User talk:Reallmmablogger

Hello, Reallmmablogger, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users - please check it out! If you need help, visit Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Happy editing! JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 19:28, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Joanna shari
A tag has been placed on Joanna shari, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  TN ‑ X - Man  19:41, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Umberto Branchini
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Umberto Branchini, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.ibhof.com/branchini.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:58, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Umberto Branchini
A tag has been placed on Umberto Branchini requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NuclearWarfare (talk) 05:01, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Rob Calloway
I removed most of the content from Rob Calloway, since it appears to be a copyright violation of - please be careful not to just copy content from copyrighted sources. --Amalthea (talk) 17:09, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Marc Ratner
A tag has been placed on Marc Ratner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Amalthea (talk) 17:32, 13 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The tone you just used on my talkpage was completely uncalled for!
 * I listed the URLs that appear to be the source of most, if not all the sentences on the Marc Ratner article in the proposal for speedy deletion:
 * http://www.secondsout.com/Ringside/scenes.cfm?ccs=357&cs=9843
 * http://www.mmafacts.com/main.cfm?actionId=globalShowStaticContent&screenKey=cmpNews&htmlID=8876&s=mma
 * http://www.mmauniverse.com/news/SS623
 * Furthermore, almost *all* of the articles you created seem to contain content taken from websites in violation of copyright.
 * If you disagree, place the hangon template on the article page and explain on the talk page of the article why, in your opinion, the text was not taken in violation of copyright, just as it says in the box on Marc Ratner.
 * Amalthea (talk) 17:47, 13 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh please. says "© 2005 - 2008 MMA Universe. All rights reserved.", the paragraph starting with "His last official duty with the" is an exact copy from the page, and even if a website doesn't state that its content is under some sort of copyright, you still can't add it to wikipedia: It has to be released into the public domain, or be licensed unter the GFDL or something equivalent. Amalthea (talk) 17:53, 13 July 2008 (UTC)


 * ... and that's true even if you delete that part of the sentence. --Amalthea (talk) 18:12, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the heads up (talk) I have taken care of it thank you.

Reallmmablogger talk 18:37, 13 July 2008 (UTC)


 * OK, glad we're OK again. Cheers, Amalthea (talk) 18:42, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

July 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Newsboy Brown has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: 'tripod\.com' (link(s): http://members.tripod.com/ http://members.tripod.com/ http://members.tripod.com/ http://members.tripod.com/). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 21:15, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: Marc Ratner
It looks like it's been solved now. I'm not sure if you've written this on other sites, but there was a copyright violation. The user pointed to this page- notice that the section below the line is identical to the first paragraph of the version of the article that was marked for deletion. It's been removed now, so it should be okay. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 19:19, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

100 greatest punchers etc
Hi, I have deleted the various copies of this list as a copyright violation per Copyright problems/2008 June 19/Articles. Kevin (talk) 22:01, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Back on Wikipedia What I know about copyrights could fit in a thimble. I suggest you post at the village pump; maybe someone can be of assistance there. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:28, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Willie Joyce article
You created an article for the name 'Willie joyce'; the correct setup for that sort of miscapitalization is to use a redirect to the correct capitalization at Willie Joyce. I have redirected that page now. See Help:Redirects for instructions on how to do it yourself when the need arises. &mdash; Carl (CBM · talk) 18:03, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

George KO Chaney
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of George KO Chaney, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: George Chaney. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:55, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Freddy Welsh
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Freddy Welsh, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Freddie Welsh. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:02, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Harlem Tommy Murphy
A tag has been placed on Harlem Tommy Murphy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Stifle (talk) 18:12, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Boxrec links
Glad to see another boxing enthusiast editing. A couple style issues, though. Why do you change the links to Boxrec.com on boxers' pages? It looks much better as, for instance "" rather than http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=13693&cat=boxer&pageID=3, don't you think? Also, I don't think it's Wiki style to refer to the subjects by their first name.MKil (talk) 18:17, 29 July 2008 (UTC)MKil
 * The confrontational tone of your post on my talk page is unwarranted and a violation of Wiki etiquette. Furthermore, your reversion to the Belanger page undid my work to improve it. As the Wiki Manual of Style points out, "Do not use lists if a passage reads easily using plain paragraphs."
 * I applaud your enthusiasm to add to the boxing pages here. However, your entries need a lot of clean up to make them into good Wikipedia articles. If you get angry when people try and clean them up (and it seems I'm not the only one you have clashed with) then you need to realize that you don't own the articles you create and they will be edited.MKil (talk) 15:23, 30 July 2008 (UTC)MKil
 * As far as the Tyson Wrestlemania incident goes, I removed it because it is a very trivial event in Tyson's career and giving that much space to it in the Tyson article is ridiculous. Wiki is not here to be a comprehensive biography. It should not catalog every little event in someone's life.MKil (talk) 15:27, 30 July 2008 (UTC)MKil
 * On my talk page you said, "But you are not justified by deciding what should be in someone article or not. If you continue to re edit the profile I will continue to fix them have a nice day." My edits to the Belanger article were to clean it up and bring it into line with the guidelines of the Manual of Style. Simply reverting these edits as you did without any reason given is unjustified. If you think I left info out, then go ahead and restore it. But to revert to a version that is little more than three lists is destroying an improvement of the article.MKil (talk) 11:56, 31 July 2008 (UTC)MKil
 * I just undid your change to Mike Tyson again. For one thing, you completely undid MKil's change, which had a whole lot of other improvements in it, for another I agree that a lengthy description of his Wrestlemania appearance seemed too much. MKil shortened and moved the appearance info to a more fitting place. Amalthea (talk) 14:39, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * ETA: And also, why did you revert my change to Manning Galloway and reintroduced your copyright violation of ? --Amalthea (talk) 14:43, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

There is no copyroght for Manning Galloway The article is written my own words not a copyright.Also I fixed the Mike Tyson page. Thank You Reallmmablogger (talk) 14:50, 1 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Copying the content from and changing a couple of words is by no means "written my own words", it's a copyright violation. And as I just saw, you did the same to Billy Soose, and changed Mike Tyson to some in between state?
 * I will have to give you a warning for your disruptive edits. If you continue to willfully introduce copyright violations, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Amalthea (talk) 15:05, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

August 2008
Please stop assuming ownership of articles. Doing so may lead to disruptive behavior such as edit wars and is a violation of policy, which may lead to a block from editing. ''The same goes for Charley Belanger and others as well. '' Amalthea (talk) 15:07, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I also have to question why you undid my edits of Young Corbett II. I actually turned what was little more than a list of opponents into a narrative article and supplied references and categories. Do you really think the version to which you reverted is superior or are you doing this just out of spite?MKil (talk) 15:48, 1 August 2008 (UTC)MKil


 * I checked your Mike Tyson edit again and I reacted a bit too strong, I see now that you didn't just revert again, but tried to find some compromise. I didn't initially notice because some of MKil's other edits were still undone, and his Wrestlemania information was also still in. I put some of your info back to give a bit more context, I hope that everyone can live with that. I'd say that further discussion about that topic should go to Talk:Mike Tyson. Furthermore, I very much appreciate that you expand a lot of boxing articles with infoboxes. Just please try to work with other editors on them. If articles are flagged with cleanup templates, it usually is for the good of the article, because they attract other editors who can further improve it. If you feel that a tag is misplaced and you remove it, at least state your reason in the edit summary. And please, try to take care not to violate copyright in the future. Cheers, Amalthea (talk) 16:08, 1 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Why do you continue to revert my edits to Charley Belanger? As I pointed out above, Wiki style is that info should be written in article form, not in list form. The relevant info about his career is in the article. If you think more needs to be added, then fine. But to simply continue to add pointless and redundant lists to the article diminishes its quality.MKil (talk) 20:13, 3 August 2008 (UTC)MKil


 * CHARLEY IS WRITTEN IN BOTH FORMS THANK YOU Reallmmablogger (talk) 20:15, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
 * What? To be a well-written entry, it should only be written in the form of an article. Adding a redundant list lessens its quality. Why do you keep re-inserting these redundant lists?MKil (talk) 21:07, 3 August 2008 (UTC)MKil

I'm going to say it one last time: you cannot introduce copyrighted material to Wikipedia, as you did for the third time to Billy Soose. Every sentence you added was taken from or  (and wasn't notable anyhow). Furthermore, your edit warring at the Charley Belanger article is disruptive, and you have been warned about this before too. MKil constructively copyedited the intro section of that article, according to MOS:BIO, and removed the list sections with information of disputable notability. Reverting the edit in total just because you don't agree with part of it is not constructive. Lastly, you came very close to breaking the three-revert rule, and you already broke its spirit. Pleae make sure to read that policy. -- Amalthea Talk 21:14, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

What the Bleep is going on
I thought we were cool now your writing me on some stuff I have no clue about there is no copyright ob billy soose. I will let you have your way with it I am done with this non sense. Enjoy watching the Billy Soose page. Just make sure that Charley Belanger stays the same. Stop taking sides Reallmmablogger (talk) 04:54, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

There will be no more edits from me on Billy Soose so dont write me on him again. I want to thank you for the time you take out to help Wikipedia. You have helped find a resolution with both Tyson and Belanger and I am thankful. So this comes to an end now let MK know too just like you let me know. No more BS I do not care about this just want to make sure that researchers can get the most of what they are researching. Reallmmablogger (talk) 04:58, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Editor Assistance Board
As a courtesy I'm letting you know that I opened a discussion on our issues here .MKil (talk) 19:29, 4 August 2008 (UTC)MKil

Edit Summaries
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary with your edits. Mfield (talk) 19:32, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Conflict
Thanks for the apology. I'm glad this is behind us. I look forward to working together to ensure the boxing section here is complete, up-to-date, and well-written.MKil (talk) 17:46, 5 August 2008 (UTC)MKil

Wrestling articles
TNA Unbreakable is still a start class article. It is no where near done. Against All Odds (2008) is still a start class as well since I have yet to finish it to where it is a B class article.-- Will C  09:32, 27 December 2008 (UTC)


 * It is not but a start class article is not considered expanded by the project. It was once under expansion and has since been inactive. Until it gets a report made it is an inactive article unless someone feels like working on it and it gets moved to the underconstruction section of the PPV expansion list. I'm trying to find time to get it finished, so maybe not long will it be inactive or anyother TNA PPV article since I'm working on each in a subpage. I'll keep that in mind.-- Will C  09:38, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mike Miller (wrestler)


The article Mike Miller (wrestler) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced BLP which has sat for 12 months. No prejudice against recreation as a properly sourced article, but it's too difficult to search for the right Mike Miller among biographical reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. tedder (talk) 06:27, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter message
It has recently been brought to the attention of WP:PW that the newsletter is being to delivered to several users who have not been actively editing for several months. As a result, their talk pages have become increasingly large, unmanageable and slow to load due to a lack of archiving. In response, this message is being sent to all editors listed in Category:WikiProject Professional wrestling participants to say that anyone who does not list their name at WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Active before May 16 will be automatically listed at WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Nospam, and will no longer receive the newsletter or any notification of it. If you are added to WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Nospam, please feel free to remove your name if you desire. If you wish to continue receiving the newsletter as normal, please add your name to WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Active. If you simply wish to receive notification of a new issue, but not have the full newsletter delivered to your talk page, please add your name to the notification only list. If you have any queries please contact me at my talk page or leave a message at WT:PW. Thank you for your co-operation. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 00:36, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Bo Cantrell for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bo Cantrell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bo Cantrell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. LlamaAl (talk) 22:16, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of John Machado for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Machado is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/John Machado until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. giso6150 (talk) 17:58, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers
Hi ,

In order to better control the quality  of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Jimmy Ambriz for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jimmy Ambriz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jimmy Ambriz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.  ♡RAFAEL♡(talk) 02:09, 1 October 2022 (UTC)