User talk:Rich Farmbrough/Archive/2012 August

Transclusion problem
Hi Rich, would you know where a vandal could have gotten in the templates such that it links back to his user page? These links shouldn't be and it would be good to remove them per DENY. I can't find the link. It pertains to this thread and there is this archived SPI case. He has been using open proxies and likes to taunt. Any help you can offer would be appreciated. Cheers, — Berean Hunter   (talk)  17:50, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * There are currently no transclusions - lots of links but they seem to be legitimate, as far as I have looked. Rich Farmbrough, 00:33, 2 August 2012 (UTC).


 * Check again. Something really weird happening imo. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 01:08, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Here is the evidence for the first assertion. Is there an example of a linked to page that seems odd you could provide? Rich Farmbrough, 01:14, 2 August 2012 (UTC).


 * Looks like it's fixed now. Yesterday a huge number or articles and Wikipedia core pages linked to that user page. No longer, maybe I missed some initial vandalism and when I looked at the pages that link here some sort of propagation was going on? Either way it's now okay. So no problem. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 01:23, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * OK cool. Rich Farmbrough, 01:25, 2 August 2012 (UTC).


 * Apart from pages in his sockpuppet categories I see the following linked to.


 * 1) Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Earth Exploding Live
 * 2) User talk:115.118.195.23
 * 3) User talk:171.98.154.2
 * 4) User talk:95.143.115.77
 * 5) User talk:Casliber
 * 6) User:Hopiakuta/ You do keep accusing me of malware
 * 7) User:Kathryn NicDhàna/Admin Toolbox
 * 8) User:Moste Helpful Assistante
 * 9) User:Pigman/Admin toolbox
 * 10) Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard
 * 11) Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive235
 * 12) Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive762
 * 13) Wikipedia:Help desk
 * 14) Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Earth Exploding Live
 * 15) Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Earth Exploding Live/Archive

(I would turn these into links buut that would require automation.) Rich Farmbrough, 01:24, 2 August 2012 (UTC).


 * Not sure if it was intended, but I found the above extremely funny. :) Regards, SunCreator (talk) 01:32, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Riicchhhhh
...you should add yourself to the host page damnit! WP:Teahouse/Hosts :) You know you want tooooooooooo ;-) SarahStierch (talk) 22:52, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Done. Rich Farmbrough, 01:45, 2 August 2012 (UTC).

Did YOU know
I liked the quote of the day, and it's nearly the same thing as a Sam Cooke song, "A Change Is Gonna Come"-- the second stanza is "It's been too hard living but I'm afraid to die 'Cause I don't know what's up there beyond the sky It's been a long, a long time coming, but I know a change gonna come, oh yes it will". It is truly a great song covered by a lot of the early sixties soul singers and many others since then, and worth hearing and seeing the track here:  (Copied from MetroLyrics.com) --Leahtwosaints (talk) 10:13, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. There was another song from that era - "Everybody wants to go to Heaven, but nobody wants to die." Rich Farmbrough, 02:21, 2 August 2012 (UTC).

Talk:Institute of Mathematics and its Applications
You may be interested in Talk:Institute of Mathematics and its Applications, which relates to merging a stub you started a while ago. Yaris678 (talk) 14:18, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Many thanks, commented there. Rich Farmbrough, 16:01, 2 August 2012 (UTC).

Re: Arybhata Pi
Hello, You have one new message here: User_talk:Titodutta -- Tito Dutta  ✉  19:58, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅ Answered on user's talk page. Rich Farmbrough, 21:04, 2 August 2012 (UTC).
 * ✅ Answered on user's talk page. Rich Farmbrough, 21:04, 2 August 2012 (UTC).

Regex
Is it okay to ask you about Regex? I'm trying to learn and read about it but some things I've tried don't work as intended so I'm a little stuck. It's okay if your not interested I can't try the help desk. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 01:36, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Go ahead. Rich Farmbrough, 01:39, 2 August 2012 (UTC).


 * Starting with the AWB typo rule of 
 * The above rule works but I encountered some spelling "manuafracture" and "Manuafacture" that this rule is doesn't detect. So I tried extending the comparison by adding "|[ua]fa" thus ending up with \b([Mm])an(?:[ai]fac?|[ua]fa|[au]fa)[ct]ur(e[ds]?|ers?|ing)\b" but this didn't work.
 * Now I figure the problem is that it's only comparing to one character 'u', so how to I extend the rule to match the two letter 'ua'? Regards, SunCreator (talk) 01:48, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

To allow for two crudely
 * \b([Mm])an(?:[ai]fac?|[ua][ua]fa|[au]fa)[ct]ur(e[ds]?|ers?|ing)\b"

One or two you can use
 * \b([Mm])an(?:[ai]fac?|[ua]{1,2}fa|[au]fa)[ct]ur(e[ds]?|ers?|ing)\b"

But this replicates the next [au]fa


 * \b([Mm])an(?:[ai]fac?|[au]{1,2}fa)[ct]ur(e[ds]?|ers?|ing)\b"

We can include missing vowel "Manfacture"


 * \b([Mm])an(?:[ai]fac?|[au]{0,2}fa)[ct]ur(e[ds]?|ers?|ing)\b"

And multiples giving a simpler (looking) rule


 * \b([Mm])an(?:[ai]fac?|[au]*fa)[ct]ur(e[ds]?|ers?|ing)\b"

Note though that we are still not matching everything we probably want because of the [ct].


 * \b([Mm])an(?:[ai]|[au]*)fa[ct]{1,3}ur(e[ds]?|ers?|ing)\b"

This fixes that problem. But the (?:[ai]|[au]*) is notw a little redundant


 * \b([Mm])an(?:[ai]|[au]*)fa[ct]{1,3}ur(e[ds]?|ers?|ing)\b"

This deals with that problem without, probably matching stuff we don't want.


 * \b([Mm])an[aiu]*fa[ct]{1,3}ur(e[ds]?|ers?|ing)\b"

Rich Farmbrough, 02:06, 2 August 2012 (UTC).


 * None of those work on Manuafracture. Maybe it's the regex tester in AWB? Anyway, have to sleep. Will check through this another time. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 02:16, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * \b([Mm])an[aiu]*fr?a[ct]{1,3}ur(e[ds]?|ers?|ing)\b" Rich Farmbrough, 02:28, 2 August 2012 (UTC).


 * The early rules above say [ai] but it should say [aiu], then they work on the start 'manauf'.
 * I can NOT use the * as AWB/T says "Don't use the quantifiers * and + with anything but a single character. Avoid them entirely, if possible, as they put extra strain on CPU and are apt to do other than what you expect."
 * I'm not sure what the {1,3} (1-of-3) applies to. Does that mean 1-of-3 of the 'fact' or just the 'ct'? I'm confused by that at the moment.
 * Here is my first revised version \b([Mm])an(?:[aiu]{0,2}fr?ac?|[ua]fa|[au]fa)[ct]ur(e[ds]?|ers?|ing)\b
 * Next I'm going to add (Re) at the beginning and check (in a dictionary) for different possible endings. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 13:11, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Added the start (Re) and (Un) and ending able/ability, plus "man'o'facture" is covered.
 * \b(M|m|[Rr]em|[Uu]nm)[au]n(?:[aiou]{0,2}fr?ac?|[ua]fa|[au]fa)[ct]ur(e[ds]?|ers?|ing|e?able|e?ability)\b Regards, SunCreator (talk) 14:47, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * OK that's cool.
 * {x,y} matches x, x+1 ... y-1, y occurrences.
 * [au] and [ua] are the same, they both match a or u.
 * The instructions about not using * and + are sage, but not wholly valid. Certainly the CPU comment depends very much on the actual regex.  Consider for example vowel matching "[aeiou]+" vs "[aeiou]{1,2}".  (Maybe [eaiou]+ for speed...) This will generally be matching a one vowel string, and sometimes 2 - there will be almost no 3 vowel matches.  Let us suppose that 25% of characters are vowels and that we have a uniform random distribution of letters.


 * As you can see not until we get to four vowels in a row does the {1,2} method become cheaper than + — and that is at the expense of missing 6.25 % of the items we want to match.
 * I would replace (M|m|[Rr]em|[Uu]nm) with ((?:[Uu]n|[Rr]e|)[Mm]) - this is - to me at least - clearer in function. It does of course match UnM and leave it mis-capitaliɀed
 * [ct]ur only matches "cur" or "tur" - it is relying on the "c?" of "fr?ac?" to match "factur".
 * All the best, Rich Farmbrough, 16:33, 2 August 2012 (UTC).


 * Thanks! I don't understand the CPU maths and at this point it is of little use on rocking the previous consensus. It's really cool what you've done with the rule. It's given me a lot more understanding and ability when using regex. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 23:23, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

The Tea Leaf - Issue Five
Hi! Welcome to the fifth edition of The Tea Leaf, the official newsletter of the Teahouse!


 * Guest activity increased in July. Questions are up from an average of 36 per week in June to 43 per week in July, and guest profile creation has also increased. This is likely a result of the automatic invite experiments we started near the end of month, which seeks to lessen the burden on hosts and other volunteers who manually invite editors. During the last week of July, questions doubled in the Teahouse! (But don't let that deter you from inviting editors to the Teahouse, please, there are still lots of new editors who haven't found Teahouse yet.)
 * More Teahouse hosts than ever. We had 12 new hosts sign up to participate at the Teahouse! We now have 35 hosts volunteering at the Teahouse. Feel free to stop by and see them all here.
 * Phase two update: Host sprint. In August, the Teahouse team plans to improve the host experience by developing a simpler new-host creation process, a better way of surfacing active hosts, and a host lounge renovation. Take a look at the plan and weigh in here.
 * New Teahouse guest barnstar is awarded to first recipient: Charlie Inks. Using the Teahouse barnstar designed by Heatherawalls, hosts hajatvrc and Ryan Vesey created the new Teahouse Guest Barnstar. The first recipient is Charlie Inks, for her boldness in asking questions at the Teahouse. Check out the award in action here.
 * Teahouse was a hot topic at Wikimania! The Teahouse was a hot topic at Wikimania this past month, where editor retention and interface design was heavily discussed. Sarah and Jonathan presented the Teahouse during the Wikimedia Fellowships panel. Slides can be viewed here. A lunch was also held at Wikimania for Teahouse hosts.

As always, thanks for supporting the Teahouse project! Stop by and visit us today!

You are receiving The Tea Leaf after expressing interest or participating in the Teahouse! To remove yourself from receiving future newsletters, please remove your username here. Sarah (talk) 08:35, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Ibid
In this edit you use. Why not use simply, as I have seen it done in (so far) all other maintenance templates? Debresser (talk) 00:18, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
 * It allows wrapper templates to pass their names, using the same paradigm. Rich Farmbrough, 01:29, 5 August 2012 (UTC).

Antonio Diego Voci
Hello, I'd just like to thank you for the improvements you're in the process of making to the Antonio Diego Voci page, they are very helpful. Is there any way I can be of assistance to you? Ahjkl67435 (talk) 16:11, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 August 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 10:24, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
SarahStierch (talk) 23:38, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Football box header
Hi Rich. Is Template:Football box header, which you created in September last year, still required? It's not transcluded anywhere and it's only referenced as a "See also" from the docpage for Template:Football box. If it's no longer required, I'll propose it for deletion (or you can, if you prefer). Thanks. DH85868993 (talk) 08:03, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I've nominated the template for deletion. You are welcome to participate in the deletion discussion. Regards. DH85868993 (talk) 12:06, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Templates and sockpuppets and categories and if tests and OH GOD THE HORROR
Hi Rich, I ended up staring at Template:Sockpuppet category for a while (for something minor and already fixed), and I think I spied an error in the template. Check out this diff in Template:Sockpuppet category/sandbox please and let me know if you agree. From what I can tell, namespace errors are being silently unreported because the if tests are not closing properly. The closing brace in that diff change should fix it but I'm not confident enough to just slap on a protected edit request and call it a day. BigNate37(T) 19:49, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * You were right about the error. I changed the sandbox and made a testcase. I think that is better, I used classic code indentation, so it need a little testing, but looks OK. Rich Farmbrough, 23:03, 9 August 2012 (UTC).

Nearly forgot- re: session musicians
Hey. when I want to add a more subcategory rather than just session musicians to American session musicians there's normally no problem. But I tried to do so for those from New Zealand, and I think I screwed it up. And-- today, I find that there are some Czech session players which could use a similar category.. but, you see my dilemma? I mean, first I screw up the New Zealand one- check and see! I wanted to add Bruce Lynch and Neil Finn to the NZ session players at the least. I'd appreciate your help. :) --Leahtwosaints (talk) 10:38, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Should all be good now. Let me know if there are problems. Rich Farmbrough, 02:42, 2 August 2012 (UTC).


 * Many thanks, as usual! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 01:30, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Wiki-work
Cheers Rich, I think you should have an email, let me know if this is not the case. Tommy Pinball (talk) 20:34, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Skip if contains .{2000}
Greetings Rich, I just wanted to clarify something. The Skip if contains .{2000} statement you made. Is that greater than 2000 or less than? Also, does that include things like infoboxes and categories? I assume it does but not sure. Kumioko (talk) 16:15, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
 * It would match 2000 or more characters. I would assume a hard and fast rule would not be needed, but you could craft a regex to do a reasonable job of excluding infoboxes and categories, with a little work. Rich Farmbrough, 16:55, 11 August 2012 (UTC).


 * Thanks, is there a way to say something like 0 to 500? Its fine if it includes categories and templates that small, it'll still be a stub. Kumioko (talk) 17:33, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, .{0,500} Rich Farmbrough, 17:45, 11 August 2012 (UTC).


 * Awesome thanks I'll give that a go. Kumioko (talk) 19:34, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't think I am doing it right. When I put in .{0,1000} under doesn't contain (assuming that anything with more would still have that many) with the regex box checked, it still doesn't catch some that I know are less than 1000 characters. Is there something else that I am missing? Kumioko (talk) 20:49, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
 * So they are being skipped, what is the reason in the skip field in the log? Rich Farmbrough, 00:50, 12 August 2012 (UTC).


 * As much as I have used AWB I didn't even know there was a skip log. Kumioko (talk) 01:00, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 * On the right hand side next to the edit summaries is a "Logs" tab, click on Logs and at the bottom is a scroll list of article you've skipped for the session with a skip reason column. Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 01:05, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Well what do ya know there it is..lol. Learn something new everyday. Kumioko (talk) 01:13, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

The message on the log says "Page does not contain .{2000}". Kumioko (talk) 02:41, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 * But the skip is supposed to be set to .{0,1000} .... Rich Farmbrough, 03:01, 12 August 2012 (UTC).


 * Makes sure the Regex is ticked in the skip tab. Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 03:05, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I've tried it a few different ways. Contains/Not contains, with and without regex, .{2000}, .{0,2000} and various other combinations. I just can't seem to get it to work right. Kumioko (talk) 03:07, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 * OK I'll try to test tomorrow. Rich Farmbrough, 03:46, 12 August 2012 (UTC).


 * Problem with ".{0,1000}" is that it matches everything as every article has at least 0 characters. What I got to work was Skip - If contains .{1000,} this will skip if there is more then 1000 characters in the none excluded part of an article. If instead you want smaller articles skipped just put and tick it in the not contains option instead. Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 12:17, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes indeed. That's where we started I think and we got lost on the highways and byways of the regex. Rich Farmbrough, 19:52, 12 August 2012 (UTC).


 * Thanks guys its working now. I restarted my computer and then reopened AWB and it started working. Something must have been locked up somewhere. Kumioko (talk) 23:20, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you
Hello Mr. Farmbrough,

Thank you for your time and expertise in clean-up execution on Antonio Diego Voci. We have addressed, with your assistance both issues of capital letter inconsistency as well as toning down of bolding. Plus we restored the two 1957 paintings that inadvertently disappeared upon your edit. By the way, “clientage” is a legitimate word, “a body of clients; clientele; customers, but we like your word “patrons”. And in “USA” we write “color” without the “u”; and “traveling” without the extra “l”. Also we had not realized Wikipedia used the European system for dates, the day first then the month, which we actually prefer. Are you British? Even though the USA is no longer a colony, we celebrated the Queen’s birthday right along with you folks on Facebook and Twitter. And watched the Olympics every day. London is probably now suffering aftershock.Ahjkl67435 (talk) 17:58, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
 * You are welcome. The regional spelling does not greatly matter either way - I would not object if you change it. I used the date system associated with Europe, since Voci is associated primarily with Europe - Wikipedia uses both systems, but consistently within articles, and subject to geographic usage. It is best to avoid obscure words, all else being equal, so that the articles can be read by the widest possible audience.  I think the article is interesting, and, although I can see parts might be objected to by some editors, useful.
 * Indeed I am British, although I was in the US for the opening ceremonies... Rich Farmbrough, 18:48, 13 August 2012 (UTC).

Respond
Hello, Rich Farmbrough. Please, listen to me. I need you help. Please, help me. I am at the very end of good faith, so please, please, read this and this, following your logical conclusion. Help me to understand am i wrong, or something else is wrong here. Dont ignore me, i saw that you are very neutral and quite familial with wiki rules. -- WhiteWriterspeaks 20:01, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

TfD for new Cite_web/smart
I am contacting you, per wp:CANVAS, after contacting mostly negative or neutral editors, as a user known to be supportive about quick, fast citation templates, in considering the latest TfD discussion. In this case, the template {Cite_web/smart} is finally the big upgrade to entirely replace {Cite_web} with a faster version that carefully checks the parameters to only invoke {Citation/core} for any rare parameters, else quickly formats a cite plus COinS data. Now, {cite_web/smart} is a massive extension of your October 2011 Template:Cite_book_quick, as a hybrid with {cite_web} and new {cite_quick}. See TfD of 11 August 2012:
 * WP:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2012_August_11

This notice is only an FYI, as announcing the discussion under way. Feel free to oppose the template, support the template, ignore the discussion, or even delete this message. The TfD just started, so there should be, at least, 4 days (18 August 2012) to consider the issues.

With that formality stated, I want to thank you for creating Template:Cite_book_quick, which inspired me to create a hybrid template that handles all {cite_web} parameters, only invoking {Citation/core} to format the rare parameters. Currently, major article "Arab Spring" hits the include-size limit, but {cite_web/smart} could reduce the template expansion size in all 1.1 million articles using {cite_web}. -Wikid77 (talk) Wikid77 (talk) 06:13, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 August 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 11:31, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Burton's Biscuit Company - changes
Hi Rich, I noticed you have been changing some text on the Burton's article. When amendment you made that is incorrect is Cadbury brands licensed by Cadbury UK. This should really state Kraft Foods as the official owner of the brand. Please can you undo. Thanks Mrs biskit (talk) 15:14, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Citation needed cheap
Template:Citation needed cheap has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. -- Beland (talk) 14:49, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks very much!
Thank you very, very much for the fantastic list of orphaned American artists you generated for me - that's really some service! I'd love to know more about how you managed it but perhaps will wait until I've done some reading and have sensible questions to ask. In the meantime, many thanks! Mfbjr (talk) 15:28, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Helping out at The Teahouse
Thanks a bunch for helping out at the Teahouse. Many of your answers have been very helpful! One little thing, since many new users are asking question, some may not know about watchlists or realize they need to check in once in a while to see if their question is answered. For that reason, when you do answer a question, please use the talkback template located here on their user talk page so that they know their question has been answered. There is also a script which you can install that will leave the template automatically when you answer a question. Toodles. -- Jayron  32  01:17, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry for stalking but whats the script and does it work outside the teahouse? Kumioko (talk) 01:31, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
 * There are a few different scripts located here and they only work in the Teahouse; though someone with some coding skill (read: not me) could likely adapt them for other purposes. There are likely also other scripts in existence which do what you want, but the teahouse scripts only do teahouse tasks.  -- Jayron  32  01:38, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 August 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 09:30, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Mdann52 (talk) 05:15, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Er... lol? Rich Farmbrough, 16:07, 21 August 2012 (UTC).

Moving Burma to Myanmar - ongoing poll
This is to let you know that an ongoing poll is taking place to move Burma to Myanmar. I know this happened just recently but no administrator would close these frequent rm's down, so here we go again. This note is going out to wikipedia members who have participated in Burma/Myanmar name changing polls in the past. It does not include banned members nor those with only ip addresses. Thank you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 04:59, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Upgrading status of The Little Sister
Hi Rich. I noticed you changed The Little Sister from Stub to Start. I'm a new editor so still not familiar with the review process. I've made a lot of changes to The Little Sister over the last month and I put it in the queue for a formal re-assessment on the Project Novels/Assessment page. When I checked that page it seems to me that the assessment hasn't been completed yet (there is still one page ahead of Little Sister and its not struck through yet). I'm assuming you just noticed the amazingly awesome work I've done ;) and made the change in status? I wanted to check because the text (I assume from a template) that says the page has no references is still there and it clearly does have references now. Can/should I just remove that and if so can you give me a hint how? Or should I just wait for the assessment and let them remove the bit about no references? thanks! Mdebellis (talk) 20:30, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, while some of the projects have formal assessment systems, I felt sure that promotion to at least "Start" was warranted, after seeing your comments at Teahouse.  Yes  you can/should remove the unreferenced tag, except that I have done that.  In general these tags should be removed when they have served their purpose, but naturally people are a little reticent to do so. Rich Farmbrough, 21:55, 22 August 2012 (UTC).


 * Great. Thanks! Mdebellis (talk) 22:03, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
SarahStierch (talk) 06:23, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject OWS
You recently moved this template to WikiProject Occupy Wall Street. While that did make it clearer what it was about, I've reverted it back to the current title, as the name of the WikiProject actually is WikiProject OWS (WP:WikiProject Occupy Wall Street is a redlink). I'm inclined to think that WikiProject should probably be renamed, but as long as it's under that title, the accompanying template should be too. Robofish (talk) 16:13, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

An invitation for you!
Happy editing! AutomaticStrikeout 21:15, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Feedback requested at the Village Pump
Hi Rich. I have a proposal at the village pump about introducing a color scheme to the text editor so it is easier for newer editors to differentiate between different kinds of syntax, particularly references. I'd welcome your feedback at the village pump. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 01:20, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Ping
Hi. In case you're not watching meta: m:Talk:Wikimedia Medicine. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 00:31, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 August 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 06:29, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Trucks Act and coal scrip
Many thanks for the comment on the coal scrip article. I agree, 100%, yes, the truck acts were an outcome. My only contention, as one who has been through the usage of scrip first hand, is to define it and then, yes, by all means, show the social issues associated wih its use. I wanted to present a pro and con synopsis and will of course keep this as neutral as possible.Coal town guy (talk) 14:27, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

save police time, shoot yourself
I certainly didn't mean for it to sound like that. I think if he had responded at ANI with an "oh, I did not kno that, i will not do it again" it would have died down. It's the "I'm doing nothing wrong" response, followed by the "they're all out to get me" defense that doesn't help. I only followed up on the hand in the tools thing because he doesn't use them a right lot, and he's actually said somewhere before this that he's not finding adminning fun. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 14:58, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
 * This heading is rather shocking! -- Ohconfucius  ¡digame! 03:22, 31 August 2012 (UTC)