User talk:Truco/Archive 24

Re
Thank you and you are welcome. Was no bother anyway, feel free to ask anytime for future instances.-- Will C  02:07, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah good, now that you are back, we can get the WCW TV Champs done.-- Will C  02:20, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Well the lead is all that seems to be left except for tables updates. So we could get it done this week if God's willing. User:Wrestlinglover/List of TNA X Division Champions is where I have it stored, so when you feel up to it there it is.-- Will C  02:35, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Don't worry about it. You will have a chance to make up for it with the WCW TV Champs list. Yeah, probably.-- Will C  00:52, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, do it whenever you can. I'm focused on other things anyway, so I'm in no rush.-- Will C  03:46, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

What are we going to do about the Hardcore title? It has seemly failed. I don't know why really, we only had two supports and one oppose, plus there was only one editor who had a problem with the way the reigns were added. Now Mshake3 has opposed because he says there are errors, of which he has yet to actually tell. Any ideas on what our next step should be?-- Will C  11:06, 25 August 2009 (UTC) I thought it had a chance at being an FL, but it seems I was wrong. I know it can become an FL, just discussion at WT:PW hardly turns out good.-- Will C  02:01, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

OOB of the Battle of San Domingo
Hi, sorry but I got mixed up and didn't notify you that I'd already answered Rambling Man's comments on the order of battle at the Battle of San Domingo. If you are still able to provide a review that would be helpful, but if not the don't worry. Regards--Jackyd101 (talk) 06:50, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Re: FLC is all yours now buddy
I'm sorry to hear about this, but at the same time glad for you; a change is good once in a while! Come to FLC when you can, but enjoy life outside Wiki, too. To be honest, I'm not sure how I've kept up the pace I have (good multitasking skills?), nor how much longer I can continue like this. Cheers, and thanks for your hard work, Dabomb87 (talk) 04:07, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry to hear about your lack of availability too. Your contributions are excellent and we'll miss you.  Please pop by from time to time!  The Rambling Man (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

SVR2010
Any chance I could help you by writing up a match gameplay section? --  Θaks  ter   19:54, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I'd be too selfish not to give one back.

List of WWE Hardcore Champions
At the present time, there are active concerns about whether or not reigns should be counted in two of the tables. I'm waiting for a resolution before supporting.  Giants2008  ( 17–14 ) 15:09, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Left a note at the FLC clarifying my position. Probably should have done that to start with.  Giants2008  ( 17–14 ) 21:43, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Re:NFL Help
I think that most of them already are like that. Were you wanting to make a template or just change all of them to match? ~ Richmond 96  t  •  c   19:44, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * There's a template called Template:NFL Schedule Entry. Its only used here and it's not the same style but we could work from it. Its kinda like the college football schedule template. ~ Richmond 96  t  •  c   23:25, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * There are so few teams without it, so it may be better to just change them all. Also the template is kinda complicated and it takes up alot of space.~ Richmond 96  t  •  c   23:28, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I just counted and there are only 2 teams that don't use that format. Buffalo and New England. ~ Richmond 96  t  •  c   23:35, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The format in 2009 New Orleans Saints season. Is there something I'm missing? ~ Richmond 96  t  •  c   23:44, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I think it would be simpler to just change those two. ~ Richmond 96  t  •  c   00:00, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

FLRC delegate election
Hi ! I'm just dropping by to let you know of the FLRC delegate election that begins on Tuesday. You may run in the election by following the instructions on the page. If you don't wish to run, please come and vote sometime next week! The election starts Tuesday and ends Saturday. For more information, check out the opening section of the page. Cheers,  iMatthew  talk  at 19:37, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Being that you haven't edited in two days, you probably haven't seen this. I was curious if you planned on running in this, as you've mentioned an interest in helping out in this way before.  iMatthew  talk  at 19:31, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Notice
Hi. I'm posting to let you know that your name has been mentioned on a list of Highly active users on the talk page for RfA's here. If you are interested in running for administratorship, or if you would like to make any comments, feel free to join the discussion. -- Soap Talk/Contributions 17:35, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * FWIW, I think you'd be a great administrator once you have time to become more active.  iMatthew  talk  at 15:01, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll be looking forward to it! And to reply to the other comment, I actually have an RfA open now. :P  iMatthew  talk  at 15:27, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm surprised and very pleased to see both! Thanks for the vote, and the reviews at FLC. You know how much we need you there! ;)  iMatthew  talk  at 15:39, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Ditto; it was nice to see you on my watchlist again. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:03, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

International Space Station
Hello there! As an editor who has posted a comment in one of the recent Peer Reviews, GANs or FACs of International Space Station, I was wondering if you wouldn't mind commenting in the current Peer Review as to whether you feel your original comments have been dealt with, if you see any new issues with the article, and whether or not you believe the article will meet the criteria for Featured Article status. Any new comments you have would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks, Colds7ream (talk) 16:58, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

FL red link criterion discussion
See here. Cheeers, Dabomb87 (talk) 01:45, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Re: List of American politicians who admit to cannabis use
As a frequent PR/FL/FA reviewer, I thought you might want to offer an opinion here as to whether or not this proposed list is appropriate and up to Wikipedia standards (of course, the list would be expanded and the lead would be expanded to include additional context). If this list is inappropriate to begin with, I will not even start the page. However, I don't see how this information couldn't be found elsewhere, as each entry is cited appropriately. I am simply trying to think of other lists that could be created for WikiProject Cannabis. If you have an opinion, it would be much appreciated. Otherwise, keep up all the great work you do here! -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:52, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

The WPVG Newsletter (Q3 2009)

 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  04:25, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Awards
Congratulations! Hope to see you sign up for the 2010 WikiCup, here, if you haven't already!  iMatthew  talk  at 22:48, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Skunk Anansie discography
Hi!, as you recently assessed this article in the previous FL nomination, would it be okay if you could re-assess the second nomination? :). Cheers and many thanks!Marcus Bowen (talk) 15:44, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

Happy Truco's Day!
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk  • 00:05, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

ISS FAC4.
Hello there! As an editor who has posted a comment in one of the recent Peer Reviews, GANs or FACs of International Space Station, or who has contributed to the article recently, I was wondering if you wouldn't mind commenting in the current Featured Article Candidacy with any suggestions you have for article improvements (and being bold and making those changes), whether or not you feel any issues you have previously raised have been dealt with, and, ultimately, if you believe the article meets the Featured Article guidelines. This is the fourth FAC for this article, and it'd be great to have it pass. Many thanks in advance, Colds7ream (talk) 16:42, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

The WPVG Newsletter (Q4 2009)

 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  21:27, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/IWGP Junior Heavyweight Tag Team Championship/archive1
All concerns have been addressed.-- Will C  08:31, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey, I replied at the FLC. Just thought to tell you so we can speed this along. The review has been open for almost a month. FLC is backed up, getting the close on your review would allow it to be closed soon and give more focus to newer nominations.-- Will C  06:59, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi Truco; good to see you around FLC. When you get the chance, can you revisit this FLC and cap/strike out your resolved comments? Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 15:38, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

WT:PW
I think you posted your comment in the wrong section. It's under "Zack Ryder" instead of the WM23 section.  HAZardousMATT toxic 03:55, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by William Gibson/archive1
Hi Truco, can you revisit this when you have the time? Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 22:39, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of Texas Tech Red Raiders men's basketball seasons/archive1
I have responded to your comments. Thanks for your review! NThomas (talk) 20:03, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * You've got mail... on the FLC page. NThomas (talk) 20:06, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Needs one more revisit. Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 15:57, 1 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your reviews! Staxringold talkcontribs 00:47, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, thanks a bunch! Featured list candidates/List of Boston Red Sox first-round draft picks/archive1 is nearly there; could you take a last peek? Thanks again, Dabomb87 (talk) 22:43, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Regarding your comment on my talk page, anything you can do is appreciated. I usually add to the log when I do closures, but it seems quite a few editors review the lists when I put them up there so I'll update it more often. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 00:15, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

I think WWE Brand Extension would be better classified as a article with an embedded list than as a proper list article. Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 22:08, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

List of best-selling singles of the 2000s (UK)
I have addressed the issues for the FA nomination of List of best-selling singles of the 2000s (UK) Mephiston999 (talk) 03:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, Featured list candidates/List of Pop Idol contestant music releases/archive1 needs a revisit. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 16:50, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Hey there
Hi there Truco. If you get the chance on Friday evening, would you mind taking a look at a couple FLCs? I understand totally if you don't want to or don't have the time (it's Friday, after all), but there are several lists at the bottom of the FLC list that have been languishing for days without comment. Featured list candidates/List of places of worship in Worthing/archive1, Featured list candidates/List of Washington state symbols/archive1 and Featured list candidates/Laudian Professor of Arabic/archive1 are nearly ready for the star, but need a few more eyes. Whether you review a couple or not, thanks again for all you've done at FLC. Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 03:54, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much for your reviews! I'm not going to ask you to do more (you've already gone above and beyond what I hoped for), but just if you could just keep track of the Worthing FLC, since that is close to promotion, that would be great. Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 00:36, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, I lied; there is one more FLC that could use another pair of eyes: Featured list candidates/List of Memorial Cup champions/archive1. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 01:22, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
 * List of Memorial Cup champions FLC needs a revisit. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 22:23, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * ...and in anticipation of next weekend's closures, if you could look at any of these FLCs in the following 6 or 7 days, that would be great:
 * Featured list candidates/List of battlecruisers of Germany/archive1
 * Featured list candidates/List of non-ecclesiastical and non-residential works by John Douglas/archive1
 * Thanks! Dabomb87 (talk) 22:27, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * North Carolina basketball FLC needs a revisit too. Link. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:04, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, Dabomb, for rounding up a reviewer for Featured list candidates/Laudian Professor of Arabic/archive1, much appreciated. Sorry I didn't notice the review immediately, Truco - didn't spot it when I checked my watchlist on 19 Feb, and then it scrolled off the bottom... Hope it's looking more to your liking now. BencherliteTalk 20:38, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks so much for all your reviews! Featured list candidates/List of non-ecclesiastical and non-residential works by John Douglas/archive1 looks like it's ready for you to take a look. Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 03:51, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of Metallica concert tours/archive2
Thanks for the very constructive review. I hope I fixed most of the issues you brought up. Nergaal (talk) 06:10, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

List of number-one Billboard Top Latin Songs from the 1980s
Hello. I think that all concerns have been addressed, regarding the list I've been developing. Thank you for all your comments. Jaespinoza (talk) 00:36, 24 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you. I will submit the list next monday. Jaespinoza (talk) 03:37, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Timeline of the 2009 Atlantic hurricane season
Hey Truco I am the creater of the Timeline of the 2009 Atlantic hurricane season article. About the FLC, you appearantly seem finished because you said last "...The only problem that remains is contacting the other contributor to the article." I was sent a message about the FLC about 24 hours. Do you have something else you want to being up, or are you done with the review? So do or support or oppose? Go comment of the page. Thank you for your review! --12george1 (talk) 22:41, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

FLCs needing revisits
Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 22:38, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Featured list candidates/List of North Carolina Tar Heels men's head basketball coaches/archive1
 * Featured list candidates/List of United States Military Academy alumni (Confederate States Army)/archive1
 * Featured list candidates/Philadelphia Athletics (1890–1891) all-time roster/archive1
 * Featured list candidates/Pussycat Dolls discography/archive2
 * Featured list candidates/List of Metallica concert tours/archive2
 * Featured list candidates/List of invasive species in the Everglades/archive1
 * Featured list candidates/Bon Jovi discography/archive1
 * Featured list candidates/List of Medal of Honor recipients for the Boxer Rebellion/archive1

WikiBirthday
I saw from here that it's been three years since you joined the project. Happy WikiBirthday! Keep up the good work, r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 15:26, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of Medal of Honor recipients for the Boxer Rebellion/archive1
Hello, I think I have addressed your comments. Could you please stop by and take a look. --Kumioko (talk) 12:16, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Edit war
Hello. You appear to be involved in an edit war on Prince George's County Public Schools ‎. While the three-revert rule is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits. Note that posting your thoughts on the talk page alone is not a license to continue reverting. You must reach consensus. Continued edit warring may cause you to be blocked. It may also lead to your losing rollback privileges. Toddst1 (talk) 00:27, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Re: FLCs needing revisits
Don't worry too much. Everything that you've done despite your busy schedule IRL so far is appreciated. One thing you can do is perhaps clarify in your review how forthcoming your support is (e.g., "I support when these comments are resolved", or "I will not strike my oppose unless other reviewers go against me"). I just want to make sure that I'm not misjudging consensus, which is why I like it when reviewers revisit and cap their comments. Cheers and thanks again, Dabomb87 (talk) 04:25, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Having said that, can you revisit Featured list candidates/List of National Treasures of Japan (residences)/archive1 when possible? It could probably be closed pretty soon. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 02:57, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Also Featured list candidates/List of number-one albums of 2009 (Mexico)/archive1. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 14:10, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Follow up on "World Wrestling Entertainment is.... FAKE?"
Just a quick follow up on the page disruption notice [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Professional_wrestling/Archive_75#World_Wrestling_Entertainment_is...._FAKE.3F from a month back... ]

See WT:PW. -- Unquestionable Truth -- 05:30, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

The WPVG Newsletter (Q1 2010)

 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  17:18, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Request
Hi Truco, seems like you've been real busy lately. If you get the time, can you lend a pair of eyes to Featured list candidates/List of Pop Idol contestant music releases/archive2? You reviewed and supported at Featured list candidates/List of Pop Idol contestant music releases/archive1, which failed due to lack of consensus; I'm hoping that the same thing doesn't happen again. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 19:08, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Fixed the issue you raised (thanks for the quick response). Dabomb87 (talk) 04:04, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Response to your message
As far as an edit war goes, the other editor was using an anonymous account as a sock puppet account to vandalize the article or force his one edit that had wrong information. I already DID seek resolution and the problem ended over a week ago. NJZombie (talk) 14:42, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
Dabomb87 (talk) 03:46, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Montreal Screwjob
Hey Truco!

I have had a lot of issues with the image and photography people on Wikipedia. I was shocked to see you have been able to keep the Montreal Screwjob photo alive here on Wikipedia without it being taken down. Good work! That is pretty damn impressive!

Keep up the awesome work! -- Sc r ew ba ll 23  talk 02:24, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

FLC review urgent
Hi! Since you are familiar with reviewing Lists of National Treasures of Japan, I thought you could help out with the following... List of National Treasures of Japan (archaeological materials) is presently a featured list candidate and marked as Nominations urgently needing reviews which means that it is in danger of failing the nomination due to a lack of reviews. I'd be happy, if you could have a look at the list and leave comments, questions or suggestions at the nomination page. The criteria to be checked against are found here. Thanks. bamse (talk) 14:23, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Karanacs (talk) 17:31, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Re: Grammy Award for Best Female Rock Vocal Performance
Since you commented on and supported the promotion of Grammy Award for Best Male Rock Vocal Performance, I thought you might also like to comment on a similar list for Best Female Rock Vocal Performance. If you are not interested, no problem! Thanks! -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:12, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I hope your concerns have been addressed. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:48, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/2006 boys high school basketball All-Americans/archive1
Can you please revisit Featured list candidates/2006 boys high school basketball All-Americans/archive1.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:10, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/2010 NCAA Men's Basketball All-Americans/archive1
Since you commented at Featured list candidates/2006 boys high school basketball All-Americans/archive1, I thought you might want to give me advice at Featured list candidates/2010 NCAA Men's Basketball All-Americans/archive1, which is in need of feedback.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:15, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Ping
Truco, thank you so much for your recent FLC reviews. Can you revisit Featured list candidates/List of Final Fantasy media/archive1 and Featured list candidates/Grammy Award for Best Dance Recording/archive1 when you get the chance? Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 15:02, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NFS2008.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:NFS2008.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:28, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/2009 NCAA Men's Basketball All-Americans/archive1
I thought you might consider commenting on Featured list candidates/2009 NCAA Men's Basketball All-Americans/archive1, which is getting to be an old nom, since you supported Featured list candidates/2010 NCAA Men's Basketball All-Americans/archive1.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:22, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WWEHeat2008.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:WWEHeat2008.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:19, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

RfC on Featured List Criteria section 3b
Hello. There is currently an RfC in progress at Wikipedia talk:Featured list criteria in progress regarding Criteria 3b of the featured list criteria and whether it should be modified or eliminated. As you participated in a previous discussion regarding Criteria 3b when it was first introduced, this discussion may be of interest to you. –Grondemar 16:16, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

FLC National Treasures of Japan swords
Hi! Since you already reviewed a List of National Treasures of Japan, I thought you could help out with the following. List of National Treasures of Japan (crafts: swords) is currently a featured list candidate and listed as Nominations urgently needing reviews which means that it might fail unless somebody (you ;-) ) reviews the list. So far it received two "support" votes and one "oppose". All issues raised in the oppose vote have been addressed (the reviewer, "The Rambling Man", just needs to revisit the page). I'd be happy if you could take the time to review the list and leave comments, questions, suggestions and a vote ("support" or "oppose") on the nomination page. Thanks. bamse (talk) 09:46, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

RE:Move request
Done. I messed up the first one (still not sure what I did...), but I think I fixed it and got the histories right. Nikki ♥  311   02:56, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Adopt-a-user reminder
Hello, I have completed a general cleanup of the adopter information page for the adopt-a-user project, located here. During my cleanup, I have removed several inactive and retired users. In order to provide interested adoptees with an easy location to find adopters, it is essential that the page be up-to-date with the latest information possible. Thus:


 * If you are no longer interested in being an adopter, please remove yourself from the list.
 * If you are still interested, please check the list to see if any information needs to be updated or added - especially your availability. Thank you.


 * You are receiving this message because you are listed as an adopter here.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Netalarm (talk) at 05:50, 23 September 2010 (UTC).

Orphaned non-free image File:Create.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Create.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  03:49, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

An update from adopt a user
Hi there ! You may be wondering, what have I done to sound the alarm this time? Nothing. I'm messaging you in regards to the adopt-a-user program, which currently has a backlog of users wishing to be adopted. This doesn't make much sense, as we have a considerable list of users offer adoption, so there shouldn't be any backlog. I've begun to eliminate this backlog myself through a matching program, but I need your help to make it work. Of course, adoptees and adopters don't have to go through there, but I believe it helps eliminate the backlog because someone is actively matching pairs.

On the list of adopters, I have modified the middle column to say "Interests." It's easier working with other users that have similar interests, so if it's not too much to ask, could you add your interests in the middle column? For example, if I was interested in hurricanes, computers, business, and ... reptiles? I would place those in the middle column. Counter-vandalism and the like can also be included (maintenance should be used as the general term). The more interests, the better, since adoptees can learn more about you and choose the one they feel most comfortable working with. The information about when you're most active and other stuff can go into the "Notes" section to the right.

Finally, I've gone around and asked adoptees (and will in the future) to fill in a short survey so adopters can take the initiative and contact users they feel comfortable working with. We all know that most adoptees just place the adopt me template on their user page and leave it - so it's up to us to approach them and offer adoption. So, please take a look at the survey, adopt those that fit your interests, and maybe watchlist it so you can see the interests of adoptees and adopt one that fits your interests in the future.

Once again, thank you for participating in the adopt-a-user program! If you wish to respond to this post, please message me on my talk page.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Netalarm (talk) at 05:28, 11 October 2010 (UTC).

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2010
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 19:00, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:KoR.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:KoR.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  04:19, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Bands Against Bush nominated for deletion again
As you commented in the earlier discussion, I wanted to make you aware of Articles for deletion/Bands Against Bush (2nd nomination), which I have just started. Please feel free to comment there if you wish. — Gavia immer (talk) 21:46, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2010
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 18:21, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

List of former championships in World Wrestling Entertainment
Hi Truco, I have proposed a merge of the list of former and current champions here. Since you created the list, I thought you might like to contribute to the discussion. -- Scorpion 0422  20:37, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2011
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 03:17, 6 April 2011 (UTC)