User talk:AngelOfDestiny

Welcome!
Hello, AngelOfDestiny, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Commando (film) have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place   before the question. Again, welcome!  The Old Jacobite  The '45  02:22, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vitaly Rudakovskiy
Hello, AngelOfDestiny. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Vitaly Rudakovskiy, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Vitaly Rudakovskiy to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Jprg1966   (talk)  17:36, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
You are receiving this as you have recently added an interwiki link to a page!

Wikidata has been deployed to the English Wikipedia. Wikidata manages interwiki links on a separate project on pages such as this. This means that on Wikipedia articles there is now a language bar on the left hand side of your screen where you can edit and add links rather than adding them into the articles themselves.

If you have any questions regarding Wikidata please use the talk page Wikipedia talk:Wikidata.

Dl2000 (talk) 02:29, 19 March 2014 (UTC) Dl2000 (talk) 02:29, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dinko Zhelyazkov
Hello, AngelOfDestiny. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Dinko Zhelyazkov, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ravendrop 08:20, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
Hello. Your recent edit to List of male professional bodybuilders appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. — Mel bourne Star ☆ talk 02:37, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Konstantin Nerchenko
Hello, AngelOfDestiny. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Konstantin Nerchenko, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Konstantin Nerchenko to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, st170etalk 17:22, 5 October 2014 (UTC)


 * I added the references. AngelOfDestiny (talk) 19:58, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
st170etalk 15:25, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

January 2015
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
 * Although you did provide a source, the source is not reliable. Please see WP:RSOPINION for the reason blogs are not acceptable in this circumstance.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  19:08, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I thought I'd explain a bit about reliable sources. The big thing about what makes a source reliable is whether or not it can be verified in some form or fashion. In other words, does the source undergo any sort of editorial oversight that can be verified? If so, what type of editorial oversight does it have? Has the source been known for posting false material or otherwise tampering with their content? (IE, do they routinely mis-quote something, mis-represent something, or talk about the subject in a tabloid-esque fashion?) For the most part blogs will not pass the verification process since they are almost always self-published sources (WP:SPS) that undergo little to no editorial oversight that can be verified. There are some rare exeptions to this but those are usually when we have the blogs of someone that is exceedingly well known (a professional organization, a well-known person like Stephen King, etc) and their blogs are usually routinely quoted in other reliable sources. Now when you get more professional websites you are more likely to get usable articles and reviews, but even then you have to look at their submission guidelines: do they edit the material or do they post it "as is"? Some sites will not edit the material at all except for minor grammatical errors, meaning that the content is pretty much unverified. This may not seem as bad for stuff like reviews, but essentially it makes the website an "anyone can publish" type of deal, which can be a big issue if they're writing an article about something as opposed to a review. (Although even then sometimes people can make claims in reviews that can be based on myth or rumor, which can be problematic.) My basic rule of thumb is to look and see if the site is listed on Rotten Tomatoes. Any critic on Rotten Tomatoes would count as a reliable source on Wikipedia (although note that the audience reviews/reception does not count towards notability). That's not to mean that they're the end all of usable reviews, mind you. If you don't see them on RT then the next step would be to look at their editorial process (as noted above) and if you have any questions, bring the source up on WP:RS/N. They're usually pretty good about getting back to you quickly. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   09:04, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Fight and Revenge for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fight and Revenge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fight and Revenge until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:40, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sergey Kucherov (bodybuilder)


A tag has been placed on Sergey Kucherov (bodybuilder) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 18:10, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Feras Saied


The article Feras Saied has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 15:05, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Sergey Arkhipov for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sergey Arkhipov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sergey Arkhipov until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Onel 5969  TT me 16:32, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Second Blood


The article Second Blood has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Film that has not yet begun production, and thus should not have an article per WP:NFF.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 02:01, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mykola Karpuk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IFBB. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dave Guest (bodybuilder), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mr. Universe. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Tiny Mix Tapes
Please don't add Tiny Mix Tapes reviews to Everything Is Love or any other articles, as it's considered an unreliable source per WP:ALBUMAVOID.  snap snap  (talk) 02:26, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Everything Is Love. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Hayman30 (talk) 11:40, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Wojciech Waleczek
Please note that once you've submitted an AFC draft to the review queue, it has to stay there until it's reviewed by an AFC reviewer. You can't bypass the process by moving the page yourself, or by getting somebody else to move the page for you — once it's in the review queue, the only way to get it moved into mainspace is to get it accepted by a reviewer. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 17:35, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wojciech Waleczek (July 10)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Justlettersandnumbers was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wojciech Waleczek and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Wojciech Waleczek, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Wojciech_Waleczek Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Justlettersandnumbers&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Wojciech_Waleczek reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:55, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vladimir Ashcheulov


A tag has been placed on Vladimir Ashcheulov requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. 15:17, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Wojciech Waleczek concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Wojciech Waleczek, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Abdulhadi Al-Khayat


A tag has been placed on Abdulhadi Al-Khayat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Splinemath (talk) 02:57, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Wojciech Waleczek


Hello, AngelOfDestiny. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wojciech Waleczek".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 21:49, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Warning about civility
This edit won't help your cause. I responded you civilly on several occasions and there was no need for such blatant rudeness and uncivilty - I would hate to see you get blocked or banned from editing your favourite pages, however you must learn to edit civilly and discuss edits where there might be instances of fancruft or a potentially non-neutral point of view. If I wasn't trying to help you, I wouldn't have included links to the relevant policies or procedures. Things like listing an article where something says "best album of the year so far" isn't an official accolade that we can list because its a snapshot in time, not a full list/published definitive list.

Not that I need to explain to you, but I'm actually an Xtina fan and I think its great that fans are rediscovering previous albums. I'm simply trying to maintain a neutral and fair reflection of the views on the album and not giving undue weight that turs wikipedia into a fansite. We're an encyclopedia not a blog or fansite.

Please do not leave uncivil messages on my talk page again, otherwise I will notify administrators. Additionally, if you want to discuss things I'm more than happy to do so on article talk pages so long as things are kept to facts and the articles themselves. Please don't bring wikipedia into disripute. ≫ Lil- Unique1 -{  Talk  }- 17:59, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Alicia (album). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. isento (talk) 12:49, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Erika Eleniak
Hi. Please do not add uncited material to articles, as you did with this edit to Erika Elenia. I know you don't edit that often, but since you've been doing so since 2014, you may have been told or read that Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an inline citation. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 03:56, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

New message
HĐ (talk) 14:16, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Whiplash (Selena Gomez & the Scene song)
I considered your mentioning these articles for AfD, so I started two discussions for Whiplash (Selena Gomez & the Scene song) and Mmm Papi. I hope you can comment. Cheers! HĐ (talk) 02:24, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your comments! Would you mind also commenting on Wipe Your Eyes and Harajuku Girls (song)? Thank you very much! HĐ (talk) 16:06, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Candy Shop (Madonna song) (January 18)
Hi, AngelOfDestiny. An AfD discussion for Candy Shop (Madonna song) has started. Please feel free to comment if you are interested. Thank you very much, HĐ (talk) 02:43, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

AfD
Hello. Please comment on this AfD discussion, if you are interested. Thanks. Bionic (talk) 11:13, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Record charts for Quebec (ADISQ)
Can you please stop adding record charts for Quebec (ADISQ)? Quebec is a region of Canada and therefore any chart for Quebec is a component chart of the wider country's recognised record chart. We generally don't use regional charts anywhere on wikipedia. If you think we should this needs to be discussed at Wikipedia talk:Record charts first and a consensus gained. If you have added any further additions of the chart please remove them. ≫  Lil- Unique1  -{ Talk  }- 20:43, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Single Vendor Charts
Please stop adding the Taiwanese Albums chart sourced from KKBox or 5Music. Per WP:SINGLEVENDOR these are not appropriate charts for use on wikipedia. ≫  Lil- Unique1  -{ Talk  }- 18:35, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

October 2023
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Christina Aguilera. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. The number of attendees in a concert is not relevant to the page. See WP:ROC. Maxwell King 123321 22:12, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, AngelOfDestiny. Thank you for your work on Tardza Project. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   15:41, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

February 2024
Hello, I'm Jeraxmoira. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to IMbesharam have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 17:25, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to IMbesharam. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. ''Do not restore the edits unless you intend to rewrite them.
 * Imbesharam.com boasts an extensive catalog?
 * the platform offers something for everyone, ensuring a fulfilling and personalized shopping experience.
 * The platform prioritizes customer satisfaction and discretion. Source?
 * Additionally, Imbesharam.com invests in customer service and support, ensuring that shoppers receive assistance and guidance throughout their shopping journey, further enhancing the overall experience.
 * Source for Reception and controversies section?
 * further solidifying its position as a premier destination for adult entertainment needs.'' Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:00, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:57, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at IMbesharam, you may be blocked from editing. Stop removing the advert and orphan tag before fixing them. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:17, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:20, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Fachpraca.pl moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Fachpraca.pl. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 15:19, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

June 2024
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.  Annh07 (talk) 15:14, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Tardza Project for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tardza Project is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tardza Project until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Ldm1954 (talk) 08:29, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Criollo Project for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Criollo Project is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Criollo Project until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. gidonb (talk) 02:30, 30 June 2024 (UTC)