User talk:Dentren

Please note that if you post something for me here, put this page on your watch list -- I'll respond to it here.

If I posted on your talk page, you can reply on your talk page and I'll be watching your page.

This makes it easier for both of us to keep everything in context.

Thanks.

'''

You could change the name of the article about the Chilean military dictatorship by its old name, since the user, since I do not know how to do it. I would greatly appreciate your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.83.208.210 (talk) 18:29, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

November 2015 newsletter
– Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 23:45, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ETA (separatist group), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Mundo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Extinct volcanoes of the Andes
Template:Extinct volcanoes of the Andes has been nominated for merging with Template:Andean volcanoes. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 14:17, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Juan Garland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cabildo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Caicumeo
 * added a link pointing to El Camino Real


 * Coastal fortifications of colonial Chile
 * added a link pointing to Niebla

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * José Marín de Velasco
 * added links pointing to Cabildo and Calbuco, Chile


 * LOM Ediciones
 * added a link pointing to Press


 * Stereotypes of Argentines
 * added a link pointing to Arrogant

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:09, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Góngora
Hello, about this Góngora thing. The problem is not necessarily that other persons may bear that name as well, but the question is whether they are referred to as Góngora. I must admit I don't know the poet, but when I run an internet search on Góngora, the vast majority of results are related to the poet and not any other person. In Wikipedia terms that would be called the primary topic, if you are familiar with the concept. That's also the way it was set up before you modified the page. Do you therefore have anything substantial which could motivate a change of primary topic? If you do, I would suggest we revert the name to its original redirect, and file a WP:RM request so that other editors could judge if a change of primary topic is appropriate. Rgds, --Midas02 (talk) 19:18, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Wikiproject Food and Drink Newsletter – March 2016
– Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 17:26, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited José Antonio Pareja, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Cape St Vincent. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Wikiproject Food and Drink Newsletter – April 2016
– Sent by Northamerica1000 using mass messaging on 17:00, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pedro de Villagra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ávila. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participate
Hi

Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. We welcome you to have a look. Feel free to participate.

You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:
 * Publish an article to the journal.
 * Sign up as a peer reviewer of potential upcoming articles. If you do not have expertise in these subjects, you can help in finding peer reviewers for current submissions.
 * Sign up as an editor, and help out in open tasks.
 * Outreach to potential contributors, with can include (but is not limited to) scholars and health professionals. In any mention of Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, there may be a reference to this Contribute-page. Example presentation about the journal.
 * Add a post-publication review of an existing publication. If errors are found, there are guidelines for editing published works.
 * Apply to become the treasurer of the journal
 * Join the editorial board.
 * Share your ideas of what the journal would be like in the future as separate Wikimedia project.
 * Donate to Wikimedia Foundation.
 * Translate journal pages into other languages. Wikiversity currently exists in the following other languages
 * Ceština, Deutsch, Español, Français, Italiano, 한국어, Português, Slovenšcina, Suomi, Svenska, Ελληνικά, Русский, العربية, 日本語
 * Sign up to get emails related to the journal, which are sent to . If you want to receive these emails too, state your interest at the talk page, or contact the Editor-in-chief at.
 * Spread the word to anyone who could be interested or could benefit from it.

The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.

-from and others of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.

 D ip ta ns hu Talk 10:20, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

The WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter (August 2016)
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter: September 2016
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:04, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Food and drink Newsletter: October 2016
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:47, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Food and Drink Newsletter: November 2016
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:28, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Causes of the War of the Pacific
Please be aware that an Requests for mediation/Causes of the War of the Pacific case has been brought up which concerns you. -- Keysanger (talk) 14:46, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Chilean expansionism
Hi Dentren! I hope you're enjoying your holiday season. Thank you for the edits on the article Chilean expansionism. Do keep an eye on it and let me know if there is any material there that might need further improvement or referencing (I'm still reading a few more books on the subject). Best regards.--MarshalN20 ✉🕊 23:49, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Timeline of Valdivian history for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timeline of Valdivian history is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Timeline of Valdivian history until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 19:53, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:People of the German colonization of southern Chile
Template:People of the German colonization of southern Chile has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:07, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Your signature
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated  tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. Also, your signature has an unescaped pipe character, which must be coded as  to avoid messing up templates.

Please change
 * : Dentren  |  Ta lk

to
 * : Dentren &#124; Talk

—Anomalocaris (talk) 20:00, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I see from this edit that these matters have not yet been addressed. The exposed pipe character is causing problems, for example with the RfC listing pages - where this addition is only partially displayed. I have partially fixed your posts in that thread, with the effect that the RfC is now listed properly - but I would be grateful if you would fix your signature so that such problems do not occur gong forward. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 21:08, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Pelotillehue for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pelotillehue is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pelotillehue until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 12:20, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Pedro Sánchez de la Hoz for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pedro Sánchez de la Hoz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pedro Sánchez de la Hoz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kirbanzo (talk) 14:07, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Tricontinental Chile for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tricontinental Chile is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tricontinental Chile until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. funplussmart (talk) 00:23, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Category:Roman Catholic trade unionists has been nominated for discussion
Category:Roman Catholic trade unionists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TM 00:57, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

LLifén listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect LLifén. Since you had some involvement with the LLifén redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:33, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Seismic faults of South America
Template:Seismic faults of South America has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.  Zack mann  (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:07, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Francisco de Carvajal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sack of Rome ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Francisco_de_Carvajal check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Francisco_de_Carvajal?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:45, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Region de los Rios2.PNG


The file File:Region de los Rios2.PNG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of agriculture in Chile, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Campesino ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/History_of_agriculture_in_Chile check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/History_of_agriculture_in_Chile?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:16, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Punta Gruesa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chilean ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Battle_of_Punta_Gruesa check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Battle_of_Punta_Gruesa?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Hi. I see in a recent addition to Human sacrifice you included material copied from 1960 Valdivia earthquake. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying within Wikipedia in the future. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:09, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Request for help
Hello Dentren. I wanted to ask for help with an article I made recently (Manuel Hipólito Orella), to improve grammar and structure since my English is not very refined. I realized that you are interested in the story, and since the article is about a historical character, it occurred to me to make this request. Hope you access the request, the article is not long. Please. --Muwatallis II (talk) 21:07, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello Muwatallis II. I will take a look at the article. I have also noticed that you have many interesting articles in your workspace. Such as User:Muwatallis II/sandbox/003 and User:Muwatallis II/sandbox/004, whould you mind to publish them? Dentren  |  Ta lk  06:02, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Ok, it will be my priority to finish them and publish them. --Muwatallis II (talk) 00:00, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
You are edit warring to keep reliably sourced information hidden in a footnote. This is inappropriate. Please self-revert. Simonm223 (talk) 14:45, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Conspiracy theories about Adolf Hitler's death
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Conspiracy theories about Adolf Hitler's death; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Mapuche artists


A tag has been placed on Category:Mapuche artists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:21, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mapuche, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tehuelche ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Mapuche check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Mapuche?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:27, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Jesuit missionaries in Alta California


A tag has been placed on Category:Jesuit missionaries in Alta California requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:08, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
 * UnitedStatesian, go ahead en delete. It was a mistake. Dentren  |  Ta lk  10:40, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks, it will be gone in 7 days. Unless you want to put the tag on it. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:15, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
Your recent editing history at Conspiracy theories about Adolf Hitler's death shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Acroterion   (talk)   14:05, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
 * This is the second time you've been warned for edit-warring on this subject.  Acroterion   (talk)   14:06, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Acroterion, I see you are circumbenting WP:3RR with the aid of User:Kierzek. As I explained in your talk page I have invited you to participate in the talk page of Conspiracy theories about Adolf Hitler's death. Dentren  |  Ta lk  14:14, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Condena por hurto de Boric

Muy mal hecho por parte de zUsuario:Superzerocool en tratar de suprimir información judicial sobre Boric. Las condenas judiciales son públicas. Estos son hechos que resurgen de ves en cuando en cuanto a la crítica del carácter moral de Boric. Lo sensato es tener una discusión sobre si incluir la información o no.

DYK for Battle of Río Bueno
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Edit warring at Conspiracy theories about Adolf Hitler's death
C'mon, now; you've been around for many years, and you should know better. Please stop insisting on your PoV at Conspiracy theories about Adolf Hitler's death, observe WP:BRD, and talk it out on the Talk page. Thaks, Mathglot (talk) 10:41, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * WP:BRD is not working because users who oppose my edits are not caring about reading what is actually said and are missproying me as a promoter of constiracy theories. Being "around for many years" means that I also know when one's well-intended edits are dismissed on poor grounds. I mean users who does even take their time to read what one's comments. Dentren  |  Ta lk  10:59, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Jesuit musicians


A tag has been placed on Category:Jesuit musicians requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 19:51, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nicolás Larraín


The article Nicolás Larraín has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication this biography is passing WP:NBIO."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:11, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1580 in the Captaincy General of Chile


A tag has been placed on Category:1580 in the Captaincy General of Chile requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 12:39, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1640s establishments in the Captaincy General of Chile


A tag has been placed on Category:1640s establishments in the Captaincy General of Chile requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 12:52, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1645 in the Captaincy General of Chile


A tag has been placed on Category:1645 in the Captaincy General of Chile requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 12:54, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1796 in the Captaincy General of Chile


A tag has been placed on Category:1796 in the Captaincy General of Chile requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 13:02, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:South American racehorses


A tag has been placed on Category:South American racehorses requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 00:20, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Huilo-Huilo Biological Reserve, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Campesino ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Huilo-Huilo_Biological_Reserve check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Huilo-Huilo_Biological_Reserve?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Military dictatorship of Chile (1973–1990), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peña ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Military_dictatorship_of_Chile_%281973%E2%80%931990%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Military_dictatorship_of_Chile_%281973%E2%80%931990%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Category:Echinoderms of Chile has been nominated for merging
Category:Echinoderms of Chile has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor(talk) 05:02, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Mexican music in Chile
Hello! Your submission of Mexican music in Chile at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! King of ♥</b><b style="color:red"> ♦</b><b style="color:black"> ♣</b><b style="color:black"> ♠</b> 05:08, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 12:25, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi again. Since a prep builder placed your image in the lead slot, I created a stub article for María José Quintanilla. Feel free to expand it, and even nominate it for DYK. Best, Yoninah (talk) 13:20, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Mexican music in Chile
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Jesuit missionaries in Mexico


A tag has been placed on Category:Jesuit missionaries in Mexico requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 14:37, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Professor Matti Seppälä
Professor Matti Seppälä has passed away. I tried to update this into the article. There may still be details to fix.--Urjanhai (talk) 09:04, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Restaurants in Chile


A tag has been placed on Category:Restaurants in Chile requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 16:09, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Mapuche scientists


A tag has been placed on Category:Mapuche scientists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Place Clichy (talk) 13:07, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Mapuche academics


A tag has been placed on Category:Mapuche academics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Place Clichy (talk) 13:07, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Governors of the Magallanes Territory


A tag has been placed on Category:Governors of the Magallanes Territory requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 16:17, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited White Earthquake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moribund.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Mate (drink), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:38, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

My disruptive behaviour?
Have you been paying attention to the article or are you seeing t he red alert and reacting? An anon has sourced the content and so you should be aware that you are now fighting against sources and WP:CONSENSUS. That is the definition of disruptive behaviour. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:35, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * That key content need to be clearly sourced with reliable sources is not up for "consensus". So far you have failed to provide a rationale on why the origins of mate mentioned in the infobox should not be clearly sourced with WP:RS. If you insist with disruptive behaviour that is contrary to Wikipedia policy, and in fact fact reminiscent of WP:OWN, I will report you. <b style="color:green">Dentren</b> &#124; <b style="color: Grey;">Ta</b><b style="color: Green">lk</b> 01:46, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I'd love to see you make that point in an ANI (or similar) discussion. You'd be laughed at. and speaking of OWN... don't be so quick to claim that of others when you're clearly showing that behaviour yourself. I am a caretaker and when editors like you come along I correct them. I'm fin to continue this discussion in the correct venue though. Feel free to report me and be prepared for a very large WP:BOOMERANG. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:57, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Category:18th-century Belgian Jesuits has been nominated for merging
Category:18th-century Belgian Jesuits has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 19:01, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

Category:17th-century Belgian Jesuits has been nominated for merging
Category:17th-century Belgian Jesuits has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 11:02, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:18th-century Belgian Roman Catholic priests


A tag has been placed on Category:18th-century Belgian Roman Catholic priests indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 13:35, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Category:17th-century Belgian Roman Catholic priests has been nominated for merging
Category:17th-century Belgian Roman Catholic priests has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 21:42, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:18th-century Belgian clergy


A tag has been placed on Category:18th-century Belgian clergy indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 15:52, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:17th-century Belgian clergy


A tag has been placed on Category:17th-century Belgian clergy indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 14:25, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crimen (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glamour.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Prisoners of the Revolt for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prisoners of the Revolt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Prisoners of the Revolt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kuatrero (talk) 06:20, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aftershock (2012 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ariel Levy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rebelde Neltume.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Rebelde Neltume.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:02, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Attempted assassination of Augusto Pinochet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page José Carrasco.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Timeline of the history of Chile
Template:Timeline of the history of Chile has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 09:38, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Argentina–Chile border, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manso River.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Gabriel Boric
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Tuvixer (talk) 09:27, 17 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Stop hand nuvola.svg Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Tuvixer (talk) 20:33, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

"Inflación en Chile" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Inflación en Chile and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 18 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Bedivere (talk) 18:47, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Gabriel Boric
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Tuvixer (talk) 09:33, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Inflation in Chile
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Tuvixer (talk) 09:34, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Medical College
Have fun. --Bedivere (talk) 18:56, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Explosions in South America by country


A tag has been placed on Category:Explosions in South America by country indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 03:14, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 6
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Chilean Spanish
 * added a link pointing to El Mundo
 * Spanish dialects and varieties
 * added a link pointing to El Mundo

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
Hello, I'm Bedivere. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Izkia Siches seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''This is like the third time we encounter while you're trying to make non neutral changes. I will have to report you at ANI if you continue to so so.'' Bedivere (talk) 16:13, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Izkia Siches, you may be blocked from editing. Bedivere (talk) 16:19, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at El Líbero. Bedivere (talk) 16:39, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Bedivere (talk) 20:49, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px"> You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Izkia Siches. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 13:30, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Bedivere (talk) 22:34, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px"> You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 02:21, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Repeated disruptive editing warning
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at El Líbero. You've already been blocked once for the exact same reason. Are you trying to get blocked permanently? Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 03:36, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
 * What a misleading statement. Take a look inte the history of the article to see who is who. <b style="color:green">Dentren</b> &#124; <b style="color: Grey;">Ta</b><b style="color: Green">lk</b> 15:30, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
Your recent editing history at El Líbero shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bedivere (talk) 19:14, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Bedivere (talk) 20:06, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px"> You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for edit warring, as you did at El Líbero. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 20:50, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
 * If you edit-war again after expiration of this block, the next block will be indefinite.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:50, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Bedivere (talk) 11:57, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Warning
Dentren, please don't issue edit warring disruptive editing warnings weeks after the fact. These should be issued within days at max. Weeks is too stale. Thanks. El_C 13:27, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * El_C, yes it is indeed late. I was going to issue the warning earlier but could not do so. <b style="color:green">Dentren</b> &#124; <b style="color: Grey;">Ta</b><b style="color: Green">lk</b> 22:22, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Gabriel Boric
The article being incomplete, does not mean it is non neutral. If you want to add content, you can just go ahead and add it. Obviously, it needs to comply with Wikipedia policies such as WP:NPOV and WP:UNDUE. Bedivere (talk) 15:47, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Bedivere (talk) 16:03, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Alcalde of Valdivia
Template:Alcalde of Valdivia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:52, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Standard ArbCom discretionary sanctions notices
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Newimpartial (talk) 19:49, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Amarillos por Chile politicians


A tag has been placed on Category:Amarillos por Chile politicians indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 01:10, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Gabriel Boric
Please stop edit warring. Thanks. Drmies (talk) 00:39, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Amarillos por Chile, you may be blocked from editing. Bedivere (talk) 19:00, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Bedivere, just a reminder I have denounced your behaviour here: Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents. <b style="color:green">Dentren</b> &#124; <b style="color: Grey;">Ta</b><b style="color: Green">lk</b> 19:16, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Bedivere (talk) 16:19, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px"> You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 01:04, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Death flights
"(Undid revision 1104627365 by Citizen127 (talk)-not evidently unencyclopedic, discuss in talk first)" I did, you ignored it: "The section titled "Extraordinary rendition" is clearly a political editorial designed to discredit the US.  The source is a political editorial written by one man not "scholars."  This exaggeration appears to be intended to make the source seem more credible.  The use of the term "US-led" here is political spin.  There is no logical reason why a Wikipedia article about death flights should have a section on extraordinary rendition.  Someone with a grudge against the US is trying to conflate the two for political reasons. Citizen127"  Why would anyone deliberately ignore all that in this forum? Ignoring verifiable evidence, what does that mean? Citizen127 (talk) 13:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Category:Mapuche territorial units has been nominated for merging
Category:Mapuche territorial units has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:21, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Blocked
I have blocked you indefinitely because it is clear that you are refusing to get the point and change your conduct, despite a unanimous consensus in the ANI thread that you started that it is problematic. You have returned from a three-month block to continue the same dispute so it is clear that a temporary block would not be sufficient. You can appeal this block by posting and it will be reviewed by another uninvolved admin. I would suggest you read the guide to appealing blocks first, then compare your conduct to our behavioural policies. <b style="color: teal; font-family: Tahoma">HJ Mitchell</b> &#124; <span style="color: navy; font-family: Times New Roman" title="(Talk page)">Penny for your thoughts? 13:10, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Come on, Dentren. The first you did after being unblocked was reinstating a "neutrality" tag on the Gabriel Boric article just because (as it reads from your talk page post) it is kind of outdated or it does not reflect some recent political controversies. Not only the tag is unwarranted, it is obvious you only intend to force your point of view onto articles and onto others. HJ has acted correctly. --Bedivere (talk) 17:39, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Assassination of Jaime Guzmán
Hello, Dentren. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Assassination of Jaime Guzmán, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

==Discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 June 18 § Category:Association football people by prefecture in Japan== You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 June 18 § Category:Association football people by prefecture in Japan. Qwerfjkl talk  16:39, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

CfD nomination at
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at  on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkl talk  11:32, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:People of the Chincha Islands War by nationality has been nominated for merging
Category:People of the Chincha Islands War by nationality has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 15:07, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Category:Spanish literature academics has been nominated for renaming
Category:Spanish literature academics has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:00, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Category:Chilean journalists by type has been nominated for merging
Category:Chilean journalists by type has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 20:35, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Category:17th-century Chilean historians has been nominated for splitting
Category:17th-century Chilean historians has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:58, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Category:Slavery in Chile has been nominated for splitting
Category:Slavery in Chile has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 17:18, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Category:Former penal colonies has been nominated for renaming
Category:Former penal colonies has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –<b style="color:#77b">Laundry</b><b style="color:#fb0">Pizza</b><b style="color:#b00">03</b> ( d c̄ ) 06:20, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Category:Mapuche farmers has been nominated for deletion
Category:Mapuche farmers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:57, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Category:People of Inca royalty descent has been nominated for merging
Category:People of Inca royalty descent has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:27, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

"Regordinho" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Regordinho&redirect=no Regordinho] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Mazewaxie ( talk  •  contribs ) 13:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cine Club


The article Cine Club has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Notability not established with substantive sources"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 16:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Category:Jesuit musicians has been nominated for deletion
Category:Jesuit musicians has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:52, 14 June 2024 (UTC)