User talk:Daniel Case/Archive 23 6/26/2019-12/13/2021

Your GA nomination of Aja (song)
The article Aja (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Aja (song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 18:41, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

DYK for FM Non-Duplication Rule
Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited FM Non-Duplication Rule, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WQXR ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/FM_Non-Duplication_Rule check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/FM_Non-Duplication_Rule?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:51, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Aja (song)
The article Aja (song) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Aja (song) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 19:21, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Talk page revdel
Hi, why did you revdel most of my talk page? Is it possible for you to undo this action? SportingFlyer  T · C  22:30, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I really can't discuss it, at least not publicly. Daniel Case (talk) 02:29, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Is there a way I can contact you privately? Never had to do this on Wikipedia before. SportingFlyer  T · C  03:11, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Use the "email this user" link on the left side of the page. Or, on my user page, click on "email" in the "this user can be reached by email" box at the top right. Daniel Case (talk) 05:02, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Woohoo
 Happy Adminship Anniversary! Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!

Best wishes, Mjs1991 (talk) 03:41, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

"Aja"
I did honestly feel a little sad failing the article after all of your hard work, but if it has been improved on by the future then I will be open to reviewing "Aja" again! --Kyle Peake (talk) 08:11, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Sunday July 14: Annual NYC Wiki-Picnic @ Roosevelt Island
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Schoharie
I wanted to thank you for this, that was very reasonable of you. Since the closer chose not to address the question, I expected a dispute over process there (I'm still not ruling out that possibility).But it seems to me you removed too much, since the consensus did not apply to the paragraph preceding the list and the section heading. That said, I'm not feeling inclined to restore that; I'll leave it up to you and others for the time being. Cheers,― Mandruss  &#9742;  00:03, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Lenox Hill, and other parts of the Upper East Side
From what I've seen in the geotags, that part of the Upper East Side where the Barbara Rutherford Hatch House is specifically part of Lenox Hill (https://www.google.com/maps/place/Lenox+Hill,+New+York,+NY/@40.7672202,-73.9699338,2714m/data=!3m2!1e3!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x89c258c22817f429:0xfcbc13daafb82d31!8m2!3d40.7662314!4d-73.9602318?hl=en). I'd love to place other sites in more specific locations as well. -User:DanTD (talk) 04:35, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * OK, then, I'd start with Barbizon Hotel for Women and Treadwell Farm Historic District, both of which are nearby and fit within the definition. Daniel Case (talk) 13:59, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Cool. I was almost ready to include the Henry Clay Frick House in Museum Mile, but apparently, that's a little too far south. -User:DanTD (talk) 14:12, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Good article reassessment
Hi, Daniel Case, do you know why the article history template will not appear properly on this page?. Do you have any ideas on what I could do to fix this?StoryKai (talk) 07:15, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:JD Salinger.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:JD Salinger.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

DYK for 2008 Universal fire
Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Barry Sherman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Barry_Sherman check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Barry_Sherman?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

New York Highway Userbox
I tried to create a userbox for percentage of NYS Routes clinched. I think many users can use the userbox. I figured you may want to use it and was wondering if you could help me get it looking and working properly? Here it is below:

Thanks 420Traveler (talk) 12:15, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:48, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Register of Historic Places listings in Manhattan above 110th Street, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Second Empire ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/National_Register_of_Historic_Places_listings_in_Manhattan_above_110th_Street check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/National_Register_of_Historic_Places_listings_in_Manhattan_above_110th_Street?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:05, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Disappearance of Toni Sharpless
Hello! Your submission of Disappearance of Toni Sharpless at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 20:02, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Disappearance of Toni Sharpless
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

My email of yesterday
Hi! The problem I mentioned yesterday seems to be continuing to some extent – thought this would the quickest way of drawing your attention to it. Regards, thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:19, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

August 28: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC (+editathons before and after)
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Your most recent suppression
About the suppression you performed at 14:20, 30 August 2019; I've delete-suppressed the whole page. The edits you removed had personal information, but as far as I could see, the whole thing was minor self-disclosure also...unless I'm missing some reason it shouldn't be suppressed? Vanamonde (Talk) 03:04, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

You've got mail!
—— SerialNumber  54129  05:26, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Translation request
Hello, i would be very grateful if you could translate Афганский поход Красной армии (1929) to english. This conflict is woefully under-represented in English literature. Koopinator (talk) 13:29, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Saturday Sept 7: Met Fashion Edit-a-thon @ Metropolitan Museum of Art
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Disambiguation link notification for September 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The woman who made up her mind, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Better Together ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/The_woman_who_made_up_her_mind check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/The_woman_who_made_up_her_mind?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:16, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

NoSleep Podcast episode inspired by Elisa Lam
I saw you removed a mention of a NoSleep Podcast episode from the article Death of Elisa Lam. I agree with your reasoning for removing it. I thought you might want to know that the same user added the same thing to Cecil Hotel (Los Angeles), and you might want to remove it from there as well. Before I saw it had been added to and removed from the former article, I saw it still there in the latter article and improved it somewhat, and then the person who originally added it improved it a bit more, but it's still not really worth including (being even less relevant in that article), so I don't mind if you remove it. – PointyOintment ❬💬•⌨❭ 06:08, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Register of Historic Places listings in Montgomery County, New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palatine German ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/National_Register_of_Historic_Places_listings_in_Montgomery_County%2C_New_York check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/National_Register_of_Historic_Places_listings_in_Montgomery_County%2C_New_York?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:02, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

DYK for The woman who made up her mind
valereee (talk) 12:01, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Disappearance of Rebecca Coriam
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Disappearance of Rebecca Coriam you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 18:01, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Disappearance of Rebecca Coriam
The article Disappearance of Rebecca Coriam you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Disappearance of Rebecca Coriam for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mujinga -- Mujinga (talk) 20:42, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Open-fields doctrine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oliver Wendell Holmes ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Open-fields_doctrine check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Open-fields_doctrine?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:26, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

YGM
&mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 03:14, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Sept 25: WikiWednesday Salon NYC
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Disambiguation link notification for September 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Open-fields doctrine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page De novo ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Open-fields_doctrine check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Open-fields_doctrine?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:38, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Bobby Donati
Can you move Robert Donati to Bobby Donati? I certainly believe Bobby is overwhelmingly the WP:COMMONNAME here. TarkusAB talk / contrib 21:07, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Raihan Merchant at COIN
Hi. So that I know for next time, was my report on the Raihan Merchant draft at COIN too close to outing? I see it has been suppressed. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:10, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Open-fields doctrine, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Burden of proof and Fatal error ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Open-fields_doctrine check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Open-fields_doctrine?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:24, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Global watchlist - Update 1
 Updates associated with DannyS712's Global watchlist script:


 * General announcements
 * Management has migrated to phabricator; to report a bug or request a feature, please create a new task with the script's tag
 * Message translation has been reduced; for common messages that are already translated in mediawiki core, the system translations are used, in order to reduce duplication of efforts


 * Recent additions
 * New pages are shown at the start of a site's feed
 * Log entries are shown at the end of a site's feed
 * Basic validation has been added to user settings, applied before saving
 * Site validation has also been added; a site (excluding unique projects like wikidata, meta, commons, etc.) is considered to be valid if it is the form of "language.project", where both the language code and project name are valid. It does not, however, check that the actual site is valid; only that it could be. In other words, even though  refers to a site that doesn't exist, it is considered valid, because   is a valid language code (  is a working site) and   is a valid project.


 * Announcements
 * BREAKING CHANGE: Backwards compatibility supporting the use of sites as  (like 'en.wikipedia.org' or 'meta.wikimedia.org'), deprecated in version 1.7.5, will be removed soon; all sites should now be saved as   (like 'de.wikinews' or 'fr.wikisource')
 * BREAKING CHANGE: Storing user sites as, deprecated in version version 1.11.11, will be removed soon; all settings should be stored in the   object
 * Both of these breaking changes will be implemented alongside version 4.0; until then, any use of the config page (m:Special:BlankPage/GlobalWatchlistConfig) will result in saving settings in the newest format

Version 4.0 should be released in around a week. It will include the new features mentioned above, as well as removal of backwards compatibility for settings and sites.
 * Next release

I've sent this first message to users that participated in the discussion at m:Community Wishlist Survey 2019/Watchlists/Revive Crosswatch tool or otherwise shown interest in the script. To subscribe or unsubscribe from future updates, see the distribution list.

Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 16:03, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Global watchlist user script: About •&#32; Updates •&#32; Code

Unsolved murder?
Hi Daniel, can you please tell me is this person Oto Iskandar di Nata's murder case is unsolved or not? Even though he was seen to be killed, I don't think people knew the names of his killers, or if they charged. Davidgoodheart (talk) 03:30, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge third anniversary
The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada is approaching its third-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and have no unsourced claims.

You may use the above button to submit entries, or bookmark this link for convenience. For more information, please see WP:CAN10K. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 12:38, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

2019 US Banknote Contest
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)

Discussion at Articles for deletion/Waterman–Smith Building
You are invited to join the discussion at Articles for deletion/Waterman–Smith Building. BigDwiki (talk) 17:27, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Oct 23: WikiWednesday Salon NYC
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Orphaned non-free image File:Box Office Mojo screenshot.png
Thanks for uploading File:Box Office Mojo screenshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Global watchlist - Update 2
 Updates associated with DannyS712's Global watchlist script:


 * General notes
 * To report a bug or request a feature, please create a new task on Phabricator with the script's tag


 * Recent additions
 * Site validation has been tightened. Previously, only the language code and project name had to be valid - now, they must be a valid combination (i.e.  exists, and so is valid, but   is not valid, because no such wiki exists).
 * When the global watchlist feed is loading, an OOUI widget will be shown, rather than an animated gif.
 * An option has been added to no longer group edits to the same page. For now, this isn't very useful, since metadata for the edits (editor, summary, tags, etc.) are not yet shown, but they will be soon. Until then, ungrouped edits are treated the same as pages with only 1 edit - the minor and bot flags are displayed if applicable. If edits are grouped, the minor and bot flags are only shown if they apply to all of the edits.


 * Upcoming changes
 * Starting with version 5.0, there will be an option at the settings page to switch to and from a "stable" version of the script. When activated, the script import in your global.js should be replaced, and then the page refreshed with the new script loaded. The stable script will live at m:User:DannyS712/Global watchlist/stable.js, and will be updated with each full release. Otherwise, it shouldn't be edited, providing a version that is less prone to bugs as the script is developed.


 * Announcements
 * WARNING: Starting with version 5.1, the option to mark the pages of a site as seen be implemented using the  API option, rather than manually listing the titles. This is being done to simplify the implementation code. This will result in the same functionality as marking all pages as seen via Special:Watchlist (i.e. even if the page isn't visible due to your filter choices, it will still be marked as seen). If you would like to keep using the current method for a while, please switch to the stable branch.

Version 5.0 has just gone live. It includes the new features mentioned above.
 * Next release

To subscribe or unsubscribe from future updates, see the distribution list.

Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 22:43, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Global watchlist user script: About •&#32; Updates •&#32; Code

Your GA nomination of Lloyd L. Gaines
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lloyd L. Gaines you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Fiamh -- Fiamh (talk) 02:40, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process
Hello!

The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.

Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.

The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.

Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Saturday Nov 16: Wikipedia Asian Month Edit-a-thon @ Metropolitan Museum of Art
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

A kitten for you!
You are most welcome sir.

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:34, 17 November 2019 (UTC) 

Unsolved murder?
Is this an unsolved murder or not? Philip Mangano was said to be murdered under the orders of Albert Anastasia, but was Anastasia not charged with his murder. Davidgoodheart (talk) 00:11, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Nov 20: WikiWednesday Salon NYC
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Global watchlist - Update 3
 Updates associated with DannyS712's Global watchlist script:


 * Survey
 * I am investigating adding more context to each entry that is shown (such as the edit summaries, tags, patrol marks, the user who made the edit, etc.). Is there any desire for such additions? If so, what should be added first, and what is a low priority? Please leave feedback on the relevant phabricator task, T238300.


 * Recent additions
 * Site validation has been overhauled. Rather than hard-coding a list of valid sites, users will be able to watch any site where they have an attached local user account. If a site is rejected as invalid, please ensure that there is indeed a local account attached to your global account.
 * Users will now be alerted regarding the results of attempting to update their settings.
 * Live updates have been added - when activated, the script will refresh in the background, and then load the new feed, every 7.5 seconds. In the future, this frequency may be configurable.
 * OOUI icons have been added to most buttons.
 * There is now an option to eliminate the confirmation dialog when marking all sites as seen.


 * Announcements
 * WARNING: Starting with version 6.1, site aliases currently used when saving settings will be removed, and only sites in the form of `lang.project` will be accepted.
 * As noted in the last update, marking a site as seen now uses, which means that any changes to watched pages between when the watchlist was loaded and when the site was "marked as seen" may be ignored.

Version 6.0 was just finalized for the development and stable branches of the script.
 * Next release

To subscribe or unsubscribe from future updates, see the distribution list.

Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 21:03, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Global watchlist user script: About •&#32; Updates •&#32; Code

Your GA nomination of Lloyd L. Gaines
The article Lloyd L. Gaines you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lloyd L. Gaines for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Fiamh -- Fiamh (talk) 08:21, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Disappearance of Steven Koecher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KSL ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Disappearance_of_Steven_Koecher check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Disappearance_of_Steven_Koecher?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:38, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Disappearance of Steven Koecher
Hello! Your submission of Disappearance of Steven Koecher at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 14:52, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Disappearance of Steven Koecher
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 07:09, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Просьба
Здравствуйте! Хочу попросить у вас о помощи. У меня возник спор в статье Shamil, 3rd Imam of Dagestan по поводу некоторых источников. Но для того, чтобы решить этот вопрос и объяснить коллегам суть проблемы у меня не хватает знаний английского языка. Прошу именно вас, так как у вас на странице указано, что вы хорошо владеете русским языком. Вы мне не поможете? — Хаджимурад (talk) 18:34, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
 * , I have protected Shamil, 3rd Imam of Dagestan again, this time for two weeks. You cannot reverse changes repeatedly. If you continue, you will likely end up blocked again. SQL Query me!  19:38, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
 * , уважаемый, вы нисколько не разобрались в моём вопросе. В указанной статье указано, что Шамиль происходил из аварской статье кумыкского происхождения. Но в каком источнике написано, что его семья имела кумыкское происхождение? Вы мне поясните, пожалуйста, этот момент. Что касается источника, где он называет себя татарином. Этот момент я вам также пояснял. "Татарин" в старом русском языке это прежде всего "мусульманин", "азиат". Так раньше называли вообще всех мусульман России, поэтому к кумыкам этот термин не имеет отношения. — Хаджимурад (talk) 10:55, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Global watchlist - Update 4
 Updates associated with DannyS712's Global watchlist script:


 * Recent additions
 * A new "fast" mode has been introduced. When used, the watchlist serves as just a list of pages that have been modified, and no longer includes context about the edits themselves.
 * More information has been added to entries. When edits are not grouped by page, or when there is only 1 edit to a page, minor and bot flags are shown, as well as the user who made the edit, the summary used, and any tags that were applied. When multiple entries are grouped, bot and minor flags are only shown if all of the grouped edits were made by bots or where marked as minor. If only 1 user edited the page, that user's name is still shown, but no summaries or tags are included.
 * All watchlists are now fetched in parallel, rather than in series, greatly reducing load time.


 * Technical notes
 * Most of the source code is now annotated with jsdoc notes, allowing others to more clearly understand and review the code.
 * I will be looking into creating guidelines to let others contribute to the script; see T238298.


 * Translations
 * There is now proper qqq documentation for translations. Translation takes place at m:User:DannyS712/Global watchlist/Translate, and help is appreciated.
 * Newly translated messages are added to the script when I notice them; if you have translated messages that aren't showing up, please let me know at m:User talk:DannyS712.

Version 7.0 was just finalized for the development and stable branches of the script.
 * Next release

To subscribe or unsubscribe from future updates, see the distribution list.

Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 04:37, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Global watchlist user script: About •&#32; Updates •&#32; Code

NY 55 and NY 52
Unfortunately we got shot down on our GANs, which i think was against wikipedia guidelines. But anywats lets fix whatever was bothering Mitch and then you can nominate them again. Let me know what i can do. 420Traveler (talk) 15:39, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Oversight
I have found a privacy leak of a minor. I don’t have an email to contact Oversight. What should I do? E Super Maker (😲 shout) 20:58, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
 * , You can pop in to IRC, and say !oversight (or if no one answers there, try saying !admin ), and we'll get it sorted one way or another. SQL Query me!  22:07, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Dec 18: WikiWednesday Salon NYC
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

84 exits
The problem is the "old exit" part does not belong in the articles of the other roads, just in the exit lists of the ones that matter. Mitch 32 (Fame is a four letter word.) 03:27, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited View of Auvers-sur-Oise, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kunsthaus ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/View_of_Auvers-sur-Oise check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/View_of_Auvers-sur-Oise?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:06, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

View of Auvers-sur-Oise DYK
Hello, Just to let you know that this is scheduled for Jan. 1, as requested (viz., special holding area). Regards,  JGHowes   talk  20:08, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy Holidays
Wishing you and all your loved ones a happy and healthy holiday season and 2020. Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 21:31, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Good luck
 豊かな十年へようこそ/WELCOME TO THE D20s Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune. このミラPはDaniel Caseたちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます！ フレフレ、みんなの未来！/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE! ミラP 03:23, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Murder of Artemus Ogletree, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Switchboard and Comatose ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Murder_of_Artemus_Ogletree check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Murder_of_Artemus_Ogletree?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Anonymous user is label bombing
Hi, you’re an administrator right? Well, a user (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/108.21.182.146) is label bombing dozens of articles, and reverting efforts to restore the articles back. The worst example is the Taconic State Parkway where he/she added 532 characters worth of citation needed labels for no reason.

Thanks! Smith0124 (talk) 00:50, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:07, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

DYK for View of Auvers-sur-Oise
Gatoclass (talk) 12:01, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Invitation to the 2020 WikiCup
Happy New Year, Happy New Decade and Happy New WikiCup! The 2020 WikiCup began at the start of January and all article creators, expanders and improvers are welcome to take part. If you are interested in joining, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Creative editors like yourself seem to enjoy taking part, and many return year after year. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup are, , and Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:35, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Murder of Artemus Ogletree
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!
 Happy First Edit Day! Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:07, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society
Dear ,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. ​

Best regards, Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 16:51, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Picture of the day
Greetings!

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File: is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on January 20, 2020. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2020-01-20. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:43, 7 January 2020 (UTC) .

Disambiguation link notification for January 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anania Shirakatsi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ananias ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Anania_Shirakatsi check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Anania_Shirakatsi?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Jan 22: WikiWednesday Salon NYC
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

You've got mail!
S0091 (talk) 20:22, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Block of Murrow
Hello; I certainly don't expect you to remember the details of your block of this user, but I didn't know if you would be willing to just add your eyes to it and make sure I haven't missed anything before I would remove it. Thanks 331dot (talk) 01:23, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Saturday Jan 25: Met 'Understanding America' Edit-a-thon @ Metropolitan Museum of Art
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Death of Elisa Lam
"Again, this is not a notable band, therefore this information isn't notable" I am interested to know when you feel a band/artist becomes "notable". The criteria for notability seems a little mysterious. Does an artist require their own Wikipedia page to be notable? Or are you more interested in their Spotify listen count? I'm genuinely interested here, as the vagueness of the undo makes it a little hard to work out when adding information is worthwhile, and when I should keep it to myself. Many thanks, Simon j parker (talk) 05:54, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

New York State Route 52
I see that NY 52 originally ran along Dupont Ave according to the Topo map from that time, but then it says that South Street (New York State Route 980P) was a former routing. Do you know whether it was switched from Dupont Ave to South Street then to Interstate 84? Thanks 420Traveler (talk) 20:04, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Global watchlist - Update 5
 Updates associated with DannyS712's Global watchlist script:


 * Future development
 * I have requested a grant to fund conversion of this script into an extension, as well as further development. Please see m:Grants:Project/Create a global watchlist extension.
 * If anyone is interested in reviewing the code and making suggestions regarding coding style, techniques, or something else, please let me know. See T234507 for more.


 * Recent additions
 * I have added basic tests for the script, so bugs should be less likely to make their way to the deployed versions of the script (both the unstable development version, and the stable release version).
 * If there is an error with the script, the user will be notified and and the console will include a stack trace of the issue.


 * Translations
 * Many thanks to those that have contributed translations for the script's messages. Translation takes place at m:User:DannyS712/Global watchlist/Translate, and help is appreciated.
 * Newly translated messages are added to the script when I notice them; if you have translated messages that aren't showing up, please let me know at m:User talk:DannyS712.


 * Next release
 * Version 8.0 was just finalized for the development and stable branches of the script.

To subscribe or unsubscribe from future updates, see the distribution list.

Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 18:25, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Global watchlist user script: About •&#32; Updates •&#32; Code

Hello
Hi there, I just recently joined the WikiProjects for New York State and the Hudson Valley!! I'd love to collaborate!!!--TheTexasNationalist99 (talk) 17:40, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lake Wylie, South Carolina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moratorium ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Lake_Wylie%2C_South_Carolina check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Lake_Wylie%2C_South_Carolina?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:21, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Geetha Angara homicide
Gatoclass (talk) 12:01, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Death of Michael Rosenblum
— Maile (talk) 12:01, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Feb 19: WikiWednesday Salon NYC
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

NY 28A
I see you were a main creator of this article, I believe its ready to be a final article. Would you assist me in nominating the page to FA status? 420Traveler (talk) 19:01, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject Backpacking
Please consider returning to the project. —philoserf (talk) 02:02, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 coronavirus pandemic in New York (state), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mohawk, New York ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/2020_coronavirus_pandemic_in_New_York_%28state%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/2020_coronavirus_pandemic_in_New_York_%28state%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:34, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

March 18: First ever ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Changes to Oversight team
Upon request to the Arbitration Committee, has voluntarily relinquished the Oversight permission. The committee extends its sincere thanks to Daniel for his long service as a functionary.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Katietalk 22:57, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard

Disambiguation link notification for March 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Schoharie limousine crash, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WNYT ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Schoharie_limousine_crash check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Schoharie_limousine_crash?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:17, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * (Clarification: I just received the administrators' newsletter, which contained a notice about this. The date and the widespread April Fools sillyness today has nothing to do with this.) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:17, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I know you meant it sincerely ... happy (such as it can be) April Fool's, and stay healthy! Daniel Case (talk) 21:21, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 coronavirus pandemic in New York (state), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Fork ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/2020_coronavirus_pandemic_in_New_York_%28state%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/2020_coronavirus_pandemic_in_New_York_%28state%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:17, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

NY 5S
Im trying to research when the new section between Frankfort and Mohawk was completed? It says by 1992 in the article. I have looked at all maps on Rumseys and cant find anything. I was wondering if you know any extra places to look or how I may be able to find the source? If not no problem, Thanks, 420Traveler (talk) 07:47, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Esopus Creek
What do you think about nominating Esopus Creek to GA as well? 420Traveler (talk) 19:00, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Compagnie Francaise de Navigation a Vapeur v. Louisiana Board of Health
— Maile (talk) 00:01, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Downtown Ossining Historic District
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Downtown Ossining Historic District you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CaroleHenson -- CaroleHenson (talk) 08:20, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Desktop improvements prototype
, Daniel Case!

Thanks for taking the time to participate in the user feedback round for our desktop improvements prototype. This feedback is super valuable to us and is currently being used to determine our next steps. We have published a report gathering the main takeaways from the feedback and highlighting the changes we’ll make based on this feedback. Please take a look and give us your thoughts on the talk page of the report. To learn more about the project overall and the other features we’re planning on building in the future, check out the main project page.

SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 12:37, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Global watchlist - Update 6
 Updates associated with DannyS712's Global watchlist script:


 * Future development
 * I have requested a grant to fund conversion of this script into an extension, as well as further development. Please see m:Grants:Project/DannyS712/Create a global watchlist extension.
 * If anyone is interested in reviewing the code and making suggestions regarding coding style, techniques, or something else, please let me know. See T234507 for more.


 * Recent additions
 * The results for each site, as well as the list of sites without changes, can be collapsed; the list of sites without changes starts collapsed.
 * When the username associated with an edit has been hidden (either via revision deletion or suppression) this is now properly shown in the output, rather than showing "undefined".
 * Links to view changes open in new tabs.
 * When marking a site (or all sites) as seen, only changes made prior to the watchlist loading will be marked as seen, so that any changes since then are not missed.
 * There is now a help link in the upper right hand corner that links to m:User:DannyS712/Global watchlist, though it doesn't have the normal help icon.


 * Translations
 * Many thanks to those that have contributed translations for the script's messages. Translation takes place at m:User:DannyS712/Global watchlist/Translate, and help is appreciated.
 * Newly translated messages are added to the script when I notice them; if you have translated messages that aren't showing up, please let me know at m:User talk:DannyS712.


 * Next release
 * Version 9.0.0 was just finalized for the development and stable branches of the script.

To subscribe or unsubscribe from future updates, see the distribution list.

Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 03:11, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Global watchlist user script: About •&#32; Updates •&#32; Code

Your GA nomination of Downtown Ossining Historic District
The article Downtown Ossining Historic District you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Downtown Ossining Historic District for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CaroleHenson -- CaroleHenson (talk) 17:21, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

April 22: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Case
Interesting development with Tom Hagen who was arrested today for the alleged murder and faked kidnapping of his wife.--BabbaQ (talk) 10:09, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Oldest case solved by DNA was announced a few days ago. BabbaQ (talk) 17:40, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Esopus Creek
Great job on Esopus, its looking even better than it already was a few weeks ago. I was wondering if all the tributaries should be added into the course description as well? 420Traveler (talk) 20:46, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Yeah, part of my plan is to expand that part, as I look at it and think "That's what I considered good work ten years ago?" (well, yes it was, because at the time at DYK we only required that the hook fact be cited) I can easily add more now. Daniel Case (talk) 21:14, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Saw Kills
I fixed the Saw Kill problem, and I think everything is ok now. Also I see that "Saw Kill (Hudson River tributary)" is only class C, but I think should be at least a B, and may be ready to be nominated for GA? I just wanted your opinion since you did most of the work on Saw Kill (Hudson River tributary). Thanks, 420Traveler (talk) 17:27, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The Saw Kill problem is bit more complex than it looked. There's also the Columbia County Saw Kill, which I think may now be known as Mill Creek. Across the river just north of Saugerties there's the similar-sounding Sawyer Kill. And lastly the Delaware has a tributary named Sawkill Creek, near Milford, Pennsylvania. I suppose I would be OK with that article being nominated. Daniel Case (talk) 05:21, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I had noticed that but briefly forgot to add them, I can add the others to the disambiguation page. Ill suggest Saw Kill be upgraded to B for now. 420Traveler (talk) 05:35, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Sat May 9: Symposium on Wikipedia and COVID-19
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 14:47, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

West Kill
In the West Kill article, Should we change the part in the intro where it says "The West Kill's 31.2-square-mile (81 km2) watershed accounts for 10 percent of the Schoharie basin and is located at the southern end of that creek's watershed"? I know it means the Schoharie Reservoir, but some people may confuse it with the entire watershed of the Schoharie Creek? Or maybe change it to the way I wrote the intro for Batavia Kill (Schoharie Creek tributary)? Thanks, 420Traveler (talk) 17:13, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I think it does mean the entire creek's watershed. Daniel Case (talk) 04:31, 9 May 2020 (UTC)


 * I thought that article meant the same, but when i checked further, the watershed size of the reservoir is 314 square miles and west kill's watershed is 31.2 square miles which is about 10 percent of 314, but the drainage area at the mouth of the schoharie at the mohawk river is 928 square miles. 420Traveler (talk) 05:24, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * OK ... good catch! I think just clarifying that we're talking about the reservoir would work ... Daniel Case (talk) 05:26, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * yea that looks good, thankss 420Traveler (talk) 16:05, 9 May 2020 (UTC) Also I have expanded East Kill and Batavia Kill, if you have extra time can you help me rewrite the course descriptions? because thats one of my weak points and you are one of the best at writing detailed descriptions. Thanks, 420Traveler (talk) 16:22, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * When I get to them ... I have a lot yet to do on Esopus Creek. Daniel Case (talk) 04:42, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I see someone started the review. I fixed most of the dup-links the reviewer had mentioned, Im not sure about how to fix 1d (prose section), and I think 1j (prose section) is ok because DEC was already clarified above. And im not sure how to fix the Verifiability or the Depth of Coverage issues. Thanks, 420Traveler (talk) 16:52, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
 * It looks like we've addressed the issues, so now we wait (Thanks for picking that up; I was preoccupied with another GAN—Valhalla train crash—which has since passed). I do wish I knew when the name was applied, though—that's a good question. I wouldn't be surprised if my guess—that the West and East kills were the first two upper Schoharie tributaries named (and maybe those weren't meant as permanent names, à la the New River (the theory that it wasn't on the map is the one I heard in WV)). Some research in that area would be nice to do in the future. BTW, I also went up to Red Hook with my son today to make a visit to his school, and on the way back I was able to scoot up US 9W to the Glasco Turnpike bridge and take a pic or two with my phone of the Esopus there, since we don't have any images of the lower Esopus in the article currently. I'll put it in soon. Daniel Case (talk) 00:32, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
 * no problem at all, im glad the article you expanded and I started is almost to good article status. I agree about the naming, as I have looked on old maps and other State documents and cant find anything, not even an Indian name like Batavia Kill has. That's awesome about the pictures, what a nice day it was for a ride yesterday, My dad and I were burning brush yesterday. Hopefully soon we can meet up and hike the west kill area.420Traveler (talk) 23:10, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Actually, "Batavia" is the Latin word for what we now call the Netherlands ... that's why the city upstate is so named, after the Holland Land Company with its majority Dutch investors being headquartered there. I think at the moment that any hiking there is going to be after my son goes back to his school, which might be within the next few weeks ... Daniel Case (talk) 00:14, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh never knew thats the reason they named the city here after Batavia. The Indians also referred to Batavia Kill as "Choughtighignick". And sounds good just let me know. 420Traveler (talk) 14:53, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Recent block of IP editor for edit warring
You recently blocked IP user for Edit warring: right off expiration of last block, and now they have switched to a mobile device 107.77.202.215 and started right back in edit warring at Arthur Rudolph, and been reverted by 4 different editor's, including myself, and also been warned on their talk page as well, as if they didn't know anyway what they were doing. Can you please protect the article, or in the alternative block the new IP. Thanks, I'd appreciate it. Isaidnoway (talk)</b> 09:25, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

"Crime and Punishment"
Hello! Could you please see Talk:Crime and Punishment DonGuess (talk) 13:38, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

May 20: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 15:59, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Albert Seedman
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Albert Seedman you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cavie78 -- Cavie78 (talk) 10:41, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Albert Seedman
The article Albert Seedman you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Albert Seedman for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cavie78 -- Cavie78 (talk) 15:41, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Albert Seedman
The article Albert Seedman you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Albert Seedman for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cavie78 -- Cavie78 (talk) 21:21, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Greenwich Village townhouse explosion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shrapnel ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Greenwich_Village_townhouse_explosion check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Greenwich_Village_townhouse_explosion?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:31, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

June 17: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 01:53, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Esopus Creek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conglomerate ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Esopus_Creek check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Esopus_Creek?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for creating the Brett Cantor and Michael Nigg pages
Appreciate seeing alternative theories of Ron’s and Nicole’s murders, especially considering how slanted the Wikipedia page for the O.J. Simpson murder case is in favor of the prosecution and the mainstream media narrative of the trial. Kayjewel (talk) 05:11, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Request for help
I moved the page Didymos (an asteroid) to Dimorphos (it is a newly named in June) but realised that the latter is actually part of the former. Can you please revert my move and make space for Dimorphos so that I can create a separate article for it? Chhandama (talk) 04:42, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Global watchlist - Update 7
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#606060; background-color:#f8f8f8; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:7px;" class="plainlinks"> Updates associated with DannyS712's Global watchlist script and the Global watchlist extension:

I have received a grant from the WMF to develop this script into an extension. As a result, I do not plan on any further developments being made to the user script. Please see the grant page for more information. Those interested in reviewing and providing feedback for the extension should follow the new phabricator board, tag/mediawiki-extensions-globalwatchlist.
 * Future development

Many thanks to those that have contributed translations for the script's messages. Now that I am working on an extension, translation has migrated to translatewiki. Please see:
 * Translations
 * translatewiki:Special:Translate/ext-globalwatchlist
 * translatewiki:Special:Translate/ext-globalwatchlist-api
 * translatewiki:Special:Translate/ext-globalwatchlist-script

To subscribe or unsubscribe from future updates, see the distribution list.

Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 04:41, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Global watchlist user script: About •&#32; Updates •&#32; Code Global watchlist extension: documentation

Happy Adminship Anniversary!
<div class="boilerplate metadata" style="background-color:#E6E6FA; border: 1px solid #7D00B3; margin: 0.5em auto; padding: 0.5em; width:90%; text-align: center"> Happy Adminship Anniversary! Have a very Case happy adminship anniversary on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:05, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Miranda Priestly
Hello, Good day. Can we have the long-awaited Miranda Priestly article already?... It's been on the draft since 2018. Bionic (talk) 14:08, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Winter of Discontent, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Foot ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Winter_of_Discontent check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Winter_of_Discontent?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

New Brockhold socks

 * 166.181.83.1
 * 64.202.143.43
 * Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:53, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Article move
Hello. There was a discussion of a requested move here, It's been over a week and the consensus has been reached and I'm about to close it but I can't move the page over a redirect, therefore, I ask you to do the Madonna (entertainer) → Madonna as an administrator, please. Bionic (talk) 04:39, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Alright ... since this is not the sort of discussion I usually close, I will have to review everything (even if it is 21-10 in favor of the move; an admin still has to read what people wrote per WP:NOTVOTE), which I'm not up to doing at the moment. Let me wait till tomorrow when I have a fresher mind. Daniel Case (talk) 04:48, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, Good day. I know you're busy but It's been 11 days and the volume of comments on the discussion is getting out of hand. Apparently it's turning into a debate between supporters and opposers and other admins don't seem to care to review and close the discussion. Bionic (talk) 08:25, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I have looked at it and I am thinking about what to say when I close it, which I hope I can do later today. Daniel Case (talk) 15:18, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

It's always a courageous move to tackle closing move discussions that get that long and complicated. So regardless of whether or not they go with my view, I'm always grateful when an admin provides an actual explanation rather than a two word close. So thanks for doing that.--Yaksar (let's chat) 06:38, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you ... I had to take today mostly off-wiki for work reasons, but it's nice after what I did to come back to messages like this instead of the fire-and-brimstone flaming I was afraid of. And again, as I said, a close on an issue like that should be complemented by a full explanation. Daniel Case (talk) 22:03, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Article move request
Hello. When you get a chance, could you complete the move request over at Talk:Luka_Magnotta please? A clear consensus exists, so hopefully it won't take too long. Thanks! Some1 (talk) 23:41, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

You are mentioned...
... at the discussion Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement, because of your block on Thomas Meng two weeks ago. Binksternet (talk) 21:37, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Page Review (Inquiry)
Hi,

I recently wrote a bio page for a popular model based in Turkey and I’d like your review on it. Is it something I can get your input on so you could help make adjustments as Wikipedia tells me “Page has multiple issues” which I feel bad about for such display.

I’d really appreciate your input please, thank you Shortolani01 (talk) 08:14, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Application programming interface RM close
Hi Daniel Case. Do you think you could clarify your decision to close Talk:Application programming interface as no consensus? Specifically, I'm curious how much weight you assigned to the comments from the three anonymous users who argued that the proposed title API was ambiguous with a term in the Malay or Indonesian languages. In my view, those comments were not based on Wikipedia's policies and guidelines and should have been assigned little, if any, weight in the closure (we do not require disambiguation with non-English terms: consider how the word Gift in German means "poison"). I would have either closed the RM with consensus to move or at least relisted the discussion. Mz7 (talk) 17:35, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Well, I'm sort of new to closing RMs and, yes, it looks like you may have a point, although I wish that had been made during the discussion as a matter of policy rather than just, I don't think we should do this. And I also think the one non-anon oppose,, had a point as well. But if you want to open a move review and seek to at least relist it, I don't mind. Daniel Case (talk) 06:16, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking another look! Fair enough, I suppose it would have been clearer for me to state the policy position against the opposes in the discussion itself. Even though Netoholic opposed with a fair point, Netoholic did leave a brief comment dismissing the foreign-language-based opposes, and ultimately no one else agreed with Netoholic's oppose. I think the best solution at this stage would be for you to undo your closure and either relist it, reclose it, or let someone else deal with it. Looking over WP:MRV, it looks quite backlogged—although it claims that discussions there are supposed to be closed after 7 days, many of the active move reviews appear to have gone on for almost a month. It seems advisable to avoid that time-consuming venue if at all possible. Mz7 (talk) 16:47, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Can I do that? I agree it would make sense, but I'm still sort of new to the RM process. Daniel Case (talk) 16:50, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Hmm, I don't think there's any rule that says that the closer themselves can't undo their own closure if there was a misunderstanding about the discussion, but if the closer doesn't agree that the close should be undone, then WP:MRV is the only option. Mz7 (talk) 16:55, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
 * OK, I'll do it later. Daniel Case (talk) 19:05, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Sun Aug 16: Great American Wiknic NYC & Beyond
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 22:28, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sphere before Sept 11.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Sphere before Sept 11.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Blocked IP is back
Same behavior as early July. If it's confirmed this isn't a case of mistaken identity, let me know and I'll do some rolling back, assuming there isn't a bot that will already do it. See also here. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  15:59, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Between myself and at least one other editor, there are no "current versions" with that editor's address on them. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  17:52, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

You should probably indef block
You should probably indef block as it is clearly a LTA sock of Sockpuppet investigations/THCNVN Channel/Archive. Also maybe mass delete the spam pages they created to the talk pages of his other socks. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯  talk  03:30, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:Did you know § DYK Twitter bot
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Did you know § DYK Twitter bot. KCVelaga (talk) 11:36, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

your recent block of user:14.238.83.146
Evading block as user:14.161.36.87. Same ISP, started editing 3 minutes after block, and already back at Ho Chi Minh Meters (talk) 03:42, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Forgot to say that new IP is exhibiting the same behaviour, vandalizing and then self reverting. Meters (talk) 03:44, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Sat Sep 26: Met Fashion Virtual Edit Meet-up
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 17:51, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Users with indefinitely protected user talk pages". Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:19, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Glossary of Brexit terms
You say "deign to eat"? Do you mean "do not deign to eat"? And perhaps prefer a less loaded (even contemptuous) term than "deign"? Errantius (talk) 23:50, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Creek
just checked this for a mouth elevation citation for Esopus Creek. It shows a mouth elevation of -3 feet which to me means 0? Also it shows the native american name for the creek, just not sure how to incorporate it into the article. 420Traveler (talk) 22:13, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Request for page move
I would appreciate if you move the page Von Baer's laws (embryology) over a redirect page Von Baer's law for simplicity and correctness. Chhandama (talk) 14:09, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Fish for finance
Hello! Your submission of Fish for finance at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 13:12, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fish for finance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galicia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Brandon Lee
Hi Daniel,

I just finished refining the Brandon Lee article based on your notes, but also I just read the book on the making of The Crow, from which I added a substantial amount to the article.

A while back I did reply to some of your feedback, some I fixed and some I was doubtful about. Also since I first replied more work was done and more points have been resolved.

Let me know and if you want to take the time or have the time we'll work on it.

Thank you.Filmman3000 (talk) 20:29, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I will get around to it; for now because I've got a lot of other things going on I am just (belatedly) acknowledging that I saw and read this—ahem!—two weeks ago when you posted this. Daniel Case (talk) 20:51, 25 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Cool anytime! I renominated it if you want to take the time or have the time...


 * I resolved point 1, all citations have the same date format.


 * Regarding point 5, all URLs are installed.


 * While I was working on those, well with the book I could add more but found way more on how Lee approached characters, how he got involved in a production, I gained more details on his implication with his dad's biopic, etc.


 * I think I legitimately dished out all information that was within my reach.Filmman3000 (talk) 21:45, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Fish for finance
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Otacon
Hi Daniel. You recently blocked an editor for 24 hours from editing on the Otacon article. Unfortunately, since the 24 hour block expired, the editor has again continued the same pattern of editing disruptively. I'd be grateful if you could take another look at the revision history of the article. Regards, Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 00:22, 16 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi Daniel. Thank you for issuing a further 72 hour block last month in October to the editor who has been editing the Otacon article disruptively. Unfortunately, after that second block the editor has continued the same pattern of disruptive editing. Also, he or she appears to now be using an IP address to insert the same content – unsourced nonsense. Regards, Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 04:33, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lafayette Park Historic District
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lafayette Park Historic District you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of NicolaArangino -- NicolaArangino (talk) 15:41, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

DYK for United Airlines Flight 976
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, I saw your comment on my comment at ERRORS. Even if someone is dead, he might have living relatives. I really don't see the need to name the lawyers. But I'm sure this kind of hook is going to get tons of hits. Yoninah (talk) 22:27, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Based on the obits I found, all his siblings are dead as well, although I think his children are very much with us. All I can say is that he's been dead well past six months and his name was used in the 2015 articles cited (I did consider whether to write this as a bio of him but I wasn't sure what in his bio was a definite claim to notability, while the flight definitely was).
 * I used his lawyer's name because I had to quote him at one point, although not as extensively as I thought I would have to, and when you have to make repeated reference to someone it's just easier to use their name than to find a way to fit "their lawyer" or something like that into every sentence. In any event, lawyers expect that they will be quoted and identified by name when speaking on behalf of clients to the media, even those accused of doing embarrassing or horrible things ... it's part of being a zealous advocate, so I don't see why we shouldn't use their names, either.
 * Yes, it did get a lot of hits, as I thought it would from the time several years ago when I began thinking that the 25th anniversary of this event would be a good time for an article about it. Daniel Case (talk) 17:27, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, it did get a lot of hits, as I thought it would from the time several years ago when I began thinking that the 25th anniversary of this event would be a good time for an article about it. Daniel Case (talk) 17:27, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

October 21: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 04:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

The Devil Wears Prada
Per WP:NFCC: "Contextual significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." "The cerulean sweater speech" is equally an inappropriate caption that doesn't satisfy the usage of a 1-minute video of copyrighted content. (CC) Tb hotch <big style="color: #555555;">™ 18:11, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The accompanying text provides that context. Criterion 8 does not specifically say the fair-use material has to be captioned in such a way as to provide that context ... I do not see fair-use media being so captioned in any other article. Daniel Case (talk) 20:03, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * So this caption should be reduced to "Minogue in the video"? Or these captions reduced to "x-second sample of 'Title'"? The caption I wrote literally summarizes half of the scene you uploaded without the necessity of using non-free content. In fact, any picture of a similar cerulean sweater (plus an appropriate caption and parafrases of the script) replaces the whole point of using the video (WP:NFCC). Justifying a vague caption ("The cerulean sweater speech") under a section called "Cerulean sweater speech", is poor for a good article and is a poor use of non-free material. (CC) Tb hotch <big style="color: #555555;">™ 20:27, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Don't Look Now is also a GA, and likewise doesn't have a long cutline for its use of a clip from the film. If you think that non-free video clips from films need long cutlines even if the accompanying text in the article has enough reliably-sourced third-party commentary to justify the clip's inclusion, then start the discussion at the appropriate talk page (and do let me know ... we have so few film clips in articles that having at least some guidelines would be nice). There's about five grafs in that section discussing just that speech and its role in the long-term appreciation of the film (citing nine separate sources). That's more grafs than there are in the Don't Look Now article next to the clip, more than the one graf that accompanies the clip of the destruction of the Enterprise in Star Trek III: The Search for Spock (an FA). With that much commentary on it I think the reader, especially one who has not yet seen the film or hasn't seen it in a long time, benefits from being able to actually see how it's delivered, how it plays in the actual film. A picture of a cerulean sweater and your extremely superficial characterization of the scene would actually do a disservice to readers IMO. Daniel Case (talk) 20:45, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Don't Look Now was reviewed in 2011, so it's not a particularly relevant example. It, however, can easily be solved with a "Sample of the scene featuring a portrayal of cunnilingus, considered rare at the time". No comment on the 2010 FAC Star Trek III: The Search for Spock, as I haven't read that article, nor watched the film to understand the whole context of the video. But, now I understand why that MOS:CAPTION link you provided was incomplete; the real link is Manual of Style/Captions. The current caption meets "Clear identification of the subject", simply because it is a repetition of the subsection's title. It fails "Succinctness" ("The speech" is simpler); "Non-visual media" (the article provides little context on why Miranda is delievering the speech; the scene is cut, and the text merely limits to call Andy's attitude as snobbish towards fashion, so half of the context on why she is truly being berated is gone); "Establishing relevance to the article" ("A good caption explains why a picture belongs in an article", something the current caption never attepts to do); "Providing context for the picture" (the caption has no context); and "Wording" ("While a short caption is often appropriate [The cerulean sweater speech] consider extending it so that it adds value to the image and is related more logically to the surrounding text"). Nowhere in either WP:CAPTION or MOS:CAPTION say that captions should be short and vague; or that long captions are discouraged; in fact they encourage users to move long captions that describe the picture to be moved to the file's description itself and to avoid vague captions that merely repeat what the main text is already saying. (CC) Tb hotch <big style="color: #555555;">™ 21:49, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * It, however, can easily be solved with a "Sample of the scene featuring a portrayal of cunnilingus, considered rare at the time" So go make that edit, then, instead of just talking about it on someone else's talk page. As for failing "succintness", see MOS:CAPSUCCINCT: "More than three lines of text in a caption may be distracting; instead, further information can be provided in the article body" which I'd be happy to do as in over a decade of working on that article I am very familiar with the sources. "the article provides little context on why Miranda is delievering [sic] the speech" I would direct your attention to the graf immediately adjacent to the picture, which recounts how and why the speech came to be in the film. I suppose I could concede that there should be some in-universe explanation as well, but per MOS:IN-U we are really not supposed to focus on that (And it has occurred to me that adding some more to it, starting where Andrea giggles at the sight of the two belts, would give it more context on its own, something you seem to acknowledge with "the scene is cut").  And just how is a film clip "non-visual media"? I'd like to read this one ... Daniel Case (talk) 22:30, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Chinese home run
Hi – I was looking at the Chinese home run article, and saw that you've made a number of edits to it. The current article text dates the earliest usage of the term to 1927. I have an account on newspapers.com; a search for the term there finds it used in a baseball context in 1919. The usage in 1919 occurs during an account of a Pacific Coast League game between the Los Angeles Angels and the Sacramento Senators. The article appeared in The Los Angeles Times on 20-Aug-1919 with Ed O'Malley on the byline. O'Malley wrote, "Ellis his a tremendous Chinese home run just back of Pinelli's head...", where Babe Pinelli was Sacramento's third baseman and the batter was the Angels' Rube Ellis. Someone else previously found the same usage of the term, as it was 'clipped' on the newspapers.com site last year. You can view the relevant section of the article (with box score) here. Thoughts on incorporating this into the article? Dmoore5556 (talk) 06:25, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Someone else already mentioned this on the talk page. I haven't put it in because, as that thread suggests, I thought I should let Jonathan Lighter know (he might have some sort of qualifier that we didn't know about) but I could not find out how to get in touch with him. Daniel Case (talk) 20:54, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I see, thanks. I'm going to add mention of the 1919 usage to the article; I'll try to make that edit later today. Perhaps Lighter will see it or someone will bring it to his attention. Dmoore5556 (talk) 21:03, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Advice
Hi, I'm writing my first missing-persons article and I need an image. The child disappeared in 1985. Can I upload the left-hand image from the Canadian Centre for Child Protection missing-child website as fair use? Thanks for your advice, Yoninah (talk) 23:10, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I think you could, if she's been missing that long; especially since if she's still alive, she's not that young anymore and her appearance would not be the same if she posed for a picture. Daniel Case (talk) 23:53, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I just posted the new article at Disappearance of Nicole Morin. I used one of your disappearance articles to help with the infobox and talk page. If you have a moment, please let me know if I did anything wrong! Thanks again, Yoninah (talk) 23:55, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Advice on article
Hi Daniel,

There is an article I eventually want to nominate for a good article, an actor named Weng Weng. I wanted your opinion regarding elements of it. In the article, I cite a documentary film and a book about him.

I overcited some area and I am well aware of some of the criticism you would throw at me if you.

My concern is when I cite the documentary (citation 2) I use a DVD, I do not yet point out in the "time" section where the information is being delivered in the documentary. Would that be a concern to you if you were to review the article?Filmman3000 (talk) 21:56, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I would very much like to nominate The Devil Wears Prada for FA, so it could run on the main page next year on the 15th anniversary of the film's release. That's not impossible, but what I have realized I will need to do is get a copy of the DVD/Blu-Ray so I can put in times for all the cites to the DVD commentary. When I wrote the article back in the late 2000s, just citing the commentary was, well, sort of enough. It's since become common practice, both on Wikipedia and off, to give a time indication when citing videos or podcasts, given how long they can get. So, yes, I think having a time would be advisable. Daniel Case (talk) 01:22, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

reversion of my edit to Disappearance of Asha Degree article
Hi, I saw that my edit was reverted on the Disappearance of Asha Degree article a couple days ago. Sorry that I had my edit marked as minor! I'm a newbie and was confused about when to mark an edit as minor, but I I've got the hang of it now. With regards to my reverted edit, I see now how deleting that clause wasn't helpful for the article overall. I'm used academic writing and editing for succinctness and so fell into the less-is-more trap. I'm not sure if this is the right place to be asking (you seem like a busy editor so I hope this isn't a bother), but I'm wondering if you know of any Manual of Style or similar type page that talks about tone and the general approach of encyclopedic language? Thanks! Comm.unity (talk) 09:20, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for not blocking
I really wish to contribute more and learn more to contibute quality articles,I won't engage in that conflict anymore and many editor already came in the articleManipur State Constitution Act 1947 copyright violation also reduced to less than 4% as per copyvio tool. ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯡ  ( ꯆꯥ ) 16:32, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Fauconnier page redirect
Thanks, User:Daniel Case, for catching that. I wrote the bloody Fauconnier patent article, but had a brain spasm and reverted the spelling to the errant "Fanconnier" after seeing it mis-spelled that way in a mid-day drive-by at the Dutchess County, New York page that listed the ostensible fourteen royal patents covering its original footprint. I have since fixed it at that page, and sought to correct any other instances of that mis-spelling I might have propagated elsewhere before setting the record straight. Yours, Wikiuser100 (talk) 04:46, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Tammy Jo Alexander recordings
Hi Daniel,

It's been a while since we last communicated! I remember you did a lot of work updating the article on Tammy Alexander (AKA "Cali Doe") when her remains were identified back in 2015. A couple of weeks ago, the investigating sheriff's department released digitized recordings of the victim's voice for the first time, and I figured you might be interested in listening to them. As someone who closely followed the case, I couldn't help but tear up when I heard them.

Cheers! <font face=FangSong><font color=#D60270>Gourami <font color=#9B4F96>Watcher <font color=#0038A8>Talk 20:27, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

October 18: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC (plus weekend editathons)
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 17:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of alternate history fiction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Basque.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:34, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Four Seasons Total Landscaping press conference
—valereee (talk) 00:02, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Category:Formerly missing people found dead has been nominated for deletion
Category:Formerly missing people found dead has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 20:03, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Police power.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

RE: Fort-Saket
. Sockpuppets will create accounts; vandals will vandalize (example of a user extending-confirming their account solely to prove a point). I know this website loves to AGF on every new account but common sense is still required. Normal people simply don't go to the sandbox, autoconfirm their accounts and rush to vandalize semi-protected pages. So don't even blame it on me because I pinged you 30 minutes ago and the user was already warned to stop when they moved to Moon. And even if I had mentioned Vacuum-Blender, I'm quite sure you'd have still declined it with the "AIV is not SPI" template. (CC) Tb hotch <big style="color: #555555;">™ 05:29, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * You still should have warned them. Even once. None of what you said above justified this rush on your part to AIV without a warning. I don't sit here all the time waiting to respond to AIV reports ... y'know, Saturday Night Live was on, and I was watching it when I took advantage of a commercial break to read your response and see what had happened since then. Since he had by then been warned to stop immediately, and didn't, I was then justified in blocking him indef (and, he's just as indefinitely blocked now as he would be had I blocked him when you had wanted me to. There is nothing in policy that says the sooner we block, the better). Daniel Case (talk) 06:27, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * "he's just as indefinitely blocked now as he would be had I blocked him when you had wanted me to." Dare I say it ... drum roll ... Weknowdis. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs) 🎄  07:03, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

List of unsolved murders
Hi, do you think you could add some entries to the Lists of unsolved murders if I give you some to add? It would make my editing job MUCH easier! Davidgoodheart (talk) 10:29, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I can try, although I may not get around to them right away. Daniel Case (talk) 04:52, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I think that this Sabina Selimovic and Samra Kesinovic is both a disappearance and unsolved murder. Do you agree? I have also been told just because no one has been charged with someone's murder does not necessarily mean it is not unsolved, so that is partly why is ask this. Also HAPPY HOLIDAYS! Davidgoodheart (talk) 13:12, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Like so many of these things that happen in combat zones, you're right that they're in all likelihood dead, but absent any official confirmation of that they are still only missing and unaccounted for. Daniel Case (talk) 17:05, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Speaking of unsolved murders is this person here Svante Grände who was killed an unsolved murder case or not? Even though the article says Grände was killed by the Argentine military in an ambush, it doesn't say if the people who killed him were either identified or charged. Davidgoodheart (talk) 11:30, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

December 16: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 01:55, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Fish for everything
I stumbled over a rather good analysis of the state of negotiations as at 19 December, by the Brexit correspondent of the Irish state broadcaster, that you might "enjoy". See Brexit talks: Last-minute agony over fish and state aid --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 13:14, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I found the bit about the white paper on vessel ownership interesting ... I will have to look up more on that. Daniel Case (talk) 18:38, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Yo Ho Ho
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

Donner60 (talk) is wishing a foaming mug of Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding to your friends' talk pages.

Project: China
Hi, Daniel - I was hoping you could take a look at a few Hong Kong related articles that have been subject to IP NOTHERE behavior. It's beginning to feel like we're herding cats. I don't know enough about the Hong Kong controversy to advance beyond what we've already done, but I am of the mind that if members of Project China could reach out to these IPs and maybe encourage them to engage in civil, consensus building discussions, it may prove helpful. The targeted articles so far include Military of Hong Kong where I just restored a redirect, and has since PP. Prior to that, in an effort to prevent the same IPs from edit warring, Val had to PP the redirects for List of lighthouses in Hong Kong and List of lighthouses in Macau. Also, see this SPI. We have tried to get the IPs to engage in collegial discussions on the TP because the material is not properly sourced, it is noncompliant with NPOV, and it contains OR. <span style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.2em 0.2em,#BFFF00 0.4em 0.4em 0.5em;color:#A2006D"> Atsme 💬 📧 13:00, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:31, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Arbor Hill Historic District–Ten Broeck Triangle
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Arbor Hill Historic District–Ten Broeck Triangle you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of RealLifeLorefan80 -- RealLifeLorefan80 (talk) 02:21, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!
<div class="boilerplate metadata" style="background-color:#E6E6FA; border: 1px solid #7D00B3; margin: 0.5em auto; padding: 0.5em; width:90%; text-align: center"> Happy First Edit Day! Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:03, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

User talk:78.60.127.225
Hello, I'm Chip3004 Please Upgrade User talk:78.60.127.225's block to indefinite because User talk:78.60.127.225 is at again Disruptive editing Many Articles See The Articles below and he is block evading

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Backlash_(2020)&oldid=998949495 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Royal_Rumble_(2021)&oldid=998950717 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=NXT:_New_Year%27s_Evil&oldid=998948205

I already told him to stop Disruptive editing and he is Disruptive editing again.

--Chip3004 (talk) 20:46, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Arbor Hill Historic District–Ten Broeck Triangle
The article Arbor Hill Historic District–Ten Broeck Triangle you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Arbor Hill Historic District–Ten Broeck Triangle for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of RealLifeLorefan80 -- RealLifeLorefan80 (talk) 03:02, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Congratulations
Hi Daniel Case, your article Arbor Hill Historic District–Ten Broeck Triangle is now a GA. Good job mate! RealLifeLorefan80 (talk) 03:57, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Friday Jan 15: ONLINE Wikipedia Day NYC
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 14:50, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Catskill Mountain 3500 Club, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page COVID-19 pandemic in New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Recent geography deletions question
Recently user Geschichte has been deleting many pages. While some should be deleted, many are just stubs that havnt been expanded yet but can be. For example basswood pond was fixed quickly as well as Summit Lake. I may be wrong but just wondering what your opinion is? Thanks -420Traveler (talk) 04:33, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

I'm Vamlos
Thanks. I can now reply.Vamlos (talk) 03:14, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 26
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Driveways (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Son of the South.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Hey
I noticed you blocked User talk:Hemi1525 for 24 hours. Since their block ended they have returned to disruptive editing by adding false information to info boxes on fictional character articles. . I think the main aim of the account is to introduce false information to Wikipedia.<b style="color:blue;font-family:Times New Roman">Rain</b> <b style="color:green">the 1</b> 10:28, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I think that account is, or related to, User:Darryl1212, who performed similar disruptive edits to the same articles. - <b style="color: Purple; font-family: Arial;">JuneGloom07</b>  Talk  17:31, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * For the time being I have blocked this user for 60 hours. I will look into the socking later. Daniel Case (talk) 18:28, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for helping to prevent any further disruption.<b style="color:blue;font-family:Times New Roman">Rain</b> <b style="color:green">the 1</b> 19:12, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Daniel Case (talk) 19:23, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Driveways (film)
Guerillero Parlez Moi 12:04, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

122.11.212.163
Again reported AldezD; gave them a final warning, and now you a BOLO if they show up on AIV again. Thank you.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 04:27, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Question AIAV decline
Hi! I would like to question one of your AIAV declines.

On 20:38, 10 February 2021 (UTC) M.Bitton reported vandalism-only account IamnotaIsaac.

On 22:08, 10 February 2021 (UTC) you declined the report with "No edits since being warned."

has made four edits, all of which were vandalism.

In my opinion, vandalism-only accounts should be blocked without warning, not given a chance to vandalize some more. See Blocking policy. --Guy Macon (talk) 02:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Years ago when I first got the tools, we didn't jump to the conclusion that an account was vandalism-only based on the very first edits. We assumed good faith, or that vandals may really be testing whether someone is looking, or that they may be seeking the notoriety of being blocked. We usually didn't block an account as a VOA until it had continued to vandalize after a couple of blocks. And that was when (IMO) there was a hell of a lot more vandalism than there is now. The point of anti-vandalism work is to prevent or limit damage to the encyclopedia. It is not to rack up a reputation as some tough hombre to be feared. If an account stops after a last warning, or even before that ... well, isn't that the idea behind giving them warnings? If we didn't, it would be sort of like the police writing you a speeding ticket before you saw the first sign with the speed limit, no? Granted, there are exceptions ... if a new account's only edit is clearly in the pattern of an LTA, one that's socked before, then yes I will block the account indefinitely. And maybe if the vandalism is especially egregious, like hate speech or a serious BLP vio, or focuses on one particular person or thing to the point of suggesting the editor has an agenda, yeah. Or if it involves edit warring. Then I will block early ... but that's of course because other policy is involved.


 * I commend to your attention WP:IGNORANCE: "There are many reasons that new editors make inappropriate edits to an article. They may not understand Wikipedia, or they may think it's harmless and/or funny. They may also have read that there is always someone around to revert vandals, and wanted to know if it's true. They might have even been given a standard template warning once or twice, which they may not understand due to jargon. In other words, they may just be ignorant of all the rules. When dealing with this kind of editor, we must start with the understanding that the editor knows nothing, and until provided the chance to see and understand those rules, they may not change."


 * Daniel Case (talk) 04:44, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply. I don't agree, but your position certainly is not unreasonable. Perhaps "He thic had 50 russian wives", "He had afairs with his 50 russian wifes for a dog who was thick", "this is a racist place they only beleive yellow people have lifes to live", and changing "police departments" to "police terrorize citizens" are examples of being ignorant of all the rules, but my opinion remains that the person who wrote those things should explain on their talk page that they now understand the rules before being allowed to edit any articles. I don't think either of us is going to persuade the other, so lets just end this on a friendly note that we disagree. :) --Guy Macon (talk) 05:26, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * IIRC, weren't those edits blocked by the filter? That's another category where I don't block, generally, as that would be superfluous if the edits didn't even make it through. Daniel Case (talk) 16:58, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * . (Ok, that was a bit much, but that's just my favorite template and I wanted to use it...) A reasonably clever 10-year-old could work around most of our filters. And many of them do. We could make the filters much more aggressive of course, but then we'd be blocking all sorts of good faith edits. That's where comes into play. By reporting the user while they're trying to work around the filter, they can be blocked before anything they do reaches the WP:READER. I agree there may not be a point in blocking a possibly dynamic IP if they tried a few times over the span of a few minutes, then stopped, and you're looking at the report hours later. There's obviously a question of "how many attempts is too many". But I think declining to block only because "the edits didn't even make it through" really misses the point of what the filters are for.  Of course, you don't have to block anyone you don't want to block. But I'd urge you to spend a few hours, at different times of day, just watching what other admins do at WP:AIV. Most other admins will block in many circumstances when you will not. In those cases, can I strongly suggest you leave the reports up for an hour or so before declining? Or, if you think everyone else is really in the wrong, start a thread about it somewhere? AIV works most smoothly when there are consistent standards; otherwise people don't know what to report. Either disruption continues, because people falsely expect a report to be declined and don't want to deal with the peanut gallery at ANI, or the board gets cluttered, because people falsely expect a report to be acted on swiftly. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 17:39, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * So ... people think I'm too lenient at AIV, and too harsh at RFU? (sigh) Then perhaps I will stop responding to reports in the bot section until you people can get it right. My experience at AIV is perhaps informed by dealing with patrollers years ago who really seemed to be out there to carve notches on sticks in the hopes of impressing voters at an eventual RFA; more often than not when those RFAs happened it exposed that these people knew everything about vandalism patrol and almost nothing about content creation, and they didn't understand why they didn't get the mop and got all pouty and stopped editing. I get the feeling there are still quite a few of those editors out there. I also get the feeling that it would probably be a good idea to write some sort of guide for admins if we want AIV patrollers to have consistent expectations about how their reports will be responded to. It would certainly cut down on talk page convoes like this. Daniel Case (talk) 17:57, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Regarding the bot reports, are you keeping an eye on the user's contribs after you've declined? The thing is, since they were reported by a bot, it's possible no one else is. If you are I really don't have much of an issue. And regarding the human-submitted reports, oh yes, the "out for blood" editors still exist. I'm by no means suggesting that all or even a large fraction of your AIV declines are wrong. Just a few. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 18:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Perhaps we need the bots to qualify their reports in some way, or to have them go stale sooner than the user-reported ones. Or to indicate that all the edits thus far were stopped by the filter. Because I have lately often done some of my reviewing in the wee hours of North American ET, when the backlog tag is on, and both sections are just stuffed with reports that date back hours. In that situation the understanding is usually to get the page clear. I do look at recent activity, but it's hard to juxtapose those two things in a bot report (and, indeed, I have blocked a few times when it does seem that people are trying to push the edit filter). Maybe the bot could be programmed to add a note to the original report if the same IP attempts to edit at some point after the original report? When you've got two dozen to go through, you must admit it's a little hard to make distinctions. Daniel Case (talk) 18:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I am pretty sure that if edits are blocked by a filter they never show up in the article or on anyone's watchlist, and are thus unlikely to be reported at AIAV. In this case all four edits hit filters, but not blocking filters. The filters were one "Actions taken: Tag", Two "Actions taken: Warn", and one "Actions taken: none".
 * You can see this in the edit filter log link at.
 * If I remember how it works correctly, those two "Actions taken: Warn" filter hits gave IamnotaIsaac warnings on the edit screen, which weakens the "they were not warned" argument. --Guy Macon (talk) 17:55, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Apart from, there are some users who patrol Special:AbuseLog for vandalism. And I'll agree with Daniel that some of those users are way to quick to report. One attempt, and not porn, clear racism, or severe libel? Let the filter do it's thing. Two or three attempts? Maybe warn and certainly keep a close eye, but probably no need to report. But five attempts (DatBot's threshold)? Yeah, very quickly they're going to work out which of "fuck", "fvck", "f u c k", etc., we haven't thought of yet, so it's probably time to block. LTA filters are different. If it's really the LTA, block on one attempt. They will try to evade it. But most RC patrollers can't see LTA filters in the first place. And anyone who hands out a warning based a filter they can't see has some WP:CIR issues and shouldn't be patrolling. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 18:24, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * As I've said, with the LTAs this is a known issue and a repeat offender. I have no problem slapping the standard two-week block down for even one attempt (although there are some (not a lot) of LTA filters where the terms are so vaguely defined you think you might be taking down a legit editor). It might also be helpful if the bots report on how many times the filter did its thing at the time of the report. Daniel Case (talk) 18:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The only bot that reports based on filters is DatBot. If there's a specific filter linked, as in, it's always one attempt. Otherwise it's five attempts (which each may have tripped more than one filter) in five minutes. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 18:49, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, there are or at least used to be other anti-vandal bots, and maybe there will be others that report based on filters in the future. Again, this is stuff that it would be nice to have in some sort of guide for reviewing admins. Daniel Case (talk) 18:53, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I thought we already had a guide for reviewing admins at Vandalism-only account. --Guy Macon (talk) 20:05, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

What I'm talking about is some sort of guide that would explain these bot and filter issues. They're not intuitive. Daniel Case (talk) 20:28, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Vandal IP
How are you? for sure the editions of that IP are rare it is emphasizing in vandalism I ask that all its contributions be verified--Secretsgenius (talk) 04:14, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I think he has insulted me and even so he does not give testimony of what he was doing and restored some withdrawn references for no reason. What should I do?--Secretsgenius (talk) 04:52, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * How about you and he back off from this discussion for a while and either take a break from editing or work on something else? Daniel Case (talk) 04:53, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Well I will leave this in the hands of other editors, because I still do not understand why it withdraws references in many articles is very suspicious greetings. Secretsgenius (talk) 05:00, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

February 17: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 01:22, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Global watchlist - Update 8
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#606060; background-color:#f8f8f8; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:7px;" class="plainlinks"> Updates associated with DannyS712's Global watchlist script and the Global watchlist extension:

As I noted in the last issue, I received a grant from the WMF to develop the global watchlist script into an extension. That extension has now been deployed on Meta. Visit m:Special:GlobalWatchlistSettings to get started.

I do not plan on any further developments being made to the user script. I have released version 9.1.0 to both the dev and stable versions, which includes a notification about the extension being available when you use the user script. You can dismiss the notification, and the script still works, but it will no longer be maintained.

Those interested in providing feedback for the extension should use the phabricator board, tag/mediawiki-extensions-globalwatchlist. Any bug reports about the extension should be filed there.

This will likely be the last update sent to this list.

Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 19:42, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Global watchlist user script: About •&#32; Updates •&#32; Code Global watchlist extension: documentation

Nomination of Shades of Death Road for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shades of Death Road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Shades of Death Road until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –dlthewave ☎ 06:36, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Lloyd Austin
I don’t want to continue with the DYK for Lloyd Austin. May I request that you close it? Thank you! AlabamaFan101 (talk) 23:51, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

IP indef
Hi Daniel, It looks like you may have accidentally blocked an IP address indefinitely: Special:Contributions/198.255.182.168. Probably want to set an expiration date. In any case, thanks for your work at AIV! Best, Mz7 (talk) 03:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * You're welcome; it is now a one-week block for BLP vios though of course if it were an account the logic would have been solid. Daniel Case (talk) 03:55, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Thursday Feb 25: ONLINE Black Wiki History Month at the Schomburg Center
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 07:21, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Question
Hey Daniel Case, I wanted to get some guidance to figure out whether Bavio_the_Benighted is contravening Wikipedia policy or just a content dispute? He's been blocked twice for edit warring and although they stopped editing the main article (which is a controversial topic), they're continuing to put walls of text on the talk page and making arguments for certain changes immediately after their blocks expired. He's also arguing that when you put advice up on his talk page after his second block, that you misunderstood what he was doing and that he's not wrong to continue on the talk page. The discussion has been going on for months now and I thought there was a consensus, since discussion had ended for a week before the user returned. Could you please let me know if I'm right? Thanks NettingFish15019 (talk) 01:11, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry, fixed the name. I've also linked the talk page here. He's claimed that the "Wikipedia page currently represents a view advocated by a South Korean propaganda machine" since I've last posted this comment. NettingFish15019 (talk) 03:44, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * As I said to him, and as I sort of think he's tacitly conceding, he's getting tendentious, desperately trying to toe the policy line. (I also find it interesting that he invokes that SPA that agrees with him ... I was completely unaware of it at the time and I suspect I wasn't the only one. In any case, this may no longer concern us for some time as Bavio has been topic-banned from that page for six months. Daniel Case (talk) 17:04, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Wrong warning?
I saw that you warned 81.159.201.219 for vandalism but you reverted the edit of 122.163.98.119, not 81.159? -- Guherto (talk) 21:03, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I have warned the proper IP now. Thanks. Daniel Case (talk) 21:07, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

User Block 14442tt8479372
Hi there! I appreciate you blocking this user. However, I noticed that their talk page says "indefinite" and the block log says 24 hours. I just wanted to let you know in case one or the other was incorrect. Thanks! Jns4eva (talk) 20:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Fixed that. Thanks. Daniel Case (talk) 20:51, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Airline reservation numbers
Hey, saw your decline of a an AIV report based on Special:AbuseLog/29186053. While many hits from are just run-of-the-mill one-off spammers, this one looks like a very long-term scammer (or perhaps multiple people using the same spambot) who posts fake airline reservation and customer/tech support numbers. has put a lot of work into updating the filter; they will know more. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 19:08, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I declined that one only because they'd made just that one attempted edit. I think there was another one with more, similar activity later that I left a warning on. Daniel Case (talk) 19:10, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Sure, but this is an LTA who does try to actively evade filters. They've probably received hundred of warnings by now. In any case the scammers are trying to steal readers' money which seems like block-on-sight behavior to me. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 19:16, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Alright, I see your point ... I blocked that one for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 19:54, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Sent you an email with some more information. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 20:45, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

You've got a mail from MarioJump83!
Note that you had to request access to my Google Drive, which I am certainly going to accept. BTW, I have a hard time trying to steer Andrew5 (which I adopted as a part of the Wikipedia's Adopt-a-user program - I have nothing to do with him personally or in real life as I live far away from each other) out of Wikipedia as he honestly appears to want to edit Wikipedia more and more. I am concerned that it is getting out of control.  Mario Jump  83!  03:07, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Sat Mar 6: Met Women's History Month Virtual Edit Meet-up
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 01:53, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Possible UPE sock
You recently blocked for undisclosed paid editing. The user wrote Draft:Jhashichi Rani (TV series) (originally in mainspace) and recently the editor resubmitted it with no changes. Just wondering whether the latter user is a sock of the former, thought you might have a better idea of whether that's likely than me. Thanks! — Bilorv ( talk ) 16:15, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * (Same actions with Draft:Eka Peksha Ek (TV show) and Draft:Asmita (TV series), so definitely not a coincidence...) — Bilorv ( talk ) 16:17, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Road question
Is there a specific guideline or policy that say that maps are ok to be used in road articles to determine when a highway had been changed by? I think ive seen it before but cant find it now. For example: The new alignment of US-36 was completed between 1944 and 1945. (then have a map of each year for a refernce) Thanks -420Traveler (talk) 20:29, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

== Sat Mar 13: Asia Art Archive in America: Art and Feminism Edit-a-thon ==

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 00:22, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Arbor Hill Historic District–Ten Broeck Triangle
The article Arbor Hill Historic District–Ten Broeck Triangle you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Arbor Hill Historic District–Ten Broeck Triangle for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chipmunkdavis -- Chipmunkdavis (talk) 13:41, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

IP 181.209.150.16 - Continued disruption at Drivers License (song)
This IP continues to edit war at the article (namely, this edit, representing every edit in their entire contribution history). The change they've been making misrepresents what is stated in the source backing the content they are changing, and the IP has been repeatedly warned. You were the one who blocked them a few days ago (thanks, by the way), and I'll ask you to review their editing behavior again. MPFitz1968 (talk) 20:51, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Court of Master Somms
Hi again! I appreciate you taking the time to expand on the Court of Master Sommelier's 2018 cheating scandal. The article as a whole has not been seriously edited in a long time. I want to note, however, that your section on this now far outweighs any other portion of the article. Even though there is significant press coverage, this one-time event in the 'Americas' portion of the organization should not be given undue weight over the rest of the article. I would suggest commenting out a portion of your text for now, and/or helping expand other portions of the article. Thanks and best, ɱ  (talk) 13:21, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

March 17: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC with Wikimedia Community Ireland for St Patrick's Day
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 14:46, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

"Creepy puzzle" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Creepy puzzle. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 19 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 08:41, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Is there a rule forbidding links within articles ?
Thanks. Apokrif (talk) 18:28, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * It's a circular link. The wikilink that you added was to a redirect back to the article you were editing. Schazjmd   (talk)  18:31, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but my question is: "Is there a rule forbidding links within articles ?" (the link sends to a different section of the article). Apokrif (talk) 10:47, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The link Schaz should have included is MOS:CIRCULAR. Daniel Case (talk) 14:38, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect: "linking to a title that redirects to a section or anchor within the article (redirects with or ) is acceptable". Apokrif (talk) 09:33, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Ah ... another example of dynamic tension in our policies. I guess my real objection is that the law could probably merit an article of its own if adequate research was done, and that's the sort of situation that latter policy contemplates ... a section ultimately intended to be spun off. Given the relative rarity with which we actually use self-redirects that way, I think that's the understanding most people have. Daniel Case (talk) 15:18, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Modest flowers
Thank you for what you said on Yoninah's talk, - see also Wikipedia Signpost/2021-03-28/Obituary! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:49, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Singapore-on-Thames
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:01, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Word
Hey I just wanted to let you know that a vandal is attacking me. He said F*ck you to me in an article. I reported him to AIV. Scorpions13256 (talk) 04:57, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Never mind. It's good. Scorpions13256 (talk) 05:01, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

April 21: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC with with Environmental focus
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 00:29, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

2018 cheating scandal
Hi Daniel: I just read over the 2018 Master Sommelier exam cheating scandal article prior to promoting it to DYK. What a fascinating story – and a great article! Thanks. I learned some new things today. :) MeegsC (talk) 09:44, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Yeah, I didn't know anything about this till that Vice article early last month. I had originally just added it to the Court of Master Sommeliers article, but then it got large enough that it was taking up the most space in the article, so I decided to split it off. Daniel Case (talk) 14:06, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

User talk:64.46.10.129
Hello,

Here is a look the activity going on since you have blocked the user. Not sure what if anything should be done, nor suggesting anything should necessarily be done. --DB1729 (talk) 13:20, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Per WP:BLANKING, this is just fine; he's presumed to have read all this. Daniel Case (talk) 13:59, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi again. Sorry, but the page is on my watchlist and something just didn't seem right about what was going on. It's the whois and repeat templates in question and the fourth bullet at this guideline. The latest flurry of activity resulted in what seems to be a contradiction to what you've stated above. --DB1729 (talk) 22:06, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Alright, I see the page has been protected. I hadn't realized we'd added things like whois to the "cannot be blanked" list (although, interestingly, SPI notices, which once were on that list, aren't anymore). Daniel Case (talk) 15:05, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Indeed. Just out of curiosity. The IP's block will expire in a couple days. Will the page protection affect the IP's ability to edit their own talk page? --DB1729 (talk) 15:23, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, it would as it's not part of the block. Really, though, in that case it makes a lot more sense to extend the block with the talk page access revoked. Daniel Case (talk) 17:15, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Once the local block expires, the global one will kick in. The reason I semi-protected the page was to stop the obvious socking going on there; reblocking with talk page access revoked wouldn't prevent that. -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:28, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * That's pretty much what I was getting at.
 * I thought it might be best, or that you'd prefer, you are made aware of this.
 * Thanks for your time. Have a great day! --DB1729 (talk) 17:33, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for that clarification! --DB1729 (talk) 17:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Global watchlist - Update 9
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#606060; background-color:#f8f8f8; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:7px;" class="plainlinks"> Updates associated with DannyS712's Global watchlist script and the Global watchlist extension:

Hi everyone. As I noted in the last issue, I received a grant last year from the WMF to develop the global watchlist script into an extension. That extension has now been deployed on Meta. Visit m:Special:GlobalWatchlistSettings to get started.

That grant has ended, and I have requested another grant to continue development of the extension, and figured subscribers of the newsletter about the user script might be interested. You can see and comment on the grant request at m:Grants:Project/DannyS712/Continued work on GlobalWatchlist extension - if you support this, I hope you'll consider endorsing the request.

Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 00:28, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Global watchlist user script: About •&#32; Updates •&#32; Code Global watchlist extension: documentation

DYK for 2018 Master Sommelier exam cheating scandal
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:01, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of South End–Groesbeckville Historic District
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article South End–Groesbeckville Historic District you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 04:41, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of South End–Groesbeckville Historic District
The article South End–Groesbeckville Historic District you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:South End–Groesbeckville Historic District for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 05:21, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

AIV
Just wanted to thank you for taking the time to go through those reports at AIV. I have never seen it as bad for inappropriate reports. Lots of non-vandals, or unwarned vandals and even plenty of single edit accounts. It makes it worse that there are so many inappropriate bot reports now. I might raise it to the operator(s) when I get a chance. For the time being I have given up going through AIV because it takes too long to find an accurate report. Thanks again. TigerShark (talk) 17:46, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of South End–Groesbeckville Historic District
The article South End–Groesbeckville Historic District you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:South End–Groesbeckville Historic District for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 22:21, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

GSI Mariner
I have opened a discussion at the above page. Lyndaship (talk) 15:35, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Reblock please
Hi, could you reblock 2600:1016:B000:0:0:0:0:0/43 with its current settings? When you blocked it, you didn't give a reason. Nyttend backup (talk) 17:05, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
 * It took a little work to find the AIV report, but I was able to, and amended the block to add the reasons from that report. Daniel Case (talk) 17:24, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Translation help
Hi there. I've seen you listed as an active Russian-to-English translator. Could you please translate the following paragraph, I'm having some trouble: "Режиссёр отмечал, что в игре каждый из действующих лиц был чрезвычайно эмоционален и пластичен, но вместе с тем герои оригинала были названы плоскими и схематичными. После того, как их перенесли на бумагу, Ган понял, что итоговый результат оказался неудачным. Актёры являли собой более объёмные и сложные образы, потому многие персонажи подверглись переработке. Создатели фильма хотели, чтобы все герои картины казались серыми и неясными, как бы находясь в разных измерениях одновременно." Have a nice day. <small style="font color:black">ภץאคгöร 18:24, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
 * OK, I ran it through Google Translate and then cleaned it up myself a little (some better word choices and more fluid English:

"The director noted that in the game, all of the characters were extremely emotional and plastic, but at the same time the heroes of the original had been called flat and cardboard. On paper, Gan realized that the final result was unsuccessful. The actors presented themselves as voluminous and complex characters, so many characters were reworked. The filmmakers wanted all the characters in the picture to appear dim and gray, as if they were in different dimensions simultaneously." Daniel Case (talk) 05:00, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

May 19: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 03:13, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Courtesy ping...
... and an apology for dragging you into continued unpleasantness, but since you were involved, you may want to be aware of this. Or not. In any case, thanks for all you do around here. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 17:14, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roxham Road, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Channelization.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

IP vandal is back
Bakkster Man (talk) 01:24, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

June 16: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 16:17, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Check the correctness of the translation
- you can check the correctness of the translation from here  --Vyacheslav84 (talk) 14:39, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Probable sock
Tdddudidldsuxgd appears to be the same person as Paishsydydhdh who you blocked as a sock. Notfrompedro (talk) 16:04, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Blocked indef ... as much for the nonsensical username as for the socking. Daniel Case (talk) 17:03, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Common Veterinary Area
I'm trying to build up Common Veterinary Area (Swiss-EU agreement) into an article of value, since I suspect that it will become topical as the way to resolve the Great Northern Ireland Sausage Crisis. Most of what I've collected thus far (and have yet to add) is about meat and meat products, plus one item on racehorses. I don't have anything on sea-foods since, I suspect, it is not a topic that bothers the Swiss much. But it occurred to me that you might have something "oven-ready"? I'm thinking of non-depurated shellfish, Scottish fish 'going off' waiting for border clearance, and of course the "unknown unknowns" that I'm not even aware of. If it interests you, please feel free to dive in. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 15:13, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

What to look for in images of streams/rivers
I remember working with you on the GA review of Esopus Creek, and remember that you added several photographs of your own to that. Wilsons Creek (Missouri) has no image, but has room for one. Recently took both File:Wilson's Creek (Missouri) at WCNB 1.jpg and File:Wilson's Creek (Missouri) at WCNB 2.jpg. What would be the best criteria to use for determining which one would be the better to use in the article? Hog Farm Talk 02:04, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * If you only have room for one picture at the moment, and it looks that way, the one with the bridge is frankly more interesting (And if you want me to move those two to Commons, I'd be happy to). Daniel Case (talk) 05:31, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah, if you could move those to Commons that would be nice. I think the only benefit to keeping them here would be if they were potential featured picture candidates, and they're nowhere near quality for that, so Commons is probably the best home for them. Hog Farm Talk 06:09, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Whether they're hosted on Commons or not doesn't matter (all the FPs I have here are hosted on Commons). In fact, most images hosted here on enwiki can't be FPs as they're not freely licensed. Copyright is the only reason we host images here (and there are some images that, while free in the U.S., are not in their country of origin, so we host them here as well with a tag stating this). Daniel Case (talk) 15:18, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Your block of user:195.235.52.100
Clearly socking as user:195.235.52.107 with Meters (talk) 18:47, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Now range blocked. Meters (talk) 19:35, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Regarding your comment to DGG about potentially unblocking Stonkaments
Please be aware that DGG is also involved here, as is made clear e.g. by their recent comments in the prior section of Stonkaments' talk page. I would simply ask you to review all the facts about the dispute that led to Stonkaments' partial block rather than simply taking DGG's presentation of the situation at face value. From my point of view (admittedly as someone who has for a long time been frustrated with Stonkaments' behavior), the idea that RandomCanadian's actions represent equal reason for a block on both parties or a block on neither, as DGG stated, is absurd given that only Stonkaments engaged in edit warring. This is clearly shown in the article's history (see June 13–23). The broader pattern of disruption, WP:SEALIONing and WP:IDHT behavior that led to this partial block are, as Drmies pointed out, also worthy of a comprehensive review that has yet to be undertaken. Generalrelative (talk) 20:43, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you
... for what you said on User talk:SlimVirgin - missing pictured on my talk, with music full of hope and reformation --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:35, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Telegram
- TheresNoTime 😺 17:42, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!
<div class="boilerplate metadata" style="background-color:#E6E6FA; border: 1px solid #7D00B3; margin: 0.5em auto; padding: 0.5em; width:90%; text-align: center"> Happy Adminship Anniversary! Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:01, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

You want some good Action Park related material to look at, check out the Sussex County records
It is where I found the 1978 Action Park plans. There is a lot of stuff that is not up on the site, and not accessible, from the Action Park (or Mountain Creek Waterpark for that matter) days (probably a combination of lost or not yet digitized, who knows), but what is there is pretty neat.

http://records.sussex.nj.us/

Block 190 (lots 9, 10, 10A) is where Waterworld and the Alpine Center were, 184 is where Motorworld was.

Also note that there are records where you will not find an applicant name - for example, the revised 1980 Action Park plans (which come with the 1978 plans in the same document). There also appear to be plans for the park from 1984 that are either severely smudged, like they got water damaged, or a botched scan, which sucks because that was a notable year for the park (when a lot of rides - including the Roaring Springs part of the park IIRC) opened.

Just wish Camden County NJ, or Monroe County, PA had similarly accessible stuff, as then I'd be able to, most likely, find information on Action Mountain and Pocono Action Park. Bleh.

FIGS undue weight question
Hi Daniel, I am Todd and work for the apparel company FIGS. I found your name on the members' list of WikiProjectFashion and therefore I am hoping that you might be persuaded to look at the Marketing section of the FIGS article, which I think is undue weight. This section, which describes just one incident in the company's eight-year history, takes up almost as much space in the article as the entire History section. I have brought this issue up on the Talk page in the past, but the one editor that interacted with me disagreed that it was undue weight. Therefore, I am seeking out a second opinion from you, a veteran Wikipedia editor, to see if you agree with me that some of the content there can be trimmed to bring the section down to a more appropriate length. I truly appreciate your help. --Todd at Figs (talk) 17:20, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 * This is a gentle nudge asking you again to please take a look at the Marketing section of the FIGS(apparel) article with respect to its length and balance, as explained above. I would really appreciate any help that you can give. Thanks, Todd at Figs (talk) 19:35, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi Daniel, I see that you tried to begin a discussion on the Talk:Figs page, but more than a week has gone by and no one has engaged with you about the Undue problem in the Marketing section. I wonder if you can now, please take the matter into your own hands and make whatever edits you feel would create a balanced and fair discussion in the Marketing section. I appreciate your assistance. Todd at Figs (talk) 16:29, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Roxham Road
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

July 14: Virtual Coney Island Meetup + NYC monthly collaboration
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 14:36, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roxham Road, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jordanian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of New York Court of Appeals Building
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article New York Court of Appeals Building you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Epicgenius -- Epicgenius (talk) 19:41, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

List of air rage incidents
Not trying to be antagonistic, but I'll admit i'm slightly disappointed that my edits were reverted. I won't revert them back, since i don't want to start an editing war and get myself blocked from editing that page and/or have the page locked. Is there anything i can do to prevent future edits by me on that page from being reverted? I just wanted to, yes, make the article a little more grammatical and readable and also make the article in general better so that the issues at the top of the article could be rectified. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NotBobbyBrackins (talk • contribs)
 * The best way to avoid this sort of thing is, IME, to just edit the article section by section rather than as a whole, especially if it's a long one. As I said some of the things you did, most notably taking out the names of non-notable individuals (unless, like Mr. Finneran, the air rage itself conferred enduring notability on him, or there's something notable about the incident or whatever punishment they received for it ... I think that guy in Georgia who got the longest U.S. sentence, and the guy coming back to Britain from South Africa who got the largest fine, the other British guy whose four-year-four-month sentence is the longest ever for air rage, and that other British guy (is it me, or is there some pattern developing here?) who got arrested and sentenced once, then did it again a couple of years later) who might still be alive and have not done anything else to get their names in the papers since (i.e., I think one of those "Air Rage twins" from northern Michigan, who years later got arrested for heroin possession, might count). I did sort of wrestle with that while writing the articles ... I figured, better to use their names and take them out later rather than the other way around. That said ... I hope you don't take that "Mrs. Snodgrass" thing personally, but I have noticed this trend in recent years among editors with, shall we say, fresher memories of secondary education than I (I suspect) to add relative pronouns in situations where they aren't really necessary, to insist on infinitive rather than progressive forms of complementary verbs, practices that to me don't impact the formality of the writing and make it needlessly wordy (per the somewhat controversial Strunk and White exhortation to "Omit needless words"). Is this something that's being taught in English classes today, getting marked in red on essays? It's not how I would have done it, nor marked. I mean, I'm not unfamiliar with the challenges of teaching, and grading, writing to adolescents. I can understand the aversion to semicolons, notwithstanding our MOS giving out only the most basic advice on their proper use and not limiting their use on Wikipedia in any way other than that, since it's hard to teach their proper use and better just to avoid the issue ... I mean, I myself have told students that if you don't feel you can use a semicolon correctly, then you probably shouldn't use it all. But abusus non tollit usum.  By all means help edit the article ... but it's easier to be bold sometimes in smaller steps. Daniel Case (talk) 03:03, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the explanation. That makes sense.  To be honest, I haven't been editing Wikipedia for too long, and I am somewhat of a grammar freak but not rigidly so.  That being said, if I decide to edit the article, I'll keep your points in mind and "go easy" so-to-speak.

Thanks again!

Disambiguation link notification for July 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of landmark court decisions in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Police power.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Once upon a time, a very long while ago...
I'm not sure if this is a record, but it can't be far off. What on earth can anyone think is the purpose of doing this? 🤔 JBW (talk) 20:19, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
 * The most charitable guess I could make is that it was someone new to making AIV reports who either didn't realize that it has to be recent, or who didn't look at the timestamp. To me it was sort of dwarfed by the report immediately following it, in which someone felt a 9-month old warning (and not even a final one, at that). was enough. I thought of making a remark that if you invite me over to your house, I'll pass on eating or drinking anything you offer me, but I decided that for now I'll leave the snark to unblock denials. That might not even be the record ... I think I recall years someone reported some vandalism that had happened almost a year before. Daniel Case (talk) 21:19, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Actually, Daniel, a couple of thoughts occurred to me after I posted the above message. Firstly, I remembered that once I posted a talk page warning, having seen the date and time of the incident in question, which was a short while ago on the current day, but without noticing the year, which was not the current year, so my message was at least one year out of date, maybe more than one.   😳    Perhaps that puts me in a weak position to make remarks like the one above.  Secondly, I don't know whether I've seen AIV reports further out of date than the one I commented on or not, but I've certainly received a "thank you" notification for something I did over a decade ago. So no, this one is probably nowhere near a record. JBW (talk) 22:45, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

174.250.144.0/22
Hi Daniel, you recently blocked and I came across some other vandalism so was checking a range and came up with Special:Contributions/174.250.144.0/22. Almost all edits going back to February (and even beyond) from this range have been reverted. What do you think about extending the block to this range and perhaps making it longer? S0091 (talk) 19:23, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Done. Range blocked for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 19:25, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks! S0091 (talk) 19:33, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I found another one, Special:Contributions/174.253.0.0/23. S0091 (talk) 20:37, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ On enforced vacation for a week as well. Daniel Case (talk) 20:43, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I shall leave you alone. Enjoy! :) S0091 (talk) 20:44, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

New message from Narutolovehinata5
<B> Naruto love hinata 5</B> (talk · contributions) 02:20, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scott Lee Kimball, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Confidence man.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Fishing industry in Switzerland
— Maile (talk) 12:02, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lafayette Park Historic District
The article Lafayette Park Historic District you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lafayette Park Historic District for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of NicolaArangino -- NicolaArangino (talk) 05:21, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Scott Lee Kimball
Hello! Your submission of Scott Lee Kimball at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BuySomeApples (talk) 05:21, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Sat Aug 14: Wikimania Wiknic NYC
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 18:45, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of New York Court of Appeals Building
The article New York Court of Appeals Building you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:New York Court of Appeals Building for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Epicgenius -- Epicgenius (talk) 15:41, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Scott Lee Kimball
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Category:Fashion in fiction has been nominated for renaming
Category:Fashion in fiction has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 18:48, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

RU.TV
Добрый день!, мне вас посоветовали тут: Help_desk. Дополните перевод (текст) с Русской Википедии и снимите шаблон, пожалуйста. Можете писать по-английски и-по русски, я пойму. Спасибо заранее!--Станислав Савченко (talk) 19:58, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Twistedriott
Hello Daniel Case, I want to let you know that Twistedriott is disruptive editing once again after being blocked for 24 hours, I also left him a message on his talk page to let him know that what he is doing is unacceptable. I added a report to Administrator intervention against vandalism Noticeboard again, Even if he is blocked longer and once the block expires i'm sure that Twistedriott will return to his old ways and begin to disruptive editing once again. Chip3004 (talk) 03:09, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

FWIW, I couldn't find two admins in that massive nowhere discussion. Looks like an example of why non admins should probably avoid discussions with with blocked users. Just worsens the disruption. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 00:03, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Since it's often admins who are in those discussions, I perhaps mistakenly assumed they were. They were certainly talking like it. Daniel Case (talk) 02:01, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vestal High School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hobart College.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

August 25: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 14:18, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

YOUR ACCOUNTABILITY AS ADMINISTRATOR

 * Thanks for you additional insights and guidance, Daniel Case. Indeed you failed to provide explanation when due in your (nice and short) decision on appeal. Before bringing the issue to upper WP authority, I kindly offer you, along with User JBW or even Yamla, the opportunity to comply with WP:ADMINACCT by explaining your respective actions, account taken of the facts reported in the appeal and any other you may have considered to take your decisions. Thank you very much. --PLUS ULTRA CARLOS (talk) 04:34, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard
Hi, FYI: ==Notice of noticeboard discussion== There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--PLUS ULTRA CARLOS (talk) 14:34, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Coordinators and help needed
Hi, if you are active on Wikipedia and are still interested in helping out with urgent tasks on our large Schools Project, please let us know here. We look forward to hearing from you. Sent to project members 13:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC). You can opt of messages here.

Assistance again for FIGS (apparel)
Hi Daniel, Todd here again from FIGS. I really appreciate the work you've done on the FIGS page and was hoping you could return for a few specific items. Your edits to the Marketing section have been great; I've noticed just a few other small items that are important to change. I received pushback on the request from another editor that doesn't address the point on hand. I'd appreciate it if you could join the conversation and take a look at the short and specific clarifications to the marketing section. Thanks! Todd at Figs (talk) 23:04, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Schoharie Creek
Hi, just wanted to let you know I'm starting to slowly work on bringing Schoharie Creek up to GA status. I know your busy with other projects but was wondering if at some point you could help me write the the course description, which I'm not that good at. Also I'm still ready anytime you are to hike to the source of West Kill. Actually a few months ago in May, I hiked to the Hunter Mountain fire tower (#17/31 for me) and didn't realize/forgot until later how close I was to the source. Hope all is well -420Traveler (talk) 02:24, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Funny you should mention that. August, between the weather and some other things, turned out to be not such a good month for me after all. I am, nonetheless, considering the possibility of going up there tomorrow to maybe take some pics of the West Kill above West Kill (and the falls, which should be great given all the recent rain. There are some other uncertainties remaining to be cleared up, but ... it's still entirely possible that before the end of the summer, perhaps in the middle of a week, I might be able to do this. I will keep you posted. Daniel Case (talk) 04:00, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I was able to get some good pics last weekend (both on the phone and my DSLR, although for now as with Esopus Creek I will only be able to upload the former) and some video. I got some Japanese knotweed and the southern hardwood forest on the banks of the Esopus, and more pics of the West Kill, including video of it flowing into the Schoharie. I am in the middle of something else right now totally not related to geography but of course I will be able to write a section on the Schoharie's course. And speaking of which, maybe we might want to see about hiking to that stream's source? It would involve less vertical and isn't as far from the trail. It's something I've always wanted to do. May not get the chance with what's left of this summer, but keep it in mind. Daniel Case (talk) 05:21, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Murder of Dee Dee Blanchard-related
I saw your revision you did to my edits. There is a page inspired by the Murder of Dee Dee Blanchard that is on Wikipedia by your descriptions for a while called Love You To Death, but it is now up for deletion despite the coverage that the page I am talking about having press information. I just wanted to let you know that as I was putting the names there just in case the consensus is delete. --Rtkat3 (talk) 15:09, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Disappearance of Michele Anne Harris
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

St. Mary's Church
Hi Daniel: I noticed you closed the PR of this article. I recently placed it on my watchlist so that I could start the PR, but I did not get the chance yet. If you would like to revert your edits I'd be more than happy to start it today or tomorrow. If you would like to leave it be, that's OK, too. Just thought I'd throw it out there... - Pax  Verbum  17:49, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh, OK, sure ... I always welcome a PR before a GA nom. Daniel Case (talk) 17:50, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Wonderful! I will set up the PR now, with an eye toward the GA requirements. Of course, it's not a guarantee of passing GA, but hopefully it will help. - Pax  Verbum  20:06, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

RU.TV
Добрый день! Помните ли вы о статье?--Станислав Савченко (talk) 12:53, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Спасибо за дополнение статьи!--Станислав Савченко (talk) 01:03, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Assou ou-Baslam - block evasion?
Hi Daniel, while reviewing Draft:Assou ou-Baslam I noticed  picked up the editing the draft right after you blocked  so I suspect they are the same user. S0091 (talk) 00:33, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I do, too, but let's see if they edit again. Daniel Case (talk) 02:43, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

September 29: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon + Annual Members' Meeting NYC
Upcoming events:
 * Prospect Park photo contest, ongoing
 * Latinx Art Wikipedia Edit-a-thon, October 6
 * Wiki-Pavilion Picnic NYC in Prospect Park (with WikiProject Craft + WikiConference North America), October 10

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 04:42, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

About speedy deletion criteria
Hi, Is there any criteria for submitted draft article which is the copy of existing article? Please tell me. Best regards ! Fade258 (talk) 09:46, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Romulus and Remus (Rubens)
Добрый день, Daniel Case! Не знаю даже кому обращаться. Дополните, пож. эту страницу, и подставьте источники, когда у вас есть свободное время, спасибо!--Станислав Савченко (talk) 11:34, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Sunday: Wiki-Pavilion Picnic NYC (part of WikiConference NA, Oct 8-10)
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 17:22, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lum v. Rice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Great Migration.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Merchandise Giveaway Nomination – Successful


Hey Daniel Case,

You have been successfully nominated to receive a free t-shirt from the Wikimedia Foundation through our Merchandise Giveaway program. Congratulations and thank you for your hard work! Please email us at merchandise@undefinedwikimedia.org and we will send you full details on how to accept your free shirt. Thanks!

On behalf of the Merchandise Giveaway program,

-- janbery (talk) 19:42, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of St. Mary's Church (Albany, New York)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article St. Mary's Church (Albany, New York) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 17:00, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of St. Mary's Church (Albany, New York)
The article St. Mary's Church (Albany, New York) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:St. Mary's Church (Albany, New York) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 20:00, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Unblock IP address for editing
Hi Daniel Case. Thanks for your message. Couple of days back in middle of edit I found the message that the IP address was blocked for editing. However, after few hours the editing process got normal. I am sorry for the inconvenience caused and thank you for the time. Gardenkur (talk) 02:38, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of St. Mary's Church (Albany, New York)
The article St. Mary's Church (Albany, New York) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:St. Mary's Church (Albany, New York) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 01:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

IP Block Exemption
How do I go about requesting IP Block Exemption on-wiki? I don't have an email address attached to my account, and for personal reasons that I'd rather not get into, I don't plan on changing that. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 22:49, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I suppose I could find a way to ask someone else to do the checks ... it does seem like the process doesn't account for users who don't want to divulge an email address. Or you could create a throwaway one just for this purpose. Daniel Case (talk) 22:57, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Wet meadow
Добрый день! Ссылки не работают. Подправьте, пожалуйста--Станислав Савченко (talk) 11:59, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Вы свободны сейчас?--Станислав Савченко (talk) 14:22, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Извените, вы правы, я был занят. А сеичас, у меня есть время. Какие Ссылки не работают на этой страниц? Я не отличить. Daniel Case (talk) 02:45, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Все --Станислав Савченко (talk) 15:08, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Подправить сможете Вы? Вы не заняты?--Станислав Савченко (talk) 11:12, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Спасибо!--Станислав Савченко (talk) 10:21, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

DYK for United States v. Throckmorton
—valereee (talk) 12:02, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Marshall v. Holmes
—valereee (talk) 12:02, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Graver v. Faurot
—valereee (talk) 12:02, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Lum v. Rice
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

2022 Winter Olympics
FYI anon user 1.42.212.231, who you blocked for a month, has resumed their vandalism following the block expiration.18abruce (talk) 11:32, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
 * FYI anon user 1.43.127.155 has resumed the same pattern, seemingly from the same location as the above user.18abruce (talk) 20:57, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

GA review
Hi Daniel Case,

Thanks very much for your review. I hope to dig into it properly soon. I have a very basic question: is it typical for responses to a GA review to be interspersed with the review itself, or collected at the end? (Or, if both are common, do you have a preference in this case?).

Thanks, JBL (talk) 11:11, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Either way is fine with me, actually. Daniel Case (talk) 21:09, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Great, thanks! --JBL (talk) 00:49, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Long-term abuse/Zhmailik
I don't know what your familiarity is with the case--probably bigger than mine. Anyway, consider having a look at this one. Tbhotch, you may have an opinion too. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 18:22, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I didn't know of this case until this morning, but I think this is one ... one of his other registered accounts also uses "Ariana". Daniel Case (talk) 21:10, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Ha, I see is on it too. Thanks. Drmies (talk) 22:44, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Socks were reported, cheese whiffs were detected. Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)  22:53, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Block Evasion
The IP that you had partially blocked 2401:4900:5851:7852:BF8D:DB70:B4CB:78B0 is evading the block. The block expiration is on 12 March 2022. The IP is vandalising articles even after several warnings. Requesting permanent block. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2401:4900:5851:7852:BF8D:DB70:B4CB:78B0 Partha Basak 07:04, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I blocked that IP specifically from the two articles it was vandalizing. We cannot add more articles to the partial range block. Nor can we block IP addresses permanently. You could, if you wanted, ask the user who laid the rangeblock about making it a total block, since as you know this is not the first time one of the IPs within the range has vandalized other articles. Daniel Case (talk) 07:11, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks Partha Basak 07:12, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Center Square/Hudson–Park Historic District
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Center Square/Hudson–Park Historic District you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 01:40, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Partially blocked user vandalising
Hello Daniel. You partially blocked an IP user 2401:4900:52F5:F0F2:E41F:B5E7:86C0:DA41 from some articles with an expiration time of 12 March 2022. But they still vandalizing. I've reverted their vandalism in martial arts. But I think this user is a vandal, although I'm new here, I shouldn't tell this. This user should be blocked. Thank you. Richard M William (talk) 08:45, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
 * This is kind of difficult because as the notes on the block say, it's a checkuser-based rangeblock. We have also reached the ten-page limit for a partial block. The block notes also say that no changes should be made to it without consulting the admin who imposed it; I think you'd be better off talking to them since I don't feel comfortable doing it on my own. Daniel Case (talk) 18:07, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

A rogue editor
Hello Daniel, I appear to be dealing with a rogue (?) editor called Tobias Brohl who, until now, appears to have contributed little, or anything, to Wikipedia. He appears to dispute for the sake of disputing. Please see User talk:Peter Horn Right now I'll answer him. Peter Horn User talk 01:50, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Make that little or nothing. Peter Horn User talk 02:26, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I agree that his manner leaves a little to be desired. But I don't think that issuing templated warnings would work. My suggestion is that maybe you find one of the German-speaking admins to reach out to him and explain that he's having this effect? Or I could do it for you? Daniel Case (talk) 04:04, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * No further action is necessary. Tobias and I settled amiably. Please see the final exchanges at User talk:Peter Horn Peter Horn User talk 16:43, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Citations needed
Hi Daniel, I need user:Emdx to give me citations for AAR "plate" loading gauge diagrams compared to UIC (pdf & Autocad) but he is blocked. Peter Horn User talk 18:27, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Please see user talk:Emdx Peter Horn User talk 18:31, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Talk page access of 98.235.155.81
Hello; please consider revoking talk page access from 98.235.155.81 due to talk page abuse. Thank you! Tol (talk &#124; contribs) @ 23:37, 21 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Um, you've changed block settings of the IP and said you've revoked talk page access, but you haven't actually revoked talk page access. Tol  (talk &#124; contribs) @ 15:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Ouch! Sometimes you remember to log it but not check the actual box ... maybe someone should add a script to the block page that takes note if you forget to check the box. Daniel Case (talk) 18:01, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Don't worry; it happens to everyone. A script to do that would be convenient! Tol  (talk &#124; contribs) @ 18:50, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Romulus and Remus (Rubens)
Добрый день! Хорошо было если бы кто-нибудь дополнил статью, спасибо!--Станислав Савченко (talk) 12:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Template
Hey I started a fire tower template today: User:420Traveler/sandbox7. Since you have comtributed to many fire tower articles as well, I was wondering if you had any suggestions or anything. Thanks -420Traveler (talk) 16:02, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Also, would Fingerboard Mountain be considered in the Hudson Highlands? -420Traveler (talk) 15:23, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

ACE2021
Hello!

Due to some technical difficulties on your vote in this year's ACE, it was necessary to strike it. As such, you will need to vote again.

I apologize for the inconvenience.

On behalf of the scrutineers, — Thanks for the fish!  talk •contribs  20:09, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

WP:LTA/TFD
I think we need to bring out the rangeblocks again for this vandal. Here's what I've calculated:

Also pinging, , , and as people who may be interested in this. wizzito &#124;  say hello!  13:33, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

And  wizzito  &#124;  say hello!  13:37, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jeremy Strong (actor), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Brian Cox and DreamWorks.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Parable of the drowning man
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC)


 * theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 07:26, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Wow ... thanks for letting me know, and taking care of this at WP:DYKSTATS. I didn't think it would do this well with the less catchy hook. But I guess people were hungry for the article about it. Daniel Case (talk) 18:13, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
 * (: just goes to show, an interesting fact can be hookier than hooky sometimes! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 18:17, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Dec 15: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team 18:51, 13 December 2021 (UTC)