User:BD2412/Archive 049

{| width="100%" style="border-spacing: 0px"
 * class="MainPageBG" style="border: 1px solid #003350; background-color: #cef2e0; vertical-align:top; text-align: left;"|

FYI
Regarding this. FYI I have been fixing bare URLs for over 6 years. I manage to check each page when I am done and fix the problems that BHG is ignoring. Speaking as someone who has much the same WP:ITIS as she does I understand her desire to rack up as many edits in a day as possible. I also feel that it is worth my time to be as thorough as possible in my work. She does not. I am not posting there due to unpleasant interactions with her in the past. It is likely that this is unpleasant for you to have to read so please feel free to remove it at your discretion and I hope you can forgive my venting on your talk page, but, will certainly understand if you can't. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 21:42, 2 November 2021 (UTC).
 * It is, nonetheless, an arduous task, and a net benefit. BD2412  T 22:31, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I know it is arduous - I've done tens of thousands of them. It is also worth doing them correctly and not causing unnecessary work for others. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 22:36, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Acceptability for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Acceptability is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Acceptability until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Colin M (talk) 04:01, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: I have responded in the discussion. BD2412  T 05:34, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Delete
Can you please delete this per G6:WP:GAN/I#R2.— TheWikiholic (talk) 13:31, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ BD2412  T 16:27, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:38, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Broken table
Can you please help me fix the broken table of the video albums? It would be great if you can. Regards.— TheWikiholic (talk) 19:35, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ BD2412  T 20:18, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Deletion of articles on Wikipedia
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:52, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
 * That's extraordinary. Just when we think we can't be more impressed with, and thankful for a contributor, here you go and put deletion on the mainpage after all. Shouldn't we completely revalue people who "delete" the mainpage? BusterD (talk) 19:45, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
 * theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 05:21, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Hey, thanks! BD2412  T 01:40, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Impersonator
Hello. You recently blocked this account Mohmood20  for a period of 31 hrs but this account needs to be blocked indefinitely as the user is trying to impersonate me and vandalizing pages in trying to jeopardize my account. I believe its the user Aj Indiana who was reported by me for Edit warring and was blocked indefinitely on 5 November 2021. Seems like he created a new account impersonating me in trying to jeopardize my account. Even going as far as redirecting his page to mine. . MehmoodS (talk) 08:49, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Update: Mohmood20 has been blocked indefinitely for impersonation. MehmoodS (talk) 12:39, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Good to hear that this has wrapped itself up. BD2412  T 16:32, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Restoring CSD:G5 articles
Hello BD2412,

I wanted to ask if you could explain the reasoning behind the restoration of G5-deleted pages Antonio F. Díaz and Anacleto Medina‎. You wrote: "G5 is not a suicide pact". Could you explain what that means? Additionally, could you explain why you chose to restore the pages unilaterally, instead of going through the DRV process? Thanks, Pilaz (talk) 18:01, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I am in the midst of a months-long project to create disambiguation pages for similarly-named generals, and these articles are on my lists; it is necessary to have them so that the most complete set of potentially ambiguous meanings can be provided to readers who come across an unexpanded reference to such a person (i.e. a source that says that "General Foo" did something without specifying which "General Foo"). G5 is not a mandatory basis for deletion. It is a permissive basis, but not a requirement, and should be used with discretion rather than as a mindless exercise. It does the encyclopedia no good to delete neutrally written articles on qualifying subjects, and it does me no good to have red links on disambiguation pages. As for the DRV process, what would be the point of asking myself on a message board to restore a page, and then granting myself that request there? BD2412  T 18:28, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the explanation and for shedding light on your current work. As for G5, you are right to remind that deletion is a may rather than a must, but as you'll surely have noticed I have only used G5 for biographies lacking credible claims or coverage justifying notability. I've kept all the officeholders susceptible of passing WP:NPOL and other major figures passing other SNGs. The reason for this is because I was going to submit them all those failing the GNG to AfD anyway, and I am confident that all but a few would have been deleted. All were created by a blocked user attempting to make Wikipedia their personal genealogy website (SPI), which is not what Wikipedia is about, and who used Google Books to refbomb their original research with namechecks (at best). G5 also has deterrent value, and we on Wikipedia get to decide what to keep and what to delete. With respect to General Díaz (who qualifies for NPOL), I applied WP:TNT based on this essay. As for DRV, I'm going to apply the same philosophy as you did for G5: just because you can avoid going through DRV doesn't mean you must. And unlike DRV, unless I am mistaken, there is nothing that explicitly allows you do so unilaterally, so DRV should have been the preferred venue regardless. Besides, Wikipedia is based on consensus, and as an administrator you have a duty of accountability to the rest of Wikipedia, and not hide under cryptic explanations such as "G5 isn't a suicide pact" . With that being said, I wish you the best in your disambiguation work. Pilaz (talk) 19:51, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I do appreciate your efforts and your motivations. While the identified sockpuppet may have had less noble motivations, I would strongly prefer that deficient articles be tagged for their deficiencies first, and materials worthy of inclusion in the encyclopedia be kept to the greatest extent possible. BD2412  T 20:48, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for letting me know, I actually hadn't thought about tagging said deficiencies before going through G5. I'll try my best to apply your recommendations in the future. Pilaz (talk) 23:55, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Also, just a heads up: there is a chance I may nominate Anacleto Medina for deletion after I run a deep search for sources this week. I'll be sure to ping you if I do. Pilaz (talk) 23:59, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
 * As for the DRV process, what would be the point of asking myself on a message board to restore a page, and then granting myself that request there? Well yes, but it's a widely accepted norm that an editor involved in a discussion (including the nominator) should not close that discussion. I do think it would have been prudent to either discuss undeletion with the admin who originally performed the deletion(s) or open a DRV discussion (to be closed by an uninvolved admin). Colin M (talk) 21:41, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I would agree with that, but I was not involved in the discussion in any capacity (nor does it appear that there was any actual discussion). I merely noticed the red links after the fact. BD2412  T 22:26, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
 * What I mean is that if you were to open a DRV discussion, then you would be involved in that discussion, hence why it wouldn't make sense for you to close said discussion. Colin M (talk) 23:22, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Hyam Maccoby
I translated into Hebrew, thanks !!! המאו&#34;ר (talk) 13:43, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Interesting. I don't know why I'm being told of this, as I only made one gnoming edit to the article. BD2412  T 15:11, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Anusha Rai
Hello sir, thnk you for keeping page in draft. I saw a new review in Cinema Express after film come back on Kannada OTT. Now thr are 2 reviews. I think it makes Anusha rai actor notable now. Mahanubhavaru is already there. And Karshanam has two reviews,. Please help. Ntkn769 (talk) 13:56, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Thus far it appears that most editors involved with this article are sockpuppets with an undisclosed interest. I will presume the same of you as well. BD2412  T 15:09, 10 November 2021 (UTC)


 * No sir BD2412 . Idon't know how to give you proof...but I am not involved with any. I told before also, I am a big fan of Anusha and would lyk to see her page on Wikipedia. is it conflict of interest? i read about that too. if you thnk it is that, i can put tag for coi on my page. if it helps i mean. pls suggest Ntkn769 (talk) 13:38, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Being a fan does not constitute a COI. I would suggest adding whatever sources you want to add to the article and then submitting it through the regular WP:AFC review process. I see no reason to deviate from that process here. BD2412  T 15:36, 11 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Okay sir, I did what you said..Ntkn769 (talk) 13:16, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Bare URL
Can you please help me expand the remaining bare URL in this article? Especially ref numbers 114,115, 123, 136. Thanks in advance.— TheWikiholic (talk) 14:39, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, there is a challenge. BD2412  T 18:44, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

 * Noted. BD2412  T 00:08, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Would it be inappropriate for me to close the Bulbul Statue AfD?
Hi! I saw that you were involved in the AfD related to the Bulbul Statue. I was lurking through AfD and saw that it was still open, but after reading the page I believe there is a) clear consensus the subject does not merit a stand-alone article, and within that b) there is consensus to merge to the Bulbul article. I'm wondering if it is appropriate for non-admins to make closures regarding merging from an article to another. If that is the case, I'll close the discussion on Saturday since it seems discussion on the AfD has stabilized since the 20th. Santacruz &#8258;  Please tag me!  13:13, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Although it sounds reasonable, WP:NACAFD appears to limit non-admin AfD closures to clear keep votes. BD2412  T 18:07, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Justin Bieber
Hello, BD2412, I have a question. Does this consensus also pertain to infobox? It is clear that it strictly only refers to the lede. Justin Bieber has 220 songwriting credits, and addition to the infobox is therefore justified. For that reason, I’ve made this bold edit:. Israell (talk) 06:33, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Phoenix magazine
It might be a bit of a stretch, but do you see any additional sources for Draft:Phoenix (wargaming magazine)? BOZ (talk) 05:57, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't see anything substantial offhand, and would actually suggest making this a section of Simulations Publications, Inc., with a section redirect pointing there. That provides a place for additional sources to be added if any are found, until the section becomes substantial enough to break out into an article. BD2412  T 06:39, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Copyvios
Can you please tell me how to fix the cases where the reference has been copied text from Wikipedia?. TheWikiholic (talk) 17:30, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't think there is anything to be "fixed" in those cases. It seems to just be informational, so the next reviewer to come along understands that this is not a case of Wikipedia being the copyist. BD2412  T 17:32, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Abuse of administrator's privileges -- abuse of power
You provide no evidence that I have abused my editing privileges. Apparently, you have chosen to take a certain editor's side when it comes to reverts. One need only look at the history of reverts to see your bias. BrandonTRA (talk) 19:13, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Your edit history on that article is blatantly sufficient. Deleting warnings doesn't mean they are not part of the record. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  19:27, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Barsby
You closed Talk:Barsby, Leicestershire as "No consensus to move" with the comment "there is a clear absence of consensus for the proposed move at this time". This however was a discussion to move back to the long-standing base name title which it was at from its creation in 2007 until the undiscussed move 2 days before the discussion started per WP:RMNOMIN "if an article is created at Soda can and stays there for years prior to being WP:BOLDly moved to pop can, and a move request is filed leading to a decision of "no consensus", the article must be moved back to its longstanding title". It was originally filed under "Requests to revert undiscussed moves" but I stated that having no primary topic was also an option. ! editor supported the move being reverted, 1 editor suggested nether the village or surname was primary, 1 editor suggested just having a DAB with no surname article and 1 editor suggested keeping the surname at the base name. I'm not seeing a consensus for the undiscussed primary topic swap.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 09:23, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Your analysis is correct, but no one said anything about this in the discussion. I have restored the status quo ante. BD2412  T 19:12, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, there were indeed reasonable arguments on both sides and the issue can probably be revisited some time (with pageviews for the surname v village) but for now its a WP:2DABS situation anyway so those looking for the surname still only have 1 click from the place it was named after.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 21:43, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Ceylonese
Hi, I noticed that you recently changed a number of links from Ceylonese, a dab page, to Ceylonese. I don't think Demographics of Sri Lanka is appropriate. Ceylonese would be more appropriate as Ceylon redirects to Sri Lanka and in most instances that is the meaning of Ceylonese.--Obi2canibe (talk) 16:36, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Most of the instances that I changed referred to Ceylonese people, which has itself been a redirect to Demographics of Sri Lanka for over ten years. These edits were therefore merely restoring what was already the redirect target for the term in these articles. BD2412  T 19:16, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)


 * ✅, cheers! BD2412  T 20:43, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lists of Australian rules football leagues (disambiguation)


A tag has been placed on Lists of Australian rules football leagues (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"It may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion under CSD"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.

P.S.
Any idea why (what I think is) the correct  results in ==Your draft article, Lists of Australian rules football leagues (disambiguation)==

Hello, BD2412. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lists of Australian rules football leagues".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! ? Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:01, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 * This is a recently enacted basis for deletion, so perhaps the template has just not been created yet. I deleted the page as G6 (routine housekeeping). BD2412  T 19:04, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Wikiquote
I have closed your request to create WikiProject Wikiquote as successful with and  as initial members. Feel free to adjust and remake the WikiProject page as you see fit. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 19:22, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Excellent. I have added some ideas to the empty sections. BD2412  T 19:33, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi
Hello  how are you? , can you help me to review this article please and if it is ok move it to main spcae thank you --Wikipedian Loves Editing (talk) 06:36, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * As I do not speak Turkish, I am unable to evaluate the sources. Moreover, I have found that when I am solicited by a new editor to review a draft, it is generally part of some improper activity. BD2412  T 06:40, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * sorry for this issue ,But there is news in these pages about Article " turkish well-known sites" according Alexa and this famous Turkish news site covered the site Ensonhaber and Google News T54.com.tr Buyuksivas.com and https://muckrack.com/media-outlet/ortadoguhaberleri and you can use google translate as you like and I ask you about the format of the article as well and if it is encyclopedic and appropriate also registered as an independent media platform in the State of Qatar at the Ministry of Economy and Commerce --Wikipedian Loves Editing (talk) 06:52, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * It is outside of my area of comfort. I am suspicious, however, that your first edit is a fully-formatted article. Have you previously edited Wikipedia under another username? BD2412  T 07:04, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes I made some edits but I don't remember my other account in some articles related to Turkey, Can you make some appropriate edits or move the article to the main space Thank you and stay safe --Wikipedian Loves Editing (talk) 07:14, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * What edits did you make under your other account? BD2412  T 07:15, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Perhaps in some articles related to Turkish politicians and Turkish cities, I don't remember the account at all ,Because I'm busy with my PhD --Wikipedian Loves Editing (talk) 07:43, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * If you can remember which articles and edits let me know. I need to evaluate that information before I proceed with anything. BD2412  T 07:48, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Modifications may be here Süleyman Soylu Osman Nuri Kabaktepe Vedat Demiröz --Wikipedian Loves Editing (talk) 07:53, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * You previously edited as User:Aliaboomar? BD2412  T 07:56, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * No I dont think --Wikipedian Loves Editing (talk) 07:57, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Only three editors have edited Vedat Demiröz, and I know the other two, so that leaves User:Aliaboomar. I think that is you. BD2412  T 07:59, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * What is the problem now my friend? --Wikipedian Loves Editing (talk) 08:01, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Yup. Looking at other accounts at Sockpuppet_investigations/علي_أبو_عمر this is clearly the same person. Blocked. Thanks. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 09:14, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Getting a sock to tell on themselves is a pro move, BD2412. I applaud your patience. clpo13(talk) 09:18, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Frankly, it was an entertaining distraction. BD2412  T 18:53, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Indeed well played. I pushed the button, but the credit goes to you. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 23:19, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Keith Poulter
Do you know of any sources to help get Draft:Keith Poulter back to article space? BOZ (talk) 04:06, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Nothing offhand, I'm afraid. BD2412  T 04:17, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Another editor did some expansion so that is a big improvement. :) BOZ (talk) 13:19, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

RM close
This (Beyond the fact that I must notice that you, like Mathsci, are following me around) is nonsense, per WP:NOTBURO: having a separate discussion to disambiguate is only a waste of time, and if the only argument people have against the move is "it should be reverted because it was undiscussed" (and for the most of them, that was their only argument), then that's nothing more than a self-fulfilling prophecy and circular reasoning. The only reason I'm not taking to move review is because it's faster to open a new one. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 15:14, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I am not "following you around". I have a personal rule that when I initiate a new RM, I close one in the backlog. Since I had just created Talk:James Watson (soldier), I looked for a discussion in the backlog that was ripe for closing, and picked this one because the outcome was so straightforward. The burden of gaining consensus for a page move is on the editor proposing the move, even if that consensus is sought after the fact. There was not consensus for the original move, and it was never going to manifest in that discussion. It is a core policy of Wikipedia that in the absence of consensus where consensus is required, the situation is restored to the status quo ante. Please bear in mind that there is no WP:DEADLINE; it is worth it to take the time to do things right. I could have boldly moved James Watson (soldier) rather than initiating a discussion, but by going through the process we reach a more certain and enduring outcome. BD2412  T 19:35, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Tony Bobulinski


Hello, BD2412. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tony Bobulinski".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:00, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the notice, and happy new year! BD2412  T 19:08, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Category:Anti-vaccination activist deaths from the COVID-19 pandemic has been nominated for deletion
Category:Anti-vaccination activist deaths from the COVID-19 pandemic has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:27, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Happy New Year, BD2412!


Happy New Year! BD2412, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Abishe (talk) 14:10, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.


 * Excellent. BD2412  T 17:57, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Matt Murdock draft
Happy New Year, B2412! Other than that, I've fully cleaned up the Matt Murdock draft to satisfy some notability. Is there any issues that need to be fixed before potentially moving it to the mainspace? Thanks, SirDot (talk) 21:42, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matt Murdock (Marvel Cinematic Universe) has been accepted
 Matt Murdock (Marvel Cinematic Universe), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Matt_Murdock_(Marvel_Cinematic_Universe) help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! BD2412 T 21:48, 31 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the move, ! Appreciate it. — SirDot (talk) 21:55, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 * No problem, looks good! BD2412  T 21:56, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I think we only need an image for the Infobox. — SirDot (talk) 22:25, 31 December 2021 (UTC)