User talk:Juliancolton/Archive 17

Tropical storms
Please see my talk page for a reply. I'm not sure I understand the reasoning here. Dekimasu よ! 04:43, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Tropical cyclone FA
I figure a lot of it must be your work :D so congrats. And when I said "nice collage", i didn't mean "stick it on the fraking main page" nice >_< [j/k]  Benders  Game  14:27, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

AfD
Which sources passed WP:GNG? --Jimbo[online] 08:11, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * To me it looks like concensus was delete. The arguments for keep were flawed. Anyways, I'll take it up at DRV later. --Jimbo[online] 13:42, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Bias or not, when I explained why the references fail WP:N, with no decent counter argument except "References look good to me". --Jimbo[online] 15:17, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * That's just a statement of the hierarchy of notability criteria. They didn't say what part of the article passed WP:N, just the fact that it overrides WP:ATHLETE. --Jimbo[online] 17:56, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Usenet flood
Would you userfy Usenet flood for me? It was on my todo list but with that other stuff going on I wasn't able to finish even half of the draft I had going. Thanks! Tothwolf (talk) 16:55, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for coming out!
I would like to thank you for coming out and participating in my Request for Adminship, which closed unsuccessfully at  (48/8/6) based on my withdrawal. I withdrew because in my opinion I need to focus on problems with my content contributions before I can proceed with expanding my responsibilities. I completely understand your justification for switching from support to oppose. Overall I feel that the RfA has improved me as an editor and in turn some articles which in my eyes is successful. Thank you again for your support/opposition. Cheers and happy editing. --kelapstick (talk) 17:44, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

GA Sweeps June update
Thanks to everyone's dedicated efforts to the GA Sweeps process, a total of 396 articles were swept in May! That more than doubles our most successful month of 163 swept articles in September 2007 (and the 2 articles swept in April)! I plan to be sending out updates at the beginning of each month detailing any changes, updates, or other news until Sweeps are completed. So if you get sick of me, keep reviewing articles so we can be done (and then maybe you'll just occasionally bump into me). We are currently over 60% done with Sweeps, with just over a 1,000 articles left to review. With over 40 members, that averages out to about 24 articles per person. If each member reviews an article a day this month (or several!), we'll be completely finished. I know that may be asking for a lot, but it would allow us to complete Sweeps and allow you to spend more time writing GAs, reviewing GANs, or focusing on other GARs (or whatever else it is you do to improve Wikipedia) as well as finish ahead of the two-year mark coming up in August. I recognize that this can be a difficult process at times and appreciate your tenacity in spending time in ensuring the quality of the older GAs. Feel free to recruit other editors who have reviewed GANs in the past and might be interested in the process. The more editors, the less the workload, and hopefully the faster this will be completed. If you have any questions about reviews or the process let me know and I'll be happy to get back to you. Again, thank you for taking the time to help with the process, I appreciate your efforts! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 18:07, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Deletion review for Samuel Galindo
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Samuel Galindo. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. --Jimbo[online] 20:13, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

I do appreciate your work
...and I understand where you're coming from concerning the updating of current articles, like the 2009 Atlantic hurricane season. But, isn't that the point of current class, to point out current articles which need constant updates? I do appreciate some of the older articles you've worked on such as the 1941 Florida hurricane article and ones I started but never completed such as the 1994 Christmas Nor'easter article. My comments are not reflective of what I think of your work, merely how I read the wikipedia standards, and how they seem to apply to the TC project. And yes, I'm very frustrated at how little attention most of the older season articles and older storms appear to get. Thegreatdr (talk) 21:05, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I have no strong opinions regarding articles on fish storm Alfalfa or fish spinner Ollie. If people want to create them, fine.  But I do think our focus as a project should lie on the retirees before we address even the most efficient SST-dropping/ocean-blending cyclone.  However, our attempts at working on Camille together didn't last all that long, did they?  It's interesting how we all collaborated quite well on the tropical cyclone article, but Camille remains chicken liver.  Thegreatdr (talk) 21:19, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

How Can I Put In Pictures?
It's me, Typingwestern 015. I need your help again. I know how to add in userboxes. I even created some of my own. Here's the problem: What about pictures? How do I create new ones for Wikipedia? Tell me, please. Typingwestern015 (talk) 22:06, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia Signpost : 1 June 2009 ==


 * From the editor: Browsing the archives
 * Book review: Review of The Future of the Internet
 * Scientology: End of Scientology arbitration brings blocks, media coverage
 * News and notes: Picture of the Year, Wikipedia's first logo, Board elections, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Tamil Wikipedia, Internet Watch Foundation, and more
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:34, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Outlines at Wikicup?
Julian,

I've been asking lots of mentors over at WP:ADOPT for advice, and User:Garden replied with this one: "include some kind of reward at next year's WikiCup"

You're in Wikicup, right?

How would we go about what Garden has suggested?

(I've also asked Thehelpfulone, because I think he's in it too).

 Th e Tr ans hu man ist   03:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)


 * What would we have to do to get them included?  Th e Tr ans hu man ist    03:31, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi
I have made a request for New Page Watcher here. Could you please check it and approve me if i am eligible.  - Subash  Chandran  007  ׀  sign!  09:06, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Hey!
I see you just updated the admin coaching page with space for one more is that correct. Otis Jimmy  One  03:29, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * That's great, I asked Academic Challenger to Coach me earlier but s/he doesn't look as active as you are. Thanks Otis  Jimmy  One  03:39, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey Julian i've created User:Otisjimmy1/Coaching and added what you requested. Best, Otis  Jimmy  One  23:17, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Big Thank You!
It's me, Typingwestern015. I finally posted my own picture! Come and see! You must also see my science fiction novel, the concept of a nuclear volcanic meltdown, and these userboxes I made. You'll love it! Seriously, you will. Typingwestern015 (talk) 18:01, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Admin Coach
Hi there before putting in an application I was wondering if you could if you have time look through my contribs and see if I would be able to apply to be an admin. I have the minimum basics like participating in XFDs and closing/helping with requests on the help desk. Corruptcopper (talk) 20:19, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Just thought I'd butt in since I'm not sure if JC is here -- a lot of people will oppose if you almost only use Huggle and other automated tools (which is what I see). Audited content work is pretty much a must, or it is highly unlikely that you would pass. I disagree that content work is the be all and end all of adminship, but it seems a lot of people disagree with me, too. — neuro  (talk)  20:21, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that we will continue the discussion on my talkpage if you want as I woul like to know what you mean 'Audited work' Corruptcopper (talk) 20:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * In accordance with point six of Julian's editnotice I'd rather keep messages here. By 'audited content work', I mean GA/FA/FL/DYK, etc. Your unfamiliarity with these processes would be your downfall in an RfA -- I don't agree with it, but it is true. — neuro  (talk)  20:26, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok cool thanks I will start to look into those areas. Corruptcopper (talk) 20:28, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for granting my rollback request (: Arteyu ?  Blame it on me ! 23:11, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Another requested move
Serbia-Venezuela relations needs an en dash. Thanks! Dabomb87 (talk) 23:57, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Algeria–Greek relations-->Algeria–Greece relations per WikiProject International relations. Stay tuned! Dabomb87 (talk) 00:02, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Algerian–Turkish relations-->Algeria–Turkey relations. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:03, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * If there is anything you ever need, please holler. You don't know how much I appreciate having an admin around right when I want one. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:06, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete request. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:35, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Bilateral AfD closure
what do you think of this closure? Articles for deletion/Austria–Georgia relations. the discussion only yielded one source which was a primary source. and the article only has 1 reference. LibStar (talk) 00:13, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * As I said on Cirt's talk page as well. If we go by strength of arguments, it was a no consensus.  Best, --A NobodyMy talk 00:19, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I would have closed it the same way personally. A Nobody is correct. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:20, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

"No edits"
[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrator_intervention_against_vandalism%2FTB2&diff=294066439&oldid=294064098] – That's because its only edit was stopped by the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:AbuseLog&details=504470 abuse filter]. Mr.Z-man 00:55, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

pigface welcome to mexico
trent reznor does NOT sing on this LIVE cd OGRE of skinny puppy sings SUCK on this one ... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.183.204.139 (talk) 01:19, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * That would be a violation of the second bullet point at the top of this page.  ceran  thor 01:38, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Protection of WP:BLPN
Whilst vandalism of this talk page is bad, it should not be protected from IP editors, who should be able to raise BLP concerns on this noticeboard. I think protecting this page is wrong. Martin 4 5 1  (talk) 02:27, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Capital District compilation image
You input would be appreciated.  wadester 16  04:03, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Congrats!
Ask and you shall receive, congrats! Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; ° ° 14:03, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Greater Manchester June Newsletter, Issue XVI
Nev1 (talk) 14:19, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Greater Manchester June Newsletter, Issue XVI
Nev1 (talk) 14:20, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of My user page
Could i please have a copy of my userpage that you deleted without letting me know. Id like to see the Vandalism on it. Avatar 06349 (talk) 11:51, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It's really not worth it. It just contained "F you". — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:22, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * my point is he never bothered to let me know about said vandalism or deletion so id like to still see it and who the vandal was. Avatar 06349 (talk) 11:31, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Deletion to be completed
Hi, you have done a good job in deleting the pages "Michele Trimarchi" and his personal interpretation' of "Neuropsychophysiology". But in the present page of Neuropsychophysiology (that is much more correct, indeed!) there are still two links to ISN (the site of Michele Trimarchi!!) that, in its turn, is a completely non-notable institute. As a matter of fact, it is a self-referential, blatant private organization whose founder (M.Trimarchi) is nor a doctor neither a psychologist, but someone looking for legitimation and visibility. The scientific discipline of neuropsychophysiology is something apart! Please, delete these two links and only then it will be possible to widen the article in a science-based objective manner. Thank you PernillaPthor  —Preceding unsigned comment added by PernillaPthor (talk • contribs) 17:42, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Blatant COI
This article in its entirety has been created and edited by. This and the Julian Koltun article are clear demonstrations of the barefaced greed of some cabals (which I shall not name here). It is obvious that wikipedia is worlds biggest force for libel and burying the truth for jimbo's insidious personal profit and to forward NewWorldOrder's agenda. WAKE UP SHEEPLE!! RESIST THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT! VOTE RON PAUL! OBAMA IS A HALF HUMAN HALF CLOTH! MOVE TO LIBERTARIAN PARADISE: SOMALIA!!  Benders  Game  17:47, 3 June 2009 (UTC) (Decided against posting it on the article talk page :P )

Admin Coaching
I have answered your questions at User:Permethius/Admin coaching.Cheers!-- Þέŗṃέłḥìμŝ LifeDeath 19:15, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I am sorry, it was wrong. I realize that. Is there anyway I can redo those plagued questions?Again, I am really sorry and that is not a way an admin acts. Truthfully ,very sorry-- Þέŗṃέłḥìμŝ LifeDeath 23:05, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks man. These answers will be from me. Cheers!-- Þέŗṃέłḥìμŝ LifeDeath 23:08, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I have done it. All me. Cheers!-- Þέŗṃέłḥìμŝ LifeDeath 23:21, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Today's featured article/June 10, 2009
First word (video-game name) needs to be italicized. Thanks, as always, Dabomb87 (talk) 19:35, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, and in case you weren't aware, Today's featured article/June 9, 2009. Congrats! Dabomb87 (talk) 19:40, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for rollback
Self-explanatory.:) I promise to use it effectively and for its intended purpose. just a little   insignificant  21:29, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Fans of yours?
Not sure if you guys know who this is, but User:Juliancolton for de-admlnship and User:Pgk for de-admlnship showed up in the new-user logs recently. They have both since been blocked. Cheers. --Ckatz chatspy  23:53, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

BLP cats
OHHH .. am I just supposed to remove the section when I'm done? I had been just tagging them. — Ched : ?  03:44, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Ahh .. OK .. gotcha. One less step then, no need for someone to review.  Will do. thx — Ched :  ?  03:51, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

When you get a chance, would you have a look at a few for me? In the 14900 section of #4, I added two from the 15000 section at the bottom. I wasn't sure what to do with them. Also: Kenneth Regan (murderer) ... I added the no refs tag, but I know we're big on removal of contentious material as well. I'm not really interested in researching this article, so is there anything else I should do? thanks Julian .. you've been a big help! — Ched : ?

Article deleted
Hi,

I am just wondering why you have deleted my article even there isn't any article (following link) about "Online quantitative market research" on wiki yet.

Online Quantitative Market Research

I am looking forward to hearing from you

Regards

Eric —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.83.147.114 (talk) 09:53, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

RE: RE: G-Forces Web Management Deletion
I wasn't asking about that particular page i was asking about why i didnt recieve notification about the deletion of my Userpage and i was requesting a copy of my page so i could reload it without the vandalism. a revert would have been ok not a complete deletion. Avatar 06349 (talk) 13:49, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Help
My account has been compromised. My username is Wireless Keyboard. Can you restore my account? I can prove that this account is me because I have a SHA-512 commitment on my identity. The code is: I like moo cows a lot.. Can you please restore my account. Can you also get a checkuser or someone to investigate my account. I believe that Pekayer11 is behind my account compromise. We know each other personally, and has spread rumors on hacking my account. Please help! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Class I Laser (talk • contribs) 14:29, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

RE: G-Forces Web Management Deletion
It was here – G-Forces Web Management —Preceding unsigned comment added by TonusHillius (talk • contribs) 15:39, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Malta – Poland relations
Hi, you closed the deletion discussion but no action has been taken on the article itself (though this may be some cache issue on my side). This just a note in case you missed a step while busily doing a bunch of other othings. Best.Bali ultimate (talk) 16:04, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Adminship
Thanks for your kind words. I have been asked once before to consider adminship, but declined. My primary goal is creating and improving articles, which I can do as a regular editor. It would be nice sometimes to be able to delete and protect articles, but I don't see myself ever being an extremely active admin. On the other hand, I hope I could make a pretty compelling case that I wouldn't abuse the tools either, and the community's expression of confidence in the fact that I'm here for good and not ill would be validating, I suppose. I notice that you are an admin. What do you find to be the best and worst parts of the job? Acdixon (talk • contribs • count) 17:04, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Date of death unknown/missing vs Year of death missing
Hi. Concerning [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ken_Sier&diff=294372190&oldid=280712278 this edit of yours] I would to note that Category:Date of death unknown should be placed in talk pages only. Please read instructions in the category's page. This is a common mistake editors do. For article pages prefer the Category:Year of death missing. "Unknown" is not the same with "missing". "Unknown" refers to situations that the date is really unknown and unlikely to be found. Thanks, Magioladitis (talk) 18:33, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Oops – move request
First, please don't slap me with a trout. :)

Please rename the page:

Category:Articles belonging to WikiProject Index

(groan, per WP:OWN)

To:

Category:WikiProject Index articles

Thank you.

Good luck.

Have fun.

 Th e Tr ans hu man ist   20:41, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Re: move request
I'm not sure how to move categories, actually... – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 20:49, 4 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I've already moved the entries, by changing the template WikiProject Index. (Though it takes time for the server to catch up).


 * All I need you to do is rename the page itself.


 *  Th e Tr ans hu man ist   21:15, 4 June 2009 (UTC)


 * As far as I know, it's not technically possible to rename category pages, but you could just recreate it under the new title and redirect the old one. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 21:18, 4 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I think you are right. For an example of how it should look, see Category:Articles belonging to WikiProject Outline of knowledge.   Th e Tr ans hu man ist    21:23, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

BLP merge
I'll take a look at this later tonight if it's not already been addressed – your thoughts? — Ched : ?  20:52, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * To check on: Merge Keith Miller with Keith Miller in the 1946–47 Australian cricket season?

Remember the 50-tasks-in-one?
I need you to find and resurrect it. I can't remember what it is called or when I posted it to you.

 Th e Tr ans hu man ist   00:40, 5 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Here? I'm pretty sure I removed about 99% of the bad links by fixing a few templates. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:45, 5 June 2009 (UTC)


 * These "historical outline of" articles still have the old links:


 * Arizona • Arkansas • California • Colorado • Connecticut • Delaware • Florida • Georgia • Hawaii • Idaho • Illinois • Indiana • Iowa • Kansas • Kentucky • Louisiana • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Minnesota • Mississippi • Missouri • Montana • Nebraska • Nevada • New Hampshire • New Jersey • New Mexico • New York • North Carolina • North Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • Pennsylvania • Rhode Island • South Carolina • South Dakota • Tennessee • Texas • Utah • Vermont • Virginia • Washington • West Virginia • Wisconsin • Wyoming


 * And so do these "List of x state symbols" articles:


 * Arizona • Arkansas • California • Colorado • Connecticut • Delaware • Florida • Georgia • Hawaii • Idaho • Illinois • Indiana • Iowa • Kansas • Kentucky • Louisiana • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Minnesota • Mississippi • Missouri • Montana • Nebraska • Nevada • New Hampshire • New Jersey • New Mexico • New York • North Carolina • North Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • Pennsylvania • Rhode Island • South Carolina • South Dakota • Tennessee • Texas • Utah • Vermont • Virginia • Washington • West Virginia • Wisconsin • Wyoming


 * (not the red ones, of courese)


 * I'm still looking.


 *  Th e Tr ans hu man ist   00:58, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

RfC for corporate usernames
I have created an RfC for a proposed change to the username policy in regards to corporate names. I invite your input. Thanks. Gigs (talk) 01:20, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)
The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:05, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/List of football players from small colleges
Juliancolton, I noticed you closed this AFD and deleted the article. Along with the initial article, I had also nominated List of basketball players from small colleges within the same AFD. — X96lee15 (talk) 03:24, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Small AWB task – search/replace comment prose
For the articles listed at User:The Transhumanist/Sandbox42...

Please replace:

"Leave this line in place"

with:

"LEAVE THIS LINE IN PLACE"

(without the quotes)

It's in a hidden comment, and so the caps serve as bold print. It's important that that part be seen.

Thank you.

Good luck.

Have fun.

 Th e Tr ans hu man ist   03:49, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

We didn't say "please"
Please do another pass, and...

Replace:

"LEAVE THIS LINE IN PLACE"

with:

"PLEASE LEAVE THIS LINE IN PLACE"

Thank you.

Good luck.

Have fun.

 Th e Tr ans hu man ist   21:41, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

User:Arpitakapoor123
I saw this page and was just wondering if I should nominate it for MFD? I asked the user to take it down but I am just not sure. Thanks Otis  Jimmy  One  17:27, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, I will.
 * About the admin coaching i'm in no rush. Thanks, Otis  Jimmy  One  17:39, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

re-instate Barney B. Rasor's Article —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitchamz (talk • contribs) 21:34, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

eyes please
Sometime when you get the chance, would you take a look at Talk:Karol Sabath. I started the page, and think I got the cats right, but a more experienced set of eyes double checking wouldn't hurt. Thanks Julian – just let me know if I start pestering too much – I know you have your own work to do here too. ;) — Ched : ?  00:00, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Ahhh .. listas ... I had done that once or twice in the metadata thing .. I'll remember that.  Thanks ;) — Ched :  ?  00:07, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Admin coaching
Hi. I see by your recent edits to Admin coaching/Status that you have an available slot for a student. Would you be interested in coaching me? Thanks! — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 00:14, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting that tired, old insult on my talk page. I had the block page all loaded and ready to go with that editor, but I guess I can close the tab now. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:42, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Userfy request
Would it be possible for you to move the article deleted through this AfD to my user space? I'm doing some categorizing/tagging work and think the list would be useful for that purpose. Thanks in advance. Strikehold (talk) 04:17, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Dabomb87 (talk) 04:20, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Empty RfA pages
Hi Juliancolton. I've seen you around RfAs a lot, and I was wondering if you knew what to do with this empty RfA page created by an indefinitely blocked sock puppet. The nominating statement is simply "top user", and the nominee was not even notified of the nomination. I'm thinking it should be deleted, but I am not familiar with the process for dealing with such pages. Tim meh  ! ( review me ) 04:22, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Reply to question
Well, not quite dozens, only about one dozen so far. They're created in my userspace because that is the only way to edit in peace without being harassed by a band of 8-10 editors who don't like my layouts and have made a crusade of stalking my contributions. They claim to have community consensus, despite dissenting opinions, and have gone as far as trying to impose an illegal restriction on my edits – see here and here. Logically their vendetta doesn't hold much water – if they truly believe that their style preferences are also those of the community, then they need only step back and let some other editor revert when he comes across what he thinks to be a glaring travesty of the MoS. However, I think they have tainted any claims they might have had to impartiality by their obsessive behaviour. Rotational (talk) 08:17, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

New Member
I was invited by Jason Rees to WPTC, so how can I contribute to the project? Are there things I need to know? Darren23 (talk) 13:38, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

RfA thanks
Mifter (talk) 23:43, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Request
Please copy or move the deleted article Outline of Islamic and Muslim related topics to my user space. I'd like to see if it comes close to what we're working on now.  Th e Tr ans hu man ist   01:22, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Why did you delete the list of Dameshek Podcasts?
Weaksauce. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.83.106.119 (talk) 02:41, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Hey
I answered those questions for you. Otis Jimmy  One  08:17, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Re:Invite
Thanks, but no thanks for me. I'd be glad to help prose-wise, and I might be interested in bringing some articles to GA.  ceran  thor 14:23, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Questions
I have completed all the questions in my words. Cheers!-- Þέŗṃέłḥìμŝ LifeDeath 14:43, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
- Dank (push to talk) 14:52, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Newsletter
Why are the stats in the latest Hurricane Herald are from September-December. Darren23 (talk) 16:51, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

RFR-SMG

 * Thanks...just please do me one last thing...just count all the TOTAL REVERTS I did TOTAL...not from the last time and all the warning messages on vandal talkpages as we and then I'll leave you alone. Schnitzel MannGreek . 01:22, 8 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Anyway, I need to calm down so I might be retiring for a while but I'll still check my page. I need to regain my lost confidence on wikipedia...I actually thought I was improving after my TOTAL 30 Reverts and dealing with vandals through warning templates and stuff and designing my userpage(feel free to visit).Guess I'm just worthless. Schnitzel MannGreek . 01:34, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

BS Report Podcasts Article
Why was this deleted?

List of 'Eye of the Sports Guy' and 'B.S. Report' Podcasts —Preceding unsigned comment added by Themike5454 (talk • contribs) 02:44, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Themike5454 (talk) 01:39, 8 June 2009 (UTC) Themike5454

Why was the article indexing "The B.S. Report" deleted?
Former article link: List of 'Eye of the Sports Guy' and 'B.S. Report' Podcasts  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.61.80.118 (talk) 02:40, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

I can find no good reason for deleting the article that indexed the podcast "The B.S. Report" by Bill Simmons. Wikipedia finds it acceptable to keep an index of TV shows, containing a list of episodes with a brief description. If this is allowed, why is keeping a list of podcasts with a brief description and a listening link not? Why is there an arbitrary distinction between a TV show and a podcast? The page for the B.S. Report contained links to several older podcasts that are not available on ESPN.com or the iTunes archive. It was a useful resource that did not need to be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CComp (talk • contribs) 02:25, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Outline update – Good news and bad news – 06/08/2009
The big push continues.

And it seems to be working!

The good news is that there's growing support for outlines, and there are more editors than ever editing them!

The bad news is that the complainers are disproportionately represented on the project's various talk pages. While many editors work diligently on the front end, a handful of complainers are trying to tear down the project behind the scenes. Fortunately, barely enough supporters have been watching those pages that no consensus for moving or merging the outlines has succeeded. So far...

Big problem: ignorance of what outlines are for and their benefits
Most of the opposition seems to be unaware of the complete range of what outlines are used for. They just don't get it.

This is why it is important to complete the outline article draft. An article with a comprehensive treatment of outlines would be the perfect place to refer anybody unfamiliar with outlines to.

Opposers also don't seem to understand how outlines differ from some other page type that they prefer. Some think articles are good enough as an overview, others think portals are more in-depth, still others think categories or navigation boxes are the most efficient and useful way to organize and present topical information. Some have simply never seen an "Outline of" page before and think they are a new type of page (they've been around under other names since 2001).

If you run across anyone who doesn't understand the role of outlines on Wikipedia, Why do we have outlines in addition to...? might help reduce their misconceptions or uncertainties about outlines.

On the bright side, you've got to see this...
To add the outlines and related support pages to your watchlist (takes less than 30 seconds), cut and paste them from WikiProject Outline of knowledge/Watchlist into your raw watchlist. For a way to improve the display of your watchlist – by namespace (very useful) – see Watchlist sorter, or use the "super fast upgrade" at WP:OTS.

Or go to WikiProject Outline of knowledge/Watchlist using Related changes (currently without the talk pages) and click on "Related changes" in the toolbox menu on the sidebar on the left side of your screen.

The big push
The big push started with about a thousand banners and notices being placed on article talk pages all over Wikipedia.

But it didn't stop there...

Welcome our new members...
The following Wikipedians have joined the OOK team.

Be sure to stop by their talk pages and introduce yourselves.


 * Tarheel95 – going after the Main Page.
 * Vivio Testarossa / Feinoha – here to help.
 * Burningview – made a splash at MfD with WikiProject Outline of knowledge/Drafts/Outline of British Columbia (see the talk page for the MfD link – lots of support there).

Enter the mentors!
I asked a bunch of mentors at WP:ADOPT for advice. Several of them answered on my talk page. Most of those who replied were happy to help, and posted some very good ideas. A couple even joined the project.

Here are their ideas, and what is being done about them. A few of the tasks still need volunteers:


 * Strdst grl: Create and place project banners – already ✅
 * Strdst grl & The Earwig: put an animated ad for the project in WP:BANNER – Our graphics specialist Penubag is looking into it.
 * Strdst grl: Create a userbox for the project – assigned to Penubag.
 * Garden: Ask to have outlines added to next year's WikiCup competition - ✅ (proposal posted)
 * Tarheel95: Add a link to Portal:Contents/Outline of knowledge to the Main Page – Tarheel95 is taking on the creation of the proposal
 * SriMesh: Create an outreach subpage to WPOOK - ✅ (invitation coming soon, see below)
 * SriMesh: (Create a newsletter archive subpage) - ✅
 * SriMesh: Add a feed to AlexNewArtBot to gather links to new outlines and post them on a page. Then personally invite new creators to the project. - who wants to tackle the feed?
 * SriMesh: Assign someone to monitor the outlines via watchlist, and invite new outline editors to the project – any volunteers?
 * Related: Create an invitation – Penubag is working on it.
 * SriMesh: Create Template:Expand outline similar to Template:Expand list, which adds each outline it is posted on to Category:Incomplete outlines, where editors (who are browsing the categories) can find them and work on them – to be assigned
 * SriMesh: Add the above template to incomplete outlines – upcoming AWB task
 * The Earwig: "Tell your wikifriends about it" – I've told mine, have you told yours?
 * The Earwig: "Collaborate with other WikiProjects" – we've been doing this from the start (each outline is associated with at least one other WikiProject).
 * : move the projected outline to a subpage of WP:WPOOK - ✅

Linking to outlines has begun
To the tops of about 30 subject articles, I placed a test batch of hatnotes leading to the corresponding outlines. The hatnotes look like this:


 * For a topical guide to this subject, see Outline of X.(Hidden: <!- PLEASE LEAVE THIS LINE IN PLACE because it leads to the page that serves as the table of contents for Wikipedia's overall coverage of this subject. Thank you.-->

The rationale for the hatnotes is that each outline is a topical guide for its subject, and since tables of contents go at the front of a book, a link to each outline should be placed at the front of its subject.

Unfortunately, not all editors agree. Some of the hatnotes have already disappeared. :(

Some past discussions pertaining to the existence or location of outlines
Note that the "Lists of topics" are of two types, including outlines and indexes, so discussions to remove, move, or merge those are usually relevant to the OOK. Also, outlines are a type of list, so discussions that affect lists in general also pertain to outlines. We've got to be on our toes!


 * Move navigational lists to portal namespace
 * Articles for deletion/Outline of Islamic and Muslim related topics
 * Articles for deletion/Outline of South Africa
 * Articles for deletion/List of basic visual arts and design topics
 * Articles for deletion/List of basic mining topics
 * Articles for deletion/List of basic management topics
 * Articles for deletion/List of basic industrial topics
 * Articles for deletion/List of basic computer science topics
 * Articles for deletion/List of basic Canada topics
 * User talk:The Transhumanist/Archive 21
 * Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Outline of knowledge/Drafts/Outline of British Columbia
 * Talk:Switzerland
 * [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Outline_of_science&diff=291368360&oldid=286022635 Outline of science converted to redirect by Dbachmann]
 * Village pump (policy)/Archive 64
 * Administrators' noticeboard/Archive193
 * Village pump (proposals)/Archive 47

I've excluded links to live discussions, out of respect for WP:CANVASS.

Table of contents to OOK-related stuff
Here's a directory of outline support pages:


 * Portal:Contents/Outline of knowledge
 * Lists
 * WP:CLN
 * Stand-alone lists
 * Outlines
 * Why do we have outlines in addition to...?
 * Comparison of Wikipedia's and Britannica's outlines of knowledge
 * WP:WPOOK
 * WikiProject Outline of knowledge/Projected outline

Keep up the great work!
 Th e Tr ans hu man ist   03:23, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

COI
Hey there. I have been working on an article for the past couple of hours to which I have a conflict of interest. I wondered if you could possibly look it over before I post it to the mainspace, and just check if I need to do anything with it. Link: User:NuclearWarfare/DemiDec. Thanks, NW ( Talk ) 04:05, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Cant we just speedy it? Or as people would say: "nuke" it?  Benders  Game  04:11, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Article being worked on, not sure if it is correct
I have an article under construction as a subpage of my personal page. I would like some help making sure that the article is:
 * 1) ready for posting
 * 2) properly "wikified"
 * 3) in accordance with all policies
 * 4) et alii —Preceding unsigned comment added by Poker5463 (talk • contribs) 15:42, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Florida Schooner
I think we'd have a pretty good shot at a fair use rationale. I think we've both searched extensively enough to reveal that there are no free images available of the storm damage. I would personally call the image "historically significant," but I'm hardly an expert on fair use. I'd recommend posting at WP:MCQ and seeing what the regulars there have to say. Cool3 (talk) 16:32, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I've uploaded a slightly different version of the image, cropped around the schooner so that it shows less of the background (File:Florida Hurricane Schooner.jpg), which I believe would go better in the article. If you think we need to, I could also shrink the resolution, but I think it's acceptable as is.  If you agree that this version is an improvement, then we can add it into the article and delete the other.  If you prefer the other version, then you can delete the one I just uploaded (consider it a G7). Cool3 (talk) 18:41, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Cuban schooner floirda storm.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Cuban schooner floirda storm.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:06, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Featured article candidates/1941 Florida hurricane/archive3
I hope you don't mind that I took the liberty of responding to a few of the comments left by Laser brain on the FAC, as they pertained largely to bits that I had contributed. I realized after I did it that it may have been a breach of etiquette, but I hope I didn't step on your toes. As regards my own comments there, once you put together the new information on the rainfall pattern, I'll be happy to enthusiastically support. Hope that 3rd time's the charm for you on this one! Cool3 (talk) 21:03, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * How very gracious of you. Perhaps I'll collect another little star for the top row of my userpage, though even then I'll have nowhere near as many as you :). Cool3 (talk) 21:20, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Cyclone Studios


A couple of weeks ago, you deleted this article per an expired prod in which I proposed. User came to my talk page expressing his disappointment in the deletion [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MuZemike&diff=294344869&oldid=294041599] and [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MuZemike&diff=294540246&oldid=294399975] (I just remembered this situation when another user came up to me today about another AFD). I directed the creator to talk with you about restoration of the article in some sort, but that has not happened. Usually, this is the same as contesting a prod a the opposes after the deletion. Is it possible that we can have the article restored, and if I feel it still does not meet the notability guidelines, take it to AFD if need be? Thank you, MuZemike 21:36, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Tropical Storm Nana (2008)
The ArticleHistory status there is a mess; there were at least two failed GA noms that weren't documented correctly or at all. Can you take care of it? Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 22:13, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * P.S. If you don't have it already, User:Dr pda/articlehistory.js makes it a hell of a lot easier to do this. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:15, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Crows Zero 2
Hi, I was wondering why you deleted the article for the movie "Crows Zero 2"? Sarawinnie1 (talk) 23:54, 8 June 2009 (UTC)Sara

WPOOK advert banner under development, here's the beta...


Penubag needs feedback.

I've posted a few changes for him to make to it.

Please post additional comments and suggestions for him at User talk:Penubag.

Thank you.

 Th e Tr ans hu man ist   02:06, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Re:February 2009 tornado outbreak
Julian, this is too much information in the infoxboxes, most of which has nothing to do with tornado damage. I removed it and added the official paths and you reverted it. I was not vandalizing it. Showtime2009 (talk) 02:33, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Need help explaining WikiCup proposal
I posted a proposal to add outlines to next year's WikiCup, and nobody there seems to understand outlines.

Help.

 Th e Tr ans hu man ist   04:10, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

A. Andrew Gonzalez article deletion
Hi!

I see that you've deleted the A. Andrew Gonzalez entry. I would urge you to do any level of research into the Visionary Art Movement. You will find that he's one of 5 or 6 artists considered to be in the vanguard of the movement.

As for the tone of the article, I would be happy to change the tone if I could ascertain exactly what's wanted. Alternatively, feel free to "mercilessly edit" the entry or to assign another editor to do the same.

However, if you still feel that the entry doesn't merit Wikipedia inclusion, I will abide by that. I did not create the entry, and I suspect that someone will nominate him for inclusion again at some point in the future. Puroprana (talk) 16:50, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

A. Andrew Gonzalez sources
Thanks for your quick and friendly reply. Have you looked at the Publications section? He's included in several collections of the top visionary/fantastic artists, as well as in an international visionary/fantastic encyclopedia. His work was shown at a number of publicly funded museums and galleries in Australia and is in the collection for the upcoming Nederlands visionary and fantastic art museum. The 2010 calendar of his work being released next month will be available at Barnes & Noble, Powell's Books, etc. I'm honestly confused. What would constitute sources establishing notability in an art movement this new? Thanks in advance for your time. Puroprana (talk) 17:38, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

1941 Florida Hurricane
Likewise. It was a pleasure working with you on the article. Congratulations for hitting 20 FAs, that's quite a milestone. Cool3 (talk) 18:38, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'll join. Why not?  I can't say that I know much about meteorology, but I must admit that I enjoyed working on that article. Cool3 (talk) 02:14, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm up for a collaboration any time. Got anything you're working on at the moment or would like to work on? Cool3 (talk) 03:10, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Comment.
Well, why doesn't BW just make the comment, instead announcing his intention to make it [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Snowded&diff=295373658&oldid=295373552]. That's trolling in my book. 93.107.214.17 (talk) 20:04, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I usually do, but I kind of know BW. 93.107.214.17 (talk) 20:06, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Hurricane Faith (1966)
Could you move Hurricane Faith to hurricane Faith (1966) as the storm was not retired. -- An ' ha ' mi  rak  20:40, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Outline collaboration!
As you know, Penubag is working on a banner to advertise the Outline WikiProject. And he's almost done.

The banner prominently presents the "Outline of chocolate", which of course will become the most widely advertised outline as soon as the banner goes live. The first thing many editors will do after seeing the banner is look for that outline.

The problem is, we don't have one.

So that's our first outline collaboration!

I started a draft this morning.

It needs to be finished and moved to the article namespace before we can start using Penubag's banner ad!

Come join in on the fun. It's chocolate!

 Th e Tr ans hu man ist   21:48, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Those 50 AWB tasks
Would it be possible to write a string of regex to replace the state-by-state find and replace selections? – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 18:35, 9 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I think so.


 * Post a question at Wikipedia talk:AutoWikiBrowser. I'm sure someone there will know.   Th e Tr ans hu man ist    22:22, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Estonia–Luxembourg relations
Hello, I've recently tried to restore this page to a version which can be improved upon (a non-protected, non-disambiguation page) and I wondered if I could get your opinion about whether it is currently up to the quality which we expect of every Wikipedia article. I would appreciate your comments on the article at User:Cdogsimmons/Estonia–Luxembourg relations on the talk page there, and further improvements that would get it closer to inclusion status are always welcome. Thanks.--Cdogsimmons (talk) 23:00, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Regex gadget
They've added a gadget tab in "my preferences", and there's a regex menu you can activate.

Let me know if it's any good. )

 Th e Tr ans hu man ist   23:52, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Wow.

But the documentation is confusing. If you install it via "my preferences", don't install it again via the instructions in the documentation! It will double up the menu on the sidebar. It's double on mine, and I can't get rid of the copy. :(

The menu shows up when you are in edit mode, but it will not work if you are in WikEd.

Just click on "Custom regex" and an input form will appear above your edit window. I didn't notice the damn thing right away, because you have to scroll up to see it!

Have fun.

 Th e Tr ans hu man ist   00:23, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Two emoticons for you...
[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3AJuliancolton&diff=295413212&oldid=294421111 O_O] and '( — Ed   (Talk  •  Contribs)  01:10, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't even know the person, but it seems like long-time users are leaving left and right these days. Dabomb87 (talk) 14:29, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

50-tasks-in-one, revised
Original task

The links List of x-related topics have all been cleaned off of the state historical outlines. (Deemed irrelevant, I guess).

These "List of x state symbols" articles still have them, and the links mentioned above need to be changed to "Index of x-related articles":


 * Arizona • Arkansas • California • Colorado • Connecticut • Delaware • Florida • Georgia • Hawaii • Idaho • Illinois • Indiana • Iowa • Kansas • Kentucky • Louisiana • Maine • Maryland • Massachusetts • Michigan • Minnesota • Mississippi • Missouri • Montana • Nebraska • Nevada • New Hampshire • New Jersey • New Mexico • New York • North Carolina • North Dakota • Ohio • Oklahoma • Oregon • Pennsylvania • Rhode Island • South Carolina • South Dakota • Tennessee • Texas • Utah • Vermont • Virginia • Washington • West Virginia • Wisconsin • Wyoming

(not the red ones, of course)

There are more, but those will take a manual search. I'll handle that, or will assign it to someone else. I need to save you for the AWB tasks coming up. :)

 Th e Tr ans hu man ist   01:39, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Re: 1941 Florida hurricane
Done. Dabomb87 (talk) 14:50, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Did you know
Hi, I submitted an article for DYK-Template talk:Did you know. I've seen you active there & was wondering whether you could have a look & see whether you think it's close enough to 5x expansion to be OK or not? It's only 200 words short but I'm not sure how lenient the rule is? Thanks! Dotty•• | ☎ 14:51, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for the quick response & action, much appreciated! Dotty•• | ☎ 15:31, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

An award for being everywhere!
Thanks! Yes I often make a lot of small flickr agreements, articles I've started I asked some people to change the licenses for, this is why you get certain images arriving on places like Tangier, Morocco etc. Ideally of course we wish wikipedia and flickr were united and we could use any image on that site! Dr. Blofeld      White cat 18:57, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Mooger Fooger
I placed a speedy tag on the above article and another editor came after and started an AfD what is the procedure when this happens IMO it is a speedy candidate thanks. BigDunc Talk 19:39, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It appears the editor who placed AfD is having problems with deletion tagging see User talk:LouriePieterse. BigDunc  Talk 19:44, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Rollback
Thanks for granting me rollback rights. Can you give me a quick explanation of “Rollback (AGF)”? After reading about WP:AGF and skimming through Twinkle’s documentation, I’m still not totally clear. — NRen2k5 (TALK), 02:32, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Heads up
Wikipedia talk:Username policy/Blatant Promotion RfC Gigs (talk) 02:44, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Charlie the Unicorn page
Hello Mr. Colton, I saw today that the Charlie the Unicorn page was deleted by you on June 4th of this year, and wanted to know why it was deleted. I also would like to know if there is any way another article could be written, either by me or by another author. 72.185.154.120 (talk) 04:24, 11 June 2009 (UTC)Michael Newcomer04:24, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

G-Forces Web Management Deletion
Hi. You deleted a page I had created – GForces Web Management – today despite my having found an external source to establish notability. What can be done to have this page reinstated or, if this isn't doable, how can I have prevent this happening again? 10:24, 4th June 2009

Sir;

Apparently I've noticed the page was restored and then taken down again. Once more, the sources for this man's entry into Wikipedia and his staus in the poetry community is below, noteable poet. Research and you'll see this. Also, I am noticing that some of the editors who are editing Wikipedia are listed on here yet not as published as much as Mr. Engelhardt,

Can you please explain this?

Again, Thank you.

Mr.David M.

________________________ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.0.130.211 (talk) 19:34, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Mr. Colton

Thank you. Appreciated. I will inform Mr. Engelhardt of this and ask him to update asap.

Sincerely,

David M.

06.12.09 __________ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.0.130.211 (talk) 21:51, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Regarding your deletion of "Noted American Poet R.M. Engelhardt"
To Editor Mr. Julian Colton,

Hello Mr. Colton, how are you?

I recently noticed that you have deleted an old high school-english student of mine, a well-known and widely published poet-writer named (Robert M.) R.M. Engelhardt from your Wikipedia listings and I am very disappointed by this action since Mr. Engelhardt is a poet of note and has been published in over some 100 journals & zines in the US and abroad, on the internet and mostly in print.

And also, please Note regardless of your reasons, many well known "living writers" have a presence on Blogs & MySpace as well as other social media at this moment and your assumptions are seemingly generalized.If you do a google search, here is only a fraction of what appears.

So, to help you out here is a compiled list of some R.M. Engelhardt's status in the world of poetry and a few of his achivements and I hope that you will reconsider your actions soon. This was taken alone from one of his poetry links with permission.

Thank you,

Mr.David Marhaffer Teacher-Retired Albany, NY

_____________________

R.M. ENGELHARDT:

R.M. Engelhardt : Poet~Writer~Minister, Albany, NY Albany, NY, United States www.rmengelhardt.com

Albany, NY based poet, writer & minister R.M. Engelhardt has published several books over the last decade including Nod~Logos~Alchemy~The Last Cigarette: The Collected Poems of R.M. Engelhardt & others. His current experimental book of poetry & prose is called "Versus" A poet, writer & ordained minister Engelhardt through his ideas & visions has helped to create a large amount of the Upstate, Albany, NY spoken word~poetry scene and is the host of "VoX" an Open Mic For Poets held @ The Fuze Box on every last Friday evening of each month. Thru his efforts along with such writers as Thom Francis he has created such groups the Albany Poetry Syndicate as well as Albany Poets (Now www.AlbanyPoets.com), which have left a lasting mark on the upstate NY literary scene. His work has also been published by many journals both in print including Retort, Verve, Industrial Nation, Sure! The Charles Bukowski Newsletter, Copious Amounts, Thunder Sandwich, The Angry Poet, Zygote In My Coffee, Full of Crow & many others. R.M. currently lives in Albany, NY where he is an ordained minister in spiritual humanism.

www.rmengelhardt.com http://www.bostonliterarymagazine.com/fall06poetry.html

Articles for deletion/List of MXC episodes.
Can you please explain your keep close when "wp:v states "If no reliable, third-party sources can be found for an article topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.""? -- Jeandré, 2009-06-06t11:59z


 * [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jeandr%C3%A9_du_Toit&diff=294783331&oldid=294199050 Reply.]


 * Concensus doesn't matter when wp:v says the exact opposite. wp:v is one the 4 most important policies on Wikipedia along with wp:npov, wp:nor, and wp:blp. If concensus was to keep vandalism or a copyright violation, consensus would also be trumped. -- Jeandré, 2009-06-06t14:13z


 * [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jeandr%C3%A9_du_Toit&diff=294784354&oldid=294783331 Reply.]


 * Consensus: "Some exceptions supersede consensus decisions on a page. [...] Consensus decisions in specific cases do not automatically override consensus on a wider scale – for instance, a local debate on a WikiProject does not override the larger consensus behind a policy or guideline. The WikiProject cannot decide that for the articles within its scope, some policy does not apply, unless they can convince the broader community that doing so is right. [...] Wikipedia does not base its decisions on the number of people who show up and vote; we work on a system of good reasons." Consensus and wp:v are policies. List of MXC episodes has no sources at all, not even to mention reliable, published, third party sources. -- Jeandré, 2009-06-06t14:25z


 * [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jeandr%C3%A9_du_Toit&diff=294789611&oldid=294786045 Suggestion of possible DRV.] -- Jeandré (talk), 2009-06-06t15:01z


 * Deletion review/Log/2009 June 6. -- Jeandré (talk), 2009-06-06t15:03z

Present From a Learning Wikipedian
It's me, Typingwestern015. Thanks for your help! I'd like to give you a cookie.



Typingwestern015 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Copyedit request
Will you copyedit the Met for Hurricane Boris (1996)? Leave Message ,Yellow Evan home, User:Yellow Evan/Sandbox

Tropical Storm Hermine

 * (the article I sent) Cool3 (talk) 02:46, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

The body count keeps on rising. I've found a second death related to the storm, that of Joseph Cormier (I've added the info into the article). That's a pretty interesting case with the Sheriff's Department calling it storm-related and the Coast Guard saying it wasn't. In any case, I think you should add a footnote to the death toll in the infobox saying that there were two deaths connected to the storm at least indirectly. I'm not quite sure what the convention is on placing the number of indirect deaths directly in the infobox, so I'll leave you to mull over that. Cool3 (talk) 04:51, 11 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Looks like a good way to handle it to me, good job :) Cool3 (talk) 00:57, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Given rollback...?
I noticed that[User_talk:SchnitzelMannGreek|SchnitzelMannGreek]] has been given Rollback, even though there wasn't any concenseus to give him it... see here I am just a bit confused as to how he got the Rollback feature, Frozen4322 : Chat  16:13, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Also see his contributions... here Frozen4322 : Chat  17:03, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Out of curiousity, how do you see someones user rights? Frozen4322 : Chat  17:08, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * thanks Frozen4322 : Chat  17:10, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Ched Davis
Man, you are fast!!!! Pedro : Chat  23:21, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I've been eagerly watching that page for a while now. :) – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 23:23, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

The Bridesman AfD
Howdy. You closed the above linked AfD but I don't think it was done fully. I've [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ABridesman&diff=295900751&oldid=294375423 fixed] the oldafdfull. You had the wrong date there. I also [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bridesman&diff=295900923&oldid=295890954 removed the AfD notice] on the article. Could you please check to see if I screwed either of those up? Thank you.--Rockfang (talk) 02:18, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Michael Galea
Could you please restore this article, which you deleted as an expired prod. User:Stew jones has presented evidence that this footballer played for the Maltese national team, and seems to be getting rather hot under the collar about the deletion. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:05, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

2009 AHS problem
An IP has been putting edits like this[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2009_Atlantic_hurricane_season&curid=2533094&diff=295990368&oldid=295983351] and I want to know if this edit is correct because I have been reverting edits like this and I actualy told the IP the reason I reverted it. Darren23 20:31, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Timothy Zahn's upcoming book?
hey Julian,

why did you delete the page about author Timothy Zahn writing a new Star Wars book to be published in 2011? it is true. i read about it on a few Star Wars websites. How is that being a 'crystal ball' when Del Ray says it's true?? Zahn is going to write a followup to Allegiance. just because you aren't interested doesn't mean other people won't be.

(i don't understand the MT 53 2 (talk) 20:35, 12 June 2009 (UTC), so i am doing the best i can with this direction, i gues it's wiki markup?) MT 53 2 (talk) 20:35, 12 June 2009 (UTC) MT_53_2


 * Allow me to answer for Julian here. I guess you are referring to Untitled 2011 Timothy Zahn Star Wars Book? Yes, it is true that this will be published eventually. However, our "crystal ball" policy refers to the fact that almost nothing about it is known at the moment. Once details are known and published by reliable sources (not "few Star Wars websites"), it's perfectly fine to have an article about it. Wikipedia is just not a place for speculation and at the moment, there is nothing but speculation on this book. Even to Wookiepedia entry for the book is tiny at best and they are really really Star Wars crazy over there (I admit I am too^^). So just be patient, we can have an article about the book if there is something definite to write in there. But unless there is, the fact that it will be written can be (or is) mentioned in Timothy Zahn and Allegiance (novel). Regards  So Why  20:46, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Please moderate the Regine Velasquez page. So many false claims, there are no citations.
So many users in that page keep on putting false claims about Regine Velasquez' achievements and talent, to the point that they make up fake 'achievements' about her so-called 'reign'. Velasquez is not famous all over the world, she has not sold one million records all over Asia. They keep sensationalizing her page by writing over hyped and false claims such as having a 'palatial house', albums selling over 10X platinum, that Regine rejected the Miss Saigon role, and so much more. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.104.22.195 (talk) 22:48, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

How are you going to merge that exactly?
Articles for deletion/Other characters of Xanth How exactly would you merge it? The names are already there, just not the summary of them. You can't fit a summary of all the characters listed on that page. That's why there are many side articles listing the various groups. This group was for those notable characters who didn't fit in another character. Please look at the articles, and the list at the bottom of this article listing the other character list pages.  D r e a m Focus  00:20, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I was wondering the exact same thing. Other characters of Xanth is made up of characters that don't really fit into the other character pages such as Magicians of Xanth, Family of Merlin of Xanth, Family of Ebnez of Xanth, Family of Humfrey of Xanth, Centaur family of Xanth, Goblin family of Xanth, From the Gourd of Xanth, Mundanes in Xanth, etc, which are then all linked from List of Xanth characters. This particular collection of pages really is more of an expanded glossary than individual list type articles. It certainly would be nice to have some footnotes on each page noting where the various characters were written about though. Tothwolf (talk) 03:21, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

DYK Volunteering: How Am I Doing?
Hello. I wanted to ask since you're one of the people listed in "Willing to help", but I learned something from the whole Aces and Eights fiasco. Since then, I've started trying to do hook reviews. I wanted to ask if I'm doing alright enough, in case I may want to become a participant. Thanks. Hurricane Angel Saki (talk) 06:07, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations!

 * Sorry it took so long... busy week.  wadester 16  16:57, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Regarding Wikipedia Deletion, R.M. Engelhardt
Mr. Colton,

I was told by two different friends, one an old teacher of mine & the other a fan of my work that my Wikipedia page has been deleted. To be honest, I may be a writer-poet but I have no idea how to go about re-establishing my information on here so please bear with me. I attemped to edit my page but realized that due to guidelines an author cannot submit his own work so I deleted the information.

So below, please find my current as well as updated information for any re-establishment of my page and I appreciate any assistance you can give me.

Again,

Thank you.

R.M. Engelhardt

_____________________

R.M.(Robert Michael) Engelhardt, was born in [Albany,NY] in 1964 and is an [American poet] & performance artist as well as a writer of experimental prose whose writing has been published widely throughout the United States, England and in as many as 150 or so online-internet & print journals since 1992.

Heavily influenced by such writers as [Thomas Wolfe], [Charles Bukowski] and [Arthur Rimbaud], his writing has been catagorized as ["Neo-romantic]" & in the past has been identified as an "[Apocalypse Poet]" as well as a member of "[Generation X]". He is also the author of 10 books of poetry such as "Logos,1995" "Versus, 2009" as well as his book of collected poems "The Last Cigarette- Poems By R.M. Engelhardt 1989-2006" Published by such presses as Dead Man's Press Ink.

The founder of such groups as "[Albany Poets]" along with it's current president, [Thom Francis], he was also the creator of such widely attended events in upstate NY as "The Albany WordFest" and currently still lives in his hometown Albany,NY where he is an ordained minister of Spiritual Humanism & also runs a monthly open mic for poets & poetry called "VoX" at a nightclub called The Fuze Box, formaly known in the 1980's as the legendary punk rock club, The QE2.

Poetry Links:

http://www.bostonliterarymagazine.com/fall06poetry.html#gravity.html

http://www.strangeroad.com/Poetry/RMEngelhardt.php http://www.poemhunter.com/r-m-engelhardt

http://www.retort.brentley.com/RETORT/06/id_01.06_rm_engelhardt.htm

http://www.dreamagic.com/poetry/engelhardt.html http://fullofcrow.com/rmengelhardt.html

http://www.copiousmagazine.com/archive/rme.htm http://outsiderink.com/03/spring/engelhardt.php

http://www.guttereloquence.com/issue3/engelhardt3-print.html http://www.google.com/search?

q=rm+engelhardt+poems+by&hl=en&start=50&sa=N http://gallery.poetshaven.com/search.php

http://www.thundersandwich.com/ts25/page21.html

http://www.kotapress.com/journal/Archive/Journal_V3_Issue7(Jul02)/Contents.htm

http://www.foothillspublishing.com/2005/id108.htm http://74.125.93.132/search?q=cache:e-

http://www.zygoteinmycoffee.com/60/issue67inthedysfunctional.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=foRrH7Bja7c

http://www.metroland.net/back_issues/vol25_no9/art_murmur.html

http://www.doubledarepress.net/featured-writers

http://www.metroland.net/back_issues/vol29_no42/night_and_day.html

http://www.locusmag.com/index/yr2001/l1.htm

http://www.albanypoets.com/poets/engelhardt

http://www.scribd.com/doc/15345967/An-Index-to-Penny-Dreadful-and-Songs-of-Innocence

http://thehiddencity.com/archive.html

http://www.metroland.net/guides/2004_best_of/best_of_arts.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by R.M. Engelhardt (talk • contribs) 19:52, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter XIX and XX
Delivered by The  Helpful  Bot  at 21:57, 13 June 2009 (UTC) for the WikiCup. To report errors, please leave a message on the talk page.

IRC
I have heard that WPTC has an IRC, so how do you get in it? Darren23 (talk) 23:12, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, forgot to ask, what is done in the IRC? Darren23 (talk) 23:26, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I am trying to register in IRC. When I do autoconnect, It always says "could not resolve hostname". What does this mean? Darren23 (Contribs) 23:35, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

WeDigTV AfD
Hello Julian. Could I ask for your input on the WeDigTV AfD? You've had to relist it twice now. If you could vote yay or nay perhaps we could get it out of limbo. Wlwwybrn (talk) 07:14, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Need some advice
Hi Julian, needed to talk to someone to gain perspective and I'm not trying to canvass support. I recently had an item AFD'd which I understand happens. The edit summaries struck me as uncivil and I posted to Wikiquette alerts. During the process something was said that upset me further. I posted a hastily made and hotheaded response. Later I settled down and restated and expanded my answer. Do you think that I should leave my previous response alone, apologize for the outbust or take a wikibreak with a good single malt? Shinerunner (talk) 12:55, 14 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the reply Julian. The matter was marked as stuck – which is just as well. I've extended thanks to the other contributors to the discussion save the one that irked me (he wasn't even the other party to the dispute). I think that with him I should probably avoid to keep my blood pressure down. The other party never responded but if contacted I'll try to swallow a big chunk of crow. I think the bottom line is that when I make my edits or edit summaries I'll remember this and try my best not to possibly upset another editor. Thanks again Shinerunner (talk) 20:53, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Undelete
Hey Julian. I was wondering if you could restore File:18thdye 1995.jpg and its page please. Sorry to pick you at random, but you were the first admin to pop up on my watchlist. I had express permission from the copyright holder (frame.less.dk) to use the pic and sent a copy of their mail to the proper wiki-autorities and everything. Thanks. Ceoil (talk) 17:51, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Wind
If it is anything like the two tropical cyclone FACs I was involved in, I'll need all the help I can get. Hopefully it's a smoother process, like extratropical cyclone was, so long ago. =) Thegreatdr (talk) 22:25, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

A suggestion and a request (new member task)
We have a new member on the advanced wiki-tools team. Maybe you'd like to welcome User talk:MacMed.

I've given him his first task, but I don't have much online time today (and I'm unsure how much I'll be on over the next couple of days). Would you be so kind as to check in on him from time and see how he's doing?

I'd appreciate it.

Thank you.

 Th e Tr ans hu man ist   23:10, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

X Title
Thank you very much for fully protecting it. I wanted to get it protected but that would have stopped me from solving problems at FAC. Anyway, it was needed. Thank you very very very much.-- Will C  00:23, 15 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your vote. I must agree with it not being stable. I tried my best to keep it such, but I failed. Thank you for your time, the vote, and the protection.-- Will C  00:56, 15 June 2009 (UTC)


 * No I'm fine with it. I'll begin work on it in a subpage if I'm not blocked. I just wish the user involved would unwatch the page. Because from now on, every change I make will be watched by him. It is alright, I would have opposed it myself, just too bad it will fail for something I have no control over. I'll probably wait near a month before renominating that way it will be stable.-- Will C  01:24, 15 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Would you also protect List of TNA X Division Champions? It seems the edit war is beginning to move there.-- Will C  01:46, 15 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Thank you and I will stop immediately. The list is out of date anyway.-- Will C  01:54, 15 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Also, are you still apart of the WikiCup? I know I am, but I forget all of the participants.-- Will C  01:55, 15 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Hey, you still got till almost August. I'm trying to make it. At the moment I'm top in my pool. But I was the same last month, then got pushed down. So anything can happen.-- Will C  03:10, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Likewise.-- Will C  03:15, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

WPOOK
Hi there, User:The Transhumanist suggested that you could help me with getting bot approval on an account for use with AWB. I would greatly appreciate the help if you have some free time :) Thanks, MacMed talkstalk 01:08, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

New Page Watcher Tool Requested
Hello, I recently asked for new page watcher rights and my request has not been reviewed. I would like to know if you can review it. Thank you. --ilamb94 (talk) 02:22, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Cape Verdean American
the last months there hasn't been any edit on this web page Cape Verdean American if visited cape verdean american wep pages on google yesterday and saw a few things of cape vereans in rhode island since if followed wikiproject rhode island i wanted to ask you if you could edit somethings on cape verdean american (Questchest (talk) 12:28, 15 June 2009 (UTC))

2009 inflation
What is the inflation rate for 2009. I used an inflation calc. and it said 41.9 becomes 41.5. Oh, also Cyclonebiskit told me that a costliest season thing is reasonable. Im trying to make a table in my first sandbox (go to my user page, then go to sandbox 1) It might still be empty though.Darren23 (Contribs) 17:37, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

RantMedia to stay in Wikipedia
As you were previously involved in AfD discussions regarding RantMedia and Sean Kennedy (Author), I respectfully request your attendance to the current Articles for deletion/RantMedia. I believe there have been MANY productive responses to concerns on past AfD's, but some still don't seem to agree. If there is any way you can think of improving the article, or contributing to the current AfD, I would appreciate it. Thank you very much for your time. ₪—  Ce lt ic Wonder  ( T · C ) 18:14, 15 June 2009 (UTC)  "

RantMedia AfD discussion & your accusation of "Canvassing"
As required on WP:CANVAS, my requests are notifications of current issues regarding the article in question being addressed, was done in limited posting (only to members of previous AfD discussions), and in a neutral, nonpartisan, and open manner. By definition of the WP:CANVAS, I was not canvassing, and I promise not to do so according to WP:CANVAS. I suggest you take a step back. ₪—  Ce lt ic Wonder  ( T · C ) 18:20, 15 June 2009 (UTC)  "

Leonese language
Hello, I want to notice you that an user called Rastrojo continuosly revert my work in Leonese language. Like you can see I develope a huge work in a lot of languages, I'm a meber of two language projects, and I've developed most of the page. I repeat, he has made NO CONTRIBUTION to the article. That user just revert my work. His contributions on English Wikipedia seem to be only destructives, and has done none on this article. I have referenced my contributions, and he again and again revert not only mine, but others. A lot of users have told him to stop, but he does not accept anything but his political opinion. Please, help me.--Auslli (talk) 20:57, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

WPOOK's advert banner is done!


Is it perfect? Can it be improved?

Penubag loves feedback. Please let him know if it can be further improved.

Thank you.

 Th e Tr ans hu man ist   22:55, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you
For participating in my RFA. Even though it was a compelte and utter failure, I would like to thank you for the advice. I hope that I will be better for my next RFA. Thanks, Abce2 |  Access  Denied  23:00, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

New messages
— Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 01:43, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
 7   talk   04:09, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi :]
Hello, I was wondering if you could review my contributions and see if I am getting a good start to contributing to the wikipedia community.

If this takes up too much of your time, I understand.

Thanks

-Shamis —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shamismcgillin (talk • contribs) 03:45, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Perhaps learning to sign is a good start :-) Use ~ after each post in talk pages, that way we know who wrote it. Best wishes,  Zoo Fari  06:12, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia Signpost : 15 June 2009 ==


 * Book review :Review of Cyberchiefs: Autonomy and Authority in Online Tribes
 * News and notes: License update, Google Translate, GLAM conference, Paid editing
 * Wikipedia in the news: In the Google News, London Review of Books, and more
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject Chemistry
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 11:41, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Could you please....
... have a look at this? I don't want to enter in an edit war, and I won't but... could you please have a look? Regards! Rastrojo (talk) 13:03, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

List of members of the Commonwealth of Nations
I see you have put some note on your reversion of my edit of the above. Are you a Moderator etc? Does your note mean that if I revert your edit, I will be suspended etc? The edit concerned was discussed at some lenght here: Talk:Commonwealth of Nations. The "dispute" is about the insistence of 1 or 2 editors on putting "joining dates" on the membership of the Commonwealth of countries like Canada. They do not provide proper sources for their edits. Can you help resolve the dispute or does your edit mean that the inaccurate "dates" must be included and my view that they should not be included should be "excluded". I do not want to get in trouble. Regards. Redking7 (talk) 19:42, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok, I have moved the discussion from Talk: Commonwealth of Nations to Talk:List of members of the Commonwealth of Nations. As you can imagine, the latter (a spin off page of the former) gets far few visitors, so the extent to which there will be "discussion" will probably fall off accordingly. Pretty silly move really. Either way, I guess the fact that no sources are offered doesn't matter – I shouldn't take this too seriously. Its an amateur organisation. Regards. Redking7 (talk) 20:49, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Amazing Race Wikipedia
Hello, Juliancolton. Welcome to the Amazing Race Wikipedia. In your travels, you will encounter two types of tasks. In a Detour, you have a choice between two tasks. Both of you must work together on this. In a Roadblock, one team member must work on a task alone. Your Amazing Race Wikipedia submissions page is located here. Enjoy the competition! Best, and. 19:44, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Re: KCB (Rapper)
Julian:

How are you? I was hoping you could give me a little info on why this page was deleted. Any info, would be greatly appreciated. I happen to be the rapper that goes by that name. If any info is needed to back up the bio, please check – Us3.com, Bluenoterecords.com, jazzhole.com, Rolling Stone Magazine, & Billboard music charts. If I can be any help, please let me know. Thanks in advance. Have a great week!

KCB 6/16/09 Juliancrack (talk) 20:05, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

1993 Pacific hurricane season
I notice you left the expansion tag on there, but you haven't edited that article in about a week. Do you plan to finish it? If not, I think you should go back to the previous version of the article (the old format) since it's incomplete, and put the current work in a sandbox. Just a thought. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 00:36, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

GOD DAMN COOKIE


Jake Wartenberg has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

02:21, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Ron Hamence in 1948
Renominated him. Thanks  YellowMonkey  ( cricket calendar poll! ) paid editing=POV 03:36, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Relisting at AFD
Hi, Julian; I had nominated an article for deletion (Articles for deletion/Bristol Indymedia (2nd nomination)). I wondered if relisting to generate more discussion was something an editor can do, or whether it's reserved to admins (and if the latter, if they do so as a matter of course, at their discretion, or on request)? - Simon Dodd { U·T·C·WP:LAW } 14:02, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks, done! - Simon Dodd { U·T·C·WP:LAW } 14:23, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

IRC stuff
Since CB is doing something, How do you do that hilarious stuff such as what you did from 11:34-11:35 CDT(I mean the delete and cry stuff) Darren23 (Contribs) 16:54, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * so thats like /D23 ? Darren23 (Contribs) 18:54, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * How do you log in to freenode? It just says do /msg nickserv register   Darren23 (Contribs) 17:08, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Re:RfA
Wow, thanks for considering me! Give me a day or so to think about it. I think I'm definitely interested.  ceran  thor 10:39, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I think I am available tomorrow to start it. Would you like to start a draft today, for readiness's sake?  ceran  thor 21:36, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Email : Replied
to yours. -- ₪ Amused Repose   Converse!  15:50, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Howard 100 and Howard 101
You revert and give me a warning for [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Howard_100_and_Howard_101&diff=next&oldid=297023118 an edit] with which I contract an utterly unnecessary single-sentence-subsection into its parent section? Or did you just not pay attention and automatically assumed I had added the "Fartathon" sentence which [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Howard_100_and_Howard_101&diff=prev&oldid=297023118 is not the case]? 78.34.201.30 (talk) 20:46, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Nevermind, I noticed you're using Huggle. Actually looking at and considering the individual edit before mindlessly reverting and liberally handing out a user warning is obviously too much to ask of the average Huggle user, seeing as this exact thing happens all the time with no immediate corrective in place and any attempt at mutual education being construed as incivility. In that case, have a nice day, Julian. And always keep in mind the invaluable systemic lesson which Huggle implants into all its users: The ability and willingness to read is not a prerequisite to edit Wikipedia. 78.34.201.30 (talk) 20:55, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It was an honest mistake. I'm human as well, you know. ;) – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 21:04, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Question
Hello. I am a fairly new editor and do not know where to go to report 3revert rule violations and obnoxious edits, both of which IP 24.15.125.234 did in multiregional hypothesis. Thanks, Airplaneman (talk) 23:04, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Admin coaching
Hi Julian, I've created my page located here. blurredpeace ☮ 01:09, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

RFA
You gave advice to User:SOPHIAN regarding his RFA, mentioning that he only had 40 edits. It seems that the user is trying to increase his edit count in the most strange way.

Wapondaponda (talk) 05:34, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

RFC/Docu
Hi there. Is "appealing" [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_comment%2FDocu&diff=297106494&oldid=297106392 here] a typo? I haven't seen that word expressed in this RFC. -kotra (talk) 06:27, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

WP:NYSR inactivity check
Hello, Juliancolton. You are receiving this message because you are listed on the participant list of WP:NYSR. I am conducting an inactivity check on behalf of the project to see if the project still has an active editor base. The status column on the participant list will be cleared today, and to remain a listed member of the project, you must update your status on the participant list (preferably using the terms "Active", "Semi-active", or "Inactive") which is located here. Those who do not update their status after one week (by the night of June 25) and those who put inactive as their status will be removed from the list. If you have any questions, please leave a message on my talk page or at the "A smorgasbord of topics" section on WT:NYSR. Thank you for your understanding and your time. –  T M F 12:29, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Urban heat island
Since you're an administrator, I need to know something. Is what William Connelley is doing on the Urban heat island article and talk page permissible via wikipedia standards? His behavior on the global warming and urban heat island appears contradictory to the wikipedia mission and protocol. Thegreatdr (talk) 19:16, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * We might be turning a corner, just so you know. So far, none of my attempts at improving the urban heat island have been reverted.  A good sign.  I'm trying very hard to keep the edits as non-controversial as possible.  Thegreatdr (talk) 17:53, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Help requested
Hi Julian. About two weeks ago, you asked me if I needed help with implementing and updating ArticleHistories of recently passed GAs. I've been keeping on top of that. However, I've encountered another task for which I need help.

In some featured topics, none of the articles in those topics have oldids for when they were promoted to featured topic status (see for example Talk:Timeline of Mary Wollstonecraft). I've been adding these oldids—using Dr pda's articlehistory.js. If you can help out, that would be great. I'm at history right now (the hurricanes took a while). Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 14:55, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Regex lesson
I just got a little regex lesson from the guys over at WP:VPT, and I've copied it to User:The Transhumanist/Regexes.

Enjoy.

 Th e Tr ans hu man ist   19:10, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

User:Poiumnbvlkjhg
Thanks for reverting that bottom-feeder's vandalism to my userspace. He's obviously a sock of, the guy who was banned two weeks ago for making graphic death threats against Obama. I think a checkuser's in order to flush out any more sleepers, don't you think? Blueboy96 21:22, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Outline update – Full Steam Ahead! - 06/18/2009
Several members of the WikiProject have been hard at work.

Buaidh has been building and refining the outlines on the U.S. States, the states' historical outlines, and the Historical outline of the United States. Lately, his edits have dominated the project's watchlist readout. (I think he's overdue for a barnstar or two. hint hint)

Penubag has been working on medals for all the main branches of the OOK, and has completed the OOK WikiProject's animated advert banner (see below).

Highfields has been filling in the currencies for each country on their respective outlines.

NuclearWarfare and Thehelpfulone have been busy with WP:AWB, posting banners and notices, and helping our sister project, the Index WikiProject, get established. Indexes work hand-in-hand with the outlines and are prominently linked to from the top of most of them. And the outlines, which serve as tables of contents, are only as good as the pages they link to.

Since we started integrating (linking) the OOK and its support pages into the encyclopedia and into the Wikipedia community, activity on outlines has been increasing. Though there's still much left to do.

But I digress. There are a couple more...

Welcome our new members! Stefan and MacMed
Stefan is building the Outline of sharks.

MacMed has joined our advanced wiki-tools team, and is currently adding links to outlines in the corresponding subject articles' see also sections.

Be sure to stop by their talk pages and say "hi".

WPOOK's advert banner has gone live!
Penubag has finished this WikiProject's animated advert banner, and it is now being displayed on the Wikipedia ads template which in turn is displayed on about 2000 user pages. Each time someone access one of those pages, there is a 1 in 184 chance of them viewing this:

If you'd like to display the banner on your userpage locked-on to the ad as above, use the following code:

 

(By the way, it's been awhile since we've barnstarred Penubag).

Watchers needed!
If you haven't already, please add the entire project's watchlist to your watchlist. Here's how:


 * From the edit window, copy and paste WikiProject Outline of knowledge/Watchlist into your raw watchlist.


 * Or go to WikiProject Outline of knowledge/Watchlist using Related changes and click on "Related changes" in the toolbox menu in Wikipedia's sidebar on the left hand side of the screen.

Check the watchlist every time you log on!
I forgot to mention this step above. :)

The OOK is in 5 other Wikipedias?
I can't make heads or tails of 'em, but these links were on Portal:Contents/Outline of knowledge:


 * ar:ويكيبيديا:مواضيع أساسية
 * fa:پورتال:فهرست موضوعات پایه
 * pl:Przegląd dziedzin wiedzy
 * pt:Portal:Conteúdo/Esboço do conhecimento
 * zh-yue:基礎課題表清單

Resurrected from the grave yard...
I discovered an AfD discussion on possibly the first article named "Outline of", which was called Outline of Islamic and Muslim related topics, and which was created 4 years ago. Of course they deleted it. But now it has many friends, and so it has risen from the dead. :)

See the DRV discussion at Deletion review/Log/2009 June 7.

A diamond buried in project space

 * When G716 found the page "Learn" tucked away as a subpage of the Probability WikiProject, he thought "This deserves to be in the article space", and moved it to the encyclopedia. See Outline of probability.

Recruiting
Recruiters needed. Drop me a note if you are interested.

Advice from the mentors

 * Astatine-210, Strdst grl, and Willscrlt – link to the outlines from the corresponding subject articles' see also sections – this is underway by MacMed (non-country outlines) and User talk:NuclearWarfare (counry outlines).
 * Astatine-210 – add a link to the outlines to the disambiguation pages of the corresponding subjects – good idea. Since "Outline" is just the type of page, not the subject, I think these might qualify for inclusion on disambiguation pages. We need someone to look into the relevant guidelines on this.
 * SimonTrew – provide a badge (userbox) for WPOOK members to add to their user pages – Penubag will have one for us soon.
 * Zachary crimsonwolf – create a card explaining outlines, and send it to everyone you know, and make it viral (by including a request for the recipients to send the card to everyone they know) – this task has been split in three:
 * Creation of a "thank you for your interest" card which introduces (explains) outlines, to send to queriers, new participants to discussions, those who seem to be confused about outlines, etc.
 * Creation of a thank you card / invitation to the WPOOK, to send to users we see working on outlines, including a request for them to invite others whom they think might be interested


 * weebiloobil – contact Wikignomes – OK...
 * 3. Creation of an invitation to Wikignomes, with a brief rundown on the types of tasks there are for them to do on the outlines. The invitation will include a request for them to invite anyone they think would enjoy working on outlines.


 * weebiloobil – add examples to Outlines – more examples will be added as suitable outlines are completed
 * weebiloobil – add a picture to Outlines (it doesn't have to be relevant), to provide atmosphere and to break it up visually and add a splash of color – will do, and we'll add a caption to make it relevant, with a link to the outline on that subject. Thank you for the idea.
 * Zachary crimsonwolf – ask Jimbo Wales to bestow the award(s) for the country outlines contest, once you get it going first – we'll give that a try
 * Zachary crimsonwolf – ask everyone in the project to inform their acquaintances around Wikipedia about the OOK – will do, as soon as the cards
 * UzEE – collaborate with all the WikiProjects you share scope with – we've placed a banner on their talk pages, and have placed task notices on some. We'll be posting more tasks, and plan to create a section on contents system development and maintenance for each WikiProject page itself.
 * SriMesh – if you can't get outlines added to next year's WikiCup, then create your own WikiCup-like contest – there's 6 months left to this year to address reservations and work out the details at WikiCup. In the meantime, there's the 200-WikiProject contest, which needs input.

More outline tasks

 * WikiProject Outline of knowledge/Drafts/Outline of chocolate draft – our current outline collaboration!
 * Outline of psychology – someone moved a big chunk of this article to the talk page, leaving a big gap in the outline. Editors are needed to add subheadings and links.
 * See also links – add (where "x" is the subject) to the see also section of the corresponding subject article of each outline

New outlines in article space

 * Outline of sharks – under construction in article space
 * Outline of Hinduism (converted from "List of Hinduism-related topics")

New outline drafts

 * Outline of chocolate
 * Outline of Christianity

Main discussion pages

 * Wikipedia talk:Outlines
 * Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Outline of knowledge
 * Portal talk:Contents/Outline of knowledge

Keep up the great work
I'm impressed with the level of enthusiasm and work going into the outlines. I'm proud to be working with each of you.

 Th e Tr ans hu man ist   21:44, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Chris O'Brien
I noticed you just deleted Chris O'Brien, I was wondering if it was ok to create purely as a disambig page as there are other Chris O'Brien articles in WP? I.e. restore the page with no history. LibStar (talk) 00:13, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

 * Sure ... coax me into doing something stupid huh? ... lol. I mentioned to Law about blocking some guy named "Jimbo", and he tells me to go for it! .. geesh ... no mercy for the newly anointed huh?  Seriously though Julian, thank you, thank you for everything.  You've shown me by example that it can be good to speak up – and I appreciate that. — Ched :  ?  04:35, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

An Old AfD
Back in March, you were the closing admin on this AfD discussion: Articles for deletion/Chris Parmelee. 4 days later, user: Johnny Spasm removed the redirect. He is very active in contesting any AfD for Ft. Myers Miracle players, so I thought it might be better if an admin addressed this with him. Niteshift36 (talk) 11:31, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

This AfD was delete : Articles for deletion/Ben Revere, but the article is back.
 * He has done the same with this one: Articles for deletion/Steve Singleton.

Retiring
Hi, just letting you know that I am retiring for the summer, if you have any comments, please reply soon. Thanks, Frozen4322 : Chat  12:34, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Another HV selected pic?
See this. Daniel Case (talk) 03:56, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Oh, and I've long been meaning to bring this one to your attention as well (It's a personal favorite of mine). Daniel Case (talk) 22:16, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Sorry about that typo, and thanks for the recognition. I've put the Stone Jug pic up for QI at Commons ... I haven't done that for a long time. We'll see what (ahem) develops. I should probably put that one up there too. Daniel Case (talk) 18:05, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

My user and talk page
Hi there. You protected my user and talk page at my request, and I was wondering if you could unprotect them. Could you also delete my user page because I want to delete the history. Thanks. The Prince (talk) 14:43, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Question about Rollback
Hi, thanks for allowing me to use the rollback feature – I'm still trying to understand how it works and just had a question if you can answer... if you rollback on someone's edit to an article, it rolls back all the way to the first edit they ever did on the that article, or will it only rollback to their last consecutive edit? I sometimes find a page where a vandal blanked a section of an article, and might have done it multiple times in a row deleting parts of the article at random, and someone else comes in to fix the article, but only did so by fixing the last immediate edit the vandal performed, so there are still parts missing. Also lets say the vandal hit the article again after that. If I rollback on the vandal's latest edit, will that also revert all their previous edits, even rolling back on others attempted fixes? Cyberia23 (talk) 17:42, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
 Aditya  α ß 18:12, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

About Oguzhan Özyakup
Hi, you closed the debate AFD about the page :Oguzhan Özyakup before any consensus is reached (1-3). The major concern was Notability...Preventively, please provide me a copy of this deleted page. I've got for the purpose three reliable references that would clear the problem. Thanks Rirunmot (talk) 23:54, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Here We Go Again (Demi Lovato Song)
Hey. You closed this AfD a few hours ago. About a hour later, I came across this, which I then moved to the now deleted page. Whether you want to speedy it as G4 (recreated deleted material) or not? -- Sk8er5000 (talk) 02:10, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Abandoned footwear
Regarding [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Abandoned_footwear&curid=23208905&diff=297458335&oldid=297365563 your decision]: "Closing debate, result was no consensus", what does it mean? Thanks in advance. Please reply here. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 06:19, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * There were/are 9 "keep", 5 "delete" and 1 "redirect". No, there was no unanimous point-of-view, but my understanding is that one does not need unanimous support to reach consensus. So that begs the question, what criteria does one use to decide if consensus has been achieved?
 * Now that you have closed it, what happens next?


 * Thanks for the quick reply. I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3APdfpdf&diff=297503174&oldid=297502554 responded here]. Pdfpdf (talk) 06:30, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

/RFA
How do my answers look so far? I've put off Q2 for later, because I have to eat breakfast (the food has been sitting for around 15 minutes!), so I'll probably answer it around 1:00. I've got a swim meet today, apologies.  ceran  thor 11:36, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I have now finished Q2, do you think I need another nominator? I am ready to go live whenever you are. Just send me a ping and Ill get going.  ceran  thor 12:16, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Possible commons adminship
Julian,

Thanks for suggesting it. I'm touched.

I do have a lot of responsibilities, between creating new NRHP articles, the things I do offline (more this summer than usual), adminship here and oversight. But there are some reasons to consider it all the same (I had been considering asking for trusted user status for a while anyway, to review Flickr submissions if nothing else). I guess I am involved enough in the Commons community, and there's been a fair amount of discussion lately on some of the mailing lists about other people's issues with the Commons community, which led in turn to suggestions that people who have problems should get themselves more involved. Maybe this is a sign. Daniel Case (talk) 14:22, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Exactly right. It's sometimes difficult to find a helpful and friendly admin over there. It's good when you know someone, but not everyone has an in. If you perform over there like you do here, it would most likely lead to a at least a little bit less frustration and maybe a few more noobs staying and becoming productive members of that community.  wadester 16  17:51, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

NPW requests for permission archive
Hi Julian. See comments at Wikipedia talk:RFPERM. I reordered the page (putting all the requests in the right order as some seem to get put at the top), and archived April and May. If you could take a look over what I've done and check it's right that would be appreciated. Cheers – Kingpin13 (talk) 17:13, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem – Kingpin13 (talk) 17:21, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Apology on Equality Mississippi
Just a couple moments ago, my block expired and with my first edit I apologized for my behavior and comments that got me blocked. I stated there and will here again, that I will be taking myself out of the discussion, as I am letting my emotions get the best of me and causing more trouble than good. Take Care... NeutralHomer •  Talk  • 17:16, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Clever girl
http://enwp.org/wiki/w/index.php?&oldid=297191997 <-- that's a nifty trick. – xeno talk  17:41, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Not owned by the foundation though, could be susceptible to linkrot... – xeno talk  17:42, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * heh, I later found out that it can be further abbreviated to http://enwp.org/?&oldid=297191997 :) – but yeah, it is a peculiar redirect... – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 17:43, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Your assistance please...
I went to add some material to Abdul Basit (terrorist suspect) tonight, and found it had been deleted.

You closed Articles for deletion/Abdul Basit (terrorist suspect). Could you please userify the article, its revision history and talk page to User:Geo Swan/review/Abdul Basit (terrorist suspect)?

FWIW the nominator failed to honor the recommendation of the deletion policies and advise the article creator. FWIW I regret that none of the more experienced participants in the discussion thought to do so, and that no one added the deletion sorting stub for terrorism to the afd page.

Thanks! Geo Swan (talk) 00:25, 21 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for this [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGeo_Swan&diff=297641905&oldid=297395632]! Cheers  Geo Swan (talk) 00:58, 21 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I've made some changes to the article. Thanks.  I am going to ask a few people for their opinion as to whether the article merits restoration to article space.  Cheers!  Geo Swan (talk) 14:23, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Bristol Badgers
Hi, I have no problem with the deletion. I think it might be more appropriate to merge with Culture of Bristol. I have been considering splitting off the sport section anyway. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:25, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I have taken a copy and parked it in my sandbox. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:03, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Good article reassessment/50 Cent/1
Sorry to be a pain but I've nominated 50 Cent for a GAR and I've somehow managed to stuff things up. I noticed it when I went to template an editors talk page with this;

50 Cent has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here.

As you can see, this is nearly what I wanted, but there is a red link for "Reviewers concerns are here" which I don't think is supposed to happen. Also, isn't the review supposed to automatically come up on Good article reassessment? Because it hasn't. I've obviously stuffed something up, but not sure what, any help would be great appreciated. Thanks,  Aaroncrick (Tassie Boy talk) 01:41, 21 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks anyway :) It still doesn't link to the reviewers concerns, well I don't think it does.  Aaroncrick (Tassie Boy talk) 02:25, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Pinafore
Thanks for your input at the Pinafore FAC. All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 05:21, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Wind: Checking prose length on an article
I've added about 20% more content to wind due to FAC suggestions, and am trying to stay under the word cap. So far, I have only one support, but no opposes, which is a good thing. How do I check that out, short of counting the words manually? Thegreatdr (talk) 19:42, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Very nice. That did the trick for wind.  Why is it that the TC article count seems way low?  It looks like it's only highlighting 1/4 of the available prose.  Thegreatdr (talk) 19:54, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Maybe there is something wrong in the code of the page, as you said. Global warming has a smaller version of the same word count problem, though it doesn't have a table.  Thegreatdr (talk) 19:58, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * That could be. Thanks for your help.  Thegreatdr (talk) 20:06, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the support vote. This whole cite web, cite book, cite journal thing has been quite confusing, but I think I finally got it.  Thegreatdr (talk) 20:43, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It's been difficult this time, because I'm used to the TC project providing more input during FACs, such as occurred with the tropical cyclone and List of wettest tropical cyclones in the United States. Extratropical cyclone had fewer issues, but I believe the standards were lower for FAC three years ago.  Thegreatdr (talk) 20:55, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Also, in a bit of ridiculous related news, due to the recent expansion of wind while in FAC, it satisfied the 5x expansion portion of the DYK rules so I briefly submitted it. The problem was, the 5x expansion has to occur within 5 days. It took this one 93! Thegreatdr (talk) 22:19, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Tomorrow
I have school tomorrow, and I'm extremely busy, which makes me wary about starting then. Tuesday it is, I guess.  ceran  thor 01:29, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Alright, sounds good. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 01:32, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Hey
I'll be back on editing in the next week or so. I'm in the middle of a cross country move and am a little busy. We can continue the coaching then. cheers, Otis  Jimmy  One  14:10, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of Saudi Aramco Beach
Geozeyad (talk) 14:45, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Hello Juliancolton

May be I am still newbie here but I do not think the deletion of the above page is justified. the beach is very well known and owned by famous international oil company with multinational employees!

Just for a comparison and in the same area there is this page which is only a new land to be a residential district in the future:

King Fahad Suburb

but the Saudi Aramco beach is more than 50 years with a fence and 24 hour security patrol.! many retried workers from USA, UK, Canada, Philippines and Egypt will be interested about the article since they have a years of memories in this beach others also will benefit from the information provided!! http://colorabian.wordpress.com/2008/10/18/half-moon-bay-aramco-beach-on-the-persian-gulf/

I hope for a consideration of the deletion decision, many thanks

Greetings Geozeyad (talk) 14:45, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Autoreviewer
Should we give the right to anyone on this list? I've already given it to one user who I know often creates articles. Thanks. Acalamari 16:49, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll start from the back then. Where's the "restricted" list? Acalamari 16:51, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The lists are the same...? I'm confused. Acalamari 16:57, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay then, thanks! Just giving you guys a hand now. :) Acalamari 17:01, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

What is Autoreviewer?
Hi, I noticed that you added something about Autoreviewer to the talk page of my friend User:Ambrosius007 who has unfortunately been absent from Wikipedia for many months now. What is Autoreviewer and what prompted this? Is he back? I have seen no edits? Clarification will be appreciated. Cheers. History2007 (talk) 16:55, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm adding the flag to every user on this list. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 16:56, 22 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Fine. By the way, how did that list come about and what does Autoreviewer right give a user? Is it a list of nice people with over 50-75 new articles? If so, why am I not on it? I have created more than that. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 17:13, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Hello again. I have the same question. What is it, and should I want to be on it? I don't usually do patrolling, I write and edit articles manually and don't usually do random patrolling (although I fix vandalism, etc when I see it). -- Confusedly, Ssilvers (talk) 17:13, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I think it's so that other users don't have to patrol your new articles. – xeno talk  17:14, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Ah. Well, if you think it's appropriate, Juliancolton, feel free to add me. I do create quite a few new articles (I think I've started something like 300 new articles, nearly all of which are beyond the stub stage). -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:17, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

I've been added. Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:12, 22 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Sorry to jump in but I too had to ask what it is as I've been seeing it everywhere. If it's about new articles, well... :) -- can  dle • wicke  18:13, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Just see Autoreviewer, which explains it quite well. :) – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 18:16, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Huh??
Why are so many people promoting so many people to autoreviewer. And what is that? Abce2 | Free Lemonade  Only 25 cents  17:11, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Most users at this list are receiving the flag. See 19309. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 17:13, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Application enclosed
Hi, I figured out what autoreviewer is. Please consider this my formal application to receive this stauts based on my complete edit/create history:. Of these over 200 new pages are non-redirects. . A structured list of articles I have started (most of them substantial) can also be seen here: User:History2007/pages. Thank you. History2007 (talk) 17:40, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * You could probably go ahead and request the flag at Wikipedia talk:Autoreviewer. Cheers, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 17:46, 22 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Thank you. I did so. Cheers. History2007 (talk) 17:51, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thank you for the promotion!--Mr Fink (talk) 18:01, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Heh, it's not quite a "promotion", but you're welcome nonetheless. ;) – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 18:04, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
<--This is made by me without logging in. Honestly! -- Tyw7 ‍ ‍‍ (Talk  ●  Contributions) Leading Innovations >>>  21:50, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter XXI
Delivered by The  Helpful  Bot  at 22:30, 22 June 2009 (UTC) for the WikiCup. To report errors, please leave a message on the talk page.

deletion for unpublished research
Hi, I'm wondering why you unilaterally deleted Beckstroms Law. He is well qualified and I have never heard of a Wikipedia rule to only include research independently published. Please teach me something? thanks Alan Alanlevin (talk) 23:44, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Sorry I forgot to include the link http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Beckstrom%27s_law&action=edit&redlink=1 Alanlevin (talk) 23:53, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't mean to be contentious but I would like to see the article, so I suppose that I am contesting the deletion. Please restore with PROD. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alanlevin (talk • contribs) 00:25, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

still learning, thanks for the reminder to sign Alanlevin (talk) 01:39, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Outline collaboration #2: Outline of Gibraltar
This outline is approaching completion.

I added a bunch more links, finding them with the following Google site-specific searches of Wikipedia:
 * "of" and "Gibraltar"


 * "in" and "Gibraltar"


 * "for" and "Gibraltar"


 * with "Gibraltar" not at the end

(You can use the wikicode for the links above as the basis for new searches – just replace "Gibraltar" with any other country or region name).

Request: please redirect the redlinks! (bluelinking...)
The redlinks need to be bluelinked where possible. The most useful way is to create redirects leading to the material (which is usually included in a section of an article – see Redirect. That way, when the redirect pages are replaced by the actual articles, the links will already point to the right places.

Please take a crack at it, and bluelink a few.

Thank you.

Good luck.

Have fun.

 Th e Tr ans hu man ist   00:39, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia Signpost : 22 June 2009 ==


 * Special report:Study of vandalism survival times
 * News and notes: Wikizine, video editing, milestones
 * Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia impacts town's reputation, assorted blogging
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:56, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

inre Articles for deletion/Yair Qedar
In addressing your concerns over the state of the article, I have performed cleanup and sourcing. Currently, the only comments at the AfD are one editor's succinct "per nom" and my own keep. I ask you to look at the article now and advise if I have met its current issues. Thanks,  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:49, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the quick response. I'll be ading more sourcing to the article. Hoping for some input from Israeli-reading Wikipedians. Thank you.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:54, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Can you help me out with the SWAT article?
Hi, I was wondering if you could help me with something on the SWAT article. Recently Benny 919 made a large edit to SWAT which was most certainly a good faith edit, but in it he deleted a huge number of references (over 3,000 characters) with no stated reason for why and without making any claim that the refs were invalid (and previous talk page discussions have reached the consensus that the refs are valid). There have been two edits made to the page since then, so I can't undo his edit, and I don't really want to manually re-add the refs. I would like the page to be reverted to the edit by 66.57.22.222 on June 21, but I don't have rollback rights so I was wondering if you could help. If I'm not handling this properly or you have any concerns, please call me out. If you can revert the page though, I'd appreciate it. Thanks,  Neil   Clancy  15:56, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Alright that works. We'll see what his reasons were. Thanks for the help.  Neil   Clancy  16:36, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

I'm Sorry
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

Darren23 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Darren23 (Contribs) 17:00, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Marion Historic District (Cheshire and Southington, Connecticut) & WP:3RR
After reading up on it closer, you're right. [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ANyttend&diff=298158928&oldid=298137569 Done] and [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=Cobaltbluetony&page=User%3ANyttend&year=&month=-1&tagfilter= done]. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:10, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank You!
I am glad to be back, although I will only be making a gradual return. It helps when you're not struggling with something and trying to hide it. Southern Illinois SKYWARN (talk) 17:19, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Do you have a bot account yet?
Hi Julian,

I don't remember, did you ever get approved for a bot?

My mailing list has grown to about 50 people, and it's getting cumbersome for me to send the Outline Updates. And the list will keep getting bigger and bigger.

Also, I need to contact the 60 members of the Countries WikiProject again. The last time I did it by hand using Linky.

And it's time to invite the Wikignomes, Wikielves, and Wikifairies to our party. Yes, all 2500+ of them! :)

There are more notices to go out to the 200 or so country wikiprojects.

And for the drafts, we need to post banners and notices to the corresponding subject article talk pages and corresponding Wikiproject talk pages.

And that's just for starters.

Thehelpfulone hasn't been around much, and NuclearWarfare is overloaded. :)

We can't let things slow down.

On the contrary, we've got to speed them up even more!!!

I look forward to your reply.

 Th e Tr ans hu man ist   17:26, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

P.S.: If anybody else is reading this and has a bot account, please contact me ASAP. WP:WPOOK needs all the help we can get.

Bot account
eh, that kinda fell apart, primarily due to my cluelessness around technical stuff. I could use AWB to deliver the newsletters though. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 18:33, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * AWB is a bot. It just needs to be activated.  And for that you need bot approval.  It's easy!  See:


 * Bots/Requests for approval/Thehelpfulbot
 * Bots/Requests for approval/Thehelpfulbot 2
 * Bots/Requests for approval/Thehelpfulbot 3
 * Bots/Requests for approval/Thehelpfulbot 4
 * Bots/Requests for approval/Thehelpfulbot 5
 * Bots/Requests for approval/Thehelpfulbot 6
 * Bots/Requests for approval/Thehelpfulbot 7
 * Bots/Requests for approval/Thehelpfulbot 8
 * Bots/Requests for approval/Thehelpfulbot 9


 * For your first request, make it for newsletter delivery, for the WP:WPOOK and for others upon request. That should go through without a hitch.  There's a place on the standard form to indicate that you'll be using AWB.


 * (Once you have your initial approval, it is even easier to get new tasks approved for it.  But we'll deal with that later).


 * Send me links as you go through the process, so that I can comment if needed.


 * Good luck. :)


 * Have fun.


 *  Th e Tr ans hu man ist   18:54, 23 June 2009 (UTC)


 * P.S.: while waiting for bot approval, you can still use AWB manually. But you'll enjoy it much more if AWB is working in the background automatically while you are doing your thing on another window!  They don't call it multi-tasking for nothing.  :)

Thomas Ricciardi
Greetings, I'm not familiar with the inner workings of Wikipedia regarding how information is edited and maintained on the site. But I did notice that you have removed the information about Thomas Ricciardi that apparently was once posted to Wikipedia. I also see that it was removed because of content violations of some type. Was there any actual information in the posting that was useful? I'm looking for any factual information I can find about this person for research on a project I'm doing for fun (I am trying to learn about the "who's who" of La Cosa Nostra in America – a bit of a hobby you might say). Any information about this person you might be able to provide would be greatly appreciated.

69.3.56.227 (talk) 17:26, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Joseph Priestley lead image alignment
You previously have commented on the RfC at Talk:Joseph Priestley on whether or not the lead image should be left-aligned. A straw poll is under way to determine what, if any consensus have been developed towards resolving the debate. Go to Talk:Joseph Priestley and indicate your relative levels of support for each option. Thank you. Madcoverboy (talk) 17:56, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

I finally got to whack somebody with a trout!
That was fun. :)

 Th e Tr ans hu man ist   23:28, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Finland–Slovenia relations
Hi. You recently closed the Afd discussion for this article. I'd like to continue to improve the article to see if I can get it to the point where it will be kept. Would it be possible for you to restore the last version at User:Cdogsimmons/Finland–Slovenia relations? Thanks.--Cdogsimmons (talk) 01:36, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks again.--Cdogsimmons (talk) 01:41, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

My bot
Could you comment on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Bots/Requests_for_approval/JCbot_2&diff=298242862&oldid=298181046 this]? – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 01:26, 24 June 2009 (UTC)


 * ✅  Th e Tr ans hu man ist   02:00, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

AFD close, should it be salted?
You [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Trail_Blazers_Street_Jam&curid=23234732&diff=298025924&oldid=298010354 closed the AFD] on Trail Blazers Street Jam. How many times has it been deleted previously? If the number is more than 2, would you mind salting it? tedder (talk) 00:33, 23 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Prying this open again- just FWIW, I thought it had been deleted more. That's because it has been created as Trail blazers street jam. A new one was pasted in there today. Note it's the same user who created the capped version above, which had to go through an AFD first. (I'll watch your userpage, you can reply here) tedder (talk) 16:35, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Robert Reed Church
You seem to have made a mistake in deleting this article, and I think restoring it would be a good idea. About a week ago, when I stumbled on the article (or what little was left of it, the pink log entry), the Google cache was still visible, showing a reference to an entry in the American National Biography. This was one of two articles started by the same user and nominated for deletion by User:Tedder, see User talk:Tibalandre. The other article appears never to have been deleted. The user starting these pages has not made any contributions since the deletion. I don't care much for short articles with little to no content when created by people who ought to know better, but I think one should be more lenient with very new users. And from what I could tell from the Google cache (not sure if it reflected the very last version of the page), the deletion reason was downright wrong. I have no access to the ANB, but it is published by the Oxford University Press, and appears to be the American equivalent of the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography and similar European biographical reference works. Surely an entry there is a "reliable sources to indicate notability of an individual"?

Getting back to this again today, I found a newer article on the same topic, Robert R. Church, Sr., but it turns out to be plagiarised from one of the linked sources. That, on the other hand, needs to be resolutely deleted and the user warned that plagiarism will lead to eternal damnation in hell, hairy palms or some other unpleasantness. --Hegvald (talk) 17:35, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for keeping an eye on the troublemakers on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Islam:_What_the_West_Needs_to_Know&action=history Islamic movie].

Warm regards,  Jaakobou Chalk Talk  17:50, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi Julian – can you please help me understand what we can do to UNdelete the wiki page i nominated for Emily Terrazas aka Amalia Terrazas? I am new at this and would very much appreciate any help, as I feel this person is noteworthy. thank you. 76.171.169.146 (talk) 18:36, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

FLC move
Featured list candidates/List of Vice Presidents of the United States → Featured list candidates/List of Vice Presidents of the United States/archive1 (delete the former). Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 20:55, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autoreviewer
I have repplied you: User talk:Oashi Franta Oashi (talk) 21:11, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Rollback permissions
That was fast; thanks so much. - PKM (talk) 03:25, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

AWB?
Hi Julian, I don't really know the ways of AWB, but is there any way for you to do a run on a group of articles to fix dashes? See this. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 03:58, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks a million. Dabomb87 (talk) 13:34, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Hate to bother you further, but have you finished the copyedit for Featured list candidates/List of highways in Essex County, New York/archive1? It's the only thing holding up my support. Dabomb87 (talk) 14:05, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Kingdom of León in leonese language
Sorry for my English.

In the article Leonese language.It is doing what I think it's a sabotage. In the current administrative division of Spain is not the Kingdom of Leon, not as a province or autonomous region or any other administrative division. The Act is set as a reference, in 1830, was repealed many years ago (the current administrative division was 1983 in 1976 following the arrival of democracy to Spain).

In the Spanish wiki nuna this user who want to put this information here has done there, because he knows that is false. Are taking advantage of the ignorance of the English language that many Spanish users could report in a neutral manner and are attempting to enter false data.

In the Spanish wiki you can check or that such data have not been introduced or have been removed.

We step by step, we start with this.

Greetings.--FCPB (talk) 09:33, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Article: Todd Friel
I am wondering where the article on Todd Friel, presenter of wretched radio, has gone. I am very interested in this evangelical preacher, and his early life, and was surprised to find his page recently deleted by you... I am just curious, if you could get back to me it would be great! Stakingsin (talk) 18:13, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

JCbot task – post newsletter
To the user talk pages listed at User:The Transhumanist/OOK list

Append this:

 

Thank you.

Good luck.

Have fun.

 Th e Tr ans hu man ist   20:37, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Outline update – Push push push – 06/25/2009
Work is proceeding apace...


 * Julian is working on getting a bot account (and he delivered this update as his trial run).
 * Penubag is working on the Project page and upcoming contest.
 * Buaidh is developing all of the U.S. state historical outlines.
 * Tarheel95 is writing a proposal to add a link to the Main Page leading to the the OOK.
 * Highfields is integrating the OOK into the encyclopedia by deorphanizing outlines by placing a main link in the see also section of the subject articles that have a corresponding outline.
 * I've been trying to keep up with them. :)


 * New members


 * Minnecologies – developing Outline of forestry and is watching the big picture.
 * Mnation2 – improving Outline of Lebanon


 * Hatnotes

The current consensus is that we can't place a hatnote leading to an outline at the top of a subject articles unless the outline being presented is of at least the same quality-level as the article.


 * What's next...

Improve outline quality by completing them.

Place hatnotes for the outlines of high enough quality.

Guidelines pertaining to outlines need to be updated. Outlines emerged as a class of pages only a few months ago, and most of the relevant guidelines don't cover them specifically. For example, Stand-alone lists is incredibly out of date.

Invite wikignomes, wikielves, and wikifairies (all 2500+ of them) to help on the outlines.

Identify 600 more subjects with coverage extensive enough to justify outlines, create rudimentary drafts for them, and post notices to the corresponding WikiProjects and subject talk pages to help build them.

Convert outlines titled "List of" to outline articles, and add them to the OOK. There are a few hundred of these. Conversion instructions are needed.

Add a description of outlines to About Wikipedia and Basic navigation, and add tips about outlines to the WP:TOTD and Tips library.


 * Keep up the great work!

 Th e Tr ans hu man ist   20:27, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

coming soon...
In the next few days, I'll have a newsletter to send to the members of the Countries Wikiproject.

 Th e Tr ans hu man ist   21:03, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

ping
I apologize that we didn't get to start the RFA yesterday... my internet connection is lost, right now I'm using the family laptop (not permitted!). This weekend, as I've just been told, my sibling has a commitment, and unfortunately, we have to stay in a hotel for it. Do you think we should push back the RFA start date until maybe next week? I'll be available today, tomorrow, and early Friday. Tell me what works, I'm mostly flexible.  ceran  thor 16:34, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Update... turns out that it is in two weekends. My internet is back online, so today would be perfect for me, if that works for you, too.  ceran  thor 19:02, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Steve Holter
An article that you have been involved in editing, Steve Holter, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:37, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Wirtland
Just curious, instead of no consensus, why not relist? Aside from the meatpuppets, there were only three editors participating in the debate. Nyttend (talk) 00:59, 27 June 2009 (UTC)


 * (Since the discussion was spammed on external sites, SPA/sockpuppet !voting would have likely continued even after the relist. As such, I think it's better to wait a few weeks and re-nominate it then. –Juliancolton) I see that even after approval some strong wording is still being used here, such as spam and meatpuppets, which is not only groundless but actually sounds insulting. Also, the author of article about historic house "Wirtland" used his Wikipedia adminisrator's rights to move the micronation entry to "Wirtland (micronation)", and to name his article as "Wirtland". In result of this operation, the search for "Wirtland" in Wikipedia now leads to the house, not to the micronation as before, and the same happens in the Google search, creating confusion. The administrator explained his action as follows: "...moving to make way for clearly notable topic", which appears as a case of subjective judgement of prioritization, when a single administrator decided which entry is more notable, according to his/her personal tastes. However, it is not our wish to waste your or our time on complaints, even if justified ones.
 * Wirtland stated that "As an internet-based community, Wirtland attaches high importance to being properly represented in the internet encyclopedia". Bearing in mind Jimbo Wales' principle "Newcomers are always to be welcomed", we were excited about publishing our article in Wikipedia. However, so far we have faced a lot of resistance, and very little welcome.
 * If there is anything about our article which is unacceptable for Wikipedia, please tell us exactly what. So far we have seen only subjective attacks, which were not founded on any clear and open rules. We have seen that some articles are considered notable, and some not notable, without any explanation. A 19-century house in rural USA is more notable? Ok, maybe, just tell us why. You want to renominate our article? Fine, just tell on which ground (or does Wikipedia arbitrarily renominate any entry?), when, and for how long. While Atlantium article is fine with Wikipedia, Wirtland seems to be permanently under attack...
 * I am sorry for being a bit over-emotional, but I hope our disappointment is understandable. We came to Wikipedia with friendly and open mind, and were ready to cooperate, but we won't insist. To be short: We will remove our entry if it contradicts Wikipedia's rules. We will appreciate to see a clear, official, conclusive, final answer. Of course we reserve our right to discuss such an official answer in a public forum. Thanks. Witizen (talk) 18:49, 27 June 2009 (UTC)Witizen.


 * (Sorry? I have no opinion on the contest itself, so to be honest I'm not quite sure why you're trying to convince me. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:31, 28 June 2009 (UTC)) I have written to you for two reasons: 1) You are the person who approved our entry (lifted the nonination for deletion). So, apparently, you're one of decision-makers; 2) You have suggested to "wait a few weeks and re-nominate our entry". If I am wrong in contacting you I apologize. In that case I'd appreciate if you advise who is the right person to address my message to. Thanks. Witizen (talk) 15:05, 28 June 2009 (UTC)Witizen.

John Wark
Hi Julian. You may be terribly busy, in which case feel free to disregard this, but you made some initial comments at the John Wark FAC, I was wondering if we'd dealt with them and/or if you had any others comments or suggestions? The nomination has become a little stale so I'd just appreciate some reviewers returning for a second look. Cheers! The Rambling Man (talk) 14:41, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Walter Mendenhall
I really don't think this one should have been closed no consensus. If anything, it would have been better to relist. But the sources listed in the AFD, which by the way were not put into the article, are trivial mentions. The one that looked like it might feature the subject (example 2) is not accessible. Would you consider reopening this AFD to allow for further participation? لenna vecia  16:40, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Your block of User:Readin
Was wrong. Readin is an established editor with several years of history discussing subjects. The other part of that revert war was a non-discussing pseudo-bot making POV terminology changes against agreed naming conventions touching hundreds of articles in a day. When established editors get blocked for trying to maintain agreed naming conventions, is it any wonder when they leave? SchmuckyTheCat (talk)
 * Please see WP:EQUALITY. Regardless of their tenure, they still violated the 3RR. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 17:43, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * They are free to seek assistance from other editors at various venues when another editor is causing a problem, so there's no need for them to feel discouraged or to have to revert war. It can be frustrating here at times, but there are usually lots of people willing to help. Sometimes you just have to ask for it. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:05, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Hello
I just wanted to let you know that I am back. Sorry, I been away, I was having problems with a user(s) on here. Well, Have a great day..--  Michael  (Talk) 18:07, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Admin Coaching
Hey, I noticed that you have an empty slot for admin coaching, on the coach status page. Would you be willing to take me? Thanks, Finger  z  04:34, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure, that'd work fine for me. I'm currently adopted by Wadester16, and he suggested that I find an admin coach, because I'm interested in picking up the mop, somewhere down the road. I've seen you around, and you seem like a very competent admin, so I really look forward to working with you. Finger z  06:36, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

godsgreatestgift
Not unconstructive – this is a sockpuppet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Editor437 (talk • contribs) 23:19, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

BITE
All I was doing was pointing out this edit: [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AEditor437&diff=298980905&oldid=296601776]  why must you violate WP:BITE?Editor437 (talk) 05:21, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for this signed post with reference to what you're talking about. Newportm (talk) 05:27, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

H.M.S. Pinafore
It's been promoted. Thanks for your help and encouragement! Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:35, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

2012 Fascism
My name is Raymond Mardyks and I have valuable contributions regarding this topic. The "galactic alignment" was originally my research, for example, and now presented in a sloppy second generation, simplistic misleading version. I understand the Maya calendar and it's implications for 2012. How can we proceed? Wiki does not come close to presenting the facts yet. earthlove2013@gmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.123.21.136 (talk) 20:42, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter XXII
Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 21:48, 28 June 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.

Articles for deletion/Ducktown, Atlantic City
Could you explain your closing statement here? I don't see what was weak about my argument. --Chiliad22 (talk) 03:19, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the clarification... although I think at least one of the other keep voters (Shirulashem) was making some sort of a sarcastic comment on AFD, for the record. --Chiliad22 (talk) 03:29, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

RE
I know, I know....I was just sort of talking. I don't consider wikipedia a social networking site but I've actually seen users put posts on their page of why they deserve certain barnstars and they actually get it like hereUser:Spongefrog/Subpage/My Barnstars. Why am I being rebuked ....I am fully aware of the policy and work hard to contribute information and battle the vandals with almost a 1000 reverts now. Altough getting a barnstar wouldn't be that bad of an idea;) Schnitzel MannGreek . 12:36, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I've seen that too. Spongefrog is a rather extreme example though.  --  <B>Soap</B> Talk/Contributions 12:40, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Late to the party.
Aw, man. I wanted to add a note to Articles for deletion/Earth governments (Star Trek), asking the closer to comment on the insults made against the article. Now, everyone who's worked on the article won't get a good impression of WP's processes – and they'll get an accurate one.

Oh well. You snooze, you lose. --Kiz o r  14:46, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Eh? I'm afraid I don't follow. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 15:39, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm unclear far too often. Let's try again. IMAO: there was some subpar behavior in that AfD. "Cruft" may or may not be intended to be degoratory, but its users know that it'll be taken that way, and we had one count of "non-notable plotcrap." In this kind of cases, closing with a note that such editors are getting their way despite and not because of these remarks could improve the atmosphere in the future. Implicitly accepting their behavior makes them feel vindicated and is humiliating to the editors who worked on the article.

This is all academic. I don't blame you, and being too careful to avoid giving that impression made my previous message incoherent. --Kiz o r  09:16, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Your bot request
Hi Juliancolton I wanted to let you know that Bots/Requests for approval/JCbot 2 has been approved. Please visit the above link for more information. Thanks! BAGBot (talk) 18:15, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

JCbot task #2 – post notice
To the user talk pages listed at User:The Transhumanist/OOK list

Append this:

 

Thank you.

Good luck.

Have fun.

 Th e Tr ans hu man ist   19:42, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

that
"Sarcasm" has such a bad reputation. Can we settle for "compassionately exhasperated"? It's an RfA just this side of SNOW, I'm not quite sure I understand the (to use a typically-pejorative phrase in a descriptive manner) policy-wonkery behind your (boilerplate?) RfA comment. Badger Drink (talk) 20:03, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Precisely. The result of the RfA is more than clear, and to simply pile-on with another oppose is both disrespectful to the candidate and of little value to the discussion, in my opinion, unless the voter has additional input. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 20:06, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Request for feedback
Minnecologies has done an incredible amount of work on Outline of forestry and posted a note to me on my talk page requesting feedback.

I've posted my observations at Talk:Outline of forestry.

Please take a look at the outline and let Minnecologies know what you think of it on the outline's talk page.

Thank you.

 Th e Tr ans hu man ist   19:37, 29 June 2009 (UTC) Delivered by JCbot (talk) at 20:15, 29 June 2009 (UTC).

Quick request
Hi Julian -

A quick request for your administrator powers. Could you move the sub-page Talk:Andalusian horse/Temp to the main Andalusian horse page? A couple of the equine editors have been working on a new version of the article on a temp page, and now it's ready to go into the main space, but we don't want to lose the history. After the move, the sub-page can be deleted. Thanks so much! Dana boomer (talk) 20:29, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Wow, thanks for the quick response! Dana boomer (talk) 20:34, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

OOK's highest priority task – here's a piece of it for you
Julian,

The government branches sections are in error on many of the country outlines.

Since those are in article space, we need to fix those ASAP! This is our most important task right now.

Here's a list of links that goes right to that section: User:The Transhumanist/List of country outline government sections.

I'm working on U-Z.

Your task is to complete and correct these:


 * Outline of East Timor
 * Outline of Ecuador
 * Outline of Egypt
 * Outline of El Salvador
 * Outline of Equatorial Guinea
 * Outline of Eritrea
 * Outline of Estonia
 * Outline of Ethiopia

WP:LINKY is especially useful for this.

Thank you.

Good luck.

Have fun.

 Th e Tr ans hu man ist   21:49, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Take me off list
Please take my off the Outline newsletter list. Thanks. RichardF (talk) 23:43, 29 June 2009 (UTC)


 * ✅  Th e Tr ans hu man ist    01:55, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Sent
– Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 20:18, 29 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Thank you.


 * And congrats on the bot approval.  Th e Tr ans hu man ist   20:53, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

ITN
Hi, you've posted the China train incident, could you see to the Volvo Ocean Race as well? It's quite far down the page but it has a new image as well. Thanks, I'm doing the European floods now. -- can  dle • wicke  01:58, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia Signpost <span style="color:#666; font-variant: small-caps; font-size:80%; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">: 29 June 2009 ==


 * News and notes: Jackson's death, new data center, more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Google News Support, Wired editor plagiarizes Wikipedia, Rohde's kidnapping, Michael Jackson
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:02, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

ITN credits
Hi, I see you added new items to ITN. Can you hand out credits, as instructed here? Thanks. --BorgQueen (talk) 02:17, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. :D -- can  dle • wicke  02:25, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I removed the Chinese train entry; the article is too short. You mentioned "Will work on adding additional content asap." You have to add the content first, then update. We don't add short articles first and expand them later. --BorgQueen (talk) 02:28, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, we normally don't feature stub articles. --BorgQueen (talk) 02:33, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry to butt in but in fairness myself and some others did say it was a support after the update took place. -- can  dle • wicke  03:04, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Amazing Race Wikipedia Starts!
Hello, Shappy. This is a reminder that Amazing Race Wikipedia will start very soon. At 00.00 (or whereabouts), our host Firestorm will place the first Detour on your submissions page. Again, the Detour is a choice between two tasks; both members of the team choose one task and work together to complete it. A Roadblock is a task only one team member must perform; he/she may not have any help from the other team member. Good luck and enjoy the Race! :-)  and  --EdwardsBot (talk) 13:33, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Deprodding of Eastern Software System
I have removed the tag from Eastern Software System, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Articles for deletion. Thanks!

Hurricane Andreas
The NHC said that is was most likely stronger in the morning. Plus the Main Page for the season also says it. Darkspace72

Please Restore List of Software Companies in Bangalore link
Hi Julian,

Requesting you to restore the link for List of Software Companies in Bangalore. It was a nice list to get info about different companies. It was very much helpful for job seekers.

Looking forward to your co-operation.

- Sibasis

Bangalore

Removal of Steve Holter article.
The article was written about me, and I was asked by Wiki if it was ok, I thought it was quite good, so why have you delelted it?

Steve Holter article
Can you out the above article back? It had links to other pages, it was verified, can't see why it was removed, especially as much of the text from my book on Sir Malcolm and Donald Campbell has been lifted without permission and appears on Wiki pages on the Campbells and Blue Bird and Bluebrid vehicles. Only the info' lifted for the Rolls-Royce R type article has any acknowledgement!!

I have also been accused of "vandalising" the Reid Railton, I removed a reference to a book by Barry Stobart-Hook. I did this after contacting Wiki, as Railton's daughter strongly disagrees with the content of this book and wishes to discuss it with Mr Stobart-Hook. I expalined this and was told to remove it, I then got quite a rude message telling me to leave it alone!!

I am quite happy to proof read land/water speed related articles, but having my many years of research "borrowed" is a tad annoying!!

Many thanks

Steve Holter

Steve Holter Article/Reid railton Article
I understand your comments fully, the article was written about me, (with links to Blue bIrd, Arthur Benjamins, British Racing drivers etc, it was verified, can't see why it was removed, especially as much of the text from my book on Sir Malcolm and Donald Campbell has been lifted without permission and appears on Wiki pages on the Campbells and Blue Bird and Bluebrid vehicles. Only the info' lifted for the Rolls-Royce R type article has any acknowledgement!!

I have also been accused of "vandalising" the Reid Railton, I removed a reference to a book by Barry Stobart-Hook. I did this after contacting Wiki, as Railton's daughter strongly disagrees with the content of this book and wishes to discuss it with Mr Stobart-Hook. I expalined this and was told to remove it, I then got quite a rude message telling me to leave it alone!!

I am quite happy to proof read land/water speed related articles, but having my many years of research "borrowed" is a tad annoying!!

Many thanks

Steve Holter