User talk:Mr. C.C./Archive 2

To talk about general Wikipedia items such as general usage, how to start a page, or if you'd like to leave me a comment, a criticism, a question or whatever then please go to my talk page by clicking here. Please don't create a new heading for each topic. '''Please make sure you sign your name or else you will be ignored. Only signed messages will be responded to.'''

Jack Conte
Thanks for taking an interest in the article! Couple questions: when has Jack Conte played the Ukelele? And why do you consider Danielle Ate The Sandwich an associated act? I see they played a show right before Pomplamoose on November 13, 2009, but would that constitute being associated with them? I'm not really familiar with the details, so maybe you know something I don't. Thanks again.  Jujutacular  T · C 20:50, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the follow-up :)  Jujutacular  T · C 22:31, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

List of youtube personalities
Hi, your edits were good but one nitpick, please add comments to your changes, it is much nicer for people who review you changes. --Gnepets (talk) 13:33, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter February 2010
Last edition · Next edition

Hello and welcome back to the WikiProject Saskatchewan newsletter! I, User:Presidentman, am the new editor. You may see some changes due to the fact it's my first newsletter. I'm just going easy on myself, but it will get more complex as time goes on.

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page. → Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 01:20, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Chip Esten
Does File:Chip Esten on 10-17-09.jpg this image look normal to you. It's really squished to me and looks terrible. It isn't a size issue, it's something with the original image and/or due to how it was resized. tedder (talk) 05:32, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, just a reminder that you're both very close to 3RR on this one. Any further reversions could result in a block. Katr67 (talk) 18:18, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Final discussion for Requests for comment/Biographies of living people
Hello, I note that you have commented on the first phase of Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

As this RFC closes, there are two proposals being considered:
 * 1) Proposal to Close This RfC
 * 2) Alternate proposal to close this RFC: we don't need a whole new layer of bureaucracy

Your opinion on this is welcome. Okip  02:17, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter March 2010
Last issue · Next issue

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page. → Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 09:23, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Battlebowl. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  TJ   Spyke   20:58, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Nigahiga
Not sure what you meant here, as my edits removed earlier vandalism and did some additional cleanup. TN X Man 17:00, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Edward Chastain
Hello Fishhead2100. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Edward Chastain, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Thank you. Nancy talk  10:41, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Re: bolding
Correct. Per a discussion last summer, we separate finishing and signature moves into two lists rather than using bolding to distinguish between them. See WP:PW/SG for further details. And thank you for the invitation to the deletion discussion, but I prefer to spend my time improving and fixing articles, rather than arguing about their merits. Thanks, ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 21:51, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll take your word for it. I don't have time to go look at the article, inspect the sources, do a search of my own to see if there are more sources available, and then make a decision about the article. I'm extremely pressed for time at the moment, and have decided to devote my time to editing articles rather than participating in discussions, etc. unless I deem it critical to do so. A deletion discussion does not fit my description of critical, therefore I will not be a part of that discussion. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 22:11, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Julia Nunes
Please answer the questions I pose on the talk page, or produce a cite that supports what you are adding to the Julia Nunes. I have asked you repeatedly to cite what you insist on having there, but you have not done so. I have even asked you to describe how you personally would describe the "Acoustic genre", but can't offer a satisfactory description that doesn't involve listing other genres of vastly varying types. Can you not see that this suggests that what you are describing isn't a genre, but a description of how you might play a genre?? "Acoustic Rock" is Rock played on acoustic instruments. "Acoustic jazz" is Jazz played acoustically. "Acoustic" by itself is nothing but a description of Nunes' instruments, it does not describe the music she plays on them.

This cannot be resolved unless you are willing to discuss it and rote declarations that "It is a genre" won't suffice. You need to demonstrate this. Why don't you create a Acoustic (music genre) article? -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 23:29, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * You say you have provided sources where "Acoustic" is identified as a genre, but I'm afraid I am unable to find them. Could you please provide me a link to where you did this? -- Escape Orbit  (Talk) 09:56, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * By the way, the third link on your signature doesn't work. I think it's supposed to go to Special:Contributions/Fishhead2100, but instead goes to User_contributions:Fishhead2100.  -- Escape Orbit  (Talk) 10:00, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi. Have you found where you provided those sources? I know it must be difficult to locate, as I've already looked myself. If you can't find them, could you please let me know all the same, so I can remove the mention of it from the article as contested and unsourced. Thanks. -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 00:01, 24 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you. To examine your points;
 * Are you seriously suggesting that your MySpace page is a reliable source?? Indeed, I haven't 'bothered' to look at your MySpace page.  Editors' self-published websites can never be considered as a source for anything.
 * This one states upfront in the opening paragraph that the competition is for "Acoustic artists in various genres". So clearly "Acoustic" is not a genre in itself.
 * This one is about the folk genre and says "Traditional folk music is a culturally specific, regional music made by the "folk," for the "folk," using acoustic (usually stringed) instrumentation". Nothing about Acoustic being a genre, but rather that the genre of Traditional folk is played on acoustic instruments.
 * The last one indeed mentions Acoustic as a genre, but its definition is rather vague. It would appear that it is music played on an acoustic instrument.  The actual genre of the music performed could be any, so I would suggest that the person quoted is using the term genre rather loosely.  It's worth noting that he also defines the artists discussed as singer-songwriters and/or solo (music) performers, if "Acoustic" is a genre, why aren't these genres too?  But really, is this the best cite you have? A quote voicing the opinion of one person who happens to say "genre"?
 * Please stop asking me to produce a cite that proves a negative. It's illogical, not Wikipedia policy and betrays a fundamental misunderstanding on your part.  The burden of proof lies with you, not with me.
 * So, to sum up;
 * You have failed to produce a suitable cite that defines "Acoustic" as a genre.
 * You have studiously avoided even providing a definition for the genre yourself.
 * The wikilink you are adding as a genre links to a page that makes no mention of "Acoustic" being a genre.
 * You have no interest in creating a Wikipedia article on a genre that you claim exists, but is notably absent from the encyclopaedia.
 * You do not understand (or choose to ignore) Wikipedia policy on verifiability or reliable sources.
 * You ignore questions directed at you and claim the issue is settled, because you say it is.


 * As it is impossible to get any real attempt from you to build consensus I intend to request a third opinion.-- Escape Orbit (Talk) 11:33, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

I've explained this a number of times. Please read this link to policy. I don't need to provide links, you do. I can no more provide a reference to say that acoustic isn't a genre any more than I can provide a reference to say it isn't a flavour of bagel. My request for a third opinion has produced a suggested compromise. Please read it on the talk page. -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 15:15, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't get why you are making such an issue of her music being "not pop", but your edit added is unsourced. So can you please add a reference ? Galf (talk) 20:23, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, I did reference it, a simple Google search provided that source. Maybe you could do the same for your edits?Galf (talk) 20:36, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I appreciate your concerns about my civility, however I fail to see how my suggestion that you use Google to find sources is somehow offensive.Galf (talk) 21:54, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Re: PWI 500
A discussion here mentions "there have been discussions in the past. The consensus was to list only a wrestler's top PWI 500 rating (and position in the top 500 of the PWI years as well as ranking in PWI's top 100 tag teams of the PWI years)." I believe these discussions were before I joined the project, but it is a long-standing consensus. The reason for it is it would make the C&A section too long - could you imagine HBK/The Undertaker's articles if we listed every PWI 500 ranking they got? Of course if you disagree, feel free to bring it up at WT:PW and see what they say. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 13:06, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Notability (organizations and companies)
You have recently participated in discussion at an AFD for a broadcast station. I have recently posted the above topic on the talk page of the notability guideline for organizations and companies, to see if there is interest in adding language related to the notability of radio and TV broadcast stations to that guideline. Your input would be most welcome. Thanks. Edison (talk) 01:31, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

London Irish Amateur
Just to let you know, the AFD has been re-opened on the page as the user who opened it has mistakenly taken some vandalism as legitamate edits so could you close it again as he still has the same reason for deletion as last time? The C of E.          God Save The Queen! (talk) 07:17, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I'd suggest you don't "close" it, as you're not an admin, and your previous closure is outside of policy. Let the time run. Cynof  G  avuf 11:08, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

You'll never believe it, but CynofGavuf has started another AFD for London Irish Amateur's deletion and again using the amateur club as a reason but expanding on it a bit more this time. I think you may need to step in again. The C of E.          God Save The Queen! (talk) 19:29, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Quietly
Just want to point out that if I had given OlYeller the info he wanted, he would have used it to attack me via another user. I have already applied WP:IPAT against him. Thanks for your input. ' !! Just a Punk !! ' 23:07, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
 * It will. Like I said, I'm ignoring him now per the dispute resolution essays here. Thanks again.  !! Just a Punk !!  23:28, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Justa never gave me the proof I asked for and still hasn't. He used another misleading comment to argue with the IP user which I've again pointed out to be false  on the talk page.  Justa seems to use stretching the truth to prove whatever point he wants.  The issue of the article is all but finished but I worry that his arguements will be troublesome for the project.  My guess it that, being a member of the pro wrestling project, Justa has to deal with a lot of BS edits.  Being stern and quoting policies and guidelines in the way he does is a very easy way to deal with those users.  If Justa is willing, I would be willing to discuss this situation with mediation. Constantly saying that I'm attacking him doesn't get us anywhere and I'm worried that he's falsely discussed me in more places than this.  Ol Yeller  '''Talktome 15:26, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Before I take action, does this look like socking to you? It sure looks like it to me.  An IP user shows up on the page and makes this edit on the article (agreeing with Punk) and this edit on the talk page (agreeing with Punk).  If you look at the edit history of the IP, you can see that it was used to archive part of Punk's talk page.  That doesn't mean it's Justa but if you look at Justa's talk page history, you can see where he says that he forgot to log in while archiving.  I don't see how there's any way to explain this other than socking.  I'm interested in your view before I move on.  Ol Yeller  '''Talktome 03:56, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Your eyes please...
I would ask that you might revisit the discussion at Articles for deletion/Aril (singer/actor) and revisit the article on Aril (singer/actor). Since your comments of two days ago, I think I have addressed concerns and given it a decent chance to survive and serve the project. Thanks,  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 23:53, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

High Importance Saskatchewan Category
Hi there! You left a note about a spelling mistake in the above forementioned category, perhaps it has been fixed already? Kind Regards SriMesh | talk  14:41, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Reply
He did only speculate that I was talking about him elsewhere. Completely untrue. I'm ignoring him as agreed. I really don't want to hear any more about it. For the record, my nephew was here today and the time of the edits mentioned match when he was on my computer. I've told my brother to discipline him because he lied to me. He's got a habit of trying to help and not thinking. ' !! Just a Punk !! ' 08:42, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

You made some constructive comments....
I'd wonder how you feel about the article now? See A Practical Reference to Religious Diversity for Operational Police and Emergency Services. Smkolins (talk) 16:59, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter message
It has recently been brought to the attention of WP:PW that the newsletter is being to delivered to several users who have not been actively editing for several months. As a result, their talk pages have become increasingly large, unmanageable and slow to load due to a lack of archiving. In response, this message is being sent to all editors listed in Category:WikiProject Professional wrestling participants to say that anyone who does not list their name at WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Active before May 16 will be automatically listed at WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Nospam, and will no longer receive the newsletter or any notification of it. If you are added to WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Nospam, please feel free to remove your name if you desire. If you wish to continue receiving the newsletter as normal, please add your name to WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Active. If you simply wish to receive notification of a new issue, but not have the full newsletter delivered to your talk page, please add your name to the notification only list. If you have any queries please contact me at my talk page or leave a message at WT:PW. Thank you for your co-operation. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 00:36, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

RE
No source was added with the reign addition. It is currently an FLC so not until a source was added or FIP's site was updated could it be added. That is why I removed it until after their site was updated.-- Will C  04:03, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The other information is covered by the general references if they do not have their individual reference. Twitter isn't regarded an a trustworthy source, and even if it was, the link has to be provided. It is guidelines, no source for questionable information, than it isn't included. No ref was added and the general references did not cover he new reign at the time either.-- Will C  23:56, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

CZW Wired TV Championship
Just so we don't get into any kind of edit war, you can't have a Combined Reigns List if there are no Reigns to Combine. Afro ( DontTazeMeBro ) - Afkatk 13:22, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter June 2010
Last edition · Next edition

Hello, and welcome back to the WikiProject Saskatchewan newsletter. Sorry about the last two months, I have just been very busy with exams and the end of my studies. Now that summer is here, hopefully I'll do better.

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page. → Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 10:15, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Socoglio has done it again
Socoglio has deleted the info concerning the allegations of misconduct of Corentine Quiniou on the 2nd of June on the french edition of wikipedia. Meanwhile it has been restored again and the entire page has been reviewed.--Konuzelmann Thomas (talk) 21:35, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Amy Hennig (wrestler)


The article Amy Hennig (wrestler) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Doesn't meet WP:ATHLETE as she hasn't worked in a top promotion. Doesn't meet WP:ENTERTAINER or WP:GNG as there are no reliable third party sources in existence.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nikki ♥  311   03:27, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
- Talk to you later, Presidentman (talk) Random Picture of the Day 13:03, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter July 2010
Last edition · Next edition

Hello, and welcome to the WikiProject Saskatchewan newsletter. Happy Canada Day to all!

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page. → Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 11:00, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Jack Conte merge
I don't really understand your edit summary:. I really do feel there is consensus to merge however. At the very least it is past time to make a decision. Perhaps we could inquire somewhere to have the discussion closed? (I don't really feel strongly either way, I'm just tired of the "merge" banner at the top of the article).  Jujutacular  T · C 19:06, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Can you request someone to close the merge discussion? I would do it, but I don't want to appear like I'm finding a friend to close it the way I want (as I've already tried to merge it). I will be content with whomever you choose.  Jujutacular  T · C 02:53, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

-   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 15:13, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter August 2010
Last edition · Next edition

Hello, and welcome to the WikiProject Saskatchewan newsletter. Happy Saskatchewan Day to all!

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page. → Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 10:14, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter September 2010
Last edition · Next edition

Hello, and welcome to the WikiProject Saskatchewan newsletter. Happy Labour Day to all!

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page. → Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 06:49, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Notable Aboriginal people of Canada
Hello there. I think that adding just the SK portion of the WP:CA banner to the talk page will let the SK wikiproject know about the template ratings of importance and quality, checking off the community tab as well will provide ratings for the communities and neighbourhoods area of the SK wikiproject... I think the SKCN needs two areas checkmarked, and the provincial articles only need one...similar to Canada music or Canada sports, they each need two areas as well to show up by region and by subject. Is this what you are asking about? SriMesh | talk  04:10, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I am not sure if this particular article really particularly belongs in a community type of subject area...unless someone checked off communities because the folks talked about on the page came from divers communities, but that does not necessarily mean the communities persay are described. Kind Regards me again.SriMesh |  talk  04:13, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Chefdb name
Template:Chefdb name has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 19:32, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of IWA East Coast Heavyweight Championship


The article IWA East Coast Heavyweight Championship has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable championship for a company that fails WP:CORP.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nikki ♥  311   23:25, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Canadian Unified Junior Heavyweight Championship


The article Canadian Unified Junior Heavyweight Championship has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Championship for a company that doesn't meet WP:CORP.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nikki ♥  311   23:26, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Canadian Unified Junior Heavyweight Championship for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Canadian Unified Junior Heavyweight Championship, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Canadian Unified Junior Heavyweight Championship until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Nikki ♥  311   01:10, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of IWA East Coast Heavyweight Championship for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article IWA East Coast Heavyweight Championship, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/IWA East Coast Heavyweight Championship until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Nikki ♥  311   19:03, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Just the Way You Are (Bruno Mars song). Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Yvesnimmo (talk) 08:36, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * None taken. I was just confused because your edit didn't really do anything at all. Yvesnimmo (talk) 09:05, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't see it...? Yvesnimmo (talk) 16:13, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The change. It's still one column to me? :S Yvesnimmo (talk) 19:04, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, not there... :\ Yvesnimmo (talk) 19:59, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Figured it out. It's only browsers with CSS 3 that show it and not all of them do. Yvesnimmo (talk) 20:35, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Let's get some things straight
a) Blogs aren't reliable sources. b) There is nothing wrong with demanding good quality sources, in fact, the opposite is true. c) High standards of referencing should be applied to BLPs. d) Re: this edit summary, why? Me asking him wouldn't be a reliable source. e) That edit eummary smacks of childishness and sour grapes because I refused to allow you to post a link to your blog. f) Edit warring to re-insert information that is unreliably sourced on a BLP/re-insert a link to your blog is not a good idea. Nici Vampire  Heart  09:45, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I know, I saw. Wasn't that difficult now was it? Nici  Vampire  Heart  08:59, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Have a nice day. Nici  Vampire  Heart  09:08, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Re: Ray William Johnson
I understand your feelings in this case and I share them. Unfortunately, I do not know what to do. I cannot act as an admin and as an user, I can only try to talk to people. Unfortunately, if they refuse to accept the facts, there is little we can do. What might work is if you started an RFC on the issue to reach a solid consensus that can be used as an argument in future discussions. The better alternative would be to find some sources and put him on the list but unfortunately, those sources simply don't exist, so RFC is probably the best way forward now. Regards  So Why  21:04, 21 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Just don't raise to the bait. People sometimes think that personally attacking another user is helpful but we all know it isn't. As I said above, start an RFC and allow others, who are not involved, to voice their opinions. Both you and me, just like those in favor of Mr. Johnson are far too involved at this point to be able to solve this. Regards  So Why  19:55, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Are you an admin?
Because if you're not, you're simply grandstanding on the YouTube celebrities article. You're enforcing your opinion of Wikipedia guidelines instead of acting as a Wiki admin. PokeHomsar (talk) 06:29, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Poke, I would give this one up until CNN does a story on Johnson and others. Fishhead has an issue with this and is clearly not reasonable. I am not a RWJ fan -- in fact, I think it is a bit of a hack... he rips off viral videos and has created fame with them. His humour is course and, frankly, hardly humor. This does not change the fact that he BELONGS on a list of YouTube personalities. The references prove that out. His status on YouTube proves that out. Fishhead, I think, just enjoys being obstructive and controlling. Peterchasefx (talk) 16:19, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Talk:List_of_YouTube_personalities
Courtesy link, even though it is a go no where "proposal" C T J F 8 3  18:35, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I Agree with the above! Personal influence and attacks on others is not how someone should act on WP and they have violated that. Ban! Ban!Underwoodl06 (talk) 03:03, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Ray William Johnson

 * In response to your comment on my talkpage: I am not impressed with how you have conducted yourself in the debates over Mr. Johnson's notability, so if you want to accuse me of being juvenile, go right ahead. However, I would ask that you do not nominate it for deletion yourself, because you have made this a personal issue for yourself and would likely find it difficult to be objective.  I regularly include parentheticals in citations to convey relevant information contained in the source.  To claim that there's no information in the "article that people don't know" seems odd; I am sure there are people on earth who know not of Mr. Johnson, an encyclopedia is where they find that information.--Milowent • talkblp-r  07:04, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Are you serious?
Do you have nothing better to do with your life than attack me? You're the one trolling the YouTube celebrities page, not me. PokeHomsar (talk) 21:28, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Seriously
Seriously, stop removing RWJ now. He has his own Wikipedia page now, which is filled with links. I added a bunch of links for him on the page to satisfy you. You do not just unilaterally remove RWJ after he'd been on the list for over a week. This is what the talk page is for. Discuss it there if you wish to remove him again. Do not do this again. PokeHomsar (talk) 04:19, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Stop it
Uncivil borderline WP:LEGAL/religious comment removed-- Terrillja talk  18:17, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * C.C., this is your last warning. Do not continue to remove Ray William Johnson from List of YouTube personalities unless a consensus to that effect is developed on the talk page of the list article.  The trolling is not amusing, and I will not suffer your continued vandalism to the project. Please!! stop it.--Milowent • talkblp-r  09:37, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Terrillja, if that was uncivil, I am sure you will be permabanning C.C. for his conduct shortly. We must guard wikipedia against insidious ridiculousness as that which has been perpetrated by C.C.--Milowent • talkblp-r  19:33, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * If you have an issue, there are proper ways to discuss it and venues to get outside input. Not namecalling and acting juvenile. That goes for both of you.-- Terrillja talk  19:39, 6 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Replying to your comment on my talk page under "Mad": Luckily, wikipedia does not operate only on your personal opinions. We're all entitled to our opinions, but you are on notice to stop acting without consensus in this area. I'd note that the RWJ article made Did You Know? today, which it could not have done free of your alleged concerns.--Milowent • talkblp-r 21:09, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Do not censor other peoples comments!
Censoring profanity in other peoples comments is considered extremely rude. You are allowed to do remove personal attacks, but never do something like again. Yoenit (talk) 11:50, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
 * You did censor out the words "hell", "fucking" and "damn" in this edit. From your reply it appears you were not aware of this, are perhaps running a profanity filter of some kind which could have automatically changed these words? Yoenit (talk) 12:43, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of JWP Project Junior Championship


The article JWP Project Junior Championship has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Championship in a promotion that doesn't meet WP:CORP.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nikki ♥  311   21:20, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of JWP Project Openweight Championship


The article JWP Project Openweight Championship has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Championship in a promotion that doesn't meet WP:CORP.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nikki ♥  311   21:21, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of NWA Canadian Light Heavyweight Championship


The article NWA Canadian Light Heavyweight Championship has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Title in a promotion that doesn't meet WP:CORP.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nikki ♥  311   19:12, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of NWA Canadian Light Heavyweight Championship for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NWA Canadian Light Heavyweight Championship is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/NWA Canadian Light Heavyweight Championship until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Nikki ♥  311   04:02, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of DGUSA United We Stand for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DGUSA United We Stand is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/DGUSA United We Stand until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 22:28, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Ray William Johnson
Please do not add inappropriate language to an article's talk page, as you did at Talk:Ray William Johnson Doing so is not in accordance to our policies. Abhijay Talk?/Deeds  04:25, 30 December 2011 (UTC) Abhijay Talk?/Deeds  04:36, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

ok....
I would prefer it if we kept any discussion where it was started, feel free to do that on my talk page. Dbrodbeck (talk) 13:44, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Saskatoon
Hi. I was wondering why you reverted my edit on the Saskatoon page and tagged it as vandalism even though it was clearly not the case.  Rockysmile11  (talk)

Ichthus: January 2012
 In this issue...   - Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here
 * From the Editor
 * What are You doing For Lent?
 * Fun and Exciting Contest Launched
 * Spotlight on WikiProject Catholicism

Disambiguation link notification for March 6
Hi. When you recently edited Norman Smiley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manager (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Laura Calder editing
Someone from Wikipedia is helping me do this. Stop telling me what to do and leave me alone. Please. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mynymail (talk • contribs) 19:18, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Acoustic Julia Nunes
Again? We went over this at great length two years ago. Do you have a new source to back up your claim of a genre, or even a Wikipedia page describing the genre? Or are we just going to go through the same discussion as before? I've tried to explain my position, but if you believe that you can prove that Bob Dylan played the same genre as Luiz Gonzaga, both of whom undeniably played Acoustic music (the link you are adding to Julia Nunes genre field), I would be happy hear your reasoning. -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 21:23, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
 * You are now edit warring. You know better than to do this.  Please revert your edit and discuss on the talk page. -- Escape Orbit  (Talk) 00:01, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * You are still edit warring. You decline support your changes, or respond to what I've said on the talk page and cannot explain why you are linking the genre field to a page with no mention of genre.  Unless you can explain otherwise, I have no option but to conclude you want this change simply because you like it and you want it, no matter what the facts are.
 * Either demonstrate that;
 * * A - there is a genre called "Acoustic Music" (and perhaps create a Wikipedia article that explains what it is).
 * * B - Nunes plays this "Acoustic Music" genre (preferably with a cite)
 * Or cease re-entering this unsourced, unsupported information. Thanks. -- Escape Orbit  (Talk) 16:17, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] This is your last chance to revert your change back to the prior consensus before I report you. One on the basic principles of Wikipedia is that is your responsibility to verify your edits when challenged, or they may be removed.  I have given you ample opportunity to do this, but you have refused.  -- Escape Orbit  (Talk) 13:06, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Mr. C.C., please see the opinion I gave at Talk:Julia_Nunes. You're a good, experienced editor and have an unblemished block log. Please, show good faith by revering your last reversion and following proper processes to make your case rather than by just continuing to revert. I know from experience that something like this can stick in one's craw and become a knee-jerk sore point, but you're better than that. Best regards, TransporterMan  ( TALK ) 15:33, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Belated reply
Hello Fishhead, Just letting you know that I replied to your message on my talk page. Tim 1357  talk  23:01, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

List of neighbourhoods in Saskatoon
--Drm310 (talk) 13:15, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

WP:Anglican navbox colour discussion
Hullo, fellow WikiProject-er. We're having a discussion about the colours of Anglicanism navboxes. Please do come along and weigh in. DBD 18:16, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

ok....
I would prefer it if we kept any discussion where it was started, feel free to do that on my talk page. Dbrodbeck (talk) 13:44, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Saskatoon
Hi. I was wondering why you reverted my edit on the Saskatoon page and tagged it as vandalism even though it was clearly not the case.  Rockysmile11  (talk)

Ichthus: January 2012
 In this issue...   - Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here
 * From the Editor
 * What are You doing For Lent?
 * Fun and Exciting Contest Launched
 * Spotlight on WikiProject Catholicism

Disambiguation link notification for March 6
Hi. When you recently edited Norman Smiley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manager (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Laura Calder editing
Someone from Wikipedia is helping me do this. Stop telling me what to do and leave me alone. Please. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mynymail (talk • contribs) 19:18, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Acoustic Julia Nunes
Again? We went over this at great length two years ago. Do you have a new source to back up your claim of a genre, or even a Wikipedia page describing the genre? Or are we just going to go through the same discussion as before? I've tried to explain my position, but if you believe that you can prove that Bob Dylan played the same genre as Luiz Gonzaga, both of whom undeniably played Acoustic music (the link you are adding to Julia Nunes genre field), I would be happy hear your reasoning. -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 21:23, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
 * You are now edit warring. You know better than to do this.  Please revert your edit and discuss on the talk page. -- Escape Orbit  (Talk) 00:01, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
 * You are still edit warring. You decline support your changes, or respond to what I've said on the talk page and cannot explain why you are linking the genre field to a page with no mention of genre.  Unless you can explain otherwise, I have no option but to conclude you want this change simply because you like it and you want it, no matter what the facts are.
 * Either demonstrate that;
 * * A - there is a genre called "Acoustic Music" (and perhaps create a Wikipedia article that explains what it is).
 * * B - Nunes plays this "Acoustic Music" genre (preferably with a cite)
 * Or cease re-entering this unsourced, unsupported information. Thanks. -- Escape Orbit  (Talk) 16:17, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] This is your last chance to revert your change back to the prior consensus before I report you. One on the basic principles of Wikipedia is that is your responsibility to verify your edits when challenged, or they may be removed.  I have given you ample opportunity to do this, but you have refused.  -- Escape Orbit  (Talk) 13:06, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Mr. C.C., please see the opinion I gave at Talk:Julia_Nunes. You're a good, experienced editor and have an unblemished block log. Please, show good faith by revering your last reversion and following proper processes to make your case rather than by just continuing to revert. I know from experience that something like this can stick in one's craw and become a knee-jerk sore point, but you're better than that. Best regards, TransporterMan  ( TALK ) 15:33, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Belated reply
Hello Fishhead, Just letting you know that I replied to your message on my talk page. Tim 1357  talk  23:01, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

List of neighbourhoods in Saskatoon
--Drm310 (talk) 13:15, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

WP:Anglican navbox colour discussion
Hullo, fellow WikiProject-er. We're having a discussion about the colours of Anglicanism navboxes. Please do come along and weigh in. DBD 18:16, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

April - National Contribution Month
Good day Fishhead2100,

During the month of April, Wikimedia Canada is preparing the National Contribution Month, and we are looking for experienced contributors to organize a contribution day (or half-day) in their region.

Contribution days are activities where Wikipedia's contributors, students, or anybody interested in contributing to Wikipedia meets together to collectively improve a predetermined theme. This meetings generally take place in library where references are easy of access, but can be organized in any communal room. Beside improving articles, a goal of this participatory workshops is to initiate neophyte in the cooperative contribution of Wikipedia.

If you are interested in organizing or participating in a contribution day in your region, communicate witht he national team on the project's talk page. The exact agenda of each local event is left to the discretion of the organizer. Help is available for the organization from contributors who already organized these type of days, so don't be worried. If you have any questions or want more information, don't hesitate to contact us.

Amqui (talk) 00:41, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Melanie Cruise
Yeah it was locked before because it was at AFD and she was deemed not to be notable enough. However I've looked over this article and I think she is notable enough now so have moved it to Melanie Cruise.--5 albert square (talk) 21:35, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

WP:FOOD Needs You!
Hi there Fishhead2100! I've noticed you have yourself listed as a member of the Food and Drink Wikiproject. Unfortunately it looks like the project has been slowly sliding into inactivity except for a couple of people. That makes me a sad potato, and nobody likes a sad potato amirite?

If you'd like to turn my frown upside down, can you do two small things?

First off, go here and add Tick (✅) next to your name if you're still part of the project.

Second, go to the project talkpage and participate in a discussion about how to make the project more active, and how to go about making articles in our area of interest a lot better.

You don't want to make me cry, do you? Potatoes have a lot of eyes you know. So come on, join in! :)

— The Potato Hose 18:34, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Wikiproject Food and Drink Newsletter - September 2013

 * Posted by Northamerica1000(talk) 02:11, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

WP:Food
It would be appreciated if you joined in the conversation occurring at WT:Food regarding the layout and presentation of the project's main page. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:29, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikiproject Food and Drink Newsletter - October 2013

 * Delivered by Northamerica1000(talk) 21:04, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Unnecessary comment
Do you have some kind of obsession with me? I left a good faith edit summary, and you should have left it at that. You might want to check the time stamps of the discussion. I was incredibly polite and civil, before the personal attacks and bad faith assumptions began. The other users were incredibly uncivil, so in return I should not be expected to be better. My goal is/was to hold up WP:BLP, not get rid of a precious template to an unreliable source. I really think I went through enough the last two days, if the discussion already ended why are you still bugging me? Heck the discussion almost ended in my favor, because none of the strong keeps (which were incredibly unprofessional, and very sheepish) had any policy backed response, and when it came down to it I refuted the points of everyone I responded to.  STATic  message me!  03:23, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Again, you are mistaken and making yourself look foolish, as you do not know what happened. If you read and check the time stamps you would understand that the "you get what you give" explains why I would be uncivil, since they were incredibly uncivil first. And about the Strong strong strong delete, that person origionally put "delete" but he changed it to strong strong strong delete, due to everyone in the debate being unprofessional and sheepish with their strong keeps that do not make their vote count anymore. You can ask him yourself, or check the edit history, but I was there I know what happened.  STATic  message me!  04:07, 7 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Your the one that messaged me dude, do not be mad because you were wrong.  STATic  message me!  05:14, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prairie Wrestling Alliance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Booker T (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

FamousBirthdays is not a reliable source
Famousbirthdays.com is not a reliable source. See this discussion (WP:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive 153) for more and stop using it as a reference. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:45, 7 December 2013 (UTC)