User talk:QatarStarsLeague/Archive 1

2012 Riyadh truck crash
Ive proposed the abovepage for deletion, you may want to contribute to that discussion. Thanks.Lihaas (talk) 06:15, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "QatarStarsLeague", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it is either promoting, or claiming the authority of, a commercial and sporting entity. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Kevin McE (talk) 19:41, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * 2012 Riyadh truck crash (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Intersection, Flyover and Pylon


 * Guinea-Bissau (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to National People's Assembly


 * Macanese pataca (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Lisboa Hotel

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Sheffield United 2012-13 season GA review
Thanks for taking this on - I know it's a long one - I'm pretty pulled out with work at the moment so happy to do it a bit at a time if that's easier. Bladeboy1889 (talk) 13:18, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Narwhal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fluke (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:07, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Malawi-Mozambique relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Limbe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Legal System of Saudi Arabia
Thanks for your work on this. Just to let you know it's going to be difficult for me to log in for 2 or 3 days, so i probably won't be able to do much on it before Sunday. DeCausa (talk) 14:11, 22 November 2012 (UTC)


 * OK, I'm now up to date on the comments. A couple of the comments I haven't been able to find any sourced material. Take a look and see what you think. DeCausa (talk) 22:42, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Malawi-Mozambique relations
Hello! Your submission of Malawi-Mozambique relations at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 14:33, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
 * There was a response to your question which you have not yet addressed. Please stop by and do so. Thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 04:04, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The nomination has been marked for closure due to the unaddressed issues. I'm sorry it didn't work out. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:15, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

RE: 10th National Congress of the Communist Party of Vietnam
Thans for reviewing the 10th National Congress of the Communist Party of Vietnam.. I've responded to the comments you left on the review page. THanks. --TIAYN (talk) 14:58, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:46, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Aboubacar Camara (footballer born 1993)


A tag has been placed on Aboubacar Camara (footballer born 1993), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:56, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of El Hadji Dieye


The article El Hadji Dieye has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:02, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Emad Al Dhahiri


The article Emad Al Dhahiri has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:02, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2013 WikiCup!
Hello QatarStarsLeague, and welcome to the 2013 WikiCup! Your submissions' page is here. The competition begins at midnight UTC. The first round will last until the end of February, at which point the top 64 scorers will advance to the second round. We will be in touch at the end of every month, and signups are going to remain open until the end of January; if you know of anyone else who may like to take part, please let them know! A few reminders: *The rules can be found here. There have been a few changes from last year, which are listed on that page. *Anything you submit must have been nominated and promoted in 2013, and you need to have completed significant work upon it in 2013. (The articles you review at good article reviews does not need to have been nominated in 2013, but you do need to have started the review in 2013.) We will be checking. *If you feel that another competitor is breaking the rules or abusing the competition in some way, please let a judge know. Please do not remove entries from the submissions' pages of others yourself. *Don't worry about calculating precisely how many points everything is worth. The bot will do that. The bot may occasionally get something wrong- let a judge know, or post on the WikiCup talk page if that happens. *Please try to be prompt in updating submissions' pages so that they can be double-checked. Overall, however, don't worry, and have fun. It doesn't matter if you make the odd mistake; these things happen. Questions can be asked on the WikiCup talk page. Good luck! J Milburn and The ed17 18:12, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

WP:GAN Failed for Abu Dhabi
Just wanted to let you know, I failed the GA nomination for Abu Dhabi. I provided a discussion of why on the GA review that was transcluded on the article's talk page. If you have any questions, I will be glad to further explain my reasons and advise you in preparing it for renomination down the road.--ColonelHenry (talk) 05:38, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2013 WikiCup
Hello, QatarStarsLeague, and welcome to the 2013 WikiCup! Your submissions' page is here. The first round will last until the end of February, at which point the top 64 scorers will advance to the second round. We will be in touch at the end of every month, and signups are going to remain open until the end of January; if you know of anyone else who may like to take part, please let them know! A few reminders:
 * The rules can be found here. There have been a few changes from last year, which are listed on that page.
 * Anything you submit must have been nominated and promoted in 2013, and you need to have completed significant work upon it in 2013. (The articles you review at good article reviews does not need to have been nominated in 2013, but you do need to have started and completed the review in 2013.) We will be checking.
 * If you feel that another competitor is breaking the rules or abusing the competition in some way, please let a judge know. Please do not remove entries from the submissions' pages of others yourself.
 * Don't worry about calculating precisely how many points everything is worth. The bot will do that. The bot may occasionally get something wrong- let a judge know, or post on the WikiCup talk page if that happens.
 * Please try to be prompt in updating submissions' pages so that they can be double-checked.

Overall, however, don't worry, and have fun. It doesn't matter if you make the odd mistake; these things happen. Questions can be asked on the WikiCup talk page. Good luck! J Milburn and The ed17 12:58, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013
Hello, I'm JMHamo. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kieron Dyer, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JMHamo (talk) 05:59, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 January newsletter
Signups are now closed; we have our final 127 contestants for this year's competition. 64 contestants will make it to the next round at the end of February, but we're already seeing strong scoring compared to previous years. currently leads, with 358 points. At this stage in 2012, the leader had 342 points, while in 2011, the leader had 228 points. We also have a large number of scorers when compared with this stage in previous years. was the first competitor to score this year, as he was last year, with a detailed good article review. Some other firsts:
 * was also the first to score for an article, with the good article Hurricane Gordon (2000). Again, this is a repeat of last year!
 * was the first to score for a did you know, with Marquis Flowers.
 * was the first to score for an in the news, with 2013 Houphouët-Boigny stampede.
 * was the first to score for a featured list, with list of Billboard Social 50 number-one artists.
 * was the first to score for a featured picture, with File:Thure de Thulstrup - L. Prang and Co. - Battle of Gettysburg - Restoration by Adam Cuerden.jpg.

Featured articles, portals and topics, as well as good topics, are yet to feature in the competition.

This year, the bonus points system has been reworked, with bonus points on offer for old articles prepared for did you know, and "multiplier" points reworked to become more linear. For details, please see WikiCup/Scoring. There have been some teething problems as the bot has worked its way around the new system, but issues should mostly be ironed out- please report any problems to the WikiCup talk page. Here are some participants worthy of note with regards to the bonus points:


 * was the first to score bonus points, with Portland-class cruiser, a good article.
 * has the highest overall bonus points, as well as the highest scoring article, thanks to his work on Enrico Fermi, now a good article. The biography of such a significant figure to the history of science warrants nearly five times the normal score.
 * claimed bonus points for René Vautier and Nicolas de Fer, articles that did not exist on the English Wikipedia at the start of the year; a first for the WikiCup. The articles were eligible for bonus points because of fact they were both covered on a number of other Wikipedias.

Also, a quick mention of, who may well have already written the oddest article of the WikiCup this year: did you know that the Fucking mayor objected to Fucking Hell on the grounds that there was no Fucking brewery? The gauntlet has been thrown down; can anyone beat it?

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 00:37, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

RE:2000 UEFA Cup Final riots GA
I've done most of what you asked however there is an issue that I couldn't find anything on the London sentences.  The C of E God Save the Queen!  ( talk ) 09:26, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

2010 United Kingdom government formation
Just wanted to say thanks for passing the article. Great to see it at GA. Paul MacDermott (talk) 15:01, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 February newsletter
Round 1 is now over. The top 64 scorers have progressed to round 2, where they have been randomly split into eight pools of eight. At the end of April, the top two from each pool, as well as the 16 highest scorers from those remaining, will progress to round 3. Commiserations to those eliminated; if you're interested in still being involved in the WikiCup, able and willing reviewers will always be needed, and if you're interested in getting involved with other collaborative projects, take a look at the WikiWomen's Month discussed below.

Round 1 saw 21 competitors with over 100 points, which is fantastic; that suggests that this year's competition is going to be highly competative. Our lower scores indicate this, too: A score of 19 was required to reach round 2, which was significantly higher than the 11 points required in 2012 and 8 points required in 2011. The score needed to reach round 3 will be higher, and may depend on pool groupings. In 2011, 41 points secured a round 3 place, while in 2012, 65 was needed. Our top three scorers in round 1 were:
 * , primarily for an array of warship GAs.
 * , primarily for an array of did you knows and good articles, some of which were awarded bonus points.
 * , due in no small part to Canis Minor, a featured article awarded a total of 340 points. A joint submission with, this is the highest scoring single article yet submitted in this year's competition.

Other contributors of note include:
 * , whose Portal:Massachusetts is the first featured portal this year. The featured portal process is one of the less well-known featured processes, and featured portals have traditionally had little impact on WikiCup scores.
 * , whose Mycena aurantiomarginata was the first featured article this year.
 * and, who both claimed points for articles in the Major League Baseball tie-breakers topic, the first topic points in the competition.
 * , who claimed for the first full good topic with the Casting Crowns studio albums topic.

Featured topics have still played no part in this year's competition, but once again, a curious contribution has been offered by : did you know that there is a Shit Brook in Shropshire? With April Fools' Day during the next round, there will probably be a good chance of more unusual articles...

March sees the WikiWomen's History Month, a series of collaborative efforts to aid the women's history WikiProject to coincide with Women's History Month and International Women's Day. A number of WikiCup participants have already started to take part. The project has a to-do list of articles needing work on the topic of women's history. Those interested in helping out with the project can find articles in need of attention there, or, alternatively, add articles to the list. Those interested in collaborating on articles on women's history are also welcome to use the WikiCup talk page to find others willing to lend a helping hand. Another collaboration currently running is an an effort from WikiCup participants to coordinate a number of Easter-themed did you know articles. Contributions are welcome!

A few final administrative issues. From now on, submission pages will need only a link to the article and a link to the nomination page, or, in the case of good article reviews, a link to the review only. See your submissions' page for details. This will hopefully make updating submission pages a little less tedious. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) J Milburn (talk) 11:38, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 March newsletter
We are halfway through round two. Pool A sees the strongest competition, with five out of eight of its competitors scoring over 100, and Pool H is lagging, with half of its competitors yet to score. WikiCup veterans lead overall; Pool A's (2010's winner) leads overall, with poolmate  (a finalist in 2011 and 2012) not far behind. Pool F's (a finalist in 2010, 2011 and 2012) is in third. The top two scorers in each pool, as well as the next highest 16 scorers overall, will progress to round three at the end of April.

Today has seen a number of Easter-themed did you knows from WikiCup participants, and March has seen collaboration from contestants with WikiWomen's History Month. It's great to see the WikiCup being used as a locus of collaboration; if you know of any collaborative efforts going on, or want to start anything up, please feel free to use the WikiCup talk page to help find interested editors. As well as fostering collaboration, we're also seeing the Cup encouraging the improvement of high-importance articles through the bonus point system. Highlights from the last month include GAs on physicist Niels Bohr, on the European hare , on the constellation Circinus ( and ) and on the Third Epistle of John. All of these subjects were covered on at least 50 Wikipedias at the beginning of the year and, subsequently, each contribution was awarded at least three times as many points as normal.

Wikipedians who enjoy friendly competition may be interested in participating in April's wikification drive. While wikifying an article is typically not considered "significant work" such that it can be claimed for WikiCup points, such gnomish work is often invaluable in keeping articles in shape, and is typically very helpful for new writers who may not be familiar with formatting norms.

A quick reminder: now, submission pages will need only a link to the article and a link to the nomination page, or, in the case of good article reviews, a link to the review only. See your submissions' page for details. This will hopefully make updating submission pages a little less tedious. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) J Milburn (talk) 22:31, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Talon (roller coaster) GAN
I have addressed all your comments on the review page.-- Dom497 ( talk ) 20:15, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Chile-Indonesia relations (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Pulp


 * Istiqlal Mosque (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Merdeka Square

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:07, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Mr T (Talk?)  [ (New thread?) ] 05:29, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Ways to improve Chile-Indonesia relations
Hi, I'm Mrt3366. QatarStarsLeague, thanks for creating Chile-Indonesia relations!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Do something about the references in the article :) cheers

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Mr T (Talk?)  [ (New thread?) ] 05:49, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for creating Chile-Indonesia relations, good job..! Gunkarta (talk) 15:03, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Masjid Istiqlal possible Good Article nomination
IMHO I think the Istiqlal Mosque article has covered most of important facts and data. I think it is ready for nominations, but maybe we should ask other editors for suggestions, help, assistance etc. Great job...

Chicken Satay for you... Cheers... Gunkarta (talk) 15:02, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
 TheStrike  Σagle   15:48, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

A well-meaning suggestion regarding Good articles review
Although  do not have to be of the same standard as the featured articles, the quality expectation from GAs are fairly high. Importantly, the GA criteria are a standard, not the opinion of individual reviewers. This comment is intended to help you make the decisions (while reviewing Good article nominees) based on whether an article meets the criteria or not, rather than personal preferences. Good article processes are designed to assess the quality of the article's content. These criteria are: Here, here you are apparently reviewing the article section-wise, which is not a bad thing per se, but I don't see you talk about the main criteria. Mr T (Talk?)  [ (New thread?) ] 08:00, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Clear and concise structure
 * 2) Factual accuracy and verifiability
 * 3) Wideness of the coverage
 * 4) Neutrality
 * 5) Stability
 * 6) Appropriate illustration
 * I will keep this in mind. Thanks! QatarStarsLeague (talk) 13:51, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ICGV Þór, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Salvage and Halifax (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:28, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 April newsletter
We are a week into Round 3, but it is off to a flying start, with claiming for the high-importance Portal:Sports and Portal:Geography (which are the first portals ever awarded bonus points in the WikiCup) and  claiming for a did you know of sea, the highest scoring individual did you know article ever submitted for the WikiCup. Round 2 saw very impressive scores at close; first place and second place  both scored over 1000 points; a feat not seen in Round 2 since 2010. This, in part, has been made possible by the change in the bonus points rules, but is also testament to the quality of the competition this year. Pool C and Pool G were most competitive, with three quarters of participants making it to Round 3, while Pool D was the least, with only the top two scorers making it through. The lowest qualifying score was 123, significantly higher than last year's 65, 2011's 41 or even 2010's 100.

The next issue of The Signpost is due to include a brief update on the current WikiCup, comparing it to previous years' competitions. This may be of interest to current WikiCup followers, and may help bring some more new faces into the community. We would also like to note that this round includes an extra competitor to the 32 advertised, who has been added to a random pool. This extra inclusion seems to have been the fairest way to deal with a small mistake made before the beginning of this round, but should not affect the competition in a large way. If you have any questions or concerns about this, please feel free to contact one of the judges.

A rules clarification: content promoted between rounds can be claimed in the round after the break, but not the round before. The case in point is content promoted on 29/30 April, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 15:55, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Portuguese Empire Article
In response to your post on my talk page, I am all for a collaboration. I'm enamored with practically any facet of the Early Modern Period on a global scale(c.1500-1789) myself. I will be done with my school exams by Thursday, and would love to get started on an Wikipedia article that I haven't finished from last year (the Portuguese Empire was among them) as soon as Friday, if not Monday of next week. I've not been able to read much on the Portuguese and Spanish Empires since January, but I do own a book on Portugal's colonial empire, and have several journal articles (JSTOR, etc.) and online excerpts from Google Books on the Portuguese Empire (especially from the late 16th century onwards). I've been meaning to finish finding more sources, but I can get started on that on the weekend. Let me know if you get in contact with more people. There needs to be more articles on European colonization and the impacts of it with GA and FA status! LeftAire (talk) 03:34, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Although much progress has been made since it was first nominated, I'm not quite sure that it's ready for that nomination yet. There needs to be more information for the Portuguese Empire in the colonization of Africa period (1822-1951) and the Turmoil and Decolonization period. There also needs to be some condensing with the Southeast Asia and Spice trade. Not necessarily with the information (although the multiple Sieges of Diu need to conform with Portuguese hegemony), but there aren't complete thoughts like the majority of the other sections. If you can find some sources for the citations that haven't been sourced, that would one step closer to getting that GA nomination! I also suggest looking at the Portuguese version of the page for an inspiration of how the page could be better ordered. It's okay if you can't read Portuguese (I can only understand a few words myself), but how the different parts of the Portuguese Empire (Americas, Africa, South Asia, and Southeast Asia) is something that could be used for the English page. Just a few suggestions. Thanks for reading! LeftAire (talk) 14:29, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

re Irish Expedition to Scotland
hi QatarStarsLeague thanks for the suggestions. I will improve that article when I have time. It's the first article I posted so that's why it's not great. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephen Blackpool (talk • contribs) 07:06, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Citation coding
Hi, I had seen your GA nomination of Isteqlal mosque, I want to start coding the citations hope it will help. Regards :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 08:16, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Re: barnstar
Hi! Thanks for the barnstar, that's very kind of you. I trust we'll be wrapping the GAR up soon. There's still the ICGV Óðinn issue to be resolved, and that's it.--Tomobe03 (talk) 20:58, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Istiqlal mosque GA review
Hi, thanks for your invitation to coordinate in GA review, What he remarked is correct, and we need to chop lot of original research work and apply RS's. If you don't mind i want to proceed to re-structure the section "structure", in which we will have to remove lot of date and make it simple. Infact i am unable to find the sources which resembles the Islamic values in the mosque architecture, So my advice is to remove that and make it simple. Any way the GA review is closed by the reviewer, but I had put him a request on his talk page to restart, lets see what he will decide. Regards :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 07:05, 18 May 2013 (UTC)


 * I had posted a draft for the section "Structure" at article talk page, please go through it and reply there about your views and required c/e. Hope you are aware that the more longer the section, it will invite more queries, so initially we should choose to move with light and simple text. Regards :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 09:38, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited An Qiyuan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Han and An (surname) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:14, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Accelink Technologies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Attenuator (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Shivalik
Thanks a ton QSL for taking up the GAN of INS Shivalik. Unfortunately, both my desktop and laptop have gone wild leaving me no internet access...I will try mu best to solve the issues if I get Internet again..else, please close the nom as 'fail after one week...I'mn typing this practically without a monitor so please dont mind any spelling mitakes....please reply in my taLK OR email..   Strike   Σagle    14:50, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I am sorry to hear that. I shall do so. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 20:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * All issues clarified....surprisingly.. :D    Strike   Σagle    03:24, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Air Madagascar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mananjary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:43, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Destination lists at airline articles
I have reverted the following edits:, , , ,. There's no need to have the same information included in two different articles.--Jetstreamer Talk 14:49, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

FK Partizan Good Article Reassessment
FK Partizan, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. C 679 08:42, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Agreement on Friendship and Cooperation between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia
Can you take another look at the GA review of Agreement on Friendship and Cooperation between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia? -- ◅ PRODUCER  ( TALK ) 05:56, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Hu Zhengyan GA
Hi QSL. Not that I'm impatient or anything... but I note that you haven't promoted the article, and I was wondering if my reply to your query was unsatisfactory. Is there anything more that needs doing? Thanks, Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  07:36, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Awesome, thanks. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  06:51, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

10 Marshals project
That is a very ambitious goal, and I wish you good luck with it. I want to remind you that your table on the front page is missing He Long.

I rewrote and sourced most of Lin Biao's article last year, expanding it to its present size. I would have nominated it for GA status at that time, but there were a few unsourced paragraphs present before my work that I thought were true, but which I could not find sources for, and so I thought the nomination would fail for being insufficiently supported by inline citations. What I most lacked were sources on his military activities between about 1939-1949. Can you help to find sources for this period of Lin's life?Ferox Seneca (talk) 03:48, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre
{||}

WT:GAN
Hi there. Wanted to let you know that I opened a thread at WT:GAN regarding your GA-reviews. Mentoz86 (talk) 20:34, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Karamokho Alfa
I am not sure if this would qualify for GA. There are a lot of gaps. This is all I could find online in English and French. There probably is more in books and scholarly articles. But I suspect the amount of solid information is very limited, and the main primary sources are verbal traditions. I have no objection to trying if you think it has a chance. Aymatth2 (talk) 11:53, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I have no idea how many sources are available offline that would give additional information. During this period, Europeans only knew about the Imamate of Futa Jallon from second-hand reports that reached them in their coastal factories.  There may be some Arabic sources, but it could be that this is almost all that can be said. I do not have access to a good library, so don't think I can add much more. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:54, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I suppose many articles could be brought up to GA quality. I do not have the energy. I generally pick obscure subjects and aim for a reasonable basic introduction, not an exhaustive treatment. People who want more detail would be unlikely to trust a Wikipedia article. Aymatth2 (talk) 15:20, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

ITN for Shenzhou 10
-- Spencer T♦ C 02:57, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Images now fixed, thanks for spotting that. Upload in haste, repent at leisure... Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  08:55, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  21:53, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks
That makes two of my articles you've GA'd in the last couple of weeks. Thank you for the reviews, much appreciated! Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  22:37, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Krake GAN
I have left replies on the review page.-- Dom497 ( talk ) 18:44, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Lin Bao
Hi, please attend to the review. As it is now the article is of unsatisfactory quality, and I am considering quickfailing it.  ★ ★ RetroLord★ ★  08:07, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

TFA/r
Hi there, I did this. Hope you don't have an issue with it. Daniel (talk) 11:06, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Italian battleship Regina Margherita
Hi, QatarStarsLeague. I hate to be a pest, but I was wondering if you forgot to update the GAN banner on the talk page for this article? Thanks for reviewing the article, by the way. Parsecboy (talk) 17:11, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Ignacy Potocki/GA1
I hope all issues are addressed now. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 17:16, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 June newsletter
We are down to our final 16: the 2013 semi-finals are upon us. A score of 321 was required to survive round 3, further cementing this as the most competitive WikiCup yet; round 3 was survived in 2012 with 243 points, in 2011 with 76 points and in 2010 with 250 points. The change may in part be to do with the fact that more articles are now awarded bonus points, in addition to more competitive play. Reaching the final has, in the past, required 573 points (2012, a 135% increase on the score needed to reach round 4), 150 points (2011, a 97% increase) and 417 points (2010, a 72% increase). This round has seen over a third of participants claiming points for featured articles (with seven users claiming for multiple featured articles) and most users have also gained bonus points. However, the majority of points continue to come from good articles, followed by did you know articles. In this round, every content type was utilised by at least one user, proving that the WikiCup brings together content contributors from all corners of the project.

Round 3 saw a number of contributions of note. claimed the first featured topic points in this year's competition for her excellent work on topics related to Maya Angelou, the noted American author and poet. We have also continued to see high-importance articles improved as part of the competition: was awarded a thoroughly well-earned 560 points for her featured article Middle Ages and 102 points for her good article Battle of Hastings. Good articles James Chadwick and Stanislaw Ulam netted 102 and 72 points respectively, while 72 points were awarded to  for each of Władysław Sikorski and Emilia Plater, both recently promoted to good article status. Collaborative efforts between WikiCup participants have continued, with, for example, and  being awarded 180 points each for their featured article on Boletus luridus.

A rules reminder: content promoted between rounds can be claimed in the round after the break, but not the round before. The case in point is content promoted on the 29/30 June, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. We are currently seeing concern about the amount of time people have to wait for reviews, especially at GAC- if you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 10:03, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited El Gezira Tower Movenpick Hotel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Movenpick (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Paris
Hi, I can't locate the book on the Paris Green Guide in the bibliography this. Can you find the author etc? I need it to source a lot of the art section I've written.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  21:48, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

GA Review Request
It seems that you love to review articles that are part of Operation B&M (Thanks for that!) so I was wondering if you would be willing to review the Patriot (Worlds of Fun) article. :) -- Dom497 ( talk ) 22:44, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
 * In time for American Independence Day? Sure. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 22:47, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for the GA review! I apologize for not responding sooner. I was gone for the weekend, but I'm glad the article passed. Regards,--Taiping Tulip (talk) 03:53, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Dieppe, Seine-Maritime
In my opinion this page should be at Dieppe and the others moved to Dieppe (disambiguation). As far as I'm concerned the Dieppe is the one in northern France. I'm going to request a move.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  14:12, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Yes, as you've worked on French articles like Paris. I'll ask one or two who've edited it first and if I don't get a response within three days I'l request a move. ♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  14:32, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Possibly yes, Rouen and Marseilles in particular I think should be of GA quality, although List of communes in France with over 20,000 inhabitants (2006 census) places cities like Toulouse and Lyon far higher than Dieppe or Rouen. Right now though I'm beginning an expansion of Badajoz, a dark and mysterious city. Let's work on Paris gradually and peer review it in a week or two for some feedback on what needs to be done. I'll leave the cityscape for now but if we are to prepare for FA I'd favour a significant condense and provide more information on some of the landmarks and mention less landmarks. ♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  14:36, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Badajoz? Source the existing first and then translate some of it from Spanish and source that and then add to it further. The Moorish fortress looks fascinating to me, it's in a part of Spain I know very little about. I'd be happy to work with you on getting any other French city of your choice up to GA, you're welcome of course to help with Badajoz but I'm sure you;d rather work on French topics more. Do you like in Doha by any chance? I did some work on Qatar a while back I think and started some settlements in Oman in my old stubbing days. I bet it's 50 odd degrees over there at the moment!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  14:58, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

What wiki skin and what browser do you use? If you go into my preference click appearance and click Custom javascript on whatever skin you use copy and paste the following, you'll have to click edit in this page and copy the text from the editing this page rather than directly. This'll add a web cite option to your tool bar which if you click it'll draw up the empty citation for you to fill in.

/** * Extra buttons in toolbar * @stats */ jQuery.getScript('//meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Krinkle/Scripts/InsertWikiEditorButton.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript', function {        // Reflist        krInsertWikiEditorButton({ "id": "mw-customeditbutton-myspecialbutton", "icon": "CW", "label": "CW", "insertBefore": ". \n\n", }); });

Opened a request at Talk:Dieppe for moving♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  17:10, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Here's a google ref maker tool, just paste in the url. Remove the page number, the accessdate and tag name and simply add ref=harv at the end for using the sfn notes. If you want links directly to google books and google book ref maker in your itinery next to "wikilove" let me know and I'll give you the coding.

Better, can you fill in the publisher= parameters though? ♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  21:57, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Badajoz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Orange, Laurel, Santarém, Nazaré and Myrtle

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Villa Regina
Hello. I'm AmericanLemming. I see that you recently reviewed and failed the Villa Regina GAN. After it was failed, I finished my copy-edit of the article and then left a detailed list of suggested improvements on the article talk page. Anyway, seeing as you reviewed the article, I would greatly appreciate any further suggestions for improvement, prose or otherwise, which you could add to my list.

You probably will find my list to be fairly comprehensive, but I am still open to any other advice you have, especially with regards to the prose, seeing as I copy-edited the article. Thanks! AmericanLemming (talk) 17:52, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Burj Qatar
Will finish off Badajoz and nom within the next few days. You might be interested in expanding this article.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  13:40, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wang Changshun, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of Science and Technology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

TFAR
Thanks for a suggestion on WP:TFAR. Can you please also update the Summary chart there, with one support, yours? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:42, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I fixed the link within the page ;) - Did you tell the author that you suggested it? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:33, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Re: Sinlaku
Hey there! So, I personally don't think Sinlaku is that worthy, namely because the meteorological history is a little on the short side, and half of the impact section relies on news sources that no one without Lexis Nexis can read. Plus, I haven't done a thorough search of Chinese sources, so there might be more info out there. I'm just curious why you would pick Sinlaku? It would be the 11 year anniversary, which isn't anything special. If anything, an 80 year anniversary, or 15 year anniversary is a bit more impressive. Even a 10 year anniversary for something that's already a featured article wouldn't be that bad. But, overall, there are enough featured hurricane articles. I'm not too worried about getting another hurricane article to TFA. I don't mind my own articles being taken to FAC, so long as someone else does the research to finish it properly. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 00:52, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * (Fellow project editor comment) I am not the author of this, and neither is Hink, but Typhoon Gay (1989) could work for an "Asian tropical storm" TFA though granted, that's already featured. YE Pacific  Hurricane 01:26, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Also, Typhoon Pongsona is already featured, but not yet a TFA. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 03:20, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Anir1uph &#124; talk &#124; contrib 00:13, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Wang Changshun
Hello! Your submission of Wang Changshun at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ {T/C} 10:39, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello!
Is the review at Talk:Kolkata-class destroyer/GA1 still on? Thanks! Anir1uph &#124; talk &#124; contrib 15:00, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Badajoz
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:04, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Yes, let's hope editors from 2005 don't turn up to complain about the improvements on this one too! :-]♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  13:30, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alessandro Del Piero, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Uliveto (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Logo of PetroChina
Hello! Your submission of Logo of PetroChina at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! FoxyOrange (talk) 11:15, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 July newsletter
We're halfway through this year's penultimate round, and the competition is moving along well. Pool A's currently leads overall, while Pool B's  is second. Both leaders are WikiCup veterans, and both have already scored over 600 points this month. If the round were to end today,, with 274 points, would be the lowest-scoring participant to make it through. This indicates that participants will need a score comparable to last year's (573, the highest ever) to qualify for the final. The high scores this year are a testament both to the quality of participants and to the increased focus on significant content (eligible for bonus points) in this year's competition. So far this round, both Sasata and have made up over half of their score through bonus points, with, for example, high importance FA koala earning Sasata a total of 440 points (from a multiplier of 4.4) and high-importance GA sea earning Cwmhiraeth a total of 216 points (from a multiplier of 7.2). Other articles on important topics submitted this round include a featured article on the Norman conquest of England by, and good articles on Nobel laureate in literature Henryk Sienkiewicz, Nobel laureate in physics Hans Bethe, and the noted Japanese aircraft carrier Hiryū. These articles are by, and Sturmvogel_66 respectively.

Other than that, there is not much to report! If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 23:29, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Serbian diacritic moves
Just a friendly notice before someone else does:

It is not a good idea to move articles while an official move discussion is underway. I recommend you'd be prepared to moves them back yourself if someone complains. That said, I doubt someone will in this obvious case, just keep in mind that normaly such discussions run for about a week and are closed by an admin or an experienced user after that. Agathoclea (talk) 18:20, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't think any harm has been done. Please read Requested moves about that particular procedure and Moving a page about the general background. Happy editing -- Agathoclea (talk) 18:28, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages
 * If you have any questions, you can ask Ocaasi anytime. --17:58, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Badajoz
Badajoz passed GA, feel free to add it to your user page. Still interested in Rouen?♦ Dr. Blofeld  21:52, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Can you review Gregorian_Tower for me? I believe it has an adequate coverage for GA given the sources available.♦ Dr. Blofeld  20:39, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Cheers. One place I was considering getting up to GA was Aalborg, but might be a while before I get around to it.♦ Dr. Blofeld  08:35, 16 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Aalborg would be an interesting project. Just message me when you begin Rouen. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 13:17, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the review. One thing though, if you nom any of our articles like Palacio Municipal de Caracas, can you let us know?♦ Dr. Blofeld  21:39, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi!
Extended means? Could you describe what you were mean to say?— Prashant 03:40, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
 * See your talk page. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 13:56, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Ip Man (film) GA Review
Hi again I think covered everything in your review please let me know if anything else needs to be done. Thanks Kelvin 101 (talk) 17:46, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Ip Man GA
Thanks for completing the GA assessment, I have nominated the 2nd movie for a good article also, hopefully we will get to work together again. thanks Kelvin 101 (talk) 17:57, 19 August 2013 (UTC)