User talk:Shatterzer0

Thanks

 * I wasn't sure how to add the template to the band page, I appreciate you doing that for me. Stupid5pin 09:29, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * On the Korn article, I wasn't trying to be a jerk I just thought that "spiritual" reasons wasn't a good explanation. I appriciate your band contributions by the way. Falconsfanboy
 * It was the first article I ever contributed to or started, thats why it primarily sucked. Thanks for supporting! Oh and it's always great to meet a fellow Metalhead, thanks for liking good music.Caboose is good 05:01, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

No Thanks
Shatterzer0, you accused me of defacing Hank Aaron's article while in fact I was attempting to fix the vandalism. A 3 year old with down syndrome could have figured out what happened, especially since my comments as I was editing were explicit. You are a fucking moron and screw you very much for your years of help on Wikipedia 66.93.203.199 02:47, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * You're a user, not an admin, yet several times you have accused me of "Vandalism" and threatened to block me. What power have you to do so?  What is the policy for dealing with users who do naught but threaten other users?  I believe your behavior is exceedingly out of line, and further you continue to threaten me when a review of the history will show that I was dealing with a reversion by a previous user not marked as RVV.  66.93.203.199 03:20, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Shatterzer0, you can be mad all you like but you messed up and I called you on it. You can be upset if you like, but speedying me while I was editing hank aaron is also against wikipedia policy.  Before you ever edited the page you should have reviewed my notes to see what I was trying to acomplish, and reviewed the article before making accusations of vandalism. 66.93.203.199 22:42, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Warning vandals
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made, you may already know about them, but you might find Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. -Panser Born-  (talk)  10:07, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Cool
Some cool edits to Metal related articles - if you need any advice or help on Wikipedia then message me as I'd like to be of assistance if needed. LuciferMorgan 03:01, 21 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Just wondering, but is there a specific article you're working on at the moment for GA / FA? LuciferMorgan 15:18, 11 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Ah right, that sounds alright. I reckon if you worked on some specific articles though, you could maybe notch up a few GAs. LuciferMorgan 18:32, 13 July 2007 (UTC)


 * To qualify as a GA, the Soilwork article needs more work. If you're willing to put the effort in, I'm more than happy to give you advice on how to do so. LuciferMorgan 12:10, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Feedback for "Soilwork"

 * 1) As you've noticed, all the inline citations (sources) need to be properly formatted. I did two as examples for you, and all the others need to follow this format.
 * 2) The article has a "Trivia" section, which isn't needed. You need to integrate any noteworthy information into the article, and whatever unecncylopaedic info is left needs to be removed.
 * 3) A better range of sources are needed. Rather than solely relying on Blabbermouth, try using a bunch of webzine interviews to your advantage.
 * 4) Introduction needs work, and needs to summarise the topic in question. Check the Slayer article for an example.
 * 5) The article needs a copyedit. The word "would" creeps up all too often when it doesn't need to. For example; "Soilwork would begin work on a demo entitled In Dreams We Fall into the Eternal Lake." This could be simply changed to "Soilwork began work on a demo entitled In Dreams We Fall into the Eternal Lake."

I hope all this helps. LuciferMorgan 21:10, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Sonic Syndicate
The Sjunesson's are all brothers according to the official press release for their album from Nuclear Blast. LuciferMorgan 21:59, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Re:Christian Alvestam
No problem. Yea, he sure is notable, his voice is amazing clean or growled! I'm not the greatest writer either (though my family says I should be a journalist or even review writer but I don't like the idea of being one). If you need help with anything I'll be sure to spruce it up a bit. See you around. − ₪ÇɨгcaғucɨҲ₪  kaiden  04:28, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Hey, sorry for the late reply I didn't realize what you said was a question until now. Yea, I should try to listen to it a bit more but imo I think the song needs a bit more growls but I'll be fine if the album has more brutal tracks. Sounds like good stuff anyway. Can't wait for it! − ₪ÇɨгcaғucɨҲ₪  kaiden  22:06, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

(b/B)loodsimple
I knew somewhere on wikipedia there were rules for this type of situation, but forgot specifically where so I just posted the first few things i could find on capitalization. The first one does say all titles of articles should have the first word capitalized, but neither of them say anything about capitalization within the article of a band that is know for a lowercase name. That was me being sloppy, and I apologize. I did just now find at WikiProject Music/MUSTARD/Capitalization that "Standard English text formatting and capitalization rules apply to the names of bands and individual artists." It then links to MOSTM where it discusses what to do with a lowercase trademark (in this case a band) and uses Adidas and Craigslist as examples of trademarks with lowercase titles on wikipedia with uppercase titles. Fezmar9 (talk) 03:48, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
 * So, have we reached an agreement...? Fezmar9 (talk) 04:01, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

I didn't know it was a violation myself until recently when I was watching an edit war over a similar issue. Fezmar9 (talk) 04:51, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Regarding Winds of Plague
Hey there. Just wanted to say that I have no desire to edit war over this issue, but I remain unconvinced that Winds of Plague fulfill WP:MUSIC. Requirement 4 of said quideline demands non-trivial coverage of the band on tour; the sources you have provided simply list them as being on the tour... that is clearly trivial mention. Requirement 6 demands a member of another notable band; your only option there is an ex-bass player in a borderline notable band that probably need a Notability banner themselves. For the time-being I'm going to restore the notability tag until non-trivial sources are found. As I've said before, I have no interest in edit-warring, so if the tag is removed again without additional non-trivial sources, we can go to AfD. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 19:57, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Awake (Skillet album)
I don't know what's going on with this article, I never heard of the band or the album, but I did revert a large blanking of the article. Can you explain your revert here? I'm not saying you're wrong, just trying to figure out what's going on. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 06:31, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Renderedinvain.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Renderedinvain.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 07:25, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Stemmlogo.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:Stemmlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 23:12, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:20584ab0cc0d.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:20584ab0cc0d.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:00, 28 January 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 04:00, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2002 Demo


The article 2002 Demo has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for albums.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 17:04, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Evolution Overdose
I have nominated Evolution Overdose, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Evolution Overdose. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:30, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:B0001AW0LQ.01. AA240 SCLZZZZZZZ .jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:B0001AW0LQ.01. AA240 SCLZZZZZZZ .jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 23:30, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mute EP


The article Mute EP has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for albums.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 14:12, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mute-cover-large.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Mute-cover-large.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:51, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Evolutionoverdose.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Evolutionoverdose.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:51, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Another Tomorrow


The article Another Tomorrow has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for albums.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 17:31, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Another-cd-cover-large.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Another-cd-cover-large.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Neelix (talk) 15:58, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Scarlet Records


The article Scarlet Records has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non notable record company - fails WP:CORP ONLY claim to any form of notability is one of WP:INHERITANCE through bands.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Codf1977 (talk) 12:33, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Scarlet Records
I have nominated Scarlet Records, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Scarlet Records. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Codf1977 (talk) 12:28, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:20584ab0cc0d.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:20584ab0cc0d.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:31, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 18:37, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Burnt by the Sun / Burst


The article Burnt by the Sun / Burst has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONGS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 19:38, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Stemmfurtherefforts.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Stemmfurtherefforts.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:40, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bedtime Prayers


The article Bedtime Prayers has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Doesn't meet WP:NALBUM / WP:GNG. Not redirecting, as ambiguous title."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 18:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bedtime Prayers (Blinded Colony album - cover art).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bedtime Prayers (Blinded Colony album - cover art).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ~ GB fan 17:39, 30 April 2024 (UTC)