User talk:Piotrus/Archive 19

Open Source Directory
PreTender submitted eve-wiki to the CCP fansite list months ago and I've tried again and also on the Open Directory project. Can you help? Leave me a message at eve-wiki.net —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alatari (talk • contribs) 04:54, August 26, 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia weekly interview
Hi there, I noticed that you are an extremly high contributor to FA and was wondering if you would like to be interviewed for an upcoming episode of Wikipedia Weekly? I would be interested in talking about why you are involved in WP, what areas are you specifically involved in, the Polish wikipedia community and their specific issues. Does this sound interesting? I hope to hear from you soon. Witty Lama 12:08, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, we record over Skype so you would need that program and a headset microphone. I'm fairly flexible with times but I'm in Australia (10 hours ahead of polish time I believe). Is tomorrow (sunday) ok? Witty Lama 17:19, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I worked out that I'm 8 hours ahead of Polish time (if you are indeed in Poland), so 10:00 Sunday for you is 18:00 Sunday for me. If you can be available for half an hour that's fine. I'll see you there! What's your skype name? Witty Lama 01:46, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah, so if you're in eastern US 10am would mean midnight for me. That's ok for me. Are you up for that - 10am sunday Eastern US time? Witty Lama 05:41, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Has it happened yet? The lama should have paired you with Ghirla.....well, we need take #2.  Blnguyen  ( bananabucket ) 06:58, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

The Ep is now up and going. Enjoy. Witty Lama 06:19, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Jan Czyński
Hello Piotrus. My Polish being effectively non-existent, can you tell me if pl:Jan Czyński was in Paris in the 1830s. I assume so - "great emigration" I did understand. I'm trying to figure out if he is the person who co-authored a book called Le Roi des Paysans (published in Paris in 1838). My Belgian source calls this person Jean Czynski. Many thanks in advance! Angus McLellan (Talk) 08:38, 18 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Colour me impressed! Thanks for that. Trawling through the BNF catalogue has confirmed that he was indeed my Jean Czynski. Thanks again and all the best, Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:56, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

GAC
What a refreshing thought. --Poeticbent talk  02:54, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Lack of respect for WP:UE
That where real disruptions lies. M0RD00R 18:27, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Kiev
Just renominate it - and I think you might title the nomination Kiev 2 - there should be details on the page.-- daniel folsom  01:57, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Enlightenment Template
Hi! Terribly sorry to spam you, but, remembering your interest in the Template:Enlightenment, I thought you might be interested to know that I have started a discussion on the inclusion criteria; it would be great if you came over to Template talk:Enlightenment to take part. --AVIosad(talk) 13:59, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Something for you I guess
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Democracy#Why_no_mention_of_Poland.3F --HanzoHattori 19:21, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

fair use
Hi Piotrus, is still fair use in apply ? I have an article without image where is not possible to obtain public domain image.  ≈Tulkolahten≈ ≈talk≈ 10:24, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Question for you
Please see Articles for deletion/Rodryg Dunin 2. Is it possible to obtain a text and or translation of the article referring to him? If you will check the history of this and related articles, you will see why there is a certain skepticism about both the accuracy of the facts related and the extent to which he encyclopedia article supports them. DGG (talk) 04:17, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The Polish version has been on the talkpage since January 2006. --Elonka 06:51, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Antoni Julian Nowowiejski
A template has been added to the article Antoni Julian Nowowiejski, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. Porcupine (prickle me!) 19:30, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Antoni Julian Nowowiejski
Antoni Julian Nowowiejski, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Antoni Julian Nowowiejski satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Antoni Julian Nowowiejski and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Antoni Julian Nowowiejski during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Porcupine (prickle me!) 19:34, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar
Well Estonians story is simple. Most of them came when the Russian media attack started against Estonia during the Bronze soldier of Tallinn incident. Some articles were really horrible at the time, Estonian flag under Estonia was replaced with nazi german one all the time, etc. Many editors came in. Some old editors were drawn into the spin, etc. The first sock/meatpuppetry accusations came from the fact that estonian editors were quite same minded. Estonian media gave detailed updates on situation and many people like myself were also in the center of the situation so saw the incidents with their own eyes. So there was not much room for debate if someone wrote that the soldier was dismantled sawn to pieces peed on or what ever as we knew it wasn't and thats why we all reverted that. So as people knew something for sure they ofcourse acted the same.

When the so called Established Editors came into frame the things got more serious and they tried to eliminate some opposing editors. They succeeded on some cases. Mostly humble editors who were here before to edit encyclopedia not to battle. Others didn't give up so easily. Now as the things have cooled down a bit, the editors are quite hard working and Estonia related articles are better than they have ever been.

Estonian (and now Latvian, Lithuanian, Polish, etc.) editors are also observing each others work to assist where necessary. It's sometimes happens that they also meet at AFD's and other votes for similar reason. Some editors are also available on #wikipedia channel so we have held discussions there. I can't speak for other editors because I don't know, but I don't have any sockpuppets and I don't think any other one has any either.

The RFCU process makes me a bit sad. I shuffled over some old RFCU cases and the methodology they use seems like extremely unreliable. It seems they use some very mean statistics in style: 1) Assuming every 1000000th person in world is editing english wikipedia. 2) Assuming estonia has 1.4m people. 3) Estonia can have 14 wikipedians. 4) As the threshold is already exceeded, every new wikipedian must be a sockpuppet of the earlier editors. Suva Чего? 15:25, 24 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Suva's point regarding information dissemination speed is very interesting.
 * Estonia is a relatively small country, with about three or four – depending on the criteria – primary population centres. If anything significant happens in any of them, a significant percentage of Estonia's populations would be able to see it, the local news would be all over it, and if national news gets interested, can arrive within hours.  Thus, it's customary that Estonian news is operative, has redundancy – because multiple news sources often report on the same events – and can be easily backed up with eyewitness accounts.
 * Russian Federation, on the other hand, is the largest – area-wise – country on Earth, with numerous timezones and hundreds of major population centres in it. Most of newsworthy events in Russia, unless they happen in Moscow or Sankt Petersburg, would have only a very limited percentage of the whole population as direct eyewitnesses, and due to the great distances and poor infrastructure, it's prohibitively expensive to send a national reporter residing in, say, Yaroslav, to Vladivostok to cover something as insignificant as, say, a riot.  Accordingly, it's customary that Russian news makes use of division of labour region-wise, and depends on relatively long chains of newswire relays, with only limited redundancy.  The resulting lack of redundancy allows the Chinese telephone effect to creep in rather readily.
 * Even if we would put away purely cultural issues, such difference is, to some degree, dictated by the economics and infrastructure.
 * Accordingly, when an internationally interesting event in Estonia happens, it's only natural that news-following Estonians have a relatively similar – and relatively factual – overview of it, close to real time, but Russian news coverings deviate in various ways, and thus, Russian folks would have many different views. This is not a virtue; it's a sign of news inefficiency. ΔιγυρενΕμπροσ! 18:55, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Antoni Julian Nowowiejski
Hi, I closed AFD as a non-admin due to the obvious keep consensus. Happy editing.  ≈Tulkolahten≈ ≈talk≈ 22:46, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
 * btw I also borrowed "You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Thank you." from your talk page if you don't mind.  ≈Tulkolahten≈ ≈talk≈ 23:00, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, and a question: Poland-related noticeboard
Thank your for awarding me a badge of honour for my contributions related to Poland. And also for an invitation to join the Poland/Poland-related WP noticeboard. I have a question related to the latter:

What additional rights/duties does the membership of the said noticeboard confer, on top of what every common, or garden variety, WP editor can/cannot/should/shouldn't do? I an not a natural 'joiner', so unless there is some 'value added' (value for the community and/or for me) in the membership, I'll stay, and carry on contributing occasionally, as a freelance outsider.--Jotel 12:49, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Monobook is in Category:Wikipedia tools
''Your monobook is in Category:Wikipedia tools. This is most likely because when you were copying scripts into yout monobook you accidentaly copied their category. Since your monobook is not a tool itself, please remove this category from it (like this). If you intend for your monobook to be a tool, please consider creating a subpage with a more descriptive name, and moving the category there. Thank you, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 23:56, 14 September 2007 (UTC)''
 * Sorry for the late response as I have been on vacaction. My monobook doesn't have any category tags. It is quite short and I even did a word search in the edit screen.-- Birgitte  SB  16:00, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for figuring that out. I think I have fixed it.-- Birgitte  SB  18:10, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

interview
Dzien dobry! I just heard your interview on Wikipedia Weekly! :) I especially liked your statement that civility rules need to be enforced more effectively, somehow. I completely agree that incivility and general obnoxiousness is the biggest on-wiki problem we have to deal with...

Also, it was just neat to hear your voice! :) K. Lásztocska 18:09, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

SIP39
I've gone through the article trying to get it back into shape. I didn't feel I could cut that large chunk of material that was added to the lead, because even though the information was all covered and reffed in the article already, it is properly reffed and the editor took care over it. So I've put it in a note for the time being.

One problem I haven't solved is that someone added Soviet casualty figures to the lead. Nothing wrong with that in principle, but the figures were only from one source (which they took from our infobox). I have not yet been able to think of a way of summarising the varied figures for Russian casualties pithily (and good expression is essential; blocks of figures tramelled with ifs and buts are alienating to readers). For the time being, therefore, I've cut both Polish and Soviet figures from the lead; but this is unsatisfactory because the PoW figures are still there, sitting uncomfortably now. If you can think of a way to express both sets of figures briefly and accurately for the lead, please do so. In this, I think the article is a victim of its own success because, unlike books (which seem to choose the particular set of figures which suit their bent), it tries to inform the readers of the whole range of different possible figures. This is invaluable and unique but is not easy to summarise in the lead.qp10qp 04:25, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Question
Hello, when you split up the articles on the Wołyń Voivodeship, one of them read Wołyń Voivodeship (1921–1919). I moved to Wołyń Voivodeship (1918-1939), which are the dates given in the article, but I hope I didn't mess anything up. Perhaps you go look over what I did and make sure. Thanks, Ostap 20:24, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Maybe you can fix it here: where it reads (1921-1919). Thank you.  Ostap 20:26, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Typos are the worst arent they? Thanks again, Ostap 20:31, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * You might want to look over the ones left, because I wasn't sure what to do with them. Ostap 21:16, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 24th, 2007.


You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 02:28, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

how i work
I have never consistently supported any one person's view on these articles. I'm not about to rewrite them. The only way to go that is acceptable at WP is that the different parties discus sit on the talk page until they agree. In my experience, on any topic, compromise is almost always the best way to find such an agreement. this is intended as encouragement for you to continue to discuss with each other, not with me. (posted to Lokyz also) DGG (talk) 00:49, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Burma
You may wish to add your opinion to this dogfight .István 19:13, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

mala prosba
hej, chcialem zaczac pisac/tlumaczyc cos z pl.wiki do en.wiki. Ale swojego angielskiego nie moge byc w 100% pewny, niektorych zwrotow nie da sie nauczyc siedzac caly czas w Polsce. Przydalby mi sie taki szablon ktorym opatrzylbym nowo powstaly artykul, zeby jakis native to przeczytal i wylapal wszelkie bledy stylistyczne. Istnieje taki szablon? Str13 09:34, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

RE:Relevance?
I don't believe I did misunderstand the situation. Irpen repeateadly asked about the credentials of the website about the Warsaw Uprising, Tymek answered with attacks on Irpen's general editing patterns (and his alleged "Soviet nationality"). It wasn't until this edit of yours that Irpen's question was truly answered. I wasn't saying that these websites violeted WP:RS, but I believe one can expect people who add non-English sources to give some evidence for their reliability. That's all Irpen expected, as far as I can tell. Obviously the uncivility in this discussion is merely a consequence of a general dispute about Eastern European topics on the English Wikipedia, but in this case, I don't think Irpen's conduct was the problem.--Carabinieri 21:59, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: Adam Lazarowicz DYK
Thanks for letting me know, Piotrus. To be honest, I didn't really see the problem with the references in the first place; they're certainly no worse than many other articles that have been used at DYK with no problem. However, I'm so far from an expert in this area that I'd personally be uncomfortable transferring the article to use at DYK unless Irpen were to formally withdraw his/her objections. I'll put a note against the hook tentatively supporting it, and hope someone stops by who knows enough about the subject to make a decision. Regards, Espresso Addict 03:32, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
 * As Irpen has now withdrawn the objection, I've transferred the Adam Lazarowicz to the update template; if none of the other DYK editors objects, it should be featured on the main page within a few hours. Cheers, Espresso Addict 04:50, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Your DYK nomination for Adam Lazarowicz was successful
Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 (talk) 06:03, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Re: Hmmmm
Translator. Przeniółsbym sam ale nie wiem jak na en wiki. To co zrobił M.K to forsowanie litewskiego nacjonalizmu. Litewski nigdy nie był językiem urzędowym w I RP. W ten sposób to hasło o prezydencie USA powinno być zatytułowane Džordžas Bušas. Pozdrawiam Posnaniensis 08:56, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Pilsudski
Well, I even know that Polish Communist party supported Pilsudski's coup. :-) That pilsudski slammed a bunch of cretins, so what? `'Míkka 22:42, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

I am not a historian and have no interest in this topic, but I know about quite a few publications which drew parallels between Mussolini and Pilsudski. `'Míkka 22:44, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Some historians said, that Smetona did use Pilsudski's nationalist cop as an example. So what?--Lokyz 22:56, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Katyn
Piotrus, have you seen this disgrace? The official newspaper of the Russian government (Rossiyskaya gazeta) contends that existing evidence of the Soviet responsibility for Katyn is not reliable (apparently they are too embarrased to publish this piece online). This shouldn't go unnoticed here. Colchicum 14:06, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Done. BTW, I think that the relevant document published as a reaction to this in Gazeta Wyborcza is PD. What do you think? Colchicum 19:18, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I meant that note by Beria (picture). Well, it is an old official document of the Soviet government. Colchicum 19:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:PZL P.11c.jpg
Hello Piotrus. I was browsing possibly unfree images, and I came across a mention of Image:PZL P.11c.jpg, uploaded by Halibutt. If Halibutt is not around, can you maybe check this? The discussion is at. All the best, Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:14, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 03, 2007


Automatically delivered by COBot 02:51, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Polish October
The article Polish October you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. It hasn't failed because it's basically a good article, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Polish October for things needed to be addressed. Van Tucky  Talk 21:38, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Krakow
Hi Piotrus, there seems to be an ongoing edit-war between some editors, and because there is a GA-nominee procedure I don't know which version is good, but there are some editors proposing Cracow or Krakow in the leading of the article which I think is against wikipedia naming conventions.  ≈Tulkolahten≈ ≈talk≈ 21:32, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I think that RM is pointless too. It will end in the never-ending dispute as many times before in another articles. But I am concerned about the fact that in more and more articles there is dispute about the nationality. Typical example is Copernicus, entire planet knows he was a Polish, but on wikipedia he was an European based on the creaky fact there was "no nationality between year ...", try to do it anywhere and you will end as a vandal ... :-/  ≈Tulkolahten≈ ≈talk≈ 23:16, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The point made by Tulkolahten touches on one of the weakest points of Wikipedia. By design, we are forced to accept revisionist viewpoints (providing that they’re verifiable), while attempting to defend those expressed by leading encyclopedias. All this is done in the name of equality among editors some of whom would have never been allowed to contribute anything anywhere else outside of here. Take a look at how Gdańsk is being battered these days, not just Kraków, or Copernicus... and so many others. --Poeticbent  talk  01:19, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Category:Notable or notorious antisemites
I urge you please to change your position to Keep because otherwise it seems it will be deleted. As you know, I'm sure, Jews were also Polish citizens until the Nazis exterminated almost all of Polish Jews. I find it shocking that there is fear that this classification is too subjective. Is Murder too subjective? --Ludvikus 15:32, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your message. What I'm saying is that we must compromise because otherwise we will not win. That's what parlimentarianism requires. I certainly would prefer the expression Category:Antisemite. But the ojection to that would be that the (imaginary) grocer next door to you, whom you know, but is a noboy would qualify for inclusion in our classification. So by putting notable in we could say (so to speak) that he's a nobody and not important enough to be included. Pon rusumi tso ya muveem do pana? Dgenkuye panu, --Ludvikus 21:59, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

3RR
Hi Piotrus, can this be taken as 3RR ?  ≈Tulkolahten≈ ≈talk≈ 16:08, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Edits are not same, there is pretty edit warring but where to report?  ≈Tulkolahten≈ ≈talk≈ 19:19, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * done.  ≈Tulkolahten≈ ≈talk≈ 20:49, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Closed as no violation.  ≈Tulkolahten≈ ≈talk≈ 21:26, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Review
FYI: Deletion_review Martintg 02:09, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Need an opinion
Seeing this, my gut feel is unnecessary over catting. What do you think? (Though its nice having some others taking an interest in this massive task!) I've had no interaction with the gent, so don't know how busy a beaver he's been. For sure, leaving the GG's catted in both this and the parent was a wrong move. CFD? Hope you had a great summer! Think I'll go read me some more of 1634: The Bavarian Crisis--it's almost bedtime anyways. Cheers! // Fra nkB 03:47, 5 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I think it's fine - not what I'd create, but if it's here... why bother deleting it?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 04:14, 5 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Okay – now you're sounding like me. The only nagging thought I've got is both cats will have small content. Once I get to GG#10, I'm not doing any more. The pipesorting used for the gazettes kept them all in order, and grouped, so I didn't know which way to lean... Thanks.


 * Here, have a present of sorts :-) 1635: The King of Bohemia, and I'm co-authoring it with Mike Spehar. { ci te web|url=http://blogcritics.org/archives/2005/05/04/020414.php|accessdate=2007-10-04|quote=Finally, I have a contract to do what amounts to a sequel to my short novel "The Wallenstein Gambit" (which appeared in Ring of Fire). The title of it is 1635: The King of Bohemia, and I'm co-authoring it with Mike Spehar.|date=Published May 04, 2005}} (just happened to be in the cut buffer! Thanks


 * BTW- how did you ever get the firm idea Bohemia is eastern Europe? I ask, as the way I'm reading the tea leaves, Bohemia, Austria, Bavaria, and Franconia is the local of the second major thread, Russia, Poland, the eastern Baltic, seem to be missing in EFs planning so far as I can see so far. That makes the thread South and East Central Europe, in my reckoning. It also begs the question as to whether 'South Europe Thread' will include the balkans and/or Greece! But I digress! Cheers, and thanks! // Fra nkB 04:38, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Krakau
(You wrote)

I see no harm in it. It has been my experience that only unsecure nationalists prefer to deny that a city has been called by other names. I have no problem with admitting that Cracow is popular (if slightly more obsolete than Kraków), and that for most of 19th century, Krakau was often heard (and probably before, after all, many burghers were of German origin). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 19:02, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * POV warriors are far more resilient, than those of us who take interest in developing content. They get amused mostly by other users reaction to their extremism. For them Wikipedia is a “real-time” internet game with a peculiar quasi-encyclopedic twist. However, this is not why I joined in and I doubt if there’s a future for me here. Please take a look at some of the newest revisions to Kraków. They are absurd, like the merge-tag with History of Kraków, and the crippled new section destroying the lead. The deterioration of this article is so rapid, that I’m forced to wash my hands from it altogether. --Poeticbent talk  16:45, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

WP:LAME
Personally, I think this one is right there with the Kiev/Kyiv dispute, but I'm reluctant to add "current" wars, and I definitely agree the write-up is unacceptably one-sided. Circeus 04:12, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I did not compare it to That City (I think we should all instances of the name with "That City", wouldn't that solve everything?) for a reason . Circeus 15:14, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Jewish Bolshevism
Dear Piotrus,
 * My Russian is insufficient to evaluate External link/(Source) #10 that an editor refers to in the above. For your convenience I reproduce it here: . Can you tell me something about it? What kind of source is it? What does it say, more or less, and who is the author? Thank you, and have a nice day. --Ludvikus 14:59, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I believed you knew Polish. So I hoped you also knew Russian, because Poland was under Soviet control in the last half of the previous century. --Ludvikus 16:46, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Ghetto Benches
Dear Piotrus,
 * I happen to speak Polish. My family come from the Polish Ukraine (before WWII). I never heard of this usage until to brought it to my attention today. I really do not know anything about it - except what I'm reading here now. But you can imagine what goes through my mind if you think of Nazi Germans setting up special seating places which they might call "Warsaw benches" (where only Poles could sit). --Ludvikus 20:29, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Shouldn't it be "Getta" - the possessive? Doesn't it mean a bench from the Ghetto? --Ludvikus 20:59, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * "Bench ghetto(S)" makes no sense to my ear in Englsh. A "Ghetto bench" would mean a bench from the ghetto. But what does it mean to qualify the "bench" with "ghetto"? Is the bench supposed to be a "little ghetto"? --Ludvikus 21:07, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * But you still didn't answer my question: What's the Polish possessive for "ghetto"?
 * A bench which belongs to the ghetto? I cannot think of any Polish form but "getta" for the possessive. If you know another please tell me. I know that "ghetto" isc an Italian word. --Ludvikus 21:12, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Good work, Piotrus. You got 18 hits on Google. Notice the use of quotation marks (or scare quotes). So it does seem to mean a kind of mini-ghetto. --Ludvikus 21:18, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XIX (September 2007)
Delivered by grafikbot 13:34, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Re: Notability
I think that anybody included in PWN is notable. What's your criteria for the 'not notable' in your lists? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 19:51, 7 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't import biographies which seems to fails WP:BIO criteria or there is no assertion of notability in PWN article. Visor 15:22, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Subcategory:Antisemites
You had a great idea - and I now realize that that's all I really need. Furthermore it should be a Subcategory. Will you please support my latest proposal - since it's really your - I'm only qualifying it as a Subcategory of Antisemitism. --Ludvikus 00:48, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Jerzy Jan Lerski
Nice work on Lerski! Best to you, Piotrus. --Ludvikus 12:07, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

PLC as a confederation
Sure, if we would consider this talk of yours as a printed article - we might accept your view. User:Nihil novi suggested another view, that I do fully support. This one man show, you did on a PLC talk page - well it's a nice expertise, but hardly can be called a compromise. Confederal means - that orders issued by the central government could be blocked by local authorities. If you're interested you can find an further evaluation of this on your favorite Google books--Lokyz 19:12, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Polish logic
I hope I have not offended you. The above really deserves an Article:.
 * It's Mikka that I find extremely provocative. He thinks he can make up any titles he wishes (original research) and write an article about that (more original research). Cheers. --Ludvikus 05:53, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Misleading boilerplate suggestions
I have commented on your misleading suggestions at Talk:Belarus. Well, one of them, anyway, maybe I'll look at the rest, too. Gene Nygaard 18:06, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia Weekly
A couple new episodes - we're posting the infobox to save duplicating info.



Onsite · Offsite Subscription · Feedback

For the podcast crew – Tawkerbot 20:30, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

1632-verse matters
I've been away for a bit (Yes I remember the above exchange too! ), but fixed up 1632_Editorial_Board some today and stubbed in Ring of Fire II. Can you find the time to proof me and add anything you know. I've been unable to do much browsing in Baen's Bar or Erics site since forever... (Christmas, I think!) and don't get the new Gazettes either (I'm gonna change THAT)!

Wouldn't mind some help with 1632 characters/places/institutions etc. either. Keep an eye on too. I'm going to be giving these pages a lot of work the next few weeks if my plans work out, complete with page cites (e.g. See Cite 1633pb, et. al.). Having characters up will ease writing synopses significantly, I think. Have a go at Mike Stearns and John Chandler Simpson in your spare time!  Hope your studies are going well! Thanks // Fra nkB 21:00, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

First Look: The Economist Debate and Expert for Monday Launch
Hi Piotr,

Thanks so much for following the new Economist Debate Series and encouraging your readers to participate in what is sure to be a lively discussion about global education issues.

As a blogger and member of the education and technology community, we wanted to tip you off to what will happen on Monday, when we kick off the series with opening arguments.

• The Winning Debate: The community has spoken! The three winning propositions have been determined by popular vote, and our first debate on proposition #1 begins on October 15th. “This house believes that the continuing introduction of new technologies and new media adds little to the quality of most education.”

• Expert Debaters: Two global thought leaders in technology and education will square off on either side of the issue.

SIR JOHN DANIELS (AGREE) - President and Chief Executive Officer of The Commonwealth of Learning. vs.

Dr. Robert Kozma (DISAGREE) - Emeritus Director and Principal Scientist at SRI International (formerly known as Stanford Research Institute).

Other leaders in global education and technology have signed on to be guest participants through the course of the debate, so check back regularly to see your colleagues and friends examine the issues and deliberate from the virtual, online floor. We encourage you and your readers to participate as well.

Please support discourse, and may intelligence prevail!

Jeff & The Economist Team

Jeff Koo sparkpr | P 415.321.1866 | jeff@sparkpr.com | Skype Jeff.Koo —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.28.92.199 (talk) 01:50, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Re: Poznań 1956 protests
I would think so, given the military participation in the events. Kirill 05:25, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Adminship nom
Wanted to drop you a line and let you know that I answered your question at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Wisdom89 Thank you for taking the time to contribute and observe the process. I appreciate it. Cheers! Wisdom89 05:54, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

My RfA
Hi,

I've literally only just seen your question on my RfA - as your watchlist will tell you, it has just closed succesfuly and been archived. Even though it will make no difference now, I should say that, for the record, yes, I will immediatly add myself to that cat. If anyone was to feel that there was a problem with my adminship, I'd like it sorted out, and, if (god forbid) I really was doing a bad job, then I'd rather be desysoped than hold that as I could keep the tools I should. Blood Red Sandman (Talk)   (Contribs) 18:03, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Well, I'm going to thank you anyway, since you tried your best to contribute properly, and it's really my fault that your question was left hanging.

Polish notation vs. Prefix notation
Furthermore, Google shows us the former is far more common.
 * As a formal student of Philosophy and Logic in the United States, I have always known this subject by its former name.
 * Accordingly, I'm recommending that the Title of this Article be changed to the former. Yours truly, --Ludvikus 00:08, 13 October 2007 (UTC)


 * 76,900 Google hits for "Prefix notation": . --Ludvikus 00:14, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 155,000 Google hits for "Polish notation": --Ludvikus 00:17, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

I'm going to try to get the Article changed - to its more common name. Poland deserves credit for its great positive work, especial when the work carries its name. Cheers. --Ludvikus 00:23, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

My RfA
Just letting you know there's a couple of responses for you on my RfA. Out of interest, will you oppose every user from now, who says that they will not add themselves to RECALL? Cheers, Dfrg.msc 10:10, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Agnieszka Arnold
You're a Polish wikipedian I have particular respect for.
 * That said, I'd like you to know that the above is a contemporay Polish jounalist I also respect, and I've started a stub on this person. Any help would be appreciated. Cheers, --Ludvikus 17:12, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Translation
Could you pls translate this for me? Thx.

''Pomnik odslonieto 19 czerwca 2005 r.w 800-lecie bitwy pod Zawichostem. Fundatorem pomnika poswieconego pamieci ofiar bitwy i majacego godzic oba narody polski i ukrainski byla Gmina Zawichost w imieniu mieszkanców Gminy.

Tekst napisu na pomniku:

D.O.M.

"Niech Pan udzieli mocy swojemu ludowi, niech Pan blogoslawi swój lud, darzac go pokojem"  - Psalm 29,11 "Ale teraz w Chrystusie Jezusie wy, którzy niegdys byliscie daleko, staliscie sie bliscy przez krew Chrystusa. On bowiem jest naszym pokojem. On, który obie czesci uczynil jednoscia, bo zburzyl rozdzielajacy je mur - wrogosc" - z 2 listu sw.Pawla do Efezjan, wers 13-14. W 800 letnia rocznice bitwy pod Zawichostem 19.VI.1205 r. Mieszkancy A.D.2005''

--Thus Spake Anittas 15:42, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, I guess you missed the other part of the translation, but that's better than nothing. thx. --Thus Spake Anittas 07:46, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Gunnar S. Paulsson. Secret City: The Hidden Jews of Warsaw, 1940-1945
Thank you. It does look like an interesting book, and has a good review on H-Net Reviews. But I'm surprised the author does not have his own WP Article.
 * But I find the topic of the Holocaust too depressing to read. Also, I do not find it very interesting in studying demographics of any sort.
 * Right now I'm interested in The Jewish Bolshevism vs. Jewish Bolshevism.
 * The best to you, Piotrus.

PS: I'm surprised by the two Red items above. --Ludvikus 12:27, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

GAC discussion
Try looking at how other editors with a Good Article candidate handled discussions with reviewers. I can't personally remember any others I have been involved with that necessitated the amount of discussion and argument that I saw on the Kien Expedition discussion page. This was an exceptional case, hence my impression (accurate or not) of your attitude. Tim Vickers 23:20, 14 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Well that was my honest impression of how you acted. I might very well have been mistaken, but that's really all I can say - that's how you came across. Tim Vickers 23:39, 14 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I read through the discussion and I've reworded my comment to try to assume good faith. Tim Vickers 00:29, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

DYK!
Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 (talk) 06:05, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

A mistake again - Sorry
Dear Piotr:

A couple of weeks ago the User:BetacommandBot send me back the Image:Herb Holownia.PNG, it seems I did a mistake in the license. It should be GDFL-cc-2.5 and I added a Fair use tag I do not know why. It is a Tadeusz Gajl´s work uploaded by Emax time ago with a mistake in the name. He put Holowina instead of Holownia. I do not remember why I did the mistake, may be I was drunk this day, since I am a Polish-Uruguayan (it is a joke).

I did the same thing with Image:Herb Brochwicz.jpg time ago without any problem. (The proper name was Brochwicz and was uploaded erroneously as Brochowich) Anyway I do not know how to repair the damage. There is a proper version Image:POL COA Hołownia.svg already available so may be no important to keep or to delete this one.

May you take care of this matter?

Regards, thanks and sorry. --Gustavo 06:07, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 15th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 10:01, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Source for numbers
(You wrote)

What was your source for ? Those numbers need to be properly cited.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 18:26, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Not all originated from the same source I'm afraid, but the ones I used for the update came from a graph posted at www.stat.gov.pl (PDF small download) cited already.


 * PS : I realize that the above reference was removed as part of Jotel’s push and shove editing approach. Sorry about having to search through old edits in order to track me down. --<b style="font-family:Papyrus; color:darkblue;">Poeticbent</b> talk  20:24, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Polish operation of NKVD
Nie można się zgodzić, żeby biurokratyczny eufemizm był nazwą tej akcji. Proponuję, żeby podjąć akcję znalezienia dobrej nazwy.

Pozdrawiam

Cautious 09:28, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Żydokomuna
An article that you have been involved in editing, Żydokomuna, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you. IZAK 10:15, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Dear Piotrus

 * I don't know what your talking about. You, for one are an editor whom I respect. Please let me know exactly what you mean. I certainly do not think it's you? Best to you, Piotrus, I am --Ludvikus 16:51, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Please do not remove or change the AfD message until the issue is settled
Hi Piotrus: "Please do not remove or change the AfD message at the Żydokomuna page until the issue is settled" whether you like it or not it has been included in the Articles for deletion/The Jewish Bolshevism, where you are welcome and free to state your views. Thanks so much. IZAK 17:13, 17 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi, I just want to reiterate the message above. Both articles have been nominated for deletion together. If you feel that this was inappropriate or that one article has merit and not the other, please discuss your views at Articles for deletion/The Jewish Bolshevism. Please do not remove or change the AfD template appearing in the article. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's WP:Deletion policy and can result in loss of editing privileges. Once again, please express any objections you have to this nomination by joining the discussion at Articles for deletion/The Jewish Bolshevism. Best, --Shirahadasha 23:05, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Lubomirski
To na 100 % Benedykt Lubomirski, o czymświadczy łaciński napis w ramce Ben Lub_nsis Georg Lubom pal Cracow filius Benedykt Lubomirski syn wojewody krakowskiego Jerzego Lubomirskiego. Jego ojcem był wojewoda Jerzy Dominik Lubomirski. Trzeba jak najszybciej skasować Mokronowskiego. pozdrawiam Mathiasrex 22:35, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Kpalion's GG number
Hi, my GG number is 6023893. Please feel free to contact me at any time. Cheers – Kpalion(talk) 23:03, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Kiev Expedition (1018)
I was going to review this GA nominee, but seeing that you've been waiting for a copyeditor for it, I'll do that instead. This will disqualify me from GA reviewing it, however. JKBrooks85 18:36, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I think an infobox might be helpful in filling the top right-hand corner of the article. You could move the map picture up as the image header for it, and I think it would look very nice. JKBrooks85 18:53, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Roger that. Having gone through the process myself, I completely understand. JKBrooks85 20:54, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I've finished copyediting the article. There's a few unclear areas, particularly in the latter sections of the article dealing with Boleslaw's retreat from Kiev and the return of Yaroslav to Kiev, and I hesitated to make any changes that weren't supported by the text. Someone else moved the pictures to the left side... I think they looked better on the right, but that's just me. I'd still support putting an infobox with the basic information at the top. I really like infoboxes as a way of giving basic information to a reader unfamiliar with the subject, and that map would make a great image header. Hope it passes the GA review.JKBrooks85 15:01, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd be happy to read over the Pilsudski article. Though I'm admittedly not sure that copyediting the article absolutely disqualifies me from judging the article, I'd rather not take the chance of opening myself up to accusations of favoritism. There's what, several million registered editors? You'd think it wouldn't be that hard to find someone to do a GA review. JKBrooks85 19:29, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Amazing
As long as there is ignorance, we will continue to be amazed. We can only hope to be a little less amazed each day.PētersV 02:35, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

On your "Warning" advise
Dear Poitrus,
 * Upon your recommendation, I've contacted both editors.
 * I've offerred to make peace with them - you can read what I said on each of their Talk pages.
 * Unfortunately, I've had no response from either.
 * What do you think about that?
 * Yours truly, --Ludvikus 05:45, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Polish Corridor
Hi Piotrus, what do you think about this. Little notice about the novel is far enough I think. Citing or self-interpretation of the novel or claiming it as an international view is little bit out of topic. What do you mean?  ≈Tulkolahten≈ ≈talk≈ 08:08, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Stefan Fedak
Hello, I have one further question about Stefan Fedak, the attempted assassin of Pilsudski. Are you sure he was OVU and not a member of one of the other groups that went on to form the OUN? Thanks, Ostap 21:00, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
 * No, not controversial, I am just curious myself. I will look around for info about him and try to get to creating it.  Thanks again, Ostap 21:04, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kiev Expedition (1018)
The article Kiev Expedition (1018) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. It hasn't failed because it's basically a good article, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Kiev Expedition (1018) for things needed to be addressed. Victor12 21:56, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

re:Henryk Józewski
Tomorrow I will research and try to add some to it. The article looks very thorough. I will do my best. thanks, Ostap 04:32, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Occupations 1918-1922
Hello, I was researching the subject Soviet occupations, and added information about Soviet occupation of Korea and Bulgaria already to the list. Look at the talk page. It seems to me that the article is quite comprehensive now as of World War II -> Cold War. It may miss the brief Soviet occupations of Japanese territories and Norway, but otherwise.

The period which now needs more information is pre-World War II. There are books in Google books which use the term "Soviet occupation of Ukraine ~1920" and so. I have no background information on the 1920 Polish-Soviet War & Ukraine, so it's hard for me to look write about it. Did the Soviets occupy parts of Poland during the war? A particular interest is also Mongolian People's Republic from the 1920s, as many sources refer it as Soviet occupation also. Then the article should be pretty much covering all Soviet occupations, though Yugoslavia in World War II should be looked at also. --Pudeo⺮ 11:00, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

another question
Sorry to keep bothering you, but should the articels Polish minority in Ukraine and Ukrainian minority in Poland be titled "Poles in Ukraine" and "Ukrainians in Poland", following the lead of Russians in Ukraine and Ukrainians in Russia and so on? Also, are these articles going to include content on the history of said minorities, such as Ukrainians in Polish commonwealth and the like? If you read over Russians in Ukraine or the other article, they are very developed and go into demographics and history. Or are they just about recent census and events? Thanks, Ostap 18:47, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Ohio university sociology wikiproject articles
Sure- I can reply here. I have a list of the projects, linked on my user page. The students are in charge of updating links to their article and to their own userpages under the corresponding page, and many of them have followed through on that so far. I will ask them to add the school project tag to their article talk pages. I am dismayed to hear about the speedy deletion of the Causation and study design page, but I am sure that it can be resolved. In general I think the students are taking the task seriously and are contributing value. We tried to identify stubs for them to start with, although some topics like Social roles and Roles (Sociological theory) are overlapping, and in my initial search I only found the former. Nonetheless even the moderately developed articles tend to be entirely divorced from actual research on the topic, so connecting to that research remains an important contribution for the students to make. I expect that we will continue to experience some bumps in terms of formatting and procedures for the next week or so as the 120 students get up to speed on basic Wikipedia practice. But in that process, I can convey any suggestions or help that seems sufficiently general to warrant broadcast. Thanks again for your help.--Htw3 19:24, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! Both of my fall courses are participating, Intro with 98 students and Methods with 22. I guess we have about 28? projects under way, with 3 to 5 students per article. I found topics by looking through the list of stubs in the Sociology WikiProject and by looking through the textbooks I was using for the courses. I then searched for the articles on those topics looking for topics that were stubs, missing or otherwise needed a great deal of work. I asked students to name three topics from this list that they were interested in, but there was a great deal of overlap, so I had to match most of the groups up with topics myself. Fortunately for us, there are plenty of important and interesting topics with little or no development in the sociology domain of Wikipedia. A number of the pages are moving along nicely and I expect that several will be quite good by late November.--Htw3 20:32, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Sorted
 ≈Tulkolahten≈ ≈talk≈ 23:21, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Obrazki
Proszę skasować: ,, , , , , , , , , , , , . Dzięki. - Darwinek 21:58, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Juliusz Nowina-Sokolnicki
Co zrobić z ciągłymi wandalizmami w tym artykule? Pibwl &larr;&laquo; 23:48, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Warning:Javascript security issue
Hi! I need to inform you that I've protected Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/Fix lowercase first letter problem because it allows users to add code to the javascript of other users. If you are an admin, you are still able to edit it, but if you are not an admin, please copy and paste it into your userspace to continue modifying it. We can set up a message at the old javascript page telling users to change their links. If you need help, please contact me or User:Eagle_101. Thanks, --uǝʌǝs ʎʇɹnoɟʇs 00:18, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Warning:Javascript security issue
Hi! I need to inform you that I've protected Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/Add toolbox link because it allows users to add code to the javascript of other users. If you are an admin, you are still able to edit it, but if you are not an admin, please copy and paste it into your userspace to continue modifying it. We can set up a message at the old javascript page telling users to change their links. If you need help, please contact me or User:Eagle_101. Thanks, --uǝʌǝs ʎʇɹnoɟʇs 00:18, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Warning:Javascript security issue
Hi! I need to inform you that I've protected Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/Add tab because it allows users to add code to the javascript of other users. If you are an admin, you are still able to edit it, but if you are not an admin, please copy and paste it into your userspace to continue modifying it. We can set up a message at the old javascript page telling users to change their links. If you need help, please contact me or User:Eagle_101. Thanks, --uǝʌǝs ʎʇɹnoɟʇs 00:19, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Warning:Javascript security issue
Hi! I need to inform you that I've protected Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/Add edit section 0 because it allows users to add code to the javascript of other users. If you are an admin, you are still able to edit it, but if you are not an admin, please copy and paste it into your userspace to continue modifying it. We can set up a message at the old javascript page telling users to change their links. If you need help, please contact me or User:Eagle_101. Thanks, --uǝʌǝs ʎʇɹnoɟʇs 00:42, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Warning:Javascript security issue
Hi! I need to inform you that I've protected Wikipedia:WikiProject_User_scripts/Scripts/Add_LI_link because it allows users to add code to the javascript of other users. If you are an admin, you are still able to edit it, but if you are not an admin, please copy and paste it into your userspace to continue modifying it. We can set up a message at the old javascript page telling users to change their links. If you need help, please contact me or User:Eagle_101. Thanks, --uǝʌǝs ʎʇɹnoɟʇs 00:44, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Warning:Javascript security issue
Hi! I need to inform you that I've protected Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/Add purge to tabs because it allows users to add code to the javascript of other users. If you are an admin, you are still able to edit it, but if you are not an admin, please copy and paste it into your userspace to continue modifying it. We can set up a message at the old javascript page telling users to change their links. If you need help, please contact me or User:Eagle_101. Thanks, --uǝʌǝs ʎʇɹnoɟʇs 00:48, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Warning:Javascript security issue
Hi! I need to inform you that I've protected Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/Get Page Name because it allows users to add code to the javascript of other users. If you are an admin, you are still able to edit it, but if you are not an admin, please copy and paste it into your userspace to continue modifying it. We can set up a message at the old javascript page telling users to change their links. If you need help, please contact me or User:Eagle_101. Thanks, --uǝʌǝs ʎʇɹnoɟʇs 01:02, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Warning:Javascript security issue
Hi! I need to inform you that I've protected Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/Replace because it allows users to add code to the javascript of other users. If you are an admin, you are still able to edit it, but if you are not an admin, please copy and paste it into your userspace to continue modifying it. We can set up a message at the old javascript page telling users to change their links. If you need help, please contact me or User:Eagle_101. Thanks, --uǝʌǝs ʎʇɹnoɟʇs 01:04, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Wilhelm Koppe.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Wilhelm Koppe.JPG. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 01:06, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Warning:Javascript security issue
Hi! I need to inform you that I've protected User:Misza13/Scripts/Watchlist sorter because it allows users to add code to the javascript of other users. If you are an admin, you are still able to edit it, but if you are not an admin, please copy and paste it into your userspace to continue modifying it. We can set up a message at the old javascript page telling users to change their links. If you need help, please contact me or User:Eagle_101. Thanks, --uǝʌǝs ʎʇɹnoɟʇs 02:13, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

'Did you know' section
Your request on Hungarian Wikipedians' notice board has been answered by another user. Meanwhile I decided to take a look at your user page and I almost missed the otherwise very interesting and informative 'Did you know' section at the bottom. Maybe a little hint or a link at the top of the page would help others to find it easier. Squash Racket 06:01, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Notice
Hi, I am not sure if you know this but it is an arbitration case where your name is mentioned severally.  ≈Tulkolahten≈ ≈talk≈ 08:53, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Kraków GAC
(Your wrote)

Kraków received another batch of GAC comments. If we can address them, we should be able to GA it successfully. Are you up to it? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 17:01, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I suppose you're referring to this edit, right? I'll take a look at it within the next couple of days. Thanks. --<b style="font-family:Papyrus; color:darkblue;">Poeticbent</b> talk  19:11, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Herby w Muzeum Diecezjalne
Dear Piotr:

I am browsing through your photos from the Jan Dlugosz´s house. There are several coats of arms in tapestries, coffins and paintings. Two of them quite clear, the others will give me some work. I will try to take as much profits as I can. Thank you for remember me. I am going to ask you some information about them.

Right now I am getting a problem with the license of, I uploaded it in July 2006, I had get it from Emax´s work. He edited this image in December 2004 in PD tag. But now this tag needs updating and Emax is not active currently. Do you know what can I do?

Truly thanks

--Gustavo 06:11, 22 October 2007 (UTC)


 * : Dear Piotr:

You fixed Image:Stanislaw Antoni Szczuka.jpg in en:wiki and commons immediately! Oh thanks!

I am just starting with w:commons:Category:Coats of arms of families of Poland in Diocesan Museum in Sandomierz, I did the easy ones. The is really something, the coat of arms is quarterly with an innescutcheon. It is not clear enough, but it has two crests, one is Topor (may be the Starykon crest too) so the innescutcheon must be the axe of Topor (or the horse of Starykon - but I believe it is an axe). The innescutcheon seems to be party per pale also but I do not see it clearly. The second crest is not very clear neither. Do you remember something more about the drawing? Do you know to whom did belong this coat of arms?

I did an interesting description in the coat of arms of Olesko castle (and town) already. I would like to do the same thing.

I will try to detail the coats of arms from pictures. I will write you again about them. Regards.

--Gustavo 05:51, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Elections
Dear Piotr, I'm curious about your reaction to the Polish elections. A positive development?

Sca 14:31, 23 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Just curious about your opinion re Kaczynskis vs. Tusk. Sca 18:20, 23 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Ditto. He seems quite reasonable. Sca 00:23, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Snarki
I am the designer/programmer of GlobeGnome.com. I received a request to help out with the Snarki wikipedia page. How can I help? Also, if you can help me out on GlobeGnome.com (Register, see what the site has to offer and contribute if you want to), it will be greatly appreciated. Thank you so much.

Shaun

H0ttamale2 02:45, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

RfA question
Thanks for expressing a question in my RfA, however, the question you asked has already been posted and replied to a few days ago. Thanks anyway, Rudget Contributions 19:28, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Your show/hide JS boxes
Hello. Would you mind if I copied your code for those JavaScript containers to use them too? ~ | twsx | talkcont | 22:55, 24 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks a bunch, i will. ~ | twsx | talkcont | 06:55, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Majorities and minorities
In certain times and places certain groups of people happen to seize control over some rather small area and start imposing their "majority" views there by all means possible. But as time flies by "majorities" quite often turn out to be nothing but marginal dead end of evolution as we know from multiple examples from not so distant historical times. Anyway good look to you. Carpe diem Prokonsul. As for discussing things - my arguments are present on related talk page and I have no intention repeating them time and time again. I would not get dragged into this filibuster. I'd rather spend my time writing new articles. Cheers. M0RD00R 11:19, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Before restoring see history page
Next time before restoring "comments" investigate history  , thank you. P.S it is sad that stalking messages you describe as perfectly normal message. M.K. 19:13, 25 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Your assistance to the 83 IP, a well-known user who edited in the past as Truthseeker/Ksenon/Reichenbach/Litwa/etc sends him a wrong message of encouragement. Unless encouraging him to harass MK is indeed your intention. --Irpen 19:33, 25 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Hello Irpen, you are wrong. I have never heard of Truthseeker/Ksenon/Reichenbach/Litwa, whoever they are/were. I'm just a normal Pole who knows English and who reads WP:PRWNB. AFAIR registered users' IP adressess are logged in Wikipedia database. You can ask someone (I'm not sure who, I'm not so aware of Wiki) to public those adressess and compare them to my current one. Regards. 83.6.6.231 20:35, 25 October 2007 (UTC)


 * And BTW, I don't know Piotrus, I have never talked with him. Answer to your next question: I came here through MK contributions. 83.6.6.231 20:38, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

RfD
Some of your redirects are being discussed at Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 October 25 – Operacja wileńska → Operation Wilno, Operacja wilenska → Operation Wilno, and Wilno offensive → Vilna offensive. You may wish to comment. DGG (talk) 07:23, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Sikorski Kukiel WSC Raczyns 1940s.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Sikorski Kukiel WSC Raczyns 1940s.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Pagra shtak  19:14, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Sikorski funeral 1943.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Sikorski funeral 1943.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Pagra shtak  19:14, 27 October 2007 (UTC)