User talk:Ashot Arzumanyan

The discussion

 * You're not addressing the key issue: the "role account" was blocked for spam edits. Personal account or not, the spam edits cannot continue.  Promotional or WP:COI editing cannot occur.  Please address this issue. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 12:04, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: There was a hyperlink to my company website in the role account Psalm Tours which was not put for spamming or advertising reasons. Since we did not know that role account was a violation of rules, we put a hyperlink to the company website in the user page so that others might learn more about the owner of the role account if interested. I kindly request to unblock my personal account Ashot Arzumanyan and tell me if there are some actions I should avoid in the future. Thank you. --  Ashot  ( talk ) 18:30, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment on decline decision of Blueboy96: As far as I am aware Check User examines IPs. It is obvious that in my case the same internet connection should be used both for the role account Psalm Tours and the personal account Ashot Arzumanyan which was created by me right after the role account was blocked. --  Ashot  ( talk ) 06:40, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

unblock


 * Note: Versageek 's explanation on the case may also be found at talkpage here. --  Ashot  ( talk ) 16:26, 26 February 2010 (UTC)


 * I kindly request also to review my account's block on Commons. Thank you. --  Ashot  ( talk ) 05:53, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't know how successful you'll be on Commons, Ashot; you'll have to ask at your talk page there. Just because a Wikipedian is an administrator does not mean he edits, let alone possesses administrator rights, on Commons - they're two separate wikis. —Jeremy (v^_^v Boribori!) 09:22, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I asked for review several days ago, but have no news since then. In the meanwhile I need to put the ((OTRS pending)) note in some images so that they are not deleted on the February 27th. Thank you anyway. --  Ashot  ( talk ) 09:58, 26 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Do you have some alternate way to connect to the internet? Editors are generally not allowed to edit from open proxies. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 00:16, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't know if that makes a difference, but I login via secure connection and this doesn't help. Right now I don't have any alternative :(( --  Ashot  ( talk ) 05:03, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Is there still a pending request here? We cannot do anything on Commons - it's a different process that needs to be done there. I see autoblocks already removed - is something outstanding? ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 15:54, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi. The problem with Commons is now solved. Actually the pending request is to unblock 83.139.38.1, so that I am able to use my home internet connection for editing. --  Ashot  ( talk ) 17:18, 28 February 2010 (UTC)


 * The problem is that the proxy you are connecting through is openly accessible - there are two open ports on it - and it has been used abusively in the past. I'll contact the checkuser who placed the block to have her take a look at it, but for security reasons, editors are generally not permitted to edit Wikipedia while on an openly accessible proxy. More information can be found at WP:NOP. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 22:01, 2 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Ok, thanks. --  Ashot  ( talk ) 05:17, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

I have placed the unblock request on hold pending response from the blocking administrator. Unfortunately, we cannot do much as far as your unblock request on Commons is concerned as I don't think any of us who have commented on this page are administrators on Commons. –MuZemike 19:58, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Comment
This is a very severe case of WP:BITE. The editor falls foul of rules he didn't even know the existence of and the book is thrown at him. When these rules are pointed out, he is immediately co-operative.

The accusation against the "role account" Psalm Tours of "using Wikipedia for spam or advertising purposes" is a somewhat selective analysis. I've just looked through the first 70 or so edits of that account. There were just two questionable external links added, but a substantial amount of content, including articles and images. These article were then nominated for deletion with the following results:


 * Articles for deletion/Makravank Monastery - unanimous keep
 * Articles for deletion/Vaskenian Theological Academy - unanimous keep
 * Articles for deletion/Getik Baghdasarian - pending
 * Articles for deletion/Stepanavan Dendropark - unamimous keep
 * Articles for deletion/Baghdasar Arzoumanian - pending
 * Articles for deletion/Sebouh Chouldjian - unanimous keep
 * Articles for deletion/Horomayri Monastery - pending (unanimous keep so far)

A sockpuppet case was made against Psalm Tours because of an IP post to an AfD. There was no evidence of malintent, and no double voting. The edit merely provided useful information on alternate name spellings. Again, it seems the user was not aware of the rules and was given no warning about them.

This user shows every sign of being a valuable contributor of substantial and worthwhile content, and need to be helped and encouraged. The treatment meted out to him so far is rather less than exemplary.

 Ty  18:04, 28 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much for your time and trust. --  Ashot  ( talk ) 20:34, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Infobox Armenian Apostolic Church Diocese
Should be working properly now.  Kayau  Voting  IS   evil 11:07, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much! --  Ashot  ( talk ) 11:59, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Out of interest, why was infobox Diocese not sufficient? It is better to improve existing templates than to create entirely new ones for only a small number of articles. I can't see anything in Infobox Armenian Apostolic Church Diocese which makes it necessary to have this split. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:18, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Reply: There are a number of reasons, one of which is that it is designated for a Catholic Church diocese and most of information in that template does not fit the typical diocese of Armenian Church.--  Ashot  ( talk ) 16:53, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

National Competitiveness Report of Armenia
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of National Competitiveness Report of Armenia, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: National Competitiveness Report – Armenia (ACR). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:14, 26 December 2010 (UTC)


 * The issue is corrected, redirect is set. --  Ashot  ( talk ) 08:18, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

FYI
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give National Competitiveness Report – Armenia (ACR) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 23:54, 4 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Re: Thanks for your message. As far as I remember ACR is the only case and I realized that something is wrong some time later. Thanks for taking the time. --  Ashot  ( talk ) 08:18, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank
Thanks Ashot for your advice. What discuss page we are talking about? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aram-van (talk • contribs) 08:16, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Wikiquette
Hello,. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikiquette alerts regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.  Tuscumbia  (talk ) 15:18, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Armeniapedia.org
Ashot, Spartaz has a legitimate reason to remove Armeniapedia.org. He's applying the same principle of notability as to other articles on Wikipedia. It's nothing to get upset over. Those really concerned should have an article published about Armeniapedia in a newspaper or journal, and then the topic will have notability. That's the best solution. Serouj (talk) 21:19, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * No doubt about legitimacy of Spartaz's actions and agree with you about the best solution. But I guess we both know how useful Armeniapedia is. And if it is, then there should ways to reflect that with proper arguments. --  Ashot  ( talk ) 21:27, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, for Wikipedia it's not really whether Armeniapedia is useful or not, it's whether it is special in some way, and whether a credible source has written about that specialness, which would make it notable. A good question to ask would be "are there other culture-specific or nation-specific Wikis like Armeniapedia"? Maybe it deserves a mention in the Wiki article as an example of a culture-specific Wiki. Scribblescribblescribble (talk) 17:40, 15 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your suggestions and thoughts. You are right - there was no malice, but what was frustrating is that a couple of people who had probably never been to an Armenian website were the only ones who voted.  Anyway, I greatly appreciate the bibliography Ashot and agree a couple of articles would be helpful as well.  --RaffiKojian (talk) 00:27, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Heyvali (village)
I closed that discussion since there is no consensus to move. Reopening without something new is not likely to result in any consensus to move. Given the number of words written in the discussion without a consensus, I would recommend that you not submit it again. I realize that you feel strongly about the subject, but I don't see you having the support of other editors which would be need to get consensus for a move. Vegaswikian (talk) 06:44, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I can't stop you from having a discussion to try and reach a consensus. If you do that, just have a discussion on the talk page and if there is a consensus, then do another WP:RM at that time.  Vegaswikian (talk) 07:46, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * "You mention that there was no consensus for moving, but there wasn't also consensus on support for the current situation." Doesn't matter. In the absence of a consensus, we remain at the status quo. It doesn't mean, "keep fighting until there is a consensus." --Golbez (talk) 13:46, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Re:
Hmmm, yes, I agree. Even though one could say that the discussion on the Tsitsernvank is "ongoing", his edits on Gandzasar clearly constitute vandalism because they involve the removal of reliable sources, which plainly identify this monastery as Armenian, and highly contentious editing. You may wish to bring these points to the attention of Sandstein. Best, --Marshal Bagramyan (talk) 16:37, 4 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I've read it Ashot jan but I simply disagree with his assessment. A content dispute means that a legitimate dispute exists between two parties who both act in good-faith and introduce sources which are generally equal to one another in terms of reliability. Unfortunately, neither of those conditions are satisfied in Verman's contributions. His edits on Gandzasar are perhaps the most egregious, since he is actually deleting the sources and replacing them with unreliable websites and selectively using those which conform to his views. Even when he cites De Waal's book (2003), he neglects to mention the opinion of Robert Hewsen on the inscription and the concept of Albania at the time (quote from page 156): Finally we came to the Karabakhi prince, Hasan-Jalal. Professor Hewsen concluded that "I have found not a shred of evidence that [the meliks] ever thought of themselves as anything but Armenians, albeit members of the Albanian branch of the Armenian Church." If Verman still fails to see this and continues with his disruption, that's pretty much close to willful disruption. You may also wish to talk to User:Golbez about this, since he's very familiar with the matter, although I'd be careful because he can be cranky sometimes ;) Best, --Marshal Bagramyan (talk) 05:20, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

So is any admin doing anything about Verman1? Or are they all passing the buck?--Moosh88 (talk) 07:02, 6 April 2011 (UTC) I couldn't follow if the 3RR was violated, if so could you please file it? I'll try to ask one other admin to do something about him... --  Ashot  ( talk ) 08:54, 6 April 2011 (UTC)


 * He has now added two more articles to his list and has gone thru it to change the Armenian name to the Azeri one. I will look at the edits again.  I have never filed a 3RR report so it is new to me--Moosh88 (talk) 13:56, 6 April 2011 (UTC)


 * It's not just a matter of violating 3RR but just the persistent edit warring and disrespectful and flippant attitude toward Wikipedia's policies that is at fault. Even if he hasn't made three reverts in a single day, that still warrants some form of action because it is still edit warring, which is a sanctionable offense under ArbCom 2, which he is very well aware of.--Marshal Bagramyan (talk) 16:39, 6 April 2011 (UTC)


 * I agree, and has any action been taken thus far? I see that some of the pages have been protected but will this really end once the page protection expires?  I fear that Verman will not accept the wiki process...--Moosh88 (talk) 01:35, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

3RR Rule
You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Arbitration/Requests and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—
 * Arbitration/Requests;
 * Arbitration guide.

Thanks, --Verman1 (talk) 09:21, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

re
I'm not sure I care enough at this very moment. So if you want a resolution, you should look elsewhere. This isn't a slight against you, I just can't deal with the AA crap at this moment. --Golbez (talk) 16:26, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Re
Yes, I'm very familiar with him. For a while, there were strong indications that he was sockpuppeting and a neutral editor and administrator who is very knowledgeable and familiar with his edits is Buckshot06 so you may wish to turn him for help or guidance. Best, --Marshal Bagramyan (talk) 20:13, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Orontid Dynasty and Satrapy of Armenia articles
They are trying to remove further of our history, can you please explain and revert back to what was always there. 166.216.226.23 (talk) 08:41, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I am not an expert of the epoch. So please try to ask for advice from User:MarshallBagramyan, who I assume, is much more knowledgeable in the area.
 * And yes, why do you edit from an IP? --  Ashot  ( talk ) 09:01, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Look here in Marshall's talk page about the ancient sources. Phoenicians8 (talk) 17:18, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

First of all i'd suggest not to avoid examining his sources and trying to find more to back up our position. Everything will be ok.  Ashot  ( talk ) 19:19, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

May 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Stepanakert Airport. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. AgadaUrbanit (talk) 21:49, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * I reverted Neftchi's change since he changed a much discussed point in the text (certainly not a AGF edit). Please be kind to dedicate more time to research the case before making this kind of statements. Thanks. --  Ashot  ( talk ) 05:05, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

re
I took a very poorly-written paragraph and made it usable. I make no statement on if the information in it is quality; I just wanted to clean it up. So my edit of it should not be used to say I endorse it, if it turns out to be questionable on other grounds. --Golbez (talk) 16:31, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Response to your questions
Hello. I have already answered your question you posted on my talk page addressing your concerns you had already expressed in this report. So, there is no need for you to play around the subject. Instead, I would really like to see you post that kind of messages on MarshallBagramyan's page since he was the one dismissing and labeling Azeri authors based on ethnicity and place of residence. For future reference, please open a discussion on that issue elsewhere so that other editors can participate, since I had already addressed your concerns. Cheers, Angel670 talk  06:54, 29 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I did address your concern and I did ask you to post the same kind of message on MarshallBagramyan's page. Angel670 talk  16:46, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:08, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Bruce Doolin Henderson.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bruce Doolin Henderson.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:10, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Bruce_Doolin_Henderson.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Bruce_Doolin_Henderson.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? feydey (talk) 20:39, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Henderson photo
The fair use rationale needs to be filled in complete. feydey (talk) 07:49, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Fred-Gluck.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Fred-Gluck.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:06, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Bruce Doolin Henderson.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bruce Doolin Henderson.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. damiens.rf 15:39, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Greetings
Hello there! Sorry I was away to react on the articles here. I gave up, in fact, when I saw how poor the knowledge of admins is and the system, especially after the events on the Russian wikipedia (do not know if you know what I mean). I am here seldom and cannot be often anymore. But I would appreciate if you update me about and also keep me informed about what is going on here nowadays. I have even forgotten what e-mail I gave here.. Just changed it. You can write me there, ok? Regards, Aregakn (talk) 12:27, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:49, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:48, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Help to revert Karabakh Khanate
Help out they are reverting again to the false Azeri info on this article. 75.51.175.187 (talk) 05:30, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I am not very familiar with the sources and can't do a blind revert. I guess User:MarshallBagramyan is much more knowledgeable on the topic.
 * PS: I'd suggest that you stop editing from IP and sign up. --  Ashot  ( talk ) 05:43, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

User:Dighapet
An AE proceeding was launched against User:Dighapet. This may concern you since you were involved in editing articles with his participation. Gorzaim (talk) 00:33, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:14, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:55, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Marvin Bower Book Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Marvin Bower Book Cover.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:16, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Re:
I have. I posted it and re-listed it but no action whatsoever was taken. I'm thinking of re-listing it once more but what's the point if the administrators just continue to ignore it?--Marshal Bagramyan (talk) 16:29, 21 October 2011 (UTC)


 * You delete it from the archive, and then copy and paste it back onto the AE page (see the instructions here).--Marshal Bagramyan (talk) 17:09, 21 October 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't see why not. If you'd like, you can open a new complaint and simply state that mine was ignored, even after I re-listed it. I do agree, though - comments such as those are unacceptable and it's unfortunate that he has yet to understand that. If you need any help, please ask. Best, --Marshal Bagramyan (talk) 20:24, 22 October 2011 (UTC)


 * The stupid bot isn't supposed to archive but you can't blame it - it doesn't know better. Try following the steps I wrote above and mention that this is now the third time it is being re-listed. I will try to draw the attention of an administrator to it in the meantime.--Marshal Bagramyan (talk) 17:01, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:43, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:54, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:16, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Wiki-meet in Yerevan
Hi Ashot Arzumanyan. Armenian Wikipedia holds a wiki-meet this weekend. You can join if you are interested. Please see here for more details. --va c io 16:14, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:20, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

AE report filed by User:Grandmaster
User:Grandmaster has filed an AE report on Nagorno-Karabakh trying to limit participation in the article. Take a look as a user active on the article’s talk pages. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Nagorno-Karabakh_article Dehr (talk) 16:56, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:54, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Restricting access to users in Armenia-Azerbaijan
I would like to pick the brain of more experienced users about the ongoing exchange between [User:Grandmaster] and a couple of administrators. Grandmaster suggests to restrict access to some and potentially to all articles in Armenia-Azerbaijan by excluding new users. You can reply on my home page if you wish. Dehr (talk) 19:18, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:48, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:04, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:42, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:35, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:53, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)
Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page. In this issue: Read the entire first edition of The Olive Branch -->
 * Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
 * Research: The most recent DR data
 * Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
 * Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
 * DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
 * Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
 * Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

--The Olive Branch 18:49, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:54, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:17, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:11, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High. The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:09, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:


 * Views/Day : Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
 * Quality : Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:


 * Content : Is more content needed?
 * Headings : Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
 * Images : Is the number of illustrative images about right?
 * Links : Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
 * Sources : For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:55, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:


 * Views/Day : Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
 * Quality : Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:


 * Content : Is more content needed?
 * Headings : Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
 * Images : Is the number of illustrative images about right?
 * Links : Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
 * Sources : For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:58, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject World Heritage Sites
Hi Ashot, I’d like to help work on the World Heritage Sites WikiProject that you’re listed as a member on. I’m a student at American University and currently taking a “Wikipedia and Public Knowledge” class. We’ve been tasked to find and contribute to a WikiProject and this project caught my attention. I’m really interested in helping with your World Heritage Sites WikiProject, specifically the list of World Heritage Sites in Peru. I’ll be traveling to Cusco and Machu Picchu in the beginning of March so I’d love to add some photographs to the project when I return. Thanks. Mlhill23 (talk) 03:20, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Armenian help needed
Hello Ashot, I'm contacting you because we need some Armenian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on hy.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need assistance with a personal message for the Armenian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 16:47, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:00, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:47, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:22, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ACR 2010 eng cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:ACR 2010 eng cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:51, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ACR cover2011-2012eng.png
 Thanks for uploading File:ACR cover2011-2012eng.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:52, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ACR cover2013-2014.png
 Thanks for uploading File:ACR cover2013-2014.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:52, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Armenia Competitiveness Report 2008.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Armenia Competitiveness Report 2008.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:55, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Armenia Competitiveness Report 2009 English Cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Armenia Competitiveness Report 2009 English Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:56, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:10, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:45, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:14, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:48, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:46, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of EV Consulting for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article EV Consulting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/EV Consulting until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ysangkok (talk) 10:09, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Economy and Values Research Center


The article Economy and Values Research Center has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * notability not established

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ysangkok (talk) 10:09, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:EV Consulting logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:EV Consulting logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:EV Logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:EV Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland The 10,000 Challenge and WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 01:15, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:45, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:43, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:42, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Manuk Hergnyan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manuk Hergnyan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Manuk Hergnyan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 07:15, 21 December 2020 (UTC)