User talk:ElijahPepe/Archives/2

Your GA nomination of Tokio (software)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tokio (software) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rjjiii -- Rjjiii (talk) 03:02, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Outline of investigations and court cases involving Donald Trump moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Outline of investigations and court cases involving Donald Trump, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 15:26, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, ElijahPepe. Thank you for your work on Joe Biden classified documents incident. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   03:01, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Wikiproject Autonomous Zones
Hi - I noticed that you closed WikiProject Council/Proposals/Autonomous Zones as meeting the minimum threshold for creation. Can I just probe that closure a bit? Wikiproject's aren't really my bag, so I'm sure that you're more familiar with the creation thresholds, but at the time when you closed the discussion, there were three 'support' !votes - one from a blocked sockpuppeteer, one from a blocked sock of the same user, and a third from a different account (five years old, but with only about 30 edits at the time). There were two 'oppose' !votes. The Wikiproject has been created, but it has had no activity since the sockpuppeteer and their socks were blocked. Did you consider these factors at the time? Cheers Girth Summit  (blether)  07:02, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I specified that the WikiProject was created when I closed it, but I didn't create it myself. If you'd like to propose deleting the WikiProject, see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council. I would not have closed the proposal as created if the project wasn't created already, and I don't think it should have been created. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 07:32, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I guess I'm asking about your comment that it had gained traction for the bare minimum to be created - what is that bare minimum, is it just one person? I'm not trying to give you a hard time, just looking to find out about what the expectations are so I can consider the case for its continued existence. Thanks Girth Summit  (blether)  10:19, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Usually six people, for your information. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 14:36, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK for 2023 Speaker of the United States House of Representatives election
-- RoySmith (talk) 12:02, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:2022 Oakland shooting
Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2022 Oakland shooting, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello
So, for the 2023 Memphis protests what im trying to say is that the protests outside of Memphis are not yet notable enough for another page, so that's why im redirecting your page, maybe when the protests outside of Memphis are notable enough you can probably move the page, for example see the 2015 Baltimore protests like the George Floyd Protests when the protests outside of Minneapolis got out of control they moved the page, so thats why im redirecting. PopularGames (talk) 02:51, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for being forthcoming about what you hope to achieve. I believe we have a communication issue here with two separate pages, and it is likely that this situation will change faster than an AfD discussion can be closed.


 * I'm not opposed to two separate pages but, I agree, there is a difficult situation here. I created my page five minutes before yours and, going off of the titles, it seems as though "2023 Memphis protests" covers exclusively protests in Memphis. I believe we should take this to another talk page to get more attention from other editors. Perhaps here? elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 02:55, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Talk:Killing of Tyre Nichols
Your closure here appears to be a wp:supervote, and generally RMs, unless nearly unopposed, last for seven days. Valereee (talk) 20:06, 29 January 2023 (UTC)


 * I'm going to agree that you probably should have let it run the whole seven days.  Iamreallygoodatcheckerst@lk 02:15, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Communication is required, @ElijahPepe. When people bring concerns to your talk page, you need to address them. Valereee (talk) 14:12, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I closed the discussion believing a conclusion was made. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 14:25, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Again, your closure appears to be a supervote, and generally Requested Moves, unless nearly unopposed, last for seven days. Valereee (talk) 14:56, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
 * @ElijahPepe, you've stopped responding again. Do you understand that the conclusion was not by any means made, as theres was significant opposition, and that the discussion should not have been closed after only a couple of days? Valereee (talk) 14:05, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 14:18, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Now that you know that, would you rethink the close? Valereee (talk) 14:18, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
 * The close is done. If I could move it back, I would. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 14:21, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Nothing's ever done. If you aren't sure how to unclose, you can go to that talk page, open a new section, and explain that you hadn't realized the discussion needed to be open for a week, and that if anyone participating there believes it should be reopened to receive a full discussion, it's fine with you. I wouldn't worry too much about getting the article moved back, that can be done if needed once there's consensus. Valereee (talk) 14:32, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Second Elizabethan era
Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Second Elizabethan era, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:2022 Northeastern University bombing
Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2022 Northeastern University bombing, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:2022 Oakland shooting


Hello, ElijahPepe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2022 Oakland shooting".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:36, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Nothing, Forever
BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 2 March 2023 (UTC) GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Automatically assessed Russian invasion of Ukraine articles


A tag has been placed on Category:Automatically assessed Russian invasion of Ukraine articles, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * The category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories. (See section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Alalch E. 13:14, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Russian invasion of Ukraine articles needing infoboxes


A tag has been placed on Category:Russian invasion of Ukraine articles needing infoboxes, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * The category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories. (See section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Alalch E. 13:16, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Russian invasion of Ukraine articles needing attention


A tag has been placed on Category:Russian invasion of Ukraine articles needing attention, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * The category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories. (See section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Alalch E. 13:16, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Second Elizabethan era


Hello, ElijahPepe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Second Elizabethan era".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:46, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:2022 Northeastern University bombing


Hello, ElijahPepe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2022 Northeastern University bombing".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:41, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tokio (software)
The article Tokio (software) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Tokio (software) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rjjiii -- Rjjiii (talk) 10:22, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you! elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 15:11, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Issue with article
Hello, On the article you created, 2023 Tennessee House of Representatives expulsions, I noticed a few things wrong.


 * The 2/3 majority is actually set by the US Constitution, not by the states.
 * The “scorecard” for Johnson is reversed if I am reading it correctly, as it seems, by what you put on it, is that the vote to remove was successful. Could you double check that?

Thanks! 2600:8801:CA05:EF00:E5D2:953:4286:1D6F (talk) 01:06, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The scorecard is correct. The vote to remove Johnson failed because of one vote. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 01:40, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, ElijahPepe. Thank you for your work on Nothing, Forever. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   03:37, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, ElijahPepe. Thank you for your work on 2023 Nevada air ambulance crash. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   15:49, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, ElijahPepe. Thank you for your work on 2020 Georgia election investigation. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   17:02, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, ElijahPepe. Thank you for your work on 2023 Matamoros kidnappings. User:Tails Wx, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Tails  Wx  18:43, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, ElijahPepe. Thank you for your work on Acquisition of WWE by Endeavor. User:Tails Wx, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Tails  Wx  18:07, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Acquisition of WWE by Endeavor for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Acquisition of WWE by Endeavor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Acquisition of WWE by Endeavor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 22:08, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jack Teixeira.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Jack Teixeira.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Map
Do you have a source saying that the Sudan Revolutionary Front still controls that big of an area in 2023? Surely the news would be talking about it if it still controlled that much? Wowzers122 (talk) 17:44, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dave Brubeck
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dave Brubeck you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MrLinkinPark333 -- MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 17:22, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dave Brubeck
The article Dave Brubeck you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Dave Brubeck for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MrLinkinPark333 -- MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 17:43, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

New message from Narutolovehinata5
 Naruto love hinata 5 (talk · contributions) 11:52, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of 2023 United States migrant surge for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2023 United States migrant surge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2023 United States migrant surge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Esolo5002 (talk) 18:13, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:History of Twitter (October 2022–present)
Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:History of Twitter (October 2022–present), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:03, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Please document new parameters
When you add a parameter to a template, please also add it to the documentation, with an explanation of how the new parameter works. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:12, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Saw at Talk:2023 United States East Coast wildfire smoke that you're in the hospital. I hope you are well (or get well soon).

Wracking talk! 23:05, 7 June 2023 (UTC) 

DYK nomination of Bob Lee (businessman)
Hello! Your submission of Bob Lee (businessman) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 21:04, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/United States documents leak of the Russian invasion of Ukraine
Your input is still needed on this nomination.  Naruto love hinata 5 (talk · contributions) 09:17, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:History of Twitter (October 2022–present)


Hello, ElijahPepe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "History of Twitter".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:22, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

DYK nomination of United States documents leak of the Russian invasion of Ukraine
Hello! Your submission of United States documents leak of the Russian invasion of Ukraine at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 00:24, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of 2023 Reddit API controversy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2023 Reddit API controversy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2023 Reddit API controversy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. 1keyhole (talk) 05:06, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

WP:3RR violation on Wagner Group mutiny
Hi, this is a message to notify you that you have made more than 3 reverts within the past 24 hours on an article. Please refrain from making any further reverts as this violates Wikipedia's rules about edit warring. Ecrusized (talk) 03:25, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

2023 Battle of Moscow
Hello,

Just wanting to let you know that I categorized the article for a speedy deletion too after seing that it was unusable since they agreed to a deal, it seems so I support this endeavour.

Cordially, AgisdeSparte (talk) 20:33, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

2023 riots in France
I suspect, as one of the principal authors of the Yellow Vests protests entry, that I could probably be useful on this entry. However, I've noticed that you have become quite attached to the entry, to the point where you've already broken the 3-revert rule in the last hour:


 * 21:53
 * 22:04
 * 22:06
 * 22:46

I would be happy to collaborate, but do not wish to join a battleground. (There's plenty of that downstairs...) -- SashiRolls 🌿 ·     🍥 23:01, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
 * The three-revert rule does not apply to vandalism, which the fourth link was. The third link was antithetical to what was being discussed in the talk page. This is not 3RR, and simultaneously boasting your accomplishments is not professional. I explained why the one-sentence paragraphs were not useful. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 23:14, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) at 22:46 you reverted a sourced, good-faith edit.  2) It is useful to separate subjects, in order to expand upon them.  It is a first step, not a final step. 3) Please remain cordial, the reference to YVM was to suggest that perhaps you might listen before you "explain".   --  SashiRolls 🌿 ·     🍥 23:22, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
 * 22:46 destroyed the infobox. No expanding needs to be done. This is a background section. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 23:23, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

DYK
Howdy! Your DYK at Template:Did you know nominations/United States documents leak of the Russian invasion of Ukraine seems close to the finish line so I am trying to rescue it. Feel free to swing by and take a look. Also not sure if it'd be weird or not, but feel free to add me to the DYK credit if you want. If not no worries. Happy editing. – Novem Linguae (talk) 10:35, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 14:38, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Notice: Third opinion
Hi ElijahPepe, I am sending you this as a notice that I am seeking a third opinion for the use of "riots" along with "protest" for the infobox on Nahel Merzouk protests, due to a lack of mutual communication between us on the talk page. Third opinion Jokojis (talk) 20:12, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

DYK for 2022–2023 Pentagon document leaks
Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Threads screenshot.png
Thanks for uploading File:Threads screenshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, ElijahPepe. Thank you for your work on Threads (app). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   04:10, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Draft conflict
It appears that there has been a reduplication of efforts. Draft:2023 SAG-AFTRA strike has already existed for some hours now, with several contributors. Why did you create an article that already had a draft? 〜 Festucalex  •  talk  19:16, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
 * There is nothing against creating an article with a draft. The draft was less in-depth and used less reliable sources. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 19:23, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Oh well. I'm a bit annoyed that all my effort is down the drain now. Wikipedia is a collaborative effort, and that's why I think you should have improved the draft if you found it to be insufficient. 〜 Festucalex  •  talk  19:25, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I used some of the sources from that draft. It was not futile. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 19:28, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Oh, so you actually saw the draft and decided to start a new one? That's worse. According to WP:DRAFTS: . 〜 Festucalex  •  talk  19:30, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm dropping the matter, but I want you to know that I'm very frustrated. Hours of my time have been completely wasted because of this. 〜 Festucalex  •  talk  21:11, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
 * EP, I have to agree with festucalex that this was at minimum a breach of etiquette and kind of rude. Creating a page when there's already a draft currently being worked on is duplicative work, and using their sources takes credit for their work and denies them any recognition for that work. If this is something you think is perfectly fine, I disagree. The better option is to go help on the draft. Valereee (talk) 10:06, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Close paraphrasing and source misrepresentation
Hi, ElijahPepe, I've removed a few sentences you'd written at 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike because they were too close to the wording of the original source. While paraphrasing sources is allowed, please be careful to not do so too closely, as the resulting text can still be a copyright violation. Furthermore, what you had written misrepresented the source in an important way: Vox is saying that shows such as those are an example of the broader problem with streaming shows, whereas you implied it was an issue writers had singled out. Both close paraphrasing and source misrepresentation are easy mistakes to fall into from time to time, but also very important things to get right, so please beware of these going forward. Thanks. -- Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 17:45, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Arrest of Evan Gershkovich.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Arrest of Evan Gershkovich.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 21:19, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

The flickr source includes the credit line "Photo by Kirill KUDRYAVTSEV / AFP" for the photo. AFP is a commercial news and photo agency. -- Whpq (talk) 21:20, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I am aware, which is why the photo is intentionally low quality. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 21:22, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Images from commercial agencies are subject to speedy deletion WP:F7 because they do not meet WP:NFCC. WP:NFCC has nothing to do with this. -- Whpq (talk) 21:27, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Source
How can I access this source? Thanks, TrangaBellam (talk) 16:06, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

France riots
Riots are violent. Protests are peaceful. What is happening in france is not peaceful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:6C40:7100:2041:918D:CBB7:FCEA:67B2 (talk) 17:49, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Federal Prosecution of Donald Trump (2020 election Case)
Hi ElijahPepe, I undid your revision on Federal prosecution of Donald Trump (2020 election case) because on July 27, a superseding indictment was filed against Trump in the classified documents case, so he’s been federally indicted three times, not two. Opm581 (talk) 03:19, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
 * The superseding indictment doesn't add to the counter. It's three indictments. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 03:37, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok, I’ll restore your edit. Opm581 (talk) 03:47, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Elon Musk vs. Mark Zuckerberg
Aoidh (talk) 00:03, 6 August 2023 (UTC) GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Widevine
The article Widevine you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Widevine and Talk:Widevine/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 03:21, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Widevine
The article Widevine you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Widevine for comments about the article, and Talk:Widevine/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 03:41, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Courage to Be Free
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Courage to Be Free you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 20:43, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Courage to Be Free
The article The Courage to Be Free you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Courage to Be Free and Talk:The Courage to Be Free/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 21:41, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Courage to Be Free
The article The Courage to Be Free you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Courage to Be Free for comments about the article, and Talk:The Courage to Be Free/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Thebiguglyalien -- Thebiguglyalien (talk) 03:40, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Contentious topics.  SPECIFICO talk 14:27, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Weiss special counsel page
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please do not continue to reinsert contested BLP and American Politics content into this article page. Use the article talk page to seek consensus for your proposed text.  SPECIFICO</b> talk 14:40, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tucker Carlson Tonight
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tucker Carlson Tonight you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Spinixster -- Spinixster (talk) 10:43, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Your AfD for Linus Sebastian
... was obviously unnecessary and was also a colossal waste of time for several people. I hope you use better judgement in the future before starting such efforts. You clearly know there was only one outcome for that action - and makes it look like you have an axe to grind or an agenda. Picard&#39;s Facepalm (talk) 14:39, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
 * An article with two reliable sources, especially a person, doesn't need to exist. I have no relation to the Gamers Nexus feud. Before writing comments like this on people's talk pages, I suggest laying off the hostility, or you may end up yearning for the ability to edit at all. No excuse for the passive aggressive comment you left, this is blatantly a personal attack. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 14:45, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
 * WP:SOFIXIT would apply, long before calling for the whacking the article entirely. As demonstrated in the AfD discussion - there is endless RS material to support the subject's notoriety. It would have taken less effort to google that than it took you to make the AfD. Yes - without question the article needs improving. But as evident by numerous commenters in the AfD - it borders on the obscene to request deletion. You left many heads being scratched with that one. I never mentioned anything about GN... I was thinking a much broader scope for your unfounded action.  Interesting that you did mention it though... *pondering*. Anyhow - as for hostility and personal attacks - believe me you will know if I am making them. I simply made comments about your recent activity regarding that article when both the outcome and the fix were so obvious and readily available, but I digress. However - I will advise that I do not take kindly to people directing their violations of WP:THREATEN towards me - veiled or otherwise. Let's not have another unnecessary escalation this week, okay? Picard&#39;s Facepalm (talk) 15:05, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
 * @ElijahPepe Linus Sebastian has had articles made about him in The Verge, Kotaku, The New York Times, Dexeto, and many others. He is clearly notable as a person, you not finding it notable is your issue, not that of Wikipedia’s, and does NOT in any way warrant the AfD. Don’t create useless AfDs. And for the record, what Picard says does not constitute a personal attack. They are just pointing out that you should not unnecessarily create AfDs. - Evelyn Harthbrooke (leave a message · contributions) 18:26, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
 * The argument does not surround whether or not Sebastian has received media coverage, the argument is about whether or not he has extended media coverage. A passing mention in The Verge or The New York Times doesn't make a person notable. There is little that you can state about Sebastian that can't be merged into the Linus Media Group article. "Useless" AfDs are not AfDs that you disagree with. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 22:26, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
 * @ElijahPepe There are full blown articles in The Verge and New York Times dedicated sorely to Sebastian. I've followed LTT and Sebastian for literally years. He's received a lot of news coverage over the years. You clearly have not done much research on this. - Evelyn Harthbrooke (leave a message · contributions) 00:23, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * An article in The Verge and The New York Times alone is not going to suffice for establishing notability; accusing me of not doing my research is yet another personal attack. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 00:46, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * @ElijahPepe They were merely examples. I can mention other sources as well, like Forbes, NME, PC Gamer, and others. Merging the Linus Sebastian article with Linus Media Group will just add unnecessary content to the article, as he is no longer the CEO and, as such, no longer the most prominent face of LMG. There's a reason the two articles are separate, and as such, I still believe your AfD was unnecessary, not to mention made directly in the middle of controverises surrounding LMG, which is in poor taste and makes Wikipedia look bad. - Evelyn Harthbrooke (leave a message · contributions) 01:39, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Watch out using Forbes for notability; PC Gamer has no reliability established for it and should not be used either. I have nothing to gain or lose, and neither does Wikipedia. Optics are irrelevant when an article needs to be desperately merged. Whether or not LMG is embroiled and marred in controversy is not my concern and does not change how the AfD is presented. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 01:45, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * @ElijahPepe For the record, your second claim regarding PC Gamer is false, per WP:VG/S, as PC Gamer is heavily PC and video game centric and is typically where PC Gamer as a source is used, but can be used for other articles as PC Gamer also covers technology in some cases. Please check more than just WP:RSP before coming to conclusions. Anyways, your AfD was already closed under WP:SNOW and the fact that you filed it right in the middle of an LMG / Linus Sebastian controversy. - Evelyn Harthbrooke (leave a message · contributions) 01:54, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Also, the article can be improved to contain more details and information, and to cite more sources. An AfD is genuinely just unnecessary due to that. - Evelyn Harthbrooke (leave a message · contributions) 01:57, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

A user mentioned you on ANI
In case you weren't aware, a user mentioned you on ANI. Best -- Rockstone Send me a message!  03:18, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

iPhone 15
Thanks for Adding stuff for this article, Thank you so much. TonyJrVSG (talk) 18:02, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Sludge content
I see that you've merged Sludge content into Copyright infringement and social media. While I do think that the copyright violations article should mention sludge content, copyright violations seem to be a minor part of it, so I'm on the fence on whether the article should be merged. What do you think? — Panamitsu (talk) Please ping on reply 22:54, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I agree with your sentiments, but I'm still not sure that sludge content deserves a separate article. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 00:06, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Could you please clarify? It'd be nice to see your point of view. — Panamitsu (talk) Please ping on reply 09:13, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted
Hi ElijahPepe, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing!  Schwede 66  23:31, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Edit warring on the WGA strike article
Take a look at what actress Justine Bateman posted on X: https://twitter.com/JustineBateman/status/1706133265206382700. Does that clear things up? So just because people stopped picketing does not indicate the end of the strike. Like I said, the strike is over when the guild says it is officially over. Until then, there is still technically a strike going on. Are we clear? - Jasonbres (talk) 03:06, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

Apologies
My apology for having caused you to waste time and effort at 2023 United States federal government shutdown. The sources were reporting that the situation was all but inevitable, as it was just before McCarthy proposed to negotiate with House Democrats.  starship .paint  (RUN) 13:28, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Absolutely okay. I had also planned on there being a shutdown and had a draft in a text file prepared with background information. Ultimately, the work I did was used in the budget article, so there was no extra work on anyone's part. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 14:22, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your understanding. Indeed, after this happened, and with your talk page summary, it dawned on me that I could have used draftspace. Good job on figuring that out!  starship .paint  (RUN) 14:36, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Proposed rename of Efforts to remove Kevin McCarthy
Hi! I've proposed a name change on an article you've created: Efforts to remove Kevin McCarthy. I'd love your input on the article's talk page Thanks! MicrobiologyMarcus (talk) 14:50, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of 2023 Gaza war for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2023 Gaza war is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2023 Gaza war until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.  Abo Yemen ✉  13:38, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello! I was curious about an aspect of an article you wrote.
The article in question Wikipedia coverage of Donald Trump was published on April Fool's Day. Was this intentional? Americanfreedom (talk) 13:21, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
 * No. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 17:18, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

haha
beat me to the punch for the speaker article haha, good on you AbiquiúBoy (talk) 17:50, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Outline of investigations and court cases involving Donald Trump
Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Outline of investigations and court cases involving Donald Trump, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:04, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Coords
You seem to have pointed the coordinates for the 2023 Lewiston shootings at some random person's house. Given that there were two locations, maybe there shouldn't be any coordinates shown? Abductive (reasoning) 05:47, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
 * The coordinates are intentional as the midpoint between the two shootings so that the map can display them both properly. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 19:16, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I rounded them but more importantly removed them from the title. Abductive  (reasoning) 20:26, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Election denial movement for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Election denial movement is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Election denial movement until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. rootsmusic (talk) 03:50, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Please work on the draft-space article Draft:Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip
Hey ElijahPepe. I wanted to let you know that Draft:Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip was created yesterday to not violate WP:FUTURE, given the Israeli ground invasion hasn't begun, or at least, not enough RS say it has begun. I saw you previously worked on the now redirect stub 2023 Israeli invasion of Gaza, so I wanted to suggest you could work on the draft-space article. Also, I wanted to note the stub-article title was wrong in general (Gaza Strip, not Gaza), plus it violated WP:FUTURE. So yeah, the draft-space article can be worked on and improved prior to the invasion, so when the invasion does occur, it is start/C class rather than a stub article. Cheers! The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 22:53, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 04:48, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

"Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Israeli_invasion_of_the_Gaza_Strip&redirect=no Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. — Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 00:08, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tucker Carlson Tonight
The article Tucker Carlson Tonight you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Tucker Carlson Tonight and Talk:Tucker Carlson Tonight/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Spinixster -- Spinixster (talk) 11:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tucker Carlson Tonight
The article Tucker Carlson Tonight you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tucker Carlson Tonight for comments about the article, and Talk:Tucker Carlson Tonight/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Spinixster -- Spinixster (talk) 01:42, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Removal of Sam Altman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Removal of Sam Altman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Removal of Sam Altman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. BangJan1999 18:10, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Please slow it down
Hi there. This morning, when I was reading about the OpenAI drama that's going on, I suddenly wondered if someone would have been tempted to create an article about it. I then had a second thought: if they did, chances were that you would be the article creator. I logged onto Wikipedia, searched "firing of Sam Altman" (so close!), and indeed — there was an article created by you, and as I had guessed, it had been nominated for AfD. While your dedication to article creation is greatly appreciated, please consider slowing it down when it comes to creating articles about current events, which I know you are prolific in. Consider WP:NEVENT, WP:10YEAR, and especially WP:NOTNEWS. Thank you. InfiniteNexus (talk) 17:56, 20 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I concur with @InfiniteNexus. By coincidence, I came to this talk page to post the exact same concern. Removal of Sam Altman, and other articles such as Efforts to remove Kevin McCarthy are 1) clearly out of step with our best practices for naming and titles, which you should be aware of by now and 2) questionable in terms of notability, and would best be brought up on the relevant talk pages first as a proposal, rather than an abrupt fork. In the spirit of collaboration, please consider these points first before just starting a new article. It will save lots of grief and wasted time in requested move or Articles for Deletion debates. - Fuzheado &#124; Talk 13:19, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Outline of investigations and court cases involving Donald Trump


Hello, ElijahPepe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Outline of investigations and court cases involving Donald Trump".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 01:03, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of 2023 Rainbow Bridge explosion for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2023 Rainbow Bridge explosion, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/2023 Rainbow Bridge explosion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Deletion of February 2024 New York's 3rd congressional district election
Request deletion of this redirect as page "2024 New York's 3rd congressional district special election" is already up. Check your contributions! Type db-g7 inside –  in that redirect then save. Santiago Claudio (talk) 02:13, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

PROD for Tornado outbreak of December 9, 2023
I was sad to see you reverted my redirect. I redirected it to the yearly article because a draft-article was already in the making (Draft:Tornado outbreak of December 9, 2023). I even explained that in the redirect message. I have now placed a PROD on the article and would like to ask if I may re-redirect the article and let the much better-shape draft replace it in the future. Basically, I also think an outbreak article is warrented, but the current draft-article was created first and is in a whole lot better shape than the stub you reverted back. Please, let me re-redirect it (cancelling the PROD) and let the better-shape draft get ready for mainspace. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 03:03, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
 * If the flow of information is greater in a separate article, there's nothing particularly disheartening about unredirecting it, and I mean zero ill-intentions. I read that you are honoring WP:0RR. At your discretion, you may redirect it again, as are alternative avenues; note that this is a developing situation that is garnering notability. You may also copy your content into the existing article. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 03:39, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
 * I went ahead and re-did the redirect. If I was the only editor, I would have just copied it in. However, seven other editors have edited the draft article, so I couldn't just copy/paste it over to mainspace without the article history being merged, which is a little bit of a hassle to do. Either way, I really thank you for letting me redirect it. It wasn't because I don't think it should be an article, just rather that several other editors had been working on this particular draft, so the 1-sentence mainspace article you made just complicated things a little bit. Once again, thank you! Feel free to help out on the draft: Draft:Tornado outbreak of December 9, 2023! Cheers! The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 03:48, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
 * If other editors are working on that draft in a significant manner, a history merge is likely necessary. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 03:50, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Precious
You are recipient no. 2899 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:53, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Community Task Force
Hello I've been putting together a task force for the show community and thought you might be intrested given your contributions to Jeff Winger Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 19:41, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Invitation

 * Hello, we need experienced volunteers.
 * New Page Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles. We could use a few extra hands on deck if you think you can help.
 * Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines ; Wikipedia needs experienced users to perform this task and there are precious few with the appropriate skills. Even a couple reviews a day can make a huge difference.
 * Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision (if it looks daunting, don't worry, it basically boils down to checking CSD, notability, and title). If this looks like something that you can do, please consider joining us.
 * If you would like to join the project and help out, please see the granting conditions. You can apply for the user-right HERE.
 * If you have questions, please feel free to drop a message at the reviewer's discussion board.
 * Cheers, and hope to see you around.

Sent by NPP Coordination using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele)
Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 22 December 2023 (UTC) GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Apple Watch health monitoring patent dispute for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Apple Watch health monitoring patent dispute is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Apple Watch health monitoring patent dispute until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. InfiniteNexus (talk) 01:37, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Lloyd Austin hospitalization controversy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lloyd Austin hospitalization controversy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lloyd Austin hospitalization controversy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. KINGofLETTUCE 👑 🥬 21:18, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PCN02WPS -- PCN02WPS (talk) 05:01, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele)
The article Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele) and Talk:Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PCN02WPS -- PCN02WPS (talk) 05:21, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele)
The article Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele) for comments about the article, and Talk:Substitute Teacher (Key & Peele)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PCN02WPS -- PCN02WPS (talk) 07:42, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of 2024 Beechcraft Bonanza V35 crash for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Beechcraft Bonanza V35 crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2024 Beechcraft Bonanza V35 crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 13:19, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nytimes.com, January 2, 2024.png
Thanks for uploading File:Nytimes.com, January 2, 2024.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:38, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024
Hello, I'm Soni. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to The New York Times have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Soni (talk) 02:18, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Blanking out entire sections just because you don't agree with others is vandalism. Please do not do that. (I have not reverted you again out of respect for WP:3RR and similar policies, but the point stands regardless) Soni (talk) 02:21, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Blanking out sections is not vandalism, and having empty sections is acceptable. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 02:22, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

"Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Israeli_invasion_of_the_Gaza_Strip&redirect=no Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Elli (talk &#124; contribs) 15:21, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

NY Times
Hey.

I saw that you've just created Critical reception of The New York Times and Online platforms of The New York Times. I'm glad that you think these are good suggestion, but right now what would be most helpful is if you express that support on the article talk page. The scope and a rough outline of each of those articles needs to be planned out, especially for the critical reception article as that will require careful integration of both the positive and negative reception to the paper. There are multiple editors there who want to help, and we all have our own strengths to bring in this regard. The best way this can be done is if we all work together on this, and that we're all working from the same plan.

You cannot be the sole arbiter of article content or scope in this regard, per policy no one editor has ownership of an article and its content. Continuing along this path of asserting how things will be done, and not engaging with the concerns or proposals made by others on the article talk page has pretty much only one outcome. That is something I'd really like to avoid as you are a good and productive editor, you're just not engaging in any form of collaboration with others.

Please start engaging with us on the talk page. Help us plan out all of the articles involved, and identify areas where each of us can play to our strengths as editors. You don't have to do this alone. If we do this right, there are multiple GAs and FAs we can create from this content. Sideswipe9th (talk) 20:13, 10 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Elijah please, don't make any more edits to the article, or the sub-articles for the next couple of days. Let's make a plan on the talk page so that we can all work on this together. Will you please do this? Sideswipe9th (talk) 21:13, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I certainly plan to expand the ledes and would really prefer to start working on the virtual reality section tomorrow. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 21:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 * How about instead of doing that, you suggest your plans on the talk page? That way we can see if other editors agree with them, or perhaps there's another way to structure the content that you haven't thought of. Don't frame it in terms of "this is what needs to be done" as you did in, or "I have determined" as you did in . Remember, collaboration is what makes good articles, and framing it in those absolute terms encourage collaboration. Instead you should make suggestions, ask people how the feel about structuring content in a certain way, and leave it open ended so that others can give feedback and suggest alternatives that might be better than what you think of.
 * It's going to be a lot easier to collaborate with those of us who are willing now than with the feedback you'll get during a GA and/or FA review. Sideswipe9th (talk) 21:50, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Adding content to a one-sentence section is not controversial . elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 00:07, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Right now we don't know if the article is going to keep that section. We haven't discussed what the structure and content of the Online platforms article will be. We don't need to be adding any more content to the main article right now while we're planning what will become of it and all of the sub-articles. The only thing we need right now is for you to start talking on the article talk page, so that we can plan this properly together. Sideswipe9th (talk) 00:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia ANI notification
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Snokalok (talk) 15:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Drawbacks
Was reading talk...I all read over Help:Transclusion if GA is the goal. Especially point 3 and 4. Moxy - 16:17, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Yes, that has been noted. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 16:20, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
 * wow ok..draft space probably best to build till ready......in the meantime expect there to be sources concerns form others . Good luck. Moxy -Maple Leaf (Pantone).svg 16:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.   Acroterion   (talk)   02:09, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * Given your responses on the talkpage and your edit-summary-less restoration after being asked to explain what you're doing (the self-revert was a good idea, the absence of explanation was not), I've blocked you from the article so you can spend the necessary time to explain what you're trying to accomplish on the talkpage and gain consensus for it.  Acroterion   (talk)   02:20, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Some feedback
I am trying to bat for you but I suspect it's impossible at this point. The disdain you have for your fellow editors, while also not actually learning from them, is too high.

My intentions to take this article to good article status are marred, not by technical inability, but by stylistic disdain. I just want you to know that the biggest obstacle in taking the article to GA has been you yourself. Other editors have taken articles to FA, you have not. And yet each time once you make a massive change (good thing!) you decide to stop discussing it (bad thing!) and start warring with everyone instead of listening to feedback (very bad thing!). All of that has resulted in an unreadable mess you made that others are fixing weeks later.

In the here and now, what should have taken three weeks is now projected to take three months. I too dislike the slow pace like any man, but you have contributed to that more than others. Others have pointed out suggestions like Draft space and talk page discussions and other ways to accommodate your editing style while letting you keep making massive changes. But instead you ignore all of them to talk down your fellow editors and decide to bicker about every change people dicuss.

I do not know if being this direct is the only way for you to learn, but here we go. I'll rather you learn and improve instead of another set of blocks or worse. Both are, however, preferable to you dissing completely reasonable blocks that give you too much rope. Soni (talk) 04:43, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I hold no vitriol against any of the editors in that talk page. I have attempted to construct the greatest possible article, and I could not achieve that without the work of other editors. Unfortunately, my intentions have been misconstrued; I'm seeking understanding for everyone here. This article is reaching the level of incongruency that had adversely affected the article prior to the rewrite and the work that I had done to standardize it has been disregarded with my perspective. My work has not been appreciated—certainly not now, and it will likely not be me who takes this article to good or featured article, then. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 05:25, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of 2028 Democratic Party presidential primaries for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2028 Democratic Party presidential primaries is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2028 Democratic Party presidential primaries until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Esolo5002 (talk) 23:27, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of 2028 Republican Party presidential primaries for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2028 Republican Party presidential primaries is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2028 Republican Party presidential primaries until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Esolo5002 (talk) 23:28, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Trump v. United States (2024) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trump v. United States (2024) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Trump v. United States (2024) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Reywas92Talk 03:05, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Initial public offering of Arm Holdings for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Initial public offering of Arm Holdings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Initial public offering of Arm Holdings until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. EditorInTheRye (talk) 07:48, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Disney–Charter Communications dispute
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Disney–Charter Communications dispute you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MovieTalk101178 -- MovieTalk101178 (talk) 22:43, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Akira Toriyama in 1982.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Akira Toriyama in 1982.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  Liliana UwU  (talk / contributions) 23:28, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Disney–Charter Communications dispute
The article Disney–Charter Communications dispute you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Disney–Charter Communications dispute for comments about the article, and Talk:Disney–Charter Communications dispute/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MovieTalk101178 -- MovieTalk101178 (talk) 17:21, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of History of The New York Times (1851–1896)
The article History of The New York Times (1851–1896) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:History of The New York Times (1851–1896) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 750h+ -- 750h+ (talk) 04:02, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of History of The New York Times (1896–1945)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article History of The New York Times (1896–1945) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 750h+ -- 750h+ (talk) 04:41, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of History of The New York Times (1896–1945)
The article History of The New York Times (1896–1945) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:History of The New York Times (1896–1945) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 750h+ -- 750h+ (talk) 05:45, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

"reverted for having no summary"
Elijah, addressing this here because it's not something to discuss on an article talk page. You have been asked repeatedly to provide edit summaries for the changes you make to articles. You were temporarily page blocked on for making substantive edits to the NYT article without discussion or provided explanation, despite requests from multiple editors including admins to do so. You are not being held to a standard that other editors aren't, because according to policy all edits should be explained (unless the reason for them is obvious)—either by clear edit summaries, or by discussion on the associated talk page.

Respectfully, you are treating the NYT series of articles as though they are your own personal solo project. However Wikipedia, as I and others have explained to you multiple times now, is not a personal solo project. It is a group project. That means you need to discuss changes with other editors, seek consensus for those changes, allow others to critique and adjust those plans if consensus determines they need adjusting, and respect whatever consensus forms even if you fundamentally disagree with it. Discussion on article content is how Wikipedia works and it is mandatory in some form or another.

Please stop making these insinuations about other editors, because the issue here I'm sad to say is solely a result of your conduct. Sideswipe9th (talk) 03:18, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Removal of Sam Altman from OpenAI
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Removal of Sam Altman from OpenAI you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mokadoshi -- Mokadoshi (talk) 03:42, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nytimes.com, February 2, 2024.png
Thanks for uploading File:Nytimes.com, February 2, 2024.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Boeing manufacturing issues
Do you plan on adding information to Boeing manufacturing issues about aircraft other than the 737 MAX? If not, then it might be a good idea to merge the article with Boeing 737 MAX at this time. - ZLEA  T \ C 05:42, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
 * It's not my article. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 05:46, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I just wanted to ask since you contributed a majority of the content. Given the current scope of the article, I will go ahead with a merge discussion. -  ZLEA  T \ C 05:55, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I reject a merge discussion. The scope has been established. Contributing most of the content does not mean this is my article. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 18:27, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm not making WP:OWN accusations, if that's what you're implying. You did, however, create the article and contribute most of its content, so I was hoping to determine what you originally intended the scope to be.  Next time, you might consider creating the article as a draft to allow others to help write it before being moved to the mainspace.  Whatever you intended the scope to be, the article currently only covers manufacturing issues with the 737 MAX, and I have seen no one has express interest in expanding the scope to other Boeing types in the near future.  Therefore, I believe it is best to merge with Boeing 737 MAX until someone is prepared to write the article to cover similar issues with more Boeing types. -  ZLEA  T \ C 19:32, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Where is Kate? for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Where is Kate? is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. IgnatiusofLondon ( he/him • ☎️) 11:37, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

One sentence articles
Please do not create one sentence articles like you did with Assassination of Mohammad Reza Zahedi. Wikipedia needs to strive to reach a quality and this seriously falls short of that. If you intended to expand on it, please do so first before linking your page to heavily edited articles. Ecrusized (talk) 18:21, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
 * The editing process works best when an article is out there and can be expanded by others in real-time, rather than one editor writing content independently. There is no assumption that the article will permanently be one sentence, and I have always linked to articles first to gather editors. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 18:25, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

My bad
Thanks for catching my mistake on 2024 in California - I didn't realize that was a link. TypoEater (talk) 13:38, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of History of The New York Times (1998–2016)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article History of The New York Times (1998–2016) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:40, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act
 Schwede 66  12:03, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of History of The New York Times (1998–2016)
The article History of The New York Times (1998–2016) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:History of The New York Times (1998–2016) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:03, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
 * You failed to provide where the close paraphrasing was. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 19:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
 * There is a table with an example at the top of the review. &#126;~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:59, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I handled the example. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 20:24, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act
Thank you for your work on the article so far on the article. I have also begun putting some work into it and think that I had potential for a DYK and when the senate gets around to it a In the News item. Would you be interested in colaborating on the article to get it a DYK nom, I ask this as I am participating in the Wikicup and both of those could score me some good points. Feel free to decline, Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 19:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I personally do not see the point in points, but any help is welcome. If I were to comment on your writing style, include a few commas. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 21:37, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The points are for the competition WP:CUP  Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 23:11, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Good news it was approved! Very quickly as well Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 06:20, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Would you be interested in presuing a GA for this article? Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 18:42, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Good idea, though I would hold off on nominating until Maria Cantwell's provisions are implemented. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 16:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is ElijahPepe New York Times issues. Thank you. Sideswipe9th (talk) 20:24, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of 2024 New Jersey earthquake for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 New Jersey earthquake is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2024 New Jersey earthquake until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.  Liliana UwU  (talk / contributions) 21:30, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Conan O'Brien Needs a Doctor While Eating Spicy Wings
The article Conan O'Brien Needs a Doctor While Eating Spicy Wings you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Conan O'Brien Needs a Doctor While Eating Spicy Wings for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Generalissima -- Generalissima (talk) 19:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of 2023 Nevada air ambulance crash for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2023 Nevada air ambulance crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2023 Nevada air ambulance crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 13:02, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Conan O&#39;Brien Needs a Doctor While Eating Spicy Wings.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Conan O&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:21, 21 April 2024 (UTC)