User talk:Leifern/Archive 3

Possible future articles
Olav Hoaas, the Feldmann case (possibly substituting the word "case" with "affair" or something) are topics that seem to fit in with your interests. Punkmorten (talk) 22:12, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The Feldmann case is definitely on my list, but it requires a bit of research as it ties in with the incident on Vestfoldbanen and the broader issue of legal culpability for crimes against the Jewish population of Norway during the war. (Nothing is ever as simple as it seems). I have other problems with Hoaas - although I think he's a despicable character, he was prosecuted for exercising free (though reprehensible) speech. An NPOV article can't address what he said without also dealing with the issue of whether he had a legal right to say it. Thanks for the pointers, in any event. --Leifern (talk) 22:19, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

DYK nomination
Hi. I've nominated Ruth Maier, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook for the article at Template talk:Did you know, where you can improve it if you see fit. It's always a pleasure to come across your work, something that seems to be happening more rarely now that you're making fewer New Jersey edits. This is a fascinating article you created. Please review the hooks I suggested for inclusion at DYK and modify as needed. Thanks, Alansohn (talk) 04:59, 23 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I found the article fascinating too, thanks! Royal broil  06:06, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Nice work, added this one also to Portal:Norway. Cirt (talk) 00:21, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

My Rfa
I wish to thank you for being supportive of my effort to regain my adminship. Though it was not successful, your support was still very much appreciated. Let me know if there is anything I can do for you. Thank you!--MONGO 06:28, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

WP:IPCOLL
Leifern, glad to read your thoughtful input today. I suggested ways to re-allocate your various ideas into some existing/new discussion sections, please give a look. (Or I can help you re-arrange it, if you let me know.) Thanks and baruch ha-ba. HG | Talk 16:04, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Nudge, nudge. Hi. I just posted a new discussion section to address the fine point that you raised in your initial post. However, I'd still like to see some of your comments re-allocated. Would you be willing to do it? I don't want all your ideas to be lost inthe forest. Thanks muchly. HG | Talk 20:34, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Notification of Arbitration Enforcement
I am copying this to you personally, as you are a major contributor to the Pallywood article.

Under the discretionary sanctions imposed at Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles, the Pallywood article has been placed on a one-revert rule. Any editor who makes more than one revert (and this revert must be discussed on the talk page) in a 7-day period will be blocked. Please edit cooperatively, and seek consensus and compromise rather than edit-war. ~ Kylu 01:06, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Pallywood
Please review the history of edits before applying "discretionary action." ChrisO made a number of unilateral edits based on his views; I reverted, asking for further discussion; he reverted back to his version and then went running to you to impose the restriction. Given that ChrisO insists on gutting the article to a meaningless version, I am inclined to put it up for deletion, anyway. This is a contentious topic, and the only way to avoid the appearance of taking sides is to investigate a matter before taking admin action. --Leifern (talk) 22:54, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm going to have to admit, I'm unable to grasp the concept of being belligierent to a complete stranger who is trying to keep involved parties abiding by arbitration remedies, especially those that may well result in blocks.
 * The 1RR restriction is for your own good: Without it, the Israel-Palestine related articles will likely have edit-war flareups and with it, numerous long-duration blocks and possibly longer article bans.
 * So, I feel a few notes are in order:
 * I don't know ChrisO from Adam. Really, to my knowledge he and I have never had a single interaction before now, on-wiki or off-wiki. I am not one of his "buddies on irc" and resent the implication. I am in no way interested in your view of the veracity of this statement, also, so feel free to keep your view to yourself in this regard.
 * The enforcement applies to all editors of the article, including ChrisO. How that's taking his side is beyond me.
 * The entire point of the enforcement is that it's a contentious topic. That's why it gets enforcement in the first place: If you don't grasp how the article is related to the Palestine-Israel arbcom case, please ask a different uninvolved admin for an explanation.
 * If you'd like the action reviewed, take it to one of the admin noticeboards, where I'm sure you'll get more attention on the topic than I'm both willing and able to offer.
 * Happily, I can say I did in fact review the edits before applying the enforcement. Oddly enough, I'm not in the habit of going to random articles and applying random arbcom enforcement rules to pages. Go figure.
 * I noticed that the most questionable edit is Chris's. Don't you think the 1RR restriction, therefore, actually hinders him more than it hinders you?
 * Before ever, ever reverting again, read Help:Reverting. I don't mean for "how to revert", but for reviewing the cases where reversion is appropriate. Notice the "DO NOT" section, and where it says "Do not simply revert changes that are made as part of a dispute. Be respectful to other editors, their contributions and their points of view." His edit was not vandalism, it was a dispute between you two on article content. Let me rephrase this: "If you revert a non-vandalism edit (as determined by the blocking admin) on this article, you will be blocked for a minimum of 24 hours."
 * Now, as far as your deletion suggestion goes, if you can point to someplace in our various deletion guidelines where the deletion is anything other than bad-faith, feel free to nominate the article on articles for deletion, but recall that WP:IDONTLIKEIT is not a good-faith nomination reason.
 * This reply is posted to both my talkpage and yours, along with your original edit. If you think it incivil, please suggest resolution, but otherwise, I'll thank you to kindly go about productive editing instead.
 * I hope that clears up the matter. I won't be watching your talkpage for replies. ~Kylu ( u | t )  23:33, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Please come back to Pallywod and help us work out some solutions. Palestinian news fraud is a real phenomenon.American Clio (talk) 23:38, 24 March 2008 (UTC)American Clio

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIII (January 2008)
The January 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:24, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator elections
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14! Kirill 03:29, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Khazars
Thanks for the message. Actually, I didn't edit any of the last references (If it looks as if I did, it must have happened inadvertendly). I only just added more refs to reflect the dearth of firm scholarly knowledge a Jewish-Byzantine relations (and in general about Byzantium) which has as a result a quite remarkable variety of opinions. I also deleted the precise quotations from Golden's and Graetz' books to save space and because I thought they were only inserted in response to my query about the sources. I don't mind restoring them. Schlcoh (talk) 17:10, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Schlcoh (talk) 18:10, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I left a similar message on the article Talk page: I agree with what you said there and I thought that the version on which we had kind of settled on yesterday satisfied these conditions. However, I see another user has reverted. I won't revert but I expect you or another of the editors who are more familiar with the discussion than Beit Or is, to restore the previous version.

doubler

 * Nice work! Added this WP:DYK to Portal:Norway. Cirt (talk) 00:21, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

The DYK item led me here...
...via the pages on Odd Nansen and Nansenhjelpen, an episode in Nazi-era history hitherto unknown to me (and many others, I'd think). I'd like to see these and what you've written on the Shoah in Norway translated for the Hebrew Wikipedia; I'll note this on the most closely relevant page there (i.e. Talk:Jewry of Norway#During the Holocaust). Meanwhile, kudos and thanks for your significant contributions! -- Cheers, Deborahjay (talk) 21:48, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Parks in Oslo
Hi, can you check in on Parks and open spaces in Oslo, I have started translating it to English, alas I am not that good and currently I need to find a translation for 1850-årene. Brgds - Ulflarsen (talk) 13:29, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi, thank you for converting my gulesider map links into coordinates. I would like to know how to make them - is there a place to read about it? The Halfdan Kjerulfs plass is a little unprecise, all the others are perfect. Helge Høi (talk) 20:32, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Milhist coordinators election has started

 * The February 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fifteen candidates.  Please vote here by February 28! --Eurocopter tigre (talk) 17:26, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Heinrich Fehlis
Hi, I'd appeciate it if you could add some sources to your article (not just for your last edit, "first poison, then shoot himself"). There hardly seems to be anything on the web about Fehlis, so maybe you could cite one or two books / articles. Thanks in advance, keep up the good work, and all the best,   17:18, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks!   21:16, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Brynjar Aa
Hi I was wondering if you could help save this article from deletion. Its currently up for afd. I;m certain something in Norwegian can be translated to expand it. I think it is notable but google is lacking. Could you consider seeing (this and This ) and try to expand it. Brynjar Å is also another form of the name. Could you help mate? ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦      $1,000,000? 13:48, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

You may not like the guy but is it possible you could add something and a reference to make it valid? If he is controversial I think this is interesting. Thanks  ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦       $1,000,000? 14:24, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

thanks
thanks for your help recently. By the way, i've been looking at your contribs. You're an interesting guy. i'm going to start reading up more here about the post-World War 2 history of Norway. didn't realize all this stuff happened there. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 15:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Agreement with Shirahadasha
Hi Leifern. Thanks for your attention. See User talk:Shirahadasha where I notify User 's agreeing to Shira's proposal at Requests for comment/IZAK2 (and I still hold by Requests for comment/IZAK2). What are your thoughts on the matter? Thanks. IZAK (talk) 16:42, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Endorsing new proposal
Hi Leifern: Thank you for giving this matter your serious attention. I wanted to let you know that I have now endorsed the latest "Proposed intermediate verdict 3.1" at Requests for comment/IZAK2. Thanks, IZAK (talk) 16:49, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Well-poisoning
Care to explain how switching the order of two paragraphs is "well-poisoning?" 

I was only trying to make the article conform to the WP:MOS, as well as common sense. I think you need to lay off the revert button, and try to be a little less hostile.  18:31, 27 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The introductory section of an article on charges of human rights violation is typically context-setting. In this case, the most important piece of context is that Israel is a liberal democracy in which minorities are protected, just like, say Norway, or Sweden. To state that human rights are a matter of ongoing discussion is a) self-evident, and b) begs the question and therefore constitutes well-poisoning. Correcting bias is not hostile. --Leifern (talk) 19:07, 27 February 2008 (UTC)


 * You think that's the most important piece of context. Others might think the ongoing occupation is the most important piece of context. Still others might think the most important piece of context is that Israel defines itself by religious identity. Still others might think something different.
 * It's interesting that you mention Norway or Sweden - I checked Human rights in Europe, and it begins, "The current human rights situation in Europe..." not "European states are multiparty parliamentary democracies..." In fact, I checked the first ten articles "Human rights in...x" and, of those that have any introduction at all, they all start along the lines of "The human rights situation in X is poor..." or "Human rights in Y have been analyzed by Z..." Why would Israel get special treatment?
 * You've switched from "well-poisoning" to "begging the question," which are two very different concepts. Which is it, and specifically, how would stating that NGO's and governments have looked into human rights in Israel in any way prejudge or bias? It seems to me that your problem is not with well-poisoning, but with failing to well-poison in the manner you favour (ie, by stating as prominently as possible that Israel is a democracy.)  19:21, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * So interesting that you only quoted the first few words about Europe, because it continues "is believed to be good." Begging the question is a rhetorical fallacy that may (or may not) serve to poison the well. Well-poisoning means to predispose the reader to a particular, unfavorable conclusion about what's coming next; which is precisely what begging the question is as well. "Occupation" does not apply to the situation in Israel, unless you believe that Gaza and the West Bank are part of Israel, which would certainly be to beg the question. Why should Israel get special treatment? Here's a sample of introductory sentences about countries with a government system similar to, or inferior to, Israel's:
 * The United Kingdom has a long and established tradition of avowed respect for its subjects' human rights.
 * Human rights in Finland are protected by extensive domestic safeguards, in addition to the country's active membership in most international human rights treaties.
 * Spain is a democracy with a constitutional monarch.
 * Human rights are comprehensively guaranteed in Switzerland, one of Europe's oldest democracies
 * You are the one who wants to make Israel a special case, not me. --Leifern (talk) 20:10, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Leifern, I'm going to copy this onto the article page and continue there.  06:39, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

DYK

 * Nice work on this one too, wow, do you have any other WP:DYKs related to Norway that aren't already listed at Portal:Norway/DYK? Cirt (talk) 00:25, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Oops, hehe, saw your list at the bottom of your userpage, will be adding those to Portal:Norway, thanks for your contributions over the years, these will really be nice additions to the portal! Cirt (talk) 00:31, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIV (February 2008)
The February 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:57, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

List of converts to Judaism
Thanks for participating in the discussion. I've responded to your first point in particular. Divamia (talk) 23:36, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

WTF
Holy cow, Leifern, this is way out of line. You challenged the wording of a sentence which was cited to a source which used the same wording. For your benefit, I added another footnote to the same reference, at exactly the spot where you had challenged it. And then I added, to the reference, the direct quote of the reference using the same wording. And then you remove it saying "Reference does not document the assertion, so I'm taking it out as an example of well-poisoning"! What gives, Leifern!?  17:31, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Just for the record, I deleted a sentence that perpetrated at least one rhetorical fallacy, namely that of an unsubstantiated generalization, or converse accident. The sentence implied that a term was only used by one group of individuals when the source stated that it was used by that group of individuals on one occassion. --Leifern (talk) 12:14, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Leifern, perhaps you can also help User:Eleland and me with this reading comprehension problem on the Palestinian people. Regards, Doright (talk) 05:16, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

DYK nomination

 * ...that Knut Rød, a Norwegian police inspector who arranged the deportation of over 500 Jews in 1942 was acquited after the war although no one denied he did it? by Leifern OK? Victuallers (talk) 16:35, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

DYK

 * Yet again, nice job, has been added to Portal:Norway. Cirt (talk) 22:28, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Disruption warning
Please do not restore the "petition" again to Reliable sources/Noticeboard. It is unnecessary, creates needless drama and is fundamentally misleading, as policy is not determined by a vote. Please bear in mind that you are not permitted to disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point and you may be blocked if you continue. -- ChrisO (talk) 02:22, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Chris, since you erased another one of my posts when you posted the above, I'll just repost what I posted there again here. (Did I use the word "post" enough times?)
 *  Chris, not only may you not block someone you are in a dispute with, you may not threaten to do so. You asked me to calm down. Will you not take your own advice? What you are doing is contrary to both the letter and the spirit of policy. IronDuke  02:37, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * ChrisO's accusations are absurd, and his threats abusive. --Leifern (talk) 20:56, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)
The March 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:50, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Template for former municipalities?
Has this template been created? -- Nidator T / C 10:44, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)
The April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:26, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Forced labor in Germany during World War II
Hi. I noticed Forced labor in Germany during World War II has been on hold for awhile at WP:GAN. How's the progress coming along? Should it be failed or passed? I'm trying to help empty the backlog over there, so I was just interested in the article's status. Thanks. Nikki 311 01:15, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Article about the white buses
Hi, the article about the White Buses is tagged, could you help in checking the article so the tag could be removed? It was originally written in Norwegian by me, and now it has been translated to several languages, would be good if the english version could be corrected so the tag could be removed. Best regards, Ulflarsen (talk) 10:39, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)
The May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:15, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Muhammad al-Durrah
Hello. I'm currently involved in a dispute about certain wording in the lead of this article with another editor, User:ChrisO. This user claims to be the originator of the phrase "reported to have been killed" with regards to al-Durrah, a phrase he now wants to change to 'was killed'. My own research on the editing history of this page leads me to think that it was actually you who first introduced this phrase into the lead, and that it subsequently remained in the article for more than two years. Perhaps you can comment in the Talk pages of the article and clarify who came up with this phrase, and what is the consensus regarding it. Canadian Monkey (talk) 01:42, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-06-17 Muhammad al-Durrah
Hello. I'm going to take over this MedCab case and try to work this stuff out. I posted in the talk page what I would like all participants to do to start. Hopefully this all works out well, I have zero intention of leaning towards any one side in this dispute, and I only care about getting it taken care of. Wizardman 18:53, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Tone
Hi, would you please consider rewording this (especially the first sentence) to a more civil tone? Thanks, Elonka 19:47, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:A_o_vinje.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:A_o_vinje.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:52, 3 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 06:52, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Judaism Newsletter
This newsletter was automatically delivered by ShepBot because you are a member of the WikiProject. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list. Delivered by §hepBot  ( Disable )  on 04:29, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Stein Ørnhøi
Jeg ser at Hanna Kvanmo har en stor artikkel på engelsk, men hennes makker på Stortinget, Stein Ørnhøi har enda ikke fått noen. Det er vel bare han og Helen Bøsterud igjen av de fra List of members of Stortinget 1977-1981 som ennå er røde, så kanskje du kunne oversette de fra norsk midt i alt det andre du holder på med. Mine bidrag er stort sett interwiki på engelsk wp og jeg vil måtte bruke uforholdsvis mye tid på å gjøre det, da jeg ikke så lett finner lenker osv. som en som har bidratt der med ordentlige artikler :-) --Harald Haugland (talk) 12:00, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Takk for artikkelen, den har mer informasjon enn den norske. Jeg synes er av det det mest stimulerende med wikipedia, at man kan finne utfyllende informasjon via interwiki. --Harald Haugland (talk) 17:42, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVIII (June 2008)
The June 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:24, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD for Timeline of US Presidents
It appears that no one has notified you that your article Timeline_of_Presidents_of_the_United_States has been nominated for deletion. At this time it looks like the article will be kept (as it is awesome). Some users are suggesting that the article would be better displayed as a horizontal list (this may also stop the article from unlocking both scroll bars in most browsers). I would do that myself but it seems that you're probably built this table from an excel file (or similar), so you might be the best to do that. either way, you aren't required to and we would love to have your input at AfD. Thanks! Protonk (talk) 16:04, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Redaction of AfD nominator's opening statement
Leifern, your deletion of a large chunk of the nominator's opening statement on Articles for deletion/Allegations of apartheid (fifth nomination)‎ strikes me as being both unjustified - since the linked AfDs are clearly highly relevant to this article - and a straightforward violation of the talk page guidelines. There are a few circumstances in which editing other people's comments is appropriate, but this would not be one of them. I don't think I've ever before come across a situation in which an AfD participant who opposes a nomination has tried to censor the nominator's opening statement. Please don't try to edit the opening statement again.

I realise that you are unlikely to listen to me, so I have raised the issue on AN/I to ask an uninvolved admin to counsel you - please see Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. -- ChrisO (talk) 17:30, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I have reviewed the section you removed and see nothing wrong with it? Why do you feel it is, "Poisoning the well?"  It is links to previous related discussions and AFD's.  This material would be useful in determining consensus (whether it is what you want or not?).  Please refrain from removing this section again.  Thanks! Chris lk02  Chris Kreider 17:36, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree with the two Chris's above; see the ANI thread.  Sandstein   18:07, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Clarification needed on past Arbcom vote
As a member of the Arbitration Committee that in August and September of 2007 heard the the this case, you assented to the following finding of fact:
 * 6) Seven editors (,, , , , , and ) voted to delete the allegations of Israeli apartheid article, largely on principle, after having earlier voted to keep the allegations of Brazilian apartheid article. Given the circumstances, the only reasonable explanation for this voting pattern is that the editors in question were attempting to prove a point regarding the allegations of Israeli apartheid article.

I took great exception to this assertion at the time, but decided not to vigorously defend myself, as it seemed clear to me that the finding would not get the needed majority to be established by the Arbcom; and that my scarce time was better spent on other issues, on the arbcom case and elsewhere on Wikipedia.

However, your vote for this finding has now been used as an argument to discount my vote on Articles for deletion/Allegations of apartheid (fifth nomination).:


 * This case eventually collapsed due to unresolvable divisions among the arbitrators, but the fact that four committee members were willing to endorse the aforementioned statement suggests that it wasn't a completely arbitrary charge. It's probably also worth noting that nine arbitrators agreed that "Allegations of Israeli apartheid" was the locus of the dispute. I would tend to think that these matters bear some relevance to the present discussion. CJCurrie (talk) 23:27, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Other editors have similarly raised this proposed finding of fact as a basis to question mine and others' vote on the AFD in question.

I am obviously not asking you to get involved in the AFD, but would like you to clear up the following:

If your vote in this Arbcom case can properly be construed as a legitimate argument for discounting my vote on any article that is related to Israel or apartheid, then I would like the chance to properly defend my votes on the articles in question and see if I can change your mind.

Conversely, if your vote fails to give the closing admin the grounds to discount my vote, then I would appreciate this clarification.

Just to be clear, this is the first time I have gotten involved in any "apartheid" related article since the Arbcom case. My apologies for having to drag you into this messy business again, and with thanks in advance for your consideration. --Leifern (talk) 00:11, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I think the finding was well-founded, after all no one has written a book about Brazilian apartheid, nor is it the subject of an international campaign. However, it was far in the past, not supported by the majority of the arbitrators who voted on it and, thus not appropriate to bring up as evidence of bad faith regarding your current posture in the deletion debate. Fred Talk 00:47, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: Arbcom vote clarification needed
Generally speaking, arbitration proposals that fail to pass have no weight whatsoever. If people were to start interpreting everything that's ever been voted on as holy writ, we'd be in trouble.

(More to the point, a finding that you'd tried to prove a point sometime in the past—even if it had passed—would not be automatic reason to exclude all future input from you, in my opinion.) Kirill (prof) 01:28, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Allegations of apartheid (fifth nomination) and canvassing
Hi Leifern - I appreciate the note you left on my talk page. I think we'll have to agree to disagree over my reasoning in closing the AFD (and you appear to be willing to do so), but I wanted to say a few more words on the issue of canvassing specifically. I did examine the canvassing allegations to see whether they showed any danger of biasing the AFD. On two of the four criteria, the tone of the message and its transparency, I think we can agree there is no issue - the message itself was quite neutral, and it was done very openly (I was aware of it, despite having had no involvement whatever in the issue, just because I had several of the affected User talk pages on my watchlist). You seem to be suggesting that his messages may have been to a biased audience, but I don't see how that is so. I took a quick sampling of the editors involved in the previous AFD discussions, an equal number of supporters and opposers of deletion, and checked them to see if they'd been reached by ChrisO's messages. In all cases, they had. Moreover, I looked at the voting patterns of the "canvassed" editors in the present AFD, and found that, if anything, they !voted slightly disproportionately on the Keep side. I simply do not see any evidence that ChrisO biased the result of the AFD through his behaviour. As I said in my closure, it's possible that his actions violated the "Scale" provisions of WP:CANVASS, but, even if they did, that's an issue of general Wikiquette, and not one of integrity of the AFD. Again, I do thank you for your civil comments, and hope that this addresses at least the canvassing portion of your concerns. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 22:15, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Wanda Hjort Heger DYK
Hi. I've reviewed your DYK submission for the article Wanda Hjort Heger, and made a comment on it at the submissions page. Please feel free to reply or comment there. Cheers, Olaf Davis | Talk 11:32, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIX (July 2008)
The July 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:56, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Judaism Newsletter
This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list.


 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  02:44, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject New Jersey advisory
 The WikiProject New Jersey Reboot Help Wanted! Articles are languishing, categories are stagnating, assessments are missing, the portal is static, and you can help.

You are cordially invited to visit the redesigned WikiProject New Jersey and invite others to do the same.

You are receiving this message as a member of WikiProject New Jersey. You can remove yourself from the mailing list here.
 * Notice delivery by xenobot  01:13, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Genetic factors for autism
I replied at Talk:Heritability of autism. Eubulides (talk) 14:40, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (August 2008)

 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  18:46, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Paltiel
Hei! Thanks for fixing (rather, for removing) place of death. You should fix it in bokmål, as well! I've added photo of V.K. to English Paltiel article; you may remove it if you think it inappropriate. As many photos as there are of J.P., it must be possible to get one or two (young from book, old from Aftenposten??) for the articles! Might his widow release them? (I actually have the announcement of his appearance from kyrkjelydsbladet, with the youthful photo.)

A curiosity. I saw Paltiel 2-3 years ago. The man exuded purpose and strength and gave a fascinating and living lecture, in spite of apparently having given the same talk hundreds(?) of times before! I saw the tattoo on his forearm and I bought the book. I recall that the number on his forearm either started or ended with 99 or 66. The number in the book doesn't. A mini-mystery. Cheers, --Hordaland (talk) 12:42, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

The Judaism Newsletter
This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list. As always, please direct all questions, comments, requests, barnstars, offers of help, and angry all-caps anti-semitic rants to my talk page. Thanks, and have a great month. L'Aquatique</b> [ approves | this | message  ] 20:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  21:24, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:46, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXX (August 2008)
The August 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:36, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The September 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fourteen candidates. Please vote here by September 30! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:37, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Norwegian Barnstar of National Merit

 * Takker og bukker. --Leifern (talk) 00:19, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (September 2008)

 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  16:28, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)
The September 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:09, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (October 2008)

 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  13:28, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)
The October 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:21, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)
The November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 16:53, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Bernadotte engraving source
Hi Leifern, Wondering if you could provide the source, book or otherwise, for the Bernadotte engraving you posted on Wiki? Fine regards, John —Preceding unsigned comment added by Semper Liberi (talk • contribs) 19:14, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Bernadotte engraving source
Hi Leifern, Wondering if you could provide the source, book or otherwise, for the Bernadotte engraving you posted on Wiki? Fine regards, John —Preceding unsigned comment added by Semper Liberi (talk • contribs) 19:25, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Norse History and Culture Assessement Drive
Hey, over the past few months, Berig and I have been attempting to assess all the unassessed articles tagged with the Wikiproject banner. This is a very time consuming process and with around a thousand left, I would much appreciate your help. Thanks, ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 16:08, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of Norwegian photographers
I have nominated List of Norwegian photographers, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/List of Norwegian photographers&. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Stifle (talk) 14:46, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

List of Norwegian photographers
It seems to me that you are violating your own principles in nominating this article for deletion. Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I find no basis in WP:N or in the AFD policy for "As per the previous AFD, this dead-end list consisting mostly of redlinks would be better as a self-maintaining category." There are many lists on Wikipedia, and there is no time limit for when it needs to be populated. If you think there should be a policy or guideline against lists with too many redlinks, feel free to propose it. Otherwise, these nominations take up time that could have been better spent writing and editing articles, say, about Norwegian photographers. I also want to point out that the first AFD failed, and if anything the basis for keeping it improved since then. --Leifern (talk) 14:27, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure which of my principles you claim I'm violating, but it's clear that we have different notability standards. Stifle (talk) 17:33, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't have a notability standard: instead I use those proposed in WP:N. In your AFD, you made some rather vague comments about "dead end" and "red links," none of which illustrate any element of the WP:N. The general guideline states that "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article." The principle you have violated, is that you expect those who voice their views on AFD to specifically state the basis for their view - your AFD had absolutely no substance, and was essentially a repeat of an earlier failed AFD. --Leifern (talk) 21:02, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't recall having a principle that I expect people who voice their views on AFD to specifically state the basis for their view. Stifle (talk) 20:30, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Carl Fredriksens Transport
Your DYK nom for Carl Fredriksens Transport: There is a minor issue with the hook, I read the article but the hook isn't supported in the article, (the hook's wording doesn't match up with what the article says), the length and date were find, maybe an alternate is needed. I made a note on the DYK suggestions page. --IvoShandor (talk) 21:37, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Carl Fredriksens Transport
--Dravecky (talk) 05:49, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)
The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:44, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Featured article review/Gunnhild, Mother of Kings
Your comments would be welcome. Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 23:21, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Nord-Odal coat of arms.gif
An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Nord-Odal coat of arms.gif, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 07:07, 30 January 2009 (UTC)  -- Skier Dude  ( talk ) 07:07, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Logo den norske kirke.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Logo den norske kirke.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Skier Dude ( talk ) 07:16, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Featured article candidates/Kylfings
A new FAC vote which may interest you. Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 19:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)
The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:29, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron!
Thanks for enlisting! Looking forward to seeing your work in the future. You wrote on the membership page: "Eclectic interests, sporadic participation, but a particular emphasis on Norwegian history." You my want to join and monitor: WikiProject Deletion sorting/Norway if an article is tagged for deletion which you feel is worthy enough to be saved, you can add the tag, right below the AfD tag. Don't hesitate to ask me a question, or ask for help. Ikip (talk) 02:37, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)
The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:53, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:30, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:30, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)
The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:06, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Niels Christian Ditleff
Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible.


 * Nevermind...the hook is approved now, and is on T:DYK/N, soon to be on the Main Page. Good work! Cheers.  I 'mperator 00:04, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Regarding Niels Christian Ditleff, are you sure he died in Oslo? As far as I remember he crashed his car somewhere in Sweden and I thought he died at the crash site? Ulflarsen (talk) 04:50, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, in Norsk Biografisk Leksikon it says that his place of death was Oslo. But you may be right - I've seen confusion several times about where someone actually died vs. where their bodies were brought afterwards. If you can find a source, I'd be happy to change it. --Leifern (talk) 13:18, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVIII (April 2009)
The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:35, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)
The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:15, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Kathryn Ellen Lilley
Hello,

I removed the PROD - the bad Carolyn Keene page was caused by someone merging Kathryn Lilley, a minorly notable author who wrote a couple Nancy Drew Files books, with the existing Carolyn Keene article. Clearly they were confused and didn't actually understand they implications of their merge.

I have taken all the necessary steps to get things back to the way they should be, so no further action is needed on your part. I just thought you might want to know how such blatantly wrong information happened. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:01, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to ARS!
{| style="border: 4px solid #CC0000; padding: 6px; width: 80%; min-width: 700px; background: #FFFAF0; line-height: 20px; cellpading=30" align=center Hi,, welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron! We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying and rescuing articles that have been tagged for deletion. Every day hundreds of articles are deleted, many rightfully so. But many concern notable subjects and are poorly written, ergo fixable and should not be deleted. We try to help these articles quickly improve and address the concerns of why they are proposed for deletion. This covers a lot of ground and your help is appreciated!
 * colspan="2" |

Gunnar Høst Sjøwall
Did you notice that an article you initiated on Gunnar Høst Sjøwall has been prod'd?

Skål - Williamborg (Bill) 03:53, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XL (June 2009)
The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:06, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Robert Fisk
I would ask you to please refrain from adding personal insults in edit comments like you did here, and stick to the facts of the matter. --Saddhiyama (talk) 10:25, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Apparently you misunderstood my comment. If you read what I have written, you will notice that I did not mention the article or the edit, my only beef was with the edit comment. That your insult was directed at Robert Fisk and not at any editor does not make it any more acceptable. --Saddhiyama (talk) 12:46, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Benjamin Abrams


The article Benjamin Abrams has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no references

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mr.TrustWorthy Got Something to Tell Me? 14:36, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009)
The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:13, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Discussion at WikiProject New Jersey
Hi, Leifern, User:Nightscream and I had a disagreement over certain parts of NJ municipality articles; because the discussion could potentially affect hundreds of articles, we decided to bring the discussion to WikiProject New Jersey. I would value your input in the discussion, which you can find at here. Thanks, A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 14:46, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September! Many thanks,  Roger Davies  talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009)
The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:30, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of HeartMate
I have nominated HeartMate, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/HeartMate. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ash (talk) 21:04, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Military history coordinator elections: voting has started!
Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September! For the coordinators,  Roger Davies  talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009)
The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:49, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

WikiBirthday
I saw from here that it's been exactly five years since you joined the project. Happy WikiBirthday! Keep up the good work, <b class="Unicode">r ʨ anaɢ</b> talk/contribs 21:55, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Happy Birthday from the only other person known to register on this date! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 22:37, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Proposed compromise aimed at consensus at WP:NJ
Hi, Leifern. As you may remember, way back in August I started a thread at WikiProject New Jersey to discuss the "Federal, state, and county representation" subsections in New Jersey municipality articles, as User:Nightscream and I had a substantial disagreement on that subject. Approximately two months later, we've hammered out a compromise that we mostly agree upon, and presently I am seeing if there is a consensus for this compromise. I'm leaving this message here not as canvassing, but because you participated in this discussion previously and perhaps would be interested in weighing in on the compromise. The full discussion is here, and the proposed compromise is here. Thanks in advance for participating! A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 03:18, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Test your World War I knowledge with the Henry Allingham International Contest!
As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:36, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)
The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:36, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (November 2009)

 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  14:08, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Friedrich Kellner
I just sent you an email, but in case it does not get through to you, I thought I should write to you here, as well. I am hoping you can help me with the Friedrich Kellner article, to translate it into Norwegian. I have a condensed version of the article on a Word document that I can send to you (about 1500 words). Thank you, Scott Rskellner (talk) 21:42, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009)
The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:04, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVI (December 2009)
The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:47, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Leifern! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 6 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:58, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) James E. Burke -
 * 2) Ole Gabriel Ueland -
 * 3) Marianne Blankenberg -
 * 4) Wenche Lowzow -
 * 5) Niels Christian Geelmuyden -
 * 6) Jennifer Belle -

DYK nomination
I commented at your recent DYK nomination; the hook appears to have a slightly different claim than the article. Ucucha 21:27, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject New Jersey Newsletter (January 2010)

 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  13:48, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Conducting research on WikiProjects
We are professors at Carnegie Mellon University conducting research on how online groups operate, with a strong history of research on Wikipedia.

We would like to discuss collaborating with you with the goals of both improving integration of new members into your WikiProject as well as advancing the understanding of the science behind online groups.

Our recent research has shown that joining a WikiProject boosts editors' contributions to the project substantially, and that specific kinds of interactions between existing project members and newcomers encourage newcomers to contribute more and longer. We are now working on translating these findings into interventions that will increase the vitality of WikiProjects, helping them attract, motivate, and retain members who are knowledgeable and able to contribute to the project. We have identified your project (Finance) as an initial candidate that we would love to work with moving forward based on your participants and the amount of assessment work your project needs accomplished. Please feel free to contact me (Prof. Robert Kraut robert.kraut@cmu.edu) with any questions and to find out more.

Information about our research can be found at http://community.hciresearch.org/content/improving-socialization-newcomers-wikiprojects.

If you are interested in this collaboration please contact Rosta Farzan at rfarzan@cs.cmu.edu or leave a note at Rosta Farzan's talk page at (talk)

Thank you,

(Rosta Farzan (talk), Feb 2, 2010 —Preceding undated comment added 17:54, 2 February 2010 (UTC).

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)
The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:06, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Photography in Denmark
Hello Leifern. I have read with interest your background info and have looked at a few articles you have helped to write about Norway. In particular, I liked Architecture of Norway, espeicially as I have spent quite a lot of time and effort myself on Architecture of Denmark.

The main reason I am writing today is that you also appear to have an interest in photography. I was wondering if you would like to take a look at a new article I am writing on Photography in Denmark. It could really do with a few more contibutions from third parties. Feel free to add your own content or just let me know what else you think needs to be done.

Finally, I see you have had a few articles in DYK. If you think this one is a candidate, please help me by submitting it for consideration. I'm afraid I simply cannot use the strange templates they provide! Ipigott (talk) 10:04, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

White Buses
The article about the White Buses needs to be cleaned up, but my English is probably not up to the task, could you be interested in improving the article? Best regards, Ulflarsen (talk) 14:11, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:55, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)
The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:48, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Coordinator elections have opened!
Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:03, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

A Request for Help
Hi there Leifern :), I noticed your username on Translators Available Norwegian to English, and was wondering if you could help with updating Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi on the Norwegian Wikipedia? Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi on the English Wikipedia has been majorly revamped- particularly, its being treated as a BLP now, since no one has been able to find evidence of his death.  I'm sorry to say I know little Norwegian, so I'd really appreciate your help in this :), although I understand if you don't have the time. Thanks in advance! <b style="color:#32B430;">Omirocksthisworld</b>( Drop a line ) 04:59, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
 * That seems very reasonable to me :). Thanks, <b style="color:#32B430;">Omirocksthisworld</b>( Drop a line ) 06:16, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Need your help treanslating important articles from English to Norwegian
These articles which are about Israel needs to be translated into the several current anti-Israel articles in the Norwegian Wikipedia to balance the bias. Is there any chance I could contact you about this important work through Email/Instant messaging? TheCuriousGnome (talk) 04:27, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Rats in New York City
Hello! Your submission of Rats in New York City at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! JohnBlackburne words<sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;">deeds 13:56, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)
The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:09, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

White Buses
The article about the White Buses is still tagged, if you have time and interest, could you have a look at it? I will use some time myself on the version in Bokmål/Riksmål but good if someone with better knowledge of English could take care of the article here. Best regards - Ulflarsen (talk) 22:12, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Otto Eisler
In case you were not already aware, I responded to your DYK nomination withdrawal at T:TDYK. --Cryptic C62 · Talk 01:50, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Rate for Time series
Hi,

What are the units for the rate being graphed in this chart? --SaskatchewanSenator (talk) 20:05, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Christian Frederik.jpeg
Thank you for uploading File:Christian Frederik.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:58, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:58, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Carl Johan Bernadotte.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Carl Johan Bernadotte.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:58, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:58, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Madame Royale.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Madame Royale.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:01, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:01, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Jorgen Moe.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Jorgen Moe.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:59, 3 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:59, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Ballot for monarchy in Norway 1905.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Ballot for monarchy in Norway 1905.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:18, 3 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:18, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)
The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:40, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Eiliv Austlid
As soon as possible, you should add references to your new article Eiliv Austlid. It looks somewhat incomplete so I didn't tag it with anything, but it's worth doing sooner rather then later. Thanks, Gosox(55)(55) 14:53, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Great addition. It was a gaping hole in our coverage. I added an image. Rettetast (talk) 10:40, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Refugee controversy in Sjöbo
Um, I think you missed the fact that the article was moved from my sandbox to the mainspace yesterday. :P Theleftorium (talk) 20:34, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

New category?
Hi! Di you think a Category:Jewish military personnel of World War II could be an ok category? Perhaps it, for obvious reasons, could be interesting to categorize Jews who fought in this particular conflict (not other conflicts, though). Geschichte (talk) 15:42, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, though it might make sense to subcategorize it further by the country whose flag they served under. In Norway, for example, Norwegian Jews served far out of proportion to their share of the population. Leifern (talk) 17:34, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Further subcategorization is a question of how many, say, Norwegian Jewish soldiers who get Wikipedia articles, though. (Even Salo Grenning has an article only because of his newspaper career.) Geschichte (talk) 15:10, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Happy Leifern's Day!
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it.<span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — <b style="color:#060;">Rlevse</b> • Talk  • 00:04, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Eiliv Austlid
<span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — <b style="color:#060;">Rlevse</b> • Talk  • 13:20, 31 May 2010 (UTC) 06:04, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Your contributed article, SS Monte Rosa
Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, SS Monte Rosa. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - MV Empire Windrush. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at MV Empire Windrush - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Mjroots (talk) 14:28, 2 June 2010 (UTC)


 * OK, it wasn't recent, but the other article is better developed, and at the correct title. Mjroots (talk) 14:29, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)
The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:23, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Battle of Dombås
Hi Leifern. Thanks for correcting the Battle of Dombås article per the new info. However, I don't see that you provided any references for changes, could you please do that? It's not enough to point to Austlid's article. Also, Austlid's article needs a link to the Battle of Dombås and to the fact that the German soldiers were Fallschirmjägers. I would do this myself, but I just don't have much time these days. Manxruler (talk) 22:09, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Thought you might be interested
See here. Cheers. IronDuke 00:00, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:18, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

RE: Fast Five (consulting)
There is no need to antagonize me please, I have read the citation when I branded it for CSD and since you said it was improved since I put the tag on, I understand why it was removed, but please don't just brand me as the time-waster because I am doing this with GF(Good Faith) and AGF is good for everyone.Yousou (talk) 11:38, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Good faith is fine, but it is also important to get acquainted with guidelines for deletion. It is still possible to waste other people's time with all the good faith in the world. Leifern (talk) 12:50, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIII (July 2010)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:39, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Count wedel jarlsberg.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Count wedel jarlsberg.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:36, 6 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:36, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Rescue
Articles for deletion/Armageddon theology WritersCramp (talk) 13:25, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

The Milhist election has started!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies  talk 19:18, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your rating
As you might have noticed, I have done the majority of the work on the article about Dave Stamper, and I was very pleased to receive a "B" for the very first rating. I've worked hard to reference every claim and hope to get it to "GA" or possibly even "FA" status. Thank you. K8 fan (talk) 03:03, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Count wedel jarlsberg.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Count wedel jarlsberg.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:33, 25 October 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 18:33, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:18, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:48, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Kyriacos Demetriou
Materialscientist (talk) 08:38, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrolled
Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:
 * This permission does not give you any special status or authority
 * Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
 * You may wish to display the Autopatrolled top icon and/or the User wikipedia/autopatrolled userbox on your user page
 * If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
 * If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   17:55, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 16:10, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:12, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of WikiProject Business world
WikiProject Business world, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Business world and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of WikiProject Business world during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. JJ98 (Talk)  00:44, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 04:03, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:59, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011
To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:00, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:25, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

The Catholic Church and the Protestant bishops letter (The Holocaust in Norway)
Hello, Leifern. I see you did a ton of work on The Holocaust in Norway article. I removed a comment saying the Catholics did not sign the letter the Protestant bishops wrote to Quisling on 10 November 1942 protesting the treatment of the Jews. The link in the reference is apparently to a copy of the letter itself, which I could not open. The comment about the Catholics not signing is surely true, but it is, I think, original research because it comments on something "missing" from the original document. On that basis alone it should be removed. If it stays (and it should not) then we have to list all the other non-Protestant churches that did not sign: Catholics, Jews, Buddhists, Bahai, Humanists, Zoroastrians, Sikhs, Hindus, etc. Also, the Catholic presence in Norway in 1942 was about 3,000 members, so I'm not sure if it could even be considered part of the "religious establishment". I appreciate your thoughts. --  Kenatipo   speak! 16:32, 28 July 2011 (UTC) --  Kenatipo    speak! 16:57, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:31, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 18:16, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Interview for the 2011 Wikipedia Fundraiser
Hello Leifern, I hope you're well. My name is Aaron and I'm one of the Storytellers working on the 2011 fundraiser here at the Wikimedia Foundation. For this year's campaign we're seeking out and interviewing active Wikipedians like yourself, in order to produce a broader and more representative range of "personal appeals" to run come November. If you'd like to participate in this project, please email me at amuszalskiwikimedia.org. Interviews are typically conducted by phone or Skype and take between 30-90 minutes. (Note: This invitation is open to any interested Wikipedian — If you're reading this, and would like to be interviewed as well, please contact me.) Thanks! Aaron (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 02:26, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 08:24, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Jewish deportees from Norway during World War II
Please read WP:IINFO before you restore the list that comprises 99% of the article, again. Yes, it was an atrocity that over 700 people were sent to their deaths. However, the English Wikipedia is not the place to list the name, birth date, hometown, profession, day they were arrested, day they were deported, day they died, age, boat they were deported on, camp they were interned at, and their ID tattoo number for every (or any) Jew who was deported from Norway and died in the concentration camps. The IP's version at least only names the individuals who survived and those who have articles on the English Wikipedia.— Ryulong (<font color="Gold">竜龙 ) 11:07, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * There is no basis in WP:INFO for deleting these names. It is not an indiscriminate collection of information more than say a list of mountaintops over xxxx meters or rivers in a country. I consider attempts at deleting these lists an active effort of Holocaust revisionism. You should be ashamed of yourself. Leifern (talk) 11:18, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * It is not Holocaust revisonism to remove an unencyclopedic list of the 768 men and women removed from Norway and everything possible recorded about them. This is not information that belongs on Wikipedia. WP:IINFO covers this exactly. Wikipedia does not need to be host to this information, merely because it is out there. It is clear that myself and the Norwegian IP disagree with what you believe is proper content on Wikipedia.— Ryulong (<font color="Gold">竜龙 ) 11:29, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * It covers it exactly only if you believe this list is indiscriminate. I did not compile a random list of names and pile it in. The IP has made a number of additional edits that make it clear that his/her agenda is to put the entire event in doubt. This is a common tactic among revisionists, and you can see the same type of effort in The Holocaust in Norway. I can see he has a willing accomplice in you, though. I know where this is going: the two of you are going to tag-team until I run out of reverts and thereby bully me out of the matter. And you'll succeed, to the detriment of Wikipedia. Congratulations. Leifern (talk) 11:33, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * What sort of farkakt logic is going through your head? It is indiscriminate to list every Jewish Norwegian man, woman, and child who got sent to the concentration camps. If you have an issue with the other edits done to the page, just go back and leave the 1/6 megabyte list off of it.— Ryulong (<font color="Gold">竜龙 ) 11:37, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * What is your cut-off of number of victims for the list to become indiscriminate? If I wrote an article naming two victims of a murderer, would you delete those two names? How about 6? 8? Leifern (talk) 11:41, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * You are comparing homicide to genocide.— Ryulong (<font color="Gold">竜龙 ) 11:52, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Were these people murdered or not? Leifern (talk) 12:01, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I am well aware that my distant relatives were killed by the millions. The fact still stands that Wikipedia does not need to provide a list of all of them that came from a single nation, and you should not be making the analogy that if these people should not be listed, that no person who was killed by another should be mentioned by name on Wikipedia. I have restored your wording of the article, without the list of the 768 Norwegian Jews, but with the IP's list of those who have articles on Wikipedia.— Ryulong (<font color="Gold">竜龙 ) 12:09, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * You cite guidelines that have tenuous - to put it kindly - relevance to this issue, and I am merely trying to help you out by asking what distinction you are trying to make. As far as I can tell, your main objection is that "it takes too much space." People do not have to be notable to be named in an article, and "indiscriminate" clearly means that the list is random, without any clear distinction. Neither do the guidelines for lists apply in this case. Then you are making a distinction between genocide and homocide, ignoring that the former is a subset of the latter. Leifern (talk) 12:15, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Can I make a suggestion? Stop responding to each other for the time being. Why not create a rule to this unnecessary game. The next person who responds to the other in this indented section, automatically loses the arguments being made. Meaning, they will have gotten the last word in, but they have lost the argument. Russavia Let's dialogue 12:18, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Russavia, this is not kindergarten. I appreciate your constructive suggestion and have in fact followed it, but please spare me this kind of patronizing stuff. Leifern (talk) 12:22, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Leifern, whilst the list is not indiscriminate, it isn't really appropriate for an encyclopaedia. HOWEVER, having said that, the complete referenced list would be suitable for inclusion at Wikisource. If you were to transplant that list to Wikisource, you could then include an external link to the link from the article here on Wikipedia, and I don't think there would be an editor here who would object to that. The list itself should probably only really include notable people. Think about that option, because the way consensus is at the moment, it is not in your favour. And if you continue to accuse people of being Holocaust revisionists, you may find yourself blocked for making personal attacks. You obviously have information that you wish to include; work with other editors to find the most appropriate place for it; Wikisource is the way to go. Russavia Let's dialogue 11:48, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the suggestion. I will look into it. I believing that Ryulong is acting in good faith, though clearly he has a strange interpretation of notability and "indiscriminate" guidelines. There does seem to be a prevailing trend to not include lists of victims in other articles I've looked at (and Ryulong would have been a lot more persuasive if he/she had made that point). The IP is actually making an effort to subvert the issue, and it's hard to interpret his/her actions as anything but revisionism. Leifern (talk) 12:01, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I think all of you are acting in good faith. The more relevant information is WP:LISTS and also things like WP:N. The information isn't indiscriminate in that the contents are very well defined, and that is done by way of "Jewish people were deported from Norway during WWII"; and that definition is obviously a notable topic, evidenced by the references in the article itself. However, as you mentioned, long lists are often not included for varying reasons. To give you an example of something I have been toying with writing for sometime; Russian Anzacs - that being Russian born people who fought for Australia during World War I. The topic is notable, and a scholar has done some excellent research on the subject, and has information on almost every Russian Anzac who is known. But an article on the subject on WP wouldn't include a list of all 1,000 Russian Anzacs, but it would include notable subjects within that theme. A complete list of course could be suitable for Wikisource because the information has been published. Definitely go to Wikisource, place your referenced list there, come back and place a link within the article WP:ELs, and if anyone has a problem with that, you let me know, and I will argue the inclusion on your behalf and/or with you. Russavia Let's dialogue 12:39, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Aside from the fact that I apparently cannot spell "homicide" and that I was using what is feasibly the wrong criteria, these edits are not vandalism. Vandalism is the bad faith removal of material. The IP is trying to improve the page by removing content that he believes is not suitable for it.— Ryulong (<font color="Gold">竜龙 ) 12:32, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Regarding the list, I have posted a proposal to the article's discussion page. Ulflarsen (talk) 18:31, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

ANI
WP:ANI.— Ryulong (<font color="Gold">竜龙 ) 08:52, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In Jewish deportees from Norway during World War II, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Norwegian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:46, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Sophia Charlotte of Hanover.jpg needs authorship information
Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Sophia Charlotte of Hanover.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).


 * If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: will produce an appropriate expansion, or use the own template.


 * If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:03, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Military Historian of the Year
Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:38, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.

The Bugle: Issue LXX, January 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:18, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Looking for a source for this quotation
In September 2006, you added this information to the article on Telegraphy:

America's first telegram was sent by Morse on January 6, 1838, across two miles of wiring. The message read "A patient waiter is no loser."

Do you have an independent source for the quotation?

Wa3frp (talk) 15:03, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Could not find a source for this above quote that you added to Telegraphy. The quote is now removed. If you do see this and have a source, please re-add the quote.

I also see that the January 6, 1838 date is in question. The Speedwell Village Web site indicates that this event occurred on January 11, 1938. Do you have any comments? Wa3frp (talk) 23:50, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXI, February 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 10:06, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Antisemitism in Norway source
Hi Leifern,

A question has come up regarding one of the sources you used in the Antisemitism in Norway article. Please see Talk:Antisemitism in Norway. Jayjg <small style="color:darkgreen;">(talk) 23:43, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXII, March 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 02:21, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXIII, April 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:21, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXIV, May 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 14:58, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

GOCE July 2012 Copy Edit Drive
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 19:09, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXVI, July 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 09:32, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXVII, August 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 01:00, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Military history coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 09:24, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXVIII, September 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project and/or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:46, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXIX, October 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Nick-D (talk) and Ian Rose (talk) 02:44, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

List of deportees
It's not my fault that the list was deleted on another website because it doesn't belong there. It was removed from Wikipedia because it doesn't belong here either. Do not place the list onto this project, again. We decided a while back that it's not the proper place to host it.— Ryulong ( 琉竜 ) 05:02, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Also, it's already been moved back here.— Ryulong ( 琉竜 ) 05:11, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Unless you are royalty, "we" decided no such thing. You suggested, after pressure from a blatant Holocaust revisionist, that the list would be appropriate at the commons, and I agreed as a gesture of good faith toward you. If you didn't think it belonged there, either, you clearly acted in bad faith and are no admitting it. There is absolutely no basis in policy or guidelines to exclude such a list. Wikipedia is not paper. --Leifern (talk) 05:56, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I didn't move it to the Commons. I moved it to Wikisource where it was deleted earlier this year due to their own inclusion policies which I was not aware of when I made the move to get it off of the English Wikipedia. And there is a basis in the policies and guidelines that say to exclude the list and that is WP:IINFO. It's not relevant for an encyclopedia to include a list of the names, occupations, dates of birth, port of entry, dates of death, etc. of every Jewish person deported in Norway. It may be important for you because you worked so hard on compiling the list, but it is not something Wikipedia should cover within the article about the deportation itself. Again, it's been restored on the English Wikipedia at List of Jewish deportees from Norway during World War II. So get off of my back, stop complaining about being slighted concerning the inclusion policies of this project and its sisters, and stop accusing that one IP of being a "Holocaust revisionist" for not thinking the list was proper content for Wikipedia.— Ryulong ( 琉竜 ) 10:32, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * You might want to review the edits the IP tried to make. There is no basis in policy or guidelines for not including such a list, and I will thank you not to speculate on my motivations. And I "got on your back" by courteously informing you that the issue has come up again. You can be sure I won't bother with that again. --Leifern (talk) 17:55, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Category:Current heirs apparent
Category:Current heirs apparent, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:36, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXX, November 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:47, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello Leifern
I was Going Through Arhives Of homeopathy Talk And Feel That It Again Needs A Serious Discussion .. Would Like To Call You Back To Have A Your View Point. Shivang Tyagi (talk) 01:48, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXI, December 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:28, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

WP Norway in the Signpost
The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Norway for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. –Mabeenot (talk) 18:56, 12 January 2013 (UTC)