Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Organizations/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Request for article re-assessment

Hi there! I've been spending some time working on Toastmasters International, and I think it's really grown since it was originally assessed. You can see for yourself -- the originally assessed version is quite different from the current article. There's still a lot of room for improvement (and it would help if there were more external sources available online) but if only to give a feeling of validation to myself and the others who have edited the article for the past five and a half months I'd like someone to re-assess the article and perhaps comment on various ways I can make it better. Thanks! --coldacid (talk|contrib) 09:46, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

A shout out and thanks to Patrick Flaherty for reassessing the article. --coldacid (talk|contrib) 16:07, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

United Nations peer review

A peer review has been requested for the United Nations article here. You are welcome to add any suggestions/feedback on how to improve the page. Many thanks, --Joowwww (talk) 10:10, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sub-Aqua Association

Sub-Aqua Association, an article within the scope of this project, has been proposed for deletion. Your comments on the proposal page are welcomed. --RexxS (talk) 17:48, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Notability of residential colleges

A RFC has been submitted on the best way to deal with the existence of many Wikipedia articles on residence halls and dormitories at colleges and universities that may not be notable. The input and feedback of editors of this policy would be appreciated. Madcoverboy (talk) 17:12, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Washington Legal Foundation

I came across this article and tagged it with your project. APK thinks he's ready for his closeup 20:34, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

ASEAN needs cites

ASEAN was listed as a Good Article in March of 2007.

However, currently two sections of the article have been tagged "This section does not cite any references or sources" since May 2008, and another section since September 2008.

We should cite or remove this material. If we don't, we should de-list this article from status as a Good Article. -- 201.37.230.43 (talk) 16:52, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

GA Reassessment of ASEAN

Hello, I am notifying all relevant projects that ASEAN has been reassessed as part of the GA Sweeps project. I have found the article to not currently meet the GA Criteria. As such I have put it on hold for one week pending edits to improve its quality. My review is here. If anyone has questions please contact me at my talk page. H1nkles (talk) 21:22, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

FAR of MSF

I have nominated Médecins Sans Frontières for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Jclemens (talk) 05:37, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Relevant AfD

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbados Group. Thank you, Cirt (talk) 04:31, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Templates Infobox geopolitical organization and Infobox organization

There is a discussion if the Template:Infobox Geopolitical organization, redirecting now to the Template:Infobox country should be redirected to Template:Infobox organization. or if not, how to define in which cases it is appropriate to use the one or another infoboxes. You opinion is appreciated. Beagel (talk) 21:15, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Organizations up for renaming

FYI, several organization categories have been nominated for renaming, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 February 23. These include IEEE, ISO, 70.29.210.242 (talk) 06:34, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Philosophical organizations

I recently made a proposal to tighten up redundant categories in the philosophy department, but there seems to be some concerns about it. Any thoughts about this merge of "philosophical societies" and "philosophical organizations": Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2010_May_14#Category:Philosophical_societies? Be well, Greg Bard 16:50, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

GetEducated.com

Hi there.

There is some debate over whether GetEducated.com is notable or not. One user has repeatedly added a {{notable}} tah, and others have removed it.

Could some other people please look in on Talk:GetEducated.com and give their opinion, with a view to forming a consensus on whether or not it is notable, if the tag should be there or not?

Thanks,  Chzz  ►  12:44, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Proposal to blanket delete several organization articles

There is a proposal to blanket delete several articles of California State University auxiliary organizations. Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Agricultural_Foundation_of_California_State_University,_Fresno.Greg Bard 19:08, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

AfD for "Friends of" organization

This AfD needs people with subject knowledge. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friends of organization. Trilliumz (talk) 01:56, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Kiefer.Wolfowitz

Your input is sought at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Kiefer.Wolfowitz --Elen of the Roads (talk) 21:31, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Please comment at Movement for the Intellectually Disabled of Singapore's ongoing peer review!

Fellow Wikipedians, I humbly present my latest contribution to this project, an article about the Movement for the Intellectually Disabled of Singapore! MINDS turns 50 this year and getting their article to GA status would be a great way to appreciate their support of intellectually disabled Singaporeans. Could you support the quest to counter systemic bias on Wikipedia by commenting at the article's ongoing peer review? Hope you enjoy reviewing this short, but interesting, article, as much as I enjoyed writing it. Thanks! 谢谢！Terima kasih! நன்றி! --J.L.W.S. The Special One (talk) 06:55, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Seva Foundation

The article Seva Foundation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not Notable. See ‪Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies)‬

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GeorgeLouis (talk) 22:52, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Proposal for renaming Category:Legislatures of non-governmental organizations to Category:Legislatures of religious organizations

I have proposed renaming Category:Legislatures of non-governmental organizations to Category:Legislatures of religious organizations I am making this proposal because all the articles placed in this category are related to the legislative bodies of religious groups. I think members of this project may wish to way in over on its entry. --Devin Murphy (talk) 21:09, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

This category has been redirected to the new category Category:Governing assemblies of religious organizations. --Devin Murphy (talk) 19:22, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

WP:KIS label

Your WP:Keep It Simple label, {{User label WPOrganizations}} is in danger of being deleted. See (Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 February 6#Template:User_label.) If you still want it, you may wish to move it to project space, perhaps a redirect page Template:Label WPOrganizations or Template:Label WikiProject Organizations by placing {{db-move|Template:User label WPOrganizations|[[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 February 6#Template:User_label]]}} above the redirect. Also see {{user label}} for technical details. Feel free to review my planning page, User:PC-XT/KIS, and talk there if you have questions. PC-XT (talk) 01:27, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Help with Malaysian Palm Oil Board article

Hello. I am looking for editors to review a draft for the Malaysian Palm Oil Board (MPOB) article. The MPOB is a well established government agency in Malaysia responsible for overseeing the palm oil industry, but the current article about it is very short and needs references. I prepared this draft on behalf of the Malaysian Palm Oil Council (MPOC) which is a related organization, so I don't think it is appropriate for me to make the edits myself. I have left a request on the article's talk page that provides a little more information, and the draft is here: MPOB draft

Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks in advance. YellowOwl (talk) 23:55, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

My request has now been answered and an editor has reviewed the draft. YellowOwl (talk) 15:24, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Assistance updating Center for Copyright Information article

Hello, I've recently been working on behalf of the Center for Copyright Information (CCI) to improve their article here on Wikipedia. I've posted a request over on Talk:CCI detailing the changes I've made, and the complete draft of my proposed changes to my userspace here.

Given my paid COI in this matter, I'm hoping that some volunteer editors from WikiProject:Organizations would be willing to take a look and, if things look okay, move the article over into the mainspace. I've disabled categories in the draft on my userspace, so the article does get moved over, they'll need to be re-enabled.

If you have any questions or feedback, please let me know, either here, on Talk:CCI, or my Talk page. Cheers! ChrisPond (Talk · COI) 14:39, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello again, After originally posting here, I've been working with a few volunteer editors, especially User:Mjb, to improve the draft I proposed before it is ready to move into the mainspace. After some research and writing that took me several weeks, I believe that I've addressed all of mjb's feedback, but they've indicated that they're currently busy, and not able to review my changes at the moment. I'm thus reaching out here again, in the hope that someone might be able to take a look at the discussion at Talk:CCI, along with the current draft in my userspace and, if things all look okay, go ahead and move the draft over. Thanks! ChrisPond (Talk · COI) 15:45, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

This is now  Done. ChrisPond (Talk · COI) 13:52, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

{{Latin Union}}

Template:Latin Union (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) has been nominated for deletion -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 05:50, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Organization language templates up for deletion

See Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2013_August_26#Organisation_language_navboxes -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 06:03, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Several international organization templates are up for deletion

See Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2013_August_30 where these are mass-nominated -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 11:51, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Also Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 August 31

Also Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 August 29

Also Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 August 27

-- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 00:48, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up! bobrayner (talk) 13:30, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Requested move notification

Greetings! I have recently relisted a requested move discussion at Talk:Program for Appropriate Technology in Health#Requested move, regarding a page relating to this WikiProject. Discussion and opinions are invited. Thanks, Mdann52 (talk) 12:42, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

New draft for The Climate Reality Project

Hi there, I'm looking for editors to review a draft I've written for the Climate Reality Project. Since this WikiProject is listed on the article's Talk page, I'm hoping there are some editors here who'd be interested in helping me update and improve the article. I've written the new draft on behalf of, and with input from, the communications team at The Climate Reality Project and for that reason will not make any edits to the article myself.

There are three issues I'm hoping to address with my rewritten draft. First, the article currently uses mostly primary sources to support information and needs some restructuring and additional information to meet Wikipedia's standards. Second, The Climate Reality Project was formed from the joining of two predecessor organizations, The Climate Project and the Alliance for Climate Protection. I've suggested summarizing these articles and merging them in with the article about the current organization for simplicity. Third, I'd like to suggest renaming this article The Climate Reality Project, instead of Climate Reality Project as it is now, because "The" is part of the organization's name.

I've explained these issues in more detail on the Talk page and have linked to my draft from there. If you think this is something you can help with I'd really appreciate your help here. Thanks, 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 17:17, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

 Done The draft was reviewed and moved live, with redirects from the two predecessor organizations. 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 23:09, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Non-profit organizations

Following the recent cfd discussion, I'm going to try to work on diffusing the contents of Category:Non-profit organizations into subcategories. If anyone wants to help, please do. --Eliyak T·C 03:10, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Awesome. I've been trying to give everything (a) a subject (in Category:Organizations by subject), (b) a location, and (c) a year of establishment. --Lquilter (talk) 08:23, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Charities / Non-profit organizations /Non-governmental organizations / etc.

Here's an idea: As a first step, Category:Charities could be renamed to Category:Charitable organizations to avoid the UK legal implications. Sound good? --Eliyak T·C 21:46, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

I like the idea very much, if it really does get rid of the legal implications -- does anyone know for sure if it does? --Lquilter (talk) 19:19, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Editing/Review Request?

I was wondering if anyone from the project would be willing to review the article for the Alabama Cooperative Extension System. While, as a whole, I think it may be a good article, it was almost entirely written by the PR person for ACES, so it has some neutrality issues and often reads like promo material. While both the PR person and an editor from the Alabama project have done a little work from it, I think a more neutral party would also help and I'm not versed enough in organization article formats to feel comfortable doing major editing myself. AnmaFinotera (talk) 02:46, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Project template

I updated the {{WikiProject Organizations}} template for assessment. More work is required creating the related categories. There is now Category:WikiProject Organizations articles. (The template is related to that on Wikipedia:WikiProject Dance) Paul foord (talk) 09:49, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Center for Audit Quality - notable?

Not sure about this article, which is in the scope of this wikiproject. It was created by, and has mostly been edited by members of CAQ, and I'm not sure is actually notable enough for inclusion. Could someone else cast their eye over it? Fritzpoll (talk) 15:06, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Organizations: Articles of unclear notability

Hello,

there are currently 28 articles in the scope of this project which are tagged with notability concerns. I have listed them here. (Note: this listing is based on a database snapshot of 12 March 2008 and may be slightly outdated.)

I would encourage members of this project to have a look at these articles, and see whether independent sources can be added, whether the articles can be merged into an article of larger scope, or possibly be deleted. Any help in cleaning up this backlog is appreciated. For further information, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Notability.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the Notability project page or on my personal talk page. (I'm not watching this page however.) Thanks! --B. Wolterding (talk) 16:00, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Non-profit organization

Why do the Categories for this article only show when editing? Kathleen.wright5 02:45, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

someone left the </ref> off Paul foord (talk) 12:21, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Re:Organizations missing subject classification

I've provided subject classification for the articles that were in the above Category. The only ones I could'nt find a subject classification for are We Are Family Foundation and Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation. Please note that I am not a member of this WikiProject. Kathleen.wright5 12:41, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.

• The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
• The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
• A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.

Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:12, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Articles flagged for cleanup

Currently, 1106 articles are assigned to this project, of which 319, or 28.8%, are flagged for cleanup of some sort. (Data as of 14 July 2008.) Are you interested in finding out more? I am offering to generate cleanup to-do lists on a project or work group level. See User:B. Wolterding/Cleanup listings for details. More than 150 projects and work groups have already subscribed, and adding a subscription for yours is easy - just place a template on your project page.

If you want to respond to this canned message, please do so at my user talk page; I'm not watching this page. --B. Wolterding (talk) 16:23, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

UK charities - new external link templates

Hallo. I've just created two new templates, {{UK charity}} and {{Scottish charity}}. (Yes, I know the former is inaccurately named as it covers England and Wales: if I can work out the wiki technicalities I'll combine them into a single template at that name.) If you are creating or editing an article about a registered charity in England, Scotland or Wales, you might like to include this in the External Links - it leads to the record at the Charity Commission or Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator, which seems to me to be a valuable asset to the article, as evidence of its genuineness and a link to its accounts etc. They're similar to the templates for links to IMDB.

I've added them to all the "A"s under Category:Charities based in the United Kingdom, and will carry on extending their use to other pages eg Category:Charities based in England etc), gradually. AWB can't help much to semi-automate the process, as the registration number may or may not be included in the article already, sometimes isn't even visible on the organisation's own page (The Art Fund), and in one case so far I can find no trace at the Charity commission site (AfPP) so doubt whether it's a charity, and in another (Association of Colleges) so far have had to amend the article because it's an associated trust, not the named organisation, which is a charity. Interesting work!

If anyone can find me a similar online list for Northern Ireland charities, I'd be delighted - please let me know. PamD (talk) 11:28, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

ESA

I've set up a new task force page and a portal on the subject of ESA as part of the wikiproject Europe. I'm interested in knowing if I can somehow integrate the task force into this project as well. Also I am in need of a lot of help, so anyone interested in the subject or even if you just know how to set up the categories for a wikiproject or TF is more than welcomed. U5K0 (talk) 22:55, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Organizations

Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.

We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations.

A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 23:10, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Request for small org guidance

Could two or three WikiProjectians comment on this please? I am concerned that an article on a smallish org is not getting proper treatment due to the fact that the majority of recent contributors to article and talk (5 or 6 of them) are org members, including myself. The question is: given a 600-member org which is the oldest of its kind and has a 1200-issue journal and dozens of New York Times writeups, mostly in the 1920s and '30s, where should the line be drawn between "all policy-compliant content is welcome" and "arguably policy-compliant content, also considered cruftiferous by a couple of the org's members, is unwelcome"? For instance, how should I treat the concepts of lists of notable members, lists of notable and otherwise nonnotable officers, and otherwise reliable content published by loosely connected parties? I am interested in all ideas anyone has based on your dealings with similar situations; please comment here. Thanks in advance! JJB 04:03, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Organization events

I'm guessing that since the charitable organizations are within the scope of this WikiProject, the fund-raising events that they sponsor would be as well - is that correct? For these events, I can't seem to locate an infobox for charitable organization events. Does one exist which I'm overlooking; or has the project discussed these before and decided that they are not needed?

I can create one, not a problem; but I didn't want to run into issues with the project, so wanted to check before I created one. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 23:57, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Stephanie Kuhen

Remember the 1995 gang killing of Stephanie Kuhen in Los Angeles? A lot of media reports were written about this case, so I wonder if I could write an entire article about it. WhisperToMe (talk) 01:06, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

• Did Murder of Stephanie Kuhen WhisperToMe (talk) 10:52, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Spelling variations

Just a heads up that you might be interested in a discussion over various European organiz/s/ation stub types at Wikipedia:Stub types for renaming/deletion. Thanks - Her Pegship (tis herself) 00:26, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

G20 major economies

I just added this projects header to Talk:G20 major economies, where there's a discussion going on about what the article's name should be. Thanks. 68.167.252.47 (talk) 04:29, 15 November 2008 (UTC).

Categorisation

If you wish, please note Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Organizations/Taskforce-Categorization#Academies of different kinds. JoergenB (talk) 20:59, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Coordinators' working group

Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.

All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 06:13, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

A Social movement as an organisation?

Have just been improving People's Health Movement which is actually more of a social movement which has crystallised into a network. Can we think of adding social movement to the 'Scope' section of the project page? Any thoughts? prashanthns (talk) 19:36, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikimedia market research survey

There is a quantitative market research survey about to get underway, now being discussed at Meta Wikimedia. Personally, I consider the effort thus far to be scattered and amateur, and I am trying to lend a hand with re-design of the drafted plan. If there are any Wikipedians here with experience in the design and execution of population research studies, please come help me try to get this on a right and steady course. -- Thekohser 19:10, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

lay organization

Hello, in editing medical articles many of the self help and support groups call themselves 'lay organizations', I had started a draft of a description a while back User:Leevanjackson/layorganisation but was wondering if this is covered by another type ( i.e. merge into an existing article or to start one of its own, or any other thoughts? L∴V 10:36, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Org spam?

Please see Talk:Rivers_Without_Borders#Dangerously_close_to_org-spam. Various issues, doesn't quite read like an ad/brochure/SOAP but very close; maybe needs notability and advert tags.Skookum1 (talk) 13:45, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Ladies Aid

(cross-posted to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Gender Studies/Feminism Task Force)

We seem to have nothing at all about Ladies Aid or Ladies Aid Societies. I can find plenty online about individual Ladies Aid organizations, but almost nothing about such organizations in general: e.g. when did they first originate (some time in the first half of the 19th century, I believe), what was the sequence and timing of their spread geographically and among various religious denominations (and when were the first secular Ladies Aid societies formed), what roles did they fulfill at what periods (charity work in general, of course, but when did they first become involved in nursing work, for example), what would be the equivalent term for Ladies Aid in other languages where such organizations exist?

Not really my area, but a surprising lacuna. I suspect someone else will have a better idea than I will of where to start researching this. - Jmabel | Talk 06:46, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Clayoquot Sound Central Region Board

This and other articles authored by contributors from EcoTrust Canada re the Nuu-chah-nulth people and their governments and organizations are written from an AUTO/COI perspective and are very directory and brochure/p.r. oriented. I'm not sure what's in and what's out could someone please have a look; also look for West Coast of Vancouver Island Aquatic Management Board and other articles in Category:Nuu-chah-nulth and its subcats.Skookum1 (talk) 18:41, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Operation Day's Work

Does anyone have any experience with Operation Day's Work? It seems to be an international organization that is not so popular overseas (supported by non-English references), but the American branch seems to be a legitimate organization. Can someone familiar with NPOs or charities take a look at this article? Thanks, Pdcook (talk) 14:11, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

WP 1.0 bot announcement

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:44, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Pageview stats

After a recent request, I added WikiProject Organizations to the list of projects to compile monthly pageview stats for. The data is the same used by http://stats.grok.se/en/ but the program is different, and includes the aggregate views from all redirects to each page. The stats are at Wikipedia:WikiProject Organizations/Popular pages.

The page will be updated monthly with new data. The edits aren't marked as bot edits, so they will show up in watchlists. You can view more results, request a new project be added to the list, or request a configuration change for this project using the toolserver tool. If you have any comments or suggestions, please let me know. Thanks! Mr.Z-man 03:14, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Lists of directors

Is it generally considered a good idea to include a list of current officers and directors of an organization in the organization's article? DES ^(talk) 16:49, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

IOOF article for assessment

I have just added the project tag to Independent Order of Odd Fellows and provided a provisional assessment of class and importance. I would appreciate it if someone from the project could drop by and do a more thorough review. I think it meets at least C class and may meet some or all of the B class criteria. Cheers, AusTerrapin (talk) 20:36, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Organizations articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release

Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the Organizations articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:26, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Checking in to request feedback on main article

Fellow project members, I have joined the project because of my expertise in the area of organizational behavior, and to get feedback on the recent changes I have made to the Wikipedia article on organizations. Please add feedback on the talk page over there, or jump in and help me out with bringing that article up to higher quality! Ms. Citizen (talk) 21:03, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

International Parliament for Safety and Peace

There are often edit wars around the entry of the International Parliament for Safety and Peace. As a result it is currently semi-protected. Would it be possible for a member of this project to assess the importance of the article for WikiProject Organizations? Also is the "start" status still the correct status? Are there any other parameters that need to be set? Thank you for any assistance on the top of Talk:International Parliament for Safety and Peace or the entry itself! gidonb (talk) 16:57, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Inactive

Is this project active? I see mostly bot discussions, and little if any discussion... --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 22:12, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Two weeks, no reply - yes, this project is inactive. Marking it as such, --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 19:26, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

IMF

Please assist with moderating the IMF page. it should be about the IMF not about Dominique Strass-Kahn's affairs.Other dictionaries are better (talk) 18:52, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

I think a brief, neutral, and balanced discussion would be better. Removing any mention at all, despite extensive coverage in reliable sources, is no way to write a good article. However, you could shop around some more forums if you don't like the response you get here. bobrayner (talk) 21:06, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Safe Planet

• Safe Planet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

I think that this recently-created article falls within the scope of this wiki-project.

On the talk page, a user has raised concerns that it is overly dependent on primary sources; I think that is true. So, if anyone can help improve it, trim out anything inappropriate, etc. - please do. Best,  Chzz  ►  03:28, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

UNDG

Any expert on the UN/UN Development/UN Reform wanting to help out on the United Nations Development Group article? I've done quite a bit.Other dictionaries are better (talk) 09:33, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Re-write of Seacology

I know this project is only semi-active, but if anyone with experience writing about organizations could look over the newly re-written Seacology article, I would appreciate it. This is the first time I have written about an organization, so writing an entire article without academic sources was quite new to me. I also want to make sure the article sounds balanced and neutral. For now, I'm assessing its importance as "Mid" because of its global scope, but feel free to adjust that as necessary. – VisionHolder « talk » 12:59, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Summit Series Conference / Summit Series (conference)

About a week ago, I posted a request regarding the U.S. non-profit Summit Series—currently at Summit Series Conference—on the article's Talk page, suggesting it be moved to Summit Series (conference) and updated with a carefully researched new draft of my own writing. I also left a note with the last editor to take serious interest in the article, but this editor has been mostly offline, and hasn't responded.

Under other circumstances I would have long moved it into place, but the case is that my work here is on behalf of, and in collaboration with, Summit Series, so I am mindful of my potential COI. If anyone here would be willing to review the draft and weigh in, perhaps even follow through with the suggested changes, I'd be very appreciative. It's been awhile since I first proposed it, so after a few more days if there is no comment still, I might just go ahead and move it, assuming WP:SILENCE. Thanks for your consideration, WWB Too (talk) 16:11, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

For anyone finding this later, never mind! An uninvolved editor has answered my invitation to review and move the article. WWB Too (talk) 20:49, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Edits to the IMF Page

After reading through the current International Monetary Fund, I decided that the page portrays the IMF too narrowly and omits many of the main controversies. Not all of the perspectives on the IMF are included or even touched upon. The IMF is a very large, well-known, and powerful international organization. Understanding the IMF’s voting power and expanding information on the leadership election process is crucial for developing awareness and education about this organization. Let me know your thoughts! QuincyC (talk) 05:14, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:HighBeam

Wikipedia:HighBeam describes a limited opportunity for Wikipedia editors to have access to HighBeam Research.
—Wavelength (talk) 18:48, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Campaign To End Fistula

I plan on adding a section on the Obstetric fistula page regarding organizations that work on the issue. The Campaign to End Fistula is launched by the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) in 2003 to improve maternal health, which is one of the MDGs, by reducing the number of women affected by obstetric fistula. Since it is a very big campaign that works with many partner organizations and initiatives, I think it will make the Obstetric fistula page more comprehensive and to bring into attention that this disease is indeed a disease of poverty that requires the attention and efforts of trans-national organizations. Some sources that I plan to draw from are the UN Report on Fistula 2012, a report on the effectiveness of UNFPA's maternal health programs from the International Journal of Gynecology, and a report on the difficulties of getting people treated for fistula from the Lancet (see citations below).
Please let me know what suggestions you might have for my plan that would make a meaningful contribution to Wikipedia and the WikiProject group on Organizations. --Kayceeho (talk) 00:21, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Supporting Efforts to End Obstetric Fistula. Rep. UN Secretary General, 6 Aug. 2012. Web.
Fauveau, V., and F. Donnay. "Can The Process Indicators For Emergency Obstetric Care Assess The Progress Of Maternal Mortality Reduction Programs? An Examination Of UNFPA Projects 2000–2004." International Journal Of Gynecology & Obstetrics 93.3 (2006): 308-316. Academic Search Complete. Web. 20 Sept. 2012.
L Lewis Wall, Obstetric vesicovaginal fistula as an international public-health problem, The Lancet, Volume 368, Issue 9542, 30 September–6 October 2006, Pages 1201-1209, ISSN 0140-6736, 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69476-2. (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673606694762)

Institute for Cultural Diplomacy

I'd appreciate it if some editors with a little more experience with articles on organizations could take a look at the Institute for Cultural Diplomacy article. The article is long and pretty established but I spent some time looking through the history and am afraid that there are problems with primary sources, conflict of interest, reading like an advert. On the other hand, the page is long and well written and I don't know that anything there is incorrect. I've written up my concerns on the talk page. I'd really appreciate someone else taking a look. —mako๛ 01:23, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Delete decision per discussion closed on 16 June 2012. Article recreated 25 February 2013 by User:Xabratin.
SBaker43 (talk) 08:05, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Assessment guide – importance

The current guide for assessing articles at Wikipedia:WikiProject Organizations/Assessment#Importance scale is very generic and not at all conducive to assist users assessing the importance of organizations. __meco (talk) 17:58, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

I have added another column to the assessment table discussing topics and organizations appropriate for each Importance level. Examples are generally drawn from current Importance levels.

Please feel free to improve. I believe a world-wide, continental or regional, and national approach is appropriate for geographical relevance. I feel less confident about the topical discussions.

Could someone review current Top and High-level ratings; some articles appear to need a level change based on this revised Importance guidance.
SBaker43 (talk) 09:14, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Nonprofit groups around the world: New source

I found:

• Gravois, John. "The Lions of Lagos, the Rotarians of Rawalpindi." (Archive) Washington Monthly. July-August 2011.

WhisperToMe (talk) 05:39, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Help with IntercontinentalExchange article

the article IntercontinentalExchange had content removed by an editor who may be employed by the company. Are direct links to company services in section headings acceptable? Looks like marketing. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:IntercontinentalExchange oceanflynn 19:00, 12 April 2013 (UTC) 18:56, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Aristotelian Society

Hi, I've created and populated a category for the presidents of the Aristotelian Society, referring to the links in the list on that page as a 'source'. The list itself isn't sourced (but the Soc. website is in 'External Links', and /is/ the obvious source) and a lot of the articles are stubs that don't mention the Society, or don't source the statement that they were a president. This is bad. 8(

The list probably shouldn't be 'in the article', but however it is that peeps fix crazy long lists. :)

For consistency, style, etc.. every 'first statement' of a person's Presidency of the Society, in all of the articles, should be templated and cited to a Wayback Machine archived version of the Society's list, as a primary source for who was a president and when. As a fact known to a corporate author, it's a primary source, but it's the 'best' source in the context of every one of those articles. Every other mention of those people as an President anywhere, if they could be traced perfectly, would lead to the Society.

Ideal would be that the 'standard' inline citation text used a template, and had 'hidden' text that referred any future editor who edited there to some Talk page convo that said "Duh! This is an acceptable primary source! Here's why!"

Also, the whole series needs succession boxes.

Please note that doing all this is going to touch over 80 articles, including a lot of good ones like Bertram Russell.

I'm seeking other interested editors to work on this. I'm going to create the 'job' for myself of hounding this 'project' around through the world of Talk pages, but this seemed the 'topical' right place for the whole thing.

I'm going to be poking around other Projects (Biog, Philosophy) to draw more editors to work on bits and pieces of this. Revent (talk) 02:58, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks for telling us! To be honest, I think this is overcategorization. For positions within societies and so forth, we would typically just create a list, and link to the people who are presidents. It would be very, very rare for a position within an organization to be "defining". --Lquilter (talk) 13:17, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

You mean like there are category:Presidents of the Royal Society or category:Presidents of the Linnean Society of London or, Category:Presidents of the Geological Society of London or Category:Presidents of the Royal Geographical Society... oh hang on... this might be a good idea after all ;)

Also, to address the first point, there are other sources on the biographies that contain this information too (specific biographies, Oxford DNB, Obituaries, Who's Who, etc). Barney the barney barney (talk) 19:10, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Right, but a LOT of them are stubs with text directly included from DNB, with no other sources, and it appears from a quick glance to be the only notable thing about the older ones. When someone (eventually) rewrites them, it will be helpful to already have a source for their presidency, especially with dates and such as a lot of the DNB entries omit that. The 'Who's Who', and the newer ONDB, are behind a paywall.

TBH, I made the Cat as at least a first step toward cleanup of the Society article. If you look at it, the list is something like four times longer than the text, has over 80 members with WP articles, and the only real possible other cat from the stubs is usually "British Philosopher".

If there is a better way to do it, I'm all ears. I've never worked on fixing an article overwhelmed by a list. Revent (talk) 19:25, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

President of .... cats

Just glanced at it. There is a cat "Presidents of learned societies" with 22 subcats, that I just added the AS cat to. It also should have list articles directly in it, from the content. Take a look at Presidents_of_the_American_Chemical_Society, which with 9 members has a list article, category, template, etc. Revent (talk) 19:42, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

notability notice on new article, I'm new here

I just created an article for the Tourism Association of Koh Samui and right away it has a notability template on it. I'm not sure why such an organization would not be notable. Or what other categories or format it maybe should have. Anyone here have some tips on how I can satisfy whatever caused that template to be put on it? I'm new here, trying to do things right.AlfredShonfeld (talk) 12:55, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

"Mafia"

The usage of Mafia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) is under discussion, see talk: Sicilian Mafia -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 02:25, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

RfC regarding Ludwig von Mises Institute

See: Talk:Ludwig von Mises Institute#RfC: Should "Views espoused by founders & organization scholars" be in the article? – S. Rich (talk) 16:34, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Is anyone here? (Wikipedia:WikiProject_Organizations#Article Alerts )

Just wondering since I see a lot of pages belonging to this wikiproject which are up for "discussion". XOttawahitech (talk) 14:16, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Another editor has created Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. I think the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance is probably an important academic medical group, but I can't find references to demonstrate notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:38, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

@Eastmain: Would you please elaborate: the article (wp:AfC) which you linked here has 19 references. Thanks in advance, XOttawahitech (talk) 14:22, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Archived some threads

I've archived some inactive threads to subsections which were notifications about discussions that have since been closed. — Cirt (talk) 06:42, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Popular pages tool update

As of January, the popular pages tool has moved from the Toolserver to Wikimedia Tool Labs. The code has changed significantly from the Toolserver version, but users should notice few differences. Please take a moment to look over your project's list for any anomalies, such as pages that you expect to see that are missing or pages that seem to have more views than expected. Note that unlike other tools, this tool aggregates all views from redirects, which means it will typically have higher numbers. (For January 2014 specifically, 35 hours of data is missing from the WMF data, which was approximated from other dates. For most articles, this should yield a more accurate number. However, a few articles, like ones featured on the Main Page, may be off).

Web tools, to replace the ones at tools:~alexz/pop, will become available over the next few weeks at toollabs:popularpages. All of the historical data (back to July 2009 for some projects) has been copied over. The tool to view historical data is currently partially available (assessment data and a few projects may not be available at the moment). The tool to add new projects to the bot's list is also available now (editing the configuration of current projects coming soon). Unlike the previous tool, all changes will be effective immediately. OAuth is used to authenticate users, allowing only regular users to make changes to prevent abuse. A visible history of configuration additions and changes is coming soon. Once tools become fully available, their toolserver versions will redirect to Labs.

If you have any questions, want to report any bugs, or there are any features you would like to see that aren't currently available on the Toolserver tools, see the updated FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Mr.Z-bot (talk) (for Mr.Z-man) 05:20, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Honor-stub

Template:Honor-stub has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. 70.50.151.11 (talk) 05:43, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Neutral notice of RfC on Investigative Project on Terrorism

Is here:Talk:Investigative_Project_on_Terrorism#RFC:_Does_the_use_of_the_Islamophobia_template_in_this_article_violate_wikipedias_policy_on_NPOV.3F.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 23:06, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Deletion discussion for Wiki Education Foundation

1. Wiki Education Foundation
2. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiki Education Foundation

There is a deletion discussion ongoing for article Wiki Education Foundation.

Discussion page is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiki Education Foundation.

— Cirt (talk) 18:29, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Request for help at Talk:Jehovah's Witnesses

There is a discussions at Talk:Jehovah's Witnesses#Founder regarding whether Russell, the founder of the groups which later incorporated and changed names to the JW name, can reasonably be called the founder of the JWs as well, and, I suppose, if he can, whether there should be some sort of additional text to the effect of his being the founder of the group which later became the JWs. I have a feeling the people here might be among the better editors to respond to this issue of name change and subsequent formal founding of a legal business. John Carter (talk) 21:33, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:List_of_organizations_opposing_homelessness#Requested move

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List_of_organizations_opposing_homelessness#Requested move. Thanks. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 04:04, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Pride 2014

You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride 2014, a campaign to create and improve LGBT-related content at Wikipedia and its sister projects. The campaign will take place throughout the month of June, culminating with a multinational edit-a-thon on June 21. Meetups are being held in some cities, or you can participate remotely. All constructive edits are welcome in order to contribute to Wikipedia's mission of providing quality, accurate information. Articles related to LGBT organizations may be of particular interest. You can also upload LGBT-related images by participating in Wikimedia Commons' LGBT-related photo challenge. You are encouraged to share the results of your work here. Happy editing! --Another Believer _(Talk) 19:15, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Leaflet For Wikiproject Organizations At Wikimania 2014

Hi all,

My name is Adi Khajuria and I am helping out with Wikimania 2014 in London.

One of our initiatives is to create leaflets to increase the discoverability of various wikimedia projects, and showcase the breadth of activity within wikimedia. Any kind of project can have a physical paper leaflet designed - for free - as a tool to help recruit new contributors. These leaflets will be printed at Wikimania 2014, and the designs can be re-used in the future at other events and locations.

This is particularly aimed at highlighting less discoverable but successful projects, e.g:

• Active Wikiprojects: Wikiproject Medicine, WikiProject Video Games, Wikiproject Film

• Tech projects/Tools, which may be looking for either users or developers.

• Less known major projects: Wikinews, Wikidata, Wikivoyage, etc.

• Wiki Loves Parliaments, Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiki Loves ____

• Wikimedia thematic organisations, Wikiwomen’s Collaborative, The Signpost

For more information or to sign up for one for your project, go to:
Project leaflets
Adikhajuria (talk) 10:59, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Kleargear AFD deletion discussion notice

1. Kleargear
2. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kleargear (2nd nomination)

Discussion about whether or not to delete article for Kleargear, discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kleargear (2nd nomination). — Cirt (talk) 20:32, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Talk:European Council on Foreign Relations

Hello. You might be interested in replying to my question about whether the 'advertisement' tag on the European Council on Foreign Relations's page should be removed or not. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 11:21, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

Requested review of proposed revision for Heritage Action

Hi, I'm looking for editors to review a proposed article revision I have prepared for the Heritage Action article. I would like to first acknowledge my conflict of interest with this topic as I have prepared the revision on the organization's behalf. Due to my relationship with the subject, I am requesting that editors review the draft I have prepared and provide feedback so I can improve my draft.

I've left a more detailed message at Talk:Heritage Action but have yet to receive a response from editors there. I hope that editors interested in this WikiProject might be interested in helping me improve this article. Thanks! Morzabeth (talk) 22:05, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

European Sleep Apnea Database deletion discussion

• European Sleep Apnea Database

European Sleep Apnea Database is undergoing a deletion discussion, AFD page at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Sleep Apnea Database. — Cirt (talk) 01:15, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Autism Research Institute

Proposal to cut and paste rewrite from Talk:Autism Research Institute/draft into blanked article. I think needed changes can be made after the cut and paste and that the draft is acceptable improvement of existing article. - - MrBill3 (talk) 18:31, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

New Article

Hi, can someone check out my new article? Its about a spanish organisation called Fundación Aladina. Thanks.--FMateos (talk) 08:37, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Link for convenience: Fundación Aladina —PC-XT+ 03:10, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Comment on the WikiProject X proposal

Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

All-China Women's Federation

Hello WikiProject Organizations members. Shelby McPherson nominated the article All-China Women's Federation here, but she is inactive as you see here. Could anyone step in and make this article GA? Cheers! Brandon (MrWooHoo) • Talk to Brandon! 21:59, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

American Principles Project

The article American Principles Project (about the conservative 501c non-profit group founded by Professor Robert Geroge of Princton University) needs some attn from editors interested in the subject. Article has recently had over 8000bytes of text removed and tagged for notability. Appears to be a notable org (gets 128 hits in google news in 0.22 seconds [1], but I don't have the time to put the work into article it needs.--BoboMeowCat (talk) 15:55, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Policy on listing presidents and Board members?

I remember reading a WP policy advising against adding lists of non-notable organizational senior management and Board members. But I can't seem to find it now. Anyone here know what I'm talking about? I was going to delete such a list at College of DuPage, but wanted to cite a reason. Cheers for the help, Dkriegls (talk to me!) 07:33, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject X is live!

Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

ClearPoint Credit Counseling Solutions

I'm looking for editors with availability to take on the project of creating a page for this nonprofit organization. I work in marketing for the company, but have no interest in creating anything promotional or spammy, as appears to have been the case of the page version deleted in 2009. ClearPoint has earned notability in recent years via extensive media coverage and a high profile merger in the industry. I've submitted a request along with many sources [[2]]. TeeBright (talk) 21:43, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Funding and compensation

I recommend adding a "Funding and compensation" section to each article to show who funds the organization and how much the executive officers are paid. If the organization is based in the United States the website GuideStar can be used to pull the organizations IRS 990 Tax forms. The 990 forms show the organization's total revenue, executive compensation, and where they spend their money. Waters.Justin (talk) 21:07, 5 February 2015 (UTC) }}

Egyptian Center for Economic and Social Rights (ECESR)

I've done some work (re)establishing an ECESR stub article and would like to invite editors with an interest in such topics to help expand upon it. --Kevjonesin (talk) 05:57, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

List of designated terrorist organizations listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for List of designated terrorist organizations to be moved to List of designated terrorist groups. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 18:06, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

National Board of Study and Aerospace Research listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for National Board of Study and Aerospace Research to be moved to ONERA. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 22:49, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Tamid Group listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Tamid Group to be moved to TAMID Group. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 23:16, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Haus der Religionen listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Haus der Religionen to be moved to House of Religions. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 23:23, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Americans for Prosperity#one of the most influential

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Americans for Prosperity#one of the most influential. Thanks. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 18:26, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Non-governmental federation

I just created a new article, non-governmental federation, as I saw a need for it at Federation (disambiguation). I have started it as two lists, one of types of federation (that have articles) and one for actual federations. It probably omits many notable federations that could be listed, and the two-list format is probably not ideal, so please be bold and jump in to improve non-governmental federation . --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 10:42, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Please add it to your watchlist, and assess it's quality for your wikiproject at Talk:Non-governmental federation. I think it is Start class. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 11:03, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

JC's Girls

I have started an FAC for the article about JC's Girls, a Christian organization. The reviewers who have contributed to the FAC so far seem sharply divided. Any constructive contributions would be greatly appreciated. Neelix (talk) 19:19, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Category:Organizations based in the Netherlands

Category:Organizations based in the Netherlands, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for merging to Category:Organisations based in the Netherlands. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 20:18, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Article alerts

This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 09:31, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of NewsBank for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NewsBank is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NewsBank until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Cirt (talk) 08:24, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Merge this WikiProject with Wikipedia:WikiProject Companies

I was looking for some guidance on notability of non-profit organizations and came across this WikiProject. It seems activity on this project is very limited and many ends are left loose (for example Wikipedia:WikiProject Organizations/Categorization). Why not merge with Wikipedia:WikiProject Companies? Gpeja (talk) 22:11, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Please leave your comments at WikiProject Companies Portal. Gpeja (talk) 17:26, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Request for comment notice: $44M of $140M raised by Americans for Prosperity in 2012 election from Koch-related funds

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Americans for Prosperity#Request for comment: .2444M of .24140M raised by Americans for Prosperity in 2012 election cycle from Koch-related funds. Please contribute to the request for comment. Thanks. Hugh (talk) 17:15, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

This is an update to the request for comment and a request for wider participation. The RfC question asks for community feedback on a one-sentence addition to the funding section of a politically active non-profit organization. The main source is a pair of reports in The Washington Post, supported by FactCheck.org and the National Journal. The proposed content summarizes a key finding of investigative journalism. The discussion of the RfC centers on the due weight of investigative journalism into the sources of funding of not-for-profit organizations that are not legally required to disclose their funders. Attention from uninvolved editors with some experience with articles on non-profit organizations is respectfully requested. Generous excerpts from the sources are provided in the statement of the RfC question for your convenience. Please help with this request for comment. Thank you in advance for your time and attention. Hugh (talk) 16:30, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

This request for comment will most likely close Thursday 6 August 2015. This is an update and a request for wider participation. Issues in the appropriate use of funding information and investigative journalism results remain in the discussion. Your comments are needed. Please help with this important request for comment. Thank you in advance for your time and attention. Hugh (talk) 15:28, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

New external link template for US nonprofits

A new external link template, Template:ProPublicaNonprofitExplorer, may be used to generate an external link, from the "External links" section of a Wikipedia article on a United States tax-exempt organization, to the Internal Revenue Service Form 990s ("Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax"), as archived in the Nonprofit Explorer project of ProPublica. In most cases, the template may simply be invoked with the Employer Identification Number of the organization. For example, on page American National Red Cross

== External links ==
* {{ProPublicaNonprofitExplorer|530196605}}

..generates:

External links

• "American National Red Cross Internal Revenue Service filings". ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer.

Thank you. Hugh (talk) 20:15, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Category:Knights of Columbus people

Category:Knights of Columbus people, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for renaming to Category:Supreme Knights of the Knights of Columbus. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:11, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Category:Members of the International Order of Twelve Knights and Daughters of Tabor

Category:Members of the International Order of Twelve Knights and Daughters of Tabor, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:16, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Category:Members of the Orange Order

Category:Members of the Orange Order, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for renaming to Category:Grand Masters of the Orange Order. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:18, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Category:Bahamian American Freemasons

Category:Bahamian American Freemasons, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:20, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

}}subst:cfd-notify|Category:Monarchs who were Freemasons|2015 October 24|Monarchs who were Freemasons|wikiproject=yes|action=listifying}} RevelationDirect (talk) 01:28, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Category:Monarchs who were Freemasons

Category:Monarchs who were Freemasons, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for listifying. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:29, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Created article - Moveable Feast

I've created a new article on the Baltimore based nonprofit that delivers food to ill people -- Moveable Feast.

Please feel free to help out or collaborate on improvements, at Talk:Moveable Feast.

Thank you,

— Cirt (talk) 03:25, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Category: United Way Worldwide

United Way Worldwide, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for monitoring. The organization’s page has been edited by one person who seems to be editorializing. Neilp.seattle (talk) 15:23, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

AAPC (healthcare)

Can I have more eyes over at the AAPC (healthcare) article, please? There are a team of users using the minor edit tag to make non-minor changes. I've not made any talk page notifications yet, as I'm not sure what to post? Thanks in advance Little pob (talk) 11:52, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Used twinkle to issue single issue notices for the minor checkbox and for edit summaries. Editor behavior commonalities and single purpose focus suggest possible socking. Hugh (talk) 18:26, 24 December 2015 (UTC) Hi. I filed a sock puppet investigation request WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Riz-vs-ric. Hugh (talk) 21:12, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

RfC announce: Religion in infoboxes

There is an RfC at Template talk:Infobox#RfC: Religion in infoboxes concerning what should be allowed in the religion entry in infoboxes. Please join the discussion and help us to arrive at a consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 17:38, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Category:Fellow Members of the SME has been nominated for discussion

Category:Fellow Members of the SME, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 03:30, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Category:Organizations named after people has been nominated for discussion

Category:Organizations named after people, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:02, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Request re: Smile Train

Hi, I'm Shari and I'm here on behalf of my employer, Smile Train. I've proposed some updates for the Smile Train article, which are outlined at Talk:Smile Train.

I've added two specific requests for the "Partnerships and supporters" and "Recognition" sections. The first request is to add details of a major supporter and a recent partnership not currently included. The second request is to add information about a documentary Smile Train was involved with and the National Training Simulation Association's recognition of the organization's Virtual Surgery Simulator.

I know that editing articles directly is strongly discouraged, given my disclosed COI. Is there someone who is able to respond to these two requests? Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! -SM at Smile Train (talk) 20:08, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Completed See talk page for specific updates. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:53, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Organization v. Organisations

Since February, 2007 we have had a discussion (located here: I.), which did not quite end as it just ceased without verification that the ending statement were to be held true or not. That statement by [ Lquilter ] read:

"For the purposes of this WikiProject and all related articles, and categories, we will use the organization standard. Also, all categories shall be lower-case organization."

American spelling accepts only -ize endings in most cases, such as organize, recognize, and realize. British usage accepts both -ize and the more French-looking -ise (organise, recognise, realise). However, the -ize spelling is now rarely used in the UK in the mass media and newspapers, and is hence often incorrectly regarded as an Americanism, despite being preferred by some authoritative British sources, including Fowler's Modern English Usage and the Oxford English Dictionary, which until recently did not list the -ise form of many individual words, even as an alternative. Indeed, it firmly deprecates this usage, stating, "The suffix, whatever the element to which it is added, is in its origin the Greek... (or) Latin -izare; and, as the pronunciation is also with z, there is no reason why in English the special French spelling in -iser should be followed, in opposition to that which is at once etymological and phonetic."

"Worldwide, -ize endings prevail in scientific writing and are commonly used by many international organizations."

Well if it were to in be effect, it emphatically was not as shown in [Category:Organizations by country], where there is about a 60-40 split that favors the -sa. This is extremely problematic as its derivatives are also mismatched. A single country or culture could have categories of both. It is extremely difficult to create new categories without there being a decisive factor involved, and/or a rubric if you will in place to avoid this from continuing to happen.

In terms of categorization, if it is generic such as [Category:Organizations based in Haiti]; it should be spelled pertaining to what the census had agreed upon, be it "organization" or "organisation." However, if the category is not a generic one and is named after an article in which the establishment spells it one of those ways, whichever way it chooses should be enforced such as "The Such-and-Such Organisation;" if there was an existing category pertaining to exactly that.

Let this be the lasting debate, to trump all others if you will. This is a mess, and it needs some serious attention and reform that may inevitably lead to massive category moves and redirects but all for the sake of WP:CONSISTENCY. Thanks to all whom it concern. Savvyjack23 (talk) 19:18, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

I am fully in support of a single, consistent solution. I am an American and so I naturally favor (or favour) the -ize spelling, but for the sake of consistency I have created my fair share of -ise categories in the Brazil category tree. Brazilians tend towards American spelling, but there is no official standard in the country that I am aware of. Some early Wikipedia editor created the first category (prior to 2006) and everything has followed suit since then. If it were agreed upon here, I would request that the Brazilian categories be renamed, but in the meanwhile I will continue to follow the pattern that was already established. giso6150 (talk) 23:12, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Move discussion for food charity nonprofit

Please see Talk:Moveable_Feast_(organization)#Requested_move_10_April_2016.

Thank you,

— Cirt (talk) 20:25, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Requests for Smile Train article

Hello, Shari here again with another request to update the article about my employer, Smile Train. I've proposed some updates at Talk:Smile Train.

The first request is about co-founder Brian Mullaney's departure from the organization in 2010. The second request proposes a slightly trimmed and less contentious re-wording of the relationship between Smile Train and Operation Smile, and puts the content in chronological order.

I know that editing articles directly is discouraged, given my conflict of interest. Is there someone who is willing to respond to these two requests? Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks for your consideration! SM at Smile Train (talk) 15:52, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Shari here: I am still looking for help with this request. The first request has been completed but the second request and an additional request to remove a “citation needed” tag and to add a celebrity supporter are still outstanding. Is anyone available to help? Thanks for any assistance in advance. 19:32, 31 May 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SM at Smile Train (talk • contribs)

Auto-assessment of article classes

Following a recent discussion at WP:VPR, there is consensus for an opt-in bot task that automatically assesses the class of articles based on classes listed for other project templates on the same page. In other words, if WikiProject A has evaluated an article to be C-class and WikiProject B hasn't evaluated the article at all, such a bot task would automatically evaluate the article as C-class for WikiProject B.

If you think auto-assessment might benefit this project, consider discussing it with other members here. For more information or to request an auto-assessment run, please visit User:BU RoBOT/autoassess. This is a one-time message to alert projects with over 1,000 unassessed articles to this possibility. ~ Rob^Talk 01:19, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Rotary Clubs in the United States has been nominated for discussion

Category:Rotary Clubs in the United States, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:38, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Looking for feedback on TechSoup Global edits

Hello, I am improving the TechSoup Global page. It has had a cleanup tag on it since 2015 and I am addressing the issues cited. I have done some work on it already, and I would appreciate any guidance or help with the editing from more experienced editors.Bajeckabean (talk) 18:09, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Rotary Foundation fellows has been nominated for discussion

Category:Rotary Foundation fellows, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:38, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Help with Autism Speaks

Hi there! I'm looking for any editors who would be willing to review some new material to add to the Autism Speaks article. Since I'm working on behalf of the two organization founders, Bob and Suzanne Wright, I won't make any edits myself and have instead made a request on the Talk page to update the Awareness section of the article.

As it stands, the current page is missing some details about the level of involvement Suzanne has had in the organization, particularly its awareness efforts. My proposal is to add a few sentences to clarify that role. I hope someone here can take a look! Thanks in advance, 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 21:10, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

 Done This is complete. 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 17:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Wings of Hope (charity)

Would someone from WP:ORGZ mind taking a look at Wings of Hope (charity) and assessing it? Also, the sourcing seems a bit weak, so I'm not sure if it satisfies WP:ORG. Thanks in advance. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:26, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Category:Members of The Planetary Society has been nominated for discussion

Category:Members of The Planetary Society, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:33, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

The Fairness Project (nonprofit organization)

Hello! I'm looking for any editors who would be willing to create an entry for The Fairness Project -- more information on the organization is listed in Wikipedia's Requested Articles section: [3]

Since I'm a consultant to the organization, I won't create the page, but would really appreciate it if an independent editor would take a look. Thanks in advance! Dhudson427 (talk) 00:06, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Proposed wiki parameter for infobox organization

I have proposed adding a new |wiki= parameter for {{infobox organization}} at Template talk:Infobox organization § Proposed wiki parameter. This would follow the Website field and would display Wiki followed by the wiki URL. This new field should be clearer to readers and would also make the wiki URL machine searchable. Does anyone have any comments? Best wishes. RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 09:47, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

International Justice Mission request

Hi, I'm Sterling, of International Justice Mission. Are there editors interested in international human rights organizations who can review an edit request to improve the International Justice Mission article? My proposal attempts to add information on International Justice Mission's organizational structure and budget breakdown. I have a conflict of interest so I have posted an edit request on the article's Talk page and have sought editor involvement here, and other WikiProjects. Best, SE at Int'l Justice Mission (talk) 19:37, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Question about project scope

Hi, I've been working to create and improve the article Domestic violence in same-sex relationships and although this article is not specifically about an organization, it does include a list of organizations that work with victims of domestic violence in same-sex relationships. I was wondering if this would fall under the scope of your project, if you have any suggestions for how to improve the "Organizations" subsection, or if you have further organizations you recommend I add to the article. All the best. Kmwebber (talk) 20:42, 26 October 2016 (UTC)Kmwebber

Ideology parameter in infobox

I suggested to add an ideology parameter to the infobox here. It was said that this would need consensus.--Zoupan 01:06, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Gülen movement uses quite a few nonexistent parameters, one of them being ideology. Hairy Dude (talk) 01:51, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

I think this is a good idea. Especially for political advocacy organisations. Ebelular (talk) 14:39, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

2016 Community Wishlist Survey Proposal to Revive Popular Pages

Greetings WikiProject Organizations/Archive 4 Members!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about a technical proposal to revive your Popular Pages list in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

• Fix and improve Mr.Z-bot's popular pages report

If the above proposal gets in the Top 10 based on the votes, there is a high likelihood of this bot being restored so your project will again see monthly updates of popular pages.

Further, there are over 260 proposals in all to review and vote for, across many aspects of wikis.

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 18:05, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

New Wikileaking organization

Check out the new article on MormonWikiLeaks.

Sagecandor (talk) 05:40, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Editing Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus

The article, Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus, needs some cleanup. --George Ho (talk) 19:51, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

MEMRI

Hello.

I'm here to request assistance from the community in reviewing recommendations I made on the Middle East Media Research Institute talk page. My message contained a new draft for the "Projects" section of the article for editors to implement if they'd like. There's been one response to it, but I'd like some other points of view. I work for the organization and know that I should not make any changes myself. Thank you. R at MEMRI (talk) 14:17, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Notice to participants at this page about adminship

Many participants here create a lot of content, may have to evaluate whether or not a subject is notable, decide if content complies with BLP policy, and much more. Well, these are just some of the skills considered at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship.

So, please consider taking a look at and watchlisting this page:

• Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Optional RfA candidate poll

You could be very helpful in evaluating potential candidates, and even finding out if you would be a suitable RfA candidate.

Many thanks and best wishes,

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:11, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers

Template:Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers has been nominated for merging with Template:IEEE councils. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. --Jax 0677 (talk) 19:11, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Assata's Daughters Review

I have made substantial edits to the wiki article for the organization Assata's Daughters. Could somebody look at my edits and provide me with some feedback - what I could add, what does not fit, etc. Thanks! Nick M-PS489 (talk) 19:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Request for comment: International Justice Mission criticism

Hi, there is a Request for comment at International Justice Mission that participants of WikiProject Organizations might find of interest. The question is: Should criticism of International Justice Mission stand in the Criticism section, or should it be incorporated throughout the article where appropriate? Thank you for considering! Best, SE at Int'l Justice Mission (talk) 21:26, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Help requested for CTIA – The Wireless Association article

Resolved

Over the past few months, I've been working on a proposed draft for the CTIA – The Wireless Association article to expand on information about the organization's history, leadership, advocacy efforts, and other activities. I'm hoping to find a neutral editor who can copy over the proposed draft as appropriate. You can read more details at this edit request on the article's talk page. Thank you! Inkian Jason (talk) 19:44, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

I am still looking for assistance if a project member is available to help. Another editor said the proposed text was good overall but has yet to implement any content to the article. Thanks. Inkian Jason (talk) 16:53, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

This edit request has been answered. Inkian Jason (talk) 18:43, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Hong Kong Institute of Surveyors

Was wondering if someone from this WikiProject would mind taking a look at Hong Kong Institute of Surveyors and assessing it. The article was added via WP:AFC, but it's sourcing is not very strong and consists of primary sources and what look like trivial mentions. There also appear to be edits being made by people connected to the the organization in some way. Thanks in advance. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:32, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Tides (organization) edits

Hello, are any editors with WikiProject Organizations interested in improving Tides (organization)? Please see this request for edits if so. (Please note that I have a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, as I work for Tides. Rather than direct edit, I posted my suggestions at the discussion page.) The edits I proposed update the article and fix inaccuracies in the intro and infobox. Thank you, RD at Tides (talk) 19:20, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Upcoming "420 collaboration"

You are invited to participate in the upcoming "420 collaboration", which is being held from Saturday, April 15 to Sunday, April 30, and especially on April 20, 2017! The purpose of the collaboration, which is being organized by WikiProject Cannabis, is to create and improve cannabis-related content at Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects in a variety of fields, including: culture, health, hemp, history, medicine, politics, and religion. WikiProject Organizations participants may be particularly interested in the following category: Category:Cannabis organizations. For more information about this campaign, and to learn how you can help improve Wikipedia, please visit the "420 collaboration" page.

---Another Believer _(Talk) 20:43, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Can an editor please look at my proposed changes to this company page? The Association of Independent Tour Operators

I work for AITO and have suggested some updates to this page , here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Association_of_Independent_Tour_Operators

The current version is not very good quality and includes links to irrelevant websites. It would be much appreciated if someone could take a look! I have referenced the content.

Many thanks, Kyomi — Preceding unsigned comment added by WP-AITO (talk • contribs) 15:16, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Danza Organica

Would someone from this WikiProject mind taking a look at Danza Organica and assessing it? The article is still relatively new and appears to have been created as part of Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Emerson College/African American Theatre and Culture (Fall 2016). Lots of articles created by students participating in these class projects usually never pass through AfC and end up being tagged, like this one has, for all kinds of issues. Any feedback, particularly on its notability, would be appreciated. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:19, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

May 2017 on Women in Red

		Welcome to Women in Red's May 2017 worldwide online editathons. Participation is welcome in any language.
		"Organizations" "Sports" "Pacific islanders"

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Ipigott (talk) 11:05, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Please comment at Template talk:Infobox official post

Hello all. If you find the time, please consider commenting here as to whether there should be an |acting = yes parameter for acting officials. Thanks.--Nevé–selbert 20:28, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Popular pages report

We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month, Community Tech bot will post at Wikipedia:WikiProject Organizations/Archive 4/Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of WikiProject Organizations.

We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:

• The pageview data includes both desktop and mobile data.
• The report will include a link to the pageviews tool for each article, to dig deeper into any surprises or anomalies.
• The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).

We're grateful to Mr.Z-man for his original Mr.Z-bot, and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of WikiProject Organizations, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.

Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

COI request

Hello. There is an edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest at Talk:Tides (organization)#Updates for introduction and infobox that could use a review. There is substantial information that the editor wants implemented. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 23:55, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Where can I request for an article?

Another project I'm a part of, Wikipedia:WikiProject_Medicine, has a page for requested articles. I cannot make the article myself because there would be a conflict of interest (I am an officer of the aforementioned organisation,) but I wanted to know both if it is okay for me to request such an article provided that I do not edit it (perhaps barring grammatical errors, unless that is also disallowed) and if there are other requests for organisation articles which I may be able to fulfil, due to a lack of conflict of interest. --a u t a c o i d ^(stalk) 05:06, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Criticism at International Justice Mission

Hi, I'm Sterling, of International Justice Mission. I've been part of a discussion on the how to best handle the article's Criticism section. Back in May, I posted a request for comment, and the consensus was for details from Criticism to be incorporated throughout the article. I then posted this edit request to continue to conversation. But since then, there has not been much movement toward incorporating criticism throughout the article, nor has anyone come forward with another solution. Advice from participants of WikiProject Organizations is greatly appreciated. Best, SE at Int'l Justice Mission (talk) 14:28, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Net assets and compensation of executive officers

More than once, I've been criticized for posting the net assets and the salary of executive officers on an article about an organization. You can get this from the organization's IRS Form 990 using GuideStar. Here is an example of how even posting this information in the article's Talk page resulted in an editor calling me a troll. Is posting this information useful and relevant to organizations?Talk:Southern_Poverty_Law_Center#Net_assets_and_compensation_of_executive_officers. Waters.Justin (talk) 17:45, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

I recommend that you read WP:No original research and WP:BLPPRIMARY. — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 17:53, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Calling out criminals who worked for organizations on the org page

Hi there. Not sure if this is the right place but I'm involved in a content dispute on the page State Rail Authority where an editors keeps adding in a crime section because one employee raped some people. I don't believe this has any place on the organization page as it implies it is in someway connected to the organization. see this edit for example. Canterbury Tail talk 13:33, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Good article review: Baltimore Urban Debate League

Baltimore Urban Debate League, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. DMacks (talk) 13:48, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Final International Justice Mission request

Hi, as some of you might have seen, I've been working for months with Wikipedians to incorporate detail from the Criticism section of International Justice Mission throughout the article. I have just one final request, which you can view here. Any help is greatly appreciated. Best, SE at Int'l Justice Mission (talk) 14:26, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation links on pages tagged by this wikiproject

Wikipedia has many thousands of wikilinks which point to disambiguation pages. It would be useful to readers if these links directed them to the specific pages of interest, rather than making them search through a list. Members of WikiProject Disambiguation have been working on this and the total number is now below 20,000 for the first time. Some of these links require specialist knowledge of the topics concerned and therefore it would be great if you could help in your area of expertise.

A list of the relevant links on pages which fall within the remit of this wikiproject can be found at http://69.142.160.183/~dispenser/cgi-bin/topic_points.py?banner=WikiProject_Organizations

Please take a few minutes to help make these more useful to our readers.— Rod ^talk 17:48, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Eyes needed...

...on current editing on Aryan Brotherhood. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:37, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Are statements by the NRA WP:RS for views/opinions of the NRA

I've started a WP:RSN discussion on the topic here [[4]] Springee (talk) 01:44, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

RfC: Should material stating the NRA operates gun safety and training programs be included in the NRA article?

Should material stating the NRA operates gun safety and training programs be included in the NRA article [[5]]? Springee (talk) 01:52, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Talk:American Guard

Please comment on content that has been called into question.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 14:34, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes

International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. AIRcorn (talk) 10:54, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

WikiProject collaboration notice from the Portals WikiProject

The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.

Portals are being redesigned.

The new design features are being applied to existing portals.

At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template {{Transclude lead excerpt}}.

The discussion about this can be found here.

Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.

Background

On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.

There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.

So far, 84 editors have joined.

If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.

If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.

Thank you.    — The Transhumanist   11:00, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

All Hands Volunteers listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for All Hands Volunteers to be moved to All Hands And Hearts - Smart Response. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 13:02, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Potential article we need International Federation for Animal Health (IFAH)

Don't really know much about it yet. We have a lot of animal welfare group articles and this sounds like either a major one, or cooperative federation of major ones (though it could be a "nobody" group with a grandiose name).  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  16:57, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

RfC on the treatment of organizational colors

FYI

 – Pointer to relevant discussion elsewhere.

Please see Talk:Milwaukee Bucks#RfC for team colors

This is really beyond the Milwaukee Bucks or even sports in particular, and relevant to coverage of organizations and their house styles generally. This touches on all of: MOS:CAPS, MOS:TM, WP:NOR, WP:NPOV, and WP:NOT#INDISCRIMINATE, in various aspects (see the more detailed discussion below the !vote section).
 — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  19:20, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Saylor Academy

Greetings! I am seeking editors to review a new draft of Saylor Academy in my user space and at Talk:Saylor_Academy#New_draft_available. Editors at this WikiProject might be interested because Saylor Academy is a non-profit organization offering free and open online courses. I will not be making edits to the article as a result of my conflict of interest. Would someone with experience editing articles on non-profit organizations be able to review this request?

Thanks in advance for your help!

Regards,

Andrewggordon84 (talk) 14:14, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Seeking Help for Consumer Bankers Association article

Hello, Wikipedia! I work for Consumer Bankers Association (CBA), and I'd like to suggest some improvements for the CBA article. I've posted a request on the article's talk page, but there hasn't been any movement yet.

The current article is very short and has not been updated since 2008. I've suggested a draft to add more content to the existing sections and build off of those as sourcing allows. Please take a look at my proposed draft here - User:CBA NS/Consumer Bankers Association. I know about conflict of interest rules, and have done my best to follow them.

Are there any WikiProject Organizations editors who can take a look at the draft and copy over content or provide any feedback? Thank you! CBA NS (talk) 22:20, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Middle East Institute

Its entire article reads like an advertisement: "MEI fulfills this mission", "MEI continuously built its reputation" etc. -- 95.90.221.96 (talk) 23:20, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

RfC affecting this WikiProject

An RfC is underway at Talk:Ministry of Transport#RfC: Transport governance article titles which may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Please feel free to comment. Triptothecottage (talk) 10:13, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

A new newsletter directory is out!

A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.

– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Portal:European Space Agency for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether Portal:European Space Agency is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:European Space Agency until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:20, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Billy Starr

Hi all! I've created a draft article about Billy Starr – founder of the Pan-Mass Challenge – that's been in the AfC queue for nearly three months. I have a COI – I work with the Pan-Mass Challenge – so I'd like a second set of eyes on the article before it's published. If anyone here is up for taking a look, I'd appreciate it so much. Thank you! Mary Gaulke (talk) 02:50, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infoshops

Template:Infoshops has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mujinga (talk) 22:15, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Technical standards

A new WikiProject has been proposed where your knowledge and competence could be very useful.
You are invited to join the discussion about this proposal: Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Technical standards. Thanks. --Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 01:11, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

RfC of interest

This RfC may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:37, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation

Hello! I recieved a request to fix out of date information and graphics on this article. I reverted some changes due to COI and later recieved a note on my talk page. Maybe this is something one of the organizations aficionados could adopt? - Chip🐺 • #TeamTrees🌳 16:00, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Help creating charity page (COI)?

Hi. The short version: 1 - Can someone help me make a page? 2 - Can someone help me edit the material for the page to be compliant with Wikipedia's policies?
The charity I work for has asked me to create a Wikipedia page for the organisation. I'm aware of Wikipedia's policies around conflicts of interest so my current plan is to submit the page as an Article for Creation once I am able to create a draft (about 08.00 GMT Sat 07/12, assuming I get ten edits under my belt before then). I can see there are over 3,600 articles currently awaiting review (estimated wait five months). If I had someone from this WikiProject helping me would that allow me to get around the COI/AfC process? If so, would anyone be willing to help?
I'm also well aware of Wikipedia's policy on pages having a neutral point of view and the draft that I have been sent to upload is going to require significant work in this area. Removing the mission statement is easy enough but it's clearly been written from a promotional standpoint, e.g. it talks about our "very strong" processes without substantiating that superlative. Is there anyone who would be willing to help me wrangle what I've got into something useable?
And if I'm going about this entirely the wrong way any help and advice would be appreciated!
Thanks, and take care. --Tori C H (talk) 09:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

• @Tori C H: does the organisation meet the notability requirements as per WP:NGO? - Chip🐺 • #TeamTrees🌳 21:37, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

• @ChipWolf: The organisation is the Safer Living Foundation.
  

1. The organisation covers the Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire and Lincolnshire areas, although one project will work with any client who is able to travel to Nottingham city centre. I believe it could be classed as a nationally well-known local organisation on the basis of the evidence for point 2.

2. The organisation has won national awards including Third Sector Charity of the Year 2019 and The Guardian Public Service Leadership Excellence Award (SLF Chair, Lynn Saunders), as well as commendations in the Howard League Community Awards 2019 (The Aurora Project) and 2018. The SLF has presented posters at the ATSA Conference 2018 and 2019, and hosts an annual Prevention conference through NTU SOCAMRU (Sexual Offences, Crime and Misconduct Research Unit) with speakers from across the UK.

If it doesn't meet the requirements would adding a section for SLF/SOCAMRU on the NTU page and/or the HMP Whatton page be more appropriate? It's a joint venture between the two organisations.

Thanks, and take care. --Tori C H (talk) 10:02, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

• @Tori C H: I would personally consider it to meet WP:NGO; perhaps it may be a good idea to find similar organisations with existing articles to build consensus before moving this to the mainspace. Is there an article in draftspace you've started writing we can take a look at? - Chip🐺 • #TeamTrees🌳 19:50, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

New bot to remove completed infobox requests

Hello! I have recently created a bot to remove completed infobox requests and am sending this message to WikiProject Organizations since the project currently has a backlogged infobox request category. Details about the task can be found at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/PearBOT 2, but in short it removes all infobox requests from articles with an infobox, once a week. To sign up, reply with {{ping|Trialpears}} and tell me if any special considerations are required for the Wikiproject. For example: if only a specific infobox should be detected, such as {{infobox journal}} for WikiProject Academic Journals; or if an irregularly named infobox such as {{starbox begin}} should be detected. Feel free to ask if you have any questions!

Sent on behalf of Trialpears (talk) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Discussion at Template talk:Infobox organization#More parameters

 You are invited to join the discussion at Template talk:Infobox organization#More parameters. Italawar (talk) 04:17, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

National Association of Scholars - Your thoughts requested on Talk page

I created a section on Talk:National Association of Scholars titled, NPOV January 2020. Would you share your thoughts on the article there? (Or edit the article to improve it.) ¶ I read a Commentary in the Wall Street Journal Opinion section today that included this sentence: "Wikipedia describes us as a 'conservative' organization." That mention prompted me to look at the article. I did not know about the National Association of Scholars before today. I reviewed other Wikipedia articles about nonprofit (or trade union) educational organizations and none of them used an adjective denoting a political ideology in the article's short description or in the lede (introductory paragraph). Calling the National Association of Scholars a "conservative" organization struck me as neither consistent nor neutral. What do you think? (Please discuss at Talk:National Association of Scholars#NPOV January 2020—not here—so we're all on the same page.) Thanks! ¶ Citation: Peter W. Wood, "‘Cancel Culture’ Comes to Science", Wall Street Journal (January 13, 2020): A17.   - Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) (I'm a man—traditional male pronouns are fine.) 11:06, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

COI Edit Request

Hello, I am proposing extensive restructuring of the Earth Journalism Network page to address existing issues and bring it up to Wikipedia's standards. However, as an editor with a COI my requested edits have been declined, and I have instead been asked to discuss with editors engaged in the subject-area. It can be viewed at my second sandbox at User:Theintern007/sandbox2. Thank you in advance for looking over my request. Any feedback is appreciated. Theintern007 (talk) 19:54, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priashevshchina

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priashevshchina. DBigXrayᗙ 06:40, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Principles for Digital Development

Would some members from this WikiProject mind taking a look at Principles for Digital Development? There might be some COI editing involved based upon User talk: Diannaa#Principles for Digital Development, but that's something that can usually be sorted out without too much difficulty. I'm not seeing (at least at the moment) how this meets WP:GNG or even WP:NORG since it appears to be mainly sourced to the organization's website, even though the article might not specifically be about the organization per se. This might be a case where WP:NOBLE comes into play. Anyway, any input on this would be appreciated. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:17, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Discussion at Template_talk:Infobox_organization#New_parameters

Hi all! You are invited to participate at the discussion of adding new parameters to {{Infobox organization}} to implement a TFD outcome at Template_talk:Infobox_organization#New_parameters. Best, Mdaniels5757 (talk) 14:06, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

RfC at Alliance Defending Freedom

This RfC may be of interest to the members of this group. Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:56, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Texas Alliance of Energy Producers

Was wondering is some members of this WikiProject would mind taking a look at this article? I came across it via WP:THQ#posting a picture. There quite a bit of formatting cleanup that’s probably needed, but it’s the overall promotional tone and a bit iffy WP:NORG that might need a looking at by multiple errors. There may have been some WP:COI/WP:UPE editing over the years, including the most recent burst, but that can be cleaned up or trimmed out if the organization is notable. — Marchjuly (talk) 22:07, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Proposal for a taskforce on charitable organizations

We don't have a project that specifically covers charitable organizations, so it seems like this would be the place to originate one. BD2412 T 02:12, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

RfC on Turning Point USA

An RfC which may be of interest to the members of this project can be found here. Beyond My Ken (talk) 17:13, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

RfC on Project Veritas

Please see the RfC here, which may be of interest to members of this project. (Disclosure: I am employed by Project Veritas.) Sal at PV (talk) 02:47, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

CAT:NN

There are around 2000 articles in CAT:NN on organisations, some having been waiting almost 12 years. If anyone from this project could help look at those on the liunk, it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 14:56, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Checked your linked page and Category:All_articles_with_topics_of_unclear_notability. Didn't see a topic for organizations. What is the page to see just all organization articles of unclear notability? --Ian Korman (talk) 03:13, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

SNG for government organizations

Have extensively searched for any RfC or any other information about creation of an SNG for government (governmental) organizations. I did find some discussion about it here Wikipedia talk:Notability (organizations and companies)/Archive 19. The comments there about them are actually relevant for why I am looking for an SNG. I am specifically looking for more guidance for notability of legally defined governmental organizations in non-English speaking countries, work being done for the Wikipedia:WikiProject Thailand. Any further discussions, decisions or guidance anyone can point me to would be greatly appreciated. --Ian Korman (talk) 03:34, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Discussion at Template talk:Infobox organization § Proposal to remove 'extinction' parameter and change to 'dissolved'

 You are invited to join the discussion at Template talk:Infobox organization § Proposal to remove 'extinction' parameter and change to 'dissolved'. Funandtrvl (talk) 19:57, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Public Interest Legal Foundation

Neutrality of the article is under discussion, and all attempts to edit the article have been reverted. Discussion and input would be appreciated. Pkeets (talk) 15:38, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Internet Society History

Hi WikiProject Organizations editors: I am looking for editors to review a request at Talk:Internet Society. For those who are not aware, the Internet Society is a non-profit organization that promotes the development and use of an open, connected and secure Internet. I have proposed updates to the article's History section. More detail can be found on the article Talk page. I work at the Internet Society, so I have a conflict of interest. Can anyone help? Thank you. Neville at Internet Society (talk) 10:06, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!

Hello, Please note that Organization, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of Today's articles for improvement. The article is scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Today's articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 26 October 2020 (UTC) on behalf of the TAFI team

GAR notice

Red Tail Squadron, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm _Bacon 19:39, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

"Tech nonprofits" categorization issues

I just noticed that Category:Linux organizations is not connected in any way to the Category:Nonprofit organizations tree. This should be rectified. There are likely other categorical orphans of this sort.

This got me to thinking again about the lack of a Category:Technology nonprofits. There are a lot of groups to put in there, including entire subcategories of them (some of which do not exist as categories yet) like open-source and free-software organizations, technology and civil liberties organizations, technology standards organizations, communications infrastructure access organizations, technology-in-education organizations, etc., etc.

I'm not going to just leap into creating a big new category tree; it's worth discussing and planning (and I'm not a regular participant in this project anyway).  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  08:45, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Move discussion

Hi WP Organizations, I was wondering if anyone would like to offer an opinion on a discussion taking place at Talk:Autonomous_social_center#Requested_move_10_November_2020. Thanks for any comments! Mujinga (talk) 14:41, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

All Hands And Hearts - Smart Response listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for All Hands And Hearts - Smart Response to be moved to All Hands And Hearts. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 01:03, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Discussion of interest

Members of this project may be interested in this discussion. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:39, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Honest History

Hey guys, university student here.

I was wondering if any of you are interested to help make sure that elements of my article suits the style in which organisations are being written about. I want to note that this organisation currently functions more as a coalition rather than a formal association as it has deregistered recently.

Thanks. Ericisheretohelp (talk) 11:18, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!

Hello, Please note that Learned society, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the Articles for improvement. The article is scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 7 June 2021 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI team

Expert?

Hi. Can someone expert on organizations perhaps take a look at Draft:Center for Rural Development, with an eye to what tweaks (if any) are needed for promotion? It's a bit stuck in an approval rut. 2603:7000:2143:8500:643C:473C:C984:2D47 (talk) 07:03, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

GAR for Opus Dei

Opus Dei has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Talk 16:33, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Merger proposal (Effectiveness of Alcoholics Anonymous into Alcoholics Anonymous)=

Please see Talk:Alcoholics_Anonymous#Merger_proposal Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:43, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Merger proposal: Organizational studies & Organization studies

Please visit Talk:Organizational studies § Merger discussion, November 2021 to discuss the proposed merger of Organizational studies and Organization studies. Thanks! Biogeographist (talk) 01:45, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Advice on Draft for Organization

Hi, I'm hoping to get some advice on my draft Draft:Developing Radio Partners (I hope I linked that correctly). It was denied a couple months ago, and I believe I made all the requested changes, but I haven't been able to get someone to look at it since. I just made some updates to the page and added more sources, so I'm hoping someone can help me out and let me know if I need to make more changes or what I should do to get it reviewed/accepted. Thank you! Noahpdoty (talk) 18:12, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

FAR for Knights Templar

I have nominated Knights Templar for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 04:17, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Schutzstaffel → SS

An editor has opened a move discussion as to whether the article Schutzstaffel should be moved to SS. Your feedback would be welcome at Talk:Schutzstaffel#Requested move 28 March 2022. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 04:43, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

User script to detect unreliable sources

Main page: User:Headbomb/unreliable

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Integrity USA scandal in The Episcopal Church#Requested move 15 May 2022

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Integrity USA scandal in The Episcopal Church#Requested move 15 May 2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 23:46, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Canadian_Institute_of_Mining,_Metallurgy_and_Petroleum

This AfD may be of interest to members CT55555 (talk) 01:15, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Talk:Women Divers Hall of Fame

There's a discussion about listing inductees as redlinks based on the org itself. Your input is welcome. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 07:07, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Notice of Good Article reassessment

Hi there! This is a notice that I have opened an individual Good Article reassessment on the article College Republicans, which falls under the domain of this WikiProject. The review can be seen at this link (Talk:College Republicans/GA2) and any editor is welcome to help fix it up so that it can maintain GA status. Thanks! PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 00:25, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Requesting input

I'm requesting input at an RFC about who awards medals page. GoodDay (talk) 18:25, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Families USA COI edit requests

Hi! I've posted some COI edit requests at Talk:Families USA. Sharing in case anyone here is interested in taking a look. Thank you for any help or feedback! Mary Gaulke (talk) 16:35, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Posting here one more time to plead my case. These requests have been open since February, and I really think they could improve the depth and quality of sources and information in the article. I would welcome any feedback or assistance. Thanks again. Mary Gaulke (talk) 02:48, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

European Union

The European Union article has been thoroughly rearranged over the last week and discussion is currently ongoing at Talk:European Union about whether those changes have improved the article. It would be helpful if members of your wiki project could contribute. For reference, is the version of the article from before the recent changes. Furius (talk) 10:46, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Independent union (trade unionism)#Requested move 15 September 2022

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Independent union (trade unionism)#Requested move 15 September 2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. – robertsky (talk) 01:08, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Gates MRI request

Hi editors, I'm Lee. I work for the Bill & Melinda Gates Medical Research Institute and I was hoping to make some updates to the article that I think will help it be more complete and read a bit better. Because of my conflict of interest, I won't make any edits myself. I'd really appreciate it if someone here was willing to take a look! LBGatesMRI (talk) 21:56, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Issue One request

Hi there, WikiProject Organizations members. I have posted a request to the Issue One Talk page that outlines a proposed update to the article's History section. I suggest retitling the section as "Formation" and simplifying some of the details about the Issue One predecessor organizations.

I have a conflict of interest as I work at Issue One, so my hope is that I can get an experienced editor to review what I've put together and then implement the changes if they seem like improvements. Any help or feedback you can provide would be appreciated! AR at Issue One (talk) 14:15, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Posting here one more time in order to bump this post. I've yet to receive any responses to my Talk page request about the History section. Again, hoping an experienced editor can provide some feedback or at least point me in the right direction for further assistance. Thank you. AR at Issue One (talk) 21:05, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Posting here as an update — I've now posted an additional request for updates to the Organization section on the Issue One Talk page The request for updates to the History section remains outstanding. I'm hopeful that an experienced editor can make one or both of these edits, or at least provide some feedback. Thank you! AR at Issue One (talk) 14:52, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

ASPCA assistance

Hi! My name is Daysi, I am an employee of ASPCA, here to find editors who could help me get some updates made to the ASPCA article. I disclosed my conflict of interest, and am not going to make any direct edits to the article. I thought folks in this group may be interested in reviewing my request. Thanks for looking! Daysiyeates (talk) 18:46, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Seeking Consensus on Quality- and Importance-Rating Changes

Hello, this is regarding the National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment page. I performed a substantial revision of the page last year (2022) but it might have been ranked by this WikiProject before I completed it. Unsure. The article qualifies as a B-class on the quality scale according to Wikipedia:Content assessment/B-Class criteria 1-6. If editors believe the article contains irrelevant material, it should return to C-class until the extraneous material is removed. Please point out this material to me.
Regarding this article's importance ranking. It is now mid-importance on par with American National Standards Institute. Both groups write standards which have been adopted by the federal government or have had a substantive influence on federal regulations or guidelines. The National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment, however, is more specialized than the American National Standards Institute. I look forward to your comments and assistance. My advance thanks! PatriciaBishop (talk) 21:15, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Suggestions on changes for Moose

Given the changes at https://www.mooseintl.org/one-moose-a-reality/ , any suggestions on how to change the pages related to the Moose would be welcome.Naraht (talk) 14:29, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Project-independent quality assessments

Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 19:33, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Bitcoin Foundation#Requested move 17 May 2023

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Bitcoin Foundation#Requested move 17 May 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. UtherSRG (talk) 17:47, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

US Nonprofit EIN and flagging revocations

Is there any existing work to ensure US nonprofits have an associated EIN so that the EIN could be used to flag those appearing on the revocation list for US nonprofits and fix their status if/when they are reinstated? https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/search-for-tax-exempt-organizations#revoke2 If not, is there any interest in a task force to work on US nonprofit infoboxes to ensure the tax_id field lists the EIN and the EIN is listed as the key value https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P1297 on the associated Wikidata item? This ID would also help readers and editor to find more information about the organization's financials. Wolfgang8741 says: If not you, then who? (talk) 13:12, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

RfC - Inclusion of Opera about this organisation being mentioned on this page

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Chicago CRED. Aaron Liu (talk) 21:12, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Sea Turtle, Inc.#Requested move 1 June 2023

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Sea Turtle, Inc.#Requested move 1 June 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. UtherSRG (talk) 10:49, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for NATO

NATO has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:40, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Discussion on NCORP vs GNG and the use of NMUSIC #5

Although originally started to discuss idiosyncrasies around NMUSIC #5 which defines the notability of musical albums, there's a considerable debate around the interrelation between GNG vs NCORP. The discussion is at Wikipedia_talk:Notability#Concerns_about_NBAND_#5 Graywalls (talk) 06:21, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Environmental Working Group - discussions need more editors!

I'm working on the Environmental Working Group where more editors would be appreciated to improve coverage of this Non profit organisation. The talk page has a couple of discussions that have reached a bit of an impasse and more editors could help move things forwards.

• Talk:Environmental Working Group#Sunscreens: unexplained revert
• Talk:Environmental Working Group#PFAS pollution

Thanks and see you there! {{u|Gtoffoletto}}  ^talk 14:42, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Habitat for Humanity

There are current discussions to merge NYC chapter and Jacksonville, FL chapter into the main article. Talk:Habitat_for_Humanity and Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/HabiJax Graywalls (talk) 22:37, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

FAR for Voluntary Human Extinction Movement

I have nominated Voluntary Human Extinction Movement for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 03:38, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Move discussion notification

An editor has requested that Fremantle Arts Centre (organisation) be moved to Fremantle Arts Centre, which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You are invited to participate in the move discussion. Skyerise (talk) 16:52, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals branches

Currently, there are numerous branches and many of them are just purely terribly sourced and advertorial in nature. Some are so fluffy they're not even worth a merge and a straight re-direct will do. There are still many branch articles left and I am seeing if others have input on how to go about it. Which ones should be moved into Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals per WP:BRANCH and which ones are worthy of retaining as their own? Graywalls (talk) 08:02, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Entrepreneurs of Knoxville

Could someone from this WikiProject take a look at Entrepreneurs of Knoxville and assess it per WP:NORG? It's been around for more than ten years, but it never seems to have had the WP:ORGDEPTH type of coverage that clearly establishes its Wikipedia notability. It also looks like members of the organization might have created the page and have been doing most of the editing. I removed a WP:NOTDIRECTORY-type section, but there's probably much more that needs to be done if notability can be established. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:36, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

MOS:EGG in Template:Infobox company

I've proposed updating Template:Infobox company's documentation to avoid a potential MOS:EGG issue. Please give your thoughts in that discussion. Ed ^{[talk] [OMT]} 01:24, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Help? RFC on Lifeboat Foundation

The organization Lifeboat Foundation seems questionable to me... I updated the article to add a note that they had their IRS nonprofit status revoked in 2020, which I confirmed on the IRS website.... It is unclear what it does with donations. Should the whole article be revamped with a bit more... how do you deal with an organization when you aren't sure whether it is a scam or not? It looks like its talk page hasn't been touched in 11 years. Chadnibal (talk) 01:35, 7 February 2024 (UTC)