Talk:343 Industries

Comments
I'm basically the founder of this article, just letting everyone know, cause I'm special, and yeah...no need to thank me 343, I'll take that job as wikipedia article editor.Nex Carnifex (talk) 02:10, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

I have the logo, I just can't upload it. Can someone else? I found it here. Uploader49 (talk) 11:57, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Employees
So I just checked the source for the number of employees and the source cites 450 and not 750 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2800:4000:1100:842B:2DD7:F279:D70D (talk) 04:43, 17 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the heads-up. This was apparently vandalized last year. Should be fixed now. IceWelder  &#91; &#9993; &#93; 07:48, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Notability
I don't see how this thing isn't notable, it's the future producer of the triple A Halo franchise, and this has been confirmed. If you go to there website you can see they're already hiring.NexCarnifex (talk) 22:34, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually it isn't produced a Halo game to date yet, but it's notable because it will be making it into the future though. IRWolfie- (talk) 19:48, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I didn't say it had, but the fact it will makes it notable.Nex Carnifex (talk) 21:23, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Anyone hear anything about their next project?
We should add something about speculation of their next project, and it can be updated from there. I come to Wikipedia to keep up to date with things like this, but that includes the speculation in the news. Nex Carnifex (talk) 14:16, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Personally, as 343i has not stated a single bit about their 10-year anniversary events other than the fact that they will have one, its pointless to have any information on the article leading people to believe that there will be a game out on that day. While the likeliness of such information is popular and wanted, its nonetheless unofficial. The only game-related content that should be added is the fact that they've been hiring for game developer positions on an unnamed and unannounced title. Tonster (talk)

Should Halo Waypoint have a section in this article?
I think it deserves a solid paragraph about it on Wikipedia, maybe not an entire article, but this page also should be the redirect for Halo Waypoint, it would just make more sense. Nex Carnifex (talk) 01:09, 3 May 2011 (UTC)


 * ...It seems like there used to be a section for it, given all the links that point to a Halo Waypoint section on this page, but it appears to be gone. --V2Blast (talk) 04:17, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

We could certainly use more references
There are tons of articles about 343 on Google News, if anyone has the time you could reference this article much better.Nex Carnifex (talk) 13:23, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Current Projects section
Should the current projects section be titled that? Because most, if not all of the stuff in that section currently are old projects, and I don't see Halo V anywhere in current projects.

2014 Game
I just edited the 2014 game section of the table; there is currently no evidence for the 2014 game being anything related to "Halo 5". Most evidence in fact points to it being Halo 2 Anniversary (patents, interviews etc.). I don't think conjecture has a place here, that's all.

Regards, Sam. Samcooke343 (talk) 13:24, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Master Chief Collection in the "developed by 343" category?
When looking at the companies that worked on the collection, is it really accurate to say that 343 developed it? It would seem more fitting in the "contributed" category, as 3 out of the 4 games were made by Bungie, the remastered Halo: CE and Halo 2 campaigns were done by Sabre, Halo 2A cutscenes by Blur, the interface was done by United Front, the remastered Halo 2 multiplayer done by Certain Affinity, and the Halo 3 and 4 ports done by Ruffian. The amount of work that 343 would have done is far less than an actual developed game, and seems far more fitting with "contributed". Xl.Sean (talk) 11:15, 1 January 2015 (UTC)


 * The Master Chief Collection as a whole has to have a primary developer, and it wouldn't be fitting to say Bungie, Blur, Sabre, or any other company. While a lot of that work wasn't done specifically by 343i, that doesn't change the fact that they were the head of the project and are cited as the primary developer in reliable sources. I understand where you're coming from, but I think it is well-documented in the game article who contributed to each piece that makes up the collection, and that's really where that information (or controversy from your perspective) belongs. Here we are giving credit to the studio that released the game, regardless if they merely delegated a lot of the work. --GoneIn60 (talk) 19:18, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Agree with Gone here. "Developed" can be a very precise or very broad role, and in this case 343 oversaw the entire project and championed it to fruition, even if many of its constituent parts were produced by other companies. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 19:59, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I see where you guys are coming from. Maybe it would work in the notes for the Master Chief Collection, something like "The collection was also a culmination of work from a multitude of studios." That would still add in that it was not completely from one company while not detracting from the overall subject, and much like how the other games have similar notes. Xl.Sean (talk) 11:00, 3 January 2015 (UTC)


 * I would be fine with that. Cross out "also" and add "including 343i who oversaw the project's overall development" or something along those lines. --GoneIn60 (talk) 04:51, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Added the line in. Xl.Sean (talk) 07:37, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

343 doesn't care about community
They only answer to Microsoft and its shareholders... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.228.150.209 (talk) 00:29, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Fully protected edit request on 20 June 2017
A protected redirect, Halo Waypoint needs redirect category (rcat) templates added, which will remove the redirect from. Please modify it as follows:


 * from this:


 * 1) REDIRECT 343 Industries


 * to this:


 * 1) REDIRECT 343 Industries

The Redirect category shell template is used to sort redirects into one or more categories. When pp-protected and/or pp-move suffice, the Redirect category shell template will detect the protection level(s) and categorize the redirect automatically. (Also, the categories will be automatically removed or changed when and if protection is lifted, raised or lowered.) Thank you in advance!  Paine Ellsworth  put'r there  16:01, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * WHEN YOU COPY & PASTE, PLEASE LEAVE THE SKIPPED LINE BLANK FOR READABILITY.
 * ✅ — xaosflux  Talk 02:09, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Much appreciated, xaosflux !   Paine Ellsworth   put'r there  12:17, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 343 Industries. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110708073222/http://gamer.blorge.com/2010/11/21/microsoft-hires-ex-pandemic-members-for-new-halo-game/ to http://gamer.blorge.com/2010/11/21/microsoft-hires-ex-pandemic-members-for-new-halo-game/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:41, 22 June 2017 (UTC) –  Paine Ellsworth   put'r there  12:59, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment
This article is the subject of an educational assignment supported by  the Wikipedia Ambassador Program.

The above message was substituted from by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:35, 2 January 2023 (UTC)