User talk:Jauerback/Archives/2008

"We Are Robin Hood!" Edit
Thank you for your message. I understand that I went about challenging the Robin Hood episode article in the wrong way, and appreciate that you (or someone) has now updated the page to reflect the fact that it contains unsupported statements. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.140.7.94 (talk) 16:20, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Majin Tantei Nōgami Neuro
Hi. You recently reverted an edit by 163.153.64.30 (It is not one that I made. I've been monitoring the anonymous edits from that range of addresses), and warned them about vandalism. I am not familiar with the series, but given that the section is titled "777 Tools of Hell", could it be possible that the edit was valid? --NERIC-Security (talk) 19:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Anytime. Thanks for taking a second look.--NERIC-Security (talk) 20:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

thanks for the barnstar
Sorry for taking a bit to get back to you, I've been a bit backlogged. Anyway, thanks for the barnstar (my first one). See you around the 'pedia. -Fcb981(talk:contribs) 02:19, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

excuse me!
i am not experimenting. this link was sitting on the page for many months until it was conveniently removed 2 weeks ago without any explanations. i am merely restoring the valid content. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.252.75.236 (talk) 15:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Please stop adding inappropriate links to this article. Jauerback (talk) 15:57, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the assist. I've left another complaint with admin Jj137 - Jvhertum (talk) 16:08, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films December 2007 Newsletter
The December 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:48, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

luke wiles
who are you to change that stuff? i only put in fact!

mind your business unless you know its wrong! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.143.158.98 (talk) 19:47, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Truth is not Vandalism!!!
what are talking about? i know luke wiles, i am from Orillia! Who died and made you WikiGod? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.143.158.98 (talk) 19:57, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Raj Mundra
I added a quote which was removed, my source for Lise Meitner's quotes is (Cornwell, Hitler's Scientists, 411) following:
 * You all worked for Nazi Germany. And you tried to offer only a passive resistance. Certainly, to buy off your conscience you helped here and there a persecuted person, but millions of innocent human beings were allowed to be murdered without any kind of protest being uttered... [it is said that] first you betrayed your friends, then your children in that you let them stake their lives on a criminal war - and finally that you betrayed Germany itself, because when the war was already quite hopeless, you did not once arm yourselves against the senseless destruction of Germany. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.23.63.22 (talk) 20:41, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Luke Wiles
I'd like to know your criteria for deleting edited info. What source is backing up the claim "h posses exceptional talent on and off the floor"? or also know as "the Show"?

what is your personal problem? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.143.158.98 (talk) 20:27, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * First of all, thanks for pointing that out. I've edited the article to reflect that. I didn't read the entire article, only the changes that you kept making. However, you have got to be kidding me that you truly believe your addition of, "Hails from Orillia, Ontario, Canada! One of the Boyz! He stink at poker tho! (stop deleting this!)" is encyclopedic material? It's fine to put in his hometown (with a source), but I won't even bother addressing the rest of that.Jauerback (talk) 20:47, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

James LeBron Insulting My Race
Good sir.

Dragons are held as sacred as Jesus, if not God Himself, in China, my homeland.

We Chinese have the very Blood of Dragons in our veins.

With all due respect, I hope you're not proposing that what James LeBron did wasn't an evil insult to the pride of our race? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Regretful Wombat (talk • contribs) 14:17, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not suggesting anything about LeBron James' actions, however you definitely added defamatory comments to the article that are WP:OR and extremely WP:POV and would be considered libel per WP:BLP. Jauerback (talk) 14:27, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

dude...
I did not vandalize user:zlesliez. He asked me to do that since he has no idea how to do things on the wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Llamadog903 (talk • contribs) 16:12, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I deleted the warning from your page. My apologies.  Jauerback (talk) 18:52, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Zychlin
Hi Jauerback,

I created the Zychlin site in the first place! I didn't understand why information about the city was added to an entry for the Hasidic dynasty! I was trying to separate the information, the city info from the dynasty. The changes I made where to the site that I created. I don't know what authority you have but threatening me for changing a page that I created is insulting to say the lest, especially when other people added information that has no relevance to the page that I was creating. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yatziv (talk • contribs) 18:05, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
 * You were deleting large portions of the article without an edit summary, so there is no way to tell what your intentions were. Also, just because you created the article, does not make it yours.  Did you discuss any of your deletions on the article's talk page first so a consensus could be reached?  Perhaps some other editors(s) felt the additions were relevant.  I'm not here to judge that.  However, all I saw were mass deletions of text without explanation.  I reverted those.  Jauerback (talk) 18:51, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Thnx for the offer
Thnx for offering to help. I was not having issues editing. I was trying to erase the city information from the article I posted. After reading your letter, it does seem to be better to have created a page for the city too. For your information, more people would be interested in the dynasty then some hole in the wall town from Poland. LOL Anyway Thanks again

As for the help, I would like to add a picture in the Grand Rabbi's section how would you go about doing it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yatziv (talk • contribs) 00:55, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Brian Sewell
Apologies for the editing on the Brian Sewell article, perhaps a case of the over-zealous.

82.46.33.94

10-01-2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.46.33.94 (talk • contribs) 19:55, 10 Jan 2008

Dianne Haskett
If you have something to contribute, please discuss it on the talk page rather than simply reverting my edits without explanation. Carolynparrishfan (talk) 21:30, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I apologize, I didn't realize that this tag didn't go on your talk page, however I have reverted my edit.  I misread what you added.  Jauerback (talk) 01:50, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Adnan Ghalib
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 09:48, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Warnings
Thanks for your message. I'm running into problems with the program that I am using when I try to do both a roll back and a warn at the same time (if the roll back fails due to someone else reverting it first, the software still puts up a duplicated user warning, one from the successful roll back, and one from me). Any suggestions as to software that works well for you? Igoldste (talk) 23:12, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Buster Gonad
I'm surprised that you've proposed that this item be deleted. Are you also going to delete the dozens of other Viz cartoon items? Deleting it is a mistake. It should be left as is.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Viz_comic_strips —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nabokov (talk • contribs) 19:05, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you should participate in the discussion with your reasoning rather than voicing your opinion on my talk page. Jauerback (talk) 19:14, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Just cos


has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Trucks
Bud, trucks ruul ≥≥≥≥≥≥ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Transdoodlers (talk • contribs) 14:29, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
 * That's great, however you don't need to add that kind of opinion to an article. Jauerback (talk) 14:49, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

User:Eagleeye666
Yeah, I figured the evidence of sockpuppetry was enough based on what he said in his edits. Useight (talk) 17:20, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Yep, I noticed that. I filed a vandalism report right after, since sockpuppet reports aren't processed as quickly.  I figured that with such a small number of contributions to review, the vandalism report would suffice.  Then I noticed the note in the vandalized revision belatedly and reported it as further evidence. :) — Erik  (talk • contrib) - 17:30, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Adminship
What do you think about becoming an admininstrator? I am willing to nominate you. Let me know. Useight (talk) 17:29, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Looking at your statistics, I think you may be ready now. If you would like, we could go through a few questions first to see how good your handle on policy and procedures is. Or I could just set up a nomination page on RFA and we can see how it goes. Whatever you want to do. Useight (talk) 01:06, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I have created User:Jauerback/Admin Coaching and have listed the first three questions there. Once you've answered those, we'll go on further down the questions list. Useight (talk) 16:41, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Those were some pretty good answers. I added a couple more questions and some stuff about your experience. Useight (talk) 17:04, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I think you have a pretty good handle on stuff. I added a few more questions, the last questions I have.  I think we're pretty much ready to go to RFA. Useight (talk) 16:44, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Everything looks pretty good. I'd be surprised if your RFA didn't pass, I'll go ahead and write up a nomination and let you know when it's ready. Useight (talk) 21:38, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank You!
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage! It always makes me feel good that people somewhere are still helping each other out. Have a great day! -Mastrchf91- 02:14, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

147.72.67.66
excuse us, we have a school based ip address and immature peers are changing your website. we are sorry for this inconvenience. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.72.67.66 (talk) 15:05, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

RFA Nomination
I have gone ahead and created Requests for adminship/Jauerback with my nomination on it. To get the ball rolling, just accept the nomination, answer the questions, and transclude the RFA onto WP:RFA. Useight (talk) 23:00, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
 * It was kind of ironic, I saw that you were actively editing, so I went and created the RFA so you'd be available to accept and answer questions, but the time that I created the page (22:54) was exactly the same time you stopped editing and took a break for a couple hours and weren't online a couple minutes later when I sent you the message to tell you it was ready. So, yeah, that was a weird coincidence. Useight (talk) 01:58, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

!Voting during nomination
I think you should be fine commenting in other RFAs, just don't !vote support in all of them by copying and pasting them all in 2 minutes. That would look suspiciously like canvassing. And don't mention that you're concurrently in RFA. Other than those two guidelines, go right ahead. Useight (talk) 03:29, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Kip Hawley
Saying that Kip Hawley is an idiot is not vandalism. See the discussion page.

Since it seems to be you who keeps reverting this edit --- please identify yourself, because I suspect you have some sort of relationship to Mr. Hawley. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.226.153.25 (talk) 19:53, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Removing Edits
DIARY OF A SOUTH BEACH PARTY GIRL can be listed but not other fiction relating to South Beach? I'm confused and if you can leave an explanation, that would be great. Thanks in advance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CaridadPineiro (talk • contribs) 20:32, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Revert
Thank you for the message about reverting the Fisher College wiki page. As an employee of Fisher College, I have been trying to update our information on the Wiki site. I do not understand why that would be perceived as a form of vandalism.

Please advise,

Fisher07 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fisher07 (talk • contribs) 20:37, 22 Jan 2008
 * My reply.

curtis painter
...whatever dude...my comments were far more accurate than what you guys have posted.....

did you research what some other moron put up as Indiana cornhole????

I am a HAPPY Purdue alum, and can assure you that "game" doesn't exist...

whatever man.....peace outtie..I won't contribute any longer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mthar (talk • contribs) 04:47, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Tabula Rasa
Why did you revert my edit, it was a perfectly valid one. The Clawed One (talk) 18:24, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Signpost updated for January 21st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 23:53, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Early congrats
Looks like you're going to pass your RFA, so congratulations. When you get sysop rights, I'd recommend going through New Admin School. It's a pretty good way to practice deleting and restoring pages, along with blocking and unblocking users. If you ever have any questions about the new tools, I'm available all the time. Anyway, congratulations again and I see you did decide to use my method of linking to talk page responses. Useight (talk) 00:41, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

You are now an administrator
Congratulations, I have just closed your RfA as successful and made you an administrator. Take a look at the administrators' how-to guide and the administrators' reading list if you haven't read those already. Also, the practice exercises at the new admin school may be useful. If you have any questions, get in touch on my talk page. WjBscribe 01:50, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Congrats on your successful RFA! Oysterguitarist 04:54, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Congrats and welcome to the team. It's time to get to work now ;) --Oxymoron83 05:36, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Congrats! -- The Helpful One (Talk)(Contribs) (Review) 15:52, 26 January 2008 (UTC)


 * ME TOO! Congrats! Spencer  T♦C 20:09, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Congrats! -- Rodhullandemu  (Talk) 20:25, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes. Congrats and all the best in your new role! --Bhadani (talk) 20:28, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks and congrats to you too!! —dima/talk/ 20:43, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Congratulations and you are very welcome! --Merovingian (T, C) 07:35, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Cub
Cub55 made another Jim Harding page. Just thought you'd like to know. Basketball one ten  00:24, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Speedy Delete tag
Thanks. I put the db-move tag under the redirect so that links to the article would still function while I was waiting to be able to move the page. --Scott Alter 01:36, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

article for deletion
according to faihlessthewonderboy, these are non-notable so what is it really that you think makes them notable. i have a quote from him saying that myspace and blogs are not acceptable and that amy dumas career outside music contributes nothing to her band page yet it is still written about and their album page lists absolutely no references and they have no label, if you can not prove notability then i am truly being discriminated, i hope you have a good answer for yourself and faithlessthewondeboy because he knows know i have him backed into a corner, i am a pro with the internet, you cannot fool me so please explain notability. --SLICKFINGERS (talk) 03:54, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

i really think you should state why it is notable since we are all about proof and reference around here, because according to being notable as a band.. they have accomplished nothing. --SLICKFINGERS (talk) 04:00, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

haha, trying to challenge me, lame. i'll do it i already have the proof and the quotes from an administrator himself saying what is not considered a reference, which proves this wikipedia is purely based off the current administrator's opinion and not the regulations of wikipedia. nice one guys. --SLICKFINGERS (talk) 04:08, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

no i get it, but you guys don't get it... i do not want them to be deleted but you have not proven to me what criteria they meet, according to the words of the other admin, they have acquired nothing, and the page i was working on was fully functional with perfect links and references. i need to know why there page is notable and the one i was making not. --SLICKFINGERS (talk) 04:17, 27 January 2008 (UTC)


 * My reply.

So, if i submit a page that is notable and meets the criteria with verifiable links... there is no way you can go with your opinion on it and have it removed since it will follow the rules and as long as the references are not from blogs or myspace... or does myspace prove to be valid since 4 references on the luchagors page are from myspace blogs? --SLICKFINGERS (talk) 04:34, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

i understand what you are saying but i still have to go back on point to say that according to what bands need to pass eligibility on wikipedia the luchagors have not one of them at all so i still don't know why their page exists when the page i put up will be exactly the same and more with better references, i tried putting mine up but it wouldn't be allowed for whatever reason. --SLICKFINGERS (talk) 04:46, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

haha that is too funny, my references were myspace because i didn't exactly know how to do the wiki pages before but i can source every piece of word on the page, if i do that it should be notable. but... the fact that someone in her band is known is irrelevant because according to the other admin he said that the person in our band christy hemme is very well known for everything she does but the fact that she has not been noted as a singer means our page is not notable but how will she ever get noticed as a singer if we can not write about her? her page now mentions the fact that she is in a band... i was the one who figured, what the hell now they mentioned the band i might as well write everything about it since it has been mentioned, but you are wrong if the singer of that other bands gives them notability because she notable as a wrestler just like our singer. so what else can you tell me? --SLICKFINGERS (talk) 04:58, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

ok mr. professional, aren't you supposed to help me? i understand that you can not prove they are notable because no one can because they are not according to the rules i have read 3 times... i just want to understand what asserts to be notable means... like they could be telling the truth or what? come on just be straight with me. it really does just seem like your opinion and not rules, because according to the rules i would have deleted them as an administrator for not following ONE guideline. --SLICKFINGERS (talk) 05:09, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: January 2008
Sorry, my bad. I saw the arv button, as I use Twinkle and I thought that was for reporting a user who continued vandalizing articles. But, I'll keep your comments in mind. However, I have a question; if the user continues to vandalize articles, as he did to the previous articles that I had to revert his edits, does that qualify him for a block? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 04:14, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.
 * Absolutely. Thanks for the reply. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 01:00, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Just to clear things up
SLICKFINGERS and I never even discussed the article in question. He's trying to twist my words to make it seem like I said that page should be deleted (I'm not saying it should or shouldn't, I've barely looked at it. By the way, congrats on your RfA! :) faithless   (speak)  04:59, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

liar... i quoted fathless saying that pages using references such as myspace and blogs are not notable... i never said he said the luchagors pages should not exist.

PROOF:

"To be honest, you're probably fighting a losing battle here. If you can provide links from reliable sources (I'm talking Rolling Stone, Spin, newspapers, Pitchfork, MTV, etc. and not Myspace, blogs, etc.), then show them to me. I'll be happy to look over them and let you know if we can make an article." - (speak) --SLICKFINGERS (talk) 05:06, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * It seems to me that regardless of your self proclaimed 'net prowess you are singularly unable to comprehend the difference between notable and reliable. Likewise you seem to be proficient at pissing off two admins simultaneously whilst managing to not understand a simple list of criteria. Add to that that in spite of your alleged web prowess you are unable to follow simple links given to you that explain every single question you have so far asked. I'm just amazed that you aren't the band's drummer with that sort of resume! -- Web H amster  05:31, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

hey jack sorry about deleting it, i just thought it was in bad taste for the adminstrator:  Web H amster  so say what he did about drummer,s (my brother being one) since it does seem a little unprofessional on his part. --SLICKFINGERS (talk) 06:03, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not an administrator, nor am I a Wikipedia professional. I don't get paid for doing this, neither do the very patient admins you've been pissing off all evening. Meanwhile as part of your obviously lacking musical experience perhaps you should go to here to see the time-honoured muso's (tongue-in-cheek) view of drummers. -- Web H amster  06:14, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

speedy criteria
You declined my nom of speedy for Nondance Records. I make mistakes but I try to learn from them so that I won't make the same mistake next time. So could you please tell me what you saw to "indicate why its subject is important or significant." I'd like to know what I overlooked. Sbowers3 (talk) 04:18, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.
 * Thanks for the explanation. I've now looked at the one band that was apparently notable. It isn't notable so I have nom'd it for speedy. Then I'll renominate Nondance for speedy. Sbowers3 (talk) 14:10, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

RfA thanks
I'm sorry you felt I am inexperienced to become an admin. I hope that by performing more edits on Wikipedia in the next few months that I could possibly change your mind by my next RfA, possibly around May 2008.  - Jameson L. Tai  talk ♦ contribs  04:52, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

WebHamster retired
well i'm really glad to see that, i thought i was the only one he treated poorly. i hope you know i was never trying to be an ass on here, i just wanted to be assured of everything that i did, and thank you for your help. i hope i can get these pages right, i'm collecting many sources as we speak. --SLICKFINGERS (talk) 07:06, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Rfa Thank You
Thanks for your message, and your support. I'm not the sort of guy to go round spamming with pretty pics, although I have blocked 873 vandals already (not really). Cheers, -- Rodhullandemu  (Talk) 15:31, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Mikhaela Reid
Mikhaela's article was already attempted to be deleted. It was declined. See below

01:50, 28 January 2008 W.marsh (Talk | contribs) (1,172 bytes) (decline speedy deletion; contains claims of importance (published by notable papers and magazines)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cartoon-Fan (talk • contribs) 16:55, 28 Jan 2008
 * My reply.

Deletion of Main//Pyrus DMS
I'm sorry that i commited an article that seemed to you as blatant advertising. I ensure you, this is an open-source project and there is no company behind me that makes me publish that article. I saw the article on a very similar software (alfreso) and felt that i wanted to create an article on Main//Pyrus DMS.

I would like to change the article to give it some more content. As i oriented myself in the creation of the page on the content of the alfresco page i think i'm going to get it better done. I was also thinking in editing the page frequently to get more content over time.

So please give me a chance to edit the page for a better version of the article.

Jkokemueller (talk) 21:50, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Airman's Cave Reinstatement Request

 * Ok, So I started this whole quest to have Airmen's Cave created as a wikipedia article the wrong way. I am leaving this message on all 3 admins who graciously pointed out my previous errors in my origional 3 creations and I would like to state my case to have this article re-instated.


 * 1st regarding the blatant copyrite infringement. I have rewritten the article in complete to remove the copyrite problems, and even the paraphrasing I attempted in my second attempt at the article.  All of the text in the current version of the article is my own, with facts pulled from relevant sources.


 * 2nd My article was deleted based on CSD which to my understanding is a policy there to prevent trivial articles. I would like to cite the following 2 sources to both prove via what I think qualify as credible sources that my article is both not trivial and that the information contained within is citable.


 * - is a news story from dailytexanonline about 3 students who were lost in Airmen's cave and rescued by the local firefighters. This story was carried by multiple other news sources (CNN CBS


 * My second source to cite information about the cave is from [The World Caves Database http://www-sop.inria.fr/agos-sophia/sis/DB/database.html]. If you scroll down to the United States on [this list http://www-sop.inria.fr/agos-sophia/sis/DB/countries.html] from their site you will see Airmen's Cave listed, with information including it's total length.


 * 3rd My original retype of the article included information from the personal web site of Michael Wescott Loder who is accepted as one of the caves original explorers and did significant work mapping the cave. This information sadly, is not citable yet since I have not been able to find credible coverage to back up the information presented on his web site.  The current write up of the Airmen's Cave article I would like to implement will not include information from this source until I find a credible and scholarly way to cite it as accurate.  I would like to link 2 sites here, which are people's personal sites that though not citable, do backup in greater detail much of the information I've put forth here.  I believe these to might qualify for being added as external links to allow readers to navigate to the pages and read and decide for themselves.


 * [Michael Wescott Loder's personal page regarding the cave http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/m/w/mwl2/Airmen's_Cave.html]
 * [Enthusiast's page with a collection of information about Airmen's Cave http://www.io.com/~iareth/airmens.html]
 * Lacitpo (talk) 04:05, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

AIV report of 70.91.61.157.
Ya, sorry about that. I noticed the date a few seconds after I posted the report. I looked at it too quickly and thought it was today. I was about to take the request off AIV, but you had already responded. Will look more closely next time. Lazulilasher (talk) 15:03, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

AIV report
I saw that, no worries, just EVERY edit the user had so far was to promote his/her website. Wildthing61476 (talk) 15:16, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Endicott Studio
Earlier today, you deleted an article regarding the Endicott Studio. The article had been rather peculiarly edited and left in a condition which as it stood made it inappropriate for Wikipedia. The Endicott Studio is a group including several very prominent & very notable & often-major-award winning fantasy writers, and I strongly suspect someone with a grudge damaged it and then promoted its deletion. What looks like the original & valid article is still in Google's cache here, is there any easy way to bring it back? The Enchantress Of Florence (talk) 01:34, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.
 * Addition to my previous reply.
 * Another addition.

company categories for deleteion
Thought this might interest you.--Dr who1975 (talk) 02:28, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 03:44, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

your deletion of Jerzy Janowicz
Hi there. 08:32, 31 January 2008 Jauerback (Talk | contribs) deleted "Jerzy Janowicz" ‎ (CSD A7 (Bio): Biographical article that does not assert significance) Unfortunately, I can't tell from this, how hopeless the English version was. As one of the authors of the Polish Wikipedia version (pl:Jerzy Janowicz), I might be able to rescue this, if you show me the deleted text. Take a look at the infobox and result tables in the Polish article - even in Polish, you should be able to glean whether this young tennis player is notable enough for inclusion at this time on the English Wikipedia. He is, after all a finalist of US Open 2007 (tennis, juniors). I think I could make his biography sound enough. Best, --Mareklug talk 15:01, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

deletion of madison+main
Hello. I was notified that you deleted my page because it was "blatant advertising." I'm quite astonished that my page was actually, in fact, deleted (and not just marked for deletion), as I was still editing the page. I had used the "in use" tag at the top of my page and even when my page was marked for deletion it still said that it was also still being edited. Why was my page deleted? I fully understand the rules of "speedy deletion" but find it ridiculous that I wasn't given a chance to eliminate the "blatant advertising" from my page before it was deleted. Please, if you can, un-delete my page so that I may make it a credible encyclopedia entry.

Thank you. --Defstef (talk) 17:33, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

deletion of madison+main pt. 2
Thank you for your note and your explanation. I would very much like it if you would post the text onto a subpage for me. And I will be sure to compare my text with the text of the entries for other advertising agencies and to check out the community portal for assistance in creating a page with notability. Thank you again. --Defstef (talk) 19:43, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

RfA thanks from Happy-melon
I just wanted to say thanks for your support for my RfA, which closed (74/2/0) this morning. Your comment and support was very much appreciated. Happy‑melon 15:49, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Let's make peace
Here you go. I'm using my regular IP at home. ORYZ is the vandal. NOT me. He's posting fake birthdates with no source. He posts fake birthdates for video game characters for God's sake. Even someone reverted his fake Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas edits. I'm simply reverting them also. Ban me if you want but PLEASE don't revert my edits. There is NO source. Ban him. I'm NOT a vandal. Why you fail to see that ORYZ is the vandal I'll never know. You don't see me blanking other topic pages and posting fake birthdates and "bla bla bla" crap.

Look, here are ORYZ's fake edits.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Carl_%22CJ%22_Johnson&diff=prev&oldid=179892383

And here are the reverts.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_characters_in_Grand_Theft_Auto:_San_Andreas&diff=next&oldid=179895590

Here's Squishy Vic confirming he is a vandal.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:OrYzZ&diff=172441941&oldid=169917688

I'm sorry for insulting you that one time. :( I was wrong. :( Again ban me if you want but PLEASE tell ORYZ to stop with the fake birthdates crap.

Thank you. :D

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.94.124.36 (talk) 14:32, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

courtesy call
Re MER MEC S.p.A: Although I agree with the deletion in principle, there may be some claim to an "assertion of notability" in the part about their innovations. The original author tried to put up a hangon tag as well. Although I doubt the article's notability, I'd like to restore it and send it to AfD instead, since the author seems to think it has a legitimate claim. - Revolving Bugbear  18:12, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Bollee
Hi! My name is Manish Modi and I had just created an article on Prof Willem Bollee, a leading Indologist and scholar of Sanskrit, Pali and Prakrit. There was absolutely no form of advertising, he is a notable scholar with a host of acadedemic achievements. So pray, why did you delete it? Manish Modi 04:24, 2 February 2008 (UTC)


 * My reply.

Hi! You are deleting the article without even telling me why! Please do justify to me why you consider an article on a scholar to be blatant advertising. Manish Modi 04:35, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

I see. Could you please do me a favour and send me back th original article by email? (I did not save it anywhere, and I had spent over an hour poring over it.) I shall take a printout and work on it right away. I can email it back to you or put it up on Wiki, and hopefully the result will be far better.

My email id is  Thank you. Manish Modi 04:43, 2 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi! Please do not go with my timings. I am new and pretty confused with Wiki. When I saw that the article had been deleted, I was nonplussed. I was trying to find out what happened. Took me a while to fig. out.


 * But please do email me the article as I had last saved it, just before the speedy deletion. I will not put it up like this, but at least I have the skeleton to work with!


 * Thank you
 * Manish Modi 04:48, 2 February 2008 (UTC)


 * My reply.

Hi! Thanks a lot! I shall definitely work on it and make it more amenable to the teleology of Wiki. Thank you very much for saving what I had written, because it would have been a pain to retype everything!

Is there someplace where I could email the article to you (and others) after redoing it in accordance with Wiki standards? I would much rather write it, have it checked by someone like you and then have it posted to Wiki. The idea is to build awareness of the notable contributions made to Indological studies by scholars.

best wishes, Manish Modi 05:00, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Thanks. Bye Manish Modi 05:15, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Cyrus Belt
Thank you so much for doing that. What is your opinion on the page right now as it stands? Do you think he's not notable enough? I guess I should really find sources for his notability. — Cuyler  91093  -  Соитяівцтіоиѕ  07:42, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

WikiProject Films January 2008 Newsletter
The January 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have any suggestions for improvement or desire other topics to be covered, please leave a message on the talk page of one of the editors.Thank you. Nehrams2020 (talk) 01:33, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

My sandbox
Regarding to User:AL2TB/Sandbox, did I tag the page for speedy deletion? That must have been the wrong page. Is it possible to restore it please? I'm working on something. ^_^ AL2TB ^_^ 18:33, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

User talk:PopzTartz
Care to explain why this block was shortened to 31 hours, minutes after the original block without even informing the original blocking admin? Vandals are not enitled to a full set of warnings and it appears all of his edits are anti-Scientology vandalism and an attack on another user. I really fail to see how AGF applies here. Mr.  Z- man  19:53, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Signpost updated for February 4th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:06, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank You!!!
I appreciate the welcome message immensly. The Little Corporal (talk) 16:06, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Extension of block
Do you think that this IP you recently blocked, should get a longer block? It's been blocked numerous times before, per schoolblocks etc. and the edits seem to reflect the characteristics of a returning vandal. Regards, Rudget . 16:40, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.
 * 'tis good for now. Thanks for taking it into consideration. Regards, Rudget . 16:53, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Transference of article from subpage to main page
Hello again. You recently removed my Madison+Main page and put it into my sandbox so that I could edit it. I was wondering if you might have a second look at the article now that it's been edited and, if its ready, assist me in moving it to the main portal of wikipedia. Thanks for your help thus far. --Defstef (talk) 17:28, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Beyt Tikkun keep?
Curious to know what the rationale for keeping the article when it clearly failed every test? Several admins chimed in and all stated as such. Bstone (talk) 19:05, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.
 * My addition to my first reply.
 * I thought an AfD was not based on opinion but rather based on policy? The article fails every test of policy. I even asked on AfD about mob keep and was assured that the closure would be based on policy and not majority vote. Bstone (talk) 20:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.
 * Huh? Your reply on my talk page is highly confusing. I may have been mistaken about the number of admins, but mob keep is what it seems happened. The article has failed the notability test, in my opinion, so I am curious how you decided to keep the article? Bstone (talk) 20:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Spam in The Servant (book)?!...
Hello, Jauerback,

Why The Servant (book) has been deleted (so refused as... spam[?!]), while, The Little Prince (correctly, Le Petit Prince...) remains as valid article at this Wikipedia?

Note that the purpose of "The Sevant (book)" — under strict encyclopedic viewpoint — is exactly the same: to present, at this encyclopedic corpus, one more valid article about a literary work. Ex positis, why, in fact, has been deleted the referred article?

EgídioCampos Diz! 00:03, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Notability...
...is a so relative matter! Despite of all — and first of all — I wish to thank you for your short but complete deference about this question. However, I must point out that — as you have said — "(...) there was absolutely no assertion of notability in the book, so in it's form, it's only purpose could be interpreted as advertising or spam (...)" [sic, bold and italic forms are mine]. So... as the writing's purpose could be interpreted as (...) , it seems that a second or third different oppinion may be pointed, do not you think?

By according, by not, I thank you once more. The unique purpose of mine is (not was...) to provide a new useful article at this Wiki.

Best salutations! EgídioCampos Diz! 11:12, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for February 11th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:41, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Deletion Review for Beyt Tikkun
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Beyt Tikkun. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Bstone (talk) 19:34, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

merger?
Please state YOUR reasons for wanting to merge that page to the talk page, so that some discussion can begin, otherwise I will remove your tag since you just added it without saying anything. Dr. Cash (talk) 17:14, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.
 * Addition to my first reply.

TracyLinkEdnaVelmaPenny Sockpuppet
I'm curious how you were able to determine with certainty that User:TracyLinkEdnaVelmaPenny is a sockpuppet. I reviewed the contributions and see some similarities (sheer volume, film related, and Yearinfilm dating), but what else would make it conclusive? It would explain the user's ignoring of all messages, however. Jim Dunning | talk  14:52, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Jim Dunning | talk  15:58, 17 February 2008 (UTC) Jim Dunning | talk  16:14, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Cool. I never suspected sockpuppet. Thanks: I'll have another thing to look for in the future.
 * My reply.
 * I felt the same way about the industry, but the refusal to discuss/change and the time involved with corrections was way too annoying. (Too bad about having to wait till next January.)

Good catch on User:TheStuffWillDriveYouNuts. I stumbled on it based on her IMDb account, but found you were ahead of me. It'll be interesting to see if she runs out of usernames. Jim Dunning | talk  05:18, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Dionaea Page
Hi, Just wondering why you removed http://flytrapgrowing.info from the list of external links on the Dionaea page? Did you perhaps make an error? Or do you really consider that to be spam? Womblina (talk) 11:16, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Ah, my bad. I assumed that was you. But what exactly makes the site look spammy? I am confused.Womblina (talk) 04:02, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

OhanaUnited's RFA
  .: Thank you! :.

Status of a DJ
So what would have to be on a radio DJ's page to have a spot on Wikipedia??????? I see there are many pornstars on here........  they contribute WAY less to the society and their pages did not get deleted...  KornCris, as well as other notable DJ's like MetalMish, deserve Wikipedia Pages....   Why did you delet KornCris? —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheGreaterGood (talk • contribs) 01:36, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Username hardblocks
Hi Jauerback. Usernames which are not created with an obvious and deliberate intention to vandalise should be softblocked, that is account creation enabled and autoblock disabled. Not like and. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 15:06, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.
 * No problem, it always takes a few weeks to get the hang of. -- zzuuzz (talk) 15:32, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Home Depot Category
Hey there, based on this discussion that I initiated back in January, I have created Category:Home Depot People. I can’t believe that your discussion of a rename turned into a delete discussion. There are some serious anti category people colluding at the categories for discussion page... you would've been better off renaming it yourself. Anyway, I hope this helps.--Dr who1975 (talk) 16:23, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.
 * Question, are you much of a knowledge expert on Home Depot's history and people... I could use somebody to peer review some of the articles I'm creating that relate to Home Depot people. Maybe add some information and sources that I didn;t find.--Dr who1975 (talk) 16:50, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

You should remove the protection on the talk page for user Douglasfgrego
Hey buddy, it's Doug Grego. I put in an unblock request this morning, and about an hour later you denied the request, but that's not all. You felt compelled to protect the talk page as well, and you cited as grounds abuse of the unblock template. What you didn't include was an explanation of exactly how making three unblock requests on the original day of the block, and then another one 5 days later constitutes abuse of the unblock template, and grounds locking a user's discussion page.

That is totally out of line, is an abuse of administrator power, and quite frank, is a Richard move.

So, I think you should go back in there, and first either unblock the account, or cite legitimate grounds for denying the unblock request, then, either remove the page protection or cite legitimate grounds for imposing a page protection. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 57.69.22.246 (talk) 15:25, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Knowledge Management
Just to say a big thank you for all the work you put in on the Knowledge Management article. Great job and its always a pleasure to see your interventions. --Snowded (talk) 23:52, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Signpost updated for February 18th and 25th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:32, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films February 2008 Newsletter
The February 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:39, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Mkernatmkerndotcom
What policy does this break? Emails as usernames aren't disallowed. --Stephen 02:51, 3 March 2008 (UTC)


 * My reply.
 * It's an email address which, like every email address, has a domain name. That domain name is his personal website, for him as an individual.  He was not promoting anything, he was just adding content in his sphere of expertise.  Have a look at WP:USERNAME, we block promotional usernames that are used to promote a group or company.  --Stephen 21:03, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.
 * You have mail on this issue. EdJohnston (talk) 23:06, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 3rd, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:52, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Czerka Corp.
Actually, it's a fictional company from Star Wars universe, so I doubt that this username promotes anything. Max S em(Han shot first!) 12:50, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

National Bank of Greece
Thanks for the Protect. Things were getting ridiculous. Acad Ronin (talk) 02:18, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Zero gravity (disambiguation)
Um, you didn't protect it? For some reason, I can still edit the page. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 03:30, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

article lock Anti-Americanism
Hi, you locked that article, but would you willing to explain to me, a newcomer, why, and why for so long, since I have not yet had an answer to his at: Talk:Anti-Americanism. That would be great! &#151; Xiutwel ♫☺♥♪ (speech has the power to bind the absolute) 14:57, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Anti-Americanism
 * My reply.

page status
Thank for your attention to Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The edfit protection was completely warranted and justified, and much-needed, in my opinion. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 15:10, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Thank you!
Nothing worse than a hotheaded teenager (based on his earlier edits) who thinks he owns the place. Thanks for blocking that Luigi128 character. Much obliged. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 16:01, 10 March 2008 (UTC)



PMDrive1061 (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

AFD Comments
Hello. I saw that back in December you questioned the notability of the Bulldog Party article. I have nominated it for deletion: Articles for deletion/Bulldog Party. I have also nominated another similar article here: Articles for deletion/Bearcat Voice. Just thought that you might want to know about these AFDs. Cheers!--RedShiftPA (talk) 00:46, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Anti-Americanism
It's started again. User:Theo Pardilla attempted to revert to a copy from before the edit war, but that was reverted too. Getting slightly out of hand, and -- in my opinion, although it is one that's inexperienced with this part of WP -- I think mediation or arbitration may be required. Something, anyway, as it just doesn't seem to be dying down for any reasonable length of time. Regards, AllynJ (talk | contribs) 09:15, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * User:Slakr has now re-protected. Just thought you might like to know, anyway. Out of interest, why did you unprotect it the first time? I wasn't entirely clear on the reasoning, but am interested in seeing it. :) Regards, AllynJ (talk | contribs) 09:35, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.
 * Okay, fair enough; thanks for informing me. :) AllynJ (talk | contribs) 02:53, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

User talk:121.220.221.159
What is going on? :D Rudget . 13:27, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.
 * No problem then. :) Rudget . 13:31, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films coordinator elections
The WikiProject Films coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect five coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by March 28! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 04:35, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Why?
Welcome to Wikipedia,Now,when i left my comment\change for the profile of Patrick Stump why was it deleted?It is a true fact because he indeed did say it.Please Reply,Thank-You. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MustFallOutBoy (talk • contribs) 18:00, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Thanks very much, Jauerback
Thanks very much for the "repeatvandal" tag at User talk:204.69.4.82. Very much obliged. --Art Smart (talk) 15:12, 11 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks also for today's 1-month block on 204.69.4.82. Truly appreciated.  --Art Smart (talk) 14:39, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.
 * Super. If you haven't already, please also keep a watch on User talk:138.23.89.187, as the same vandal has been known to visit the other Riverside college campus to circumvent a block on 204.69.4.82.  I have no idea why the vandal has a problem with Garrison Keillor‎, but he/she also likes to vandalize articles on Keillor's intellectual property, such as Lake Wobegon, A Prairie Home Companion‎, and A Prairie Home Companion (film).  Thanks again for the watchful eye, and especially for your willingness to take appropriate action.  --Art Smart (talk) 14:59, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

SIR CHARGE
Why did you get rid of sir charge. It is a fictional and stupid person after all--but it exists somewhere. I will make sure this page is rewritten.

mark my words —Preceding unsigned comment added by ARTHURLORD (talk • contribs) 01:59, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Steve Dahl photos
Nice job on the Dahl photos! You even got Buzz in there. Nobody of Consequence (talk) 14:18, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

AIV Talk

 * Okay, that's just unfair. Someone always has to beat me to answering questions. Well, I beat a lot of people with vandal partol, so there! :P I've seen you around befire, don't know if you have seen me though :P Steve Crossin (talk) 13:51, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Signpost updated for March 13th and 17th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 23:02, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Yup, they really did
  Oh snap, the DEA is an admin

Disco Demolition Dahl
Sure, that sounds like a good idea. After all, it's one of his most notable events and probably what most folks nationally would remember him for. Nobody of Consequence (talk) 17:28, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Notice of potential block - Redlance
Jauerback, this is about potential block notice on me. I'm sorry to have over stepped my limits.

"Kokarako Gumango" is another sockpuppet of Mudaliar, youonlylivetwice..etc. If you see his/her edits, it's nothing but reverting old edits of banned user (Mudaliar, youonlylivetwice). And I have invited for discussion but this user is only bent upon defiling this page. please see Sengunthar discussion.

IP vandalism is continuing in various forms, I also requested for indefinite page protection on 13th March and as well today. Please help by protecting indefinitely with my "last undo" -- Redlance —Preceding unsigned comment added by Redlance (talk • contribs) 14:43, 22 Mar 2008
 * My reply.
 * Redlance is a sock of Venki123 who was banned by the arbitration committee.. Was also confirmed to be editing only by open proxies. I request you to block this user. Kokarako Gumango (talk) 19:46, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.
 * Ok, I have filed a case as you told:Kokarako Gumango (talk) 06:59, 23 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Jauerback, Thanks, I'm not sockpuppet of anyone and not using proxy IP. I'm using same IP and not using any proxy as KK. Earlier the accusation made by User:youonlylivetwice were found false, subsequently was cleared  and he was banned. My interest is same "protecting the Sengunthar from defiling here in WIKI, so I edit Sengunthar and Mudaliar pages".  Redlance (talk) 07:13, 23 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Look closely at Redlance's initial post to your talk page: here, he says he has been cleared but then instead of giving the link to his talk page, he gives the link to the talk page of his sock Saedirof. Next he also admits to have edited the Mudaliar page, but as of 07:13, 23 March 2008 (the time of this post to your page) Redlance has never edited the Mudaliar article even once. If he is not using socks then how could he have edited Mudaliar page? Well there you go. Block him. Kokarako Gumango (talk) 08:06, 23 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Well, Jauerback, The reference to User:Saedirof is to show that earlier too User:youonlylivetwice branded me and User:Saedirof together and how in the process User:youonlylivetwice got banned. I do have email from user:Thatcher who unblocked the IP address. I said, "edit" Redlance (talk) 11:29, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Please make your arguments at Suspected_sock_puppets/Venki123 and keep it off my talk page. I'm no longer involved in this. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:42, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Dahl GA
I noticed you submitted Steve Dahl for GA review. How good do you think our chances are? Nobody of Consequence (talk) 02:00, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.
 * Cool. And even if it doesn't make it, they'll give us some tips on how to improve it. Nobody of Consequence (talk) 13:47, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Crookes sandbox article
Thanks. I had no idea that that page was still there. I have deleted it because it is no longer needed. — Jeremy (talk) 14:14, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Block notice
I wasn't referring to that block. I copied what the other block said just changed the hours because of vandalism. (Rhinostampede (talk) 00:46, 24 March 2008 (UTC))
 * My reply.

Am i allowed to warn the user?(Rhinostampede (talk) 01:05, 24 March 2008 (UTC))
 * My reply.

AHH I didn't know only admins could do that. My apologies. This won't happen again.(Rhinostampede (talk) 01:12, 24 March 2008 (UTC))

Talk page question
Jauerback, you're an administrator right? So with that can I remove the block templates from my talk page? ESCStudent774441 (talk) 19:53, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Signpost updated for March 24th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:30, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Wally Phillips
I was sad to hear of the passing of The King of Chicago Morning Radio. I think you posted a "references needed" tag. I wonder what references you're looking for? Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 16:20, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.
 * AFK - You speak Africaans? :) I'll try to get back to the article at some point and see what to do. I'm thinking Roy Leonard also needs an article. We'll see about that. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 16:31, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

HoF deletion
Categories_for_discussion/Log/2008_March_27 express your opinion. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 19:18, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Wally article
I cleaned up a bit, added a head and a couple subheads. Nice article. Nobody of Consequence (talk) 13:15, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Sure thing. I noticed someone mentioned Roy Leonard above and that made me think of Family Classics and Frazier Thomas. Frazier really deserves a better article than that, maybe something we could work on in the future? Nobody of Consequence (talk) 14:42, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Is WGN sufficiently notable that we would be safe in creating articles on more of their present and/or past regular personalities? Also, I think it was Bob Collins who called Wally "The King". Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 15:35, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I think as long as we can satisfy WP:N and WP:V we're good to go. All we need are reliable sources to do that (newspaper and/or magazine articles, books, etc.) Nobody of Consequence (talk) 16:11, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Ben Affleck
Yes I was aware my edit to the page on Ben Affleck removed some text. It was clearly an April Fool's prank since it said he died in 1943, it was mildly amusing but not appropriate for an encyclopedia. 193.128.87.36 (talk) 15:14, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.


 * Oops, I just realised my mistake, it was an actual page about someone else with a similar name, my bad. Thanks for tidying up my mistake. My brain clearly isn't on full power today. 193.128.87.36 (talk) 15:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

I'm devastated
You don't care who I am? I'm crushed. I'm hurt. I'm in tears. :) I actually don't care about his WP:3RR violations, I care about his racist edits.  They're disgusting.  Orange Marlin  Talk• Contributions 20:45, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films March 2008 Newsletter
The March 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:22, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 31st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 21:12, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Gayelle
Hi! You speedily deleted Gayelle (lesbian) but neglected to close the ongoing AfD at Articles for deletion/Gayelle (lesbian). I've closed that. Just an FYI =D -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 01:42, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Jo Wiltshire
With all due respect, I can easily create an article on myself and establish suitable notability for inclusion; I feel that's exactly what this person has done. Only other edit was a nearly contentless nanostub on a book she wrote and published via a vanity press outlet. If you feel it's sutable for AfD, I'd like to request that you propose it as such if you wouldn't mind. It's been a long time since I've nominated an article and I'm unfamiliar with the new procedure. Thanks. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 21:46, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Many thanks. Just want to do the right thing, here. PMDrive1061 (talk) 21:58, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Unblocking
I'll unblock assuming good faith and I'll keep an eye on him/her. I need to go really soon though and I won't be around again until about midnight UTC, so don't hesitate to reblock if it is just a spammer. Thanks for the note. James086 Talk &#124; Email 13:57, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.


 * Thanks, I've unblocked and now I must depart. Have a good one, James086 Talk &#124;  Email 14:03, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Outing Riley
Just a quick note to say I deleted your prod at Outing Riley and added WP:RS citations. :-) Seems like Steve really was in that film too, at least according to IMDB. Nobody of Consequence (talk) 05:05, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.
 * Responded on my talk. Nobody of Consequence (talk) 15:24, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

reqphoto
Greg, I ran across your categorization by counties in California for reqphoto and this template. First of all, I think it's a great idea, and I'm slowly working on making Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Illinois the same. However, wouldn't it be easier/possible to make the template a general template for use on all states, rather than just California? Jauerbackdude?/dude. 14:26, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I was toying with that idea. However, both the phrase "California counties" and the link to the Table of California counties do not repeat for each state. Also, my thinking was that each state WikiProject might want to revise their own "instructions for requested photographs in (state)" template. With Georgia WikiProject, we successfully modified their talk page template so that they no longer need reqphoto. I would be happy to do that for Illinois. GregManninLB (talk) 14:37, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

For you!...

 * My reply.
 * currently reviewing Steve Dahl. i will definitely suggest some points in order to improve Weber-Stephen Products Co.. cheers, Sushant gupta (talk) 18:15, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Dahl GA stuff
I added references in the places requested, what's left is to expand the lead and the music career section (or merge music into the lead somehow). Update: I went ahead and merged music into the introduction as the reviewer suggested. When you get a chance, have a look and let me know what you think. Nobody of Consequence (talk) 20:22, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.
 * Addition to my reply.


 * my pleasure. Keep it up. Sushant gupta (talk) 03:48, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Page Deletion Query
You recently deleted a userpage, claiming the page was full of advertising. I always thought that the user pages were designed for a little bit of knowledge about yourself. After browsing other user pages, which had the same written based content as my deleted page did, I ask you...why did you delete my page when there are plenty of other pages containing much worse content and are still up?

(PS. the page you deleted on the 9th April was called user:UniverSearleStudios —Preceding unsigned comment added by DJS92 (talk • contribs) 14:41, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Signpost updated for April 7th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:17, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Template:HowtoreqphotoinUS
Hi Jauerback. I took your suggestion and made a general request photo template for use on all states, rather than just California. The template is at Template:HowtoreqphotoinUS. Examples of its use are at Boone County and Los Angeles. Since you are an admin, I could use your help to edit Template:WikiProject Illinois to add image location requests as I did for Template:WikiProject California and some other state WikiProjects. I'll contact you when I have the code ready for Template:WikiProject Illinois. Thanks. GregManninLB (talk) 21:13, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.
 * I modified the template to include the categories. See Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Boise County, Idaho as an example implementation of the change. The category change also worked for Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Boone County, Illinois. (We probably shouldn't overwhelm state Wikiprojects categories by categorize each county category in a state Wikiproject. I removed the WikiProject Illinois from the Boone County, Illinois category. GregManninLB (talk) 15:35, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Illinois photo requests
I noticed you have been putiing photo requests on many Illinois town talk pages, including some already with photos. Is there any reason you put photo requests on articles with photos? Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 14:44, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

RFPP
Can you please take another look at this? Unfortunately, the requestor was unclear in describing the situation and neglected to encompass the disruptive edits. Links to the just-expired 4 day RFPP, as well as diffs as needed, are available should you need them. THanks so much! /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 21:51, 14 April 2008 (UTC)


 * You now have two well-respected editors and an administrator requesting review of the circumstances. I can totally agree with your initial declination based on pre-emption, however I think there is ample evidence that this isn't the case.  Thanks again!  /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 22:30, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Thanks again for taking the time to respond. I hope you don't take offense to this request, which I feel is appropriate give the recent developments and the expressed intent to continue disruptive behavior. At any rate, thanks for notifying me. /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 03:44, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Edit War Warning
You recently warned me for edit warring because I edited the lead of the Fox News entry twice in one day. I am curious, did you also warn the person who reverted my edits twice? (TheNobleSith). If not, then why? Thank you. Jsn9333 (talk) 03:51, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.
 * If I made 4 edits of the lead, then 2 of them were minor punctuation or mistakes of that sort. Do you take that into account? I am not attempting to "complain", but rather am seeking to understand this process better. I'm fairly new here.  Thank you. Jsn9333 (talk) 04:06, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Connexus
You deleted a page created and said it was blatant advertising. I put a short hist of a company and was going to add a time line form 1935. Could you please explain to me how this is blatant advertising? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trackwi (talk • contribs) 13:50, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Signpost updated for April 14th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:27, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: CSD C1
Hello. WP:CSD and WP:CSD are separate criterion. That is, some categories can fall under one, the other, both, or neither. C1 requires that a category must be empty for four days before being deleted. C3 deals with categories that have been emptied from a no-longer-used template. Basically, if you're going to create category pages, it's best to find at least one item to go into them. Or, if you can't, put a note at the top explaining that the category may be empty for a while.

On an unrelated note, using categories for this particular task seems awfully silly and probably should be avoided entirely. But that's neither here nor there. Cheers. --MZMcBride (talk) 19:53, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Fabyan wimdmill stamp image
I've left you a message about this on your Commons talk page. Mjroots (talk) 08:18, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Le Rollback
Thanks for the nice tool! I tested it out on the sandbox and it works like a charm. Nobody of Consequence (talk) 02:14, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks from me as well - I look forward to using it! --Snowded (talk) 05:16, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

RE: Stop Editing Yuma, Arizona
Apologies If I'm doing this wrong, I'm still getting the hang of the whole user talk thing. Below I've attached the link to my temporary talk page. I have yet to make an account. Anyway, thanks for the heads-up about Rhinostampede I realized he was blocked after I made my reply. Any idea on why Wikipedia took a month to notify me of the message? I've had the same IP since then.

--76.178.68.196 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.178.68.196 (talk • contribs) 22:13, 28 Apr 2008

Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:54, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

reqphoto
Hi Jauerback. One of my goals is to phase out the use of reqphoto on U.S. state articles. This will help reduce banner clutter on these pages. If you look at the bottom of Template:WikiProject_Illinois, you will see the recommended base string. This should be posted on the talk pages of the articles listed at Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Illinois and the reqphoto banner then should be removed. For example, in stead of Talk:Caledonia, Illinois having the two banners and , the single string would convey the same information and banner clutter would be reduced. I'll take a look at WikiProject Photography. Thanks. GregManninLB (talk) 13:50, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.
 * Since WikiProject Illinois is a parent project of WikiProject Chicago, WikiProject Illinois's banner should display and categorize the photo request and WikiProject Chicago template should be changed to only categorize the photo request as needed by WikiProject Chicago. For now, I don't see any problem with using both templates to the fullest. GregManninLB (talk) 14:18, 18 April 2008 (UTC
 * My reply.
 * The county sorts do not have all Illinois articles in one category. Category:Illinois articles needing images is how the WikiProject keeps track of all articles within its scope that need images. I explained it here. GregManninLB (talk) 14:28, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.
 * My reply.
 * Hi Jauerback. I haven't given up on the U.S. request photo scheme. At the moment, I'm looking into categories, how WikiProjects use categories, and how the code works for the WikiProject templates. Once I get a better handle on all that, I'll continue implementing the U.S. request photo scheme. GregManninLB (talk) 14:01, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Very Hard Choices
While I don't agree with the policy, it specifically backs up your suggestion that it be deleted, and I'm a grown up. (most days, at least) I'll wait until the book is out to add the article. CatherS (talk) 10:59, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Stephania Bell Deletion
I don't know where to post a discussion on a deleted entry, so I'm going to try here. You deleted the Stephania_Bell page. Before you said she wasn't important. But there's been a material change to highlight her prominence and it was added to the entry (a new reference). How do I re-open the discussion to not delete the entry based on new facts/references that have emerged? thanks. FantasyHistory (talk) 12:52, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Dahl
Nice job of bulking up the Steve Dahl article. I'm still not sure where that big quote should go. Very busy at work lately, so not much time for Wiki. :-( Nobody of Consequence (talk) 22:44, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Conclusion: Image placeholders centralized discussion
Hi. I'm sending this to you because you participated in the Centralized discussion on image placeholders that ended on 23 April.

That discussion must produce a conclusion.

We originally asked  "Should the addition of this box [example right] ''be allowed? Does the placeholder system and graphic image need to be improved to satisfy policies and guidelines for inclusion? Is it appropriate to some kinds of biographies, but not to others?" '' (See introduction).

Conclusions to centralized discussions are either marked as 'policy', 'guideline', 'endorsed', 'rejected', 'no consensus', or 'no change' etc. We should now decide for this discussion.

Please read and approve or disapprove the section here: Conclusion --Kleinzach (talk) 11:28, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Please note this message conforms to WP:CANVASSING and has not been sent to anyone has not already participated in the centralized discussion.

WikiProject Films April 2008 Newsletter
The April 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:08, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Hey, remember me
It's been too long. I'm glad to see you finally stopped acting like a jackass to me. I have been vindicated. You were wrong to ban me until March of this year. ORYZ was the vandal and it was proven to be so. My Godfather edits were correct and I'm glad to see that he gave up his vandalism. I have been exonerated. He is the vandal. I am not.

Feel free to reply to this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.32.231.244 (talk) 13:19, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Re:Thanks
Hey, no problem. btw, your sig is pretty cool... B-) Thingg &#8853; &#8855;  18:28, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

New Project
Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.

If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 04:52, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

False Information Posted on the Monica Lin Brown Article
In reference to your revision http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Monica_Lin_Brown&diff=210429225&oldid=210416307 by where you reinstated false information, the source which this information is cited is from the Washington Post http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/30/AR2008043003415.html If you read the article, there is no where which it states she was pulled back because she is a female. There is no official military response or reasoning to why she was removed from the fight because of the reason of being a female. Please read the article, I do not wish the post the entire article verbatim on your page but to prove my point I will. Please do not revert the falsified information without looking at the source, thank you. -Signaleer (talk) 21:47, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

WikiProject Graphics - New!
Inspired by your request to discuss and the actual discussion, I created WikiProject Graphics in hopes of finally getting a handle on all this. If you would be so kind, please consider listing your name on the project (so they don't delete it as having only one member). Thanks! GregManninLB (talk) 22:47, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 2nd and 9th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:58, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Please restore The Einstein Academy as a contested WP:Prod
 Jerry  talk ¤ count/logs 04:12, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.


 * Hi. I see I made an error... I will ask the deleting admin to restore it. I do not know if it is notable or not, but I think most high schools get improved at AfD, and can normally be shown to be notable.  I think AFD is a better way to handle this particular article than prod.  Thanks for the reply.  Jerry   talk ¤ count/logs 03:06, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

WBOSITG's RfA
 Hello Jauerback, I'd like to take this opportunity to thank you for your participation in my RfA which was passed with a final tally of 114/10/4. I'm both shocked and honoured to gain so much support from users whom I admire and trust, and I hope I can avoid breaking that backing by being the best administrator I possibly can. I will take on board the opposition's comments and I hope to improve over the coming months and years. Once again, thank you!  weburiedoursecrets inthegarden  20:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 12th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:04, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

WP:HAU
Hello again. The Highly Active Users project has gone through a complete revamping per popular demand. We believe this new format will make it easier for new editors to find assistance. However, with the new format, I must again ask you to verify your information on this page. I attempted to translate the data from the old version to the new, but with the extensive changes, I may have made some errors. Thanks again. Useight (talk) 03:58, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Dahl FA
I'll start cleaning up/consistently formatting the references over the next few days. How do you feel about submitting this for FA? Nobody of Consequence (talk) 16:45, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.
 * Responded on my talk. Nobody of Consequence (talk) 04:55, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

"nonfree images do not go into WP:BLP infoboxes"
please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Wayne for a contradiction to this policy Hueydoc (talk) 22:30, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

reply
i had assumed that the term "living" meant a person that existed in real life and was not a created character. so i guess when Harry Morgan dies that pic can be used. Hueydoc (talk) 23:09, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Steve Dahl peer review
I've listed Steve Dahl at Peer Review to get feedback on how we can improve it to FA status. If you'd like, head over to Talk:Steve Dahl and click the link at the top. Hopefully, eventually, we'll get some good feedback. The actual FA process is fairly heavy and will probably give us yet more work to do, but I think we're close with this article. Nobody of Consequence (talk) 07:43, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Terminator 2: Judgment Day
In Terminator 2: Judgment Day there is the first chase scene where T-1000 with a truck chasing John Connor. John Connor is trying to escape with a motorcycle. Eventually Terminator (Arnold Schwarzenegger) saved John from T-1000. In this chasing phrase, there is a scene where Terminator (Arnold Schwarzenegger) is jumping with his motorcycle (it was a very dangerous jump scene). My question is that whether this jump scene was actually done by Arnold Schwarzenegger himself, or by some stunt man?  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 11:40, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Could you do me a favor?
I'm not sure if they fall under any established speedy-deletion categories, but 209.250.180.247 has been creating talk pages for about a half-dozen images and the only content is a short personal commentary on the image. I'm not sure if they are deletable (I'm familiar with the CSD, but not that familiar...), but imho they take up needless server space, etc. If you think deleting them is ok, I'd appreciate it if you would. Thanks. Thingg &#8853; &#8855; 18:49, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Signpost updated for May 19th and 26th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:51, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films May 2008 Newsletter
The May 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:02, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 2, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:11, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 9, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:04, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Paramount Theatre
Hi JB,

I noticed that you are working on an article of the Paramount. I recently uploaded some additional pics of the theater (although in a greater context of downtown Aurora). If you like any of them, please feel free to use them on the page. Thanks for your work! Cheers-Cbradshaw (talk) 20:00, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.
 * Haha, I stumbled onto it by linking through the image. I wouldn't mind working on the article so it can go "live", if that's alright with you.  What do you say?-Cbradshaw (talk) 21:17, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Forgive Me Leona Lewis
So what happens if it becomes a single with reliable sources in the future it simply get deleted!! (Sexty2 (talk) 17:52, 16 June 2008 (UTC))

So what
 * My reply.

It's too early!
Do you know what building that is in the "Steve Dahl's It's Too Early" image? It looks like a school or maybe an airport terminal (??). Just curious. Nobody of Consequence (talk) 21:07, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Email from LDCortez (info@oceanbridgegroup.com)
To remain transparent about the "Cary Herrman" article, here's an email I received from User: LDCortez: "Hi, I am uncertain as to why you are continuously attempting to delete the page I researched and created for a school project. It meets all criteria and guidelines- I appreciate your persistence, but really, I feel you are attacking my work because someone said that I worked for Cary Herrman??

He has notability: http://oceanbridgegroup.com/news.php

...and is an important leader in orchestrating corporations to assist 3rd world countries: http://oceanbridgegroup.com/causes.php

Please let me know what else I need to provide so that this man's page is held in the integrity that it deserves.

Thank you Jauerback,

Yours, Laura"


 * My reply:


 * I'm uncertain why you insist on removing the headers that have been placed up on the page after numerous warnings to stop. I have never attempted to delete your page until yesterday when I submitted it to AFD, which you promptly removed the header for... again.


 * Just because YOU say he's notable, doesn't make it so. You have done nothing to prove that he is.  It doesn't meet neither the criteria nor guidelines set by Wikipedia and I believe is being merely used as additional form of advertisement so his potential clients can go, "Wow, he must be important, he as a Wikipedia article."


 * Also, I really have a hard time believing any claim that you merely researched this as a school project and have no affiliation with Mr. Herrmann. According to this website:  http://www.linkedin.com/pub/2/370/113, Mr. Herrmann's secretary is Lucy Cortez.  You're telling me that your initials just happen to be L Cortez, but you're just an unbiased, unaffialiated, unaware, student named, Laura Cortez?  Right.  Then, I guess that would also make all your claims of self-made pictures for Mr. Hermann invalid, too, which will probably mean they get deleted.


 * Oh, by the way, next time you try and claim you're a student and not affiliated with Mr. Herrman, you might want to think about changing your email address. "info@oceanbridgegroup.com" just happens to be coming from his company's website.  Still wanna go with that claim?


 * Please stop trying to play innocent.

(actual email available upon request) Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:44, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Unblock suggestion
After I warned LDCortez not to repeat various kinds of edits, and before LDCortez had made any other edit anywhere, you blocked LDCortez.

I urge you to cancel your block, which (for example) prevents LDCortez from making a legitimate defense of the article. (Worse, the fact that -- before my warning, of course -- LDCortez dumped on your user page makes your block look rather personal, even if it wasn't personal.) Hoary (talk) 02:17, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.
 * To which I replied there. (In short; Gotcha.) Meanwhile, you might keep an eye on "JerryBuck". (I think some sprotection may soon be called for.) -- Hoary (talk) 03:40, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

This IP needs a block
This IP is at a Mac display at the Granville, WV Best Buy. The Mac next to this one, 198.22.123.103, has been blocked for 6 months. Best to do the same for this one. 198.22.122.123 (talk) 19:30, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Cary Herrman
Hi Jauerback, I am working to preserve an article you had blocked/ deleted. In reviewing the information and your history with the original creator, it appears you placed a block on the page and I am asking you to remove it. This looks like a personal attack against LDCortez and I would like to focus on the objectivity of the article in and of itself. Mr. Herrman is notable.

Thank you. BHOrchid (talk) 19:49, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Cary Herrman
Thank you for your response Jauerback. Seeing what was going on between you and the creator, I took the liberty of copying the work in the chance you were to have had the article deleted. From what I can see, the article on Cary Herrman is notable and relevant. I will follow your direction, submit this to wikipedia and solicit the help of other objective administrators (not accusing you of being subjective) to have the article reposted and protected. I am uncertain as to the incident between LDCortez and yourself, I feel it an important article for others to share. Thank you. BHOrchid (talk) 20:09, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Hi JB-
No, I will not take your skepticism personally. This has to do with an article that appears you attacked. I am not User:LDCortez, 2. Another employee of Cary Herrman's, or 3. Cary Herrmann, himself. I googled Mr. Herrman, was directed to the wiki article and witnessed what was going on between you and the creator. It appears as if you are/were in a war with the creator and I am against such a display. This is when I chose to copy the original work and to preserve it.

My question to you, as an administrator, and I hope that you do not take this personally, do you know Mr. Herrman, do you have something against the man, his contributions to his field, his contributions to humanity? Did Mr. Herrman say or do anything to you or anyone that you know? I do not know if you know LDCortez- but what is obvious to myself and others is that it is apparent you have something against the original creator and you should have removed yourself from the deletion process to maintain objectivity. What happened is not fair practice within this community- especially from an admin.

Thank you.

BHOrchid (talk) 20:52, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.
 * A follow up question.

Addressing your question
Certainly. In reviewing the history, I was directed to your page. Apparently the original creator of the article was in some way offensive to you. This is when you blocked LDCortez. In blocking LDCortez, the creator of the article was unable to defend the article. This appears to be an attack, by myself and others. There is also a comment from another user, Hoary, asking you to remove the block. BHOrchid (talk) 21:15, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

LDCortez
Sorry, I forgot to add this. Something doesn't add up here and I am trying to be as fair as possible.

-The user's name is LDCortez and you are saying she Emailed you from Mr. Herrman's company? Correct me if I am wrong, but perhaps she placed the Email address as a way to contact someone at Mr. Herrman's company...? I recall being asked for either an email address or my IP when registering. If LDCortez was registering to create the particular article for school as she claims, it is more than likely she used an email from Mr. Herrman's company's website. Perhaps she thought the account was tied to the article. This is why I am thinking this: You are stating that there is a secretary by the name of "Lucy". The creator's name is Laura. Am I missing something? Lastly, you directed me through the link provided to another site that lists Mr. Herrman. You state that the creator is his secretary. I only see a Randi Wilson, not a Lucy, not a Laura, not a LDCortez. Something doesn't add up here and again, this takes away from the work itself.

I hope this and my prior response helps you to see why your block and submission for deletion are an issue.

There is another expert within Mr. Herrman's field, an article on this gentlemen can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donny_Deutsch

I fail to see the difference between the two, except for the fact that Mr. Herrman has made contributions to his field where this gentlemen has not.

Thank you. BHOrchid (talk) 21:31, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Thank you~
If you are saying that LDCortez emailed you from the email she placed instead of from wikipedia, then that makes more sense. Is this the case? Is there a way we can look at IPs to see?

The cached page makes more sense and I see your side of the argument and reasoning. I'm still uncertain as to how we are trying to connect Lucy to Laura but the change to the page is interesting unless it was simple coincidence.

I am still not in agreement with your actions on blocking the creator, as LDCortez was unable to defend her article, but can now understand your reasoning/ where you are coming from.

You appear to be getting defensive and I do not want to get on your bad side as did LDCortez, I am simply trying to understand how an objective article was able to be deleted without the creator having proper position to defend. Basically as I see it, LDCortez was tied-up, bound and gagged while the "trial" for this article occurred. To address your skepticism on how I came across the article, I googled Mr. Herrman after attending a seminar where he spoke on responsibility of business leaders to invest percentages of their business to humanitarian efforts in Africa. If you heard the man speak, you would understand why I defend him and believe he has more notability than most others on here.

I was also impressed that the topics he spoke on were found on his company's website, I respect individuals who walk their talk, so to speak. Yes, I would not only compare Mr. Herrman to a Donny Deutsch- but from what I understand, Mr. Herrman is self-made, a humanitarian and a leader in his field. Donny Deutsch inherited an agency, has had years of PR behind him and who now has a talk show about "nothing"... while Mr. Herrman is working to change the world.

Thank you. BHOrchid (talk) 22:11, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Deletion review for Cary_Herrman
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Cary_Herrman. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. BHOrchid (talk) 22:43, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Request to unprotect
Jauerback, wiki guidelines ask that I place

at the top of the page for the article in review. I went to both Cary Herrman and Cary Herman and you have blocked them both, this prohibits me from following proper wiki protocol. You are either welcome to place the tag on both pages or to kindly remove your block so that the deletion review process can be completed. Thank you. BHOrchid (talk) 22:56, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.
 * Actually, it's only requested for pages that still exist when there's a deletion review on them. For deleted pages, they are supposed to stay deleted.  Cheers.  --<i style="color:green;">lifebaka</i> (Talk - Contribs) 23:27, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Image of Monster shopping cart
Just as an FYI...while that is certainly a "monster" version of a common wheeled object, it is not a monster truck in that it does not have the monster (48" and up) tires nor would it be able to crush cars. It's a cool ride, but it's not a monster truck by definition, and doesn't really belong in the article.Arenacale (talk) 21:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 23 and 26, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:40, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films June 2008 Newsletter
The June 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 23:55, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 30, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 04:40, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

WP:HAU, Status, and you!
As you may know, the StatusBot responsible for maintaining the status of the Highly Active Users was taken offline. We now have a replacement in the Qui status system. This semi-automatic system will allow you to easily update your status page found at Special:Mypage/Status which the HAU page code is now designed to read from. If you are already using Qui (or a compatible) system - great! - no action is needed (other than remembering to update your status as necessary). If not, consider installing Qui. You can also manually update this status by changing the page text to online, offline, or busy. While it is not mandatory, the nature of HAU is that people are often seeking a quick answer from someone who is online and keeping our statuses up-to-date will assist with this. Note if you were previously using your /Status page as something other than a one-word status indicator, your HAU entry may have been set to "status=n" to correct display issues. Please clear this parameter if you change things to be "HAU compatible". Further questions can be raised at WT:HAU. This message was delivered by xenobot  22:46, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 7, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:43, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar!
Although, I have to give some credit to Huggle.... :-) ...  disco spinster   talk  02:09, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Christine Breese
I saw that you closed Articles for deletion/Christine breese as delete. I wonder whether you saw this. --Evb-wiki (talk) 19:03, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Bart Versieck
Thank you for reviewing the request (and having him watchlisted)! If, however, you agree with Ryan Postlewaite that I am too involved, I am still willing (as I offered on his talk page) to reduce the block to three days and recuse myself from ANY future blocks, provided that you keep an eye out along with LHVU and xeno. It may not be entirely inaccurate to say that I am becoming more than a tad frustrated. Cheers, CP 18:51, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Please review deletion of Shmuel Yerushalmi
I just tried to go to this article in order to add information about Yerushalmi's recent arrest, and was surprised to see that it had been deleted earlier today. I have previously edited the article, but was not aware of the deletion discussion. I note that the discussion, which lasted just five days, had only five contributors; the previous deletion discussion, which lasted twelve days, attracted over thirty contributors, and no consensus was reached. I am sure that, if this discussion had been better notified and allowed to run for longer, the result would have been similar. Particularly given the circumstances of his arrest, on the basis of the content of one of his poems, it is to be expected that more readers will be interested to look at the article, which was in any case about a notablr figure.

So I request that you reconsider your decision to delete, and relist the discussion in order to allow greater participation. RolandR (talk) 00:20, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


 * My reply]


 * The request Articles for deletion/Shmuel Yerushalmi (2nd nomination), was open for the full five days, albeit it was only discussed by five users. Jauerback is correct in what he stated here, that WP:DRV is probably the best course of action. P.S. - Yeah, Jauerback, I haven't seen you around in a while, I guess our paths just haven't crossed. Useight (talk) 04:14, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


 * My reply

Public Information Research
I notice that you recently deleted as a result of Articles for deletion/Public Information Research (2nd nomination). While many editors supported the deletion of this article, the comment by Squidfryerchef at the end of the discussion provided new evidence of this organization's notability, namely, that Public Information Research was the subject of an extensive article in Online magazine. Since all editors supporting the deletion of this article did so before this citation was provided, it is highly probable that they did not consider it. Furthermore, I note that no additional comments favoring the deletion of this article were made after this additional evidence of notability was introduced. Therefore, I request that this discussion be reopened and relisted. Thank you. John254 03:09, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Deletion review for Public Information Research
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Public Information Research. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review..

I'll let you know now, this isn't a request for undeletion, but rather for a user draft. I figured it would be a good idea to have a formal discussion even for a draft, given the past PIR/DB situations. -- Ned Scott 04:33, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Closing AfDs the modern way...
Hey there. I've recently come back from a long wikibreak and want to help out in the traditional AfD backlog once more. What's the current hot script for automating the boring parts of it? I'm using the ancient AfD closure script but I suspect there may be some exciting new thing to make it even easier and faster - deary me, Wikipedia is scary these days (I discovered HG this week...). Any advice appreciated :) &mdash;Sean Whitton / 10:41, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.
 * Ha, okay fair enough thanks. I'll see if I come across any smoother ways of doing things. &mdash;Sean Whitton / 11:09, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 14 and 21, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:35, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films July 2008 Newsletter
The July 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:16, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Discussion of my article Page
Pls favor in keeping deletion/discussion page of Brhmaand Pujan strictly confidential/un accesable as it is giving wrong signal to the seeker when it get hit on search engines.This has been requested by legal dept. of said pages. Under your expert guidence i may start this page soon. --Dralansun (talk) 03:14, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Don't Tell Me Promo Tour
I can see that this Madonna promo tour has been deleted. Is it possible to get access to the info on that page to put it into Madonna album page Music, this was the album the tour was promoting. This also happened with Madonna's Hard Candy Promo Tour which was merged into the Hard Candy page as "Promotional tour" section. You help would be appreciated. Thanks  J W A D  (talk)
 * My reply.
 * Many thanks for your help, I have added a modified version to the Music page.  J W A D  (talk)

Edit War on Historical powers
I reported 3RR violations at the 3RR noticeboard with with no response. Can you look into this, more warring has occurred since. Thanks -- Phoenix (talk) 04:53, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

WP:CHICAGO
Thanks for registering at WikiProject Chicago/members. You may want to get involved in the Meetup/Chicago 3. Also, be advised that the project is now trying to keep all the project's WP:PR, WP:FAC, WP:FAR, WP:GAR, WP:GAC WP:FLC, WP:FLRC, WP:FTC, WP:FPOC, WP:FPC, and WP:AFD discussion pages in one location at the new WikiProject Chicago/Review page. Please help add any discussion you are aware of at this location.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 17:08, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Graphics
I have made a proposal at WikiProject Graphics. When you have a chance, please review it and comment. Thanks! ~  JohnnyMrNinja  07:54, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

Thankyou
Just a little note to say thankyou for participating in my successful RFA candidacy, which passed with 96 supports, 0 opposes, and 1 neutral. I am pleasantly taken aback by the amount of support for me to contribute in an administrative role and look forward to demonstrating that such faith is well placed. Regards, WilliamH (talk) 08:54, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

WP:CHICAGO leadership
This month you have indicated new or continuing interest in WP:CHICAGO as either an active or semi-active member. The response to the project membership survey was strong enough that we should attempt to organize it in a more fully functional way. Please sign up at CHICAGO/leadership if you would be willing to serve as a leader of the project from September 1, 2008 to February 28, 2009. The various leadership responsibilities are listed there. The roles will be somewhat similar to the roles of WikiProject Military history/Coordinators. We are a less mature and developed project than WP:MILHIST however, so our division of roles will be slightly different. Please respond by the 23rd.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 18:49, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

"Like the 309"
I was away so i did not learn of the pending deletion notice for my article until it was done. The article was original and of value - it is about the last song ever written by Johhny Cash and the only - one as far as I recall - from his last album that did not have an article. I cannot undertand why it was deleted. If it is in your power, please press the undelent key! :-) Verne Equinox (talk) 00:33, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposal to rename WikiProject Graphics to WikiProject Images and Media
As a member of this WikiProject, your input is requested here before the outcome of this proposal is determined. Thanks. JPG-GR (talk) 16:12, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films roll call and coordinator elections
Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 04:09, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Forgive me
May I ask, why did you delete this article? The single is available and gaining airplay. — eon, 17:32, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * See also User_talk:Tikiwont. --Tikiwont (talk) 19:38, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Ta. — eon, 20:34, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

WikiProject Films August 2008 Newsletter
The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:25, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Arjun MBT
Hello. It looks like this tank was again deployed to the edit battlefield. You might want to have a look at it. De728631 (talk) 23:45, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Arjun tank...
Chanakyathegreat is back agian, pushing his POV on the Arjun tank article. I know you have participated in the discussions regarding the previous edit war. Please participate again, as I am getting a sick and tired of reverting to the consensus edit everytime Chanakyathegreat vandalizes it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by By78 (talk • contribs) 00:27, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

User: Bart Versieck
You may be interested in commenting on a discussion regarding the above noted user here. Cheers, CP 17:12, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Reported for misusing your Admin powers
You have been reported for misusing your Admins powers in support of Vandalization of Arjun MBT pages. You supported revert to edition by By78 knowing that it is against the rules, since I have done all edits by providing sources and the revert by By78 was his own personal opinion (may be based on ignorance or otherthings). If everyone will delete remove stuff from Wikipedia and Admins like you support such things Wikipedia will go blank.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 04:10, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 28, August 9, 11 and 18, 2008.
Sorry I haven't been sending this over the past few weeks. Ralbot (talk) 06:17, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:17, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

US Army Slang and Acronyms
Just wondering why the fuck you deleted this page since it was actually really helpful and useful. That was a lot of info and collaboration that you just wiped out.

XCarrot of Doomx (talk) 18:28, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
 * See Articles for deletion/List of U.S. Army acronyms and expressions. Glass  Cobra  18:53, 31 August 2008 (UTC)


 * My reply.


 * Was this transwikied to Wiktionary? Please reply there]. DCDuring (talk) 20:20, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

About Chanakyathegreat...
You are right, I will stop tempting him now. By78 (talk) 22:15, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Arjun MBT detail
Jauerback, you still don't get it. I will explain it in simple terms. The issue started with the the report of Winter trials and a one sided edit trying to tarnish the image of Arjun MBT along with speculation that Army may or may not go for further tanks. It's left to the Army leadership, Political leadership to take a decision on whether further orders will be placed or not. All these speculations has nothing to do with the tank. The Arjun MBT is a tank that is a superior to the T-90. The procurement division of the Army is corrupt or short sighted. It has nothing to do with the tank. The Army's preference to the T-90 may not be because Arjun is a bad tank. It may be because they are accosted to soviet tank tactics and love the T-72's and may like a similar strategy with the T-90. The Arjun is based on the Western concept of war fighting, in which crew protection is given preference. That's the reason tanks like M1 Abrams, Leopard are heavier tanks due to heavy armour to protect the tank. This is the reason for less number of Abrams tank crew causalities (said to be nil) against Iraqi tanks in the Gulf war. Arjun can travel faster than the T-90. Even T-90 has a lot of issues after its induction which has not been sorted. The procurement division is still insisting on the T-90 without the problems in T-90 being sorted. Also they are not conducting the comparitive trials of the Arjun and T-90. Arjun tank started as a tank with many problems, there were engine problems, there were issues with accuracy of the gun, there were issues with the tank electronics not functioning at high desert temperature and above all there were changes in the requirement specification of the tank by the Army incorporating new requirement. Today the tank has sorted out all those problems and is performing better than the T-90. The latest trial was the summer trials in which no issues of the tank was reported, that means the tank is performing perfectly. It is reported that and admitted by the Indian Army in a report to parliament that the first hit capability or the gun accuracy of the Arjun MBT is far superior to that of T-90. This may be because it uses the rifled gun like the Challenger 2. Also the Armour protection of the tank is similar or better to that of western MBT's. So the tank as such is an excellent tank.

Regarding the article which I edited includes the issues happened during the Winter trials and the summer trials. I had even removed the perception that By78 had over the Arjun because of the Winter summer trial mixup. He had accepted this fact. Now I hope you understood the matter better than before. You can reply to my talk page or in Arjun MBT talk page or in Administrators noticeboard as you feel.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 05:18, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 25 and September 8, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 21:41, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Arjun MBT arbitration
A request has been made for Arbitration of Arjun MBT issue.Requests for arbitration Chanakyathegreat (talk) 15:18, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: User:Chanakyathegreat
Thank you for the clarification.—  Dæ dαlusContribs /Improve 04:47, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films coordinator elections - voting now open!
Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 21:00, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 15, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:41, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Why now
Why did you revert it now. By78 is not doing because something need to be clarified, but it's deliberate. All links with detailed explanation exists but still act like a dumb person. This is deliberate. And why did you admin revert this edit. This is unacceptable. Do you have any source to claim the contrary whatever edits have been made with sources. If yes provide it or else please don't revert and support vandalism. If this is the case, I am going to remove anything I like from the pages in any article with just one link and then say I am not satisfied with any explanation and going in circle. This is stupid.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 13:48, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Jauerback, you are really ineligible to be an Admin. On what basis you issued the warning. How can you misunderstand such a basic thing. Did I say "He is dumb" or Did I say "he act like a dumb person". Seems pity that you cannot comprehend such a simple statement. What I want to convey was that He is real smart and is acting like a dumb person to make sure that his version stays. He can keep his version as long as this conversation keeps on going and you admins neglect the links and articles and reverts to his version. I want a revoke of that warning in my talk page and an apology from you.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 02:36, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

"By78 is not doing because something need to be clarified, but it's deliberate. All links with detailed explanation exists but still act like a dumb person. This is deliberate. And why did you admin revert this edit". This is what I asked. The word dumb there never means he is dumb you read it wrongly by saying I had called him dumb. Read it again, I said he is acting like a dumb person. The meaning of it is he is really smart and wants his version to stay and he is deliberately doing it. Also I request you to look at his edits. It also has a racist angle. Now don't come to me and say you called him a racist. Better you check his edits. He is showing signs of dislike for a particular race, otherwise one will not try deliberately attempt to tarnish the image of one race. It's not part of ordinary edits because we don't find it with anyother countries. Like when I edit Wikipedia, my subject is military matters and I do contribute to all articles and don't pinpoint something and inject negative views only about a particular race or country in the articles. Chanakyathegreat (talk) 02:52, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Leona Lewis
Can we please delete this? — eon, 01:42, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

WP:ANI notice
There is a discussion involving your editing at Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:14, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

WikiProject Films September 2008 Newsletter
The September 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also note that after the roll call for active members, we've cleared the specialized delivery lists. Feel free to sign-up in the relevant sections again! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:27, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Fabyan Windmill Stamp - 1980.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Fabyan Windmill Stamp - 1980.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 16:24, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Arjun Article...
Hi there. I took action to remove some clear POV pushing by Chanakyathegreat for the Arjun article. I have opened a new section in the discussions to document what he has done. It is getting ridiculous. May I suggest we go back to the previous, and still standing, agreement that Chanakya submit his changes for peer review before incorporating them into the actual article. I seriously do not have the time to fix his mess. By78 (talk) 02:35, 4 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I think I'm done with him. Is there any point in allowing this charade to go on any further?  I can respect a difference of opinion (including a hostile difference) but this is just poisoning the well.  It's impossible for anyone to work with someone who just doesn't seem to care about anything other than what he wants.  You know this stuff better than me, whatever you feel like I'll support. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 04:07, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


 * To be quite frank, I don't think there is much point in reasoning with him. We've had the same problem with Chanakya pushing his POV over at great power before. He quite clearly has a Megalomaniacal point of view, insisting on representing what he calls the "truth" or "reality". He would constantly revert to his "version" which he interpreted as the neutral one. All appeals for compromise have failed and the issue ended up dragging on for over 8 months. Short blocks have not seemed to work; perhaps more long-term intervention is necessary. Nirvana888 (talk) 04:32, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.


 * I think long-term intervention is necessary. By78 (talk) 22:30, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

résumés
Hi Jauerback.

You've linked to WP:RESUME on an AFD. There's a discussion about that essay going on at Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia is not the place to post your résumé - you might want to join in. --Hugh Charles Parker (talk - contribs) 19:17, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Tonex's album pages
I just saw the message stating that the pages for Tonex's albums Rainbow EP, The Naked Truth, Ain't Remyx, and Tonéx Presents MSS Dynasty: The Hostile Takeover might be deleted. I do not know why they would be deleted. Please tell me what Wikipedia policies were violated so that I can make the necessary changes.

Thank you

unsigned comment added by DreSoul (talk • contribs) 1:14, 10 October 2008
 * My reply.

Deletion of Tonex's album pages
Thanks for responding. I'm still fairly new to the whole Wikipedia process so I'm still unsure of some of the lingo. What does it mean if something is not "notable"?

unsigned comment added by DreSoul (talk • contribs) 7:44, 10 October 2008
 * My reply.

Unwanted reversals
I am totally disappointed with your intervention in each and every edits that I make. I think you have taken it personally. Can you provide the reasoning for reverting my edit partially. The reason that you gave is "Reverted to revision 242889320 by John; add your information if you wish, but don't delete whole paragraphs because you are simply "updating".". This is not the Wiki rule. Anything can be added and removed with sources. Here is the source. What's the problem (if any) that you noticed in my edit and what argument and source you can put forth to validate your reversal?Chanakyathegreat (talk) 06:03, 13 October 2008 (UTC)


 * My reply.


 * Have you checked what is there in the link I provided and why I had removed certain sections. Your explanation is not enough. Those info on the page are outdated and hence I had replaced it with the latest info and a latest link. Now why did you revert to age old info which is incorrect. You did it with Arjun. That page is the most ugly pages today with lot of misinformation, contradiction etc. I had asked you guys to reply to the Summer 2006 section of Arjun. Still has not got any reply. When I change it after a long wait you guys will appear to block me as usual.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 13:37, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.
 * So you are threatening me with a block for asking you to explain why you reverted without providing valid reason? Is this expected of a Wikipedia administrator? You have still not explained why you reverted it? Did you check the link and read it's content and what made you think that that edit is invalid and hence need to be reverted?Chanakyathegreat (talk) 14:22, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.


 * So the threat was for editing the Arjun MBT article. It is a no go area for me right. O.K. But still you did not explain what's that you found inappropriate with the MCA edit and what wrong I did by removing certain points? Now about the Arjun, I have decided to go section by section to clear the sections of all contradictions and errors. I had asked for clarification in the Summer 2006 section of the Arjun page. Still not got any replies from Admins. And if I edit that sections, you guys will block me. Atleast answer to those questions asked by providing links and quoting from those linked article.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 14:38, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.


 * From your reply, I can conclude that you did not read the content of the link provided. You did not check the content in the article and what I had removed. Both are synonymous. I had removed the outdated info and replaced it by providing a latest source. The earlier one was based on speculation and without links. So why did you revert then?Chanakyathegreat (talk) 14:57, 13 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Chanakya, the earlier edit DID have sources, and as a matter of fact, THREE of them (two of which came from you, no less). Just to make sure we get this fact straight, here are the sources for the 2006 Trials section, as listed in the current version of the article: 1)http://www.hinduonnet.com/2007/05/13/stories/2007051301111000.htm 2)http://www.business-standard.com/india/storypage.php?autono=320574 and 3)http://www.indianexpress.com/news/arjun-main-battle-tanked/16589/1.  1) and 2) are provided by you, and 3) by me.  So what is this monkey business of claiming that the edit had no sources?  From your reply above, I must conclude that you must be malfunctioning.  By78 (talk) 15:43, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.
 * Ooops. Thanks for pointing that out.  Today is not a reading day for me.  To Chanakya, I apologize for my above remarks.  By78 (talk) 19:41, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Requests for arbitration
Requests for arbitration has been made on the Arjun MBT page.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 06:00, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Arjun MBT
A new edit request for the Summer 2006 Arjun MBT page has been added. Expecting a reply or correction of the same in the Summer 2006 section.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 05:37, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Vandal combo
I forgot to add three to my vandal combo box after an IP address vandal continuously left faggett, fag, and other things. He is now blocked, so i added three.(Planecrash111 (talk) 05:10, 2 November 2008 (UTC))

Block evasion
70.210.72.75 is vandalizing Capitalism, and appears to be 98.28.166.108 again evading your block. Cosmic Latte (talk) 20:47, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Reported to AIV, as well. Cosmic Latte (talk) 20:56, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films October 2008 Newsletter
The October 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have suggestions or comments related to the newsletter, please leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you and happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk) 09:02, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Pop Tarts
so what did happen; a —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brandon Rochelle (talk • contribs) 20:29, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

you have lwft 2 messages on my sigun page, what is it that you need to say to me hello. Brandon Rochelle (talk) 20:39, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply

please take it easy i was just asking for some help and abvice. And you are doing a lot of revertions too. Brandon Rochelle (talk) 20:48, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

please settle down i was not meaining to offend i dont know why you are getting bent out of shapw. Brandon Rochelle (talk) 21:33, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

I just think your attitude is a bit harsh that's all. Brandon Rochelle (talk) 22:03, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
 * My reply.

Ok thank you. How did you find me anyway? I am new to wiki-pedia. Brandon Rochelle (talk) 22:41, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 17, 2008 and before.
Because the Signpost hasn't been sent in a while, to save space, I've condensed all seven issues that were not sent into this archive. Only the three issues from November are below.

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 11:06, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Loma Linda University
Thanks for your recent work on the Loma Linda University article. Hopefully now we can get some of that silliness behind us and move forward to expand the article. Brianweedster (talk) 05:59, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

RfA thanks
design by neurolysis | to add this barnstar to your awards page, simply copy and paste and remove this bottom text | if you don't like thankspam, please accept my sincere apologies

WikiProject Films November 2008 Newsletter
The November 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. My apologies for the late delivery, and thanks go to both Wildroot and Erik for writing the newsletter. Remember that anyone can edit the newsletter, so feel free to help out! Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 08:31, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Arjun MBT
Requesting Admins to correct the Summer 2006 section of the page based on the discussion (Check Talk page). If you have any questions on the discussion or any apprehension about the subject that can be asked in the talk page and I will answer. Thank you.Chanakyathegreat (talk) 13:40, 19 December 2008 (UTC)