User talk:CambridgeBayWeather/Archive49

Huh?
As is well known, I think Trump's an idiot and his policies an affront to decency and common sense, but how in the world do you come up with delete (or, indeed, anything else) as the outcome to WP:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Broter/Ban_on_Muslim_immigration? While we're not supposed to call other editors assholes, if they want to advertise themselves as assholes, I really don't see why we should be stopping them.  E Eng  14:39, 29 May 2017 (UTC) The close doesn't seem improper to me. It merely demonstrated that consensus is about strength of arguments, not numbers. So much for my "level head"! &#8213; Mandruss  &#9742;  18:28, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Ping.  E Eng  18:01, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * . I'm sorry I thought you were pissed off at me and that this was a rhetorical question. I think that policy allowed for the deletion. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:20, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I wasn't angry at you; when I'm angry at you you'll know it. I was, however, annoyed at what I consider (and, as you saw in the ensuing discussion, just about everyone else considers) your overanxious interpretation of BLP. Anyway, all of that happened after I left my OP here.
 * You say "policy allowed for deletion"; that's just another way of saying "I decided it should be deleted" without really explaining anything. Since when do we delete userboxes that express run-of-the-mill political beliefs, even ones we (as individual editors) might consider foolish or even offensive? We certainly don't delete userboxes that express things like "I believe in protecting the rights of immigrants" or something like that. I really want to know how policy calls for one to be deleted and the other left to remain. Certainly nothing explaining that was offered in the deletion debate, which brings me back to the question of how you could have arrived at the close you made. Seems to me that at best it's no consensus.  E Eng  16:50, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * It was covered in Userboxes. And if you want to MfD any userbox, including the ones on my talk page, I will certainly give proper consideration. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:18, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I have no interest in having any of your userboxes deleted, not that I've looked at them. You are applying the same overbroad interpretation that earned you such criticism in the other matter on which our paths recently crossed (see User_talk:EEng). User pages, and userboxes in particular, have always been allowed more latitude in the expression of social and political views than would be acceptable elsewhere in the project, and by applying this interpretation you're simply going to alienate a succession of editors for no good reason. Pinging a couple of level heads who may be able to explain this to you better than I've been able to:, , .  E  Eng  18:02, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The existence of bad stuff does not justify the retention of other bad stuff, and we can't fix everything at the same time; that's part of the idea behind WP:OSE. Had I known of the MfD discussion I would have !voted Delete per Userboxes bullet 3: "Userboxes must not be inflammatory or divisive." (emphasis theirs). If I became aware of an MfD for a userbox on the other side of the same inflammatory and divisive issue, I would likewise !vote Delete there. What's inflammatory and divisive is necessarily a judgment call, but this case seems clear enough; you don't get much more inflammatory and divisive than this issue.
 * The existence of bad stuff does not justify the retention of other bad stuff, and we can't fix everything at the same time; that's part of the idea behind WP:OSE. Had I known of the MfD discussion I would have !voted Delete per Userboxes bullet 3: "Userboxes must not be inflammatory or divisive." (emphasis theirs). If I became aware of an MfD for a userbox on the other side of the same inflammatory and divisive issue, I would likewise !vote Delete there. What's inflammatory and divisive is necessarily a judgment call, but this case seems clear enough; you don't get much more inflammatory and divisive than this issue.
 * Perhaps I should have said blockhead? But your opinion is valued anyway. Now, what about the userbox here: "In support of the Karen National Union and their ongoing struggle against genocide." Is that OK because fighting genocide is a "good thing", while a Muslim ban is a "bad thing" (and you know how I actually feel about that fool Trump and his policies). Pinging, since I'm dragging his userbox in, it being the most saintly one I could think of.  E Eng  19:30, 9 June 2017 (UTC) And no, calling Trump a fool in this discussion is not a BLP violation.)


 * Fixing your ping to . And no I didn't see that remark as a BLP as you were expressing your opinion. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:38, 9 June 2017 (UTC)


 * If I became aware of an MfD for that one, I would probably !vote Keep because it is not sufficiently inflammatory or divisive to be deleted. Karen National Union is not a frequent topic on the home page of The New York Times, and I would include it on the long list of things that I'm too busy to care about. But I don't care to get any deeper into hypotheticals. &#8213; Mandruss  &#9742;  19:47, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, I'm going to push the point just a bit more. Certainly this is in the headlines:


 * OK? Not OK?  E Eng  19:55, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm responding to the ping. It's difficult for me to give a clear opinion, because I cannot see the now-deleted userbox for myself. I've always found CambridgeBayWeather to be a reasonable and clueful colleague. I've read the MfD, and I would probably have relisted it for further discussion instead of making a decision one way or the other, but that's me. I think that the example about Palestine that EEng put here is perfectly fine, and I would feel very negatively about any proposal to delete it. Speaking in general (and of course the devil is in the details), I tend to believe that editors should be given wide berth on what userboxes they have on their own userpages, except that this should not go so far as to permit anything that is intended to insult or defame other users or non-public eye non-editors. Expressions of political opinion, if volunteered freely, should be permitted. --Tryptofish (talk) 23:43, 9 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks for taking the trouble, and I think you see my concern. The userbox being discussed in the MfD linked in my OP here said (from memory): "This editor supports a ban on Muslim immigration".  E Eng  23:57, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Oh, bleep. My gut reaction is a very strong WP:IDONTLIKEIT, so I'm having to check my gut reaction. It steps right up to the line of what I described as insulting others. But no, we should not censor that. I think a useful test is what we would do if it said, instead, this editor opposes such a ban. Of course, that's technically a violation of the rule that boxes should support instead of oppose things, but I would make an exception given the context. I doubt anyone would have brought that one to MfD, and we should not try to have it both ways. --Tryptofish (talk) 00:04, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Protection removal request for Tekmill
Hi CambridgeBayWeather, I noticed that Tekmill was create protected by you on 1st December 2016. I'm requesting you to kindly remove the protection as I want to create a page for him. He is a notable artist and since December 2016, has received several coverage articles in Turkish media. Some of the publishers covering him are Olay newspaper, Londra newspaper and Avrupa newspaper. I can provide you the hard copies upon request. Thank you, Tekmillion (talk) 21:12, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * . A better idea would be to create Draft:Tekmill and see if that passes. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:52, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Vancouver (Vancouver Film Studios) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Vancouver (Vancouver Film Studios). Since you had some involvement with the Vancouver (Vancouver Film Studios) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:09, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2017).

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Doug Bell • Dennis Brown • Clpo13 • ONUnicorn
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg ThaddeusB • Yandman • Bjarki S • OldakQuill • Shyam • Jondel • Worm That Turned

Guideline and policy news
 * An RfC proposing an off-wiki LTA database has been closed. The proposal was broadly supported, with further discussion required regarding what to do with the existing LTA database and defining access requirements. Such a tool/database formed part of the Community health initiative's successful grant proposal.
 * Some clarifications have been made to the community banning and unblocking policies that effectively sync them with current practice. Specifically, the community has reached a consensus that when blocking a user at WP:AN or WP:ANI, it is considered a "community sanction", and administrators cannot unblock unilaterally if the user has not successfully appealed the sanction to the community.
 * An RfC regarding the bot policy has closed with changes to the section describing restrictions on cosmetic changes.

Technical news
 * Users will soon be able to blacklist specific users from sending them notifications.

Miscellaneous
 * Following the 2017 elections, the new members of the Board of Trustees include Raystorm, Pundit and Doc James. They will serve three-year terms.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:40, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Renew your protection
Please renew protection at Ravana.VictoriaGraysonTalk 20:51, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Gave it pending changes for a month. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:45, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Vivid Entertainment
Before you put protection on the article entitled Vivid Entertainment for alleged edit warring, did you read the talk section concerning the portion of the article that Hullaballoo Wolfowitz keeps removing? He cites a different reason each time he vandalizes the segment regarding historical Vivid Girls, and refuses to engage in constructive discussion, actually ANY discussion. First he cited the segment as unsourced, but the segment was clearly well sourced. Then he claimed it was publicity. Then he claimed it was merely a laundry list. Wikipedia has so many instances of lists of historical persons. He has NEVER claimed the information re "Vivid Girls" was inaccurate or irrelevant. He is just personally opposed to having the information in the article. Furthermore, I have NEVER seen any editor have so many complaints against him, all of which he and you administrators IGNORE. He is one of the reasons I would never contribute any money to Wikipedia. Anonymous editors without any formal knowledge of the subject and editing ruin so many good articles. I thought you would at least review and contact the parties, but instead you just protected the article without good cause. Under what authority did YOU protect the article? 2601:989:4200:BAA2:5912:EBF7:708A:C30A (talk) 05:37, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pizza Pockets box.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Pizza Pockets box.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Protection of Malcolm Nance
Thank you for the protection of Malcolm Nance.

But now I can't edit the page to improve it.

What we have here is not a content dispute, but a few editors violating WP:BLP, against consensus, to engage in disruptive editing.

There's gotta be a better way to deal with that than full-protecting the page.

Maybe you could add

to the talk page?

And could you also add it to Template:Editnotices/Page/Malcolm Nance, as can be seen for example, at Template:Editnotices/Page/Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections ?

Sagecandor (talk) 23:53, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * That sounds like a better idea. Done. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:45, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Can you keep an eye on the page for WP:BLP violations? Sagecandor (talk) 15:42, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem when I manage to remember. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:18, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Unfortunately, I am being subject to WP:WIKIHOUNDING, per comment by admin about the nominator at Articles for deletion/Defeating ISIS. Sagecandor (talk) 16:20, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Red (Taylor Swift album)
Can you semi-protect the page that who ignored against Template:Infobox_album. 123.136.112.56 (talk) 10:42, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Go to the talk page for that article. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:52, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Protection of Currensy (hip-hop artist)
Can you please remove the "Move=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access" protection from Currensy (hip-hop artist)? It is not needed at all. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 14:48, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
 * can you start a discussion on the talk page. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:20, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Battle_of_Raqqa_(2017)
Maybe it's better to protect this again, it's ITN but there ain't that many editors on it. I reverted an IP that already got thrue with changing the casualty numbers. 80.132.88.220 (talk) 15:45, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I've gone with 1 month pending changes for now. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:28, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Unidentified file
Greetings! A user here has been adding an original research caption to a skull, whose file source does not specify the ethnicity/clan or place of exhumation of the cranium. It just indicates in the original Hausa that it is kasusuwan mutum, which translates as "the bones of a man". The file was just renamed accordingly for that reason. Can you please therefore remove this unidentified file? Kind Regards-- Soupforone (talk) 15:35, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Someone reverted already. I have warned the user about OR and opened a section on the article talk page. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:18, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The place of exhumation is Berbera, Somaliland as mentioned in source "The research team of science have used the shovel to evacuate the tomb and buried many people in the town of Barbera in Somaliland.", as for the ethnicity/clan it clearly states they were Isaaq "But these people are ethnic Isaaq." Your edit warring and labelling as 'unidentified skull' was unwarranted, and your request for removal of categories and replacement with 'fossils' is particularly disruptive . --Kzl55 (talk) 16:59, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Requesting unprotection of Cricket World Cup
Hello CambridgeBayWeather, hope you are doing well. As you were the last admin to protect Cricket World Cup, hence I would like to request you to please remove the indefinite move protection of the article from sysop to none because this protection was applied several years ago and is no longer required and necessary. Thank you. TheGeneralUser (talk) 18:38, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I recommend against removing it, since I can see no legitimate reason why anyone should be able to move it without going through "requested moves". - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 18:51, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Hello Thomas, protection is applied to any page to stop disruption to it. In this case, there is no such disruption and hence it is not required. TheGeneralUser (talk) 18:56, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I know why pages are protected, unlike you I also know that there are users who love to move cricket pages, and add ICC in front of the name, even though the common name is, and always has been, just "Cricket World Cup" (with Special:Contributions/MOTORAL1987 being one). So the only reason Cricket World Cup still has the name that is in common use, is that editors can't move it... - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 20:07, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I do agree with your reasoning, but consensus can change and every page can't be move protected in the same way. Protection should not be an endorsement for a current name or page version. TheGeneralUser (talk) 20:24, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * As far as I can tell all of the many page moves that have taken place over the past few days, all adding ICC in front of the name, have been undiscussed moves, the kind of moves that move protection is intended to protect against... - Tom &#124; Thomas.W talk 20:33, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * {{u|TheGeneralUser}] as says WP:Requested moves would have been good place to start. You could have also asked  who was the original protecting admin and still active. Until they express an opinion I will not change it. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:56, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:06, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the ping CambridgeBayWeather. Sorry for the slow reply, it's a while since I logged in. On the whole indefinite protection of any kind should be used sparingly, and I admit if a new user hadn't recently renamed a few articles without discussion I'd be more inclined to remove the protection. However, at the moment my feeling is that move protection is appropriate as the page gets a lot of traffic (getting between 40,000 and 90,000 readers a month in what might be considered the off-season) and it means that anyone who wants to move it has to go through the requested moves process and gain consensus. Nev1 (talk) 10:58, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * . Thanks. That was my felling as well. I'll leave it and if the user starts a discussion and consensus is to move then that's different. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:08, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Code Elektro
Thanks for that. I proded it, but the creator removed it and I didn't feel like risking an edit war. (talk page stalker) Crash Under ride  10:04, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * . I noticed it at work and realised it looked to be a copyvio but because of the slow service we have couldn't follow up until late last night. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:49, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Request that you vacate wrongful block
Hi there. A while back you blocked me for allegedly using a sockpuppet. I don't know what the basis for your mistaken assumption was, but I have never used another account nor edited while logged out. Thus I request you vacate the block, clean out my block log appropriately, and post an apology on my talk page. Thanks. Fact checker _ at your service 23:51, 28 June 2017 (UTC)


 * First things first, though. Before you vacate the block and post the apology, I would appreciate if you could point me to anything anywhere on Wikipedia that would explain what actions you took and why. I don't see a link to any discussion and as a matter of fact it appears nobody ever notified me any discussion was taking place.  Seems like a rancid abuse of process.  Fact checker _ at your service  23:53, 28 June 2017 (UTC)


 * . I am not sure what you mean by "vacate the block". I can't clean a block log. And what would I apologise for? Also see Sockpuppet investigations/Factchecker atyourservice/Archive. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:25, 29 June 2017 (UTC)


 * What would you apologize for? How about blocking me for somebody else's tomfoolery based on laughable premises?  Fact checker _ at your service  23:14, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't think so. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:58, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Slim Jxmmi
Hi,

Noticed you reversed the changes on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slim_Jxmmi. You may be unfamiliar but Slim Jxmmi is one half of Rae Sremmurd and brother of Swae Lee. He is one of the most popular rap group out right now and is responsible for the 2016 smash hit 'Black Beatles'. Further, he will be releasing a solo album in the upcoming months. Please do not remove the page again.

thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sukhvirlam (talk • contribs) 03:39, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
 * . No I didn't, look again. I protected the page and made no edits based on content. Others changed it into a redirect. I will point out that being a member of a group does not in itself confer notability. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:49, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Regarding Recent Full Protection Action
I noticed that recently took bold action to WP:Full the article Francesca Ramsey due to the recent content disputes since VidCon. I wanted to suggest that you might consider Full Protection of Anita Sarkeesian. Evidence of the need for this action is here and throughout that pages recent history. Thanks in advance for any consideration! - Sleyece 00:29:53, July 4, 2017 (UTC)
 * OK. It looks like there is close to consensus on the talk page so just a couple of days. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:47, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Anita Sarkeesian
Can you please explain why you protected Anita Sarkeesian, a page which had not been edited in nearly 29 hours? Mark Schierbecker (talk) 10:28, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 * . It looked like a minor edit war and an incomplete discussion on the talk page. See section above. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:35, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I request that this action be reversed immediately. Full protection is an extreme overreaction to just three reverts. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 00:09, 5 July 2017 (UTC)


 * . OK but keep an eye on it. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:16, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Mark Schierbecker (talk) 00:38, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Btw, you removed the indefinite page-move protection - - that predated your recent protection.... maybe that should be restored? Shearonink (talk) 01:18, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, autoconfirmed and move protection need to be retired. IPs are already after the page.--Cúchullain t/ c 12:07, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Restored the EC. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:23, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2017).

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Happyme22 • Dragons flight
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Zad68

Guideline and policy news
 * The RFC discussion regarding WP:OUTING and WMF essay about paid editing and outing (see more at the ArbCom noticeboard archives) is now archived. Milieus #3 and #4 received support; so did concrete proposal #1.

Technical news
 * Fuzzy search will soon be added to Special:Undelete, allowing administrators to search for deleted page titles with results similar to the search query. You can test this by adding ?fuzzy=1 to the URL, as with Special:Undelete?fuzzy=1. Currently the search only finds pages that exactly match the search term.
 * A new bot will automatically revision delete unused file versions from files in Category:Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old.

Miscellaneous
 * A newly revamped database report can help identify users who may be eligible to be autopatrolled.
 * A potentially compromised account from 2001–2002 attempted to request resysop. Please practice appropriate account security by using a unique password for Wikipedia, and consider enabling two-factor authentication. Currently around 17% of admins have enabled 2FA, up from 16% in February 2017.
 * Did you know: On 29 June 2017, there were 1,261 administrators on the English Wikipedia – the exact number of administrators as there were ten years ago on 29 June 2007. Since that time, the English Wikipedia has grown from 1.85 million articles to over 5.43 million.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:59, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Malliya Rechana, Kavijanasrayam
I believe you had blocked me and Abrahmad111 few days back. I have a question. Abrahmad111 is constantly fooling and undoing and removing much older and antique (The Indian Antiquary) research references in order to attribute a poet to his region rather than sticking to the history. I have kept his references (which are mostly a thesis and individual writings unlike The Indian Antiquary) and only removed his unreferenced personal theories but he has been removing all my referenced info to put forth only his theories. Now he removed my content and writes one has to stick to the old style. This fellow creates duplicate pages and vandalizes pages to put forth his theories. He is not able to bear if I keep the theories in chronological order and removes the old theories which do not attribute the work or the poet to his homeplace. Unlike him I am trying to keep both theories but he keeps the newer theories and adds his personal theories as well. What do you advise? I am going to wait for your advise. Thanks SubhashiniIyer (talk) 12:01, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

I am very sorry CambridgeBayWeather, I do not know how else to fix the article. I have added all the historical theories in a balanced chronological manner. Nothing is written in stone about this subject. Some people who are of biased nature are trying to claim the subject to their region without showing the historical debates and the controversial nature of the subject. I will wait and see for now. Please do advise. Thank you SubhashiniIyer (talk) 22:31, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Religion in Israel
Hi, I noticed you added ecp to this article and was wondering why. I haven't seen any major reason to do so judging by the history. Sir Joseph (talk) 20:25, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * That's because I misread the dates of the edits. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:39, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks and no problem. Sir Joseph (talk) 20:54, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Escape the Night
Thanks for looking at this request at WP:RFPP. However, it looks like you semi-protected it for 48 hours, but you posted directly underneath the request that you semi-protected it for 1 week. Which duration did you mean to perform? Thanks, and regards. 187.66.29.98 (talk) 21:36, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for catching that. I fixed it for the week. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:48, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Might I request that you open the page back up? There are some major mistakes on the page as it is, and to lock it now seems like an overreaction. Thank you. 71.206.172.121 (talk) 19:54, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Go to the talk page and request your edits there. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:14, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Deleted my sandbox page
Hi, you deleted my sanbox page in December 2016. I would like this back please. Or at the very least provide me wth the raw code back, in particular the code for the timeline graphic I had on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by XxDalekcaanxx (talk • contribs) 07:47, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * . I have restored it at User:XxDalekcaanxx/sandbox. Please do something with it. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:41, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

List of Canadian provincial and territorial symbols
Hi CambridgeBayWeather. Would you mind checking this edit you made to List of Canadian provincial and territorial symbols? It looks like the three images you removed were all from Commons. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:30, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
 * . Thanks. That's strange because when I checked the first time they were the non-free files. Fixed it. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:24, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Non-free images which are continously re-added to an article after they have been removed sometimes starts me thinking in terms of patterns instead of individual edits, especially if the same editor is doing the re-adding. So, when that person deviates from the pattern and actually adds a free image instead, it can be easy for me to just react the same as before unless I remind myself to actually check the file each time. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:16, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

caution, or maybe block is in order
Hi, My health is not well at all at the moment. So please excuse my message for being concise and vague. You had not so recently blocked two users for 24h. They never stopped fighting. Now they have escalated to mild personal attacks, and comments about each-other's nations. It is very serious as it is India-Pak. I didnt realise it sooner cuz I have been unable to follow my watchlist due to my falling (degrading/deteriorating) health. Kindly take a look at the matter. Talk:Malliya Rechana. Thanks. — usernamekiran (talk)  21:49, 9 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Oh my God, usernamekiran, seriously brother your health is too much deteriorated otherwise you would not call a debate on an author and authorship and his association with some regions within India as some fictional intercountry thing that you wrote. This is purely an Indian subject and you need not worry too much. Wow! SubhashiniIyer (talk) 03:11, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Summit Airlines  question
Hi, not really a Wiki contributor,   so not sure if i am doing this right. But https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Summit_Air&type=revision&diff=739594288&oldid=738767665 you edited the ICAO code in the above entry .... I just need to know where you got that specific piece of info. Since ICAO codes are always 3chars long  .... and further more "SU"  is used by  a Russian Airline, so something does not add up. From what is see in other sources "SMM" is still the correct  ICAO for     Summit. let me know thnx SebU — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.20.26.130 (talk) 15:28, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
 * It seems that I can't find a source for either SMM or SU. I removed it for two reasons. One I can't find anything to source it with and a look at List of airline codes (S) shows that the SMM is for a US based airline called Summit Airlines with a call sign of "SUMMIT-AIR" rather than "SUMMIT". I suspect that the SU was taken from the "Daily Air Traffic Record"s that we use at work and was probably given to us by Nav Canada. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:54, 14 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Thank you. (btw: not sure why Wiki keeps kicking me out constantly, and it only shows me as a public IP.). https://www.planespotters.net/airline/Summit-Air  https://www.airlines-inform.com/world_airlines/Summit_Air.html http://flysummitair.com/      User:SUrbaniak 2017-07-14T17:59Z


 * I'm not sure why you get logged out. It used to happen quite often but that was years ago. You could ask at WP:Village pump/Technical as they might know. The Planespotters link may be correct but it might not. I recall that it was not a reliable source for fleet size. Notice that Planespotters has a fleet size of 9 but Transport Canada has 19 aircraft. Not sure about the other link. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:07, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Алфа - Го
Did Draft:Алфа - Го get transwikied to bg.wp before deletion? VQuakr (talk) 17:48, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
 * . No. Do you want it so you can do it? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:12, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Sure. Can't say I've done one before, but it looks like step-by-step instructions are available. User:VQuakr/Алфа - Го would work us a userfication target. Thank you! VQuakr (talk) 22:52, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * should be there now. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:09, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Please!!
Why are you constantly deleting my page please mind your business. List of companies in Greece admins placed the most historic companis in Greece they also placed some companies without wikipedia so I created 2-3 pages fot them. Please don't delete my pages again! W220greece (talk) 22:31, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

.
Can you please create a page for the company kostoulas because this company deserves a wiki? — Preceding unsigned comment added by W220greece (talk • contribs) 22:40, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Page creation of the company Kostoulas
If you don't mind could you create a corretc page for that company? W220greece (talk) 22:44, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Arab-Israeli Conflict
Can you please give me a good reason why new editors are prohibited from editing this Arab-Israeli conflict related page? Jsnsnsnsnsnsn (talk) 02:18, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Take a look at the pages linked from WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:10, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Pat Weisner
Can you please ensure the page 'Pat Weisner' remains protected from vandalism permanently and not just for a few days.

Can the part about abandoning a car be deleted as it is an incorrect report and was never proven to be correct. Jeandebougett (talk) 09:14, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * . It's already been fixed, here. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:17, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Can you please lock this again for a longer period to protect from vandalism
 * . Articles are not protected unless they actually being vandalised. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:21, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Was vandalised by wizbangboom55 and will be again.
 * . That was 10 July. We don't protect over one or two edits. If the page looks like this then protection becomes necessary. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:54, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Protection decline for 2017 Jobar offensive
Regarding your reasoning that there has not been enough disruptive activity to justify protection I will list all of the disruptive edits. In three days there has been: four removals of sourced info by IP editors (possibly same person, with highly non-neutral edit summaries), one removal by an apparent single-purpose account, two additions of unsourced information by two IP editors  (one being with apparent non-neutral wording). If you are still of the opinion that this isn't enough then I will not push the matter further. Thank you for your time! Cheers! EkoGraf (talk) 10:38, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * . I gave it a months pending changes. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:42, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you! And once again, sorry for the bother. EkoGraf (talk) 12:45, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

change protection
could you please change semi-protection would not being edit that's why pokemon sun and moon episode 34 now finally finished aired, then I can edit myself. Oripaypaykim (talk) 10:52, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * . No. You and the IP were edit warring. Take it to the talk page and get consensus. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:59, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
 * well I herd multiple IP shows keep out change translate Japanese to English which means aired must ongoing aired until its finished, I do nothing else make edit conflict. Oripaypaykim (talk) 11:53, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Page Move
Please move XM8 rifle to Heckler & Koch XM8

Reason:

Every Heckler & Koch product starts with Heckler & Koch like Heckler & Koch MP5 Wikihistory (talk) 10:59, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Notary
Hey,

Thanks a lot for protecting the 'Notary' page. Users from Pakistan are making changes to the spelling of Notary to Notry because of this spelling mistake made in court documents submitted in Supreme Court Pakistan related to corruption case against the Prime Minister.

- Asif — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asifniz (talk • contribs) 11:13, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Why wass...up zingagi page deleted?
Why wass...up zingagi page deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Surat Visit (talk • contribs) 12:13, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
 * . It was a copyright violation. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:38, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/Routron3000
The user was blatantly obvious from the beginning that they were the same person as, as labeled it on the user talkpage. 115.164.82.231 (talk) 14:00, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Shahram Jazayeri
Would you please explain the revert? Pahlevun (talk) 12:46, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
 * . It's a BLP and you removed several references. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:48, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
 * That's not an adequate explanation. Are you able to prove that these references were legit? Pahlevun (talk) 12:53, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
 * No but if you remove the three of them then all the statements they support must be removed as well. Are you saying they don't support what is said? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:56, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
 * One of the three sources is not accessible at all. Of the remaining two, one is an op-ed, which is not even published by a reliable source and the other, which is in English, cites the claims he made in the court, which is presented as a fact in the article. Clearly WP:SYNTH. Pahlevun (talk) 13:10, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Famous Dex
Hi, saw you removed the MfD tag (thank you!) on this draft. I'm still in the process of cleaning it up, but what's the easiest way to move this into the article space once I'm done with it? thanks, Melodies1917 (talk) 19:49, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
 * . You are already autoconfirmed and could move it yourself. You could also one of the templates at Template:AFC submission/draft such as and this would allow another editor to review it and point out any problems. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:08, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Soomra dynasty
Hello, can you protect Soomra dynasty for several months. As this IP user keeps putting Unreferenced word salad. (2600:1001:B022:9456:78B8:AE85:6CBD:C2A (talk) 17:57, 27 July 2017 (UTC))
 * Given it two weeks. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:31, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi, you semi'd Soomra dynasty a few days ago after a request at RfPP. Within hours of the protection ending, the anon is back making the same awful contribution. - Sitush (talk) 13:40, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
 * . That should have been two weeks and not two days. Fixed now. And I moved your comment up here to keep it in the same section. 20:45, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem, thanks. I didn't realise someone else had also asked a few days ago. - Sitush (talk) 03:58, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Request for Reprotecting the page Arijit Singh
Hello This is to inform you to, that your protection of the page Arijit Singh is expired but the vandalism is going on by editor Umair Aj. They are deleting references and damaging formatting and removing attributed contents which are not WP:PEACOCKING. It seems they strong dislike the singer and are also deleting contents on the song's article sung by him placing tags and taking it into Afd's etc. Although the article Arijit Singh's formatting and structure has been damage due to vandalism by the editor but I do not intend to revert those back, as it will create editing conflicts. I am not here to fall in conflicts, I am here only to contribute as much as I can by reviewing new pages, adding new well sourced contents on existing pages, creating articles, Participating at Afd and other important stuffs. Currently I am also busy due to real life commitments. I hope you will counter vandalism as you have lot of more experience than me. Take care have a love day Anoptimistix Let's Talk  03:32, 30 July 2017 (UTC) Anoptimistix  Let's Talk  03:32, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Human factors and ergonomics
You previously fully protected this article to stop the edit-warring: Administrators'_noticeboard/3RRArchive346

RickyBennison has finally responded now that the protection is ended and I undid his revert when he ignored the talk page discussion. He is threatening to continue edit-warring. I was going to request that full protection be restored, but thought it might be better to see what you think. --Ronz (talk) 17:54, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The protection expired on 27 July and RickyBennison hasn't edited it in that time. For now it should be fine. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:45, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks. You're correct. The page protection didn't get him to participate in building consensus, so it probably won't again. If he continues his edit-warring without further discussion, I'll request he be blocked once again. Meanwhile, I'll try other methods of resolving the issue. --Ronz (talk) 21:18, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2017). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Anarchyte • GeneralizationsAreBad • Cullen328 (first RfA to reach WP:300)
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Cprompt • Rockpocket • Rambo's Revenge • Animum • TexasAndroid • Chuck SMITH • MikeLynch • Crazytales • Ad Orientem

Guideline and policy news
 * Following a series of discussions around new pages patrol, the WMF is helping implement a controlled autoconfirmed article creation trial as a research experiment, similar to the one proposed in 2011. You can learn more about the research plan at meta:Research:Autoconfirmed article creation trial. The exact start date of the experiment has yet to be determined.
 * A new speedy deletion criterion, regarding articles created as a result undisclosed paid editing, is currently being discussed (permalink).
 * An RfC (permalink) is currently open that proposes expanding WP:G13 to include all drafts, even if they weren't submitted through Articles for Creation.

Technical news
 * LoginNotify should soon be deployed to the English Wikipedia. This will notify users when there are suspicious login attempts on their account.
 * The new version of XTools is nearing an official release. This suite of tools includes administrator statistics, an improved edit counter, among other tools that may benefit administrators. You can report issues on Phabricator and provide general feedback at mw:Talk:XTools.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

NBA Playgrounds
Hello,

Regarding the censoring of the page by some individuals and their abuse of the Wikipedia system to stop me from providing a vital piece of information. The game does not allow offline play (on PS4) as it requires a constant internet connection and there are many complaints on the games official forums with acknowledgment from the developers that they might address this issue in the future.

As for the these individuals asking for a source, then by that logic the entire "Gameplay" section must be removed from the Wikipedia page as there is no source to that as well.

Thank you for protecting this page, but please add this important piece of information as people are paying $20 and are shocked that the game does not function in single player without a constant connection on the PS4. I am trying to help others avoid a problem by providing essential information before heir purchase. Any attempt to delete that data would be viewed as censorship.

This is one such complaint from he official game forum and an acknowledgment from the developers of the issue:

https://playgroundsgame.com/support/discussion/111/how-to-play-offline

Thank you for understanding — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.26.72.4 (talk) 03:58, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I can't make a unilateral decision about that page. You need to go to the talk page and discuss it there. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:12, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Wikimania
Hi there. I'm getting excited about WikiConference North America and Wikimania. Will you also be in Montreal next week? --Rosiestep (talk) 14:10, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
 * . Unfortunately not. I have to stay and work as I gave one of the others here August off to go visit his aunt. I hope you enjoy your time there. I have been a few times and found it a great place. I really enjoyed that the city didn't find the need to shut down at 7 pm. It seemed more European than other cities in Canada. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:21, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Reprotect Ravana
People continue to remove academic information relating to Buddhism, just because of personal beliefs.<b style="color:#0000FF;">VictoriaGrayson</b><b style="font-family:Helvetica Neue;color:#707">Talk</b> 16:24, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
 * . I've added two months pending changes. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:29, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Jimmy Iovine—time to reprotect?
Since I've been involved directly with reverting, I want to check with you, as the administrator who last protected the page.

The same issues that led to the page's last protection, related to the subject's ethnic and/or religious background, are arising again. I've reverted back to the version of the text at the time of your last protection. Do you feel it's time to reprotect the article? —C.Fred (talk) 12:22, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
 * . I added a months extended. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:41, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Here's hoping I'm not dropping you another note about this in a month's time. —C.Fred (talk) 13:00, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Minimum Information Required About a Glycomics Experiment
Hi, Thank you for checking the "Minimum Information Required About a Glycomics Experiment" page. Was just wondering what your motivation was for removing the input of Snoopy0268. Was it the content or the presentation? Thank you for letting me know best lisacek — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lisacek (talk • contribs) 13:33, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
 * . It was that they changed references to external links in the middle of the article and looked to remove another reference. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:57, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Cassils
Discussion on reverting a move you made in 2014 has opened here. 117Avenue (talk) 05:52, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Disraeli Gears - SWLABR Cream clip.ogg
 Thanks for uploading File:Disraeli Gears - SWLABR Cream clip.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

User keeps reverting my edit
This user keeps reverting my edits and I'm making the correct edits in adding a cited source to Adam Cole the wrestle and this user reverted it twice I don't want to get into a edit war so can you resolve this please TheKinkdomMan (talk) 04:44, 15 August 2017 (UTC) TheKinkdomMan (talk) 04:44, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
 * you and should take a look at Manual of Style/Lead section, "The presence of citations in the introduction is neither required in every article nor prohibited in any article." The sentence is sourced as well at Adam Cole so it is a matter for discussion on the talk page as to if the extra source is required in the lead. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:31, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

What I've read it seems like we were both right on the other hand he did leave a rude message on my wall just to be clear I was nice to him when I left a message I don't know why he got hotsile but never the less I'm gonna continue to edit to the best of my ability thanks for clearing this up TheKinkdomMan (talk) 14:51, 15 August 2017 (UTC) TheKinkdomMan (talk) 14:51, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Deletion review for Draft:Tensor product of representations
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Draft:Tensor product of representations. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Taku (talk) 09:22, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Actually, looking at that discussion, could you give a policy-based (or guideline or whatever) reason for the redirect? I just don't understand it, but I'm not an MfD regular. Hobit (talk) 17:58, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Willfull and persistent disruption of Draft space by TakuyaMurata". Thank you. Hasteur (talk) 12:43, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Time to reprotect AGT season 12?
You were the original protector of America's Got Talent Season 12. It just became unprotected today and IP editors are already adding unsourced content. As soon as it's removed they add it back. I was wondering if you could reprotect it? TheDoctorWho (talk) 20:14, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you!!! TheDoctorWho (talk) 21:54, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I've gone with a month. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:59, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Alt-Right Footer Template - Should Donald Trump be here?
Hi Cambridge, hope all is well for you at the moment. In light of Washington Post's article on Trump being an alt-right figure, I've originally added him on the template for the alt-right footer. However, DarkKing Rayleigh reverted the footer. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt, but I'm concerned undoing his edit would trigger an edit war. Would you mind adding a third opinion so the page won't end up spiraling into an edit war? Thanks! Nexenhero91 (talk) 23:20, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * . I have no opinion on him being alt-right or not. It's a good job you didn't revert because at Template talk:Alt-right footer it says that the page is subject to one revert per 24 hour period. The talk page is where you should now be taking this. I looked at the the NYT piece. It looks like an editorial/opinion piece. Also it does not seem to me to flat out say he is alt-right but that, as per the headline, he sides with them. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:17, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Louise Linton page
Hi

You appear to have locked the Louise Linton article for excessive editing, which is fairly accurate as some of the ongoing edits were extremely biased and opinion based.

It has been locked, however, AFTER considerable 'positive' washing by what appears to be an individual or organisation positively managing Ms Linton's media profile.

The controversies section has been removed entirely (this has been in place since 2016) as well as all reference to negative media coverage and source links regarding the recent Instagram controversy. It appears that the relevant sections have been redrafted to positively reflect and diminish the negative coverage of yesterday's media event.

Yesterday's Instagram controversy gained extensive international media coverage, mostly neutral to negative, similar to the coverage regarding her withdrawn memoir.

I believe the current article needs editing to reflect both sides of the recent event, not just Ms Linton's PR perspective.

kind regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fjb3012 (talk • contribs) 22:46, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
 * You are on the wrong page. I have nothing to do with the content of the article. You need to bring this up at Talk:Louise Linton. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:48, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

AN3 complaint about Ariana Grande discography
See Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. It appears that three different IPs from the 87.166.* range have been reverting the article. My inclination would be to apply conventional semiprotection. (You previously applied pending changes). Any comments? Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 02:12, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
 * and
 * and

Need your help to protect the article
Greetings, dear sir. I'm asking you to protect the following page, as it is being attacked by an anonymous user, who is waging an edit war there (and who has already violated the three-revert rule) in an effort to replace an interpretation accepted by scholars and supported by reliable sources with his own historical revisionism taken from thin air. The user ignores any sources cited in the article, as well as a warning left on his talk page, labels everything he doesn't like as "dogwhistle" and "propaganda". Californian Cat (talk) 08:43, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I gave it 4 days. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 08:57, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you, sir. I hope it will be enough. Californian Cat (talk) 09:11, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Sir, the same vandal who attacked the aforementioned article has come back and is now trying to remove sourced content and push his marginal POV there . I have to ask you to protect the page again. Californian Cat (talk) 14:45, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I've given it another week. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:06, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the help. Californian Cat (talk) 18:32, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Montenegrin presidential election, 2013
Could you possibly ramp up the protection to full? It seems there may be some sock/meatpuppetry involved beyond simply IPs. Cheers, Number   5  7  23:11, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I've gone with a month extended confirmed. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:48, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jayden222
Hi CambridgeBayWeather. A while back you closed Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jayden222 as delete. I think the same editor is back as User talk:Jayden27572, and I think there may be a few more "JaydenXXXX" accounts out there as well I removed some images from per WP:NFCC. I usually just remove the file, but for some reason this time around I made the connection between the latest sandbox and that particular MfD discussion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:17, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * . Thanks. I deleted and blocked the 27572 indefinite and the 222 for a week. I checked the other Jayden accounts but didn't find anything definite. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:38, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I can't remember right now what the other accounts were; it's possible they weren't even Jayden accounts to begin with. I do remember removing similar Big Brother logos from user pages which were similar in content to the Jayden pages though, so maybe one of them will pop up on my watchlist again. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:50, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Let me know if you do find any more. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:57, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I see this has been dealt with. I'll just note that many of these Big Brother fantasy game players do the same thing.  they copy an existing Big Brother article to their user space and then modify it so it can be really difficult to identify if they various accounts are sockpuppet accounts or different people paying games teh same way. -- Whpq (talk) 14:08, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi CambridgeBayWeather and . I think I may have come across another one at . -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:21, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Can't tell for sure but I deleted their user page. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:42, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Another one popped up at User talk:C.Fred. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:20, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Ethnolinguistic/Ethnic group
Greetings! The discussion here has been going on for several months, but it's unclear what is the denouement. It was also apparently marred by some canvassing. Could you please assess and close it? Kind regards-- Soupforone (talk) 04:50, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
 * . I read through that but I can't see that there is any clear decision to be made. Sorry. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:50, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks; that is what I thought. Cheers-- Soupforone (talk) 14:16, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Look What You Made Me Do
My edit were not vandalism, why are you insinuating that? Did you look at the sources? iTunes Google Play Spotify There's a reason why I added the image to the page. (121.214.32.236 (talk) 11:38, 29 August 2017 (UTC))
 * Please ignore this message, while I still don't think my edits constitute vandalism, I understand why the image has been removed now. (121.214.32.236 (talk) 13:12, 29 August 2017 (UTC))

2017 Summer Universiade - Schedule
Hi!

You forgot to add 2 disciplines in Diving - Men's and Women's team classifications - into Schedule section. There were awarded medals in 15 disciplines at Summer Universiade in Diving. So, on August 27, 2017 was awarded 4 sets of medals, not 2 as you wrote. Please correct this section.

Regards.


 * . I didn't edit the page, I protected it. I leave it up to other editors to add or subtract content. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:40, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Myrobotlab page deletion
I am concerned that you and another user have deleted the new page relating to the Myrobotlab robotics platform. Myrobotlab is an established and respected Free and Open Source platform for Intelligent Machine Control used in at least 10 countries.

The link to the down-load of the platform is located on the Myrobotlab web-site. The Myrobotlab.org web-site is a research resource where users and interested parties can create a blog to discuss issues and ideas seek information in relation to the use of the Robotics platform as well as related issues including Artificial Intelligence, Electronics and 3D printing.

Myrobotlab is not a business or a commercial enterprise. It is a technology resource created by developers, for developers as well as learners and is a valuable educational tool. Myrobotlab has been in use and development for at least five years and is administered by a team of skilled developers who continually provide their own time to develop the resource for people all around the world.

In terms of the impact of Myrobotlab, it is the principle platform used by Gael Langevin, the creator of the inMoov humanoid android robot, in the world's first, life-sized, 3D-printed humanoid robot. Gael is also one of the developers of the Myrobotlab platform and he actively uses and promotes the Myrobotlab robotics platform. As such, Myrobotlab is discussed extensively on the internet as well as at international Maker Faires where Gael presents his robots. I am concerned that this resource is being blocked from Wikipedia when so many meaningless and pointless subjects are supported and promoted despite having no educational value, use or real interest. The Myrobotlab educational resource is already well known in the robotics community and certainly warrants community access.

I ask that you assist in fixing this issue.

Thank you, Annie Darkhorse — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annie Darkhorse (talk • contribs) 09:00, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Dear Sir, as others have stated, myrobotlab is a robotics platform, the brain of the robotics and worldwide used in open source robotics. A few are the inmoov, designed by Gael langevin (inmoov.fr) and build by thousands. Also the automated chess board was programmed and automated with the help of myrobotlab (https://en.chessbase.com/post/world-s-smartest-chess-board-is-here).

And there are many other projects that are beeing made on universities around the world that use the myrobotlab software. If you need links to sources, and all, let us do so, and let us make the myrobotlab page. it was 2012 when it was discussed, and since then we (users and developers on myrobotlab) have made such a big impact in robotics, with the proudest our inmoov. and i say our, yes it is designed by Gael Langevin, but it was with the help from all the users, mods and owners from myrobotlab that inmoov became such a succes.

There is no way denying a full sized humanoid 3d printed robot that does ted talks, maker fairs and travels all around the world, powered by myrobotlab software.

Please let us show myrobotlab has evolved from a small single user project to a worldwide accepted and loved platform for all platforms. If after say a month you still think we do not have enough sources and quotes and links, you could delete it again, but we would be able to prove our point that what was small in 2012 is huge now.

Thank you for your time and it would be great if we could show what we have made for the entire robotics community.

WvanToorn akaHappilyDefinedHumanoid HappilyDefinedHumanoid (talk) 09:57, 31 August 2017 (UTC)


 * and . I have put these two together as they are part of the same thing. There were no references in the article, see Help:Referencing for beginners for more information. The sources must be separate from the company reports. I was going to suggest, but I see that Draft:Myrobotlab is already in place. Create it there with proper source then suubmitt it. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:53, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2017). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Nakon • Scott
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Sverdrup • Thespian • Elockid • James086 • Ffirehorse • Celestianpower • Boing! said Zebedee

Guideline and policy news
 * ACTRIAL, a research experiment that restricts article creation to autoconfirmed users, will begin on September 7. It will run for six months. You can learn more about the research specifics at meta:Research:Autoconfirmed article creation trial, while Wikipedia talk:Autoconfirmed article creation trial is probably the best venue for general discussion.
 * Following an RfC, WP:G13 speedy deletion criterion now applies to any page in the draftspace that has not been edited in six months. There is a bot-generated report, updated daily, to help identify potentially qualifying drafts that have not been submitted through articles for creation.

Technical news
 * You will now get a notification when someone tries to log in to your account and fails. If they try from a device that has logged into your account before, you will be notified after five failed attempts. You can also set in your preferences to get an email when someone logs in to your account from a new device or IP address, which may be encouraged for admins and accounts with sensitive permissions.
 * Syntax highlighting is now available as a beta feature (more info). This may assist administrators and template editors when dealing with intricate syntax of high-risk templates and system messages.
 * In your notification preferences, you can now block specific users from pinging you. This functionality will soon be available for Special:EmailUser as well.

Arbitration
 * Applications for CheckUser and Oversight are being accepted by the Arbitration Committee until September 12. Community discussion of the candidates will begin on September 18.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Please open article Šiprage
Please open the article of Šiprage. I have significant census data from 1885-→ BosGenius (talk) 20:37, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
 * you need to explain at Talk:Šiprage what it is you want to add. Explain in detail. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 02:14, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

SWLSB Wikipedia
Hello, What is the purpose of continuing too leave things, part of greater Montréal, when it is not true. Why revert back for the proper spelling of Québec not Quebec?
 * Well Rosemère, Quebec says it is part of Montreal. And it is Montreal and Quebec not Montréal and Québec because this is the English Wikipedia and if there is a valid English language spelling we use it. See Article titles. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:19, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Academica
I need to do Academica (libary) Academica (charter school) disambiguation. Please do not move academica (charter school) back. Name Academica is too generic to use it just for the charter schol. I am working on it. Puncinus (talk) 22:38, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Protection of Bigg Boss Telugu (season 1)
Thanks for protecting Bigg Boss Telugu season 1. Can you extend the page protection for 2 more days because all vandalism happenes mostly in weekend & Monday. Joshq.JQ   08:11, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I've extended it until the 12 Spetember. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:04, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Batman: Arkham Origins
I'm not sure if protection was requested but it seems a bit OTT, the next step was to revert him and refer him to WP:BRD since he is ignoring facts and just putting in what he wants. Protection isn't required, the user education is. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 12:02, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * There was already enough reverting. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:35, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * There were 4 reverts. It's not even enough to consider it edit warring yet. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 16:13, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Kevin De Bruyne
You have protected his page yet there is a false fact claiming he played for Manchester United in his youth! This is completely false and why dose it keep getting re added when it's removed Stone1312 (talk) 12:31, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't know why anything is added or removed as I don't edit the page. I just protect pages when they are being warred over. The correct place to take your concerns is at Talk:Kevin De Bruyne. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:56, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Zwierzewo
Bigfoot looks like bullshit as well, but he's on here. Can i see some sources. Santa Claus is on here too, show me proof that he is real! This is common folklore in my beloved village of Zwierzewo, of which the only proof i have of is the conversations i've had with the 10th generation village elders. So take a seat mate and leave the edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MasterEditor69 (talk • contribs) 02:35, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to Admin confidence survey
Hello,

Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.

The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.

To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.

We really appreciate your input!

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 19:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

America's Got Talent (Season 12)
I hate to be a bother but America's Got Talent (season 12) just became unprotected again and disruptive editing, test editing, and addition of unsourced material is already being done by IP editors. I was wondering if you could reprotect one time? (hopefully after the season finale the hype dies down a bit.) TheDoctorWho (talk) 17:06, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:48, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you!!! TheDoctorWho (talk) 17:56, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

IP at the Jennifer's Body article
Hi, CambridgeBayWeather. As seen at, an IP hopper continues to edit disruptively, removing things on a WP:IDON'TLIKEIT basis. The IP hopper has been repeatedly reverted by me, General Ization and Gladamas. After you protected the article, Anarchyte protected the article. The IP waited for the latest protection to wear off and then went back to the WP:IDON'TLIKEIT editing. Will one of you consider protecting the article for significantly longer, like for a few months? I do not see that the IP hopper will stop, and it's a waste of time for editors to keep reverting him or her. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 19:08, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I gave it a month. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:21, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Do we just keep extending the protection each time this happens? Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 20:22, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes usually. Trying to find something long enough that the IP goes away. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:56, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, but seeing as it's only one IP hopper the protections will be increased more incrementally than if it were hit by lots of vandalism from various people. <font face="Papyrus"><font color="##0d80ad">Anarchyte (<font color="#0d5fad">work  &#124; <font color="#0d5fad">talk )  21:57, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Not necessarily. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:00, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

So I made this thing.......
I made this apology to Bythebooklibrary, I'm not sure how to contact them so that they can read it if they want ot but I figured that maybe you could link it to them or something. Sorry for being a pain.★Trekker (talk) 19:31, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
 * {[u|*Treker}}. That looks good to me, especially as you didn't post on his talk page nor ping him. I've notified Bythebooklibrary about it. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:05, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Messed up the ping. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:20, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Just observing how pleasant it is to see this kind of civility! In all my years on Wikipedia I don't think I've ever witnessed someone man up and apologize like this after a dispute. No blocks, no drawn out ANI fights, no sockpuppeting.. why can't all disputes end like this? Sigh. -- &oelig; &trade; 05:46, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Manny Pacquiao again
Talk:Manny_Pacquiao

Note that one user insists that as no BLP issues exist (?) that he can revert the deletion of what appears to be problematic material using the comment " (revert to the previous stable version, that is fully supported by reliable and verifiable sources. There are no BLP issues.) "  and then editwar the removal of the material which has been questioned with "undo revert with no explanation given in summary) "  which appears to me to be a problematic means of editing.  He did not hit 3RR as the other re-insertion was by  "IP 124.106.132.39"  .   Note that htree seasoned editors have removed the material as being possibly violative of WP:BLP and only one seems to reinsert it asserting that no BLP issues exist.  I rather think that where three editors do see BLP issues, and only one says they do not exist, that a neutral RfC is the minimum requirement?  Your view? Collect (talk) 15:50, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Well it looks like I'm a bit late here. The page is currently semied and the editor has been blocked. It really needs a proper discussion at the BLP noticeboard. The last discussion seemed more about editors complaining about each other. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:32, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The real problem editor got only 48 hours - and not for the Pacquaio material.  Seems a tad unequal treatment, considering the number of non-Filipinos he got blocked as "socks" in rapid fire succession.  I suggest you scan the discussions a tad further as a result. Collect (talk) 13:14, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * There seems to me that there is little point in taking action until the material is put back in. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:03, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Arctic weather seems bizarre
Ulukhaktok has some bizarre elements: in nine of the twelve months, the number of average precipitation days is less than the number of average rain days plus the number of average snow days. What's wrong? This doesn't seem like a rounding issue, and while I suppose I can see it being the result of rain and snow occurring on the same day, this particularly makes no sense in March and December. These months' record highs are below freezing, and there are 0.0 average rainy days in each month, yet there's 0.1 snowy day in each month not appearing in precipitation days — despite precipitation requiring 0.2 mm and snow requiring 2 mm. Shouldn't there be more precipitation than snow in the wintry months, since showing up as snowy requires ten times as much snow as showing up as precipitation does? Nyttend (talk) 02:48, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure. I see that it is exactly what the source says. Ulukhaktok isn't the only one. Cambridge Bay is similar. Also look at the totals for the year. 29.4 and 51.5 which = 80.9 but the source has 78.9. You might try the Reference desk/Mathematics and see if they have any idea or try this. For the last sentence. The snow is collected and melted. It is measured before and after melting. So 2.0 cm of snow may equal 2.0 mm but may just as easily be 1.8 mm or 1.6 mm. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:45, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Doesn't the protection policy support protecting pages under the ARBPIA restriction?
Hey, sorry to take this to your talk page, but this got archived, and I still do not understand your rationale for not protecting the page, since in your reply you specifically said that you had protected another page based solely on someone applying a very broad interpretation of ARBPIA to the Edward Said article, but the narrower one I was working with required evidence of specific disruption on the Straits of Tiran article? IPs and new accounts are not allowed edit that page anyway per WP:ARBPIA3, and they have been doing so recently. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 10:11, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
 * That said, if you want evidence of disruption rather than simply treating it as a procedural matter: here is an IP in June vandalizing the page; here is a new account (less than 500 edits) removing maintenance tags and replacing them with citations of Wikipedia articles; here is an IP in March making (what looks like?) a POV edit based on his/her personal opinion of the author of the source, which if said author was still alive would have been a BLP-violation meriting removal of the edit summary. There has been only one other non-minor edit to the page this year -- the entire page history since 2017-01-02 has been nothing but disruption by editors who shouldn't be editing the page, reverts of said disruption, and minor grammatical fixes. Hijiri 88 ( 聖やや ) 10:27, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Did you see Wikipedia talk:Requests for page protection, Wikipedia talk:Requests for page protection/Archive 9 and User talk:Samsara/Archive16. However, I have protected it now. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:23, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Full protection on Sexism
I think Semi would have been just fine; there were some reverts from autoconfirmed editors, but those stopped 13 hours before the protection, and the last IP or new user edit was more than week ago. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants  Tell me all about it.  23:52, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
 * . As the last IP edit was 18 September I would have refused the semi. If the editwarring editors decide they have a consensus then I will be more than happy to unprotect it. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:00, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't think it's an edit war; there's a discussion at talk and another at BLPN. I think that one of the editors is pushing a BLP vio, but they don't seem inclined at all to edit war over it. But if you think full protection is a reasonable preventative measure, then I'll defer to your judgement and let you know when a consensus is reached. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants   Tell me all about it.  00:05, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * You're probably right and neither one will edit again. But I would much rather editors were annoyed with me for the protection than have to block someone for reverting. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:21, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * That's an approach I know all too well, and use all too often. It's a great approach, except for the niggling fact that it usually works. ;) But I'm cool with it if you are. Pun intended, thank you (referring to your username). ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants   Tell me all about it.  01:43, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

EGCG
Instead of just locking the page to actual contibutors, I recommend you that you address issues of destructive vandalism and bias by other people (posing as editors?) who haven't bothered to read the Wikipedia policies that they are quoting. The *correctly* quoted and relevant policies are referenced here: Talk:Epigallocatechin_gallate. 14.200.91.233 (talk) 13:17, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Looks like a bunch of establish editors to me. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:10, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Locking Maram Susli page
Hey, I would like it if you unlocked or at least allowed for a non-biased, non-defamatory page for Maram Susli. Thanks.
 * I don't think so. Put your problems on Talk:Maram Susli. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:12, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

IP
Greetings! Could you please have a look here? An ip keeps removing her ethnic origins. Kind regards-- Soupforone (talk) 03:54, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Given it 2 days. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:45, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks. The ip/spa has now attempted to remove the language markup from here. Could you please keep an eye on this? Kind Regards-- Soupforone (talk) 03:26, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

The ip/spa has again attempted to remove the language template, with a misleading "fixed typo" editing rationale. Can you please watchlist this? Kind Regards-- Soupforone (talk) 13:50, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Concordia Preparatory School (Utah)
Please restore Concordia Preparatory School (Utah). I didn't create the article. It was deleted as "Expired PROD, concern was: Non-notable secondary school", but secondary schools are generally considered notable. <font face="Times">Eastmain (talk • contribs) 16:40, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 * . No problem. Restored. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:58, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – October 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2017). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Boing! said Zebedee • Ansh666 • Ad Orientem
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Tonywalton • AmiDaniel • Silence • BanyanTree • Magioladitis • Vanamonde93 • Mr.Z-man • Jdavidb • Jakec • Ram-Man • Yelyos • Kurt Shaped Box

Guideline and policy news
 * Following a successful proposal to create it, a new user right called "edit filter helper" is now assignable and revocable by administrators. The right allows non-administrators to view the details of private edit filters, but not to edit them.
 * Following a discussion about mass-application of ECP and how the need for logging and other details of an evolving consensus may have been missed by some administrators, a rough guide to extended confirmed protection has been written. This information page describes how the extended-confirmed aspects of the protection policy are currently being applied by administrators.

Technical news
 * You can now search for IP ranges at Special:Contributions. Some log pages and Special:DeletedContributions are not yet supported. Wildcards (e.g. 192.168.0.*) are also not supported, but the popular contribsrange gadget will continue to work.

Arbitration
 * Community consultation on the 2017 candidates for CheckUser and Oversight has concluded. The Arbitration Committee will appoint successful candidates by October 11.
 * A request for comment is open regarding the structure, rules, and procedures of the December 2017 Arbitration Committee election, and how to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Polar oases
Thanks for the help with the rain + snow > precipitation question. Here's another question.

What is a polar oasis? It's mentioned in the infobox image's caption at Devon Island, but I'm not sure what's meant. Just a wet spot in a polar desert? An exceptionally warm place surrounded by "ordinary" polar climates? A Google search basically just finds irrelevant stuff, especially some company by this name that sells frozen snacks from food trucks in the Kansas City metropolitan area. Nyttend (talk) 02:41, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
 * . I'm not a 100% sure but it seems to be an are where the climate is milder and the ground would have more moisture than the surrounding area giving greater plant life, oasis. As the polar desert points out most of the Arctic has little precipitation but the Truelove Lowlands has a "favourable microclimate". I did find some references to polar oasis but they tended to be about plant/animal life in that area(Truelove Lowlands, "polar oasis" define), what is a polar oasis). Alexandra Fiord and Svalbard (Svalbard – A Polar Oasis by Wayne Lynch) are given as polar oasis. I did find Antarctic oasis but nothing really useful. By the way Devon Island seems to be the only mention on Wikipedia ("polar oasis").
 * Thank you. This is somewhat like I was imagining with "an exceptionally warm place...", although I wasn't expecting that greater moisture would also be involved.  Do we have a good article explaining why the poles are deserts?  I'm not clear if it's related to the ice cover (i.e. sublimation produces less water vapor than evaporation does, and thus it's not possible for as much precipitation to fall), or if it's more related to the prevailing winds and thus analogous to the deserts in the Horse latitudes, or if there's some other cause.  Nyttend (talk) 00:17, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure why the Arctic has little precipitation and polar climate doesn't seem to help. Although we seem to have a lot of freshwater. Right now I'm at work and Internet is dial up speed and can't really look off Wikipedia. Some links you may find interesting. Compare the precipitation at Cambridge Bay and Phoenix, Arizona and then use something like Google Earth to compare the amount of visible water around Cambridge to Phoenix. Also Polynya and the North Water Polynya are interesting. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:49, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * It basically comes down to the Clausius-Clapeyron equation. Saturation vapor pressure is approximately an exponential function of temperature. Therefore, in a cold climate there is relatively little moisture in the air that will be available to condense out as rain or snow. User:Nyttend's point about saturation vapor pressure over ice being lower than over liquid also is relevant for some circumstances.
 * The Arctic is a "desert" in the sense that annual precipitation is less than 250 mm over much of the region (though it is considerably higher in some locations, such as coastal Greenland). That's a fairly commonly used criterion for "desert" but it's a rather arbitrary one. Arguably a more meaningful functional definition is whether precipitation is much less than potential evapotranspiration, for example as used in defining dry (B-type) climates in the Koeppen climate classification scheme. By this measure the fraction of the Arctic covered by desert would be much smaller. Shock Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 04:10, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Question
I was wondering if WP:MRNOT specifically the part that states "not on the person who closed the discussion" would relate to this Move Request (specifically to everything added in this revision ? And if so is there anything I can do about it? (Also: yes I realize I dug myself in a deep hole it was not my intention and I'm not asking you to participate I'm just exploring my options.) TheDoctorWho (talk) 01:59, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't really think there is much you can do. Sorry. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:03, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Replying at User talk:TheDoctorWho, since this doesn't involved CambridgeBayWeather.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ &gt;ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ&lt;  20:40, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Small request
Hi, it is too small a thing to take to admin noticeboard for now, but following WP:3RR and WP:BRD could you suggest user TechnicianGB to edit constructively, discuss on talk page to reach consensus with editors he is in conflict with and self-revert following his violation of 3RR rule in 24 hours here:
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=African_admixture_in_Europe&diff=803745940&oldid=803745847
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=African_admixture_in_Europe&diff=803744050&oldid=803739340
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=African_admixture_in_Europe&diff=803698870&oldid=803652117
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=African_admixture_in_Europe&diff=803641325&oldid=803616534

I have asked him myself, but it would be great for you to encourage him to follow proper procedures when attempting to unilaterally change an article. I am personally not involved in the edit dispute. Farangizsaifi (talk) 11:27, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * . I see that you and have posted on your talk pages and Talk:African admixture in Europe which is good. Right now they can't revert because I fully protected it. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:33, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

I just warned today this user for breaking the 3RR rule and to check the sources for a constructive edition on the page and now it's accusing me of doing it, lol. I'm telling him that the 3 RR doesn't count for self reversions or for reversions of 3rd party anonymous IPs but he is just in the "this is my version mood" and doesn't want to hear nothing.

After those 3 reversions I warned him and then I proposed the page for protection:


 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=African_admixture_in_Europe&diff=803652117&oldid=803641370
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=African_admixture_in_Europe&diff=803739340&oldid=803698870
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=African_admixture_in_Europe&diff=803745847&oldid=803744050

I also warned him and he started this senseless discussion blaming me for breaking the rules... this user is pretty new and i'm sure that he has to read a bit better about the rules, as he blamed me before for "breaking the self reversion rule" which is clearly stated that a self reversion does not enter in a 3 RR reversion.

He is also neither editing constructively editing the page, as he is putting changes which contradict the source'. in that African admixture page. I'm just writing things which are mentioned on the sources and below, as those things are not mentioned on any source and he claims that it's a stable version, which was posted months ago by an anonymous IP. --TechnicianGB (talk) 11:42, 4 October 2017 (UTC)


 * CambridgeBayWeather, TechnicianGB: I am not involved in this nor do I aim to become involved in his content dispute with another editor. My only role here has been asking for discussion on talk upon coming across the edit war initated by this editor who disliked the stable version. I have just noticed a breach of procedure TechnicianGB reverting 4 times in 24 hours (EXCLUDING self-reverts - that would make it 5 or 6 as can be seen from his edit history). I also note that it is bad faith to initiate an edit war with another editor to change a stable version and upon the 4th revert to request for the page to be protected to the version he is trying to push through against the stable version. CambridgeBayWesther, I know that there is a rule regarding WP:WRONGVERSION, but I request that when the protection expires, you or TechnicianGB revert it to its original stable version (which has remained for a number of months) and encourage discussion on talk page as per WP:BRD). This is my understanding of Wikipedia rules - note I have avoided taking these breaches to noticeboard - I hate wasting the time of administrators. TechnicianGB as you know I have tried to reason with you as cordially as possible. Rules are there to be followed. Best regards,Farangizsaifi (talk) 11:57, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

That page didn't have a stable version! Those changes were made by anonymous IP users which made a few changes on the page and then never appeared back. Nevermind, we are amending it. That wasn't backed up by the source so it's senseless to revert again to that version. It's as simply as that, if a source can't back up the text (or says different things) then that text has to been removed, as in this case we have lots of sources there and no one says or shows "southern" or "western" but specific places, which you were reverting.

It's not hard to understand, you were reverting good edits based on sources to edits which are not backed on sources. Nevermind again, the admins took care of the issue to see which are factual sources or not. Senseless to continue this ! --TechnicianGB (talk) 12:05, 4 October 2017 (UTC)


 * TechnicianGB The version has been stable since 2015. That is 2 years. Please self-revert as soon as you can and discuss proposed edits on talk page. You are in breach of WP:BRD, WP:3RR and WP:STABLE. CambridgeBayWeather I'm not sure whether I should take this to admin noticeboard. It is a violation of 3 Wikipedia rules in one go, which is pretty serious. Farangizsaifi (talk) 12:14, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

1st of all, you broke the 3RR, the WP:BRD and the sources were not backing up the text !!! there is no stable version in this case, as it's false information. What is hard to understand for you ? I already did the job, I proposed it for protection and the admis are taking care of it. What do you want more ? Your accusations against me are very weak and they haven't got any backup as i'm just sticking to edit factual information and deleting false one which is not mentioned in any source... --TechnicianGB (talk) 12:18, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

I even let a new message in your talk page considering that this discussion is resolved? But I see that you are still in your "I don't hear mood". Ok, for me the discussion is over. Admins are taking care to check sources and data... --TechnicianGB (talk) 12:19, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

ECP on Malcolm Nance
In June, you added 30/500 protection to Malcolm Nance. I don't think that is necessary any longer, can you decrease it to semi-protection? power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 19:10, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * OK. I removed the protection but it is still under discretionary sanctions. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:23, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Environmental impact of war
Probably can be unprotected. The culprit has been rangeblocked. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 20:15, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem. Unprotected. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:26, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Incorrect level article protection
Hi, it seems you have protected the Israeli involvement in the Syrian Civil War as 30/500, even though the article belongs to the SCW&ISIL sanctions regime (not WP:ARBPIA which generally is associated with 30/500). The Syrian Civil War arena is not a part of the Arab-Israeli conflict as concluded in motion and later Community Level Sanctions decision. We can consider SCW&ISIL sanctions to be raised to 30/500 level, but do you think it is necessary?GreyShark (dibra) 15:43, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * . I missed that. So there is no need for any protection. However, I wouldd caution you to be careful. It appears that you made what could be classified as 2 or 3 reverts on the same day. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:43, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the reply and the notice. Do you refer to my 4 edits on October 4th ? If so, to my best understanding those are consecutive reverts and are to be counted as 1 for the purpose of 1RR or 3RR. Am i wrong?GreyShark (dibra) 11:42, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Now that you mention it I'm not sure. I'll look it up again. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:03, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge submissions
Hey, I want to draw your attention to the The 10,000 Challenge.

It is soon be reaching its first-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and no unsourced claims. I am contacting you because I know that you wrote a lot about the north (Yukon, NWT, Nunavut) and articles from those areas are vastly underrepresented.

You may submit articles using this link for convenience. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. <b style="color:#0000FF;">OhanaUnited</b><b style="color:green;">Talk page</b> 17:13, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Kay Tipton
Regarding Draft:Kay_Tipton, I have been trying to gain approval for inclusion, but meeting pushback ("heroic teachers aren't notable"). I have described national-level awards with citations. Biographical data, actionable suggestions, or weighing in on notability would help. The ongoing notability debate is happening at User_talk:Kostas20142. Thank you in advance, Pacingpoet (talk) 21:40, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

 * Thanks. I didn't realise it had been that long. I must be getting old. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:08, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Renew semi on Tenzing Norgay please
Asking this here as you did the actual semi last time - Tenzing Norgay has come off protection a few days ago, and the nationalist circus is already back in town (constant removal of Indian nationality). Could you please re-apply for some time? Cheers! -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 14:57, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
 * . I gave it two weeks. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:05, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

For your viewing pleasure
Inuvik-Tuktoyaktuk Highway. --kelapstick(bainuu) 03:04, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
 * . Nice one. I saw it in this mornings new but never thought about an article. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 03:54, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I am curious if it will be numbered, or become an extension of the Dempster Highway. --kelapstick(bainuu) 04:44, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure about a number but it is supposed to form part of the Mackenzie Valley Highway. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:21, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I was just adding the opening date and I noticed this "with the surface melting leaving". Should it be "with the surface melt leaving"? I'm not sure which version would be more common. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:59, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I added a comma, (with the surface melting, leaving much of the construction under water). Surface melt would be used properly as a noun, but I think using it as a verb would be better. --kelapstick(bainuu) 20:47, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
 * OK. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:54, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Halloween cheer!
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#000; background-color:#FFB924; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

Happy Halloween!

Hello CambridgeBayWeather: Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!   –  North America1000 15:36, 25 October 2017 (UTC) Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Remove Pending changes Protection
Hello, Could you please remove pending changes protection from CGP Grey as the article has been granted indefinite page protection. Thanks, Greg (talk) 08:20, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
 * done. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:03, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2017). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Longhair • Megalibrarygirl • TonyBallioni • Vanamonde93
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Allen3 • Eluchil404 • Arthur Rubin • Bencherlite

Technical news
 * The Wikimedia Foundation's Anti-Harassment Tools team is creating an "Interaction Timeline" tool that intends to assist administrators in resolving user conduct disputes. Feedback on the concept may be posted on the talk page.
 * A new function is now available to edit filter managers that will make it easier to look for multiple strings containing spoofed text.

Arbitration
 * Eligible editors will be invited to submit candidate statements for the 2017 Arbitration Committee Elections starting on November 12 until November 21. Voting will begin on November 27 and last until December 10.
 * Following a request for comment,, and  will serve as the Electoral Commission for the 2017 ArbCom Elections.

Obituaries
 * The Wikipedia community has recently learned that (William Allen Peckham) passed away on December 30, 2016, the same day as . Allen began editing in 2005 and became an administrator that same year.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Patiala Airport for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Patiala Airport is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Patiala Airport until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bingo bro  (Chat)  16:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Ip hopper
Greetings! The ip hopper has been disrupting the language templates again. Can you please have a look? Kind Regards-- Soupforone (talk) 17:47, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
 * . Blocked for 48 hours. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 18:00, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks. The ip is apparently off hopping again . Can you please take a look? Kind Regards-- Soupforone (talk) 14:54, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
 * . Semi-protected them for a month and blocked the IP. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:35, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks. The ip is hopping here too . Kind Regards-- Soupforone (talk) 15:41, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy holidays, by the way! Cheers-- Soupforone (talk) 15:41, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Greetings! The ip has blanked the language markup and origin link-thrus. Could you please keep an eye on this? Kind Regards-- Soupforone (talk) 05:30, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
 * semi-protected for 6 months. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:56, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

EDITS TO BRITISH RADIO CAR ASSOCIATION
Hi

Many thanks for undoing a couple of hours of my work while i try and get the page, semi representive of what the BRCA is, who is running it and where we are based!

We are not a paid company, and all of the edits I actioned are based from our public information, nobody else has ever bothered to update this page in as many years, the last edits were also from myself.

Example is our head quarters, it hasnt been there for around 25 years!

I wasnt aware i was breaking any terms? I believed this place to be a community place where everybody contributes, my actions following my edits was to ask some of our long term racers to come and contribute now i had (read had as its now gone) some form of structure for them to follow and adjust, however thats down the pan unless you can restore it?

I really would like to get this sorted out as i wish to get the page representive are to what we are

Regards

Darren — Preceding unsigned comment added by Secretary-brca (talk • contribs) 22:45, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
 * . None of your edits are completely removed and can be seen in the history, here or here. On Wikipedia a conflict of interest (Plain and simple conflict of interest guide) is not just confined to money matters. It is anything that you have a relationship to. In general, editing with a COI is not forbidden but it is preferred that you make your case on the talk page first. You must let others know, on your talk page or the article talk page, that you are associated with the BRCA. Some of the problems I saw were that Wikipedia doesn't like links to other websites in section headers. They could be used as references at the end of the section. Also there shouldn't be tags in the article like that. The last problem was that you copied directly from the BRCA website. That is a copyright violation and has to be removed. As you must know the BRCA site has "Copyright © 1971-2016 British Radio Car Association [BRCA]. All Rights Reserved." at the page bottom. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:17, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Template:CFS
Hello.

I noticed that you partially reverted my change on CFS. If that's really a title, it should not change depending on date format, should it? And shouldn't the title be in italics, or at least in quotes?

Also, parenthetically, the word "to" makes the template violate WP:Copyedit.

HandsomeFella (talk) 21:18, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I hadn't thought about that but it probably should be in quotes. It's off the front cover and the date changes every 56 days. See File:CanadaFlightSupplement20Jan05.jpg for an example. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:00, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

"Silver Chair" versus "Silver Chair (disambiguation)"
Dear Sir,<BR> You have recently reverted my Move Article of the disambiguation page from Silver Chair to Silver Chair (disambiguation). I feel you have made this revert with little forethought nor regard to the relevant associations with that page. I am not in a position to undo your revert (and doing so would be unwise). I therefor ask that you take a closer look at the intent and impact of the Move Article I initiated.

It began when I attempted to access the Prince Caspian/The Voyage of the Dawn Treader (1989 TV serial) article, but Wikipedia instead dropped me on the The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian article. Initially, I added the TV serial article to the {About} template, but then decided that this further cluttered an already cluttered template. Having realized that the disambiguation Prince Caspian covered the content in the cluttered {About} template, I opted to remove the clutter.

I then proceeded to check the other related articles for this problem, finding the The Voyage of the Dawn Treader (disambiguation) page does not exist and had to leave the The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader {About} template cluttered as is.

When I had reached the The Chronicles of Narnia: The Silver Chair article, I had discovered that the disambiguation page of Silver Chair, was minimally populated compared with its counterparts, and included an Australian rock band Silverchair which had no association with the Narnian franchise other than its similar name.

Thus, in keeping with the article title formatting of most disambiguation pages known to me, and that the Silverchair rock band was also included in the list, this signifies a necessity to change the page name to Silver Chair (disambiguation). This was a very logical and well thought out change, in which I went back and checked for any article I could find that might link to Silver Chair. While you state that the change was "Not necessary", you had not explained your reasoning behind this, nor did you adjust any of the pages which link to Silver Chair (disambiguation), which leads me to believe your revert was simply based on an un-researched whim rather than any logical conclusion.

As I have previously stated, I am not in a position to directly challenge your revert. But I do ask that you at least go back and review the changes made, and if you still feel Move Article is "Not necessary," then I would like to know your thoughts on that position and to reconsider your revert. Most disambiguation pages state so in their article title, and article title formatting should at least be used consistently.<BR> Christopher, Sheridan, OR (talk) 06:39, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * . I was going by Manual of Style/Disambiguation pages and Disambiguation. Both of these say "The title of a disambiguation page is the ambiguous term itself, provided there is no primary topic for that term. If there is a primary topic, then the tag "(disambiguation)" is added to the name of the disambiguation page, as in Jupiter (disambiguation)." Also, WikiProject Disambiguation So you get Arm (disambiguation) because arm is the primary topic but DDB (it's a disambiguation) which has no primary topic. In this case Silver Chair does not appear to have a primary topic so go with the simpler term. Having "Title (disambiguation)" which redirects to "Title" at the top of a page is so that bots (and humans) know that the disambiguation link was done on purpose. It can be done like which can be found at the top of Psychedelic drug. Of course I can't find the instructions for that right now. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:40, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

semi protect
how do i semi protect a section of my wiki page? thanks
 * Do you mean your talk page? I don't see anything there that looks problematic. There is no way to protect a section of any page. It is all or nothing. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:50, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Friend to see you
[Bishzilla, with deceptive mildness:] Is there a problem? [Blows just a puff of radioactive deathray on the little user's hair, making it curl.] <b style="font-family:comic sans ms;font-size:125%;color:#0FF">bishzilla</b> <i style="color:#E0E;font-size:175%;">   ROA R R! !</i> 23:48, 22 November 2017 (UTC).


 * Old CBW has barely any hair left now. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:48, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Please protect Isabel Granada article permanently after December 24th, 2017
Can you protect Isabel Granada artcicle permanently or not?
 * It's best to wait until the protection expires and see if it is still necessary. There is no need to do that now. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:02, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

A page needs protection.
Greetings, sir. The following page is being attacked by an anonymous vandal, who is edit-warring there, removing scholarly sources and numbers from the infobox or changing the numbers to those taken from thin air, all without explanation. Since he comes from different IP addresses, I'm kindly asking you to protect the article for a while. Californian Cat (talk) 16:32, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * . Gave it semi for 4 days. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 16:48, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

ANI Experiences survey
The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:


 * https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2017_AN/Incidents_Survey_Privacy_Statement

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.


 * Sign up here to receive a link to a survey

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 18:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Correction
I have no intention of tampering with the data but made the corrections to put right the abberations in the said article. What I have written is relevant. What was quoted there is incorrect. If u can help me bring out the correct perspective let me know please. Ravenperches (talk) 16:08, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2017). Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Joe Roe
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg JzG
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Ericorbit • Perceval • Thingg • Tristanb • Violetriga

Guideline and policy news
 * Following a request for comment, a new section has been added to the username policy which disallows usernames containing emoji, emoticons or otherwise "decorative" usernames, and usernames that use any non-language symbols. Administrators should discuss issues related to these types of usernames before blocking.

Technical news
 * Wikimedians are now invited to vote on the proposals in the 2017 Community Wishlist Survey on Meta Wiki until 10 December 2017. In particular, there is a section of the survey regarding new tools for administrators and for anti-harassment.
 * A new function is available to edit filter managers which can be used to store matches from regular expressions.

Arbitration
 * Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is open until Sunday 23:59, 10 December 2017 (UTC). There are 12 candidates running for 8 vacant seats.

Miscellaneous
 * Over the last few months, several users have reported backlogs that require administrator attention at WP:ANI, with the most common backlogs showing up on WP:SPI, WP:AIV and WP:RFPP. It is requested that all administrators take some time during this month to help clear backlogs wherever possible. It should be noted that AIV reports are not always valid; however, they still need to be cleared, which may include needing to remind users on what qualifies as vandalism.
 * The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative is conducting a survey for English Wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works (i.e. which problems it deals with well and which problems it struggles with). If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be emailed to you via Special:EmailUser.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:57, 2 December 2017 (UTC)