User talk:Toussaint

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 20:38, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nahuatl Wikipedia
A tag has been placed on Nahuatl Wikipedia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — Gavia immer (talk) 21:29, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Immanuel (town)
The section you added should be made into its own article and instead merely summarized on the town page. --Shuki (talk) 21:34, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Shalom, The article is now up. Thanks for the tip. --Toussaint (talk) 22:20, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ilê Pérola Negra


The article Ilê Pérola Negra has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable, unsourced

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:55, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Matthew Vanderpool
I have nominated Matthew Vanderpool, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Matthew Vanderpool. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Raymie Humbert (t • c) 03:55, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Nigerian traditional rulers


The article List of Nigerian traditional rulers has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * fails WP:LIST - all entries in the list (with 1 exception) do not have articles - notability of the entries is not established

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Amsaim (talk) 22:20, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

BLP and blogs
Please remember that we can't use regular blogs in biographies. The two exceptions are blogs written by the biography subjects, for assertions about themselves only, and blogs hosted by mainstream news agencies. See WP:BLP and WP:V.  Will Beback   talk    08:17, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of List of Nigerian traditional rulers
I have nominated List of Nigerian traditional rulers, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/List of Nigerian traditional rulers. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Amsaim (talk) 21:37, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of 2010 Discovery Communications headquarters hostage crisis
I have nominated 2010 Discovery Communications headquarters hostage crisis, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/2010 Discovery Communications headquarters hostage crisis. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  — fetch ·  comms   03:18, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

would love your collaboration
http://www.afropedea.com http://www.afropedea.org —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.186.48.62 (talk) 02:51, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Next constitution of Zimbabwe for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Next constitution of Zimbabwe, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Next constitution of Zimbabwe until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:57, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Your additions to Gamebook
Hi. Thank you for your recent additions to the article Gamebook relating to addventures, which deepen and improve that article. However, (a) addventures are neither games nor books. While they are definitely related to the topic of "gamebooks" you might give some thought to how to better explain their relevance to article. And (b) as with all content on Wikipedia your addition is required to be referenced; could you please add references supporting your addition, as it is not obviously on its face either notable or factual (though I'm sure you can establish that with a reference). Thanks! - DustFormsWords (talk) 05:38, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Video game engines
Template:Video game engines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Addionne (talk) 15:55, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Template:African coups d'état
Hi, nice template! Did you mean to add the 2010 Ecuador crisis? -- Beloved Freak  11:22, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Biased editing of Technological Utopianism by Loremaster.
Biased editing of Technological Utopianism by Loremaster.

Due to your past contribution to Technological utopianism, you may currently want to help editing the Technological utopianism article because currently only one editor is contributing to the article. The Singularitarianism Article could also benefit from your help.

I feel Loremaster is editing Singularitarianism and Technological utopianism in a biased manner in accordance with his Save The Earth propaganda. Loremasters's ideology seems to verge towards Neo-Luddism. Here are the damming facts Loremaster has stated in discussion:


 * Loremaster says he is:


 * Loremaster wants people to:


 * Loremaster sees his editing as a 'fight' and he states:

81.151.135.248 (talk) 12:23, 18 December 2010 (UTC)JB

--Loremaster (talk) 00:58, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * LOL
 * 1) Despite the fact that I openly admit to being a technorealist who is critical of techno-utopianism in all its forms, I have let never this point of view influence any of my edits or reverts of the Technological utopianism or Singularitarianism articles. On the contrary, I am the person most responsible for expanding the former article with content some would argue is “pro-techno-utopian” (i.e. passages from James Hughes' book Citizen Cyborg).
 * 2) I find it disgusting that 81.151.135.248 would take comments I made out of context to falsely make it seem I see my editing of any article as part of my fight for the environment.
 * 3) In light of this outrageous act of bad faith, I will do everything in my power to get this jerk banned from Wikipedia.

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mac OS X HTML editors
Template:Mac OS X HTML editors has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Fleet Command (talk) 17:25, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Vegetarian and vegan media
Category:Vegetarian and vegan media, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:12, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ethnicity in Atlanta
Template:Ethnicity in Atlanta has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji 00:19, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Features of Twitter


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Features of Twitter. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Twitter. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Twitter - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. &mdash; RHaworth 12:58, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:SWAMandateAdmins
Template:SWAMandateAdmins has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji 21:24, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:LagosState-FedRep
Template:LagosState-FedRep has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:48, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mayors of Rishon LeZion
Template:Mayors of Rishon LeZion has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:32, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:South African ties
Template:South African ties has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:04, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

David Kato
Hi Toussaint... I wanted to let you know that I have nominated the article on David Kato to be considered for an appearance on the main page in the Did You Know ...? section. The nomination can be seen at Template talk:Did you know. You are most welcome to participate in the discussion of the nomination, should you wish. If the nomination is successful, you will be recognised as one of the authors who contributed significantly to the article. Regards, EdChem (talk) 06:03, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

DYK for David Kato
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   06:05, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

New York
If you want add informations about rights of same-sex couples, you should edit Same-sex marriage in New York article. The second article about exactly the same topic is dispensable. Your article had any sources. Ron 1987 (talk) 01:27, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The reason for the separate article is because same-sex marriage is not performable in the state, and the issue of marriage recognition in the state is a subset of the general topic of recognition of same-sex unions, of which the state allows for one in-borders: unregistered cohabitation. Source: . --Toussaint (talk) 05:28, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 1. Source is about adoption, not about recognition of same-sex unions. 2. All informations about recognition of same-sex unions in concrete jurisdiction should be in one article. If you want, you can change Same-sex marriage in New York article's title to Recognition of same-sex unions in New York. Perhaps this title is more appropriate. Ron 1987 (talk) 22:43, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The latter is actually what I wanted. I'm surprised that it uses its current title. --Toussaint (talk) 00:57, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:SACorrectionalMinisters
Template:SACorrectionalMinisters has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 03:05, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

SPLC hate groups
Hey, I'm not sure if you're aware of this, but I've actually been working on and off for months on a list of groups designated as hate groups, and I hope you don't mind my saying that mine is better linked and referenced (I'm only including groups with working bluelinks, while yours has many redlinks and also some bluelinks that go to the wrong things, and everything on mine is cited; mine also includes the Anti-Defamation League's listings, per a weak consensus at talk:splc). Why don't we collaborate? My draft is at User:Roscelese/List of designated hate groups. I'd definitely appreciate your help, especially given that the SPLC list has just been updated again. Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 05:00, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Just looked at it. It looks better organized and has both SPLC and ADL listings. I can work with you on it, but a few points:


 * I don't know if Rationale is where we could insert SPLC's "ideology" classifications or not.
 * I'm kinda divided on including both listings or separating them.
 * Let's clarify in the title that this list pertains to United States-based organizations. I'm sure that publications in other countries (Searchlight in the UK, for example) might also have their own hate group listings since they engage in tracking them. --Toussaint (talk) 11:05, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I wasn't actually sure what to do about Rationale. For some of the groups, there are good quotes about why they were listed, but for some we just have their classification. Should we try to include a rationale for all of them, or just the ones with specific quotes? (The other problem is that ADL does not classify in the same way. For this reason I'm thinking just quotes would be better. Do you mind if I revert until we figure out how to make it work?)
 * What do you think would be the merits of keeping them in one table vs. separating?
 * Ooooh, that's a great point about Searchlight. I wonder if they do have a list.

-- Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 15:46, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Alex Jones (radio host)
Template:Alex Jones (radio host) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 10:41, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

March 2011
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to One Mic. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 08:32, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm restoring this section because there was no reason for why there was no synopsis in the first place. Furthermore, I cited a credible source from MTV. --Toussaint (talk) 10:15, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to One Mic. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The content in question, the uncited "synopsis" material, must be cited properly, and the burden lies with you to provide a source. Consider this template, and please review Wikipedia's guidelines on citing sources, as it will help you make more constructive edits in the future.
 * This was not a threat. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines that we must all conform to if we are to make constructive edits, and there is no room for our own "justification". Dan56 (talk) 21:13, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Blogs about the environment and environmentalism
Category:Blogs about the environment and environmentalism, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 01:08, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Cockburn family
If you plan to add more of these, please would you add |Adam or whatever. Who is included? Anyone with the surname? Kittybrewster  &#9742;  09:29, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Politics in South Africa
Hey, I just wanted to drop a line and say thanks for you recent edits on South African municipal elections, 2011. I am busy tabulating the results for KZN which should be done sometime this afternoon. If you are still committed to what you have said on your userpage I certainly hope that you come to South Africa. We need people like you! :D Much <3, User:DiscipleOfKnowledge (talk) 09:39, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
 * It would be interesting to come down in the future. Thanks! --Toussaint (talk) 02:48, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Rick Welts
The DYK project (nominate) 08:04, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problem
Hello. The Wikimedia Foundation has received a complaint from the copyright holder about content you placed on Wikipedia in March 2009. Specifically, material you added to the article Optical computing was substantially copied from. Archives confirm that they published this content prior to its placement on Wikipedia, so there is no chance that it was placed in this article first. Certainly, it does not look good on the project when copyright owners notice their material being unlawfully used.

As this took place over two years ago, it is possible that you are now aware that Wikipedia's policies do not permit importing text from previously published sources unless you are able to verify that this material is public domain or compatibly licensed. However, I see that you were advised of copyright policy in 2007, several years before you pasted this material, so I cannot presume that this is true. Please be sure you are familiar with copyright policy, as we are required to block access to Wikipedia to individuals who repeatedly infringe copyright to remain compliant with US law. When content is marked "All Rights Reserved", as this source is, there really is no question. But if you aren't sure if content is usable, you should seek feedback. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:39, 5 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Ah, this is a different issue. It seems that you actually copied content from one article to another, so were undoubtedly unaware of the copyright problem in the text. I need to go back further to see where it came in to Optical computer. You may, since March 2009, have become aware of procedures for attributing text copied from one article to another, but in case not I'll explain that content on Wikipedia is also not public domain; it's fine to copy it from one article to another, but you must attribute it to the original authors. Besides complying with license requirements, this has the benefit of helping investigations of this sort, as the history of text can be more easily traced. (In this case, the only reason I realized it was not yours was because the content you copied included fact from December 2010.) You can see more about this at Help:Merge and Help:Split, as well as the more recently created comprehensive Copy-paste. If you have copied content from other articles in the past - even if it was a long time ago - please repair attribution for license compliance. (I've repaired this one:, , , ) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:46, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Elie Frizli


The article Elie Frizli has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 14:20, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Adele Cohen
Hi. If you can, please consider completing this article with  personal  biographical details. Thanks. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:14, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Augustine Chihuri


The article Augustine Chihuri has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Completely unsourced BLP since 2008. Fails WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 21:00, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Adele Cohen
Hi.This article is still insufficiently referenced. The only sources are primary, and ones that  only  contain  a fleeting  reference that  does not  cover the subject  in  depth  or support any of the biographical  content. If you can, please consider completing this article before it  is proposed for deletion. Thanks. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:49, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, I've cited as much as I can possibly pull up at this time. Information on the woman is scant save for whatever is published in NYT and Salon, but I've already, more than sufficiently, proven that she exists. --Toussaint (talk) 05:59, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

LGBT Finland
Hi! Looks like e reasonable edit, great. :) Anyway, could you please finish your job by providing the sources for the second paragraph (The 2000s has also seen... etc.). (Surprise, surprise, the reason why I left it without the footnotes was that the stuff was dealt with in the rest of the article.) Thanks! -- Frous (talk) 16:25, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Category:Awards juries and committees
In and  you added the non-existent Category:Awards juries and committees. Are you planning to create it? Articles should only be in existing categories. PrimeHunter (talk) 21:36, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Completely new abortion proposal and mediation
In light of the seemingly endless disputes over their respective titles, a neutral mediator has crafted a proposal to rename the two major abortion articles (pro-life/anti-abortion movement, and pro-choice/abortion rights movement) to completely new names. The idea, which is located here, is currently open for opinions. As you have been a contributor in the past to at least one of the articles, your thoughts on the matter would be appreciated.

The hope is that, if a consensus can be reached on the article titles, the energy that has been spent debating the titles of the articles here and here can be better spent giving both articles some much needed improvement to their content. Please take some time to read the proposal and weigh in on the matter. Even if your opinion is simple indifference, that opinion would be valuable to have posted.

To avoid accusations that this posting violates WP:CANVASS, this posting is being made to every non-anon editor who has edited either page since 1 July 2010, irrespective of possible previous participation at the mediation page. HuskyHuskie (talk) 20:06, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of FFmpeg hosting service for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FFmpeg hosting service is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/FFmpeg hosting service until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Marokwitz (talk) 10:54, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Aiii
I expanded refs on User:Toussaint/Carrier Instant Messenger without thinking to ask first - hope that's cool. --Lexein (talk) 04:01, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Independent city (United States)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Independent city (United States), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://gnosis.cx/download/pywikipedia/cache/Independent%20city.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:47, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mobile wiki


A tag has been placed on Mobile wiki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Albacore (talk) 20:12, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Merge discussion for YouTube
An article that you have been involved in editing, YouTube, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. JC Rules! (talk) 03:41, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Features of YouTube


The article Features of YouTube has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This is a duplicate page of YouTube. Most information on this page is mentioned in the article, YouTube. If this page only focuses on different features of YouTube within seven days, this page may not be deleted. Consider removing the sections and contents of Video Technology, Content accessibility, and Localization.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JC Rules! (talk) 04:28, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Libyan War Timeline reverse backdate?
Hi! Just wondered what made you "undo" my edit on this article last night. My edit was to clarify that these events could hardly have taken place during the 21st of August, as reports of them were put there some eight minutes past midnight, Libyan time (i e _not_ Qatari/Al Jazeera time ;-) )! My wording edit was also to get closer to what the sources said and avoid a feeling that someone put these lines there as pure "propaganda" (it seemed somewhat fishy). Many thanks in advance for clarification.--Paracel63 (talk) 12:28, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Research Advice re General People's Committee Article
Dear Toussaint,

I am writing a research paper on the history of Libyan political personnel and came across a wiki article you contributed to, which I translated from Arabic to English using google. The article is entitled “General People’s Committee” and can be accessed as follows: http://ar.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/اللجنة_الشعبية_العامة This article is exactly what I’m looking for, but there is a historical hole from 1990 – 2006. Do you have any idea why these dates are missing from the article? Do you have any information on this topic pertaining to 1990 – 2006 or know of any other sources I can consult to find the missing information? I have to submit my paper to my professor by Monday morning, so if you could prove any help at all, I would truly appreciate it! Please feel free to contact me directly via e-mail at agreen789@yahoo.com.

Thank you in advance for your time and hope to hear from you soon!

Sincerely, Ann Green — Preceding unsigned comment added by AGreen789 (talk • contribs) 19:57, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Fictional characters on the autistic spectrum
Category:Fictional characters on the autistic spectrum, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 14:30, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:South Africa topic


A tag has been placed on Template:South Africa topic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bulwersator (talk) 15:54, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ahmed Rifaat (judge)


A tag has been placed on Ahmed Rifaat (judge) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mattg82 (talk) 02:55, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ahmed Rifaat (judge)


The article Ahmed Rifaat (judge) has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Mattg82 (talk) 14:34, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Category:Vegetarian and vegan media
Category:Vegetarian and vegan media, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:57, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Proposed merge
Please see the discussion at Talk:Straight_pride. Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 04:13, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Spider-Man (1994 TV series)
Template:Spider-Man (1994 TV series) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Cerebellum (talk) 01:31, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Straight pride for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Straight pride is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Straight pride (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WormTT  &middot; &#32;(talk) 18:07, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Haitian Creole Wikipedia


The article Haitian Creole Wikipedia has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable website, per WP:NOTABLE, composed of first-hand sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:47, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Quechua Wikipedia


The article Quechua Wikipedia has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable website, per WP:NOTABLE, composed of first-hand sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:57, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Quechua Wikipedia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quechua Wikipedia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Quechua Wikipedia (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:58, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Non-conversionary religion


The article Non-conversionary religion has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable usage

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Editor2020 (talk) 02:25, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Unity Fellowship Church Movement


The article Unity Fellowship Church Movement has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of satisfying the notability guidelines. No sources are cited, and looking at the first 30 Google hits I found not a single independent reliable source.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:58, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of List of AT&T U-verse channels for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of AT&T U-verse channels is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of AT&T U-verse channels until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. M ASEM (t) 13:40, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/List of AT&T U-verse channels
FYI, I thought you'd want to know:
 * Articles for deletion/List of AT&T U-verse channels

I invite you to give your two cents, whether positive, negative or something in between. You've put a lot of work into this article in the past. -- A. B. (talk • contribs) 16:32, 25 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Ooops, I didn't see the note just above mine. Well, consider yourself doubly invited.
 * -- A. B. (talk • contribs) 16:36, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Big Easy Metropolitan Community Church for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Big Easy Metropolitan Community Church is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Big Easy Metropolitan Community Church until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ryan Vesey 02:11, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Just to let you know
You have been mentioned at Missing Wikipedians  Ottawahitech (talk) 01:00, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Lili Francks for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lili Francks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lili Francks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:51, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Census Factfinder broken link
The reference to the American Community Survey 2000 —- which has been part of LGBT demographics of the United States since you created that article last year — is broken because the Census website has changed. I tried to figure out how to reproduce the original query but wasn't able. If you were the original editor to add this reference, do you think you might take a stab at it? Ibadibam (talk) 23:52, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ebrahim Moosa


A tag has been placed on Ebrahim Moosa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 12:13, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Members of the Cape Town City Council for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Members of the Cape Town City Council is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Members of the Cape Town City Council until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Peridon (talk) 13:31, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Content syndication markup language


The article Content syndication markup language has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced, no indication that "content syndication markup language" is a term of any great note in that specific form. As this article has neither content nor sources, it is only justified if we have to cover this specific term. Otherwise the existing articles under "web syndication" are perfectly adequate.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:27, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Saiyuki
Template:Saiyuki has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 00:46, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Tkhtml.PNG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Tkhtml.PNG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:52, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Appeal to psychology for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Appeal to psychology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Appeal to psychology until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Insulam Simia (talk/contribs) 20:33, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Spanish Creoles


A tag has been placed on Template:Spanish Creoles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Lfdder (talk) 13:04, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Afro-Asiatic-speaking nations
Template:Afro-Asiatic-speaking nations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Lfdder (talk) 14:51, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:African Union languages
Template:African Union languages has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Lfdder (talk) 23:47, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Southern African Development Community
Template:Southern African Development Community has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 05:25, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Metsweding District Municipality
Template:Metsweding District Municipality has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 13:57, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Desktop Linux for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Desktop Linux is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Desktop Linux until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Codename Lisa (talk) 15:12, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Microsoft executives
Template:Microsoft executives has been nominated for merging with Template:Microsoft. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. ...William 14:27, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Discovery Communications headquarters hostage crisis for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Discovery Communications headquarters hostage crisis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Discovery Communications headquarters hostage crisis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Beerest 2 talk 20:21, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of PerlTop for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PerlTop is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/PerlTop until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 16:00, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of video hosting software


The article List of video hosting software has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Orphaned SOL with 3 items that doesn't make a case for SOL notability beyond what a category could be used for.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  |  16:04, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Immutable characteristic for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Immutable characteristic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Immutable characteristic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ansh 666 23:41, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Pride 2014
Hi Toussaint. In case you are not aware, there is an upcoming campaign to improve coverage of LGBT-related topics on Wikipedia, culminating with an international edit-a-thon on June 21. See Wiki Loves Pride 2014 for more information. If you are interested, you might consider creating a page for a major city (or cities!) near you, with a list of LGBT-related articles that need to be created or improved. This would be a tremendous help to Wikipedia and coverage of LGBT culture and history. Thanks for your consideration, and please let me know if you have any questions! -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:27, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cape Town City Council members
Template:Cape Town City Council members has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Banner talk 21:57, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Category:9th Kenyan Parliament
Category:9th Kenyan Parliament, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Armbrust The Homunculus 07:08, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Category:10th Kenyan Parliament
Category:10th Kenyan Parliament, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Armbrust The Homunculus 07:08, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Gilbert Lawrence for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gilbert Lawrence is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gilbert Lawrence until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 12:31, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Average age of incumbent legislators for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Average age of incumbent legislators is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Average age of incumbent legislators until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 18:10, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of ANC Today for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ANC Today is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/ANC Today until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. eh bien mon prince (talk) 23:18, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lagos Metropolitan Area Transport Authority


A tag has been placed on Lagos Metropolitan Area Transport Authority, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://www.lamata-ng.com/background.php. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. hey zec!  04:55, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of SmilScript


The article SmilScript has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unnotable programming language. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NSOFT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &#8213; Padenton &#124;&#9993;  15:26, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Haiti
Hi Toussaint, I saw your participation in the "WikiProject Caribbean" and thought I'd extend the invite to a completely revamped WikiProject Haiti. Cheers! Savvyjack23 (talk) 05:23, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Pride!
 You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride!


 * What? Wiki Loves Pride, a campaign to document and photograph LGBT culture and history, including pride events
 * When? June 2015
 * How can you help?
 * 1.) Create or improve LGBT-related articles and showcase the results of your work here
 * 2.) Upload photographs or other media related to LGBT culture and history, including pride events, and add images to relevant Wikipedia articles; feel free to create a subpage with a gallery of your images (see examples from last year)
 * 3.) Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)

Or, view or update the current list of Tasks. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. Visit the group's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome!

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's main talk page.

Thanks, and happy editing!

User:Another Believer and User:OR drohowa

Nomination of Shadow government (Israel) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shadow government (Israel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Shadow government (Israel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGtal (talk) 20:54, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:3D virtual worlds
Template:3D virtual worlds has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. K.Nevelsteen (talk) 12:45, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shadow government (Israel)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Shadow government (Israel), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jersey92 (talk) 03:33, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mahkamah


The article Mahkamah has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Wikipedia is not a dictionary.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sam Walton (talk) 09:07, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Arbitrary censorship for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arbitrary censorship is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Arbitrary censorship until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sam Walton (talk) 09:11, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Chat log for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chat log is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Chat log until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sam Walton (talk) 00:15, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:South African Parliament Party Leaders
Template:South African Parliament Party Leaders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Wayne Jayes (talk) 10:10, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Pride 2016
As a participant of WikiProject LGBT studies, you are invited to participate in the third annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign, which runs through the month of June. The purpose of the campaign is to create and improve content related to LGBT culture and history. How can you help?
 * Create or improve LGBT-related Wikipedia pages and showcase the results of your work here
 * Document local LGBT culture and history by taking pictures at pride events and uploading your images to Wikimedia Commons
 * Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)

Looking for topics? The Tasks page, which you are welcome to update, offers some ideas and wanted articles.

This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. The group's mission is to develop LGBT-related content across all Wikimedia projects, in all languages. Visit the affiliate's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's talk page.

Thanks, and happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:50, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Qsoclogo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Qsoclogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Divisions and sections of composed works has been nominated for discussion
Category:Divisions and sections of composed works, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:17, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Time-based economics has been nominated for discussion
Category:Time-based economics, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:04, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Second Life in popular culture for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Second Life in popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Second Life in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 00:10, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Green Initiative


A tag has been placed on Green Initiative requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Me-123567-Me (talk) 20:51, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Google Research listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Google Research. Since you had some involvement with the Google Research redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 03:47, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:SA district navigation box
Template:SA district navigation box has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:20, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Chris Liddell for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Liddell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Chris Liddell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:25, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Green Initiative


A tag has been placed on Green Initiative requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Me-123567-Me (talk) 22:21, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of AsiaPacific Outgames


The article AsiaPacific Outgames has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable sports event.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:02, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of George Soros conspiracy theories for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article George Soros conspiracy theories is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/George Soros conspiracy theories& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SW3 5DL (talk) 19:19, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of David Doonan


A tag has been placed on David Doonan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jone Rohne Nester (talk) 20:15, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current Scottish MSPs
Template:Current Scottish MSPs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 08:47, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Processing units
Template:Processing units has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:35, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

We're on Twitter!
RachelWex 19:00, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Macon elections
Template:Macon elections has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:10, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:SudKivuGovernors
Template:SudKivuGovernors has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:16, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of List of organizations designated by the Southern Poverty Law Center as hate groups for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of organizations designated by the Southern Poverty Law Center as hate groups is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of organizations designated by the Southern Poverty Law Center as hate groups (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Proportional representation in presidential systems for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Proportional representation in presidential systems is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Proportional representation in presidential systems until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. B.Lameira (talk) 05:49, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ituri
Template:Ituri has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:45, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current members of New Zealand Parliament
Template:Current members of New Zealand Parliament has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:39, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:FrenchDahomeyAdministrators
Template:FrenchDahomeyAdministrators has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:00, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:South Africa topic
Template:South Africa topic has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:11, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Politburo of ZANU–PF


The article Politburo of ZANU–PF has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Notable topic without any sources"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 00:05, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Nomination of KaXUL for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KaXUL is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/KaXUL until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pmffl (talk) 17:13, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Craig Covey for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Craig Covey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Craig Covey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 19:32, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of David Doonan


The article David Doonan has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "clearly fails WP:POLITICIAN as not notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 19:18, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Farheen Hakeem


A tag has been placed on Farheen Hakeem requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Me-123567-Me (talk) 20:36, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Farheen Hakeem for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Farheen Hakeem is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Farheen Hakeem until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Me-123567-Me (talk) 02:13, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of GtkHTML


The article GtkHTML has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Looks like a minor project that was never all that relevant."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pmffl (talk) 20:30, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Comparison of layout engines (non-standard HTML)


The article Comparison of layout engines (non-standard HTML) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Obsolete info - hasn't been updated in at least 7 years"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pmffl (talk) 02:40, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Trinity LGBT
Hello, just to notify you that the article Trinity LGBT has been proposed for deletion because the topic of the article may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guidelines, the article relies largely or entirely on a single source and the article may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing the article from being verifiable and neutral. Senegambianamestudy (talk) 14:41, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:ZambiaProvincialMinisters
Template:ZambiaProvincialMinisters has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 19:51, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vice Versa (song)


The article Vice Versa (song) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 00:44, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:TamilNaduStatewideOfficials
Template:TamilNaduStatewideOfficials has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.  Zack mann  (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:24, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Parliamentary constituencies in Masvingo
Template:Parliamentary constituencies in Masvingo has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.  Zack mann  (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:16, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:New state and territory proposals Australia
Template:New state and territory proposals Australia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.  Zack mann  (Talk to me/What I been doing) 19:34, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Most networked ICT countries
Template:Most networked ICT countries has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.  Zack mann  (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:50, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Category:Gospel Music Hall of Fame inductees has been nominated for discussion
Category:Gospel Music Hall of Fame inductees, which you created, has been nominated for conversion into a list. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:33, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:Nigeria
Portal:Nigeria, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Nigeria and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Nigeria during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:35, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Eden II School for Autistic Children


The article Eden II School for Autistic Children has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication that subject meets WP:NORG"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jmertel23 (talk) 01:21, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:Zimbabwe
Portal:Zimbabwe, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Zimbabwe and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Zimbabwe during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:59, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Iraqi Kurdistan topics
Template:Iraqi Kurdistan topics has been nominated for merging with Template:Security (Kurdistan Region). You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 09:17, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Simon Grindrod for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Simon Grindrod is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Simon Grindrod until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

WikiProject Hinduism
 WikiProject Hinduism

Hello, Toussaint. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. We would like to introduce a newsletter to Wikiproject Hinduism. A newsletter is always help to inform recent changes in the project to project members and help for effective coordination. Now we have launched a new newsletter for the Wikiproject. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Also do not forget to contribute to the newsletter. Thank you!

 Subscribe

- Discuss this newsletter

Contribute

Subscribe/Unsubscribe

Archive

Sent by on behalf of WikiProject Hinduism. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:14, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current Zimbabwean MPs
Template:Current Zimbabwean MPs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:32, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Abraham Lincoln
Template:Abraham Lincoln has been nominated for merging with Template:Lincoln memorials. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 09:58, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of GNOME Mobile & Embedded Initiative for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GNOME Mobile & Embedded Initiative is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/GNOME Mobile & Embedded Initiative until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 14:39, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of List of first openly LGBT politicians in the United States for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of first openly LGBT politicians in the United States is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of first openly LGBT politicians in the United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America1000 11:12, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

"Template:Cute news" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Template:Cute news. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 21 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Dudhhr (talk) 17:57, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Queering Wikipedia 2021 User Group Working Days: May 14–16
The Wikimedia LGBTQ+ User Group is holding online working days in May. As a member of WikiProject LGBT studies, editing on LGBTQ+ issues or if you identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community, come help us set goals, develop our organisation and structures, consider how to respond to issues faced by Queer editors, and plan for the next 12 months.

We will be meeting online for 3 half-days, 14–16 May at 1400–1730 UTC. While our working language is English, we are looking to accommodate users who would prefer to participate in other languages, including translation facilities.

More information, and registration details, at QW2021 .--Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group 02:59, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Big Picture with Thom Hartmann


The article The Big Picture with Thom Hartmann has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No evidence of stand-alone notability as a TV show. Only sources are deprecated links for self-sourcing. WP:BEFORE shows no RS coverage. Needs third-party RS evidence of notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 13:43, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

"Template:Cute news" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Template:Cute news. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 13 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Sandstein  19:07, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of JavaScript library


The article JavaScript library has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This topic is too generic to be considered notable, especially since there is no JS standard library. For this reason, this article has basically no sources (the Khan Academy lesson is so generic that it does not even support the sentence it's posted after)."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Anton.bersh (talk) 10:48, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Electoral systems footer
Template:Electoral systems footer has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:54, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Unionized cooperative for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Unionized cooperative is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Unionized cooperative until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 12:14, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vanessa Davies


The article Vanessa Davies has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not satisfy WP:BASIC. Been in CAT:NN for almost 11 years."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – DarkGlow • 14:15, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:City of Cape Town government
Template:City of Cape Town government has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:17, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Christian Universalist Association


The article Christian Universalist Association has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Only referenced to its own website."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Youth Service Bureau for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Youth Service Bureau is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Youth Service Bureau until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pepper Beast   (talk)  23:35, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Garrett Michael Hayes


The article Garrett Michael Hayes has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. WP:BEFORE search failed to produce sourcing that satisfies the notability guidelines"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Vanessa Davies for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vanessa Davies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Vanessa Davies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:26, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Judaization


The article Judaization has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unencyclopedic content with original research concerns. Only sourced mention of the term is in reference to its opposite: 'de-Judaization' - no real evidence of widespread usage."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Iskandar323 (talk) 17:29, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of All Nepal Women's Association (Revolutionary)


The article All Nepal Women's Association (Revolutionary) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:ORG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yeti Dai (talk) 09:48, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Central Region Lesbian & Gay Pride


The article Central Region Lesbian & Gay Pride has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Could not find any sources by English and French name. Fails WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Abu Salim (Tripoli district) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Abu Salim (Tripoli district), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. FishandChipper 🐟🍟 11:25, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Abu Salim (Tripoli district)


Hello, Toussaint. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Abu Salim".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit  11:47, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for merger of Template:Life in South Africa
Template:Life in South Africa has been nominated for merging with Template:South Africa topics. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:47, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Going Nowhere Slowly


The article Going Nowhere Slowly has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The only source in the article seem to be primary, a quick Google search does not return any results that prove notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spinixster  (chat!)  11:36, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ahmed Rifaat (judge)


The article Ahmed Rifaat (judge) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "He does not seem to be notable outside of the Mubarak trial and should be merged with the trial."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spinixster  (chat!)  08:10, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for merger of Template:Tabernacle and Jerusalem Temples
Template:Tabernacle and Jerusalem Temples has been nominated for merging with Template:Temple Mount and Al-Aqsa. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Onceinawhile (talk) 08:48, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:CNN International personnel
Template:CNN International personnel has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- wooden superman  11:47, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 13th century in South Africa


The article 13th century in South Africa has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The Union of South Africa wasn't formed until 1910, about 600 years after the events in this article. The only item here is already in Mapungubwe"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Signers of the U.S. Declaration of Independence
Template:Signers of the U.S. Declaration of Independence has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- wooden superman  13:10, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Kdepim
Template:Kdepim has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. TappyTurtle &#91;talk &#124; contribs&#93; 15:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)