a good food fight ). Softlavender (talk) 07:57, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

December 2004
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for being an awesome wikipedian. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. (April fools). – Davey 2010 Talk 12:53, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I wasn't registered in 2004. I think you got the wrong person. North America1000 12:58, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Ahh well I work for the Mi5 and I believe you're using 2 accounts.... because you're Jimbo Wales .... Are you apart of the Illuminati ? ... Maybe I'm apart of it .... who knows  – Davey 2010 Talk 13:48, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Actually, I'm a unicorn, and I live in a magical land with fairies and elves. North America1000 14:11, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * URI Unicórnio Rosa Invisivel.jpg
 * Oo oo are trolls allowed ?, I'm one big troll .... I have a lovely nose tho, – Davey 2010 Talk 14:16, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Troll in Trondheim.jpg
 * Ghost Stories December 1930.jpg
 * Hey again Davey! North America1000 14:26, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

An April Fools Salmon for you

 * I'm not sure what salmon has to do with April Fool's Day, but thanks all the same! North America1000 21:52, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Third opinion
Is this the right location for third opinions? Wikipedia talk:Third opinion? Valoem  talk   contrib  02:12, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Another user closed the discussion you started on the talk page there and provided instructions (posts go on the main page at WP:3O). FYI there's also the Dispute resolution noticeboard as an option you may consider, but you should only choose one of the two forums. North America1000 06:18, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Chiropractic Biophysics
Can you please userfy this plus the talk page for me. This is notable, , and many other sources. I would like to see what the condition of the article was in and improve it. Valoem  talk   contrib  21:17, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm going to decline this request at this time, because 1) consensus at the AfD discussion was very strong for deletion of the article, which included discussion about WP:MEDRS issues regarding the availability of sources, and 2) the sources you provided above are not sufficient to establish topic notability. Here's summary of the sources you provided above:
 * – The article is almost exclusively about issues regarding opioids, and provides no information about chiropractic biophysics itself, other than a mention of it at the end of the article in the author credit. It's also a primary source that is not independent from the overall topic, so it's not usable to establish topic notability. Note at the top of the article, where it states, "SPONSORED CONTENT PROVIDED BY R. TODD SHAVER - DOCTOR OF CHIROPRACTIC, SHAVER CHIROPRACTIC & NATURAL MEDICINE".
 * – Does not provide significant coverage about the topic, just passing mentions.
 * To establish notability, topics require having received significant coverage in independent reliable sources. If you are able to find such coverage, I recommend compiling them and then making a post at Deletion review regarding the article. North America1000 04:44, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I am sorry, but any editor acting in good faith should be allowed to retain a copy of the article. This allows me to see what state it was in and improve and rewrite the article. I will obviously go to DRV, this is very unfortunate given we've have pleasant interactions in the past.  Valoem   talk   contrib  04:51, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm not questioning your motives of faith, so please don't take matters personally. Per the circumstances of the article and deletion discussion, I am not comfortable bucking consensus to userfy the article in Wikipedia user namespace at this time. If you'd like, I can email you copies of the content you requested above. If you choose this option, and then improve the content to satisfy notability requirements, I seriously suggest submitting the article to Articles for creation, where the content can be reviewed. An easy way to do this when you're ready is to place atop the draft page and then select the "Submit your draft for review" link. North America1000 05:07, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I did not mean to make it sound personal. I understand that there is nothing to work on and better to start from scratch its one of the problems with Wikipedia not allowing non-admins to view deleted content. Also its perfect fine to decline if the content falls under A11, or copyright vio, I thought the article was sourced, it was not made clear the content was not workable, apologies for the misunderstanding. Valoem   talk   contrib  06:05, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

The same problems are happening at Koren Specific Technique. Mass MEDRS violations everywhere. QuackGuru ( talk ) 20:14, 28 March 2016 (UTC)


 * N.b. See the following discussion at 's talk page (diff). North America1000 15:51, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Happy Easter!



 * Thanks for the Easter cheer. Hey, just a reminder that I'm still waiting for your GA reviews at the following pages (it's been around 20 days since you accepted to review them): Talk:Mushroom ketchup/GA1, Talk:Vegetable chips/GA1, Talk:Deep-fried butter/GA1, Talk:Avocado cake/GA1. I have performed additional work on all of the articles to touch them up, and they are definitely ready for review. North America1000 04:50, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

WWE Hall of Fame
I removed the information from the WWE Hall of Fame wiki page because it was inaccurate. It's as simple as that. DaveA2424 (talk) 18:00, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Please consider using edit summaries, as I suggested at your talk page (diff) . North America1000 17:38, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

I removed the same content due to inaccurate information and included an edit summary this time. DaveA2424 (talk) 18:00, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. This makes it clearer to others when you make such changes. North America1000 18:01, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Before the day is over....
I just wanted to drop by and tell you how much I love my unicorn. In fact, I changed my look a little to match it!! I may have attached the horn a bit too low. Atsme 📞📧 02:56, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Sam's Chicken has been nominated for Did You Know

 * N.b. I only performed a few edits, so not really a significant contributor. North America1000 19:39, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Animals as food
Do you think we need a child category called Category:Animals as food under Category:Animals, or is the navbox Template:Meat enough?

Examples:


 * Chicken as food
 * Anchovies as food

Best,

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:55, 2 April 2016 (UTC)


 * My initial reaction is probably not. There's Category:Meat, which is a subcategory of Category:Animal products, which seems to pretty much cover it. North America1000 00:00, 3 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Ah, right. Okay. Pity Anchovies as food can't fit there. Hmmmmmm. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:02, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, I added some WikiProject tags to the Category talk:Marine edible fish page... North America1000 00:04, 3 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks! And we have Category:Animal-based seafood as a child of cat meat. I guess that's fine. Cheers. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:05, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Cat meat sounds NASTY (to me). North America1000 00:07, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I meant category meat. :) Just woke up. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:08, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Smilie Kissen.jpg 00:09, 3 April 2016 (UTC)]]


 * Thank you. :) That actually looks like me right now. I'm all floppy and spaced out. Need coffee. I just missed that Animal-based seafood link. Anyhow, thanks for tolerating yet another of my pointless issues raised. At least it was quick. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:13, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * There's no such thing as a pointless issue, is there? Hey, coffee sounds good right about now...I'll make a cup. North America1000 00:15, 3 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the suggestion. I love coffee! North America1000 00:36, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Mmmmmmmm, coffee. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:09, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Caffeine. North America1000 17:00, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-14
 Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available. Recent changes
 * You can filter Special:Log in more detail.
 * Wikimedia wikis have a new way of counting visitors.

Changes this week
 * Octicons-sync.svg The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from April 5. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from April 6. It will be on all wikis from April 7 (calendar).

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.  22:13, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors April 2016 Newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 April 2016
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Testaroli
The article Testaroli you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Testaroli for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 22:41, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Lean finely textured beef in its finished form.png
Thanks for uploading File:Lean finely textured beef in its finished form.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:41, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Deep-fried butter
The article Deep-fried butter you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Deep-fried butter for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wilhelmina Will -- Wilhelmina Will (talk) 06:41, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mushroom ketchup
The article Mushroom ketchup you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mushroom ketchup for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wilhelmina Will -- Wilhelmina Will (talk) 07:01, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Avocado cake
The article Avocado cake you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Avocado cake for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wilhelmina Will -- Wilhelmina Will (talk) 11:01, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of French fry vending machine
The article French fry vending machine you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:French fry vending machine for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 21:41, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Dats a lotta dim sum
Thanks ! &mdash; Cirt (talk) 11:58, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Dats a lotta dim sum
Thanks ! &mdash; Cirt (talk) 11:58, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Testaroli
The article Testaroli you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Testaroli for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 01:41, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice
The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly. Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:01, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Draft:Edward Andrew Selby

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks for the star; quite unexpected. North America1000 20:35, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Food and Drink
Just wanted to say thank you for the invite to Food and Drink, again. I'm not very active (I've only created 3 articles there, although I really enjoyed creating all 3, especially Pastrami on rye, but I've saved a few from G13 or AfD), but I think as time goes on I'll be more active there. There's just so much work that needs to be done in the early film area, sometimes I get overwhelmed. Anyway, got the monthly newsletter and just thought I'd take the time to say thank you again.  Onel 5969  TT me 00:57, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks, and thanks for creating the Pastrami on rye article. Sometimes it's amazing how one can find a particular topic that does not yet have an article. I have nominated the article to appear as a Main page DYK entry. See: Template:Did you know nominations/Pastrami on rye. North America1000 19:56, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks NA! It's my favorite sandwich, and, as I discovered in researching it, is pretty notable. I have to get more involved in DYK, I've only nominated a half-dozen or so, but I do get involved in enough article expansion, creation or GA edits that I should do more.  Onel 5969  TT me 20:01, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I try to include DYK as one of my procedural tasks when creating a new article; when a new article qualifies for DYK, might as well nominate it. North America1000 20:33, 2 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Per your interest in such topics, check out the new Roast beef sandwich article created today. North America1000 22:56, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Damn you! That was the next article I was going to write. . Nice job! Was going to write an article on the Peanut Butter and Banana Sandwich, but it's already covered at the Peanut butter, banana and bacon sandwich article.  Onel 5969  TT me 23:44, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Project Accuracy
May I impose and ask you to please consider joining me as a coordinator for WP:Project Accuracy (WPA)? The initial plan is to recruit 3 or 5 WPA coordinators to oversee the project, work collaboratively with the various project teams regarding their GA and FA promotions, and become part of or help with the creation of an editorial review board (or team or committee)? An editor recently suggested a possible name change to "Accredited review" or "Accredited editor". WPA is in its embryonic stages of development, and I am currently in discussions with a WMF staffer who is helping me get things coordinated for a possible grant. Atsme 📞📧 13:07, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I'll need time to consider this matter. Thanks for the invitation. North America1000 13:15, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you, NA1000 - I have a discussion scheduled today with WMF staff to help polish the proposal and iron out the kinks. It would help greatly if I could demonstrate that I had at least 3 quality editors who are supporting it. One of the things I wanted to propose is that part of the grant money would be used for special incentives wherein WPA offers monetary awards to the winning project team for having the most WPA promoted submissions.  This is one of the reasons we need 5 to 7 primary project coordinators helping with such details) Example - the  winner of the contest is the team (or it could be an individual) who submits the most FAs that receive the RAA gold seal within a certain time frame.  Such a contest would encourage more editors to join a project team and further encourage quality output.  It would also encourage collaboration and help immensely in achieving the kinds of articles we need. Let's say the Project Med team wins with their submission of 20 FAs that were promoted by WPA with their RAA gold seal (the project team members did the majority of the substantive editing, were involved in the review process, etc).  All 20 FAs get promoted to RAA (reviewed and approved).  The team gets recognized for winning the contest but in addition to the trophy (badge of some sort) they also receive $xxx or equivalent product the WMF could get donated.  After WPA announces which team wins, the winning team determines who receives the $.  I would think the recipients would be the active team members who actually registered to be in the contest and did the work which can be confirmed by their edit history for the promoted articles.  Just an idea I'm tossing out for some of the incentives the grant could help us achieve. Atsme 📞📧 14:07, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I can't commit to signing on at this time. However, I haven't disqualified the notion of doing so in the future. North America1000 16:49, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

MFD relistings
There is no consensus at WT:MFD for admin's to Relist discussions especially indiscriminate relistings without a comment. I have begun reverting your deletionist attempts to get content wrongfully deleted. Close as no consensus as that is now MFD policy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.171.121.19 (talk • contribs) 20:24, 1 April 2016 (UTC) "The intent of the deletion process is to attempt to determine consensus on whether an article should be deleted. However, if at the end of the initial seven-day period, the discussion has only a few participants (including the nominator), and/or it seems to be lacking arguments based on policy, it may be appropriate for the closer to relist it, to solicit further discussion to determine consensus."
 * You should consider reading WP:RELIST:
 * Also, your reading of consensus in the discussions on the talk page is the opposite of the actual consensuses there. North America1000 20:35, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

No response here?

Source removal
Just to go off of that edit summary, I generally remove instances of extra sources such as that when I can, because it makes articles unwieldy when there are ten or so citations after a fact. I would have done it even if I did not vote, but I wanted to clean it up to help the article look a bit more professional. On the other hand, the amount of sources that was there before can often appear to be an attempt to make something appear more notable than it really is, which could influence more people into a delete vote on that discussion. I hope this helps to clarify things, and let me know if you have any further questions. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 16:54, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

AfDs
No, I can entirely say that those Transformers AfDs were not going towards any other result and I myself would've participated but it was clear enough, not to mention because the article had no signs of independent notability. Furthermore, threatening me with ANI is completely unnecessary as my participation at AfD outweighs any "troubles" I am supposedly causing. Furthermore, I know I have not been the only one to close an AfD and not merge the contents as mentioned, after all the contents are always in the history logs anyway. Furthermore, if you're going to mention the "too early", AfD also states that if a consensus is clear enough as it was with Transformers, it may be closed (two or three votes are enough at best and AfDs have been closed as such before). I'm going to be honest, if you and I can't see eye to eye, it may be best for us not to closely encounter each other. SwisterTwister  talk  18:48, 1 April 2016 (UTC)


 * I'm an administrator and perform a great deal of work at AfD, so it would be irresponsible of me to ignore these types of errors that occur. Please don't take it personally. As I explained on your talk page:
 * At the deletion guideline page at Wikipedia:Deletion process § Early closure, it states "In general, deletion discussions should remain open for at least seven days (168 hours) to allow interested editors adequate time to participate". Please allow for a full seven days before closing AfD discussions.


 * Articles for deletion/Foot selfie and Articles for deletion/List of Android association football games were closed as merge, but the proper templates were not added to the article pages and merge target talk pages. You closed the discussions with a merge result (diff) and a "merge and redirect" result (diff), but then redirected the articles against consensus. There was not enough user input at Articles for deletion/Cab (Transformers) (link after reverting your closure) and Articles for deletion/Checkpoint (Transformers) (link after reverting the close) to warrant early closures for these discussions either, and I feel that your reading of the consensus is not entirely accurate.


 * The Administrator instructions for closing with a merge result need to be followed, because these procedures were determined through discussion and consensus. It is entirely unclear why you're against following the proper procedures, and it comes across that your closures may potentially include the interjection of your personal preferences. It's very simple, just follow the proper procedures.


 * For the early closures, how did you determine a consensus for redirection (diff, diff)? At Articles for deletion/Cab (Transformers) the nominator essentially only opines for deletion, one user opines to "Keep or Merge" and one opines to "Merge and Redirect". Note that "Merge and Redirect" means just that, not just to only redirect. After merges occur, the page is then redirected.


 * It's exactly the same situation at Articles for deletion/Checkpoint (Transformers)


 * I've explained the process for merges before on your talk page before (diff), and you provided no response. After this, you then continued to close discussions as merge without following the Administrator instructions. This is why I mentioned the notion of ANI if my sincere requests continue to be ignored.


 * Why not just follow the proper procedures? It's in the best interest of the encyclopedia, and the !votes of users that opine for merging should be respected, rather than ignored. North America1000 19:09, 1 April 2016 (UTC)


 * If I may add a note here: I saw this comment above from you about early closure, "it may be closed (two or three votes are enough at best and AfDs have been closed as such before", and I strongly disagree with it. I would never early-close a discussion with just two or three !votes. In fact I think (and Wikipedia instructions state) that discussions should very rarely be closed early. They should stay open for 7 days except for the occasional case of SPEEDY or SNOW. A SNOW close is not 2 or 3 !votes; it is IMO at least 6, policy based, with no dissents - a discussion that has "not a snowball's chance in hell" of any other result. I know you have been participating at AfD for a very long time; please listen to advice from a couple of admins who have also been working at AfD for years. --MelanieN (talk) 20:10, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Relisting at MFD
Just a point but if you relist a page at MFD, you should also add a new timestamp at the top so that the bot will properly re-sort the discussion. That's part of the massive fighting at WT:MFD but it's needed. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 22:34, 5 April 2016 (UTC) I've been here 11 years, I'm well aware there's no relationship. It makes no sense why having more time would have stuff deleted until you believe that the more eyes will cause things to be deleted. I'm pointing out the futility of trying to argue about it at this point. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 23:25, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I noticed this being performed before, so I will keep this in mind for future reference. North America1000 22:42, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * And sorry about the stupidity at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Rico Dinero. Unlike your relistings, for the last months, every time I have relisted an MFD discussion it has been reverted until the guise of being "discriminate and/or without comment" or whatever other demand has been made. I'd rather not revert and block for that kind of antics but the ANI discussions have been flooded with "you're a terrible deletionist for relisting these" so we have the idiocy at WT:MFD and so on. I don't care to engage in that level of nonsense any longer. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 22:52, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * For what it's worth, relisting is not particularly correlated with deletionism. When discussions receive few or no !votes or do not have significant guideline/policy-based arguments and are relisted in order for a clearer consensus to be determined, sometimes users !vote to retain the content. Conversely, sometimes content is deleted with no input from anyone other than the nominator without a relist being performed. North America1000 22:59, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Ricky81682, North America, Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Rico Dinero appears to have been "kept" on the influence of a !vote from a banned editor. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:13, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Plus it is a banned IP troll that has been hounding Ricky for some time: see discussions here and here and a summary through last December here. I don't understand why Ricky closed on the !vote of his personal troll, who he must be quite familiar with by now - did he not notice who the !vote was from? Clearly, his apology for the troll's "stupidity" here indicates that he thought about the close more than perfunctorily A2soup (talk) 18:24, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Pinging to bring the new comment above to their attention. North America1000 18:31, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

I'm aware of who this is. This character has been taking discussion I closed a half decade ago to DRV. However, if I revert or argue that their nonsense is nonsense, I've been chewed out for being biased because this character is attacking me (no, the irony of calling it uncivil to remove an uncivil comment from a banned user is not surprising to me). Welcome to the reason why no one ever wants to sign up for RFA, you get ripped to shreds for trying to deal with your own trolls following you around. Nevertheless, I reversed the closure and relisted the discussion. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 21:37, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Organic chocolate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cacao. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
 * . North America1000 10:19, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Wikiproject Food and Drink Newsletter – April 2016
– Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 17:00, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Bean dip
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Tech News: 2016-15
 Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available. Recent changes
 * The visual editor can generate wikicode with image options in your language. Examples of image options are "thumb" or "left". You can ask to change to options in your language in Phabricator.
 * Wiktionaries and Wikisources can now use the visual editor. It is an opt-in beta feature. It still needs development to work better with these projects.
 * ORES is using new models. Tools that use ORES' predictions can behave strangely. ORES also has a new API.
 * The visual editor now supports classical Greek characters.

Problems
 * There was a bug when you used keyboard arrows in templates in the visual editor. This has now been fixed.

Changes this week
 * Octicons-sync.svg The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 12 April. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 13 April. It will be on all wikis from 14 April (calendar).
 * The wikipedia.org portal will get many small bug fixes and improvements. Most will be for the search box and suggested results that were added in March.

Meetings
 * Octicons-sync.svg You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs you think are the most important. The meeting will be on 12 April at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
 * Octicons-tools.svg You can join the next meeting with the Architecture committee. The topics this week are improving transclusion of templates for Parsoid and balanced templates. The meeting will be on 13 April at 21:00 (UTC). See how to join.

Future changes
 * Wikimedia has a new backup data center in Dallas. Because of planned work on this, you will be able to read but not edit the wikis for a short period of time on both 19 April and 21 April. This will start at 14:00 UTC and last for 15 to 30 minutes.

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.  20:44, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Pink slime
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:33, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Dessert sauce
 * added links pointing to Bourbon and Crème
 * and left Crème as-is, for the French definition on the dab page. North America1000 10:32, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Pop out cake
 * added a link pointing to Daily Star
 * . North America1000 10:31, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 April 2016
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Closure of appeal
Hi, I appealed for a removal of a ban imposed on me, here at Administrator's noticeboard/Incidents. Since the discussions are archived after 36 hours, I am unsure and hence want to know when this will be closed. I am primarily concerned because I apprehend that it might be archived before coming to a result. Please help me out. Thanks. RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 17:48, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * N.b. As you've likely already noticed, the discussion was closed in your favor. North America1000 19:48, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * P.S. For future reference, to postpone pages from being archived, you can add Do not archive until and the bump template to denote the delay created. North America1000 03:56, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your work on chocolate!
Thank you for helping to improve articles related to superfood nutrition, especially chocolate. Raw chocolate is a true superfood, and organic chocolate is a phenomenon worthy of recognition. David Wolfe is a pioneer in this market. Wikipedia should be impartial about alternative topics worthy of recognition.

Thanks again!! Glacier2009 (talk) 04:12, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I didn't really perform that much, but thanks. Something I like about Dark chocolate is that it has a significant amount of antioxidants. North America1000 04:02, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Jamie Masada
Sorry, I had no idea about the copyright infringement (didn't know anybody had copyright on it). Again, sorry.Miep2 (talk) 04:45, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * In addition to the information I left on your talk page, check out Plagiarism. Thanks, North America1000 04:46, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Again, I'm sorry and it is removed (didn't know I'd written something that was based on plagiarism) Miep2 (talk) 19:46, 8 April 2016 (UTC) Thank you for working to keep the Jamie Masada-article published! However, on your recent shuffling with the pictures, I have a few objections... that 'the original Laugh Factory...' picture makes a nice 'article-picture', and the 'Marquee'-picture is supposed to be illustrative (is that a word?) of the Thanksgiving and Christmas meals. Oh, and while you're busy anyway, could you do your 'Wikipedia-link' magic to this link http://www.hadassahmagazine.org/2006/06/11/profile-jamie-masada/ and add it to the 'Further reading'-section? Thanks so much Miep2 (talk) 22:20, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I formatted and added the source you provided above to the article (diff), and moved the image. I didn't read the text in the marquee when I initially moved the image. North America1000 22:28, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * You're forgiven, and thanks a lot for the magic link ;) Miep2 (talk) 22:33, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Um... how about if I tried to put you on the trail of my Laugh_Factory article (cuz The Banner put such a ghastly box there too)? Miep2 (talk) 22:46, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * OMG you're good Miep2 (talk) 00:29, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Vegetable chips
The article Vegetable chips you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Vegetable chips for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wilhelmina Will -- Wilhelmina Will (talk) 11:22, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

User talk:Holly at FireText
Hi. I see you have blocked this user for having an unacceptable username. But at WP:ISU it says "However, usernames are acceptable if they contain a company or group name but are clearly intended to denote an individual person, such as "Mark at WidgetsUSA", "Jack Smith at the XY Foundation", "WidgetFan87", etc.", so I don't see why "Holly at FireText" is problematic. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:53, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pointing out this important point. I have unblocked the user. North America1000 10:03, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Great, thanks. (There are far too many of these little rules hidden about the place ;-) Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:20, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

AfD help
Hi. Hate to bug you. I went to nominate an article, Childress Vineyards for deletion, with the following summary: "Other than the fact of it being owned by a celebrity sportsperson, article has been cited for lack of sources since 2013. Searches turned up a number of hits, but all in the trivial mention category, for the most part, or in the local paper (which doesn't satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH. I was actually surprised, as I was going to add citations, at the dearth of available references."

When I clicked submit, the tag on the article appeared, but the article's entry at AfD did not. I would simply have reverted, and attempted it again, but was unsure if by so doing it would screw something up. Thanks in advance. Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 18:34, 12 April 2016 (UTC)


 * This popped at WP:BADAFD - I'll sort it out, using the rationale above. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 20:23, 12 April 2016 (UTC)


 * ✅. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 20:26, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that, .  Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 20:31, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Wow, I didn't even have to do anything. North America1000 20:49, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Girl in cake
I noticed that you are one of the leading editors at List of cakes. Do you know if we have an article or content in a section of another article for the type of giant cake from which a model pops out for festive occasions (e. g. this video)? I understand that these are sometimes made largely or entirely of cardboard and frosting, but sometimes there is a real cake outside of the hidden compartment. I have tried surprise cake, pop cake and popup cake.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:39, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I also saw your post at WT:FOOD. After some searches, it does not appear that an article exists for this. It"s mentioned in some articles, and here's an instance of a male jumping out of a cake, but that appears to be it. Sounds like you have found a new article to create. North America1000 20:59, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Do you know what the article name should be?--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 21:14, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I'd probably go with Surprise cake. North America1000 21:16, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * suggested pop out cake, which generates google search images for the subject at hand, while surprise cake does not. I am going with pop out cake. Thanks for the encouragement.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 22:11, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Disregard the warning. That previous person was an imposter
Hi, Early you received a post about being warned and possibly being blocked. That was an imposter who created a similar username, but with only 1 “p” at User:Winterystepe. He's now blocked. im just letting you know that Im the real person and I won't do that. Shoutout to for taking quick action in 6 minutes. Happy Editing Winterysteppe (talk) 00:36, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅. North America1000 00:44, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Talkpage
Hi Northamerica1000, I apologize for moaning ... but do you honestly feel all of the messages at Talk:Clarawood are of relevence to the article in hand?,

Bar the DRV They're all just "moans" about being reverted and in general are "moans" about the editor reverting....., Maybe I'm assuming Bad Faith here but I honestly can't see the point in having it all there when in reality it belongs on the users talkpage?,

Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 01:20, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I collapsed the content on the talk page. Let me know if that works for you or not. Oh, and I don't mind your moaning, it's better than groaning. North America1000 22:57, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi North, Oh wow thank you :), Hahaha that's very true! :), Have a great weekend and thanks again for that compromise :), Cheers, – Davey 2010 Talk 23:47, 15 April 2016 (UTC)